Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Monetizing unused spaces with AirbnbAirbnb can help earn extra income by renting out unused spaces. The process is easy to start and the potential value of your home is significant. Understanding the banking system and its role in deposits, loans, and investments can also lead to financial growth.

      Making the most of what you already have can be an effective way to earn extra income through side hustles, such as becoming an Airbnb host. This was highlighted in the podcast by Nicole Lappin, who shared her personal experience of using Airbnb to monetize her remote cabins while she writes, addressing her concern about leaving her house empty. She emphasized the ease of getting started with Airbnb and the potential value of your home. On a different note, the podcast also discussed the importance of understanding the banking system and how it functions, emphasizing the role of banks in taking in deposits, loaning out money, and investing it, while maintaining a reasonable cash reserve. These insights provide valuable perspectives on making the most of available resources and gaining a better understanding of the financial systems we rely on.

    • Banks face challenges with inflation and bond salesInflation causes depositors to spend, forcing banks to keep more cash. Bond sales due to rising interest rates could lead to losses, impacting solvency and market trust.

      Inflation is causing depositors to spend more, forcing banks to keep larger cash reserves. Banks often generate additional income through bonds, but when interest rates rise, bond prices decrease, potentially leading to unrealized losses on their balance sheets. If market pressures force banks to sell these bonds prematurely, they could experience losses, leading to a potential lack of trust and confidence. A recent report revealed that over 190 American banks have potential weaknesses in their financials, and while a premature asset sale wouldn't result in a bank run, it could impact their solvency. The situation at Credit Suisse and First Republic, however, has shaken the market's trust, as these banks have a history of scandals and past mistakes. Credit Suisse, once Europe's second-largest bank with $1 trillion under management, has been plagued by secrecy scandals and international tax evasion schemes. As market instability continues, maintaining trust and balance within the financial system becomes increasingly important.

    • Credit Suisse's Instability and the Ripple EffectFinancial instability at Credit Suisse and First Republic led to market concerns and interventions, highlighting the importance of regulatory oversight and market confidence in maintaining financial stability.

      Credit Suisse, a globally important bank with a questionable past, faced renewed scrutiny and instability in 2023 due to financial reporting issues and a withdrawal of support from the Saudi National Bank. This comes after a history of problematic behavior, including spying on employees and associations with unsavory characters. The bank's instability led to a larger financial crisis, prompting UBS to buy Credit Suisse and the Swiss government and central banks to intervene to prevent panic. Meanwhile, First Republic, another bank with liquidity issues, also faced concerns and received support from other banks to calm the markets. The takeaway is that financial instability can have far-reaching consequences and that regulatory oversight and market confidence are crucial in maintaining financial stability.

    • Banking instability and Fed's rate hike decisionThe banking industry's instability, with 40% deposits withdrawn, complicates the Fed's rate hike decision. Credit unions, owned by depositors, prioritize costs over profits, potentially reducing risk.

      The current instability in the banking industry, with about 40% of deposits being withdrawn from some banks, makes the Federal Reserve's decision-making around interest rate hikes even more complex. This instability arises from the fact that banks operate as businesses with shareholders, which can lead to profit-driven behavior that may not always serve depositors' best interests. In contrast, credit unions, which are owned by depositors, prioritize operating costs over profit margins, potentially reducing the risk of such behavior. As the Fed announces its latest rate decision on March 22nd, it's essential to consider this context. For those feeling uneasy about the banking industry, exploring local credit unions could be a viable alternative. As always, if you have money-related questions, don't hesitate to reach out to us at money rehab at money news network.com. And remember, investing in your financial education is the most valuable investment you can make. Thank you for listening.

    Recent Episodes from Money Rehab with Nicole Lapin

    Tips for Acing a Grant Application and Getting People To Care About Financial Literacy with Jailin Griffiths (Global Head of Purpose at Nasdaq) and Three Grant Winners

    Tips for Acing a Grant Application and Getting People To Care About Financial Literacy with Jailin Griffiths (Global Head of Purpose at Nasdaq) and Three Grant Winners
    Today, you’re going to get tips on investing, building generational wealth, teaching kids about financial literacy and applying for grants— and you’re going to hear this advice from three stellar recipients of the Nasdaq Foundation's Quarterly Grant Program. But first, Nicole sits down with Jailan Griffiths, the Global Head of Purpose for Nasdaq, to talk about the work Nasdaq is doing to further financial literacy, and the voice all companies should be listening to when shaping their mission (spoiler alert: it's their employees!). Read more about Nasdaq’s purpose-driven work, including the grant program, here: https://www.nasdaq.com/nasdaq-foundation  Check out the report Jailin mentions around their New Investor Initiative called Transforming Investor Identity, here: https://www.nasdaq.com/new-investor-initiative. Learn more about Judy Herbst & Savvy Ladies here: https://www.savvyladies.org/ Learn more about Sarah Dieleman Perry & Neighborhood Allies here: https://neighborhoodallies.org/  Learn more about Gayle Villani & GO Project here: https://www.goprojectnyc.org/

    Encore: Nicole Negotiates Her Rent!

    Encore: Nicole Negotiates Her Rent!
    Originally aired April 19, 2022. Money Rehabbers want to know: can you negotiate your rent after signing a lease? Be a fly on the wall as Nicole negotiates her rent with her landlord! Can Nicole get a better deal? You’ll have to tune in to find out!

    Former Disney Star Christy Carlson Romano and Brendan Rooney on Losing All the Disney Money, Healing Financial Trauma and Working With Your Spouse

    Former Disney Star Christy Carlson Romano and Brendan Rooney on Losing All the Disney Money, Healing Financial Trauma and Working With Your Spouse
    You might think that Brendan Rooney, who had a "normal" middle-class childhood, enlisted in the Marines, and then went to Columbia University would have very little in common with Christy Carlson Romano, former Disney Channel child star who, in her words, made— and lost— millions of dollars. And yet, the married couple say their childhoods were not that different when it came to the hard financial lessons. Nicole sits down with Christy and Brendan, who run the podcast network Podco, and talk about what it's like being business partners with your romantic partner. Then, Christy talks about her financial journey after rocketing to superstardom so young, and how she made— and lost millions. We talk about when spending can turn into a form of self-harm, and her advice to anyone looking to build a healthier relationship with money. To watch Christy's YouTube video "How I Lost All My Money," click here. Learn more about Brendan and Christy's podcast network here.

    Related Episodes

    Q1 2023 | Putting the Quarter-in-Perspective | Part Two: Interest Rate Hikes & Bank Failures

    Q1 2023 | Putting the Quarter-in-Perspective | Part Two: Interest Rate Hikes & Bank Failures

    Stories of historically atypical interest rate hikes, and multiple bank failures, concerned many advisors in the early days of 2023. Join us for the second (and final) part of our discussion with Casey Dylan, CIMA®, Consultant, and the host of Unfiltered Finance, Tom Romano, Head of Strategic Relationships, as we discuss some of the more prominent news events, and their effects, during Q1 of this year.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss.
    Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions.
     
    Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.

    Transcript:

    0
    00:00:01.900 --> 00:00:07.800
    Let's let's

    1
    00:00:07.600 --> 00:00:10.600
    shift a little bit to some of the headlines that we saw because there was

    2
    00:00:10.600 --> 00:00:15.100
    there's quite a bit. It felt like it was a very long quarter. Yeah, and you

    3
    00:00:14.200 --> 00:00:17.700
    know as we did see some positive results, but can we

    4
    00:00:17.600 --> 00:00:21.300
    talk a little bit about just in general some of the headlines that we saw and

    5
    00:00:20.600 --> 00:00:25.000
    then specifically I want to take a dive into inflation

    6
    00:00:23.600 --> 00:00:26.700
    and then the banks because that was

    7
    00:00:26.700 --> 00:00:30.200
    a really big headline. We got a lot of a lot of calls regarding that look

    8
    00:00:29.800 --> 00:00:31.200
    there there were

    9
    00:00:33.300 --> 00:00:35.900
    Striking headlines around things like

    10
    00:00:36.800 --> 00:00:40.800
    shocks to sort of economic surprises on

    11
    00:00:42.000 --> 00:00:45.300
    job numbers to what was going on with the FED

    12
    00:00:45.100 --> 00:00:48.400
    to Banks not just near the United States but

    13
    00:00:48.100 --> 00:00:51.600
    internationally and yet what you see is kind

    14
    00:00:51.400 --> 00:00:55.000
    of, you know markets do what they do in in any given day. They respond

    15
    00:00:54.600 --> 00:00:57.900
    to that but they are quick to incorporate the news

    16
    00:00:57.600 --> 00:01:01.300
    and get back to pricing on other kinds of things. And

    17
    00:01:00.600 --> 00:01:05.200
    so I would say as a micro dosage of

    18
    00:01:04.600 --> 00:01:08.400
    what the ride is for investors. It's

    19
    00:01:07.800 --> 00:01:11.000
    this it's if you can sort of

    20
    00:01:11.000 --> 00:01:14.400
    take in stride that there are going to be lots of headlines and

    21
    00:01:14.100 --> 00:01:17.500
    that there may be short-term Market reactions headlines over the

    22
    00:01:17.400 --> 00:01:21.000
    longer term that kind of gets filtered out on

    23
    00:01:20.400 --> 00:01:23.700
    the upside and downside right and what you get back

    24
    00:01:23.400 --> 00:01:26.600
    to is. Hey one of my paying for right I'm paying for some kind

    25
    00:01:26.500 --> 00:01:30.100
    of future earnings or I'm lending with some expectation that

    26
    00:01:29.800 --> 00:01:33.800
    I'm going to get paid and income stream based on that and that tends

    27
    00:01:33.000 --> 00:01:36.700
    to drown out the short term noise and now

    28
    00:01:36.400 --> 00:01:40.200
    you're back to factors of how much did I pay did I

    29
    00:01:40.100 --> 00:01:41.700
    get my earnings did I not is

    30
    00:01:42.000 --> 00:01:45.600
    We're upside to that right and markets are kind of a weighing machine

    31
    00:01:45.500 --> 00:01:48.900
    in that sense. Right? They're weighing those earnings. They're weighing those

    32
    00:01:48.900 --> 00:01:52.200
    cash flows in the future. Right? So I would say

    33
    00:01:52.000 --> 00:01:55.900
    lots of lots of news lots of scurrying

    34
    00:01:55.000 --> 00:01:56.300
    around the news.

    35
    00:01:57.100 --> 00:02:01.000
    You know at the end of the day we're sort of where we started one

    36
    00:02:00.100 --> 00:02:03.200
    of the headlines and one of the things that we've been getting a lot

    37
    00:02:03.200 --> 00:02:06.300
    of questions about I'm talking about is is inflation. I know we've spent some time

    38
    00:02:06.200 --> 00:02:09.600
    already today talking about that. We did

    39
    00:02:09.400 --> 00:02:13.500
    see US inflation ease a little bit but there

    40
    00:02:13.100 --> 00:02:16.300
    might be some pressures coming up. So if you don't mind commenting on that, that

    41
    00:02:16.100 --> 00:02:19.200
    would be great. Yeah, you bet. I think it's helpful to kind of

    42
    00:02:19.200 --> 00:02:21.200
    take a step back and look at

    43
    00:02:22.200 --> 00:02:25.700
    With the onset of the pandemic right everything kind

    44
    00:02:25.400 --> 00:02:28.800
    of shut down and then when we went to reopen things back up

    45
    00:02:28.600 --> 00:02:32.000
    factories didn't necessarily open up, especially in

    46
    00:02:31.900 --> 00:02:36.600
    places like China right for some time. Right and the the

    47
    00:02:35.300 --> 00:02:39.700
    supply chain was suddenly

    48
    00:02:38.300 --> 00:02:41.500
    constrained and so we

    49
    00:02:41.300 --> 00:02:44.300
    had a hard time getting Goods, right but there was a lot

    50
    00:02:44.300 --> 00:02:48.400
    of demand because we were at home, you know person stuff and so

    51
    00:02:48.200 --> 00:02:51.700
    as you have demand shoot up but supplies constrained

    52
    00:02:51.200 --> 00:02:54.500
    price shoots up, right? That's just sort of Economics 101

    53
    00:02:54.200 --> 00:02:57.400
    and we saw that and at the time, you know, the Fed was quick

    54
    00:02:57.200 --> 00:03:00.500
    to say, hey, look we think this is transitory think eventually things

    55
    00:03:00.200 --> 00:03:03.700
    settle down we get manufacturing back online. We work

    56
    00:03:03.400 --> 00:03:06.700
    out the bugaboos associated with the supply chain

    57
    00:03:06.500 --> 00:03:09.600
    and those the price pressure doesn't inflationary pressure should come back

    58
    00:03:09.500 --> 00:03:13.100
    down over time and in large respect

    59
    00:03:12.800 --> 00:03:16.500
    this seems to have proven that out right?

    60
    00:03:15.800 --> 00:03:19.100
    I think what really got the fed's

    61
    00:03:18.800 --> 00:03:21.800
    attention and started them down the path.

    62
    00:03:22.200 --> 00:03:26.100
    Of really dramatically raising rates was

    63
    00:03:25.400 --> 00:03:28.700
    the fact that well while goods were

    64
    00:03:28.500 --> 00:03:31.800
    sort of starting to come back down. It was

    65
    00:03:31.600 --> 00:03:34.900
    inflation associated with services that was going up. And

    66
    00:03:34.600 --> 00:03:37.800
    in fact, what we've seen is good coming down

    67
    00:03:37.600 --> 00:03:40.700
    the the overall inflation of

    68
    00:03:40.600 --> 00:03:44.500
    the CPI number or that PC number coming down from its

    69
    00:03:44.100 --> 00:03:48.100
    highs last summer, but while that's been happening underneath

    70
    00:03:48.900 --> 00:03:52.300
    Inflation associated with Services has continued to

    71
    00:03:52.100 --> 00:03:52.600
    go up.

