Logo

    33 - The End of the End of History feat. Philip Cunliffe and George Hoare

    en-usAugust 30, 2021
    What was the main topic of the podcast episode?
    Summarise the key points discussed in the episode?
    Were there any notable quotes or insights from the speakers?
    Which popular books were mentioned in this episode?
    Were there any points particularly controversial or thought-provoking discussed in the episode?
    Were any current events or trending topics addressed in the episode?

    About this Episode

    I talk to Phillip Cunliffe and George Hoare about their new book The End of the End of History.  

    In 1989, Francis Fukuyama predicted a boring eternity of liberal capitalism and for nearly 30 years, it looked like he might be right. We had Clinton and Blair. Globalization and apathy. Kurt Cobain. According to my guests, the end of History wasn’t just about politics, it was a whole vibe. 

    But since 2016, things have started happening that don't quite  fit the pattern and the pundits are losing their minds. Do Brexit, Trump, and the new politicization signify the end of the end of History? 

    We chat about how the political zeitgeist has changed in recent years and what that may hold for the future. 

    Phillip Cunliffe and George Hoare are, along with Alex Hochuli, co-hosts of the Aufhebunga bunga podcast and co-authors of The End of the End of History: Politics in theTwenty-First Century.

     

    Support the show

    Recent Episodes from Good in Theory: A Political Philosophy Podcast

    45 - Humane War feat. Samuel Moyn

    45 - Humane War feat. Samuel Moyn

    War tends to bring out the human propensity for atrocity. Nobody likes indiscriminate killing, torture and so on. What to do about it? One response is to avoid war altogether. According to Yale prof Samuel Moyn, that’s what most people wanted after World War II and after Vietnam. But more recently, he’s noticed a shift. Now, politicians, especially in America, are focussing on making more humane. Leaders like Obama say they’ll make war as ‘clean’ as possible by using drone strikes and special forces and minimizing civilian deaths and secret torture programs. That’s all well and good but Moyn sees a danger: making war more humane makes it easier to justify. If war is ‘clean’, why not wage it forever? 

    Samuel Moyn, Humane: How the United States Abandoned Peace and Reinvented WarMoyn’s podcast about legal theory Digging a Hole

    Support the show

    44 - Samuel Huntington "The Clash of Civilizations?"

    44 - Samuel Huntington "The Clash of Civilizations?"

     Samuel J. Huntington’s 1993 “The Clash of Civilizations?” is the most assigned article in American political science. It predicts a worldwide culture war (but not the kind you're thinking of). The book became a massive bestseller, Huntington was all over TV and his theory is still talked about all the time. It made him a darling to the press but reviled by his fellow academics.   Think of "Clash"  as a dark rejoinder to Fukuyama’s already-pretty-morose “End of History.” Instead of a peaceful but boring post-history, Huntington thinks that the end of the Cold War heralds a new era of worldwide civilizational conflict not only because of the Muslims (but also because of the Muslims). 

    Support the show

    43 - Tyranny at Work feat. Elizabeth Anderson

    43 - Tyranny at Work feat. Elizabeth Anderson

    Americans hate when the state tells them what to do. They’ve got freer speech, freer access to guns and less regulation on business than any other rich country. 

    So why do they let their work bosses walk all over them? American workers have less rights and worse conditions than workers in any other developed country. Employers can fire employees at will, impose arbitrary schedules and prevent them from forming unions. They tell them what to wear, what they can publicly say and even when they can take a shit. Why do freedom-loving Americans stand for this? 

    Elizabeth Anderson is a philosopher at Michigan State University, Ann Arbor. She thinks her country is in the grip of free-market ideology AKA “libertarianism” AKA “classical liberalism.” According to this viewpoint, any interference by the state in the private sector is a violation of freedom. But when the state won’t defend workers’ rights, they allow employers to subject their employees to a tyrannical form of “private government.” Freedom for the boss means servitude for the worker. 

    We talk about the history of this ideology, the consequences for American workers and how the tide may finally be starting to turn. 

     

    Support the show

    42 - The New Aristocracy feat. Matthew Stewart

    42 - The New Aristocracy feat. Matthew Stewart

    Matthew Stewart is a philosophy PhD and author. He’s also a Princeton guy and former management consultant so he knows rich people. 

    His new book, The 9.9%, is about them. Not the super-rich, but the doctors, lawyers and managers that go to good colleges and live in nice neighbourhoods. The “nearly rich and not-famous,” as he puts it. 

    We talk about how these people raise their kids, get their money and block the poorer element from their neighbourhoods. Matthew reckons the 9.9% are a new kind of aristocracy that’s entrenching inequality and making everyone hate parenting. In the end, it’s not really the white collar player he hates; it’s the game of inequality. Though he doesn’t sound very fond of the players either. 


     

    Support the show

    41 - Love in the Time of Big Data feat. Alfie Bown

    41 - Love in the Time of Big Data feat. Alfie Bown

    Big tech companies tell us they’re our servants, existing to fulfill our desires more cheaply and conveniently than ever. Alfie Bown doesn’t think so. He thinks Deliveroo, Tinder, Pornhub  etc. aren’t just giving us what we want, they’re shaping what we want. He reckons our tech overlords are secretly remaking humankind on the level of desire. 
     
    We chat about Chinese cars that know what you want to eat and why time travellers don’t get horny. 

     

    Bown is the author of a new book called Dream Lovers: The Gamification of Relationships

     


    Support the show

    40 - Is Liberal Democracy the Best We Can Do? feat. The Morality of Everyday Things

    40 - Is Liberal Democracy the Best We Can Do? feat. The Morality of Everyday Things

    Is democracy the worst form of government except for all the others or is it just the worst?

    This is a crossover with the  delightful Morality of Everyday Things podcast. Jake and Ant and I discuss what liberal democracy is, the arguments in its favour, and some big critiques. Episode includes Plato, Nazis and Lizards. Enjoy!

    Also, go listen to MOET pod!

    References

    Francis Fukuyama, The End of History and the Last Man

    Carl Schmitt The Crisis of Parliamentary Democracy

    Karl Popper, The Open Society and its Enemies

    Support the show

    39 - The Glorious History and Ugly Present of Rhetoric feat. Rob Goodman

    39 - The Glorious History and Ugly Present of Rhetoric feat. Rob Goodman

    Rhetoric is supposed to inspire. Imagine Cicero exhorting the Roman people, Churchill vowing to “fight on the beaches.” Yet, when politicians speak today, it’s almost always boring or obnoxious. Why? 

    Prof. Rob Goodman, author of Words on Fire: Eloquence and its Conditions comes by today to talk about the history of rhetoric, what Cicero knew that we don’t, and the political speech styles of Trudeau (boring), Trump (obnoxious), and X González (pretty great, actually). 

    Support the show

    37 - Thought Lab 4: The Psychology of Horror

    37 - Thought Lab 4: The Psychology of Horror

    Grizzly bears are scary. But what about zombie grizzly bears? What’s makes something horrifying rather than just frightening? 

    Paul has a theory. It turns out that humans have a psychological way of organizing the world that also creates the possibility of getting really creeped-out. It helps explain the horror of the zombie grizzly why the old Dracula was creepier than Twilight and how war propaganda can turn enemies into monsters. 


    References

    David Livingstone-Smith (philosopher where Paul’s getting his ideas about essentialism and dehumanization from)

    Credits 

    Paul Sagar
    Clayton Tapp (intro)
    David Zikovitz (outro)
    Sep (art)

    Support the show