Podcast Summary
Dan's Belief in Truth and Calling Things as They Are: Dan advocates for honesty and clarity, contrasting the perceived need for safe spaces and sugarcoating among liberal groups. A student group at UC Colorado Springs wanted to ban military veterans from campus, but the university's chancellor issued a statement in support of veterans, clarifying Dan's stance.
During The Dan Bongino Show, Dan expressed his belief in delivering the truth and calling things as they are, contrasting the perceived need for safe spaces and lollipops among liberal groups. He also discussed a controversial student group at the University of Colorado, Colorado Springs, who wanted to ban military veterans from campus. The university's chancellor issued a statement in support of veterans, but it was from the group, not the university itself. Dan clarified that he was not disparaging the university and encouraged listeners to check out the statement on his Facebook page, Twitter, or show notes. Additionally, Dan shared his thoughts on the ongoing tragedies, such as the situation in Texas, which serve as a reminder of real-life struggles and challenges compared to everyday concerns.
Perspective is key in overcoming challenges: Fear and misunderstanding can cloud our judgment, but maintaining a sense of humor and keeping things in perspective can help us overcome challenges
Perspective is crucial in dealing with challenges. Joe shared his fear of blood tests due to past experiences, but then reminded himself to put things in perspective when he heard about the struggles of people affected by natural disasters. The media was also discussed as a source of misunderstanding, as an example of Melania Trump's choice of footwear during a visit to a flood zone was taken out of context and criticized without proper analysis. Overall, the conversation emphasized the importance of maintaining a sense of humor and keeping things in perspective, especially during difficult times.
Media's inconsistent application of rules in public discourse: Media's selective application of rules based on political affiliation erodes public trust and credibility
The media's inconsistent application of rules in public discourse, particularly when it comes to criticizing political figures, is a major contributor to the erosion of their credibility with the American people. The speaker argues that there were once unspoken rules against criticizing the First Lady's attire or the actions of past presidents, but these rules are now selectively applied based on political affiliation. This inconsistency is labeled as "what aboutism" by the media when conservatives bring up past actions or decisions that they believe should be criticized, but were previously ignored. The speaker calls for clarity on the rules of public discourse and criticizes the media for engaging in whataboutism themselves, only applying the rules when it suits their political narrative. This inconsistency undermines the media's credibility and makes it difficult for the public to trust their reporting.
Trust in Major News Outlets Low Among Trump Supporters: Only 12% and 14% of Trump supporters consider the New York Times and Washington Post trustworthy, respectively. Misreporting incidents like the McGregor-Mayweather fight erode public trust further.
The credibility of major news outlets like the New York Times and Washington Post is at an all-time low among a significant portion of the population, particularly Trump supporters. Only 12% and 14% of them, respectively, consider these publications trustworthy. This is a major concern for the media industry, as trust and facts are the foundation of journalism. The media's inability to regain this trust could lead to significant financial and moral losses. An example of this issue is the New York Times' coverage of Conor McGregor's fight with Floyd Mayweather, where they reported McGregor as being badly beaten up when he was not. This misreporting further erodes the public's trust in the media.
Culture war being lost by left in various sectors: Decreasing trust in newspapers, declining ticket sales, and decreased NFL viewership indicate market's rejection of left's credibility. Alienation of half the country and coverage of terror group Antifa fuels backlash
The culture war between the left and right in America is being lost by the left in various sectors such as academia, Hollywood, and the media. This is evident in decreasing trust in newspapers like the New York Times, declining ticket sales in Hollywood, and decreased NFL viewership. The market is already deciding who is credible, and the left is alienating half the country. Furthermore, Antifa, a political terror group, is being given coverage as if it's an activist group. The backlash against these entities is significant, and the left needs to address this trend if they hope to win the political war.
Longer leg-to-arm ratio makes deadlifting harder, but creatine supplements can help: Using creatine supplements can enhance gym performance and improve muscle volumization, making deadlifting with a longer leg-to-arm ratio more manageable. Meanwhile, the lack of law enforcement action against Antifa during violent protests is a concerning issue, allowing them to suppress free speech under the guise of potential violence.
Having a longer leg-to-arm ratio can make deadlifting more challenging due to the need to lift the weight higher. However, the use of a supplement like Foundation, a creatine ATP blend, can enhance gym performance and improve muscle volumization, leading to better results. On a different note, the lack of action from law enforcement against Antifa during their violent protests is a concerning issue. This "hecklers veto" allows Antifa to suppress free speech under the guise of potential violence, creating a dangerous situation for a free society.
