Logo
    Search

    Coronavirus: How Scary Are the Variants?

    enApril 02, 2021

    Podcast Summary

    • Impact of new variants on vaccine effectivenessPeople feel relieved after getting vaccinated but uncertainty remains about new variants and safe activities post-immunity, emphasizing the importance of staying informed and understanding various areas of expertise.

      While the arrival of vaccines brings a sense of relief and hope, there is still confusion and concern about the impact of new variants on their effectiveness. People who have received their shots express feelings of relief and a renewed sense of normalcy, but there is ongoing uncertainty about what activities are safe once full immunity is achieved. The emergence of new variants, some of which may be more deadly and contagious, has raised questions about the long-term success of vaccination efforts. The discussion on Science Versus also touches on the importance of staying informed about scientific developments and the value of understanding different areas of expertise, as exemplified by the podcast Ologies.

    • Israel's rapid vaccination campaign reduces risk of UK COVID-19 variantIsrael's vaccination campaign using Pfizer reduced risk of UK COVID-19 variant by 60% after first dose and over 90% after second dose.

      Israel's rapid vaccination campaign using the Pfizer vaccine, which saw over 150,000 adults being vaccinated daily, significantly reduced the risk of getting sick from the UK COVID-19 variant. Dr. Ben Rees and his team conducted a study involving over a million adults, comparing vaccinated individuals with unvaccinated ones. The results showed that around 2-3 weeks after the first dose, vaccinated individuals had a 60% lower risk of getting sick. This number increased to over 90% effectiveness a week after the second dose. The Pfizer vaccine, along with other vaccines like Novavax and AstraZeneca, have shown promising results in protecting against the UK strain. However, there have been concerns regarding the AstraZeneca vaccine and potential blood clots. While around 30 cases have been reported out of almost 2.7 million doses administered in Germany, it's unclear if there's a causal link. Further research is needed to clarify the situation.

    • Understanding the impact and effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against new variantsScientists are researching the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines against new variants to determine the long-term success in fighting off the virus

      The COVID-19 vaccines are remarkably safe, and while there are side effects, they are typically mild and expected. The vaccines are already making a significant impact on people's lives, allowing them to resume activities such as going to the gym and dining out. However, the emergence of new variants of the virus, such as those in the UK, Brazil, and South Africa, poses a threat to the effectiveness of the vaccines. Scientists like Pei Yong Shi, who helped develop the Pfizer vaccine, are working to understand how well the vaccine's antibodies can neutralize these new variants. If the antibodies are effective, then only a small number of them will be needed to fight off the virus. However, if the antibodies are weak, then a larger number will be required. This ongoing research is crucial in determining the long-term success of the vaccines in the face of these emerging variants.

    • The COVID-19 virus is continuously mutating and producing concerning variants like e484k or 'eek'The eek mutation in the COVID-19 virus may allow it to evade current vaccine-induced antibodies, posing a challenge in the fight against the pandemic

      The COVID-19 virus is continuously mutating as it infects more people, leading to the emergence of concerning variants that may evade the protection offered by current vaccines. One such mutation, known as e484k or "eek," has been identified in variants from South Africa, Brazil, the UK, and the US. This mutation affects the spike protein of the virus, which it uses to enter cells. Normally, vaccines stimulate the production of antibodies that can prevent the spike protein from binding to the receptors on our cells. However, the eek mutation may allow the virus to evade these antibodies, making it a cause for concern. The virus' ability to mutate rapidly is a major challenge in the ongoing fight against COVID-19, and scientists are working to develop new vaccines and treatments that can stay ahead of these mutations.

    • The coronavirus is constantly evolving, making vaccines less effectiveNew mutations like E484K in the coronavirus make it harder for antibodies to bind, potentially reducing vaccine effectiveness. Scientists are closely monitoring the situation and some vaccines, like Pfizer's and Johnson & Johnson's, are still providing protection against new variants.

