Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • The Long Legal Battle Over a Cat FortuneProper estate planning is crucial to ensure charitable intentions are met, as the story of Barbara Thorpe and her cat fortune illustrates.

      Barbara Thorpe, a cat-loving woman from Maine, left her fortune of over $200,000 to create a charitable trust for the abandoned and unwanted cats in her town. However, her will sparked a long legal battle that lasted over a decade, and the cat fortune seemed to disappear. This story highlights the importance of proper estate planning and the potential complications that can arise when leaving a significant amount of money for a specific purpose. It also shows the power of one person's love and dedication to making a difference in the lives of many animals.

    • Control of funds by deceased raises complex situationsDeceased control of funds can lead to complex situations, as seen in the case of Barbara Thorpe's $200,000 fortune for stray cats, which went to humans caring for them.

      Charitable trusts allow the deceased to control vast amounts of money and land indefinitely, which can lead to complex situations. This was once illegal due to the potential complications. For instance, Barbara Thorpe left her $200,000 fortune to the stray cats of Dixfield, Maine. The money couldn't be given directly to the cats, so it went to humans who would take care of them. The most obvious candidates were the local cat ladies, led by Brenda Jarvis. Despite the name similarities, it's important to remember that Barbara was the one who left the money and Brenda is the chief cat lady. During our visit, we found Brenda living in a trailer filled with cats, committed to her cat lady life. She had turned her parents' trailer into a cat sanctuary, housing dozens of strays until recently when she downsized to caring for only 11. This story raises the question of whether it's a good idea to let the dead control funds that can reach into our lives. While some may argue it's a way to ensure the continuation of charitable causes, others may see it as a complicated arrangement.

    • Brenda's Hope for Her Cats' Future FadesBrenda, a dedicated cat lady, suspected trustees of misusing funds meant for cats' welfare, but she continued to care for her own cats despite financial struggles.

      Brenda, a cat lady from a small town, went above and beyond to protect and care for her cats, even when faced with financial struggles. However, when she learned that a wealthy woman, Barbara Thorpe, had left a substantial amount of money for the benefit of cats in the town, Brenda was hopeful that her cats would finally have more resources. Yet, years went by and the cats did not receive any of the funds. Suspicions arose as Brenda began to wonder if the trustees, Gertrude Crosby and her husband Ben, along with their friend Charlotte, were misusing the money. Despite her concerns, Brenda's determination to provide for her cats remained unwavering.

    • Dispute over Dixfield cat fortune was not about theft but differing opinions on use of fundsClear communication and transparency are crucial in managing trusts or similar funds to prevent misunderstandings and potential legal battles.

      The long-running dispute over the Dixfield cat fortune was not about theft, but rather a disagreement on how best to use the funds for the benefit of the cats. The Crosby's, who were managing the trust, were found to have been paid for their services, but critics believed they should have spent more of the money directly on the cats. The legal battle lasted over a decade, with the town even filing a lawsuit, before Brenda, one of the cat advocates, eventually gave up due to stress. The court records revealed that the Crosby's had indeed left most of the money untouched, but they believed it was best to invest it and use the income for cat-related projects. This misunderstanding and the ensuing legal battle highlight the importance of clear communication and transparency in managing trusts or similar funds.

    • Ensuring the Wishes of the Deceased are Carried Out CorrectlyWell-intentioned individuals may struggle to manage charitable trusts, but the role of an assistant attorney general is crucial in ensuring the deceased's wishes are carried out correctly, especially for unusual cases like animal charities. Addressing climate change and taking action, no matter the size, is important.

      Well-intentioned individuals, like the Crosby's, may struggle to effectively manage charitable trusts, even when their hearts are in the right place. In this case, their efforts to establish a cat shelter in memory of Barbara fell short due to their lack of experience. However, the role of an assistant attorney general, like Christina Moylan, is crucial in ensuring that the wishes of the deceased are carried out correctly, even for seemingly unusual cases like animal charities. Despite the challenges, the importance of addressing climate change and taking action, no matter the size, is a recurring theme. The job of an attorney general to oversee charitable trusts, including those benefiting animals, is an essential part of the legal system, even if it involves dealing with the wishes of the deceased.

    • Understanding the Evolution and Challenges of Forever CharitiesForever charities, or charitable trusts established by deceased individuals, have evolved from being seen as a 'dead hand' controlling resources indefinitely to being accepted as a means to encourage philanthropy. However, managing these trusts comes with challenges such as determining the original donor's intentions and adapting to changing circumstances.

