Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • The Simpsons: A Reflection of the Changing American DreamThe Simpsons, once symbolizing the American middle class dream, now offer a unique perspective on how the economy and the American dream have evolved, despite their unchanged portrayal.

      The Simpsons family, a fictional representation from a long-running animated television show, has come to symbolize the American middle class dream. The idea of a family with a high school educated breadwinner, working a union job, and owning a house in the suburbs, was once considered aspirational, but now seems out of reach for many. The Simpsons, who have remained relatively unchanged since their debut in 1989, offer a unique perspective on how the American dream and economy have evolved over the past three decades. The writers of The Simpsons even acknowledged this in a recent episode, which was inspired by an NPR Planet Money podcast episode about the topic. The show's portrayal of an economically stable middle class life may no longer reflect reality, but it continues to resonate with audiences as a reminder of what once was and a reminder of the economic challenges many Americans still face.

    • The Simpsons reflect the changing American dream and economic landscapeThe Simpsons showcase the shift from stable jobs and home ownership to a more uncertain economic reality, highlighting the evolving American dream and economic trends

      The Simpsons, an iconic American television show, serve as a reflection of the evolving American dream and the economic changes that have occurred over the past few decades. The show's depiction of a middle-class family with financial struggles resonated with many viewers, as it mirrored their own experiences. However, as Al Jean, a longtime executive producer and writer of The Simpsons, points out, the economic landscape has shifted significantly since the show's inception. The jobs that once provided stable income and benefits, such as Homer's job at the nuclear power plant, are now less common. The American dream, once synonymous with home ownership, a steady job, and a good education for one's children, now looks very different. This economic evolution is subtle day to day but seismic in its impact. By examining the Simpsons and the economic realities they depict, we can gain a deeper understanding of how the American dream has changed and the economic trends shaping our world today.

    • A magical singing janitor takes Bart back in time to understand Homer's pastThe American dream of maintaining a middle-class lifestyle may be unattainable due to economic changes like the decline of manufacturing jobs and the increasing need for education and college degrees.

      The Simpsons episode "Poor Heist Rock" explores the American dream and the changing economic landscape through the character of Homer. The episode features a musical journey led by a magical singing janitor, played by Hugh Jackman, who takes Bart back in time to understand how his father managed to maintain a middle-class lifestyle. However, the episode also highlights how Homer's lack of education and skills would make it difficult for him to secure the same job in today's economy. In 1989, about 16% of jobs in the US were manufacturing jobs, but today it is just over 8%. Furthermore, many jobs that require a college degree and paying student loans can leave people in poverty. Homer's dream of replicating his father's middle-class life may not be achievable due to these economic changes. The episode provides a humorous yet insightful commentary on the American dream and the challenges of maintaining a middle-class lifestyle in today's economy.

    • Homer's income no longer enough for average AmericanIn 1996, Homer's income of $25,000 was enough for a median-priced home, but today, that same income is not enough for the $430,000 median home price, revealing the economic disparity between past and present and the challenges faced by the average American.

      The economic circumstances of Homer Simpson, and by extension the average American, have significantly changed since the show's inception in 1989. A key episode from 1996 reveals Homer's annual income to be around $25,000, which was roughly equivalent to $50,000 in today's dollars. However, this salary is no longer sufficient for the average American to afford a median-priced home, which has seen a dramatic increase from $125,000 in 1989 to around $430,000 in 2022. This means that Homer, and potentially other Americans, would have to significantly reduce their economic expectations and make difficult choices between necessities like healthcare and rent. The situation is further complicated by the fact that Homer is currently unemployed and Bart's economic prospects are uncertain. Overall, the discussion highlights the increasing economic disparity between past and present, and the challenges faced by the average American in today's economy.

    • Middle Class Shrinking, American Dream at RiskThe middle class has shrunk, the rich have gained, and the American dream of better opportunities for each generation is at risk due to factors like union decline, corporate greed, Wall Street malfeasance, and short-sighted politics.

