Podcast Summary
Focus on fundamentals before complex problems: To make informed investment decisions, prioritize understanding a company's business model and avoid getting bogged down in complex data before addressing the basics.
While the abundance of data in today's digital age is a valuable resource for investors, it can also be overwhelming. Aswath Damodaran, a leading professor of Corporate Finance and Valuation at New York University, emphasizes the importance of converting data into usable information through discipline and a structured approach to thinking. When evaluating a company, the first step is to understand its business model and what it actually does. This may seem like a simple task, but as Damodaran humorously points out, a company named "Universal Export" could be a trading or manufacturing business with vastly different operations. By focusing on the fundamentals and avoiding the temptation to solve complex problems before addressing the basics, investors can make more informed decisions.
Understanding a company's fundamentals before analyzing data: Start by grasping a company's business model and revenue sources before diving into financial ratios to avoid misunderstandings and misleading information.
When analyzing companies and interpreting data, it's crucial to first understand the fundamentals of what a company does and how it generates revenue. Assessing a company's name or jumping into financial ratios too quickly can lead to misunderstandings. A notable investor, Joel Greenblatt, emphasizes the importance of simplifying data, especially for those new to investing. He wrote "You Can Be a Stock Market Genius" and "The Little Book that Beats the Market," where he simplified complex investing concepts. To simplify data, one can start by remembering basic statistics learned in statistics classes, such as medians and aggregate numbers, instead of relying solely on averages. It's essential to be aware of skewed distributions, which can make averages misleading. Additionally, taking a basic statistics class can provide a strong foundation for dealing with financial data.
Mean reversion: A lazy investment approach: Assuming assets will return to historical averages (mean reversion) is not a reliable investment strategy. Investors should strive to understand companies instead.
Mean reversion, the investment strategy of assuming that assets will eventually return to their historical average, is not a reliable or logical approach to investing. This was highlighted in a discussion about the importance of understanding statistics in analyzing financial data, as statistics can help identify anomalies that may not revert to the mean. Wall Street analysts were criticized for relying too heavily on statistical averages and assuming mean reversion, even when it may not be valid. The speaker argued that investing based on mean reversion is a lazy approach and that investors should instead strive to truly understand the companies they are investing in, rather than relying on assumptions about historical averages. The 20th century's strong economy and long-lived companies made mean reversion a successful strategy, but it is not a defensible assumption in all cases, as companies have different life cycles and market conditions can be irrational.
The 21st century business landscape: Companies age and eventually leave: Understanding the natural process of company aging and accepting it's an inevitable part of the business world can lead to better investment decisions.
The long-term success and sustainability of companies in the 21st century are vastly different from those of the 20th century. Companies like Yahoo, which peaked and declined rapidly, challenge the assumption that things will revert to the average. The life cycle of companies has compressed, and investing in a company as it slides down that life cycle could lead to significant losses. The CEO of Nokia, once a world beater, famously stated that events overwhelmed the company rather than mistakes being made. Companies, like living organisms, age and eventually need to leave. Despite this reality, we continue to idolize empire builders and try to replicate the success stories of companies like Apple or Microsoft, often leading to poor returns for shareholders. Instead of taking inspiration from outlier success stories, it's essential to understand the natural process of company aging and accept that it's an inevitable part of the business world.
The Shift from Value to Growth Investing: Traditional value investing strategies may no longer guarantee success due to factors like data access, investor size advantage, and shortening business life cycles. Growth investing could be the new way to make significant returns.
The dominance of value investing as a successful investment strategy, as exemplified by Warren Buffett, may be a thing of the past. The speaker suggests that this is due to several factors, including the ease of access to data, the advantage that larger investors have over smaller ones, and the shortening of business life cycles. He also points out that some of the most successful companies in the market today, such as Tesla, Monster Beverage, and Costco, would have been unlikely choices for value investors based on traditional investment heuristics. The speaker concludes that the current investment landscape may require a shift towards growth investing, as there is no longer an easy way to make significant returns. Additionally, the speaker reflects on how the past can provide lessons, but not always accurate predictions, for the future. For instance, the automobile industry was once thought to be immune to disruption, but companies like Tesla have proven this assumption wrong.
Invest with Flexibility and Understanding: Approach investing with an open mind, consider a company's story and potential growth, and focus on inflation and real growth as primary drivers of interest rates.
Investors should be open-minded and avoid rigid rules when it comes to investing in companies. The speaker shares his experience of buying NVIDIA and Tesla despite their high valuations and how he regrets ruling out companies based on simplistic metrics. He emphasizes the importance of considering a company's story and potential growth, rather than relying solely on traditional valuation models. Additionally, the speaker warns against the common misconception that the Federal Reserve solely controls interest rates and encourages investors to revisit first principles, focusing on inflation and real growth as the primary drivers of interest rates. Overall, the key takeaway is to approach investing with flexibility, a long-term perspective, and a deep understanding of the underlying fundamentals of companies and markets.
