Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • The Impact of Passive Investing on MarketsPassive investing's rise in popularity has led to concerns about market efficiency and the role of active managers, while also promoting market participation and reducing transaction costs.

      The shift from active to passive investing, with more people owning the market through index funds, has raised concerns about potential market consequences. Passive investment, which involves buying and holding a broad market index with minimal intervention, has been growing in popularity due to its historically underperforming active counterpart. This trend has led some to worry about market efficiency, as passive investing could potentially reduce the role of active managers who pick individual stocks. Critics argue that passive investing can distort market dynamics, making it harder for active managers to generate alpha and potentially leading to market inefficiencies. However, proponents argue that passive investing promotes market efficiency by reducing transaction costs and encouraging broad market participation. Ultimately, the impact of passive investing on markets remains a topic of ongoing debate.

    • Passive Investing Affects Stock Market EfficiencyPassive investing may reduce companies' sensitivity to news and market conditions, potentially impacting stock market efficiency

      Passive investing, which involves buying and holding a broad market index rather than actively picking individual stocks, may be making it harder for individual stocks to respond appropriately to news and market conditions. A recent academic paper published by the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MBS) found that companies in heavily tracked indices like the S&P 500 have a significantly reduced sensitivity to currency shocks, indicating that they may not be reacting as they should to relevant news. This could potentially undermine the efficiency of the stock market, as the point of investing is to reward companies that are doing well and punish those that are not. However, the implications of this finding are complex, as passive investing has become increasingly popular due to its lower costs and perceived reliability. It remains to be seen how this trend will impact the overall functioning of the stock market and what, if anything, investors and regulators can do to address any potential issues.

    • The dominance of a few large companies in the stock market raises philosophical questions about the true meaning of indicesThe increasing dominance of a few large companies in the stock market challenges the notion of what indices truly represent, potentially making retirement funds heavily reliant on their success and increasing market risks.

      The increasing dominance of a few large companies in the stock market, as represented by indices like the S&P 500, raises philosophical questions about what the index truly signifies. At a certain point, it may simply be an indicator of the amount of money in the market rather than a reflection of corporate America's performance. This concentration also means that a significant portion of investors' retirement funds, for instance, are tied to the success of these companies and their leaders, such as Microsoft and Google. This massive exposure to a few stocks, particularly those trading at high valuations, can be problematic and may not accurately represent market exposure as traditionally conceived. While some argue that human decisions determine what is included in an index, the dominance of these large companies makes it increasingly difficult for individual investors to make successful stock picks. The risks associated with these companies, such as regulation and geopolitical tensions, are shared among all investors, making the potential for significant losses a real concern. However, some argue that investing in established companies like Apple and Microsoft offers a degree of safety and stability in an uncertain economic climate. Ultimately, the implications of this trend are complex and require further consideration and debate.

    • The rise of passive investing and market efficiencyPassive investing may be the best scalable option for most investors, despite occasional excitement for active management strategies and their potential for high returns. Market highs historically perform well in the year following peaks, and active management strategies often don't scale beyond a certain pool of capital.

      The rise of passive investing has led to some unusual market patterns and concerns about market efficiency. However, it may not be as simple as assuming there are significant pricing discrepancies between market prices and fundamentals for active managers to exploit. The market's record highs, while making some investors uneasy, have historically performed well in the year following such peaks. Additionally, while active management strategies can deliver impressive returns, they often do not scale well beyond a certain pool of capital. In summary, passive investing may be the best scalable equilibrium for most investors, despite the occasional excitement surrounding active management strategies and their potential for high returns.

    • Understanding Financial Products: Passive Investing vs Virtual EconomiesPassive investing and virtual economies teach valuable financial concepts, but it's crucial to be aware of potential issues and complexities in both.

      Passive investing, despite feeling like following the crowd, is a sophisticated and democratized financial product that is the same for individuals and institutions. However, it's important to be aware of potential issues and philosophical wrinkles, especially in uncertain markets. Elsewhere in the discussion, Katie expressed her fondness for the online game Runescape, which taught many, including herself, valuable financial concepts through in-game trading. The game's economy and mechanics served as an introduction to arbitrage and value chains, and its impact on a generation of investors was significant. Despite some uncertainties surrounding the game's player base, Katie remains a fan. Overall, the conversation highlighted the importance of understanding financial products and their implications, whether it's through passive investing or virtual economies.

