Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Rules around food expiration dates vary greatlyDifferent regions have distinct regulations on food expiration dates, leading to unnecessary food waste for grocery stores.

      Food waste is a significant issue in the grocery industry, particularly for perishable items like red meat and milk that have expiration dates. For store owners like Corey Thompson, trying to sell these items before they expire can be a challenge, leading to food being thrown away or discarded. This phenomenon is known as shrink, and it's an inevitable part of running a grocery store. However, the rules and expectations around food expiration dates can vary greatly from place to place. For example, in Montana, the state requires milk to be sold within 12 days of pasteurization, which is half the industry standard. As a result, stores are forced to throw away fresh milk before it has a chance to be sold, adding to the overall food waste. This not only impacts store owners but also contributes to a larger issue of food waste and sustainability.

    • Sell-by dates on food labels are guidelines for optimal freshness, not hard expiration dates40% of food waste in the US occurs due to sell-by dates at the grocery store level, consumers should use their senses to determine food freshness

      The sell-by dates on food labels, such as milk, are not hard expiration dates. Instead, they are guidelines for optimal freshness. In Montana, for instance, these dates are considered throw-away dates, and grocery stores cannot sell milk past its sell-by date. This practice leads to significant food waste, with 86% of consumers reportedly throwing away food based on these dates. Food manufacturers voluntarily add these dates, and they can be confusing for consumers. Food expert Emily Brodleb emphasizes that around 40% of food waste in the US occurs at the grocery store level due to these dates. Therefore, it's essential to understand that these dates do not necessarily mean the food is no longer safe to consume. Instead, consumers can use their senses and judgment to determine the freshness of their food.

    • Uncertainty around food expiration dates leads to confusion and food wasteFood expiration labels contribute to consumer confusion and unnecessary food waste due to inconsistent and arbitrary date requirements.

      The complexity and confusion surrounding food expiration dates contributes significantly to food waste in the United States. With numerous phrases like Best Buy, Used By, Sell By, and Expires On, consumers are left uncertain about the meaning of these labels and may unnecessarily discard food based on misinterpretation. This issue arose as people started buying more food from grocery stores instead of farms, leading to a demand for clearer information about food's freshness and age. Initially, closed dating codes were used, which meant nothing to consumers, but by the 1970s, open dating became the norm. However, which foods received a date requirement was arbitrary, leading to inconsistency and continued confusion. Manufacturers, wanting to protect their brand and ensure consumers eat food at its best, have contributed to the proliferation of various expiration date labels. Ultimately, the inconsistency and confusion surrounding food expiration dates result in unnecessary food waste and added costs for consumers.

    • Food date labels and their regulations differ greatlyTrust your senses for most foods, but check dates for prepared, milk, cheese, raw fish, and in Montana for milk only due to specific regulations.

      Food date labels and their regulations vary greatly from state to state, with some requiring strict adherence to dates and others having no requirements at all. This inconsistency suggests that these dates may not be primarily based on food safety. Emily, a food safety expert, advises that for most foods, using your senses to judge freshness is a reliable alternative. However, there are exceptions, such as prepared foods, milk, cheese, and raw fish, where dates should be checked. Montana, specifically, has a unique regulation called "milk control," which enforces a 12-day sell-by-date for milk. This rule, originally implemented in the 1980s, is based on milk freshness rather than safety. Despite advancements in pasteurization technology, the rule remains in place. In essence, food date labels are not always about safety, and consumers should trust their senses when possible.

    • Montana's Milk Sell-By Rule Benefits Local DairiesMontana's 12-day milk sell-by rule drives demand for local milk, acts as a de facto subsidy, and shields the industry from out-of-state competition, resulting in 100% Montana-sourced milk.

      Montana's milk sell-by date rule, which requires a 12-day window for selling milk within the state, has inadvertently created a significant advantage for local dairies and processors. This rule leads to increased demand for milk, benefiting the roughly 45-50 dairy farms in the state. Additionally, it acts as a sort-of subsidy, as out-of-state milk producers face logistical challenges in selling their milk in Montana due to the 12-day window. As a result, almost 100% of milk in Montana comes from Montana sources. This rule, which was not initially intended to be a subsidy, effectively shields the local industry from outside competition.

    • Montana's 12-day sell-by-date rule: Protecting farmers, increasing pricesMontana's 12-day sell-by-date rule protects local dairy farmers from oversupply but can lead to higher milk prices and limited competition due to transportation costs for out-of-state milk. Advancements in technology may make the rule obsolete.