      The middle class has shrunk over the past 30 years, with approximately 6% fewer families considered middle class today compared to 1990. The Simpsons, for example, who were once solidly middle-class, now fall into the low-income category. While the rich have seen significant income growth, this trend doesn't necessarily address the core of the American dream question. Instead, the American dream hinges on the belief that each generation should have better opportunities and a higher standard of living than the one before. Factors contributing to the decline of the middle class include the decline of unions, rampant corporate greed, Wall Street malfeasance, and short-sighted politics. Despite these challenges, there are still new opportunities for wealth creation, particularly in industries like tech. However, the income gap between the rich and the middle class continues to widen, making it increasingly difficult for many families to achieve the American dream.

    • Maintaining the Comedy of The Simpsons Despite Economic ChallengesThe Simpsons creators keep the comedy intact despite economic hardships, inspiring entrepreneurship in viewers, with economist Robert Reich's influence and belief in suspension of disbelief.

      Despite the economic challenges faced by the Simpson family, the creators have no plans to make their lifestyle more economically realistic for fear of turning the comedy into tragedy. The unemployment rate may be lower now than it was 30 years ago, but the reality for many people, including Homer and Bart Simpson, is still bleak. However, there's a silver lining as there's a record number of people starting businesses, offering opportunities for entrepreneurship. Economist Robert Reich, who has influenced the show, did review the script and made no changes, indicating some level of inspiration and factual basis. Ultimately, the show's creators believe in the power of suspension of disbelief and maintaining the comedy without delving into the tragic.

    Recent Episodes from Planet Money

    Do immigrants really take jobs and lower wages?

    Do immigrants really take jobs and lower wages?
    We wade into the heated debate over immigrants' impact on the labor market. When the number of workers in a city increases, does that take away jobs from the people who already live and work there? Does a surge of immigration hurt their wages?

    The debate within the field of economics often centers on Nobel-prize winner David Card's ground-breaking paper, "The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market." Today on the show: the fight over that paper, and what it tells us about the debate over immigration.

    More Listening:
    - When The Boats Arrive
    - The Men on the Roof

    This episode was hosted by Amanda Aronczyk and Jeff Guo. It was produced by Willa Rubin, edited by Annie Brown, and engineered by Valentina Rodríguez Sánchez. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Planet Money
    enJune 29, 2024

    The Carriage Tax (Update)

    The Carriage Tax (Update)
    (Note: A version of this episode originally ran in 2019.)

    In 1794, George Washington decided to raise money for the federal government by taxing the rich. He did it by putting a tax on horse-drawn carriages.

    The carriage tax could be considered the first federal wealth tax of the United States. It led to a huge fight over the power to tax in the U.S. Constitution, a fight that continues today.

    Listen back to our 2019 episode: "Could A Wealth Tax Work?"

    Listen to The Indicator's 2023 episode: "Could SCOTUS outlaw wealth taxes?"

    This episode was hosted by Greg Rosalsky and Bryant Urstadt. It was originally produced by Nick Fountain and Liza Yeager, with help from Sarah Gonzalez. Today's update was produced by Willa Rubin and edited by Molly Messick and our executive producer, Alex Goldmark.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 26, 2024

    The Vapes of Wrath

    The Vapes of Wrath
    When the vape brand Juul first hit the market back in 2015, e-cigarettes were in a kind of regulatory limbo. At the time, the rules that governed tobacco cigarettes did not explicitly apply to e-cigarettes. Then Juul blew up, fueled a public health crisis over teen vaping, and inspired a regulatory crackdown. But when the government finally stepped in to solve the problem of youth vaping, it may have actually made things worse.

    Today's episode is a collaboration with the new podcast series "Backfired: the Vaping Wars." You can listen to the full series at audible.com/Backfired.