      The idea of forever charities, or charitable trusts established by deceased individuals, has evolved over time. Initially, there were concerns about the "dead hand" of the past controlling resources indefinitely. However, industrialists like Rockefeller and Carnegie changed perceptions by using their wealth to help the needy. This led to the acceptance of forever charities as a means to encourage philanthropy. However, managing these trusts comes with challenges. The first issue is determining the original donor's intentions. In the case of the Dixfield Cats, Christina had to figure out how Barbara Thorpe's wishes should be carried out. The second challenge is adapting to changing circumstances. Milton Hershey's trust, established in 1918, was designed to fund a school for orphans. However, the world has changed significantly since then, and the relevance of such a trust today might be questioned. In conclusion, while forever charities have their benefits, they also present challenges in understanding the original donor's intentions and adapting to the changing world. Effective management requires a clear understanding of the donor's wishes and the ability to adapt to new circumstances.

    • Challenges in implementing philanthropists' intentionsDespite clear intentions, philanthropic endeavors can face legal hurdles and difficulty finding suitable organizations to manage funds, requiring a balance between honoring original intent and adapting to changing circumstances.

      The intentions of philanthropists, even those with seemingly clear directives, can face challenges in being fully implemented due to various circumstances and the passage of time. In the case discussed, the Hershey Industrial School trust, established to help poor white male orphans, faced legal hurdles when trying to expand its mission. Similarly, Barbara Thorpe's cat fortune, intended for stray cats in Dixfield, faced difficulties in finding a suitable organization to manage the funds. Ultimately, both cases illustrate the importance of striking a balance between honoring the original intent and adapting to changing circumstances. The outcome may not always align perfectly with the original vision, but the goal is to ensure that the funds are used effectively and efficiently to benefit the intended recipients.

    • Ethical questions raised over use of deceased philanthropist's fund for stray catsThe Barbara Thorpe Fund, while providing essential veterinary care for stray cats, has raised ethical concerns due to potential misalignment between the donor's original intentions and the current use of the funds. A renewed partnership between the shelter and a local cat rescuer offers hope for more effective and inclusive charitable giving.

      The Barbara Thorpe Fund, established by a deceased philanthropist, has been providing vital veterinary care for stray cats from Dixfield at an animal shelter. These cats receive special treatment with their needs fully funded. However, the arrangement has raised ethical questions about the control of deceased individuals' fortunes and the potential misalignment between their original intentions and the eventual use of their charitable funds. The discussion also revealed a potential disconnect between the shelter and a local cat rescuer, Brenda, who could have benefited from the fund's resources. The discovery of this miscommunication sparked hope for a renewed partnership and the possibility of more effective and inclusive use of the philanthropic funds.

    • People's intentions and actions don't always alignThe podcast 'Here and Now Anytime' shares local stories that resonate with communities, highlighting the importance of understanding people's intentions and actions may not align.

      Even in seemingly straightforward situations, there can be unexpected twists and turns. In the story, Brenda's decision to leave her property and cats to trusted friends, despite her initial plan to use the money for the cats, shows that people's intentions and actions don't always align. Additionally, the episode highlights the importance of local news and stories that resonate with communities. The podcast "Here and Now Anytime" brings such stories to listeners, allowing them to connect with their own communities and find common ground with people around the world. The episode also touched upon various other intriguing topics, such as the connection between Trump's mugshot and Paris Hilton's, the implications of George Santos' fake resume, and the idea of the Kardashians as the new Kennedys. Overall, the episode offered fresh perspectives on current events and everyday life.

    Recent Episodes from Planet Money

    Do immigrants really take jobs and lower wages?

    Do immigrants really take jobs and lower wages?
    We wade into the heated debate over immigrants' impact on the labor market. When the number of workers in a city increases, does that take away jobs from the people who already live and work there? Does a surge of immigration hurt their wages?

    The debate within the field of economics often centers on Nobel-prize winner David Card's ground-breaking paper, "The Impact of the Mariel Boatlift on the Miami Labor Market." Today on the show: the fight over that paper, and what it tells us about the debate over immigration.

    More Listening:
    - When The Boats Arrive
    - The Men on the Roof

    This episode was hosted by Amanda Aronczyk and Jeff Guo. It was produced by Willa Rubin, edited by Annie Brown, and engineered by Valentina Rodríguez Sánchez. Fact-checking by Sierra Juarez. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Planet Money
    enJune 29, 2024

    The Carriage Tax (Update)

    The Carriage Tax (Update)
    (Note: A version of this episode originally ran in 2019.)

    In 1794, George Washington decided to raise money for the federal government by taxing the rich. He did it by putting a tax on horse-drawn carriages.

    The carriage tax could be considered the first federal wealth tax of the United States. It led to a huge fight over the power to tax in the U.S. Constitution, a fight that continues today.

    Listen back to our 2019 episode: "Could A Wealth Tax Work?"

    Listen to The Indicator's 2023 episode: "Could SCOTUS outlaw wealth taxes?"