    72
    00:03:53.200 --> 00:03:56.500
    And so even if we're at a point now where the latest inflationary readings

    73
    00:03:56.200 --> 00:03:58.100
    are half of what they were.

    74
    00:03:58.900 --> 00:04:00.400
    Just a year ago this time.

    75
    00:04:01.600 --> 00:04:05.500
    Services inflation is up and continuing to go the wrong direction. Right? And

    76
    00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:08.400
    so the the FED has said hey, look

    77
    00:04:08.200 --> 00:04:11.400
    first of all, we don't look at kind of the overall CPI number. We don't

    78
    00:04:11.300 --> 00:04:15.500
    that's not how we measure it. We're looking at these underlying statuents and

    79
    00:04:14.900 --> 00:04:18.600
    they prefer the the pce as

    80
    00:04:18.200 --> 00:04:21.300
    opposed to CPI, but they're all just kind of ways of measuring, you know

    81
    00:04:21.300 --> 00:04:24.900
    inflation in the economy. And so

    82
    00:04:24.400 --> 00:04:27.400
    one of the ways that we've looked at

    83
    00:04:27.400 --> 00:04:30.600
    this for a very long time is core CPI, right? We're stripping out the

    84
    00:04:30.400 --> 00:04:34.100
    volatility of energy and food because those tend to move around so much and then

    85
    00:04:33.900 --> 00:04:37.300
    you know, we've been introduced to this concept that not

    86
    00:04:37.000 --> 00:04:40.500
    only is it core CPI, but it's core Goods CPI and

    87
    00:04:40.200 --> 00:04:44.100
    course Services CPI. And so the FED now is very focused

    88
    00:04:43.600 --> 00:04:48.000
    on core Services looking at Services minus

    89
    00:04:47.000 --> 00:04:50.400
    services for energy and food and what

    90
    00:04:50.100 --> 00:04:54.000
    we see are again our sort of troubling Trends

    91
    00:04:53.100 --> 00:04:56.500
    around services and housing

    92
    00:04:56.100 --> 00:04:59.400
    in terms of the impact that that

    93
    00:04:59.200 --> 00:05:01.400
    has now pushing.

    94
    00:05:01.600 --> 00:05:04.700
    Up or holding up those inflation numbers and if they

    95
    00:05:04.600 --> 00:05:08.100
    continue on the wrong direction, that's what the fed's concern about and the

    96
    00:05:07.600 --> 00:05:11.500
    the whammy that potentially comes

    97
    00:05:10.600 --> 00:05:13.900
    from if Services costs go

    98
    00:05:13.700 --> 00:05:16.800
    up at some point that starts to impact Goods costs as

    99
    00:05:16.700 --> 00:05:20.600
    well. Right? And so if you look at this where the the white

    100
    00:05:19.800 --> 00:05:23.200
    bars are coming down, right the the concern

    101
    00:05:22.800 --> 00:05:26.400
    is that Services cost the cost of producing goods

    102
    00:05:25.800 --> 00:05:29.200
    and delivering them right is going to impact the the cost

    103
    00:05:29.000 --> 00:05:32.500
    that gets passed through and goods start to come back up and there's sort

    104
    00:05:32.100 --> 00:05:35.500
    of a double double impact of inflation if

    105
    00:05:35.400 --> 00:05:38.700
    you will and that's what I think the FED is incredibly concerned about

    106
    00:05:38.500 --> 00:05:41.600
    and and why they say look we're gonna ratchet rates up

    107
    00:05:41.600 --> 00:05:45.700
    and we're gonna keep them up there long enough until we're convinced that we've we've

    108
    00:05:44.800 --> 00:05:48.000
    stamped this out and brought it back down to a level that's

    109
    00:05:47.800 --> 00:05:51.000
    livable because the last thing you want to do is take your foot off the pedal.

    110
    00:05:51.800 --> 00:05:55.300
    And then suddenly have a Resurgence of these

    111
    00:05:55.000 --> 00:05:58.300
    inflation Air Forces which that we've saw

    112
    00:05:58.000 --> 00:06:01.400
    in the 70s, right if you think about what we've we've

    113
    00:06:01.200 --> 00:06:04.800
    seen this show before the early 70s the FED raising

    114
    00:06:04.500 --> 00:06:08.400
    rates taking their their foot off the brake, I guess and then

    115
    00:06:08.000 --> 00:06:11.900
    Resurgence of inflation in the late 70s stagflationary

    116
    00:06:11.200 --> 00:06:14.500
    environment and it took the volcker FED in the 80s

    117
    00:06:14.200 --> 00:06:17.800
    taken rates to places. We'd never seen until recently right to

    118
    00:06:17.400 --> 00:06:20.700
    to stamp that out. And so I think the FED

    119
    00:06:20.500 --> 00:06:24.000
    is taking a lesson from history and said we don't want to repeat those mistakes.

    120
    00:06:23.600 --> 00:06:27.000
    We're gonna stay on this until we're sure right absolutely and

    121
    00:06:26.600 --> 00:06:30.200
    speaking of the fed and it says been a very fast pace

    122
    00:06:29.600 --> 00:06:32.800
    in terms of Ray hikes. Yeah

    123
    00:06:32.600 --> 00:06:36.200
    historically exactly exactly so

    124
    00:06:35.800 --> 00:06:40.400
    they they have meant business and I

    125
    00:06:39.500 --> 00:06:44.100
    think Market participants repeatedly made

    126
    00:06:43.200 --> 00:06:47.000
    the mistake of not taking

    127
    00:06:46.700 --> 00:06:48.200
    the FED at its word.

    128
    00:06:48.700 --> 00:06:51.900
    Right and and equities markets have

    129
    00:06:51.700 --> 00:06:54.900
    definitely gotten well ahead of the FED particularly at

    130
    00:06:54.700 --> 00:06:58.600
    the end of last year and maybe potentially the beginning of this year bond markets

    131
    00:06:58.200 --> 00:07:01.500
    now are pricing that the FED

    132
    00:07:01.200 --> 00:07:05.000
    will pull back and yet the FED is saying no. No, we're we're

    133
    00:07:04.600 --> 00:07:08.600
    gonna raise rates and we're gonna keep them there longer and that's

    134
    00:07:07.600 --> 00:07:10.900
    you know, we have no expectation that we would

    135
    00:07:10.800 --> 00:07:14.300
    pull back from that anytime this year. Right? So the market

    136
    00:07:13.800 --> 00:07:17.000
    participants are our forward looking forward pricing, but

    137
    00:07:16.900 --> 00:07:20.500
    they seem to not be taking the FED at its word. I think that's pulled

    138
    00:07:20.100 --> 00:07:23.800
    back a little bit in February and March we started to

    139
    00:07:23.500 --> 00:07:25.400
    see Market participants kind of get their arms around.

    140
    00:07:26.300 --> 00:07:29.400
    Actually be coming and we see you know

    141
    00:07:29.400 --> 00:07:33.400
    investors like hedge funds really sort of looking at volatility

    142
    00:07:32.400 --> 00:07:36.000
    Bets with the expectation that hey this

    143
    00:07:35.600 --> 00:07:39.300
    may get a little more turbulent before it gets better. Right? So

    144
    00:07:39.000 --> 00:07:44.200
    there's a lot of sort of now Market positioning

    145
    00:07:43.200 --> 00:07:46.500
    for the fed me

    146
    00:07:46.300 --> 00:07:49.800
    actually do this and we may see an economic pullback,

    147
    00:07:49.300 --> 00:07:52.800
    but that may not necessarily mean the FED response to

    148
    00:07:52.800 --> 00:07:56.500
    it. Right? I think again as we look forward the

    149
    00:07:55.900 --> 00:08:00.100
    the way that I would think about this as an investor as a the

    150
    00:07:59.200 --> 00:08:03.000
    stock market is not the economy, right? The

    151
    00:08:02.400 --> 00:08:06.200
    markets are definitely driven by

    152
    00:08:05.700 --> 00:08:09.400
    interest rates and fed movement

    153
    00:08:09.000 --> 00:08:10.200
    and yet

    154
    00:08:12.500 --> 00:08:16.400
    Much like headlines the markets take that

    155
    00:08:16.200 --> 00:08:20.200
    news and stride it gets built into prices and there

    156
    00:08:19.800 --> 00:08:23.000
    may be short-term volatility associated with this but if you look out over

    157
    00:08:22.800 --> 00:08:26.300
    time, you know, what what do we see going back to

    158
    00:08:26.000 --> 00:08:29.200
    you know, as long as we have records 1926 and Beyond

    159
    00:08:29.000 --> 00:08:32.600
    right Imperial heads when interest rates

    160
    00:08:32.300 --> 00:08:36.300
    go up interest rates go down inflationary environments disinflationary environments

    161
    00:08:35.900 --> 00:08:40.100
    recessionary environments across all of those things markets

    162
    00:08:38.900 --> 00:08:42.400
    tend to produce a return

    163
    00:08:42.100 --> 00:08:45.700
    of you know, seven to ten percent average annual

    164
    00:08:45.400 --> 00:08:49.000
    you don't get that every year but you get on average over time and it's

    165
    00:08:48.700 --> 00:08:52.200
    paying you for those cash flows so much like,

    166
    00:08:51.900 --> 00:08:55.100
    you know, the all the comments that we've had prior to

    167
    00:08:54.900 --> 00:08:55.200
    this.

    168
    00:08:56.500 --> 00:08:59.900
    As investors, it's important to sort of take in its Stride

    169
    00:08:59.800 --> 00:09:02.900
    Right put some blinders on there may be volatility associated with

    170
    00:09:02.800 --> 00:09:06.400
    this ride. You will get wet on this ride. Right but we

    171
    00:09:05.800 --> 00:09:08.900
    promise you'll come out in the other side, right and when you do,

    172
    00:09:08.800 --> 00:09:11.900
    you know, the markets will get back to doing what they

    173
    00:09:11.800 --> 00:09:15.000
    do, which is you know, paying you for putting Capital to work

    174
    00:09:15.000 --> 00:09:18.400
    in there. So so that I would say again we watch these

    175
    00:09:18.100 --> 00:09:21.300
    things. We we sort of especially working

    176
    00:09:21.100 --> 00:09:24.200
    in the industry. It's a incumbent upon

    177
    00:09:24.100 --> 00:09:27.200
    us to have some product prognostication about where this could

    178
    00:09:27.100 --> 00:09:30.800
    be headed at the end of the day what we think matters very little it's

    179
    00:09:30.100 --> 00:09:33.300
    what actually happens and we build portfolios to

    180
    00:09:33.100 --> 00:09:36.600
    be as robust as we can because Anything Could Happen. Yeah, that's that's fantastic.

    181
    00:09:36.100 --> 00:09:39.300
    And that's a really good way of putting it. We don't know what's

    182
    00:09:39.100 --> 00:09:40.000
    happening, but we're

    183
    00:09:41.000 --> 00:09:45.000
    We're invested in a way to endure what's to come? Right? Exactly. So

    184
    00:09:44.100 --> 00:09:47.500
    one of the headlines that we we spent

    185
    00:09:47.300 --> 00:09:50.700
    a lot of time talking to advisors and investors alike is the

    186
    00:09:50.600 --> 00:09:54.200
    the notion of the banks and we saw from Silicon Valley

    187
    00:09:54.000 --> 00:09:56.100
    and First Republic and a few others.

    188
    00:09:57.000 --> 00:10:00.200
    I think it's a it's a risk reward story. But I also think

    189
    00:10:00.000 --> 00:10:04.400
    this is the diversification story there. I'd love to hear your thoughts. Yeah. Well, yes,

    190
    00:10:03.700 --> 00:10:05.500
    I think

    191
    00:10:06.600 --> 00:10:08.300
    the the situation with the banks

    192
    00:10:09.300 --> 00:10:13.300
    has a lot to do with other stuff, right? Yes, the

    193
    00:10:12.600 --> 00:10:15.800
    the banks were quick to come out and say well this

    194
    00:10:15.600 --> 00:10:18.800
    is a consequence of how rapidly the FED is

    195
    00:10:18.600 --> 00:10:22.300
    raised interest rates. And this is potentially impaired the

    196
    00:10:22.200 --> 00:10:25.300
    asset base of these Banks and there's no question right over the

    197
    00:10:25.200 --> 00:10:28.600
    course of 2022. You saw the asset base

    198
    00:10:28.200 --> 00:10:31.500
    drop significantly across banks in

    199
    00:10:31.400 --> 00:10:34.800
    general because right so, you know first principles,

    200
    00:10:34.400 --> 00:10:37.500
    what is a bank do they take money in when they

    201
    00:10:37.500 --> 00:10:41.100
    take that money in as a deposit? It's a liability to them. Right?

    202
    00:10:40.500 --> 00:10:43.600
    So they take that liability and they got to go match it up

    203
    00:10:43.500 --> 00:10:47.000
    with an asset and they do that either by making loans and if

    204
    00:10:46.900 --> 00:10:50.800
    they can't make enough loans, then they got to go buy bonds treasuries.

    205
    00:10:50.300 --> 00:10:53.800
    For instance, right? Yes. That's the old against the

    206
    00:10:53.300 --> 00:10:56.600
    liabilities. So if you if you've got a bank that

    207
    00:10:56.300 --> 00:10:59.600
    has a bunch of bonds that they're holding as an asset

    208
    00:10:59.300 --> 00:11:03.000
    and the value of those bonds dramatically drop. They've lost

    209
    00:11:02.600 --> 00:11:06.000
    a lot of money against the liabilities that

    210
    00:11:05.900 --> 00:11:08.800
    are still where they are, right and

    211
    00:11:09.200 --> 00:11:13.400
    So that's that's the the challenge for

    212
    00:11:12.900 --> 00:11:13.900
    the financial.