      The coronavirus is constantly mutating, and one particular mutation called E484K is making it harder for antibodies to bind to the virus, making vaccines less effective. This mutation is found in some new variants, like the one that emerged in South Africa, and it's concerning because it could potentially make the vaccines less effective. However, recent studies suggest that some vaccines, like Pfizer's and Johnson & Johnson's, are still providing protection against these variants. It's important to note that the data is still coming in, and scientists are closely monitoring the situation. The battle against the virus continues, and the virus continues to evolve, making it crucial for scientists to stay one step ahead. The mutations are like the virus's way of outsmarting our immune system, and it's a constant race to keep up. It's a reminder of the importance of continued research and the development of new vaccines and treatments. The virus is constantly changing, and we need to be prepared to adapt.

    • Vaccines provide significant protection against severe illness and deaths despite new variantsVaccines offer substantial protection against severe illness and deaths from COVID-19, even against new variants, due to the immune system's response and additional tools like T cells.

      While COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness may vary against new variants, they still provide significant protection against severe illness and deaths. For instance, the Johnson & Johnson and Novavax vaccines showed over 80% effectiveness in preventing severe cases and 100% in preventing deaths in South Africa, where the new variant was prevalent. The AstraZeneca vaccine might not be as effective in preventing mild or moderate cases, but it could still prevent severe disease and deaths. Our immune system's response to the vaccine plays a crucial role in this. When we're exposed to the virus, our immune system, primed by the vaccine, tries to eliminate as many viruses as possible. Even though the vaccine might not completely eradicate the virus, it leaves us with a small amount that may not progress to severe disease. Moreover, our immune system has other tools like T cells that can recognize and eliminate infected cells, making it harder for the virus to evade our immune response. While the emergence of new variants may pose challenges to our vaccination plans, they are not a complete failure. The vaccines still offer substantial protection against severe illness and deaths. The current increase in cases in the US could be due to the spread of new variants and insufficient vaccinations, as well as the continued presence of unvaccinated individuals.

    • Living with COVID-19: Continue Precautions and Adapt to New StrainsWhile vaccines reduce the risk of severe illness and asymptomatic infections, it's crucial to continue wearing masks in public and getting vaccinated to protect others. Adaptation to regular booster shots may be necessary to tackle new strains, as the coronavirus is likely to stay and impact public health.

      While vaccines are effective against the new strains of COVID-19 and reduce the likelihood of asymptomatic infections, it's important to continue taking precautions such as wearing masks in public and getting vaccinated to protect those who are unvaccinated. The coronavirus is likely here to stay, and we may need to adapt to regular booster shots to tackle new strains, similar to how we deal with the flu. Katie, who was vaccinated, feels more comfortable around vaccinated people and has resumed normal activities, but still wears a mask in public. The long-term goal may not be to completely eradicate the virus due to its adaptation to humans. Instead, we must learn to live with it and prioritize vaccination to minimize the impact on public health.

    • Making Progress Against COVID-19A year after the pandemic's onset, we've made significant progress with effective vaccines against new variants, starting from a much better place than before.

      Despite the challenges and hardships of the past year, particularly during the early stages of the pandemic when hospitals were overwhelmed and severe disease was common, we have made significant progress. Katie, from Science Versus, emphasizes that we are not going back to square one, as we now have effective vaccines even against new variants. Though there is still work to be done, we are starting from a much better place than we were a year ago. Additionally, the team at Science Versus released an episode with 121 citations, which can be found on their website, and they shared a photo of their new intern's puppy, Milo, on Instagram. The podcast was produced by Wendy Zuckerman, Rose Rimmler, Nick Del Rose, and Meryl Horn, with help from Michelle Dang and Taylor White. It was edited by Blythe Tyrell, fact-checked by Taylor White, mixed and sound designed by Bumi Hidaka, and featured music by Peter Leonard, Marcus Bergala, Emma Munger, and Bobby Lord. The team expressed gratitude to all the researchers and listeners who contributed to the episode.

