Podcast Summary
Elites and corporations planning to use AI and other tech to embed left-wing values in society: The world's billionaires are using AI and corporate power to gradually shift society towards left-wing values, through technologies like social credit scores and central bank digital currencies.
The world's billionaires, through the use of artificial intelligence and the power of corporations, are working to control our lives, change our values, and transform society as part of a plan called the great reset. This is not a conspiracy theory, but a very real and terrifying reality. Justin Haskins, in his new book "Dark Future Uncovering the Great Reset's Terrifying Next Phase," co-written with Glenn Beck, reveals that the elites and big corporations are planning to use emerging technologies like artificial intelligence, central bank digital currencies, and social credit scores to embed left-wing values into these technologies, leading to a shift towards left-wing values in the future. This transformation will be gradual and most people may not even realize it's happening. The book also covers topics such as mass surveillance, mass data collection, and the impact of the war in Ukraine on these plans. It's important for us to understand these plans and how we can push back against them.
The Great Reset: Creating a Global Cohesive Society: The Great Reset, driven by the WEF and elites, aims to create a global society with same rules, addressing climate change, inequality, and racism, primarily through financial system and corporations.
The Great Reset, led by the World Economic Forum and other powerful elites, aims to create a global cohesive society ruled by the same rules, eliminating individual national or community interests. They present this as a means to address issues like climate change, inequality, and racism. The transformation is being driven primarily through the financial system and corporations, which are being encouraged to prioritize products and services that align with the Great Reset agenda, rather than consumer demand. This shift is evident in various sectors, including culture and media, and is being used to change societal norms and behaviors.
ESG scores influencing corporate policies for financial gains: Corporations prioritize ESG policies to secure high scores, impacting bond ratings, access to capital, and societal transformation
Corporations are being pressured to adopt certain social and environmental policies not to please their consumers, but to secure high Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores. These scores are crucial for approval from shareholders and access to capital through the financial system. The calculation of ESG scores is largely driven by influential firms like the World Economic Forum and Moody's Investor Service. These firms' ESG scoring systems can impact a company's bond ratings, which in turn affect their ability to raise capital. The ultimate goal is to transform society and make it look the same culturally and structurally, with the private sector leading the charge instead of governments. This transformation is being facilitated through the financial system and the massive amounts of money printing that have occurred over the past decade.
ESG Movement's Impact on Business and Finance: ESG is influencing business and finance with corporations producing reports and dedicated departments, investment firms and banks using scores to determine business relationships, and governments driving expansion through regulations.
The Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) movement is becoming increasingly influential in business and finance, with corporations producing annual reports and entire departments dedicated to improving their ESG scores. Wall Street investment firms, banks, and even governments are using these scores to determine who they will do business with, creating a powerful incentive for companies to prioritize ESG initiatives. The expansion of this system is driven by various players, including central banks, private banks, and European regulatory bodies. While nearly all large corporations are engaging with ESG, some companies are more progressive than others, and the degree to which they prioritize ESG initiatives depends on the pressure exerted by ESG investors. For instance, BlackRock and other large investment firms have the power to significantly impact companies' ESG performance through share ownership and pressure tactics. Ultimately, the ESG movement is reshaping business practices and societal values, with corporations striving to meet ESG standards to secure investor support, maintain banking relationships, and comply with regulatory requirements.
ESG reports and scores drive societal change: Companies with good ESG scores are partially committed, while those with mediocre or bad scores are under pressure to transform, shaping societal change through various industries like media, education, and entertainment.
Companies with mediocre or bad Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) scores are being pushed to transform more, while those with good scores are only partially committed, because the important companies are the ones driving significant societal change. The ESG reports and scores are not just about evaluating a company's impact on the environment or society, but also about enforcing certain ideologies and values. For instance, Facebook was criticized for not censoring enough and was pressured to remove controversial figures like Donald Trump from their platform. The financial institutions and corporations are trying to balance their profits with societal transformation, and the transformation is being driven by various industries like media, education, and entertainment. The companies are being tested and sometimes push boundaries, but are being encouraged to keep going despite any backlash from consumers.
