Logo
    Search

    Biocidal Products Committee: Nitrogen generated from ambient air as a low-risk active substance

    enMarch 03, 2023

    About this Episode

    This episode gives you the highlights from the March meeting of our Biocidal Products Committee. Our guest is the Chair of the Committee, Erik van de Plassche.

    The main topic of the episode is the nitrogen generated from ambient air. We cover the main points of discussion and motivation for the committee’s opinion.


    Background

    The Committee prepares scientific opinions for the European Commission on biocidal active substances and on EU-wide authorisations of biocidal products. 


    Full episode transcript (coming soon)


    More

    Highlights from March BPC meeting 


    ************** 

    Give us feedback

    Subscribe to our YouTube channel
    Subscribe to our Safer Chemicals Podcast
    Subscribe to our news

    Follow us on:
    *Twitter
    *Facebook
    *LinkedIn

    Visit our website 


     

    Recent Episodes from Safer Chemicals Podcast

    Joining forces for humans, animals, environment: One Health - Part 2

    Joining forces for humans, animals, environment: One Health - Part 2

    Our wellbeing depends on the health of animals, plants and our environment. What affects one affects all the others, and increasingly so.


    A One Health perspective is about joining forces to find integrated solutions to common challenges such as climate change and antibiotic resistance.


    Join us to hear from experts at five EU scientific agencies about how we can put One Health into practice. Whether it's safeguarding access to life-saving medicines or combating the next pandemics, a One Health approach will be essential to how our society navigates the future. 


    This is the second of our two part episode with speakers from five EU agencies. Listen to the first episode here.

     

    Host

    James Ramsay, Head of Communications - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)


    Guests

    • Carlos das Neves, Chief Scientist - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

    • Wim De Coen, Head of Hazard Assessment at the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

    • Mike Catchpole, Chief Scientist at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)

    • Dario Piselli, Expert in environment and health at the European Environment Agency (EEA)

    • Steffen Thirstrup, Chief Medical Officer at the European Medicines Agency (EMA)


    Check our website and stay updated by subscribing to our newsletter.


    Useful links 


    **************


    Follow us on:


    Visit our website 


    Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication.  

    Joining forces for humans, animals, environment: One Health - Part 1

    Joining forces for humans, animals, environment: One Health - Part 1

    Our wellbeing depends on the health of animals, plants and our environment. What affects one affects all the others, and increasingly so.


    A One Health perspective is about joining forces to find integrated solutions to common challenges such as climate change and antibiotic resistance.


    Join us to hear from experts at five EU scientific agencies about how we can put One Health into practice. Whether it's safeguarding access to life-saving medicines or combating the next pandemics, a One Health approach will be essential to how our society navigates the future. 


    This is the first of our two part episode with speakers from five EU agencies.

     

    Host

    James Ramsay, Head of Communications - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)


    Guests

    • Carlos das Neves, Chief Scientist - European Food Safety Authority (EFSA)

    • Wim De Coen, Head of Hazard Assessment at the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)

    • Mike Catchpole, Chief Scientist at the European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC)

    • Dario Piselli, Expert in environment and health at the European Environment Agency (EEA)

    • Steffen Thirstrup, Chief Medical Officer at the European Medicines Agency (EMA)


    Check our website and stay updated by subscribing to our newsletter.


    Useful links 


    **************


    Follow us on:


    Visit our website 


    Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication.  

    EU enforcement project: excessive levels of harmful chemicals found in consumer products

    EU enforcement project: excessive levels of harmful chemicals found in consumer products

    Welcome to the Safer Chemicals Podcast. In this episode, we explore an EU enforcement project that revealed concerning levels of banned chemicals in everyday consumer goods across Europe. The findings? A significant 18% non-compliance rate in various items like electrical devices, sports gear, toys, and fashion products.


    Join us as we discuss the project's key discoveries and recommendations with experts Karin Rumar and Maciej Baranski. They shed light on the presence of harmful substances like phthalates, lead, and cadmium in these items, and how enforcement measures were taken to address non-compliant products.


    The project's recommendations for industry emphasise the responsibility of companies in ensuring product safety. They advocate for heightened awareness, risk-based compliance checks, and stringent assessments to prevent hazardous chemicals in consumer goods.


    Check our website for the full report and stay updated on future initiatives by subscribing to our newsletter.