    • Perseverance in the Face of SetbacksNo matter the setback, keep pursuing your passions and hobbies with determination and resilience.

      No matter how many setbacks we face in our passion or hobbies, we should not give up easily. Katie, a cycling enthusiast, shares her experience of getting knocked off her bike by a van and the emotional struggle she went through before deciding to get back on it. She expresses her love for cycling and her determination to continue despite the risk of accidents. Listeners showed their support with kind emails and bike safety tips. Katie apologizes for her previous harsh words towards Ethan during their earlier conversation. The episode ends with a reminder for safe travels and an invitation for bike route recommendations. Unhedged, produced by Jake Harper and edited by Brian Erstat, is back every Thursday with more episodes.

    Recent Episodes from Unhedged

    Can Morgan Stanley's CEO build a better bank?

    Can Morgan Stanley's CEO build a better bank?

    Ted Pick became chief executive of Morgan Stanley earlier this year. In a recent letter to shareholders, he touted “the integrated firm” as a model for the bank's future. But it’s not a new idea, and it’s one that has proven very hard for banks to actually do. Today on the show, Rob Armstrong asks the FT’s US banking editor, Josh Franklin, if it’s even a good idea. Also we short the US housing market and summer in New York City. 


    For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedoffer


    You can email Robert Armstrong at robert.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com.


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Unhedged
    enJune 27, 2024

    Are we all protectionists now?

    Are we all protectionists now?

    On Thursday, two candidates for US president will debate each other. They are both protectionists. This is a huge change in US economic policy, and one that may have massive consequences in the decades to come. Today on the show, Robert Armstrong talks with the FT’s chief economics commentator, Martin Wolf, about the past and future of industrial policy. Also we go long ageing and long babies.


    For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedoffer


    You can email Robert Armstrong at robert.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Unhedged
    enJune 25, 2024

    Distressed IPOs

    Distressed IPOs

    Golden Goose had a simple plan. Mass produce worn out sneakers, get stars to wear them, and sell them to the public. It was going great until the owner announced an IPO, and then pulled it. Today on the show, Katie Martin and James Fontenella-Khan discuss. Also, we go long German football and long sterling. 


    For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedoffer

    You can email Robert Armstrong at robert.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Unhedged
    enJune 21, 2024

    Elon Musk’s big payday

    Elon Musk’s big payday

    On Thursday, shareholders of Tesla voted to re-approve a deal to reward Elon Musk with more than $50 billion worth of shares in Tesla, thus making one of the world’s richest men even richer. Also we go long teams without stars and short climate change. 


    For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedoffer


    You can email Robert Armstrong at robert.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com




    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Unhedged
    enJune 18, 2024

    Central bankers do nothing. Markets respond

    Central bankers do nothing. Markets respond

    The Federal Reserve held rates steady on Wednesday, and markets went whooshing upwards, as if they thought no-move was a clear signal about the next move. For a bit anyway. Today on the show, Katie Martin is joined by Chris Giles, the FT’s economics commentator, to talk about the Fed and the crucial next few months before the US election in November. Also we short transatlantic rate arbitrage, exams and Nigel Farage.


    For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedoffer


    You can email Robert Armstrong at robert.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Unhedged
    enJune 13, 2024

    Trade like a bot

    Trade like a bot

    Researchers at the University of Chicago took a fairly standard large language model of AI and fed it a bunch of balance sheets and income statements and asked it to make predictions about earnings. In backtests, AI beat human calls by a small margin, and outperformed the market generally. Have fund managers been dealt yet another kill shot? Katie Martin and Robert Armstrong discuss, and go long shareholder commitments, and the musical genius of Yuja Wang.


    For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedoffer


    You can email Robert Armstrong at robert.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Unhedged
    enJune 11, 2024

    The gamma squeeze

    The gamma squeeze

    Nvidia continues its rocket-like rise: Investors have piled in, as have day traders who play the stock with options. This is causing banks and market makers to load up on shares in order to cover trades. It's a feedback loop traders call the gamma squeeze, and some are concerned it’s distorting markets. Today on the show, Katie Martin talks about Nvidia and the gamma squeeze with correspondent George Steer. Also we go long the ECB and short proposals for a Texas stock exchange. 


