Podcast Summary
Irony of Armed Security at Anti-Gun Rally: Organizers hired an armed security team for an anti-gun rally, while Dan Bongino defends 2nd Amendment rights and promotes gun accuracy products
Hypocrisy was on full display during a recent anti-gun rally in DC, where organizers reached out to a former friend of Dan Bongino's to provide armed security. The irony of this situation was not lost on Bongino, who passionately defends the Second Amendment rights of others while also acknowledging the importance of accuracy and proficiency with firearms. Meanwhile, Bongino shared articles suggesting that the Obama team spied on the Trump team due to their efforts to hide something. He also promoted a product called iTarget, which helps shooters improve their accuracy through laser rounds and targets. The Dan Bongino Show is dedicated to sharing the truth about America and tackling important issues with a stacked lineup of guests and topics.
Improving shooting accuracy and investigating government corruption: The iTargetPro.com platform enhances shooting skills, while John Solomon's report exposes government corruption and the need for accountability in investigations.
The iTargetPro.com platform is an effective tool for improving shooting accuracy with your firearm, allowing for consistent practice and development of trigger control, sight alignment, and proficiency. The discussion also touched upon the investigative piece by John Solomon in The Hill, which revealed the extent of the Obama administration's spying on the Trump campaign and the corrupt dealings they were trying to hide. The involvement of Mueller in the uranium one investigation and his former chief of staff's role in the Department of Justice further highlights the need for transparency and accountability in government surveillance and investigations. Overall, the importance of accuracy in shooting and the implications of government corruption were the main themes of the conversation.
Allegations of illicit dealings between US, Russia, and Iran during Obama administration: During Obama's tenure, an informant exposed Russian involvement in Uranium One and Moscow Iran deals, but the Obama team reportedly placed a gag order on him before the statute of limitations expired. This raises questions about their motivations for focusing on Russian collusion during Trump's presidency.
During the Obama administration, there were allegations of illicit dealings involving the United States, Russia, and Iran in relation to their nuclear programs. An FBI informant, who was paid $50,000, provided evidence of these dealings, including the use of channels for money laundering and influence peddling in the Uranium One deal and the Moscow Iran deal. The Obama team reportedly needed Russian involvement in the Iran deal due to their assistance in building Iran's nuclear program. When the informant's information came to light, the Obama administration allegedly placed a gag order on him just before the statute of limitations expired. Now, with the informant recently released from his non-disclosure agreement, he is speaking out about what he knows, revealing potentially devastating connections. It is important to note that this is an independent journalist's report, and while the facts presented are not in dispute, the interpretation and implications of those facts are subject to debate. The FBI director during this time was Robert Mueller, who later led the investigation into Russian collusion with the Trump campaign. This information raises questions about the motivations behind the intense focus on Russian collusion during the Trump presidency, as opposed to the Obama administration's potential involvement in these deals.
Russia's assistance to Iran's nuclear program during Obama's term: Evidence of Russia's involvement in Iran's nuclear program during Obama's term was ignored, leading to criticism of the Obama administration's support of Iran's nuclear development and subsequent Iran deal.
During President Obama's first term, evidence was presented to the FBI indicating that Russia was assisting Iran's nuclear program, despite billions of dollars in business deals between the U.S. and Russia's uranium industry. An informant, William Douglas Campbell, provided evidence of intercepted inspection reports and equipment advice being sent to a nuclear facility in Iran. Russian nuclear executives were also reportedly concerned about the potential backlash from their assistance to Iran's nuclear program. The Obama administration's support of Iran's nuclear development program and the subsequent Iran deal have been criticized as an anti-Israel rebalancing of power towards Iran's enemies. The FBI's handling of this information and the subsequent investigation into the Trump team's alleged ties to Russia has been questioned, with suggestions of a setup to discredit the Trump administration due to their lack of criminal or political connections to Russia. The revelation of another attempt to entrap the Trump team with information related to Russian connections further adds to these concerns.