    213
    00:11:15.800 --> 00:11:19.200
    sector and it no surprise the financial sector

    214
    00:11:18.900 --> 00:11:22.600
    was sort of the worst performing sector for the first quarter in large

    215
    00:11:22.400 --> 00:11:23.700
    part because of these Dynamics

    216
    00:11:24.800 --> 00:11:28.300
    It was a part of what happened at svb. It was a catalyst

    217
    00:11:27.800 --> 00:11:31.300
    for the bank run that followed but the bank

    218
    00:11:31.000 --> 00:11:34.500
    run followed because of the unique dynamics of

    219
    00:11:34.400 --> 00:11:38.100
    svb, correct? Right and the the failure

    220
    00:11:37.500 --> 00:11:40.900
    of silvergate was

    221
    00:11:40.500 --> 00:11:44.200
    function of crypto and had as

    222
    00:11:43.800 --> 00:11:47.500
    much to do with FTX the failure of FTX, which

    223
    00:11:47.200 --> 00:11:50.300
    was a Ponzi scheme, right? So you have

    224
    00:11:50.200 --> 00:11:54.300
    a lot of kind of very unique situations Signature Bank,

    225
    00:11:54.100 --> 00:11:58.000
    very crypto focused right First Republic the

    226
    00:11:57.100 --> 00:12:00.900
    very very heavily on

    227
    00:12:00.200 --> 00:12:04.200
    the asset side writing interest only mortgages

    228
    00:12:03.400 --> 00:12:06.700
    right in to a degree that other

    229
    00:12:06.500 --> 00:12:10.500
    Banks didn't have some unique characteristics of these Banks which cause

    230
    00:12:09.900 --> 00:12:13.600
    them to be sort of the canary in the coal mine if you will right

    231
    00:12:12.900 --> 00:12:16.100
    and Credit Suisse just

    232
    00:12:18.000 --> 00:12:21.100
    Has struggled for years, right? And this was

    233
    00:12:21.000 --> 00:12:24.500
    just the nail in the coffin form. The concern is are they

    234
    00:12:24.200 --> 00:12:27.600
    the canary in the coal mine or are they just being punished because

    235
    00:12:27.400 --> 00:12:29.900
    the malfeasance and poor management?

    236
    00:12:31.000 --> 00:12:34.700
    And I think the answer is a bit of both, right? So the the

    237
    00:12:34.400 --> 00:12:38.400
    fed and other institutions got

    238
    00:12:38.000 --> 00:12:41.900
    together and said, hey, we got a backstop this thing to keep any contagion

    239
    00:12:41.300 --> 00:12:45.300
    from spreading and assure depositors that

    240
    00:12:45.200 --> 00:12:48.600
    they're deposits are safe, even if the value of the bond the assets

    241
    00:12:48.200 --> 00:12:51.600
    that these banks are holding have dropped down. We the the government

    242
    00:12:51.200 --> 00:12:54.300
    are going to step in and and backstop not just

    243
    00:12:54.200 --> 00:12:57.300
    your 250,000 but everything right that was

    244
    00:12:57.300 --> 00:13:00.500
    the strong message that they sent and that sort of seem to

    245
    00:13:00.300 --> 00:13:03.600
    work, right it calm markets. Thanks for still being sort of reviewed and

    246
    00:13:03.500 --> 00:13:06.500
    I would say look there's there could be more to this story. There could be

    247
    00:13:06.500 --> 00:13:09.800
    other shoes to drop in time. Right? So you'll continue

    248
    00:13:09.500 --> 00:13:12.600
    to watch it. I think as in as a person

    249
    00:13:12.500 --> 00:13:15.600
    who has money at a bank, right am I rushing to pull my money

    250
    00:13:15.500 --> 00:13:18.800
    out? No, I'm fairly confident that you know,

    251
    00:13:18.800 --> 00:13:21.500
    we're we're gonna survive this right now.

    252
    00:13:22.400 --> 00:13:26.100
    Did I say the same thing in 2008 when when I

    253
    00:13:25.700 --> 00:13:28.900
    really thought hey, man, the whole financial system could go down.

    254
    00:13:28.800 --> 00:13:32.300
    These Banks had collapse in Mass. I don't think we're anywhere

    255
    00:13:31.900 --> 00:13:35.300
    near that I think banks are much healthier than than they

    256
    00:13:35.100 --> 00:13:39.900
    were then and I think the issues that they have have to do with treasuries and

    257
    00:13:39.800 --> 00:13:43.200
    the FED has said look, we're gonna step in and provide as much liquidity

    258
    00:13:42.800 --> 00:13:46.400
    as necessary for the banks. So this becomes

    259
    00:13:45.900 --> 00:13:49.700
    a potential issue down the down the pike, right? If

    260
    00:13:49.200 --> 00:13:52.700
    in fact the FED has to step in and provide the

    261
    00:13:52.300 --> 00:13:55.700
    Surplus liquidity to the treasury market,

    262
    00:13:55.500 --> 00:13:56.800
    why might they have to do that?

    263
    00:13:57.800 --> 00:14:01.000
    Well, if for some reason we default on the debt ceiling for instance,

    264
    00:14:00.800 --> 00:14:04.200
    right that could be very problematic and the FED

    265
    00:14:04.000 --> 00:14:07.200
    might have to take aggressive steps in a way that we've

    266
    00:14:07.100 --> 00:14:11.300
    never seen before to step in and try and provide Surplus liquidity

    267
    00:14:10.700 --> 00:14:14.000
    specifically to the treasury market. That would

    268
    00:14:13.800 --> 00:14:17.300
    be a complete roll reversal of where we've been right? That's that's

    269
    00:14:17.000 --> 00:14:20.900
    taking the quantitative tightening off the table and now we're back to quantities, right

    270
    00:14:20.400 --> 00:14:23.600
    so so could things come down the bike that

    271
    00:14:23.500 --> 00:14:26.900
    would cause a, you know, real dislocation to

    272
    00:14:26.500 --> 00:14:29.900
    banking to markets sure it could happen

    273
    00:14:29.700 --> 00:14:32.900
    again. Who knows right? Everybody's got a crystal

    274
    00:14:32.800 --> 00:14:33.100
    ball.

    275
    00:14:34.100 --> 00:14:37.700
    Nobody's usually right spot on about what's gonna happen, but

    276
    00:14:37.200 --> 00:14:40.400
    it's a potential risk that you want. Hey, look this might happen, but

    277
    00:14:40.300 --> 00:14:41.000
    we'll survive.

    278
    00:14:41.600 --> 00:14:45.200
    Yeah, no, absolutely. And as you said before, I mean, it seems like the markets

    279
    00:14:44.600 --> 00:14:45.300
    have.

    280
    00:14:46.100 --> 00:14:49.600
    sort of shrugged off those headlines because we've seen some pretty decent returns

    281
    00:14:49.100 --> 00:14:52.000
    and in q1, but I think you know in

    282
    00:14:53.200 --> 00:14:56.500
    Let's let's go back to the text docs, right? I mean that's what's really

    283
    00:14:56.300 --> 00:14:57.800
    leading the charge here, isn't it?

    284
    00:14:58.800 --> 00:14:59.000
    well

    285
    00:15:00.000 --> 00:15:01.800
    I think there are a lot of Dynamics at play.

    286
    00:15:02.400 --> 00:15:06.000
    But underpinning all of that is risk and reward right?

    287
    00:15:05.500 --> 00:15:08.800
    I mean that at the end of the day, it's that simple

    288
    00:15:08.600 --> 00:15:11.700
    what are the risks and what are the rewards and how much am I

    289
    00:15:11.600 --> 00:15:15.400
    willing to pay for those rewards? And am I underestimating those

    290
    00:15:15.200 --> 00:15:18.800
    risks? Right? So everything is sort of a function of those things

    291
    00:15:18.600 --> 00:15:22.000
    and so I would say look in equities. The the

    292
    00:15:21.600 --> 00:15:25.200
    tech stocks is a risk, right? There's there's certainly reward

    293
    00:15:25.000 --> 00:15:28.400
    there's upside there. We're seeing it in terms of markets, but I think there's risk

    294
    00:15:28.100 --> 00:15:31.800
    right in fixed income. There's potential

    295
    00:15:31.200 --> 00:15:34.600
    risk associated with the yield curve

    296
    00:15:34.400 --> 00:15:39.000
    and what happens with the fed and raising rates in areas,

    297
    00:15:38.100 --> 00:15:41.600
    like financials. There's risks

    298
    00:15:41.200 --> 00:15:44.800
    right associated with that. I think the key

    299
    00:15:44.500 --> 00:15:47.800
    takeaway for that for anybody looking at

    300
    00:15:47.600 --> 00:15:48.300
    it is

    301
    00:15:49.200 --> 00:15:52.500
    Broad diversification not just in

    302
    00:15:52.200 --> 00:15:55.600
    one geography not just inequities not just in fixed income

    303
    00:15:55.300 --> 00:15:58.300
    across factors as much as you

    304
    00:15:58.300 --> 00:16:01.800
    can broadly diversify the more robust your portfolio is to

    305
    00:16:01.300 --> 00:16:04.200
    stand up to any of those unique risks.

    306
    00:16:04.900 --> 00:16:06.800
    And so I would I would say.

    307
    00:16:08.200 --> 00:16:12.100
    That that would be where I would encourage investors to

    308
    00:16:11.700 --> 00:16:13.100
    sort of keep their heads.

    309
    00:16:14.100 --> 00:16:17.400
    I it's always challenging when you have tech stocks doing

    310
    00:16:17.300 --> 00:16:20.800
    as well as they are because they drive

    311
    00:16:20.400 --> 00:16:23.700
    markets you want to be there. You want to participate in it.

    312
    00:16:23.500 --> 00:16:27.400
    There's a a benefit socially to

    313
    00:16:26.700 --> 00:16:30.100
    holding names that people are familiar

    314
    00:16:29.700 --> 00:16:33.000
    with and talk about right if you think about the

    315
    00:16:32.700 --> 00:16:36.000
    fomo experience that people have

    316
    00:16:35.700 --> 00:16:38.900
    missing if you're missing out, right? Yeah, my next

    317
    00:16:38.900 --> 00:16:41.900
    door neighbor. He's he's got Google and apple and they're tear on

    318
    00:16:41.900 --> 00:16:45.800
    the cover off the ball. Never mind. What happened last year right now, I gotta you

    319
    00:16:45.100 --> 00:16:48.500
    know, keep up with the Joneses on that water cooler. Alpha

    320
    00:16:48.100 --> 00:16:51.600
    is what I call that. Yeah water cooler Alpha and I would just

    321
    00:16:51.300 --> 00:16:54.900
    say hey look at the end of the day. We're people right if we

    322
    00:16:54.600 --> 00:16:57.800
    were autonomous, you know Vulcans. This would just be

    323
    00:16:57.700 --> 00:17:01.000
    economics and math and we can figure it all out reality is

    324
    00:17:00.900 --> 00:17:04.700
    we're people and you got to build a portfolio you can live with right as

    325
    00:17:04.200 --> 00:17:07.300
    our as our good friend Phil Henry says, you

    326
    00:17:07.200 --> 00:17:10.700
    got to build a portfolio you can live with and then live with it, right? I think

    327
    00:17:10.700 --> 00:17:13.400
    that's absolutely true. And so you have to take into account.

    328
    00:17:14.000 --> 00:17:17.700
    The the investor psychology associated with this that's

    329
    00:17:17.000 --> 00:17:20.200
    why I think momentum is such a

    330
    00:17:20.000 --> 00:17:23.500
    powerful factor to build into your portfolios

    331
    00:17:23.000 --> 00:17:26.200
    because momentum picks up

    332
    00:17:26.000 --> 00:17:29.400
    these like when tech stocks going to run you end up

    333
    00:17:29.400 --> 00:17:33.400
    owning things like Apple and Google and because they

    334
    00:17:32.900 --> 00:17:37.100
    are demonstrating positive momentum, right? So you you're picking

    335
    00:17:36.400 --> 00:17:39.800
    up some of that you're participating in that upside and I

    336
    00:17:39.800 --> 00:17:42.900
    think as a as an investor, that's that would probably be enough for

    337
    00:17:42.800 --> 00:17:46.400
    me, right? It's a modicum of the things that I everybody else

    338
    00:17:46.200 --> 00:17:49.400
    is holding that that's working but it's also stuff that's not working

    339
    00:17:49.300 --> 00:17:52.400
    because eventually that circles around and that becomes the thing

    340
    00:17:52.300 --> 00:17:55.600
    that's worth. I don't have to try and time it. I'm just holding it and I'm

    341
    00:17:55.400 --> 00:17:58.600
    waiting keeping my powder dry in that area so that when it

    342
    00:17:58.400 --> 00:18:02.100
    does I benefit that that's how I would think about it look again

    343
    00:18:01.700 --> 00:18:03.100
    tech stocks are

    344
    00:18:04.300 --> 00:18:08.300
    The amazing thing about markets is they run longer than you think they should right. They're

    345
    00:18:07.900 --> 00:18:12.100
    fueled by stuff. Sometimes you don't understand and and

    346
    00:18:11.600 --> 00:18:15.100
    in many cases, I think the

    347
    00:18:14.700 --> 00:18:18.500
    tech stock Dynamic is is part

    348
    00:18:17.800 --> 00:18:21.300
    fairy dust, right and you know,

    349
    00:18:21.200 --> 00:18:24.500
    we watched it run for a decade and drive markets, you know

    350
    00:18:24.500 --> 00:18:28.800
    for you know, double digit returns for years because

    351
    00:18:27.800 --> 00:18:31.900
    that happen again, of course, it could right. I'm not

    352
    00:18:31.900 --> 00:18:35.700
    gonna tell you again. I am cautious about the

    353
    00:18:35.200 --> 00:18:38.600
    dynamic being set up looking very similar to

    354
    00:18:38.500 --> 00:18:42.200
    the dynamic that we saw at you know, 2019 2020.

