Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Understanding the facts behind abortion debatesMost abortions occur early in pregnancy, are generally safe for women, and are based on accurate information, not political rhetoric or personal biases.

      The debate over abortion in the US, particularly in the context of the midterm elections, is centered around the potential impact of the Supreme Court and political leadership on women's reproductive rights. While emotions and moral beliefs play a significant role, it's crucial to separate facts from fiction. For instance, most abortions occur early in pregnancy when the fetus cannot feel pain, and the procedure itself is generally safe for women. The misconceptions surrounding abortion, including when it's performed and its impact on women, can be debunked through scientific research. It's essential to approach this topic with accurate information rather than political rhetoric or personal biases.

    • Formation of Fetus: A Burrito or a Sandwich?In the first few weeks of pregnancy, the zygote rapidly divides and forms a fetus, starting as a 'burrito' or a 'sandwich' shape, with a fully functional heart by around 6 weeks, although its size remains microscopic and its ability to feel pain is debated.

      During the first few weeks of pregnancy, a zygote, which is a tiny ball of cells, undergoes rapid cell division and starts to fold in on itself, forming a distinctive shape. This process, described as a "burrito" or a "sandwich," results in the formation of the fetus. At this stage, the embryo is less than a millimeter in size, and many women are not yet aware they are pregnant. The estimation of pregnancy progression is imprecise, and doctors often use gestational age, which starts from the first day of the last menstrual period. By around 6 weeks, the embryo has grown into a fetus and has a microscopic, fully functional heart, capable of pumping blood. Despite its tiny size, the fetus cannot be seen with the naked eye, yet it can potentially feel pain, a topic of much debate in discussions around abortion laws.

    • Fetal pain development timelinePain receptors form at 6 weeks but cannot sense pain, nerve fibers appear at 10 weeks but connections to brain not complete until 18-20 weeks, cortex necessary for understanding pain doesn't fully develop until end of second trimester, most abortions in US occur before fetus can feel pain.

      The ability for a fetus to feel pain is a complex process that involves the formation of pain receptors, the development of nerve fibers and the maturation of the brain. According to expert Amita, pain receptors begin to form around 6 weeks, but they cannot sense pain yet. Nerve fibers that can detect pain start to appear around 10 weeks, but the wiring that connects these signals to the spinal cord and brain does not fully develop until around 18-20 weeks. The cortex, which is necessary for understanding pain, does not fully develop until the end of the second trimester. Based on this information, most abortions in the US occur before the fetus is capable of feeling pain. Therefore, the debate surrounding fetal pain and abortion legislation is a complex issue that requires a nuanced understanding of fetal development.

    • Methods for Abortions during First TrimesterTwo common methods for abortions during the first trimester are medication abortion and surgical abortion. In medication abortion, pills block hormones and mimic miscarriage, while surgical abortion involves physically removing the pregnancy through the vagina and cervix.

      During the first trimester of pregnancy, which lasts for the first 12 weeks, most abortions are performed using two methods: medication abortion and surgical abortion. In a medication abortion, a woman takes pills called mifepristone and misoprostol to terminate the pregnancy. Mifepristone blocks the hormone progesterone, preventing the body from recognizing pregnancy, while misoprostol mimics the process of miscarriage, causing the uterus to expel the pregnancy. These pills should not be confused with birth control or the morning-after pill, which prevent fertilization rather than ending an existing pregnancy. In a surgical abortion, a doctor physically removes the pregnancy through the vagina and cervix, opening the cervix first to access the uterus. It is important to note that these procedures are not the same as a cesarean section, as they do not involve cutting or opening any new spaces in the body.

    • Abortion procedures depend on pregnancy stageEarly abortions use dilators and suction, later ones involve D&E with forceps, and third trimester abortions are rare

      Abortion procedures can vary greatly depending on the stage of pregnancy. For early abortions, dilators are used to open the cervix, and the pregnancy is removed using suction or instruments like tongs or graspers. The process is quick, taking only 30 seconds to 2 minutes. For later abortions, the fetus is too large for suction, so instruments like forceps are used for dilation and evacuation (D&E), which involves removing the fetus in parts. The process can be graphic, and the resulting fetal parts look like miniature human forms. Lisa, a healthcare professional, shared her experience of performing an abortion on a woman who was as pregnant as she was, feeling her own baby kick during the procedure, which was a powerful and emotional experience for her. Abortions in the third trimester are extremely rare.