      The 12-day sell-by-date rule in Montana has both positive and negative effects on the dairy industry and consumers. On one hand, it protects local dairy farmers by ensuring they have a consistent buyer for their milk, preventing a potential oversupply situation. On the other hand, it can lead to higher milk prices due to limited competition and increased transportation costs for out-of-state milk. Additionally, the rule may no longer be necessary as advancements in technology allow milk to be stored and transported more efficiently, reducing the need for local processing. The rule also has historical significance, as it was once beneficial for both dairy manufacturers and grocery stores, allowing them to easily swap out expiring milk for fresh supplies. However, with the closure of local processing plants producing cottage cheeses, sour cream, and ice cream, the benefit of the rule has diminished. Ultimately, the impact of the 12-day sell-by-date rule on milk prices and availability depends on various economic factors and industry developments.

    • Montana's strict milk sell-by rule leads to food wasteMontana's 12-day sell-by rule for milk results in food waste and disposal of good milk. Clear labels like 'best if used by' and 'used by' could reduce confusion and waste.

      Montana's 12-day sell-by rule for milk led to food waste and the disposal of perfectly good milk. Greg Hertz, a dairy farmer and state lawmaker in Montana, has been trying to change this rule since 2015. Despite his colleagues' support in other areas, they have not backed him on this issue due to their allegiance to the dairy farming industry. The rule prevents retailers from selling milk after 12 days, and even donating it was against state law. Hertz believes that grocery stores should not have to make a choice between breaking the law and wasting milk. The consensus among various stakeholders, including food experts and federal food agencies, is that using clear labels such as "best if used by" and "used by" would reduce confusion and food waste.

    • Understanding Expiration Dates: Preventing Food WasteBeing aware of 'best by' and 'used by' dates can help prevent food waste and ensure optimal freshness, while rescuing expiring items from grocery stores can reduce waste and benefit those in need.

      Understanding expiration dates, whether it's for mayonnaise or milk, can help consumers make informed decisions about their food. In the discussed podcast, the speaker shared an experience of rescuing expiring milk from a grocery store, emphasizing the importance of selling or consuming such items before they go to waste. The podcast also touched upon the concept of "best by" and "used by" dates, explaining that while "best by" indicates optimal freshness, "used by" signifies the last day the product is recommended for consumption. The podcast episode was produced by James Snead, and applications for the next Planet Money internship were encouraged. The episode concluded with a shoutout to Feeding San Diego, an organization that rescues food from grocery stores to reduce waste and help those in need. Overall, the podcast episode highlighted the significance of being aware of expiration dates and the importance of preventing food waste.

    Recent Episodes from Planet Money

    Do immigrants really take jobs and lower wages?

    Do immigrants really take jobs and lower wages?
    We wade into the heated debate over immigrants' impact on the labor market. When the number of workers in a city increases, does that take away jobs from the people who already live and work there? Does a surge of immigration hurt their wages?

    The debate within the field of economics often centers on Nobel-prize winner David Card's ground-breaking paper, "The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market." Today on the show: the fight over that paper, and what it tells us about the debate over immigration.

    More Listening:
    - When The Boats Arrive
    - The Men on the Roof

    This episode was hosted by Amanda Aronczyk and Jeff Guo. It was produced by Willa Rubin, edited by Annie Brown, and engineered by Valentina Rodríguez Sánchez. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Planet Money
    enJune 29, 2024

    The Carriage Tax (Update)

    The Carriage Tax (Update)
    (Note: A version of this episode originally ran in 2019.)

    In 1794, George Washington decided to raise money for the federal government by taxing the rich. He did it by putting a tax on horse-drawn carriages.

    The carriage tax could be considered the first federal wealth tax of the United States. It led to a huge fight over the power to tax in the U.S. Constitution, a fight that continues today.

    Listen back to our 2019 episode: "Could A Wealth Tax Work?"

    Listen to The Indicator's 2023 episode: "Could SCOTUS outlaw wealth taxes?"

    This episode was hosted by Greg Rosalsky and Bryant Urstadt. It was originally produced by Nick Fountain and Liza Yeager, with help from Sarah Gonzalez. Today's update was produced by Willa Rubin and edited by Molly Messick and our executive producer, Alex Goldmark.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 26, 2024

    The Vapes of Wrath

    The Vapes of Wrath
    When the vape brand Juul first hit the market back in 2015, e-cigarettes were in a kind of regulatory limbo. At the time, the rules that governed tobacco cigarettes did not explicitly apply to e-cigarettes. Then Juul blew up, fueled a public health crisis over teen vaping, and inspired a regulatory crackdown. But when the government finally stepped in to solve the problem of youth vaping, it may have actually made things worse.