    This episode was hosted by Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi and Leon Neyfakh. It was produced by Emma Peaslee and edited by Jess Jiang with help from Annie Brown. It was fact checked by Sofia Shchukina and engineered by Cena Loffredo. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 21, 2024

    Why is everyone talking about Musk's money?

    Why is everyone talking about Musk's money?
    We've lived amongst Elon Musk headlines for so long now that it's easy to forget just how much he sounds like a sci-fi character. He runs a space company and wants to colonize mars. He also runs a company that just implanted a computer chip into a human brain. And he believes there's a pretty high probability everything is a simulation and we are living inside of it.

    But the latest Elon Musk headline-grabbing drama is less something out of sci-fi, and more something pulled from HBO's "Succession."

    Elon Musk helped take Tesla from the brink of bankruptcy to one of the biggest companies in the world. And his compensation for that was an unprecedentedly large pay package that turned him into the richest person on Earth. But a judge made a decision about that pay package that set off a chain of events resulting in quite possibly the most expensive, highest stakes vote in publicly traded company history.

    The ensuing battle over Musk's compensation is not just another wild Elon tale. It's a lesson in how to motivate the people running the biggest companies that – like it or not – are shaping our world. It's a classic economics problem with a very 2024 twist.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 19, 2024

    What's with all the tiny soda cans? And other grocery store mysteries, solved.

    What's with all the tiny soda cans? And other grocery store mysteries, solved.
    There's a behind the scenes industry that helps big brands decide questions like: How big should a bag of chips be? What's the right size for a bottle of shampoo? And yes, also: When should a company do a little shrinkflation?

    From Cookie Monster to President Biden, everybody is complaining about shrinkflation these days. But when we asked the packaging and pricing experts, they told us that shrinkflation is just one move in a much larger, much weirder 4-D chess game.

    The name of that game is "price pack architecture." This is the idea that you shouldn't just sell your product in one or two sizes. You should sell your product in a whole range of different sizes, at a whole range of different price points. Over the past 15 years, price pack architecture has completely changed how products are marketed and sold in the United States.

    Today, we are going on a shopping cart ride-along with one of those price pack architects. She's going to pull back the curtain and show us why some products are getting larger while others are getting smaller, and tell us about the adorable little soda can that started it all.

    By the end of the episode, you'll never look at a grocery store the same way again.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 14, 2024

    Bringing a tariff to a graphite fight

    Bringing a tariff to a graphite fight
    Graphite is sort of the one-hit wonder of minerals. And that hit? Pencils. Everyone loves to talk about pencils when it comes to graphite. If graphite were to perform a concert, they'd close out the show with "pencils," and everyone would clap and cheer. But true fans of graphite would be shouting out "batteries!" Because graphite is a key ingredient in another important thing that we all use in our everyday lives: lithium ion batteries.

    Almost all of the battery-ready graphite in the world comes from one place: China. That's actually true of lots of the materials that go into batteries, like processed lithium and processed cobalt. Which is why it was such a big deal when, earlier this year, President Biden announced a tariff package that will make a bunch of Chinese imports more expensive. Included in this package are some tariffs on Chinese graphite. He wants to create a new battery future—one that doesn't rely so much on China.

    In this episode, we get down on the ground to look at this big supply chain story through the lens of one critical mineral. And we visit a small town that realizes that it might be the perfect place to create an American graphite industry. And we find that declaring a new battery future is one thing, but making it happen is another thing entirely.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Planet Money
    enJune 12, 2024

    How much national debt is too much?

    How much national debt is too much?
    Most economic textbooks will tell you that there can be real dangers in running up a big national debt. A major concern is how the debt you add now could slow down economic growth in the future. Economists have not been able to nail down how much debt a country can safely take on. But they have tried.

    Back in 2010, two economists took a look at 20 countries over the course of decades, and sometimes centuries, and came back with a number. Their analysis suggested that economic growth slowed significantly once national debt passed 90% of annual GDP... and that is when the fight over debt and growth really took off.