    Recent Episodes from Science Vs

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?
    We’re hearing stories of people having amazing, cosmic orgasms. So what buttons are they pressing to do this?? Well, it's just one. The “male G spot,” also called the “P spot,” because that P stands for prostate. Word on the street is that if you touch your prostate in just the right way — BAM — one helluva orgasm. But is that really true? And if you don't have a prostate (ahem, me): are you stuck with your garden variety orgasms? To get to the bottom of this, Science Vs surveyed almost 16,000 people about anal sex and masturbation! We also speak with Dr Dan Dickstein, Dr Tom Gaither and Neuroscientist Dr Nan Wise. Have an idea for a Science Vs episode? Let us know! On Instagram we're Science_Vs, Wendy's Tiktok is @wendyzukerman and our email is sciencevs@gimletmedia.com Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsMind-BlowingOrgasms In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Absolutely cosmic orgasms (04:47) Anal sex is big right now (08:52) What makes the prostate special (12:02) The hole story. The butthole story. (20:19) How to get a cosmic orgasm (29:19) Tips and tricks for great anal sex (34:54) The real G spot This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. A huge thank you to Sam Levang for her help analyzing our data. And Professor Caroline Pukall and Dan Dickstein for your help with our survey questions. Thanks to the researchers we spoke to including Dr Devon Hensel. Thanks to Jack Weinstein, Hunter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 20, 2024

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?
    Protein influencers are big right now, telling us that we're probably missing out on the protein we need — and giving us a bunch of hacks for getting it. Why? They say that eating extra protein helps us build muscle, feel full, and lose weight. So is that true? We talk to kinesiology professor Stuart Phillips and nutrition professor Faidon Magkos.  Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsPROTEIN In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Protein is all the rage right now (02:53) Why protein matters (05:32) How much protein is enough? (11:33) Do you need more protein if you’re working out? (15:06) Is it risky to eat a LOT of protein? (18:46) Should you pound protein right after a workout? (23:09) Protein and weight loss This episode was produced by Rose Rimler and Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Prof. Brad Schoenfeld and Dr. Nicholas Burd. And special thanks to the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 13, 2024

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot
    Today we’re presenting Trillion Dollar Shot, a new series that explores the business story behind the rise of Ozempic and other blockbuster drugs being used for weight loss. The first episode focuses on the Novo Nordisk scientist who invented the compound that paved the way for Ozempic. You can find every episode on The Journal’s show feed. Trillion Dollar Shot is part of The Journal, which is a co-production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. This episode was hosted by Jessica Mendoza, with Bradley Olson. It was produced by Matt Kwong, with help from Jeevika Verma. Additional production from Adrienne Murray Nielsen. The series is edited by Katherine Brewer. Sound design and mixing by Peter Leonard. Mixing for Science Vs by Bobby Lord. Music in this episode by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Theme music by So Wylie, remixed for this series by Peter Leonard. Special thanks to Maria Byrne, Stefanie Ilgenfritz, Kate Linebaugh, Peter Loftus, Sara O’Brien, Enrique Perez De La Rosa, Sarah Platt, Sune Rasumssen, Jonathan Sanders, Nathan Singhapok, Leying Tang, Rolfe Winkler, Liz Essley Whyte, and Tatiana Zamis. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 11, 2024

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?
    Health care for trans kids has been in the spotlight, with battles over what the science says and tons of U.S. states restricting the care that children can get. And then there’s a new report out of the UK, called the Cass Review, saying that a bunch of the evidence that doctors have been relying on to treat trans kids is “remarkably weak.” So what’s going on here? What is the best health care for trans kids? We sort through the science with Professor Stephen Russell, Dr. Cal Horton, and Dr. Ada Cheung. UPDATE 6/6/24: In a previous version of this episode, we said a study was published this year, when it was actually published last year. The episode has been updated. Mental health resources, including suicide lifelines, for around the world: spotify.com/resources Trans Lifeline: A Trans peer support hotline: 1-877-565-8860 Trevor Project: crisis support services to LGBTQ young people: Call 1-866-488-7386 or Text ‘START’ to 678-678 Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsTransKidsCassReviewTranscript  Here are links to our previous episodes about the science of being transgender and misinformation about care for trans kids. In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over care for trans kids (02:45) What to do when a kid wants to change their name and pronouns (13:44) Do puberty blockers help trans kids’ mental health? (20:44) Does hormone therapy help trans people’s mental health? (25:25) How often are people "retransitioning"? This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang and Rose Rimler. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Eva Dasher. Consulting by Rebecca Kling. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Blake Cavve, Dr. Doug VanderLaan, and Dr. Quinnehtukqut McLamore. And a very special thanks to the trans folks and their families we talked to, Christopher Suter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 06, 2024