    Today's episode is a collaboration with the new podcast series "Backfired: the Vaping Wars." You can listen to the full series at audible.com/Backfired.

    This episode was hosted by Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi and Leon Neyfakh. It was produced by Emma Peaslee and edited by Jess Jiang with help from Annie Brown. It was fact checked by Sofia Shchukina and engineered by Cena Loffredo. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 21, 2024

    Why is everyone talking about Musk's money?

    Why is everyone talking about Musk's money?
    We've lived amongst Elon Musk headlines for so long now that it's easy to forget just how much he sounds like a sci-fi character. He runs a space company and wants to colonize mars. He also runs a company that just implanted a computer chip into a human brain. And he believes there's a pretty high probability everything is a simulation and we are living inside of it.

    But the latest Elon Musk headline-grabbing drama is less something out of sci-fi, and more something pulled from HBO's "Succession."

    Elon Musk helped take Tesla from the brink of bankruptcy to one of the biggest companies in the world. And his compensation for that was an unprecedentedly large pay package that turned him into the richest person on Earth. But a judge made a decision about that pay package that set off a chain of events resulting in quite possibly the most expensive, highest stakes vote in publicly traded company history.

    The ensuing battle over Musk's compensation is not just another wild Elon tale. It's a lesson in how to motivate the people running the biggest companies that – like it or not – are shaping our world. It's a classic economics problem with a very 2024 twist.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 19, 2024

    What's with all the tiny soda cans? And other grocery store mysteries, solved.

    What's with all the tiny soda cans? And other grocery store mysteries, solved.
    There's a behind the scenes industry that helps big brands decide questions like: How big should a bag of chips be? What's the right size for a bottle of shampoo? And yes, also: When should a company do a little shrinkflation?

    From Cookie Monster to President Biden, everybody is complaining about shrinkflation these days. But when we asked the packaging and pricing experts, they told us that shrinkflation is just one move in a much larger, much weirder 4-D chess game.

    The name of that game is "price pack architecture." This is the idea that you shouldn't just sell your product in one or two sizes. You should sell your product in a whole range of different sizes, at a whole range of different price points. Over the past 15 years, price pack architecture has completely changed how products are marketed and sold in the United States.

    Today, we are going on a shopping cart ride-along with one of those price pack architects. She's going to pull back the curtain and show us why some products are getting larger while others are getting smaller, and tell us about the adorable little soda can that started it all.

    By the end of the episode, you'll never look at a grocery store the same way again.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 14, 2024

    Bringing a tariff to a graphite fight

    Bringing a tariff to a graphite fight
    Graphite is sort of the one-hit wonder of minerals. And that hit? Pencils. Everyone loves to talk about pencils when it comes to graphite. If graphite were to perform a concert, they'd close out the show with "pencils," and everyone would clap and cheer. But true fans of graphite would be shouting out "batteries!" Because graphite is a key ingredient in another important thing that we all use in our everyday lives: lithium ion batteries.

    Almost all of the battery-ready graphite in the world comes from one place: China. That's actually true of lots of the materials that go into batteries, like processed lithium and processed cobalt. Which is why it was such a big deal when, earlier this year, President Biden announced a tariff package that will make a bunch of Chinese imports more expensive. Included in this package are some tariffs on Chinese graphite. He wants to create a new battery future—one that doesn't rely so much on China.

    In this episode, we get down on the ground to look at this big supply chain story through the lens of one critical mineral. And we visit a small town that realizes that it might be the perfect place to create an American graphite industry. And we find that declaring a new battery future is one thing, but making it happen is another thing entirely.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Planet Money
    enJune 12, 2024

    How much national debt is too much?

    How much national debt is too much?
    Most economic textbooks will tell you that there can be real dangers in running up a big national debt. A major concern is how the debt you add now could slow down economic growth in the future. Economists have not been able to nail down how much debt a country can safely take on. But they have tried.

    Back in 2010, two economists took a look at 20 countries over the course of decades, and sometimes centuries, and came back with a number. Their analysis suggested that economic growth slowed significantly once national debt passed 90% of annual GDP... and that is when the fight over debt and growth really took off.

    On today's episode: a deep dive on what we know, and what we don't know, about when exactly national debt becomes a problem. We will also try to figure out how worried we should be about the United States' current debt total of 26 trillion dollars.