    355
    00:18:41.700 --> 00:18:45.000
    Yeah. No, absolutely and you know that seems like that tech

    356
    00:18:44.700 --> 00:18:47.900
    store keeps popping up. I started my career in the late 90s and that was the

    357
    00:18:47.800 --> 00:18:50.600
    whole story and then I saw a lot of portfolios.

    358
    00:18:51.300 --> 00:18:55.100
    A lot of people see their portfolios blow up but because of overexposure to

    359
    00:18:55.000 --> 00:18:58.500
    to technology and they having a

    360
    00:18:58.400 --> 00:19:02.400
    balanced portfolio Diversified across multiple asset classes regions geographies.

    361
    00:19:01.900 --> 00:19:05.000
    That's that's the best course of action at the

    362
    00:19:04.900 --> 00:19:10.100
    end of the day. So yeah, I think I go back to the the E-Trade

    363
    00:19:09.300 --> 00:19:12.600
    baby, right if you remember the E-Trade baby so easy

    364
    00:19:12.500 --> 00:19:15.800
    baby. Yeah that was born right on the text actually and then

    365
    00:19:15.600 --> 00:19:18.700
    they they put the baby away for a while baby's back right now. I was

    366
    00:19:18.600 --> 00:19:21.800
    a little bit older now, he's out of the wedding, you know hanging out

    367
    00:19:21.700 --> 00:19:25.200
    with this guys and gals but to

    368
    00:19:24.800 --> 00:19:28.200
    me that a Hallmark of a caution, right because

    369
    00:19:27.900 --> 00:19:32.000
    the reality is it's it's easy but

    370
    00:19:31.600 --> 00:19:34.900
    hard right it's not you know, it's not

    371
    00:19:34.700 --> 00:19:38.500
    difficult to say. Hey look broadly based diversification sit still it's

    372
    00:19:37.700 --> 00:19:41.000
    incredibly difficult to do. Yeah, right and that's where

    373
    00:19:40.900 --> 00:19:45.100
    the real benefit of working with financial professionals comes in because everybody

    374
    00:19:44.300 --> 00:19:47.900
    thinks they can do it everybody. They're gonna be Spock

    375
    00:19:47.300 --> 00:19:50.600
    and devoid of emotion, but then the moment of truth comes

    376
    00:19:51.200 --> 00:19:54.200
    The market drops 40% and you're looking at like am I gonna

    377
    00:19:54.200 --> 00:19:57.400
    be able to retire? Right and the fear grips hold and it's

    378
    00:19:57.200 --> 00:20:00.900
    2 am and you're thinking what do I do? Right. That's

    379
    00:20:00.300 --> 00:20:03.400
    when you need to have that dispassionate third party

    380
    00:20:03.300 --> 00:20:07.700
    to pick up the phone and say I want to sell everything. They whoa. Let's

    381
    00:20:07.100 --> 00:20:11.000
    revisit right like is anything changed? Oh the

    382
    00:20:10.400 --> 00:20:13.700
    market drop 40% right has anything in your life changed right?

    383
    00:20:13.400 --> 00:20:16.800
    Maybe that's not the best course of action. Let's take a beat having that

    384
    00:20:16.600 --> 00:20:20.000
    dispassionate a third party to keep you from blowing yourself up

    385
    00:20:19.700 --> 00:20:23.000
    at that exact moment is invaluable. Yeah

    386
    00:20:22.700 --> 00:20:26.400
    and making sure you have the right mix between stocks bonds

    387
    00:20:26.000 --> 00:20:29.900
    and maybe even Alternatives depending on the investor and if someone

    388
    00:20:29.500 --> 00:20:33.000
    can't sleep at night, it's not necessarily that they should take action,

    389
    00:20:32.600 --> 00:20:35.800
    but they might be in the wrong asset allocation for

    390
    00:20:35.600 --> 00:20:36.200
    their

    391
    00:20:37.300 --> 00:20:41.000
    The risk, you know their ability to accept right? Yeah,

    392
    00:20:40.600 --> 00:20:45.800
    it could be that often. What I've

    393
    00:20:45.500 --> 00:20:48.800
    experienced is when it's that it's because the client wanted

    394
    00:20:48.500 --> 00:20:52.000
    more Tech right in their portfolios or more of what's

    395
    00:20:51.700 --> 00:20:55.100
    working, right? And then when that's no longer working, they

    396
    00:20:54.700 --> 00:20:57.700
    can't sleep at night, but cautionary Tale the other

    397
    00:20:57.700 --> 00:21:01.900
    piece of that is we're surrounded by the news 24/7

    398
    00:21:01.000 --> 00:21:04.600
    right? It's just and it's always the whatever

    399
    00:21:04.100 --> 00:21:07.700
    bleeds leads right? And so it's this constant

    400
    00:21:07.100 --> 00:21:12.200
    drum beat of kind of negative stuff. And I think that investors

    401
    00:21:10.400 --> 00:21:13.700
    need a voice.

    402
    00:21:14.600 --> 00:21:18.000
    That that they trust to say. Hey, yeah. No I

    403
    00:21:17.800 --> 00:21:21.600
    saw that too. Yes, that bank went out of business. Here's

    404
    00:21:20.800 --> 00:21:24.600
    why we shouldn't Panic here, right? Yep. We

    405
    00:21:24.500 --> 00:21:28.300
    see all that. Here's why we're gonna stay the course. Here's why we're not gonna Panic. Here's

    406
    00:21:27.800 --> 00:21:31.200
    what let's you know, our long-term goals are and we're in good

    407
    00:21:31.100 --> 00:21:35.000
    shape to hit those. I think that sort of calming reassurance

    408
    00:21:34.500 --> 00:21:37.700
    helps people get back to sleeping at night. Yeah. No,

    409
    00:21:37.500 --> 00:21:40.800
    I agree Casey as always. It's a pleasure talking to you.

    410
    00:21:40.700 --> 00:21:43.800
    Thanks for joining us great having you here and I want to thank all of

    411
    00:21:43.700 --> 00:21:47.400
    our listeners and these feel free to access other podcasts

    412
    00:21:46.800 --> 00:21:49.800
    that we have done and they can be

    413
    00:21:49.800 --> 00:21:53.300
    accessed anywhere you get your podcast. So thanks everyone and we

    414
    00:21:53.000 --> 00:21:56.800
    will see you next time symmetry Partners LLC.

    415
    00:21:56.100 --> 00:21:59.600
    It's an investment advisor firm register with

    416
    00:21:59.400 --> 00:22:03.300
    the Security and Exchange Commission The Firm only transacts

    417
    00:22:02.400 --> 00:22:06.200
    business in states where it is properly registered or

    418
    00:22:05.900 --> 00:22:09.800
    excluded or Exempted from registration requirements

    419
    00:22:09.000 --> 00:22:12.900
    registration of an investment advisor does

    420
    00:22:12.600 --> 00:22:14.000
    not imply any specific.

    421
    00:22:14.600 --> 00:22:18.100
    Of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement

    422
    00:22:17.700 --> 00:22:21.000
    of the firm by the commission. No one should assume

    423
    00:22:20.800 --> 00:22:24.800
    that future performance of any specific investment investment strategy

    424
    00:22:24.200 --> 00:22:28.100
    product or non-investment related content

    425
    00:22:27.600 --> 00:22:30.800
    made reference to directly or indirectly in this

    426
    00:22:30.600 --> 00:22:32.600
    material will be profitable.

    427
    00:22:33.500 --> 00:22:37.400
    As with any investment strategy there is the possibility of profitability

    428
    00:22:36.600 --> 00:22:39.800
    as well as loss due to

    429
    00:22:39.700 --> 00:22:43.800
    various factors including changing market conditions and/or

    430
    00:22:42.900 --> 00:22:44.800
    applicable laws.

    431
    00:22:45.500 --> 00:22:49.000
    Content may not be reflective of current opinions or

    432
    00:22:48.700 --> 00:22:52.200
    positions. Please note the material is

    433
    00:22:51.700 --> 00:22:55.300
    provided for educational and background use only moreover. You

    434
    00:22:55.000 --> 00:22:58.900
    should not assume that any discussion or information contained

    435
    00:22:58.200 --> 00:23:01.400
    in this material Services the receipt of

    436
    00:23:01.200 --> 00:23:05.200
    or as a substitute for personalized investment

    437
    00:23:04.600 --> 00:23:05.800
    advice.

    Big Banks, Big Opportunities, and What Did The Fed Chief Say?

    Big Banks, Big Opportunities, and What Did The Fed Chief Say?
    Earnings season kicks off with the latest results from JPMorgan Chase, Wells Fargo, and Citigroup. Take-Two Interactive buys Zynga for $12.7 billion. Elastic's CEO moves to the CTO role. Virgin Galactic needs more money. Meta Platforms shuts down its dating service. Domino's makes changes to deal with inflation. Crocs makes a play for the luxury market. Maria Gallagher and Jason Moser analyze those stories, discuss why they're most curious about upcoming results from Pinterest and Etsy, and share two stocks on their radar: Adyen and Nvidia. CFP Malcolm Ethridge analyzes what Federal Reserve Chair Jay Powell said on Capitol Hill this week and why it matters to investors. Plus, he offers a preview of the 2nd season of "The Tech Money Podcast" and shares why he's keeping an eye on real estate, health care, PayPal, and UnitedHealth Group. Looking to get started investing? We’d love to help with a FREE copy of our Investing Starter Kit. Just click over to www.fool.com/StarterKit and we’ll email it to you. Stocks: WFC, C, JPM, TTWO, ZNGA, ESTC, PINS, AMZN, ETSY, SPCE, MTCH, META, DPZ, CROX, PYPL, UNH, NVDA, ADYEY Host: Chris Hill Guests: Maria Gallagher, Jason Moser, Malcolm Ethridge Engineer: Dan Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    Q1 2023 | Putting the Quarter-in-Perspective | Part One: Market Performance

    Q1 2023 | Putting the Quarter-in-Perspective | Part One: Market Performance

    The sudden failure of Silicon Valley Bank in March jostled investors' confidence in the market. But, the overall performance of various tech stocks in Q1, such as Tesla, Meta, Alphabet, Amazon, Salesforce, AMD, and Broadcom, served to revive optimism for the stock market's near future. Join Casey Dylan, CIMA®, Consultant, and our host Tom Romano, Head of Strategic Relationships and Product Development, in this first half of of our Q1 recap, as we discuss both market, and factor performance, in the first few months of 2023.

    If you have any questions or would like more information, reach out to us at https://symmetrypartners.com/contact-us/

    You can also find us on Facebook, YouTube, Twitter, and LinkedIn. As always, we remain invested in your goals.

    Symmetry Partners, LLC, is an investment advisory firm registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission. The firm only transacts business in states where it is properly registered, excluded or exempted from registration requirements. Registration of an investment adviser does not imply any specific level of skill or training and does not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the Commission. No one should assume that future performance of any specific investment, investment strategy, product or non-investment related content made reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be profitable. As with any investment strategy, there is the possibility of profitability as well as loss.
    Due to various factors, including changing market conditions and/or applicable laws, the content may not be reflective of current opinions or positions.
     
    Please note the material is provided for educational and background use only. Moreover, you should not assume that any discussion or information contained in this material serves as the receipt of, or as a substitute for, personalized investment advice.

     

    Transcript:

    0
    00:00:01.900 --> 00:00:07.400
    Good afternoon,

    1
    00:00:07.400 --> 00:00:10.700
     everyone. This is Tom Romano head of strategic relationships at

    2
    00:00:10.700 --> 00:00:14.200
     symmetry partners and joined with me. Today is Casey Dillon

    3
    00:00:13.200 --> 00:00:16.900
     a long time friend of symmetry and our

    4
    00:00:16.900 --> 00:00:19.500
     internal communication strategist. Thank you Casey for

    5
    00:00:19.500 --> 00:00:22.400
     joining us today. Tom is excellent to be here with you live in

    6
    00:00:22.400 --> 00:00:25.100
     person. Yeah, fantastic. Fantastic So today, we're gonna go

    7
    00:00:25.100 --> 00:00:28.900
     through our q1 2023 quarter in

    8
    00:00:28.900 --> 00:00:31.700
     perspective. It's been quite the

    9
    00:00:31.700 --> 00:00:34.800
     interesting quarter to say the least we've had

    10
    00:00:34.800 --> 00:00:37.800
     some volatile markets. Although

    11
    00:00:37.800 --> 00:00:40.400
     I'll be at some positive results. We've seen things

    12
    00:00:40.400 --> 00:00:43.300
     like banking collapses in the headlines. There's still of

    13
    00:00:43.300 --> 00:00:46.600
     course the concerns about inflation. And so

    14
    00:00:46.600 --> 00:00:49.800
     Casey thank you for joining us to give us some perspective

    15
    00:00:49.800 --> 00:00:52.300
     of what's going on in the market. So in a

    16
    00:00:52.300 --> 00:00:55.800
     nutshell what happened in q1 of 2023, yeah

    17
    00:00:55.800 --> 00:00:58.300
     in a nutshell, I'll be brief if I

    18
    00:00:58.300 --> 00:01:00.500
     can so if you recall

    19
    00:01:01.800 --> 00:01:04.300
    The fourth quarter of last year, right? The

    20
    00:01:04.300 --> 00:01:07.600
     last year was a brutal year across a number of metrics, but

    21
    00:01:07.600 --> 00:01:10.500
     the fourth quarter we started to see some respite

    22
    00:01:10.500 --> 00:01:13.300
     from that and the first two months of the fourth quarter,

    23
    00:01:13.300 --> 00:01:16.600
     right? We saw markets actually rebound pretty

    24
    00:01:16.600 --> 00:01:19.500
     significantly in October and November and much of

    25
    00:01:19.500 --> 00:01:23.000
     that was driven by the sense across

    26
    00:01:22.700 --> 00:01:25.900
     the markets Market participants that maybe

    27
    00:01:25.900 --> 00:01:28.500
     the Fed was done raising interest rates, maybe

    28
    00:01:28.500 --> 00:01:31.400
     that the inflationary pressures that

    29
    00:01:31.400 --> 00:01:34.700
     we had seen in the spring of 2022. We're

    30
    00:01:34.700 --> 00:01:37.400
     starting to Abate and the market is

    31
    00:01:37.400 --> 00:01:40.800
     a forward-looking forward pricing mechanism. And so

    32
    00:01:42.200 --> 00:01:45.200
    In the fourth quarter, that's what it did. It looked forward.