    On today's episode: a deep dive on what we know, and what we don't know, about when exactly national debt becomes a problem. We will also try to figure out how worried we should be about the United States' current debt total of 26 trillion dollars.

    This episode was hosted by Keith Romer and Nick Fountain. It was produced by Willa Rubin and edited by Molly Messick. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez with help from Sofia Shchukina and engineered by Cena Loffredo. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 07, 2024

    The history of light (classic)

    The history of light (classic)
    For thousands of years, getting light was a huge hassle. You had to make candles from scratch. This is not as romantic as it sounds. You had to get a cow, raise the cow, feed the cow, kill the cow, get the fat out of the cow, cook the fat, dip wicks into the fat. All that--for not very much light. Now, if we want to light a whole room, we just flip a switch.

    The history of light explains why the world today is the way it is. It explains why we aren't all subsistence farmers, and why we can afford to have artists and massage therapists and plumbers. (And, yes, people who make podcasts about the history of light.) The history of light is the history of economic growth--of things getting faster, cheaper, and more efficient.

    On today's show: How we got from dim little candles made out of cow fat, to as much light as we want at the flick of a switch.

    Today's show was hosted by Jacob Goldstein and David Kestenbaum. It was originally produced by Caitlin Kenney and Damiano Marchetti. Today's rerun was produced by James Sneed, and edited by Jenny Lawton. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Engineering by Valentina Rodríguez Sánchez. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 05, 2024

    How the FBI's fake cell phone company put criminals into real jail cells

    How the FBI's fake cell phone company put criminals into real jail cells
    There is a constant arms race between law enforcement and criminals, especially when it comes to technology. For years, law enforcement has been frustrated with encrypted messaging apps, like Signal and Telegram. And law enforcement has been even more frustrated by encrypted phones, specifically designed to thwart authorities from snooping.

    But in 2018, in a story that seems like it's straight out of a spy novel, the FBI was approached with an offer: Would they like to get into the encrypted cell phone business? What if they could convince criminals to use their phones to plan and document their crimes — all while the FBI was secretly watching? It could be an unprecedented peek into the criminal underground.

    To pull off this massive sting operation, the FBI needed to design a cell phone that criminals wanted to use and adopt. Their mission: to make a tech platform for the criminal underworld. And in many ways, the FBI's journey was filled with all the hallmarks of many Silicon Valley start-ups.

    On this show, we talk with journalist Joseph Cox, who wrote a new book about the FBI's cell phone business, called Dark Wire. And we hear from the federal prosecutor who became an unlikely tech company founder.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Planet Money
    enMay 31, 2024

    So you've been scammed, now what?

    So you've been scammed, now what?
    We are living in a kind of golden age for online fraudsters. As the number of apps and services for storing and sending money has exploded – so too have the schemes that bad actors have cooked up to steal that money. Every year, we hear more and more stories of financial heartbreak. What you don't often hear about is what happens after the scam?

    On today's show, we follow one woman who was scammed out of over $800,000 on her quest to get her money back. That journey takes her from the halls of the FBI to the fraud departments of some of the country's biggest financial institutions. And it offers a window into how the systems that are theoretically designed to help the victims of financial cybercrime actually work in practice.

    This episode was hosted by Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi and Jeff Guo. It was produced by Willa Rubin and edited by Keith Romer. It was engineered by Neal Rauch and fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enMay 29, 2024

    Related Episodes

    EP85 | 共鳴 Resonate

    EP85 | 共鳴 Resonate
    今天這集從大學宿舍聊到了對身分認同的共鳴~ In today's episode we talk about dormitory in the university and then to the resonance of identity. 除了幫助大家學習中文 In addition to help you learn Mandarin 希望我們的節目也常常為你帶來共鳴喔! Hope our content also resonates with you often! . . . 🔸Transcript: https://linktr.ee/ttmctw 🔸Support our work: https://ko-fi.com/ttmctw 🔸Instagram: @ttmctw ✉️ talktalkmandarinchinese@gmail.com