    • Abortions in third trimester due to complications or abnormalitiesRisks of third trimester abortions are relatively low, and most women seeking them have already given birth to a child

      Third trimester abortions, which account for 1.3% of abortions in the US, are mostly performed due to serious complications or fetal abnormalities. These procedures are more complex than earlier abortions, involving injecting the fetus with a heart-stopping drug and inducing labor. Abortions can be categorized into medication (pills) and surgical (suction and forceps) methods, neither of which involves cutting a woman open. While some may view abortions as risky, the actual risks are relatively low, and the majority of women seeking abortions are in their twenties, thirties, and have already given birth to at least one child. At Whole Women's Health clinic in Texas, reporter Heather Rogers found that the demographic in the waiting room matched this data.

    • Reasons for Abortions: Financial, Timing, Partner-Related, and ReligiousApproximately 40% of women seeking abortions did so due to financial constraints, while other reasons included timing not being right and partner-related issues. Significant numbers of women obtaining abortions identified as Catholic, mainline protestant, or evangelical protestant.

      Women from various backgrounds, including religious ones, get abortions for a range of reasons, with financial difficulties being the most common. According to a 2013 study, approximately 40% of women seeking abortions did so due to financial constraints. Other reasons included the timing not being right and partner-related issues. Additionally, some women reported experiencing physical abuse from their partners. The religious aspect of abortion is often overlooked, but data from the Guttmacher Institute shows that around a quarter of women obtaining abortions identified as Catholic, and significant numbers identified as mainline protestant or evangelical protestant. This suggests that the issue of abortion is complex and multifaceted, and that it affects women from all walks of life. The risks involved in getting an abortion were also explored in Texas, but that discussion will be covered in subsequent parts of the podcast.

    • Doctors in Texas must disclose certain risks during abortion consultationsDespite scientific evidence showing no link between abortion and infertility, doctors in Texas are required by law to disclose this risk to patients. Providers must ensure clear and accurate information to help patients make informed decisions.

      During an abortion consultation in Texas, doctors are required by law to disclose certain risks, including infertility and breast cancer, to their patients. However, the way these risks are presented can be perceived as alarming and potentially misleading. For instance, during an observation at a clinic in San Antonio, the abortion provider, Dr. Bhavat Kumar, was seen reading the state-mandated script in a hurried and almost dismissive manner, without fully addressing patients' concerns. The infertility risk, in particular, can be particularly distressing for women. However, scientific evidence suggests that having an abortion in a safe and legal setting does not increase the risk of infertility. According to the UK's College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists, there is no proven association between abortion and infertility. Therefore, it is crucial for healthcare providers to provide accurate and clear information about the risks and benefits of abortion to ensure that patients make informed decisions.

    • Abortions do not increase risk of breast cancer or infertilityAbortions are generally safe with minimal short-term side effects and do not increase a woman's risk of breast cancer, infertility, or depression in the long-term.

      While there are potential short-term side effects from having an abortion such as cramping, stomach pain, and bleeding, the evidence suggests that abortions do not increase a woman's risk of developing breast cancer or becoming infertile. Furthermore, abortions are generally safer than childbirth and even some common medical procedures. Regarding the emotional impact, a study called the Turnaway Study followed women for five years after their abortions and found no increased risk of depression compared to carrying an unwanted pregnancy to term. It's important to note that personal experiences can vary, but the evidence suggests that the vast majority of women do not experience long-term negative emotional consequences from having an abortion.

    • No significant mental health harms for women who have had abortionsStudies show no mental health harm for women who had abortions, and they may be better off financially and educationally in the long run. Women's reasons for seeking abortions are based on their readiness for a baby.