Misconception about the Federal Reserve's role in investment decisions: Investors should focus on intangible assets like knowledge, information, and data to evaluate a company's value, as accounting-driven metrics like book value are less relevant in today's economy
The focus on the Federal Reserve's role in determining interest rates and investment decisions is a misguided heuristic. Instead, investors should consider the intangible assets, such as knowledge, information, and data, that drive value in today's economy. Accounting-driven metrics like book value are less relevant as they fail to capture the value of intangible assets. The speaker emphasized that patents, for example, are valuable assets even if they cannot be seen. The accounting industry's inability to adapt to this shift makes it difficult to accurately evaluate companies based on their intangible assets. Therefore, investors should broaden their perspective beyond traditional accounting metrics and consider the cash flows generated by intangible assets when evaluating a company's value.
Intangible Assets and Their Role in Company Valuation: Intangible assets impact a company's value significantly but are hard to quantify. Accountants should focus on recording transactions accurately, while experts handle intangible valuations. Beware of excessive adjustments in financial statements.
Intangible assets, such as brand name, management team, and market trends, play a significant role in a company's value, but they are difficult to quantify and account for. The speaker values these intangibles in Birkenstock's case, but finds it impractical for accountants to include them in financial statements. Instead, he suggests leaving such valuations to experts. He also criticizes the trend of using adjusted numbers, like EBITDA, for pricing and comparing companies, which can lead to egregious or unnecessary adjustments. The speaker argues that equity research analysts primarily price companies rather than value them, and that some adjustments are necessary for comparability, while others reflect analysts' laziness or outdated thinking. He gives examples of stock-based compensation and leases, which were initially misunderstood and then later correctly accounted for, but then reversed due to resistance from the accounting industry. Overall, the speaker believes that accounting should focus on its traditional role of recording financial transactions accurately, while valuation experts handle the intangible aspects of company worth.
Watch out for manipulated financial reports: Investors should be cautious of adjusted financial numbers and recognize their impact on profits. Active investors and short sellers play a vital role in uncovering market mistakes.
While some accountants may try to manipulate financial reports by excluding certain expenses like stock-based compensation, investors should be wary of such adjusted numbers. Comparing it to a pizza store owner giving away pizzas to employees instead of paying high wages, these expenses still impact profits and should be accounted for. The rise of passive investing and index funds may exacerbate this issue as they take a naive approach to adjusted numbers. The importance of active investors and short sellers in uncovering market mistakes cannot be overstated. The argument that markets are efficient and no one needs to look for mistakes can lead to inefficiencies. Therefore, it's crucial for investors to remain vigilant and not blindly trust adjusted numbers. Additionally, individuals should reflect on their decision-making process and hold themselves accountable for the choices they make.
Managing family funds and individual stocks: Focus on value investing and selling overvalued stocks, maintain individual stocks carefully for long-term goals, and prioritize peace of mind over constant portfolio tending.
Accountability and responsibility are key aspects of managing other people's money, but the speaker chooses not to do so and only manages his own family's funds. He believes that individual stocks require more care and maintenance than funds, and his goal is to help his children pass the "sleep test" by having a portfolio that allows them to go to bed without worrying about it. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of selling when a company becomes overvalued and the high maintenance nature of having companies in your portfolio. He admires Charlie Munger and shares that one of the most impactful pieces of advice from him is the idea that you should buy and sell based on value, not just buy and forget.
Trust your common sense when evaluating information: Exercise skepticism towards info contradicting common sense, even from experts. Use your thinking abilities and stay critical to stay informed.
Importance of trusting your common sense when evaluating information, especially when it conflicts with what you're being told by experts or the media. Charlie Munger, Warren Buffett's business partner, emphasized this point, advising listeners to be skeptical of information that doesn't align with common sense, even if it comes from reputable sources. Munger also encouraged listeners to exercise their own thinking abilities and not rely too heavily on external sources, as common sense is like a muscle that needs to be used regularly to stay strong. Additionally, he reminded listeners that even experts make mistakes, so it's important to approach all information with a critical mindset. As always, it's important to remember that people on the program may have investments in the stocks discussed, and The Motley Fool may have formal recommendations.
![Aswath Damodaran - Making Sense of the Market - [Invest Like the Best, EP. 279]](https://www.podcastworld.io/podcast-images/invest-like-the-best-with-patrick-o-shaughnessy-3pmywn1q.webp)