    This episode was hosted by Keith Romer and Nick Fountain. It was produced by Willa Rubin and edited by Molly Messick. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez with help from Sofia Shchukina and engineered by Cena Loffredo. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 07, 2024

    The history of light (classic)

    The history of light (classic)
    For thousands of years, getting light was a huge hassle. You had to make candles from scratch. This is not as romantic as it sounds. You had to get a cow, raise the cow, feed the cow, kill the cow, get the fat out of the cow, cook the fat, dip wicks into the fat. All that--for not very much light. Now, if we want to light a whole room, we just flip a switch.

    The history of light explains why the world today is the way it is. It explains why we aren't all subsistence farmers, and why we can afford to have artists and massage therapists and plumbers. (And, yes, people who make podcasts about the history of light.) The history of light is the history of economic growth--of things getting faster, cheaper, and more efficient.

    On today's show: How we got from dim little candles made out of cow fat, to as much light as we want at the flick of a switch.

    Today's show was hosted by Jacob Goldstein and David Kestenbaum. It was originally produced by Caitlin Kenney and Damiano Marchetti. Today's rerun was produced by James Sneed, and edited by Jenny Lawton. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Engineering by Valentina Rodríguez Sánchez. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 05, 2024

    How the FBI's fake cell phone company put criminals into real jail cells

    How the FBI's fake cell phone company put criminals into real jail cells
    There is a constant arms race between law enforcement and criminals, especially when it comes to technology. For years, law enforcement has been frustrated with encrypted messaging apps, like Signal and Telegram. And law enforcement has been even more frustrated by encrypted phones, specifically designed to thwart authorities from snooping.

    But in 2018, in a story that seems like it's straight out of a spy novel, the FBI was approached with an offer: Would they like to get into the encrypted cell phone business? What if they could convince criminals to use their phones to plan and document their crimes — all while the FBI was secretly watching? It could be an unprecedented peek into the criminal underground.

    To pull off this massive sting operation, the FBI needed to design a cell phone that criminals wanted to use and adopt. Their mission: to make a tech platform for the criminal underworld. And in many ways, the FBI's journey was filled with all the hallmarks of many Silicon Valley start-ups.

    On this show, we talk with journalist Joseph Cox, who wrote a new book about the FBI's cell phone business, called Dark Wire. And we hear from the federal prosecutor who became an unlikely tech company founder.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Planet Money
    enMay 31, 2024

    So you've been scammed, now what?

    So you've been scammed, now what?
    We are living in a kind of golden age for online fraudsters. As the number of apps and services for storing and sending money has exploded – so too have the schemes that bad actors have cooked up to steal that money. Every year, we hear more and more stories of financial heartbreak. What you don't often hear about is what happens after the scam?

    On today's show, we follow one woman who was scammed out of over $800,000 on her quest to get her money back. That journey takes her from the halls of the FBI to the fraud departments of some of the country's biggest financial institutions. And it offers a window into how the systems that are theoretically designed to help the victims of financial cybercrime actually work in practice.

    This episode was hosted by Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi and Jeff Guo. It was produced by Willa Rubin and edited by Keith Romer. It was engineered by Neal Rauch and fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enMay 29, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Reimagining Food Waste: Future Thought Leaders Series Presented by the Berry Good Food Foundation

    Reimagining Food Waste: Future Thought Leaders Series Presented by the Berry Good Food Foundation
    Food waste in the United States is at an all-time high. More than 40 percent of all edible food is tossed out each year and half of that is fresh but slightly imperfect produce. What to do? A panel of experts convened by Kitchens for Good and the Berry Good Food Foundation explores how to reverse this trend by connecting suppliers with those who will benefit most from increased access to healthy foods. This is the third of four programs presented by the Future Thought Leaders series. Series: "Climate Solutions " [Health and Medicine] [Agriculture] [Show ID: 30712]

    Revisiting the cost of food waste on our planet

    Revisiting the cost of food waste on our planet

    Americans waste about $408bn in food every year but the most significant consequence of food waste is not financial. Pollution from methane gas generated at landfills accounts for about 8 to 10 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.

    Today, we are re-exploring food waste – how to avoid it and what steps local and national governments in the United States are taking to solve the problem.