    Useful links


    **************


    Follow us on:


    Visit our website 


    Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication.  

    Unpacking 5 600 comments on PFAS restriction: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committee highlights

    Unpacking 5 600 comments on PFAS restriction: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committee highlights

    Welcome to the Safer Chemicals Podcast. Join host Adam Elwan as he delves into the work of the European Chemicals Agency's scientific committees. In this episode, we talk about the record number of comments received for the proposed restriction of PFAS and the harmonised classification of tea tree oil.


    Discover the unprecedented public engagement as we explore the analysis of over 5 600 comments received on the proposed PFAS restriction. Our experts, Roberto Scazzola and Maria Ottati, shed light on the extensive input from various sectors, offering insights into the diverse perspectives and key concerns highlighted by industry experts and individuals alike.


    From electronic and semiconductor industries to discussions on cosmetics and textiles, we dig deeper into the breadth of feedback received and its potential impact on regulatory decisions.


    Stay tuned as the Risk Assessment Committee addresses the evaluation of tea tree oil, discussing its potential impact on various sectors including fragrances, cosmetics, and plant protection products.


    Join us for a deep dive into the world of chemical oversight, scientific opinions, and the profound impact of public input on shaping regulatory decisions. Subscribe to stay updated on our upcoming episodes covering crucial findings and insights on chemical regulations and safety.


    What the committees do


    The two committees prepare scientific opinions that are used by the European Commission and EU Member States when deciding how chemical risks need to be controlled. They are made up of scientists from EU Member States and have observers from EU organisations that represent different sectors and interests.


    Useful links


    More

    **************

    Follow us on:

    Visit our website 


    Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication. 

    Biocidal Products Committee: Data gaps slowing down substance approvals and product authorisations

    Biocidal Products Committee: Data gaps slowing down substance approvals and product authorisations

    Join Päivi Jokiniemi and Joost van Galen in this episode of the Safer Chemicals Podcast.


    The episode focuses on the most important outcomes of the November meeting of our Biocidal Products Committee. Joost tells, for example, about the adopted Union authorisation opinions and explains why the Committee will continue discussing its opinion on an active substance application for bronopol in an additional virtual meeting in December 2023. He also raises the issue of data gaps and gives tips to companies on how to avoid them.


    What the Biocidal Products Committee does:

    The Committee prepares scientific opinions for the European Commission on biocidal active substances and on EU-wide authorisations of biocidal products.


    Full episode transcript 


    More 


    Give us feedback 


    **************

    Follow us on:

    Visit our website 


    Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication.  

    Safer Chemicals Podcast
    enNovember 27, 2023

    Bridging the gap between scientific research and chemicals regulation

    Bridging the gap between scientific research and chemicals regulation

    In this episode of the Safer Chemicals Podcast, we take you on a deep dive into the world of chemical safety with a spotlight on scientific research needs for the regulatory risk assessment of chemicals.


    Päivi Jokiniemi speaks with ECHA's experts, Wim De Coen and Fleur van Broekhuizen, who give insights into the significance of scientific research in chemical regulation. Together, they explore the fundamental questions: Why is scientific research crucial for EU chemicals regulation, and what is ECHA doing to address the ever-evolving challenges in this field?


    Learn why scientific research is the cornerstone of ECHA's efforts, enabling the identification of chemical hazards, assessment of risks, and ensuring regulatory compliance.


    Get an inside look at ECHA's collaborative approach, where engagement with the scientific community is paramount. Understand how ECHA actively cooperates with researchers, fostering dialogue and knowledge exchange to drive chemical safety.


    Explore the Partnership for the Assessment of Risks from Chemicals (PARC), an initiative that allocates substantial funding to research projects aimed at enhancing regulatory practices and improving chemical safety.


    Discover the key areas of regulatory challenge highlighted in ECHA's recent report and gain insights into how increased scientific research can provide better protection against harmful chemicals, address chemical pollution in the natural environment, shift away from animal testing, and improve the availability of chemical data.


    Wim works as a head of unit in our Hazard Assessment Directorate and Fleur in the team coordinating ECHA's activities under PARC. 


    Useful links

    More

    **************

    Follow us on:

    Visit our website 


    Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication. 