    33
    00:01:45.200 --> 00:01:48.700
     It started to anticipate a period when the the

    34
    00:01:48.700 --> 00:01:51.300
     Fed was not raising interest rates and inflation would be tamed.

    35
    00:01:51.300 --> 00:01:55.100
     And of course what happened in December was

    36
    00:01:54.100 --> 00:01:57.800
     a bit of a comeuppance for

    37
    00:01:57.800 --> 00:02:00.400
     those Market participants who got a little bit ahead of

    38
    00:02:00.400 --> 00:02:03.500
     the fed and we saw a pullback in

    39
    00:02:03.500 --> 00:02:03.700
     December.

    40
    00:02:04.400 --> 00:02:07.600
    And markets responding to the fact that the FED said well, no,

    41
    00:02:07.600 --> 00:02:10.500
     we're pretty set on continuing to raise rates.

    42
    00:02:10.500 --> 00:02:12.800
     And and we think we're gonna keep them higher longer.

    43
    00:02:13.700 --> 00:02:16.500
    As we rolled into the first quarter of this year. We saw

    44
    00:02:16.500 --> 00:02:19.900
     a replay of a lot of those Dynamics coming into

    45
    00:02:19.900 --> 00:02:23.000
     January Market participants

    46
    00:02:22.300 --> 00:02:24.000
     again. It's sort of

    47
    00:02:25.400 --> 00:02:28.200
    Determined that this was the year the Fed was

    48
    00:02:28.200 --> 00:02:31.100
     going to stop rate and Market participants started to

    49
    00:02:31.100 --> 00:02:34.200
     look forward and price as if the not only

    50
    00:02:34.200 --> 00:02:37.600
     with the FED stop racing rates, but they would start to pull rates

    51
    00:02:37.600 --> 00:02:42.400
     back by the end of the year given where people

    52
    00:02:41.400 --> 00:02:45.300
     reading the tea leaves assumed the

    53
    00:02:45.300 --> 00:02:47.500
     economy would be by mid-year.

    54
    00:02:48.200 --> 00:02:51.800
    And so you saw a really robust Rebound in

    55
    00:02:51.800 --> 00:02:54.000
     January for a lot of the names that have been

    56
    00:02:54.200 --> 00:02:57.900
     really beat up in 2022 specifically the

    57
    00:02:57.900 --> 00:03:01.000
     large cab growth and Tech names and

    58
    00:03:00.300 --> 00:03:03.200
     so there was something of a reversion to

    59
    00:03:03.200 --> 00:03:06.300
     the mean in terms of those names really

    60
    00:03:06.300 --> 00:03:09.500
     leading the charge in January. Those are

    61
    00:03:09.500 --> 00:03:12.200
     the names that were most beaten up in 2022. Those are the

    62
    00:03:12.200 --> 00:03:15.500
     names that snap back fastest in the

    63
    00:03:15.500 --> 00:03:18.500
     first quarter. And so January where we

    64
    00:03:18.500 --> 00:03:22.900
     saw for instance the S&P down 20% for

    65
    00:03:22.900 --> 00:03:25.200
     2022. We saw

    66
    00:03:25.200 --> 00:03:28.100
     a Resurgence just in the month of January the SP was up

    67
    00:03:28.100 --> 00:03:31.400
     like eight percent and the NASDAQ double that right just on the

    68
    00:03:31.400 --> 00:03:34.400
     strength of kind of those large cap Tech names and of course what happened

    69
    00:03:34.400 --> 00:03:38.100
     as we rolled into February the news that

    70
    00:03:37.100 --> 00:03:40.400
     came out on the sort of

    71
    00:03:40.400 --> 00:03:43.400
     economic underpinnings specifically job data for

    72
    00:03:43.400 --> 00:03:47.100
     January really surprised Market

    73
    00:03:46.100 --> 00:03:48.100
     participants because

    74
    00:03:48.200 --> 00:03:52.400
    It was so robust. So strong it exceeded expectations. It

    75
    00:03:51.400 --> 00:03:54.800
     served as a really Stark reminder that we're

    76
    00:03:54.800 --> 00:03:55.500
     not out of the woods yet.

    77
    00:03:56.200 --> 00:03:59.500
    And and it sent shock waves

    78
    00:03:59.500 --> 00:04:02.400
     across the market in the sense that everyone who

    79
    00:04:02.400 --> 00:04:06.000
     had said. Okay. Well now the FED is gonna have to wind this down all

    80
    00:04:05.200 --> 00:04:08.400
     the sudden the the realized maybe not

    81
    00:04:08.400 --> 00:04:11.400
     right not only is the fed maybe not gonna wind this

    82
    00:04:11.400 --> 00:04:14.700
     down because the economy is hotter than we thought it was but we potentially

    83
    00:04:14.700 --> 00:04:17.600
     risk sort of a flare-up of inflation

    84
    00:04:17.600 --> 00:04:20.100
     just as it was coming down and the FED may have

    85
    00:04:20.100 --> 00:04:23.500
     to get more aggressive in in tackling that and

    86
    00:04:23.500 --> 00:04:27.000
     so February saw sort of a revisitation of

    87
    00:04:26.400 --> 00:04:29.500
     those expectations that market participants

    88
    00:04:29.500 --> 00:04:33.100
     had and as we rolled into March then all

    89
    00:04:32.100 --> 00:04:35.800
     eyes were on the Senate

    90
    00:04:35.800 --> 00:04:38.700
     hearings with the the chairman

    91
    00:04:38.700 --> 00:04:41.200
     of the fed and based on his

    92
    00:04:41.200 --> 00:04:44.700
     comments Futures skyrocketed for an expectation

    93
    00:04:44.700 --> 00:04:47.200
     of a 50 basis point raise at

    94
    00:04:47.200 --> 00:04:50.500
     the end of March the Futures went up to like a 70% chance that

    95
    00:04:50.500 --> 00:04:53.300
     the Fed was gonna raise 50 basis points, and

    96
    00:04:53.300 --> 00:04:55.500
     of course what happened then you know days later.

    97
    00:04:56.100 --> 00:05:00.000
    Started imploding right and that sort

    98
    00:04:59.100 --> 00:05:03.000
     of Royal financial markets and

    99
    00:05:02.500 --> 00:05:05.200
     the FED did end up raising rates. But

    100
    00:05:05.200 --> 00:05:08.200
     only by 25 basis points after they had worked to

    101
    00:05:08.200 --> 00:05:11.200
     sort of rescue. I don't know rescues the

    102
    00:05:11.200 --> 00:05:15.500
     right term but step in aggressively and calm markets

    103
    00:05:14.500 --> 00:05:17.200
     particularly folks who

    104
    00:05:17.200 --> 00:05:20.600
     had cash on deposited Banks to keep sort

    105
    00:05:20.600 --> 00:05:23.200
     of a contagion effect and a larger Bank Run taking place.

    106
    00:05:23.200 --> 00:05:26.800
     Right? So we end the first quarter with a really

    107
    00:05:26.800 --> 00:05:29.900
     sort of wild trip of markets shooting

    108
    00:05:29.900 --> 00:05:32.500
     up coming back down a lot of volatility a lot

    109
    00:05:32.500 --> 00:05:35.400
     of fear injected in markets in March with the

    110
    00:05:35.400 --> 00:05:38.300
     headlines and yet at the end of the quarter you finished up

    111
    00:05:38.300 --> 00:05:41.900
     pretty again pretty solidly across

    112
    00:05:41.900 --> 00:05:45.000
     us markets International Development markets emerging

    113
    00:05:44.400 --> 00:05:47.700
     markets in fixed income inequities, right?

    114
    00:05:47.700 --> 00:05:50.400
     We it was a it was a pretty decent first

    115
    00:05:50.400 --> 00:05:53.800
     quarter from a return perspective despite all of that. Yeah sure.

    116
    00:05:53.800 --> 00:05:56.000
     It was like it's a very interesting quarter.

    117
    00:05:56.100 --> 00:05:59.200
    And I'd like the way you put it on the things the kind of the Resurgence of

    118
    00:05:59.200 --> 00:06:03.100
     these tech companies that didn't have a great year last year, but you're

    119
    00:06:02.100 --> 00:06:05.500
     seeing asset classes such as the energy

    120
    00:06:05.500 --> 00:06:08.600
     sector right who had a great year last year is to

    121
    00:06:08.600 --> 00:06:11.300
     use your your term of aversion to the mean right? They had

    122
    00:06:11.300 --> 00:06:14.500
     a tough time in the first quarter, right? Yeah. Yeah and and frankly

    123
    00:06:14.500 --> 00:06:18.200
     prices have been coming down in oil and gas pretty

    124
    00:06:17.200 --> 00:06:18.800
     consistently.

    125
    00:06:19.200 --> 00:06:22.800
    Since last fall so we did see a continuation of that. I

    126
    00:06:22.800 --> 00:06:27.300
     do think and likely there's

    127
    00:06:26.300 --> 00:06:29.200
     more conversation to be had

    128
    00:06:29.200 --> 00:06:32.900
     around this but the concern that I have or

    129
    00:06:32.900 --> 00:06:35.500
     or would have based on

    130
    00:06:35.500 --> 00:06:38.600
     how markets performed in the first quarter is that

    131
    00:06:38.600 --> 00:06:41.900
     it was so dominated by a

    132
    00:06:41.900 --> 00:06:44.100
     handful of names, right? We we've seen

    133
    00:06:44.100 --> 00:06:47.300
     this Dynamic before where we're

    134
    00:06:47.300 --> 00:06:51.000
     sort of the top largest growth Tech

    135
    00:06:50.300 --> 00:06:53.800
     names sort of dominate performance

    136
    00:06:53.800 --> 00:06:56.500
     of the market and we and we saw that again in

    137
    00:06:56.500 --> 00:07:01.500
     the first quarter right? You think about Facebook alphabet

    138
    00:07:00.500 --> 00:07:04.700
     Apple Google Netflix, right?

    139
    00:07:03.700 --> 00:07:06.500
     All of those firms were

    140
    00:07:06.500 --> 00:07:09.500
     really been challenged in 2022 had a

    141
    00:07:09.500 --> 00:07:12.300
     nice Resurgence across the first quarter, but when

    142
    00:07:12.300 --> 00:07:16.000
     you dig deeper into the performance particularly here domestically what

    143
    00:07:15.200 --> 00:07:18.900
     you see is they were the lion

    144
    00:07:19.100 --> 00:07:22.400
    Care of that return that we saw the market it was once again

    145
    00:07:22.400 --> 00:07:27.100
     the fact that these top handful of names represent twenty

    146
    00:07:25.100 --> 00:07:28.600
     plus percent of the overall

    147
    00:07:28.600 --> 00:07:32.000
     market, right? So think S&P 500 has got ostensibly 500

    148
    00:07:31.500 --> 00:07:34.700
     names in it the top 10 names

    149
    00:07:34.700 --> 00:07:38.000
     accounted for all at

    150
    00:07:37.100 --> 00:07:40.400
     least 80% of that return right the

    151
    00:07:40.400 --> 00:07:43.300
     top top five names half of it, right? So so

    152
    00:07:43.300 --> 00:07:46.400
     again, you're getting a lot of that return concentrated in

    153
    00:07:46.400 --> 00:07:47.000
     these names.

    154
    00:07:47.900 --> 00:07:51.600
    Because they're so large disproportionately to

    155
    00:07:50.600 --> 00:07:55.200
     the other names in those indices

    156
    00:07:54.200 --> 00:07:57.300
     and it lit. It's the rising tide lifting

    157
    00:07:57.300 --> 00:08:00.200
     all boats, but the concern that you

    158
    00:08:00.200 --> 00:08:03.100
     have with that and we saw that in 2022 when the

    159
    00:08:03.100 --> 00:08:06.600
     air goes out of the balloon to a degree. Well that

    160
    00:08:06.600 --> 00:08:09.500
     can be a double-edged sword. Right if those names start

    161
    00:08:09.500 --> 00:08:13.000
     to pull back in valuations, you

    162
    00:08:12.300 --> 00:08:15.400
     could see that turn around and become an anchor pulling

    163
    00:08:15.400 --> 00:08:19.000
     markets down, right and that can happen very quickly just based

    164
    00:08:18.100 --> 00:08:21.600
     on the fact that it's so concentrated in a

    165
    00:08:21.600 --> 00:08:24.000
     handful of names that are all sort of in the

    166
    00:08:24.300 --> 00:08:27.100
     same kind of economic Waters right in terms of kind of

    167
    00:08:27.100 --> 00:08:30.600
     this large growth Tech, you know richly valued.