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup
    More than 150 years ago, just before dino-mania struck, New York City was supposed to get a majestic dinosaur museum full of amazing models of dinos. There would have been nothing like it in the world. Until a bunch of thugs showed up with sledgehammers and smashed every bit of the models to smithereens — and buried it all in Central Park. Today we’re finding out what happened — and WHY. We speak with doctoral researcher Vicky Coules and paleontologist Carl Mehling. SURVEY!! HELP US SCIENCE!! WE NEED YOUR HELP TO UNCOVER THE LAST MYSTERIES OF SEX https://bit.ly/ScienceVsSurvey Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheGreatDinosaurSmashup In this episode, we cover: (00:00) ​​The amazing dino museum we didn’t get to have (03:15) What we knew about dinos in the 1800s (04:57) The famous Crystal Palace dinosaurs (06:48) The plan for the Paleozoic Museum is born (10:40) The Great Dinosaur Smashup of 1871 (12:52) Suspect No. 1: Boss Tweed (17:58) Vicky cracks the case! (26:17) One final mystery — where are the dino pieces?? This episode was produced by Blythe Terrell with help from Wendy Zukerman, R.E. Natowicz, Michelle Dang, Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler and Joel Werner. Editing by Wendy Zukerman. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to everyone we spoke to about this episode, including Gowan Dawson, Robert Peck, Wendy Anthony and Jessica M. Lydon. Also thanks to Jack Weinstein, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 30, 2024

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?
    The Abortion Pill is now the most common way to have an abortion in the US. Yet what exactly happens when you take these pills is shrouded in mystery. Even many doctors don't know how well they work! Today, we're letting the sun shine on the abortion pill. We'll walk you through what happens when you take these pills: what they do to your body, and how safe are they for your physical and mental health? To explore all this - and more - we speak to Dr Sara Whitburn, Professor Oskari Heikinheimo, and Professor Ushma Upadhyay. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheAbortionPiill The Abortion Project's Instagram @theabortionproject Science Vs's Instagram @science_vs If you want to talk to someone - there's some great resources in here: spotify.com/resources In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over the abortion pill  (04:28) How does the abortion pill work?  (09:05) How it feels to take the abortion pill (14:34) How often do people hemorrhage? (21:22) What's "normal" bleeding?  (24:11) Does taking the abortion pill affect your mental health?  (32:02) Why some people prefer the abortion pill This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr. Tiffany Green, Dr. Ned Calonge, Professor Jenny Higgins, Dr. Daniel Aaron, Dr. Beverly Winikoff, and Dr. Abigail Aiken. Also thanks to Lauren Silverman, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 23, 2024

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?
    With the powers of the James Webb Space Telescope, scientists discovered some super weird things in the early Universe, and it's making some nerds question our theory of everything.  This story comes to us from our friends at Unexplainable at Vox Media. Find Unexplainable’s transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsUnexplainable In this episode, we cover: (0:00) Liftoff (01:10) The James Webb Space Telescope  (04:57) Party of the early universe  (08:39) Mysteries of the early galaxies  (15:23) How do we figure it out? This episode was produced by Brian Resnick, with help from Noam Hassenfeld and Meradith Hoddinott, who also manages the Unexplainable team. Editing from Jorge Just, music from Noam, and mixing and sound design from Cristian Ayala. Fact checking from Kelsey Lannin. Mandy Nguyen is searching for new forms of life. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 16, 2024