Thrive Market's Discounted Non-GMO Products vs Amazon: Thrive Market provides high-quality, non-GMO products at discounted prices, offering new customers $60 in free organic groceries, free shipping, and a 30-day trial. In contrast, foreign policy expert Stefan Halper contacted Trump campaign members, raising suspicions due to his random and unusual inquiries.
Thrive Market offers high-quality, non-GMO products at significantly discounted prices compared to traditional retailers and even online marketplaces like Amazon. Thrive Market specializes in selling exclusively non-GMO products and even offers a selection that cannot be found on Amazon. They offer a deal of $60 in free organic groceries, free shipping, and a 30-day trial for new customers. Stefan Halper, a foreign policy expert with connections to the CIA and MI6, contacted several members of the Trump campaign, including George Papadopoulos and Carter Page, before the election. Halper's motives for contacting the campaign members are still unclear, but his inquiries raised suspicions due to the randomness and the nature of the questions he asked during their meetings.
Approaches to Trump team by individuals with intelligence ties: During the 2016 campaign, individuals with alleged ties to Russian intelligence and the CIA approached members of the Trump team, including Carter Page and George Papadopoulos, raising questions about potential entrapment and political motivations.
During the 2016 presidential campaign, multiple individuals connected to the Trump team were approached by various people, including a professor named Halper, who had alleged ties to Russian intelligence and the CIA. Halper had invited Carter Page to attend a symposium at Cambridge University, and later contacted both Page and George Papadopoulos about Russian relations. Halper's late father-in-law, Ray Klein, had also served as the director of the CIA's Bureau of Intelligence and Research and was the agency's top analyst during the Cuban Missile Crisis. Halper had also reportedly managed a team of former CIA analysts in Virginia. The repeated attempts by these individuals to contact the Trump campaign, along with their connections to American intelligence agencies and the Obama administration, have raised questions about potential entrapment and political motivations.
A complex web of connections between intelligence agencies, conservative and liberal groups, and individuals: The Trump-Russia dossier's origins involved British intelligence, the CIA, and both the Clinton campaign and a conservative outlet, with a British intelligence officer at the center of the story.
The origins of the Trump-Russia dossier involve a complex web of connections between conservative and liberal groups, intelligence agencies, and individuals. The initial contract for the dossier was with a conservative outlet, the Washington Free Beacon, but the funding continued after the contract was taken over by the Hillary Clinton campaign. A key figure in this story is a British intelligence officer, Stefan Halper, who is connected to both MI6 and the CIA, and who was also friends with a former MI6 head, Sir Richard Dearlove. Halper's connections to the intelligence community, as well as his interactions with Trump campaign advisor Carter Page, raise questions about the motivations behind the dossier and the timing of certain events. Additionally, there are indications that British intelligence may have been involved in the spying on the Trump team, and the transfer of the Fusion GPS contract from the Washington Free Beacon to the Clinton campaign coincided with meetings between Christopher Steele and Stefan Halper. The evidence suggests a swampy operation involving entrenched intelligence community members and the top ranks of the FBI to set up the Trump team.
Obama Team's Alleged Collaboration with British Intelligence to Investigate Trump Campaign: The Obama team is suspected of collaborating with British intelligence to investigate the Trump campaign, potentially abusing resources and creating a false narrative of collusion with Russia.
There were allegations of international collaboration between the Obama team and their British counterparts to investigate the Trump campaign, leading to potential abuse of intelligence and counterintelligence resources. George Papadopoulos, a Trump campaign advisor, was reportedly approached by British intelligence officer, Azra Turk, and professor Stefan Halper, who had connections to both the Obama administration and MI6. These meetings took place in London, and Halper's contact with Papadopoulos occurred around the same time he was working on the infamous Trump dossier with Christopher Steele. Halper's motivations for reaching out to the Trump campaign and the nature of their discussions remain unclear, but it is believed that the Obama team may have been trying to create a narrative of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. This investigation eventually led to the counterintelligence probe into the Trump campaign, which some argue was an abuse of power. The extent of this international collaboration and its impact on the Trump campaign is still being unraveled, but it raises serious concerns about the actions of the Obama administration and their British partners.