    In this episode: 

    • Madeline Keating, city strategist, Healthy People and Thriving Communities Program at NRDC (@NRDC)
    • Kristyn Oldendorf, chief of the Office of Waste Diversion for the Department of Public Works, Baltimore (@BaltimoreDPW)
    • Marvin Hayes, youth program manager, Baltimore Compost Collective (@bmorecompost)

    Episode credits:

    This episode was updated by Ney Alvarez. The original production team was Alexandra Locke, Negin Owliaei, Amy Walters, Ney Alvarez, Priyanka Tilve, Ruby Zaman, Tom Fenton, Stacey Samuel and our host, Malika Bilal. Our production team also includes Chloe K Li and Ashish Malhotra. Our sound designer is Alex Roldan. Our engagement producers are Aya Elmileik and Adam Abou-Gad. Ney Alvarez is Al Jazeera’s head of audio. 

    Connect with us:

    @AJEPodcasts on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook

     

    Optimizing Food Waste Recovery through Algorithms, with Maen Mahfoud

    Optimizing Food Waste Recovery through Algorithms, with Maen Mahfoud

    Food Waste is a Global Problem with a Big Carbon Footprint

    One-third of all food produced is wasted every year – approximately 1.3 billion tons. The UN Environment Program estimates that 3.3 billion tons of CO2 are emitted annually from the resources used to produce wasted food. In the United States alone, 133 billion pounds of edible food, valued at $161 billion, is wasted every year. 

    Replate’s Solution

    Enter Replate: a technology-based nonprofit that works to reduce food insecurity and waste while mitigating food waste´s effects on climate change. The organization provides a solution for businesses to donate surplus food to nearby nonprofits operating throughout the United States and the Middle East. Replate’s services are designed to prevent such food waste through source reduction and donating meals to communities experiencing food insecurity. Its algorithm connects donor organizations to nonprofits, diverting food from landfills while increasing food access. 

    How Replate Works

    Their organization operates through a web app. Donors can schedule pick-up services, then track the environmental and social impact of their donations. Nonprofits can sign up to receive donations using an online form. Replate then works to understand these organizations' capacity and food needs before drop off. Replate works with hundreds of corporations including Netflix, Boston Consulting Group, Whole Foods, Chipotle, Walmart, and more to match businesses with communities in need. Since its founding, Replate has recovered over 3.6 million pounds of food, delivered over three million meals, and served 301 nonprofits. It estimates that to date the program has saved 985 million gallons of water and diverted 3,686 tons of carbon emissions.

    Connections to California Composting Goals

    As organic material like food and agricultural waste decomposes, it releases methane, a greenhouse gas eighty-four times more potent than carbon dioxide in the atmosphere over a 20-year period. Enacted in January 2022, California’s Short-Lived Pollutant Reduction law SB-1383 targets is trying to address methane emissions due to organic waste. SB-1383 is expected to reduce California’s methane emissions from organic materials in traditional landfills by an estimated twenty percent. As part of the law, large food service providers, distributors, and industries falling under the Tier 1 category—food service providers, food distributors, wholesale food vendors, supermarkets and grocery stores over 10,000 square feet—are required to reduce their organic waste material disposal. Platforms like Replate can help businesses reduce their food waste and comply with SB-1383. 

    Maen Mahfoud is the founder and CEO of Replate. Witnessing the alarming levels of food insecurity, and enormous amounts of food waste in the Bay Area, his knowledge of the massive effects of food waste on our planet motivated Mahfoud to launch Replate in 2016. Maen is a DRK entrepreneur, a 2023 recipient of the James Irvine Foundation Leadership, and was sponsored by Harvard Business School's Executive Program. Mahfoud holds a Master’s in Public Health from Imperial College London, a degree in Molecular Biology from UC Berkeley, and a Human-Computer Interaction for User Experience Design Certificate from MIT. 

     

    For a transcript, please visit https://climatebreak.org/optimizing-food-waste-recovery-through-algorithms-with-maen-mahfoud/

    A Healthier City and Food Waste

    A Healthier City and Food Waste

    1 out of 7 people in Vancouver is facing food insecurity.

    Michelle Reining is the Executive Director of Vancouver Food Runners, a non-profit organization working to reduce food waste and tackling food insecurity in Vancouver area. She and our CEO Drew Munro talk about the importance of food waste, food insecurity and how each of us can participate to make a difference.

    S1 | E1 - Matt Preston

    S1 | E1 - Matt Preston
    This week Matt Preston joins Phoebe Wood for an depth chat about the no-waste movement. Matt was a Masterchef Australia judge for 11 years and has been a senior editor at delicious for 18 years. He’s a self-appointed ambassador for the plight of kiwi fruit, and has an encyclopaedic knowledge of food – which makes him perfect for a discussion on no-waste techniques to apply at home For more information visit www.delicious.com.au/podcast  

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.