      Studies, including Diana Greene Foster's, have found no significant mental health harms for women who have had abortions compared to those who carried their pregnancies to term. Over several years, these women showed similar levels of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder. Furthermore, research suggests that women who get abortions may be better off financially and educationally in the long run. However, differences have been found between women who got abortions and those who didn't but wanted one, such as employment status and poverty levels. For women in abusive relationships, having an abortion can lead to a decrease in violence from their partners due to severed ties. Overall, women's reasons for seeking abortions are realistic, and their decisions are often based on their readiness for a baby. Despite common misconceptions portrayed in pop culture, the research tells a different story.

    • Abortion and Mental HealthResearch contradicts belief that abortions increase depression or anxiety risk, but denial of abortion may lead to negative outcomes.

      The scientific evidence does not support the notion that women who have abortions are at a higher risk for depression or anxiety than those who don't. However, research shows that women who are denied an abortion may face negative consequences such as less money, less education, and fewer job opportunities. Abortions, typically performed in the first trimester using pills or suction, do not involve cutting a woman open and do not increase the risk of breast cancer or infertility. While some women may experience guilt or depression after an abortion, the majority do not, and those who have an abortion that they want are not more likely to experience depression than those who carry their pregnancies to term.

    Recent Episodes from Science Vs

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?
    We’re hearing stories of people having amazing, cosmic orgasms. So what buttons are they pressing to do this?? Well, it's just one. The “male G spot,” also called the “P spot,” because that P stands for prostate. Word on the street is that if you touch your prostate in just the right way — BAM — one helluva orgasm. But is that really true? And if you don't have a prostate (ahem, me): are you stuck with your garden variety orgasms? To get to the bottom of this, Science Vs surveyed almost 16,000 people about anal sex and masturbation! We also speak with Dr Dan Dickstein, Dr Tom Gaither and Neuroscientist Dr Nan Wise. Have an idea for a Science Vs episode? Let us know! On Instagram we're Science_Vs, Wendy's Tiktok is @wendyzukerman and our email is sciencevs@gimletmedia.com Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsMind-BlowingOrgasms In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Absolutely cosmic orgasms (04:47) Anal sex is big right now (08:52) What makes the prostate special (12:02) The hole story. The butthole story. (20:19) How to get a cosmic orgasm (29:19) Tips and tricks for great anal sex (34:54) The real G spot This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. A huge thank you to Sam Levang for her help analyzing our data. And Professor Caroline Pukall and Dan Dickstein for your help with our survey questions. Thanks to the researchers we spoke to including Dr Devon Hensel. Thanks to Jack Weinstein, Hunter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 20, 2024

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?
    Protein influencers are big right now, telling us that we're probably missing out on the protein we need — and giving us a bunch of hacks for getting it. Why? They say that eating extra protein helps us build muscle, feel full, and lose weight. So is that true? We talk to kinesiology professor Stuart Phillips and nutrition professor Faidon Magkos.  Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsPROTEIN In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Protein is all the rage right now (02:53) Why protein matters (05:32) How much protein is enough? (11:33) Do you need more protein if you’re working out? (15:06) Is it risky to eat a LOT of protein? (18:46) Should you pound protein right after a workout? (23:09) Protein and weight loss This episode was produced by Rose Rimler and Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Prof. Brad Schoenfeld and Dr. Nicholas Burd. And special thanks to the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 13, 2024

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot
    Today we’re presenting Trillion Dollar Shot, a new series that explores the business story behind the rise of Ozempic and other blockbuster drugs being used for weight loss. The first episode focuses on the Novo Nordisk scientist who invented the compound that paved the way for Ozempic. You can find every episode on The Journal’s show feed. Trillion Dollar Shot is part of The Journal, which is a co-production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. This episode was hosted by Jessica Mendoza, with Bradley Olson. It was produced by Matt Kwong, with help from Jeevika Verma. Additional production from Adrienne Murray Nielsen. The series is edited by Katherine Brewer. Sound design and mixing by Peter Leonard. Mixing for Science Vs by Bobby Lord. Music in this episode by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Theme music by So Wylie, remixed for this series by Peter Leonard. Special thanks to Maria Byrne, Stefanie Ilgenfritz, Kate Linebaugh, Peter Loftus, Sara O’Brien, Enrique Perez De La Rosa, Sarah Platt, Sune Rasumssen, Jonathan Sanders, Nathan Singhapok, Leying Tang, Rolfe Winkler, Liz Essley Whyte, and Tatiana Zamis. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 11, 2024

