#40 – What is Postmodernism?

In this episode, Virgil goes into the idea of wearing masks to hide our real feelings and our true selves. In this discussion, we will investigate the concept of masks and why we choose to wear them. Masks can hurt our relationships and, ultimately, our lives. Masking our emotions is a coping mechanism that stops us from genuinely processing them and integrating them into our character. People who wear masks are driven by trauma, and we all experience different types of trauma in our lives. A mask covers up wounds and doesn’t allow those wounds to heal. It hides the pain. In this episode, you'll learn how to take off the mask and better regulate and manage negative emotions and a negative self-image. If you want to be honest with others, you first have to be honest with yourself. Wounds need air to heal. Its time to take your mask off, will you join me?

In this episode, Vigil and his returning guests, Danny and Matt, discuss the topic of postmodernism. This episode focuses on the differences between modernism and postmodernism and why talking about this topic is essential. The show then goes into whether postmodernism exists only in the realm of art and literary theory, or is it also a social phenomenon. We then discuss if postmodernism leads to cultural and moral relativism and whether that point of view can lead to a generally skeptical view of the world. We also cover the concern if postmodernism can cause science denialism, because of the general belief that we can't know anything for sure, no matter the tools we use. We finally finish the episode on the costs and benefits of using a postmodern lens to view the world.

In this episode, Virgil goes over the concept of logical fallacies and the different types used in discourse. Logical fallacies work on people because they make messages feel more persuasive. Ultimately fallacies hurt the trust and credibility of a person making an argument; therefore, the truth isn't the focus. This episode focuses on what logical fallacies are, the negative aspects of using them, and their overall effect on the way we interact with others.

In this episode, Virgil and his previous guests Danny and Matt, discuss the concepts of High and Low culture. This episode will focus on discussing why these cultural forces and cultural divisions are important. Through these discussions, we can learn more about our culture, which gives us a more nuanced view of our society. High culture is a collection of cultural products, mainly in the arts, held in the highest esteem by a culture. Low culture is a collection of cultural products not held in the highest esteem by a culture. High culture is the culture of the elites within a society. Low culture is connected to popular/mass culture and is the culture of the everyman. Through this discussion, we hope to explore better these two cultures and how they interface with society and where or not these divisions have disappeared over time.

In this episode, Virgil goes over the tools and strategies that we need to build self-confidence in times of self-doubt. Self-confident individuals build trust in their abilities, have a sense of control of their lives. Self-confident people believe they will be able to do what they wish, plan, and expect. Self-confident individuals have realistic expectations, and even if those are not met, they continue to be positive. Individuals who lack self-confidence find it challenging to be successful and ultimately happy. When self-esteem is the norm for an individual, their talents and skills have the chance to shine and be noticed by their peers and community. We all live with self-doubt and second-guessing, but with these tools and strategies, we hope to be able to build up our confidence and remain positive in the face of our successes and failures.

In this episode, Virgil and his friends, Awkward Hermit, Matt, and Auguste discuss the concept of separating art from the artist. Is it ever possible for us to be able to separate a talented individual and their pieces of art from their harmful, immoral, and at times, criminal behavior? Should we banish all artwork created by individuals that may be talented but are evil people? Should we try to find nuance and look at the concept and issues case by case following the facts and victim testimony before canceling the artist's work entirely?

This discussion will cover everything from musicians, actors, directors, athletes, etc. We attempt to take a rational approach to the separation of art and the artists that create the artwork. We discuss the deification of artists and other public figures and how that might skew our perception of how good or bad these people might be. Just because these individuals may be talented, impactful, or famous, that doesn't mean they are good people and treat others with respect. The Me Too movement has been a catalyst for people that consume art to reevaluate the artists that they admire. The Me Too movement has driven people to investigate whether or not these public figures might be immoral and criminal people. We hope we can bring clarity to such a problematic, nuanced, and emotional topic.

In this episode, Virgil continues the discussion about the left and right with his guests D and Matt. In this podcast, we go into more detail of what the term “right” is, particularly in respects to the cultural, moral, social, economic, psychological aspects of the various groups on the right and how they might or might not have something in common with the left. This episode includes a discussion on the Moral Foundations Theory and what the moral psychology of people traditionally on the right is. When then contrast the rights morals foundations to liberals and libertarians to better understand one another and the basis to our moral foundations. We then discuss the social and cultural aspects of the right in respects to movements and government action. Finally, we discuss what various groups on the right believes is right in terms of economics and how that translates to public policy. 

In this episode, Virgil and his two previous guests, Matt and Mischa, come on the show to discuss foreign policy. This podcast will focus on the general aspects of foreign policy, U.S. adventurism, the anti-war movement. The main element of this discussion will focus on whether or not Libertarians and Socialist can have an alliance against the current establishment foreign policy. With this potential alliance, can we move the nation towards a more peaceful and rational approach to engaging with other nations? The podcast starts out identifying what foreign policy is and why it's essential for us to discuss it and its consequences on our country and the world at large. We then move on to talk generally about diplomacy, war, and the tertiary option ( aka covert intervention). We then talk about how our different approaches to foreign policy and how it connects to our particular politics, morality, economics.

In this episode, Virgil and his friends discuss the topic of what is the left and right. This podcast is part one of two dive into the political spectrum and political philosophy. In this podcast, former guests D, Pseudo, Danny, and Matt join us to discuss the left and right in respects to their origins, present, and future. We discuss the ideological roots of the left and right and try to unpack its connection to government and society. We talk about the difference between authoritarianism and libertarianism and its connection to the political spectrum. We then talk a bit about the fringes and extremes of the far-left and far-right and how they cause damage to our world. We close the podcast discussing whether identifying on the left or right is valuable or if labels all together are antiquated and unuseful. Through understanding the political spectrum we can better understand others and ourselves.

In this episode, Virgil and his previous guests, Danny and Matt discuss the intersection of class and taste and how both connect to culture. We each give our ideas on what a social class is and how its represented in our world. We then discuss the concept of taste, its connections to aesthetics, and whether or not its something connected to our evolutionary history, social construction, or perhaps both. The conversation moves into whether or not a class system impacts and shapes our tastes. This episode is meant to explore who we are in a society and why we enjoy, and we participate in things we find tasteful whether or not because of our social class.