    168
    00:08:30.600 --> 00:08:33.100
     Yeah. It sounds a lot like me, you know, I've

    169
    00:08:33.100 --> 00:08:37.200
     had these conversations over the years even going back before 2022

    170
    00:08:36.200 --> 00:08:39.700
     coming out of the pandemic

    171
    00:08:39.700 --> 00:08:42.300
     and those tech stocks. They were the story they were leading

    172
    00:08:42.300 --> 00:08:45.400
     the charge and what I'm hearing you say, is that sort

    173
    00:08:45.400 --> 00:08:47.800
     of the casing q1, but that double-ed

    174
    00:08:47.800 --> 00:08:50.700
    word is just going back 2022 would

    175
    00:08:50.700 --> 00:08:53.700
     be an example of if you're not well Diversified

    176
    00:08:53.700 --> 00:08:56.800
     that could be a painful experience it can and I'm

    177
    00:08:56.800 --> 00:08:57.900
     I'm reminded of

    178
    00:08:59.300 --> 00:09:02.400
    The experience that we had coming out of the tech bubble,

    179
    00:09:02.400 --> 00:09:05.300
     right? So if you think about if in fact

    180
    00:09:05.300 --> 00:09:08.300
     the run-up invaluations in this sort of handful of

    181
    00:09:08.300 --> 00:09:11.400
     techniques is analogous to what we saw in

    182
    00:09:11.400 --> 00:09:12.000
     the late 90s.

    183
    00:09:14.200 --> 00:09:17.300
    They were so richly valued that when the

    184
    00:09:17.300 --> 00:09:20.600
     tech Bubble Burst it took a decade the Lost

    185
    00:09:20.600 --> 00:09:24.200
     decade right of just you know, subpar returns

    186
    00:09:23.200 --> 00:09:26.300
     for the valuations to get

    187
    00:09:26.300 --> 00:09:29.500
     back to a place where markets could then start

    188
    00:09:29.500 --> 00:09:32.400
     to take off again. And so the concern that

    189
    00:09:32.400 --> 00:09:36.200
     that one might have is valuations are

    190
    00:09:35.200 --> 00:09:40.400
     still Rich, right? Even after 2022 on

    191
    00:09:39.400 --> 00:09:43.200
     a Price to Book basis very

    192
    00:09:42.200 --> 00:09:45.600
     expensive on a price to

    193
    00:09:45.600 --> 00:09:50.500
     forward earnings basis. It's expensive and

    194
    00:09:48.500 --> 00:09:51.600
     so it's not

    195
    00:09:51.600 --> 00:09:54.600
     as if these are our Bargains to

    196
    00:09:54.600 --> 00:09:57.800
     be had in a Marketplace that that's discounting

    197
    00:09:57.800 --> 00:10:00.700
     them. They are still incredibly expensive. And so

    198
    00:10:00.700 --> 00:10:03.400
     anything that goes wrong right if the

    199
    00:10:03.400 --> 00:10:06.300
     if in fact the economy runs into turbulence at

    200
    00:10:06.300 --> 00:10:09.700
     some point or the expectations for growth, I mean,

    201
    00:10:09.700 --> 00:10:12.600
     you know, we're in earning season and Netflix had sort

    202
    00:10:12.600 --> 00:10:14.100
     of positive numbers, but

    203
    00:10:14.100 --> 00:10:17.700
    They sort of gave lackluster guidance for next quarters

    204
    00:10:17.700 --> 00:10:20.400
     growth. Right? So all you need is for for Market

    205
    00:10:20.400 --> 00:10:23.400
     participants to to a once again sour on the

    206
    00:10:23.400 --> 00:10:27.400
     prospects of these names and you're right back to it's

    207
    00:10:26.400 --> 00:10:29.300
     too too rich like I'm paying

    208
    00:10:29.300 --> 00:10:32.500
     too much today for for earnings in

    209
    00:10:32.500 --> 00:10:35.100
     the future that may or may not materialize right? And so

    210
    00:10:35.100 --> 00:10:38.700
     I've got to pay less and so the price has to come down. Yeah, right. And

    211
    00:10:38.700 --> 00:10:41.300
     again, I'm not suggesting that we have a lost decade

    212
    00:10:41.300 --> 00:10:44.200
     in front of us, but this potentially room to run

    213
    00:10:44.200 --> 00:10:48.300
     if markets turn and I think that's the the concern that

    214
    00:10:47.300 --> 00:10:50.100
     I would share with investors. That's what I

    215
    00:10:50.100 --> 00:10:53.500
     prepare them for. Hey, we'll take what we get. Right? We're happy

    216
    00:10:53.500 --> 00:10:54.700
     to get those returns, but

    217
    00:10:56.200 --> 00:10:59.500
    This could still be valve this this, you know, we're in the third inning potentially

    218
    00:10:59.500 --> 00:11:02.900
     look or fourth ending. There's a lot of game left and we're

    219
    00:11:02.900 --> 00:11:05.000
     just gonna buckle up and be ready for it. Yeah, and what is

    220
    00:11:05.300 --> 00:11:09.200
     interesting what this quarter and you detect upon that I'd love to get your thoughts developed International

    221
    00:11:08.200 --> 00:11:11.300
     to having a very good quarter.

    222
    00:11:11.300 --> 00:11:14.400
     I mean when we saw these large Tech

    223
    00:11:14.400 --> 00:11:17.600
     names and in the past when they had their run prior to 2022, it

    224
    00:11:17.600 --> 00:11:20.600
     was a pretty much us dominated run up.

    225
    00:11:21.800 --> 00:11:24.500
    Give us some commentary on what we're saying in the developed International

    226
    00:11:24.500 --> 00:11:27.100
     Space. Yeah, I think some of

    227
    00:11:27.100 --> 00:11:31.600
     it is the Resurgence of the

    228
    00:11:32.900 --> 00:11:35.700
    strength of the sort

    229
    00:11:35.700 --> 00:11:38.200
     of the the companies that are there that have

    230
    00:11:38.200 --> 00:11:42.000
     sort of suffered through a decade of kind of sub-par performance

    231
    00:11:41.300 --> 00:11:45.400
     and they were in a much stronger financial

    232
    00:11:44.400 --> 00:11:47.300
     position. Then they

    233
    00:11:47.300 --> 00:11:51.300
     were for instance going into the global financial crisis, right and they

    234
    00:11:50.300 --> 00:11:53.700
     weren't super expensive. Right?

    235
    00:11:53.700 --> 00:11:58.100
     So from a perspective of they were kind of relatively cheaply

    236
    00:11:56.100 --> 00:11:59.100
     priced compared to

    237
    00:11:59.100 --> 00:12:02.500
     US stocks. And so if we look at just the performance

    238
    00:12:02.500 --> 00:12:06.100
     the they don't have to have that much right

    239
    00:12:05.100 --> 00:12:09.300
     surprise upside.

    240
    00:12:10.300 --> 00:12:14.300
    To have nice performance right across the board or

    241
    00:12:13.300 --> 00:12:16.200
     relatively decent performs.

    242
    00:12:16.700 --> 00:12:19.800
    So I think people were pleasantly surprised by

    243
    00:12:19.800 --> 00:12:23.500
     some of the financial resilience in

    244
    00:12:22.500 --> 00:12:25.200
     Europe particularly coming out of

    245
    00:12:25.200 --> 00:12:28.900
     the effects of the the Russian Ukraine

    246
    00:12:28.900 --> 00:12:31.600
     conflict and looking at the impact that

    247
    00:12:31.600 --> 00:12:34.500
     for instance the the price of gas price

    248
    00:12:34.500 --> 00:12:37.100
     of oil I had in places like Germany and the fact

    249
    00:12:37.100 --> 00:12:40.300
     that they sort of got through that not unscathed but

    250
    00:12:40.300 --> 00:12:43.700
     you know, the the avoided the apocalypse

    251
    00:12:43.700 --> 00:12:47.000
     right the gasoline apocalypse over the course of the

    252
    00:12:46.600 --> 00:12:49.300
     winter right that it was relatively mild. So

    253
    00:12:49.300 --> 00:12:52.600
     I think that from that perspective markets sort

    254
    00:12:52.600 --> 00:12:55.600
     of said rewarded International developed

    255
    00:12:55.600 --> 00:12:58.900
     businesses with valuations that

    256
    00:12:58.900 --> 00:13:01.400
     seemed a little more reasonable than the

    257
    00:13:01.400 --> 00:13:04.000
     valuations in the US. Yeah, that makes a lot of sense and thank you

    258
    00:13:04.200 --> 00:13:07.900
     for that. Yeah, and and I would call I would suggest that

    259
    00:13:07.900 --> 00:13:10.200
     Emerging Markets are in a similar but

    260
    00:13:10.200 --> 00:13:14.300
     different position right again a little more financially

    261
    00:13:13.300 --> 00:13:16.300
     robust in terms of the underpinnings.

    262
    00:13:17.300 --> 00:13:20.100
    Of those companies relative to where we've seen Cycles where people

    263
    00:13:20.100 --> 00:13:23.100
     are risk off and and sort of beating down

    264
    00:13:23.100 --> 00:13:26.200
     in price. I think anytime you have a lot of volatility people are

    265
    00:13:26.200 --> 00:13:29.700
     hesitant to take a bunch of risk. So Emerging Markets

    266
    00:13:29.700 --> 00:13:32.800
     could be a little more volatile as you would expect but

    267
    00:13:32.800 --> 00:13:35.100
     I think from evaluation standpoint there's room to run

    268
    00:13:35.100 --> 00:13:38.600
     as well over time relative to the US let's let's

    269
    00:13:38.600 --> 00:13:41.300
     look at the other side of the coin and talk a

    270
    00:13:41.300 --> 00:13:44.500
     little bit about bonds because that's been quite the Hot Topic lately. We've been

    271
    00:13:44.500 --> 00:13:47.900
     getting a lot of inquiries from advisors and investors alike

    272
    00:13:47.900 --> 00:13:50.700
     about the fixed income market. So give us

    273
    00:13:50.700 --> 00:13:52.300
     a little perspective of what's happening in.

    274
    00:13:53.500 --> 00:13:57.300
    Global fixed income right? Well, if you recall 2022

    275
    00:13:56.300 --> 00:13:59.500
     was a historically bad year

    276
    00:13:59.500 --> 00:14:02.900
     for Boston certainly, right as as fed as

    277
    00:14:02.900 --> 00:14:05.500
     the FED raised interest rates are not just the FED but central banks

    278
    00:14:05.500 --> 00:14:08.500
     essentially around the world except for the Asian

    279
    00:14:08.500 --> 00:14:11.100
     China and Japan those central banks not quite

    280
    00:14:11.100 --> 00:14:14.600
     as much but globally central banks at the

    281
    00:14:14.600 --> 00:14:17.600
     impact of course of challenging the yield right

    282
    00:14:17.600 --> 00:14:20.900
     and as we know yield in price or are sort of inverse Lee

    283
    00:14:20.900 --> 00:14:23.300
     related and so as yield was pushed up by raising

    284
    00:14:23.300 --> 00:14:26.900
     rates price came down and and it had a pretty dramatic

    285
    00:14:26.900 --> 00:14:29.900
     impact across the yield curve

    286
    00:14:29.900 --> 00:14:32.400
     and that was globally as well the United

    287
    00:14:32.400 --> 00:14:32.400
     States.

    288
    00:14:33.200 --> 00:14:36.400
    2022 pretty much a very bad. No good year for

    289
    00:14:36.400 --> 00:14:39.400
     Bond holders rolling into the first quarter

    290
    00:14:39.400 --> 00:14:42.400
     a lot of those same sort of macro dynamics that

    291
    00:14:42.400 --> 00:14:45.400
     we talked about with equities was

    292
    00:14:45.400 --> 00:14:48.500
     true to fix income as well the expectation the bond

    293
    00:14:48.500 --> 00:14:51.800
     market pricing that they think the FED will essentially

    294
    00:14:51.800 --> 00:14:54.600
     be done at some point this year raising rates

    295
    00:14:54.600 --> 00:14:58.100
     had the impact of markets rallying

    296
    00:14:57.100 --> 00:15:01.300
     to a degree and then of course when there

    297
    00:15:00.300 --> 00:15:04.100
     was volatility injected because of banking issues

    298
    00:15:03.100 --> 00:15:07.300
     you continued to see a pullback

    299
    00:15:06.300 --> 00:15:09.700
     on the the yield

    300
    00:15:09.700 --> 00:15:13.000
     right? So at at some points we saw for instance

    301
    00:15:12.200 --> 00:15:15.400
     the the 10 year get up over four and we

    302
    00:15:15.400 --> 00:15:18.500
     saw a pullback as yields come down then of course prices go

    303
    00:15:18.500 --> 00:15:21.400
     up. And so you saw a nice robust kind of response over

    304
    00:15:21.400 --> 00:15:24.500
     the first quarter of prices coming up for bonds that had

    305
    00:15:24.500 --> 00:15:27.500
     the impact and that was true for treasuries and corporates

    306
    00:15:27.500 --> 00:15:30.400
     and international bonds, right? So across the

    307
    00:15:30.400 --> 00:15:32.900
     Spectrum you had sort of a nice performance.

    308
    00:15:33.300 --> 00:15:37.100
    For bonds for the first quarter. And again, it's unusual

    309
    00:15:36.100 --> 00:15:39.400
     for fixed income and Equity to look and

    310
    00:15:39.400 --> 00:15:42.100
     behave very similarly. That was one of

    311
    00:15:42.100 --> 00:15:45.700
     the things that was so unusual about 2022, but there's still

    312
    00:15:45.700 --> 00:15:48.500
     sort of Behaving the same way based on the same Outlook

    313
    00:15:48.500 --> 00:15:51.500
     that at some point interest rates stop going up

    314
    00:15:51.500 --> 00:15:54.500
     or stop getting ratcheted up by central banks.

    315
    00:15:54.500 --> 00:15:57.100
     And so that Dynamic is is kind of

    316
    00:15:57.100 --> 00:16:00.700
     floating all the boats to this degree and so

    317
    00:16:00.700 --> 00:16:03.500
     fixed income has had a robust first quarter.