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?
    Health care for trans kids has been in the spotlight, with battles over what the science says and tons of U.S. states restricting the care that children can get. And then there’s a new report out of the UK, called the Cass Review, saying that a bunch of the evidence that doctors have been relying on to treat trans kids is “remarkably weak.” So what’s going on here? What is the best health care for trans kids? We sort through the science with Professor Stephen Russell, Dr. Cal Horton, and Dr. Ada Cheung. UPDATE 6/6/24: In a previous version of this episode, we said a study was published this year, when it was actually published last year. The episode has been updated. Mental health resources, including suicide lifelines, for around the world: spotify.com/resources Trans Lifeline: A Trans peer support hotline: 1-877-565-8860 Trevor Project: crisis support services to LGBTQ young people: Call 1-866-488-7386 or Text ‘START’ to 678-678 Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsTransKidsCassReviewTranscript  Here are links to our previous episodes about the science of being transgender and misinformation about care for trans kids. In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over care for trans kids (02:45) What to do when a kid wants to change their name and pronouns (13:44) Do puberty blockers help trans kids’ mental health? (20:44) Does hormone therapy help trans people’s mental health? (25:25) How often are people "retransitioning"? This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang and Rose Rimler. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Eva Dasher. Consulting by Rebecca Kling. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Blake Cavve, Dr. Doug VanderLaan, and Dr. Quinnehtukqut McLamore. And a very special thanks to the trans folks and their families we talked to, Christopher Suter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 06, 2024

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup
    More than 150 years ago, just before dino-mania struck, New York City was supposed to get a majestic dinosaur museum full of amazing models of dinos. There would have been nothing like it in the world. Until a bunch of thugs showed up with sledgehammers and smashed every bit of the models to smithereens — and buried it all in Central Park. Today we’re finding out what happened — and WHY. We speak with doctoral researcher Vicky Coules and paleontologist Carl Mehling. SURVEY!! HELP US SCIENCE!! WE NEED YOUR HELP TO UNCOVER THE LAST MYSTERIES OF SEX https://bit.ly/ScienceVsSurvey Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheGreatDinosaurSmashup In this episode, we cover: (00:00) ​​The amazing dino museum we didn’t get to have (03:15) What we knew about dinos in the 1800s (04:57) The famous Crystal Palace dinosaurs (06:48) The plan for the Paleozoic Museum is born (10:40) The Great Dinosaur Smashup of 1871 (12:52) Suspect No. 1: Boss Tweed (17:58) Vicky cracks the case! (26:17) One final mystery — where are the dino pieces?? This episode was produced by Blythe Terrell with help from Wendy Zukerman, R.E. Natowicz, Michelle Dang, Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler and Joel Werner. Editing by Wendy Zukerman. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to everyone we spoke to about this episode, including Gowan Dawson, Robert Peck, Wendy Anthony and Jessica M. Lydon. Also thanks to Jack Weinstein, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 30, 2024

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?
    The Abortion Pill is now the most common way to have an abortion in the US. Yet what exactly happens when you take these pills is shrouded in mystery. Even many doctors don't know how well they work! Today, we're letting the sun shine on the abortion pill. We'll walk you through what happens when you take these pills: what they do to your body, and how safe are they for your physical and mental health? To explore all this - and more - we speak to Dr Sara Whitburn, Professor Oskari Heikinheimo, and Professor Ushma Upadhyay. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheAbortionPiill The Abortion Project's Instagram @theabortionproject Science Vs's Instagram @science_vs If you want to talk to someone - there's some great resources in here: spotify.com/resources In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over the abortion pill  (04:28) How does the abortion pill work?  (09:05) How it feels to take the abortion pill (14:34) How often do people hemorrhage? (21:22) What's "normal" bleeding?  (24:11) Does taking the abortion pill affect your mental health?  (32:02) Why some people prefer the abortion pill This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr. Tiffany Green, Dr. Ned Calonge, Professor Jenny Higgins, Dr. Daniel Aaron, Dr. Beverly Winikoff, and Dr. Abigail Aiken. Also thanks to Lauren Silverman, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 23, 2024