Corporations' actions influenced by financial gain and ideology: Corporations prioritize financial gain and ideology over human rights, seeking government subsidies and bailouts, and doing business with countries that violate human rights.
The pushback against corporate actions may have an impact, but the ultimate goal for many of these entities is not solely centered around consumers or progressive values. They are playing a long game, seeking government subsidies and massive bailouts, and are willing to do business with countries that violate human rights. Their actions cannot be solely attributed to compassion or diversity, but rather a combination of financial gain and ideological bent. The tight connection between these corporations, banks, and China, despite China's human rights violations, further supports this notion.
Power struggle in US: Ideology vs. Corruption and Transformation: The left's strategy for societal change involves using financial institutions and government to control the economy, making it difficult for alternative companies to function. However, regulatory measures can ensure financial institutions offer services based on financial considerations rather than political ones.
The ongoing power struggle between different political ideologies in the United States is not just about ideology, but also about corruption, money, and transforming society. The left's strategy for societal change involves using financial institutions and government to control the economy, making it difficult for alternative companies to function. This tactic relies on banks, payment processors, and tech companies refusing to do business with those who don't align with their values. However, there is hope for change through regulatory measures that would require financial institutions to offer services based on financial considerations rather than political ones. Florida has already passed such a law, and similar bills are proposed in Congress. If Republicans gain control of Congress and the White House, they may pass a bill to stop this form of discrimination. Overall, the ongoing economic battle is about more than just ideology; it's about ensuring fairness and equality in the financial sector.
Power struggle between elites and public over ESG practices: Republicans and Democrats have contrasting views on ESG practices, with Republicans generally opposing them due to potential denial of banking services, while Democrats are divided, and progress is made in areas with strong Republican opposition
The concentration of power and wealth in the hands of the elite through ESG (Environmental, Social, and Governance) practices is a contentious issue, with both Republicans and Democrats having differing perspectives. Establishment Republicans, particularly those in positions of leadership, have been the most effective in stopping these practices, which can deny access to banking services based on personal choices. Democrats, on the other hand, have a divided stance, with some opposing these practices and others promoting free market economics, while the socialist wing of the party is against corporate and financial institution control of society. The most progress has been made in places where Republican leadership has taken a firm stance against ESG, such as Florida. The issue ultimately boils down to a power struggle between elites and the general public.
Republican Politicians Blocking ESG Regulations: Establishment Republicans, like Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham, obstruct ESG reforms due to business influence. Potential GOP candidates, such as Ron DeSantis, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Donald Trump, have criticized ESG and may push for regulations.
Establishment Republican politicians, including figures like Mitch McConnell and Lindsey Graham, are the primary obstacles to regulating ESG practices in the financial industry. They have been influenced by big business and special interests, making it difficult to pass necessary reforms. Some potential Republican presidential candidates who have expressed opposition to ESG include Ron DeSantis, Vivek Ramaswamy, and Donald Trump. DeSantis' actions in Florida demonstrate his tough stance on ESG, while Vivek Ramaswamy has also criticized ESG practices, particularly in the financial sector. The Trump administration attempted to regulate ESG practices through the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency before Joe Biden took office and repealed the regulation. These candidates and past actions offer hope for addressing the issue of ESG in the financial industry.
Presidential Candidates Addressing Technological Singularity Risks: Vivek Ramaswamy, Ron DeSantis, and Donald Trump are the candidates addressing technological singularity risks, while the UN and WEF have plans that could lead to 'world domination' through AI.
Vivek Ramaswamy, Ron DeSantis, and Donald Trump are the presidential candidates who have shown the strongest commitment to addressing the issue of technological singularity and its potential risks. The UN and WEF have plans that could lead to "world domination," and artificial intelligence plays a significant role in these plans. It's crucial for us to understand the bigger picture behind the social, cultural, moral, and legal changes we're seeing, and tomorrow's conversation will delve deeper into this topic, promising to be fascinating, mind-blowing, and full of optimism and hope.