    318
    00:16:04.400 --> 00:16:07.700
    Remains to be seen how the rest of the year plays

    319
    00:16:07.700 --> 00:16:10.400
     out and and you know, frankly we

    320
    00:16:10.400 --> 00:16:13.200
     continued to see the a deep

    321
    00:16:13.200 --> 00:16:16.200
     inversion in the yield curve, especially at the

    322
    00:16:16.200 --> 00:16:19.100
     very shortest end of the O curve relative to the

    323
    00:16:19.100 --> 00:16:22.700
     10 year. And as you know that has historically sort

    324
    00:16:22.700 --> 00:16:25.300
     of been a warning sign of

    325
    00:16:25.300 --> 00:16:28.600
     potential economic stress recessions right

    326
    00:16:28.600 --> 00:16:32.100
     as an indicator and it has remained it

    327
    00:16:31.100 --> 00:16:34.100
     inverted for some time now

    328
    00:16:34.100 --> 00:16:37.900
     and that inversion has only gotten deeper on the shortest end. So,

    329
    00:16:37.900 --> 00:16:40.200
     you know again you would want to continue

    330
    00:16:40.200 --> 00:16:43.700
     to watch that and be cognizant of it. I think the takeaway

    331
    00:16:43.700 --> 00:16:46.500
     from this is much like with equities. It's best

    332
    00:16:46.500 --> 00:16:49.200
     to be sort of broad based Diversified. You never

    333
    00:16:49.200 --> 00:16:53.000
     know what part of the Yoke curve is gonna move relative to this and

    334
    00:16:52.900 --> 00:16:56.800
     it's good to have exposure

    335
    00:16:55.800 --> 00:16:58.600
     not just us treasuries, but

    336
    00:16:58.600 --> 00:17:01.200
     the corporates and not just us bonds, but the international

    337
    00:17:01.200 --> 00:17:04.300
     bonds that there are benefits built into the pricing of all

    338
    00:17:04.900 --> 00:17:08.400
    And as we start to see a decoupling of Central

    339
    00:17:07.400 --> 00:17:10.400
     Bank activity, yes, they've been

    340
    00:17:10.400 --> 00:17:13.700
     acting pretty much in concert, but at some point central banks

    341
    00:17:13.700 --> 00:17:16.800
     start to peel off right and they get back to focusing on

    342
    00:17:16.800 --> 00:17:19.100
     the handling kind of

    343
    00:17:19.100 --> 00:17:22.300
     their domestic concerns. And as they do that it will

    344
    00:17:22.300 --> 00:17:25.600
     have varying diversification impacts for bonds

    345
    00:17:25.600 --> 00:17:28.500
     around the globe the way stocks and bonds behaves

    346
    00:17:28.500 --> 00:17:31.300
     in 2022 with similar and then into this quarter. We're

    347
    00:17:31.300 --> 00:17:34.500
     seeing some decent returns globally across those two

    348
    00:17:34.500 --> 00:17:37.800
     macro asset classes. We're seeing

    349
    00:17:37.800 --> 00:17:40.300
     some of a mixed bag that last Factor investors

    350
    00:17:40.300 --> 00:17:43.400
     from a factor perspective, right? But let's

    351
    00:17:43.400 --> 00:17:46.200
     shift a little bit and talk about factors for a moment.

    352
    00:17:46.200 --> 00:17:49.300
     We're a factor investors are listeners The Avengers that

    353
    00:17:49.300 --> 00:17:52.300
     we work with our have clients invested in

    354
    00:17:52.300 --> 00:17:55.500
     these Factor portfolios. What did we see from a factor standpoint

    355
    00:17:55.500 --> 00:17:58.800
     in the first quarter of 2023 if

    356
    00:17:58.800 --> 00:18:01.400
     you think about the factor of value, it's just the the

    357
    00:18:01.400 --> 00:18:04.300
     cheaper stocks outperform the more expensive stocks over time and as

    358
    00:18:04.300 --> 00:18:04.500
     you know,

    359
    00:18:04.800 --> 00:18:07.800
    We had a long run where that wasn't true. Right we're

    360
    00:18:07.800 --> 00:18:10.300
     growth stocks were just outperforming value to the

    361
    00:18:10.300 --> 00:18:13.200
     point that everybody was sort of Naval gazing wondering his value

    362
    00:18:13.200 --> 00:18:16.800
     dead. Does this even make sense anymore? And and what

    363
    00:18:16.800 --> 00:18:19.400
     we sort of looking at it determined was

    364
    00:18:19.400 --> 00:18:22.400
     no actually values kind of in line with what it's always done. It's

    365
    00:18:22.400 --> 00:18:25.300
     growth. That's so unusual. Yeah, right and that we're

    366
    00:18:25.300 --> 00:18:28.300
     back to the story about the large tech stocks and get over evaluation. Right?

    367
    00:18:28.300 --> 00:18:31.900
     And so last year was a great year for Value, right? Even

    368
    00:18:31.900 --> 00:18:34.500
     though it was down right value outperform growth

    369
    00:18:34.500 --> 00:18:37.800
     by a good 20% Oh, yeah, absolutely and it

    370
    00:18:37.800 --> 00:18:40.700
     was sort of that Snapback to recognition of

    371
    00:18:40.700 --> 00:18:43.300
     hey one of my paying for right and and these things

    372
    00:18:43.300 --> 00:18:46.200
     have gotten incredibly overvalued on the

    373
    00:18:46.200 --> 00:18:46.600
     growth side.

    374
    00:18:47.300 --> 00:18:50.500
    And so it shouldn't come as a surprise then if there's a reversal of

    375
    00:18:50.500 --> 00:18:53.600
     that Dynamic that value might underperform growth

    376
    00:18:53.600 --> 00:18:56.500
     over the first quarter. And of course, that's what we observed right

    377
    00:18:56.500 --> 00:18:59.300
     that value underperformed growth. It was

    378
    00:18:59.300 --> 00:19:02.300
     those large kind of growthy names that took off and and so that

    379
    00:19:02.300 --> 00:19:05.700
     that factor shows up and demonstrates

    380
    00:19:05.700 --> 00:19:08.300
     that thighs right. So again kind of

    381
    00:19:08.300 --> 00:19:11.600
     the academic research that smaller cap

    382
    00:19:11.600 --> 00:19:14.400
     names tend to outperform larger cab

    383
    00:19:14.400 --> 00:19:17.800
     names over time rolling into the first quarter large

    384
    00:19:17.800 --> 00:19:20.500
     caps outperform small caps, right again being led

    385
    00:19:20.500 --> 00:19:23.500
     by that large growthy and so small caps

    386
    00:19:23.500 --> 00:19:26.800
     tended to underperform in general. What's interesting

    387
    00:19:26.800 --> 00:19:29.300
     is across factor is

    388
    00:19:29.300 --> 00:19:32.300
     one of the reasons you want to hold small caps isn't necessarily the size

    389
    00:19:32.300 --> 00:19:35.300
     Factor premium associated with that because

    390
    00:19:35.300 --> 00:19:38.700
     that's come under some scrutiny of

    391
    00:19:38.700 --> 00:19:41.400
     Lee as academics kind of look at that. Say what

    392
    00:19:41.400 --> 00:19:42.200
     do we actually getting here?

    393
    00:19:42.900 --> 00:19:46.000
    But what really expresses itself

    394
    00:19:45.300 --> 00:19:48.500
     in small camp names or all the other factors, right? So

    395
    00:19:48.500 --> 00:19:51.100
     the reason you'd want to hold a small cap is not just

    396
    00:19:51.100 --> 00:19:54.200
     because you get a benefit versus large caps, but because you get

    397
    00:19:54.200 --> 00:19:57.600
     a really strong value signal a really strong momentum really

    398
    00:19:57.600 --> 00:20:00.200
     strong quality, right all of these things. And so if we

    399
    00:20:00.200 --> 00:20:03.300
     look at small caps the performance of small caps for

    400
    00:20:03.300 --> 00:20:06.700
     the first quarter, you actually got to really strong quality signal

    401
    00:20:06.700 --> 00:20:09.700
     in small caps. So again a reason

    402
    00:20:09.700 --> 00:20:12.400
     why you want to have a multiple exposures for your

    403
    00:20:12.400 --> 00:20:15.400
     factors not just pick any one of these right so small

    404
    00:20:15.400 --> 00:20:18.400
     caps under form large caps, but quality did really well inside

    405
    00:20:18.400 --> 00:20:21.300
     small camps that makes up the next category is

    406
    00:20:21.300 --> 00:20:24.400
     momentum. And what's interesting about markets that are sort of

    407
    00:20:24.400 --> 00:20:27.500
     whipsawing one way or the other that momentum tends to

    408
    00:20:27.500 --> 00:20:30.400
     have a tougher time in markets where the signal is really

    409
    00:20:30.400 --> 00:20:33.100
     hard to pick up where there's a lot of whipsawing effect up and down on the

    410
    00:20:33.100 --> 00:20:37.000
     other way momentum tends to kind of get whipped around with that.

    411
    00:20:37.700 --> 00:20:40.200
    Eventually when markets start to pick

    412
    00:20:40.200 --> 00:20:43.300
     up Trend whether that's down for a significant period of

    413
    00:20:43.300 --> 00:20:46.500
     time like in 2022 momentum does well or up right

    414
    00:20:46.500 --> 00:20:50.000
     for a significant period of time and so you

    415
    00:20:49.200 --> 00:20:52.400
     would expect momentum to kind

    416
    00:20:52.400 --> 00:20:55.400
     of settle down as markets kind of settle down

    417
    00:20:55.400 --> 00:20:59.600
     and we see less whipsawing and more directionality. However, and

    418
    00:20:59.600 --> 00:21:03.300
     I mentioned it earlier with small caps quality this idea

    419
    00:21:02.300 --> 00:21:05.000
     that there may be

    420
    00:21:05.200 --> 00:21:08.800
     a flight to Quality in times when the

    421
    00:21:08.800 --> 00:21:11.100
     there's a lot of volatility. Well one of the

    422
    00:21:11.100 --> 00:21:14.800
     reasons you see that is because higher quality earnings tend to

    423
    00:21:14.800 --> 00:21:17.400
     hold up better in downturns. They have a premium

    424
    00:21:17.400 --> 00:21:21.300
     associated with them and we saw that very clearly quality

    425
    00:21:20.300 --> 00:21:23.200
     was one of the areas that outperformed the market

    426
    00:21:23.200 --> 00:21:26.200
     over the first quarter and that was true not just in the

    427
    00:21:26.200 --> 00:21:30.200
     US but internationally as well interestingly in

    428
    00:21:29.200 --> 00:21:33.500
     Emerging Markets value quality

    429
    00:21:32.500 --> 00:21:35.600
     and low volatility did quite

    430
    00:21:35.600 --> 00:21:37.600
     well so value was still doing well in emerging.

    431
    00:21:37.700 --> 00:21:40.700
    Markets again a reason why you'd want to diversify

    432
    00:21:40.700 --> 00:21:43.400
     your Factor exposures not just in the US but

    433
    00:21:43.400 --> 00:21:46.900
     internationally as well and minimum volatility was

    434
    00:21:46.900 --> 00:21:49.800
     a contributor in us but lagged Market

    435
    00:21:49.800 --> 00:21:52.500
     beta on the whole a broadly

    436
    00:21:52.500 --> 00:21:55.900
     Diversified Factor exposure was I'd

    437
    00:21:55.900 --> 00:21:58.700
     say depending on what your tilts are helpful on

    438
    00:21:58.700 --> 00:22:02.200
     the downside when Market was volatile, but lagged

    439
    00:22:01.200 --> 00:22:04.900
     Market beta to a degree for the

    440
    00:22:04.900 --> 00:22:07.500
     first quarter where it outperformed in

    441
    00:22:07.500 --> 00:22:10.400
     2022. So again factors are a

    442
    00:22:10.400 --> 00:22:13.500
     long term investment. You wouldn't do it on based

    443
    00:22:13.500 --> 00:22:16.700
     on one quarter, but we we watch the horse race, right? Yeah.

    444
    00:22:16.700 --> 00:22:19.200
     Absolutely and I think a point that you

    445
    00:22:19.200 --> 00:22:22.400
     you said that really resonated with me is the notion of how these factors work

    446
    00:22:22.400 --> 00:22:25.800
     together right size and quality you mentioned

    447
    00:22:25.800 --> 00:22:29.200
     and so having a diverse portfolio

    448
    00:22:28.200 --> 00:22:30.700
     of integrated factors.

    449
    00:22:31.500 --> 00:22:32.800
    maintaining that for the long term

    450
    00:22:34.200 --> 00:22:37.400
    Should reward you over the long term. Yeah, and that's the

    451
    00:22:37.400 --> 00:22:40.800
     expectation. There are lots of factors out

    452
    00:22:40.800 --> 00:22:43.800
     there that have been identified in the academic literature when you

    453
    00:22:43.800 --> 00:22:46.400
     selectively go out and pick a handful of

    454
    00:22:46.400 --> 00:22:49.500
     those factors. The expectation is every single

    455
    00:22:49.500 --> 00:22:52.500
     one of those is going to be a positive contributor to

    456
    00:22:52.500 --> 00:22:55.400
     your portfolio over time, right you you

    457
    00:22:55.400 --> 00:22:58.300
     wouldn't necessarily pick one that you thought. Well, it's gonna be a loser but we're gonna hold on

    458
    00:22:58.300 --> 00:23:01.100
     to it, right you're picking all of these different factors of the

    459
    00:23:01.100 --> 00:23:04.700
     expectation that each one of those is going to be a

    460
    00:23:04.700 --> 00:23:07.300
     positive contributor over a period of time when you

    461
    00:23:07.300 --> 00:23:10.400
     weave them together you sort of iron out

    462
    00:23:10.400 --> 00:23:13.400
     the highs and lows of any one particular factor and

    463
    00:23:13.400 --> 00:23:17.100
     you get that very nice steady stream of

    464
    00:23:16.100 --> 00:23:19.500
     return into your

    465
    00:23:19.500 --> 00:23:22.300
     portfolio. That's generated by those Factor exposures. Yeah.