Creative HVAC Ad Compares System Cleaning to Trump's Anti-Corruption Efforts: FilterBuy's ad effectively compared HVAC system cleaning to Trump's anti-corruption efforts, reminding viewers to maintain their systems for efficiency and cost savings. Old news reports on Obama's spying on Trump should be understood in context of available information at the time.
During a discussion on the news, the host highlighted an ad from FilterBuy, a company that provides HVAC filters. The ad compared the process of cleaning an HVAC system to President Trump's efforts to clean out corrupt officials. The host praised the ad's creativity and effectiveness. He also mentioned that people should not procrastinate on cleaning their HVAC systems to avoid inefficiency and high costs. Additionally, the host addressed concerns about why left-leaning media outlets reported on Obama spying on Trump at the time, explaining that these reports were likely based on information available at the time, even if the full scandal was not yet known. Overall, the discussion showcased the creativity of the FilterBuy ad and addressed common questions about the news coverage of the Trump-Russia investigation.
Media heavily misled about Trump-Russia collusion: Media spread false information about Trump-Russia collusion, leading to a scandal over Obama administration's spying on Trump team based on non-existent crime.
During the 2016 election, the media, particularly CNN, were heavily misled into believing that there was collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia to win the election. They reported on this extensively, citing evidence from British intelligence and wiretaps. However, the collusion never materialized, leaving CNN and other outlets with a major scandal: the Obama administration's spying on the Trump team based on a non-existent crime. The media's attempts to cover for this and move on have been met with resistance, as evidence of their earlier reporting remains online. Jordan Peterson, a guest on Tucker Carlson's show, explained that the left is not perceived as frightening or ostracized in the same way as the right because they use language and tactics that allow them to avoid accountability and maintain a veneer of morality. The labels "left" and "right" are arbitrary, and it's important to critically examine the motivations and actions of all political actors.
Recognizing Dangerous Ideologies on the Left: While condemning hateful ideologies on the right, it's equally important to address harmful ideas on the left, such as socialism and equality of outcome, which can also cause harm through media, academia, and Hollywood.
While it may be easier to identify and condemn overtly hateful ideologies like white supremacy, it's important to recognize that dangerous ideologies can also exist on the left, such as socialism and advocacy for equality of outcome. The right tends to police itself and expel those with anti-conservative values, whereas the left allows harmful ideas to flourish in media, academia, and Hollywood due to the more palatable language used to promote them. It's crucial to acknowledge the potential harm of all extremist ideologies and work towards promoting individual liberty, freedom, and equality of opportunity for all.
The Right and Left's Approach to Extremist Elements: The right actively polices its own and does not provide a safe haven for hateful or destructive ideologies, while the left does not adequately address the presence of such elements within its ranks, potentially allowing for the propagation and acceptance of dangerous ideas, with consequences as severe as those seen in Venezuela.
While both the right and left political ideologies have extremist elements, the difference lies in how each side addresses and marginalizes them. The right, according to the speaker, actively polices its own and does not provide a safe haven for hateful or destructive ideologies. In contrast, the left, as per the speaker's perspective, does not adequately address the presence of such elements within its ranks. The speaker uses the example of socialism and its destructive outcomes in Venezuela to illustrate this point, emphasizing that the left's failure to address these issues allows for the propagation and acceptance of dangerous ideas. The speaker concludes by warning about the deadly consequences of such ideologies and the importance of holding all political ideologies accountable for the actions of their extremist elements.
The Growing Size of the Federal Bureaucracy: The federal bureaucracy is expanding rapidly, necessitating urgent solutions for control. Tune in tonight on NRA TV for more insights.
The federal bureaucracy is growing at an alarming rate, as discussed in today's Wall Street Journal. The article highlights the mammoth size of the federal bureaucracy and the need for solutions to bring it under control. The speaker plans to delve deeper into this topic tomorrow, providing more lengthy and detailed information. In the meantime, tune in to the speaker's show tonight on NRA TV at 530 PM for more insightful discussions. The speaker values the audience's time and promises to provide valuable content every night from his home studio.