Media's role in reporting on violence and selective coverage: The media's selective coverage of violent incidents can condone further conflict and it's crucial to address this issue before it escalates.
Free speech is a fundamental right in a free society, protecting the minority position and not just the popular opinion. However, the media's role in reporting on incidents of violence and their selective coverage of certain events can be concerning. The left's use of violence as a political weapon against conservative ideas is escalating, leading to potential self-defense situations. The media's lack of coverage and failure to label these incidents as political terrorism only condones the violence and sets the stage for further conflict. It's crucial to address this issue before it escalates into a more significant problem.
Cancelling Domains and Finances Based on Political Beliefs: Individuals should withdraw financial support from companies and entities that cancel domains or financially support individuals based on political beliefs, and encourage open conversations instead of emotional reactions.
The cancellation of domains and financial support for individuals and organizations based on political beliefs is a concerning trend that can lead to a marginalized class of people and potential violence. The speaker suggests that individuals should "speak with their wallets" and stop supporting companies and entities that engage in such practices. The case of two law professors who wrote about the breakdown of traditional American values and faced criticism for their views towards minority communities illustrates the need for rational conversation rather than emotional reactions. The speaker encourages open and honest discussions about how to handle these situations and urges individuals to take action by withdrawing financial support.
The debate over racial disparities and poverty in America: Despite historical injustices, progress was made in reducing racial gaps from 1890s to 1970s. Focusing on family values and cultural norms can help reduce poverty and disparities.
The ongoing debate around racial disparities and poverty in America has become a politically charged issue, with some arguing that it's a remnant of slavery, while others believe that the breakdown of traditional family values and cultural norms is a significant contributing factor. Two law professors have recently come under fire for their views, which some have labeled as racist and white supremacist discourse. However, Jason Riley, a black conservative commentator, argues that progress was being made in reducing racial gaps between the 1890s and the 1970s, despite the existence of Jim Crow laws and segregation. He emphasizes that the black family was doing better than the white family during that period, with higher marriage rates, labor participation, income growth, and poverty reduction. Therefore, reducing poverty and addressing disparities requires a focus on strengthening families and promoting cultural values, rather than solely blaming historical injustices.
The left maintains a victim class through blame and dependency: The left's narrative thrives on keeping people angry and dependent, preventing self-determination and improvement, and blaming external factors for societal issues.
The left relies on keeping people angry and blaming external factors for their problems in order to maintain a victim class and perpetuate their narrative. According to the authors of a recent piece in UPan and University of San Diego, the disintegration of the family is a major contributor to increased crime, poor economic and academic output, and a lack of commitment to hard work. The left does not want individuals to take responsibility for their lives and make decisions that lead to self-determination and improvement. Instead, they encourage a mindset of blame and dependency on the government for solutions. This individualization of the problem makes it impossible to create a victim class and goes against the left's narrative. The authors are currently facing backlash for their ideas, as the left cannot accept the notion that individuals have the power to change their circumstances. The speaker, who has personal experience with the effects of generational poverty and crime, emphasizes the importance of recognizing that the system is incentivizing individuals to make bad decisions and that there is a solution beyond blame and victimhood.
Government welfare keeps people in poverty: Speaker argues gov't welfare discourages work, encourages poverty, and promotes CRTV for conservative content at lower cost, supports Trump's tax cut for small businesses, and upcoming book on Secret Service failures
The speaker believes that government welfare programs are inadvertently keeping people in poverty by incentivizing them not to work. He argues that by reducing government intervention and allowing individuals to handle their own situations, they will be able to work and improve their lives. The speaker also promotes CRTV as a source for conservative content at a lower cost than cable TV, and mentions the upcoming release of his book, "Protecting the President," which focuses on the downfall of the Secret Service and the importance of learning from past mistakes. Additionally, the speaker supports Trump's proposed tax cut for pass-through businesses, which he believes will benefit small businesses and stimulate economic growth.
The Impact of Money on the Economy: Frivolous lawsuits can drain resources from businesses, and it's essential to consider the bigger picture when using money.
Money, whether earned or saved, has the potential to make a significant impact on the economy. It can be invested, spent, or consumed, and it's important to consider how it will be used. However, the legal system can also be a drain on resources, with frivolous lawsuits costing businesses a substantial amount of time and money. The Subway footlong lawsuit is an example of this waste, with lawyers earning settlements that could have instead benefited American businesses. Ultimately, it's essential to consider the bigger picture and prioritize how our resources are used. As Dan Bongino emphasized, every review on iTunes helps, and your support is greatly appreciated.