    Banning creosote-treated wood: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committee highlights

    Banning creosote-treated wood: Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committee highlights

    Join Adam Elwan in the latest episode of the Safer Chemicals Podcast as he welcomes the new Chair of the Risk Assessment Committee, Roberto Scazzola, and Maria Ottati, Chair of the Socio-Economic Analysis Committee. 


    They talk about the ongoing evaluation of the universal PFAS restriction proposal, France's proposal to restrict creosote-treated wood, the impact of new CLP hazard classes, and more. 


    Get the latest updates on chemical risk assessment and regulation in Europe.


    What the committees do


    The two committees prepare scientific opinions that are used by the European Commission and EU Member States when deciding how chemical risks need to be controlled. They are made up of scientists from EU Member States and have observers from EU organisations that represent different sectors and interests.


    Useful links


    More


    **************

    Follow us on:

    Visit our website 


    Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication.  

    Biocidal Products Committee: New Chair's outlook on future challenges

    Biocidal Products Committee: New Chair's outlook on future challenges

    After the summer break, the Biocidal Products Committee is back in business discussing the latest active substance and Union authorisation cases. 


    In this episode, we will introduce Joost van Galen, the new Chair of the committee, who tells about his background and how it has prepared him for this new role. He also shares his thoughts about the main challenges that the committee will be facing in the coming years. In addition, we cover the most important opinions that the committee concluded on during the
    September meeting.  


    What the Biocidal Products Committee does


    The Committee prepares scientific opinions for the European Commission on biocidal active substances and on EU-wide authorisations of biocidal products.


    More

    Highlights from September Biocidal Products Commitee meeting  - ECHA news update, 20 September 2023

    Biocidal Products Committee  


    **************
    Subscribe to our YouTube channel
    Subscribe to our Safer Chemicals Podcast
    Subscribe to our news

    Follow us on:
    *Twitter
    *Facebook
    *LinkedIn

    Visit our website

    Disclaimer:
    Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication.

    ECHA's committees in focus: Tim Bowmer reflects on 11 years as Chair, PFAS restrictions, and future outlook

    ECHA's committees in focus: Tim Bowmer reflects on 11 years as Chair, PFAS restrictions, and future outlook

    Welcome to the Safer Chemicals Podcast, where we delve into the world of chemical risk management. In this episode, we speak with Tim Bowmer and Maria Ottati, Chairs of ECHA's Risk Assessment and Socio-Economic Analysis Committees. 


    They update us on the universal PFAS restriction proposal, an ambitious initiative to minimise the release of persistent chemicals. Tim Bowmer also reflects on his impressive 11 years as Chair and sheds light on the evolving regulatory landscape. 


    Join us as we explore the latest developments and discuss the future challenges faced by ECHA's committees.


    What the committees do

    The two committees prepare scientific opinions that are used by the European Commission and EU Member States when deciding how chemical risks need to be controlled. They are made up of scientists from EU Member States and have observers from EU organisations that represent different sectors and interests.


    Useful links


    More


    **************

    Follow us on:

    Visit our website 


    Disclaimer: Views expressed by interviewees do not necessarily represent the official position of the European Chemicals Agency. All content is up to date at the time of publication. 

    Enforcement Forum's impact and future: insights from the Forum's outgoing Chair

    Enforcement Forum's impact and future: insights from the Forum's outgoing Chair

    Join us in this episode of the Safer Chemicals Podcast as we explore the latest developments from the Enforcement Forum of the European Chemicals Agency (ECHA). 


    In conversation with Katja vom Hofe, the outgoing Chair of the Forum, we reflect on the achievements and challenges faced in promoting chemical safety and enforcement.


    Discover how the Forum's collaborative efforts have shaped the future of chemical regulation in Europe and learn about the upcoming REACH enforcement project, REF-13. 


    We dive into the topic of enforcing chemical products sold online, exploring the scope, impact, and potential changes in legislation.


    Don't miss this opportunity to gain insights from Katja, an expert with a unique perspective from leading the Forum for many years and discover how enforcement authorities are working together to ensure compliance and protect consumers in the digital age.


    What the Forum does
    The Forum and the BPRS are a network of enforcement authorities from the EU and EEA. They are responsible for coordinating the enforcement of REACH, CLP, PIC, POPs and BPR chemicals legislation. Their aim is to protect peoples’ health and the environment while ensuring a level playing field for companies on the EU market.


    Useful links