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?
    With the powers of the James Webb Space Telescope, scientists discovered some super weird things in the early Universe, and it's making some nerds question our theory of everything.  This story comes to us from our friends at Unexplainable at Vox Media. Find Unexplainable’s transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsUnexplainable In this episode, we cover: (0:00) Liftoff (01:10) The James Webb Space Telescope  (04:57) Party of the early universe  (08:39) Mysteries of the early galaxies  (15:23) How do we figure it out? This episode was produced by Brian Resnick, with help from Noam Hassenfeld and Meradith Hoddinott, who also manages the Unexplainable team. Editing from Jorge Just, music from Noam, and mixing and sound design from Cristian Ayala. Fact checking from Kelsey Lannin. Mandy Nguyen is searching for new forms of life. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 16, 2024

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky
    Getting your heart broken sucks — and for some of us, it even feels physically painful. So why does it hurt so bad? And what can science tell us about how to get over it? We dive into all of this with neuroscientist Prof. Lucy Brown.  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsHeartbreak In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Heartbreak sucks (07:17) What heartbreak does in the brain (12:14) What heartbreak does in the body (15:07) How to get over heartbreak  The episode does mention abuse. Here are some resources if you’re struggling to move on from abuse:  https://resources.byspotify.com/ https://www.loveisrespect.org/resources/why-am-i-struggling-to-move-on-after-abuse/ This episode was produced by Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Rose Rimler, Meryl Horn, Kaitlyn Sawrey and Lexi Krupp. Editing by Caitlin Kenney and Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly and Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, and Bobby Lord. A huge thanks to all the scientists we got in touch with for this episode, including Professor Larry Young, Professor Tiffany Field, Professor Ethan Kross, Professor Sandra Langeslag, and Professor Naomi Eisenberger. Thanks to Lori Segal. A special thanks to the Zukerman family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes
    Comedian Tig Notaro, who just released her fifth comedy special, "Hello Again," joins us for a chat about the science of her comedy: telling us how she builds jokes, and of course sharing a bunch of dumb and fabulous jokes. Enjoy!  Here's our Funniest Joke in the World Episode!!  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTigNotaro In this episode, we cover: (00:00) We're interviewing Tig!  (01:22) I could be a comedian?  (02:47) How Tig creates a joke  (08:59) The element of surprise (12:27) The world's funniest joke? (13:55) Tig's favorite jokes This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Funniest Joke in the World

    The Funniest Joke in the World
    If you Google "The Funniest Joke in the World," you'll be very disappointed. The internet might serve you something like, "What has many keys but can't open a single lock??” (Answer: A piano). Screw that. That's not funny. Enter Science Vs. We’re going on a romp to find out once and for all: What is the funniest joke in the world. According to science. And for this quest we've interviewed a bunch of amazing comics including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Dr Jason Leong, Loni Love, as well as special guest Latif Nasser of Radiolab and, of course, some scientists: Neuroscientist Professor Sophie Scott and Psychologist Professor Richard Wiseman. Which Joke Will Win???    Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsFunniestJoke In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The Quest Begins (08:40) Why laughing matters (13:13) The scientific search for the world's funniest joke (17:40) Woof, quack or moo? (21:33) The comedy K (26:30) Do different cultures have different senses of humour? (28:27) The winner! (32:15) Scientific theories of humour (lol) (38:28) Why the winning joke isn't funny (40:26) How do you stop a dog from humping your leg?  (44:43) Meet the comedy gods This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Joel Werner, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Sarah Baum. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, So Wylie, and Bobby Lord. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr Andrew Farkas, Professor Penny MacDonald, Dr Maggie Prenger and a huge thank you to Professor Chris Westbury for sharing your amazing spreadsheet!! Thanks to all the comedians we interviewed in this episode including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Loni Love, Takashi Wakasugi, Urooj Ashfaq, Dr Jason Leong, Penny Greenhalgh and Mohammed Magdi. Another big thanks to Lindsay Farber, Roland Campos, Lauren LoGiudice, Andrea Jones-Rooy and the other comics at The Joke Lab; and all the comics that we spoke to and couldn't fit into the episode, we really really appreciate you and your time! Thanks to Ben Milam, the Melbourne International Comedy Festival, Stupid Old Studios, Paige Ransbury, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Starting a Company: Mission Impossible