    For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedoffer


    You can email Robert Armstrong at robert.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Unhedged
    enJune 06, 2024

    What elections mean for markets this year

    What elections mean for markets this year

    It’s a big year for democracy. Voters in Mexico and India just went to the polls. Elections in the UK and US are still to come. On today’s show, Rob Armstrong and Katie Martin talk through how markets are responding to the elections in Mexico and India. And they analyse how markets might react to the UK and US elections. Also, we go short slugs and stock-based compensation.


    For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedoffer


    You can email Robert Armstrong at robert.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Unhedged
    enJune 04, 2024

    The billionaires’ tax

    The billionaires’ tax

    At a recent meeting of the G20, Brazil invited economist Gabriel Zucman to address the most powerful nations in the world, and argue for a global tax on the super-rich. Today on the show, European economics commentator Martin Sandbu joins Robert Armstrong to discuss whether a worldwide tax on the very richest could even happen, and how it might work. Also, we short the commercial real estate crisis and go long liberal democracy. 


    For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedoffer


    You can email Robert Armstrong at robert.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Unhedged
    enMay 30, 2024

    Who killed Red Lobster?

    Who killed Red Lobster?

    Red Lobster used to be a respectable place to eat too much seafood. Now it’s bankrupt. Today on the show, host Rob Armstrong and the FT's Wall Street editor Sujeet Indap put on their bibs and pick apart the exoskeleton of a fast-casual icon. They talk about pasta water, real estate, and whether the real killer was the all-you-can-eat shrimp promotion. Also we go long Chili’s, and deliver the results of an informal art poll. 


    For a free 30-day trial to the Unhedged newsletter go to: https://www.ft.com/unhedgedoffer


    You can email Rob Armstrong at rob.armstrong@ft.com and Katie Martin at katie.martin@ft.com


    Read a transcript of this episode on FT.com



    Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.


    Unhedged
    enMay 28, 2024

    Related Episodes

    How Passive Investing Could Change Capitalism

    How Passive Investing Could Change Capitalism

    The biggest macro trend in investing is the rise of so-called "passive investing." But while this may have advantages for the individual investor, it raises a whole new host of issues, such as elevating the role of index designers, and decreasing the emphasis on studying individual companies. On this week's Odd Lots podcast, we speak with Bernstein's Inigo Fraser-Jenkins who once wrote a note that said passive investing is "worse for society than Marxism."

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    How Poker Explains the Battle of Passive and Active Investing

    How Poker Explains the Battle of Passive and Active Investing

    Among the biggest trends in the world of markets is the rise of passive investing. Rather than pay high fees to active mutual fund managers (who often fail to beat the market), people are pouring money into passive strategies that track major indices, but with little cost. So what are the ramifications of this trend for investors who choose to remain active? On this week's Odd Lots podcast, we speak with Michael Mauboussin, who heads global financial strategies at Credit Suisse and is not just an expert on the world of investing, but also on the role of luck in success. As he sees it, trading is like a game of poker, and in poker you want to play against weaker, less-skilled players. But as more and more of those less-skilled players opt not to trade (choosing passive strategies) then the game gets harder.

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Jeff Ptak – The Prospects for Active Management - [Invest Like the Best, EP.16]

    Jeff Ptak –  The Prospects for Active Management  - [Invest Like the Best, EP.16]
    Joining me on the podcast this week is Jeff Ptak, head of global manager research at Morningstar.  Jeff’s role puts him in the unique position to discuss the state of active management because he gets to see mutual funds from both the bottom-up, through deep diligence on investment strategies and firms, and top-down, using Morningstar’s data to assess industry-wide trends.  Jeff is one of my favorite myth busters and discuss different variables for assessing active managers and mutual funds, but we also cover his favorite punk rock bands.   Please enjoy!   For comprehensive show notes on this episode go to investorfieldguide.com/ptak/ For more episodes go to InvestorFieldGuide.com/podcast.  Sign up for the book club, where you’ll get a full investor curriculum and then 3-4 suggestions every month at InvestorFieldGuide.com/bookclub Follow Patrick on twitter at @patrick_oshag