    466
    00:23:22.300 --> 00:23:25.400
     It's the old the old adage we're going for singles and doubles

    467
    00:23:25.400 --> 00:23:28.200
     not home runs, right? Yeah. Yeah exactly. So let's

    468
    00:23:28.200 --> 00:23:31.200
     talk a little bit about factors and fixed income and then

    469
    00:23:31.200 --> 00:23:34.100
     we can take a look at some of the the factors overseas.

    470
    00:23:34.100 --> 00:23:37.800
    As well, but I do want to spend some time on some of

    471
    00:23:37.800 --> 00:23:40.100
     the headlines. So why don't we

    472
    00:23:40.100 --> 00:23:44.000
     talk a little bit about us fixed income factors? Sure. So

    473
    00:23:43.600 --> 00:23:46.200
     as you know, right fat factors are

    474
    00:23:46.200 --> 00:23:49.800
     not an equity only thing. In fact, we see factors across

    475
    00:23:49.800 --> 00:23:53.600
     all different kinds of assets fixed income Commodities

    476
    00:23:52.600 --> 00:23:55.400
     housing real

    477
    00:23:55.400 --> 00:23:58.400
     estate, right all these I the concept of value for

    478
    00:23:58.400 --> 00:24:01.500
     instance and the concept of momentum right anything that has a price associated

    479
    00:24:01.500 --> 00:24:04.400
     with it stores can demonstrate these sort of

    480
    00:24:04.400 --> 00:24:07.200
     factors. And that's true. In fact fixed income the way we

    481
    00:24:07.200 --> 00:24:10.400
     think about factors and fixed incomes specifically is is kind

    482
    00:24:10.400 --> 00:24:13.400
     of interest rate risk, which is time, right? So think

    483
    00:24:13.400 --> 00:24:17.300
     about what we talked about with the yield curve inversion

    484
    00:24:16.300 --> 00:24:19.400
     and what was going on on the short end versus the

    485
    00:24:19.400 --> 00:24:23.500
     long end what we've observed in the

    486
    00:24:23.500 --> 00:24:26.200
     past. Let's call year was a really

    487
    00:24:26.200 --> 00:24:29.800
     strong interest rate risk lack

    488
    00:24:29.800 --> 00:24:32.600
     of benefit that you got for sort of being paid

    489
    00:24:32.600 --> 00:24:34.000
     over time, right?

    490
    00:24:34.100 --> 00:24:38.300
    And in theory, right you should get paid to hold

    491
    00:24:37.300 --> 00:24:41.100
     over time because there's less certainty

    492
    00:24:40.100 --> 00:24:43.500
     about what the future holds so you demand a

    493
    00:24:43.500 --> 00:24:46.800
     premium to hold something over time to lend over time. And

    494
    00:24:46.800 --> 00:24:49.200
     so when you have the short end

    495
    00:24:49.200 --> 00:24:52.500
     of the curve come up that tends to impact that interest

    496
    00:24:52.500 --> 00:24:55.500
     rate sets that risk that sensitivity because you're

    497
    00:24:55.500 --> 00:24:58.800
     not getting paid over time. You're getting paid actually on the

    498
    00:24:58.800 --> 00:25:01.700
     the shorter end potentially. So when you

    499
    00:25:01.700 --> 00:25:04.800
     see a pullback of rates,

    500
    00:25:04.800 --> 00:25:07.700
     right and price is going up you're seeing

    501
    00:25:07.700 --> 00:25:10.800
     that benefit playing out through the first quarter as well credit risk

    502
    00:25:10.800 --> 00:25:13.300
     is just the difference the buildup over

    503
    00:25:13.300 --> 00:25:16.300
     the risk free rate treasuries to account

    504
    00:25:16.300 --> 00:25:19.200
     for hey, you know a corporation has more risk than a government

    505
    00:25:19.200 --> 00:25:22.500
     and I should be paid that difference. And so you're investing

    506
    00:25:22.500 --> 00:25:25.200
     up and down the various yield curves that

    507
    00:25:25.200 --> 00:25:28.900
     build up on that and in this case credit risk really as

    508
    00:25:28.900 --> 00:25:31.900
     a factor wasn't a very solid contributor

    509
    00:25:31.900 --> 00:25:33.200
     for the first quarter slightly positive.

    510
    00:25:34.100 --> 00:25:37.200
    The the show really has been frankly for the

    511
    00:25:37.200 --> 00:25:40.500
     past 18 months were interest rate risk is in

    512
    00:25:40.500 --> 00:25:43.500
     terms of factor Premia in your portfolios.

    513
    00:25:43.500 --> 00:25:46.500
     And then Market is is again just Market

    514
    00:25:46.500 --> 00:25:49.800
     beta which is a buildup of all these different factors expressing themselves.

    515
    00:25:49.800 --> 00:25:53.200
     So on the whole positive Bond performance

    516
    00:25:52.200 --> 00:25:55.500
     being driven by changes to

    517
    00:25:55.500 --> 00:25:59.500
     the the yield curve in many cases and some

    518
    00:25:58.500 --> 00:26:01.400
     expectation that Bond markets are looking ahead

    519
    00:26:01.400 --> 00:26:04.600
     and pricing for a cessation of rate raises

    520
    00:26:04.600 --> 00:26:07.500
     by central banks. So so my expectation would

    521
    00:26:07.500 --> 00:26:10.200
     be for for fixed income investors again much like

    522
    00:26:10.200 --> 00:26:13.400
     Equity potentially more volatility here, right? The

    523
    00:26:13.400 --> 00:26:16.400
     the rodeo is not over the big bull riding

    524
    00:26:16.400 --> 00:26:18.200
     could yet be to come so

    525
    00:26:19.200 --> 00:26:22.400
    You know stay patient the the benefit here is

    526
    00:26:22.400 --> 00:26:25.400
     there's return associated with fixed income

    527
    00:26:25.400 --> 00:26:29.500
     to a degree. We haven't seen in 15 years. And so

    528
    00:26:29.500 --> 00:26:32.700
     let this play out. And again, these Factor

    529
    00:26:32.700 --> 00:26:35.600
     exposures are the expectation is over time. These are

    530
    00:26:35.600 --> 00:26:38.100
     going to be a additive to the returns that you

    531
    00:26:38.100 --> 00:26:40.700
     get from the bond market you had mentioned this in some of your previous comments.

    532
    00:26:42.500 --> 00:26:45.400
    Factors perform differently geographically too

    533
    00:26:45.400 --> 00:26:48.500
     right like value in the US might give you a different return

    534
    00:26:48.500 --> 00:26:51.300
     versus value and the international develop during the

    535
    00:26:51.300 --> 00:26:54.500
     Emerging Markets Arenas. So I think there's diversification story

    536
    00:26:54.500 --> 00:26:57.600
     there. Can you comment on that, please? Yeah. Well, yes, of

    537
    00:26:57.600 --> 00:27:00.100
     course and and I sort of made a comment

    538
    00:27:00.100 --> 00:27:01.300
     about as

    539
    00:27:02.300 --> 00:27:05.500
    central banks become decoupled and start to operate a

    540
    00:27:05.500 --> 00:27:09.000
     little more independently that it has an impact on the

    541
    00:27:11.300 --> 00:27:14.600
    local economies in all of these different markets as

    542
    00:27:14.600 --> 00:27:17.200
     an impact on their currencies. And so

    543
    00:27:17.200 --> 00:27:20.600
     when you think about fixed income the benefit that you get from

    544
    00:27:20.600 --> 00:27:23.300
     not only where you hold on

    545
    00:27:23.300 --> 00:27:26.500
     the curve and and the amount of credit that you're willing but that

    546
    00:27:26.500 --> 00:27:29.900
     you're going to diversify the various curves

    547
    00:27:29.900 --> 00:27:32.300
     that you hold and the where you

    548
    00:27:32.300 --> 00:27:35.900
     are on that across geographies and

    549
    00:27:35.900 --> 00:27:38.200
     then take into account the impact that

    550
    00:27:38.200 --> 00:27:42.200
     currencies might have right and so we know for equities

    551
    00:27:41.200 --> 00:27:45.100
     the the volatility signature

    552
    00:27:44.100 --> 00:27:47.100
     of equity is is so robust that

    553
    00:27:47.100 --> 00:27:50.600
     you're you tend to be willing to hold the volatility of

    554
    00:27:50.600 --> 00:27:53.900
     fluctuations and currency in in

    555
    00:27:53.900 --> 00:27:56.000
     fixed income. It tends not to pay you to do

    556
    00:27:56.200 --> 00:27:59.400
     that. And so I know for instance

    557
    00:27:59.400 --> 00:28:03.100
     that here at Cemetery you folks hedge back

    558
    00:28:03.100 --> 00:28:07.000
     to the dollar sure and that takes some of that volatility out,

    559
    00:28:06.600 --> 00:28:09.400
     right? And again, I think that's a benefit

    560
    00:28:09.400 --> 00:28:11.000
     for Factor investors because what you're

    561
    00:28:11.200 --> 00:28:14.300
    Is less volatility associated with fluctuations currency and

    562
    00:28:14.300 --> 00:28:18.000
     you're getting maybe stronger signal from these these

    563
    00:28:17.200 --> 00:28:20.900
     different sources of return across

    564
    00:28:20.900 --> 00:28:23.400
     different markets and they're all going to be hitting at

    565
    00:28:23.400 --> 00:28:26.700
     different times. Once the sort of the global economy

    566
    00:28:26.700 --> 00:28:29.200
     comes unpegged to what's going

    567
    00:28:29.200 --> 00:28:33.100
     on fighting inflation. Yeah until I think it's a perfect diversification story

    568
    00:28:32.100 --> 00:28:33.300
     and

    569
    00:28:34.100 --> 00:28:37.600
    we have a saying here that the only free lunch and investing is diversification. And

    570
    00:28:37.600 --> 00:28:40.900
     so we tout that investor should be embracing that Casey.

    571
    00:28:40.900 --> 00:28:43.400
     Thank you so much for joining us that concludes part one.

    572
    00:28:43.400 --> 00:28:46.600
     Please feel free to access other podcasts

    573
    00:28:46.600 --> 00:28:49.000
     that we have done and they can be

    574
    00:28:49.400 --> 00:28:52.600
     accessed anywhere you get your podcast. So please join Casey and

    575
    00:28:52.600 --> 00:28:56.000
     I for part two and our next series symmetry Partners

    576
    00:28:55.700 --> 00:28:58.800
     LLC is an investment advisor firm

    577
    00:28:58.800 --> 00:29:01.700
     registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission The

    578
    00:29:01.700 --> 00:29:04.600
     Firm only transacts business in states where it

    579
    00:29:04.600 --> 00:29:07.500
     is properly registered or excluded or

    580
    00:29:07.500 --> 00:29:11.200
     Exempted from registration requirements registration of

    581
    00:29:10.200 --> 00:29:13.600
     an investment advisor does not imply any

    582
    00:29:13.600 --> 00:29:16.400
     specific level of skill or training and does

    583
    00:29:16.400 --> 00:29:19.100
     not constitute an endorsement of the firm by the

    584
    00:29:19.100 --> 00:29:22.300
     commission. No one should assume that future performance of any

    585
    00:29:22.300 --> 00:29:26.300
     specific investment investment strategy product or

    586
    00:29:25.300 --> 00:29:28.300
     non-investment related content made

    587
    00:29:28.300 --> 00:29:31.800
     reference to directly or indirectly in this material will be

    588
    00:29:31.800 --> 00:29:32.400
     profitable.

    589
    00:29:33.400 --> 00:29:36.500
    As with any investment strategy there is the possibility of

    590
    00:29:36.500 --> 00:29:39.500
     profitability as well as loss due

    591
    00:29:39.500 --> 00:29:42.300
     to various factors including changing market

    592
    00:29:42.300 --> 00:29:44.700
     conditions and/or applicable laws.

    593
    00:29:45.300 --> 00:29:48.900
    The content may not be reflective of current opinions or

    594
    00:29:48.900 --> 00:29:51.600
     positions. Please note the material

    595
    00:29:51.600 --> 00:29:54.300
     is provided for educational and background use only

    596
    00:29:54.300 --> 00:29:58.000
     moreover. You should not assume that any discussion or information

    597
    00:29:57.800 --> 00:30:00.800
     contained in this material Services the

    598
    00:30:00.800 --> 00:30:04.400
     receipt of or as a substitute for personalized

    599
    00:30:03.400 --> 00:30:05.700
     investment advice.

     

    Show Me Your Friends and I'll Show You Your Future with Randy Smith

    Show Me Your Friends and I'll Show You Your Future with Randy Smith

    Bulletproof Dental Practice Podcast Episode 294

    Hosts: Dr. Peter Boulden & Dr. Craig Spodak

    Guest: Randy Smith

    Key Takeaways:
    Introduction
    Thoughts On Regional Banks
    TikTok Legislation
    Actionable Item To Move Out Of Regional Banks 
    Interest Rates
    Private Equity
    Take Time Aside 
    Low Cost Way To Stop Attrition


    References:

    Bulletproof Summit
    Bulletproof Mastermind

    Mighty Networks: Bulletproof Dental Practice
    Bulletproof ERC
    To Sell or NOT to Sell PLUS Mastermind Ski Retreat Recap 
    What Got You Here Won't Get You There: How Successful People Become Even More Successful 
    Warrior Sailing

     

    Tweetables:
    People, in the face of uncertainty, need a process. -Dr. Craig Spodak


    Recessions happen when people stop spending money.
    - Randy Smith


    Don’t look at anything with your face on the paper.
    - Randy Smith


    Look at everything from a macro view.
    - Randy Smith


    There comes a time when it’s the right time. -
    Randy Smith


    It doesn’t help that you’re really on people.
    -Dr. Craig Spodak


    Most deals don’t close.
    -Randy Smith


    So many people operate by gut.
    -Dr. Peter Boulden