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky
    Getting your heart broken sucks — and for some of us, it even feels physically painful. So why does it hurt so bad? And what can science tell us about how to get over it? We dive into all of this with neuroscientist Prof. Lucy Brown.  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsHeartbreak In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Heartbreak sucks (07:17) What heartbreak does in the brain (12:14) What heartbreak does in the body (15:07) How to get over heartbreak  The episode does mention abuse. Here are some resources if you’re struggling to move on from abuse:  https://resources.byspotify.com/ https://www.loveisrespect.org/resources/why-am-i-struggling-to-move-on-after-abuse/ This episode was produced by Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Rose Rimler, Meryl Horn, Kaitlyn Sawrey and Lexi Krupp. Editing by Caitlin Kenney and Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly and Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, and Bobby Lord. A huge thanks to all the scientists we got in touch with for this episode, including Professor Larry Young, Professor Tiffany Field, Professor Ethan Kross, Professor Sandra Langeslag, and Professor Naomi Eisenberger. Thanks to Lori Segal. A special thanks to the Zukerman family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes
    Comedian Tig Notaro, who just released her fifth comedy special, "Hello Again," joins us for a chat about the science of her comedy: telling us how she builds jokes, and of course sharing a bunch of dumb and fabulous jokes. Enjoy!  Here's our Funniest Joke in the World Episode!!  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTigNotaro In this episode, we cover: (00:00) We're interviewing Tig!  (01:22) I could be a comedian?  (02:47) How Tig creates a joke  (08:59) The element of surprise (12:27) The world's funniest joke? (13:55) Tig's favorite jokes This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Funniest Joke in the World

    The Funniest Joke in the World
    If you Google "The Funniest Joke in the World," you'll be very disappointed. The internet might serve you something like, "What has many keys but can't open a single lock??” (Answer: A piano). Screw that. That's not funny. Enter Science Vs. We’re going on a romp to find out once and for all: What is the funniest joke in the world. According to science. And for this quest we've interviewed a bunch of amazing comics including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Dr Jason Leong, Loni Love, as well as special guest Latif Nasser of Radiolab and, of course, some scientists: Neuroscientist Professor Sophie Scott and Psychologist Professor Richard Wiseman. Which Joke Will Win???    Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsFunniestJoke In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The Quest Begins (08:40) Why laughing matters (13:13) The scientific search for the world's funniest joke (17:40) Woof, quack or moo? (21:33) The comedy K (26:30) Do different cultures have different senses of humour? (28:27) The winner! (32:15) Scientific theories of humour (lol) (38:28) Why the winning joke isn't funny (40:26) How do you stop a dog from humping your leg?  (44:43) Meet the comedy gods This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Joel Werner, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Sarah Baum. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, So Wylie, and Bobby Lord. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr Andrew Farkas, Professor Penny MacDonald, Dr Maggie Prenger and a huge thank you to Professor Chris Westbury for sharing your amazing spreadsheet!! Thanks to all the comedians we interviewed in this episode including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Loni Love, Takashi Wakasugi, Urooj Ashfaq, Dr Jason Leong, Penny Greenhalgh and Mohammed Magdi. Another big thanks to Lindsay Farber, Roland Campos, Lauren LoGiudice, Andrea Jones-Rooy and the other comics at The Joke Lab; and all the comics that we spoke to and couldn't fit into the episode, we really really appreciate you and your time! Thanks to Ben Milam, the Melbourne International Comedy Festival, Stupid Old Studios, Paige Ransbury, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Ep. 720 - Why Feminists Are Miserable

    Ep. 720 - Why Feminists Are Miserable

    Today on the Matt Walsh Show, a New York Times writer provoked outrage among feminists when she published a piece saying that she’s happy about being a mother. Those kinds of shocking and outrageous statements simply cannot be tolerated, apparently. We’ll discuss. Also, Five Headlines, including Rand Paul and Dr. Fauci clashing once again. The CDC director warns about the unspecified dangers of summer camp for children. And another famous celebrity comes out against cancel culture. In our Daily Cancellation, we’ll talk about the media and Hollywood’s brave stand against the racism of the Golden Globes.