    Starting a Company: Mission Impossible

    Starting a company is hard, even in the best of times. But during a period of economic uncertainty, supply chain disruptions, political divisions, and a global pandemic -- it can feel impossible. In this episode, I talk to Sami Inkinen, a founder who has run companies in both bull and bear markets. Sami was the co-founder of Trulia (IPO) and now Virta Health (valued at $2B). We discuss:

    • The benefits to starting a company in a downturn
    • When to raise money, when to focus on top-line growth, and when to focus on unit economics
    • Practical tips for founder mental health
    • Making hard decisions under pressure
    • Rowing from California to Hawaii, completely unassisted


    Follow Sami Inkinen on Twitter.

    Follow host Halle Tecco on Twitter.


    Visit the Heart of Healthcare website for more.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Real Talk | 80/20 Primer

    Real Talk | 80/20 Primer

    This Real Talk is devoted to the 80/20 diet rule. It's the idea that while 80% of your diet should be from healthy whole foods, 20% can be the foods you indulge in. Anna and Luca talk about how 80/20 is a way to keep the pressure off of yourself while still living a healthy lifestyle. 
     

    Be sure to follow us on Instagram (@yourbestlifepodcast)! Also, join our official Facebook Group, “Your Best Life Podcast,” to keep the conversation going.

    Demystifying menopause

    Demystifying menopause

    Whether you're 19 and never given it a thought, or 40 and starting to wonder, menopause is an unavoidable part of life for half the population.

    But many of us are shaky on the details of what to expect — apart from hot flashes/flushes, maybe.

    Former model Ali Daddo was one of those people: totally unprepared, and caught off guard when it hit. She's on a mission to make sure other women are more informed – and therefrom more empowered – than she was.

    Just a heads up, this episode touches on mental health struggles and suicide. Please take care while listening.

    Danica Patrick's Health Journey: Hormones, Detox, and Breast Explants

    Danica Patrick's Health Journey: Hormones, Detox, and Breast Explants

    For full show notes, resources mentioned, and transcripts, go to: www.drmindypelz.com/ep138/.

    To enroll in Dr. Mindy's Fasting membership, go to: resetacademy.drmindypelz.com.

    This episode is all about how we, as women, can create an incredible customized path for our own healthcare.

    Danica Patrick is admired by millions as a trailblazer and especially as a role model for young people, women and men alike, aiming to rise to challenges and pursue their own passions.

    As a serial entrepreneur, she has launched successful ventures from apparel to wine, including her American and French labels, Somnium, a collection of fine wines grown in California’s Napa Valley, and Danica Rosé, an elegant bottling from the heart of the Provence region. Recently she debuted her new lifestyle brand VOYANT by Danica, a home scent collection utilizing the functional power of fragrance through essential oils and other natural ingredients.

    Danica Patrick continues to prove her multimedia appeal: as a television sports analyst and commentator, as the author of the self-help book Pretty Intense, and as host of her weekly Pretty Intense podcast, interviewing top athletes and celebrities. From her racing days to the present, she remains a popular personality who’s appeared in music videos and commercials, including a record-setting 14 Super Bowl commercials, and has lent her voice to videogames and cartoons such as “The Simpsons” and “South Park.” Equally recognized as a savvy businesswoman as well as a pop culture icon, Danica has landed on numerous “Favorite Female Athlete” and “Most Powerful Women” lists, including Time’s “100 Most Influential People.”

    Danica Patrick began her singular journey at a young age. As an IndyCar then NASCAR driver, she broke barriers and set records as a fierce competitor in the traditionally male-dominated world of motorsports before retiring in 2018. Danica garnered international acclaim by finishing fourth in her very first Indianapolis 500, going on to achieve another first as a female racer with her victory in the IndyCar Series Indy Japan 300 race.

    Her unique experience, perspective, and charisma make Danica Patrick a coveted speaker for a breadth of corporate, lifestyle, entertainment, and sports-related events, from motivational engagements to entrepreneur gatherings.

    Please see our medical disclaimer.