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #137 - Paul Offit, M.D.: An expert perspective on COVID-19 vaccines

    #137 - Paul Offit, M.D.: An expert perspective on COVID-19 vaccines
    Paul Offit is a pediatrician specializing in infectious diseases and an expert in virology and vaccine development. He currently serves on the FDA committee overseeing and evaluating COVID-19 vaccines. In this episode, Paul discusses the strategies and major companies pursuing a vaccine against the SARS-CoV-2 virus. He gets into the nuances of the vaccine approval process and its implications for COVID-19 vaccine outlook. Paul also explains potential risks, reveals his own confidence level in safety, and gives insight into protection against reinfection with vaccination. Please note that this episode was recorded 11/05/2020, prior to the 11/09/2020 news release of the Pfizer vaccine update.
     
    We discuss:
    • How Paul’s experience as a child in a chronic care hospital as child informed his path in pediatrics and vaccine development (3:30);
    • Addressing the anti-vaccination sentiment and explaining the fraudulent origins of the anti-vaccination movement (8:00);
    • Lessons and insights from 26 years studying rotavirus and creating a successful rotavirus vaccine (17:00);
    • Developing a new vaccine: the different phases of clinical trials, overall timeline, and financial costs (27:15);
    • Operation Warp Speed: the expedited process of creating a coronavirus vaccine (32:30);
    • Various vaccine strategies—RNA, DNA, virus vector—and the challenges associated (35:00);
    • The Moderna and Pfizer mRNA vaccines: strategy, timeline, and Emergency Use Authorization (41:15);
    • Paul’s confidence level in the safety of the first coronavirus vaccines (48:30);
    • The risks associated with different types of vaccines, and updates on the Johnson & Johnson and Astrazeneca coronavirus vaccines (52:15);
    • What we know about the coronavirus vaccines approved in Russia and China (55:45);
    • The latest on the Merck coronavirus vaccine (57:15);
    • The recombinant/purified protein vaccine approach for coronavirus—big players, risks, and the best vaccine for the elderly (57:45);
    • Attenuated and inactivated vaccine strategies for coronavirus (1:02:00);
    • The genetic drift of SARS-CoV-2: Impacts for protection and vaccine development (1:02:30);
    • Paul’s take on the hypothesis that a previous coronavirus infection offers protection against the novel COVID-19 (1:06:45);
    • Addressing the concern that antibodies fade over time (1:09:15);
    • Blood type and protective against coronavirus (1:13:00);
    • Distribution: the challenge of prioritizing the limited doses of vaccines after approval (1:13:15);
    • Paul’s perspective on COVID-19 vaccine safety (1:16:15);
    • Considerations regarding vaccinating children for coronavirus and the role of a fever immune response (1:21:45);
    • Why vaccine development can be challenging and risks of current COVID-19 strategies (1:29:45); and
    • More.

    Learn more: https://peterattiamd.com/

    Show notes page for this episode: https://peterattiamd.com/pauloffit 

    Subscribe to receive exclusive subscriber-only content: https://peterattiamd.com/subscribe/

    Sign up to receive Peter's email newsletter: https://peterattiamd.com/newsletter/

    Connect with Peter on Facebook | Twitter | Instagram.

    Health Effects and risk of vaping: is the SCHEER report accurate?_Dr. Renèe O'Leary

    Health Effects and risk of vaping: is the SCHEER report accurate?_Dr. Renèe O'Leary
    The European Commission and its Scientific Committee on Health, Environmental and Emerging Risks (SCHEER) has recently published a preliminary Opinion on electronic cigarettes.

    The report mainly focused on adverse health effects and the risks associated with e-cigarettes.

    Following the publication, three leading scientists contesting the conclusions of the report.

    We have with us one of the experts of the joint statement, Dr Renee O'Leary, to discuss the SCHEER's report and the future of vaping in Europe.