    This episode was hosted by Greg Rosalsky and Bryant Urstadt. It was originally produced by Nick Fountain and Liza Yeager, with help from Sarah Gonzalez. Today's update was produced by Willa Rubin and edited by Molly Messick and our executive producer, Alex Goldmark.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 26, 2024

    The Vapes of Wrath

    The Vapes of Wrath
    When the vape brand Juul first hit the market back in 2015, e-cigarettes were in a kind of regulatory limbo. At the time, the rules that governed tobacco cigarettes did not explicitly apply to e-cigarettes. Then Juul blew up, fueled a public health crisis over teen vaping, and inspired a regulatory crackdown. But when the government finally stepped in to solve the problem of youth vaping, it may have actually made things worse.

    Today's episode is a collaboration with the new podcast series "Backfired: the Vaping Wars." You can listen to the full series at audible.com/Backfired.

    This episode was hosted by Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi and Leon Neyfakh. It was produced by Emma Peaslee and edited by Jess Jiang with help from Annie Brown. It was fact checked by Sofia Shchukina and engineered by Cena Loffredo. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 21, 2024

    Why is everyone talking about Musk's money?

    Why is everyone talking about Musk's money?
    We've lived amongst Elon Musk headlines for so long now that it's easy to forget just how much he sounds like a sci-fi character. He runs a space company and wants to colonize mars. He also runs a company that just implanted a computer chip into a human brain. And he believes there's a pretty high probability everything is a simulation and we are living inside of it.

    But the latest Elon Musk headline-grabbing drama is less something out of sci-fi, and more something pulled from HBO's "Succession."

    Elon Musk helped take Tesla from the brink of bankruptcy to one of the biggest companies in the world. And his compensation for that was an unprecedentedly large pay package that turned him into the richest person on Earth. But a judge made a decision about that pay package that set off a chain of events resulting in quite possibly the most expensive, highest stakes vote in publicly traded company history.

    The ensuing battle over Musk's compensation is not just another wild Elon tale. It's a lesson in how to motivate the people running the biggest companies that – like it or not – are shaping our world. It's a classic economics problem with a very 2024 twist.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 19, 2024

    What's with all the tiny soda cans? And other grocery store mysteries, solved.

    What's with all the tiny soda cans? And other grocery store mysteries, solved.
    There's a behind the scenes industry that helps big brands decide questions like: How big should a bag of chips be? What's the right size for a bottle of shampoo? And yes, also: When should a company do a little shrinkflation?

    From Cookie Monster to President Biden, everybody is complaining about shrinkflation these days. But when we asked the packaging and pricing experts, they told us that shrinkflation is just one move in a much larger, much weirder 4-D chess game.

    The name of that game is "price pack architecture." This is the idea that you shouldn't just sell your product in one or two sizes. You should sell your product in a whole range of different sizes, at a whole range of different price points. Over the past 15 years, price pack architecture has completely changed how products are marketed and sold in the United States.

    Today, we are going on a shopping cart ride-along with one of those price pack architects. She's going to pull back the curtain and show us why some products are getting larger while others are getting smaller, and tell us about the adorable little soda can that started it all.

    By the end of the episode, you'll never look at a grocery store the same way again.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 14, 2024

    Bringing a tariff to a graphite fight

    Bringing a tariff to a graphite fight
    Graphite is sort of the one-hit wonder of minerals. And that hit? Pencils. Everyone loves to talk about pencils when it comes to graphite. If graphite were to perform a concert, they'd close out the show with "pencils," and everyone would clap and cheer. But true fans of graphite would be shouting out "batteries!" Because graphite is a key ingredient in another important thing that we all use in our everyday lives: lithium ion batteries.

    Almost all of the battery-ready graphite in the world comes from one place: China. That's actually true of lots of the materials that go into batteries, like processed lithium and processed cobalt. Which is why it was such a big deal when, earlier this year, President Biden announced a tariff package that will make a bunch of Chinese imports more expensive. Included in this package are some tariffs on Chinese graphite. He wants to create a new battery future—one that doesn't rely so much on China.

    In this episode, we get down on the ground to look at this big supply chain story through the lens of one critical mineral. And we visit a small town that realizes that it might be the perfect place to create an American graphite industry. And we find that declaring a new battery future is one thing, but making it happen is another thing entirely.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Planet Money
    enJune 12, 2024

    How much national debt is too much?

    How much national debt is too much?
    Most economic textbooks will tell you that there can be real dangers in running up a big national debt. A major concern is how the debt you add now could slow down economic growth in the future. Economists have not been able to nail down how much debt a country can safely take on. But they have tried.

    Back in 2010, two economists took a look at 20 countries over the course of decades, and sometimes centuries, and came back with a number. Their analysis suggested that economic growth slowed significantly once national debt passed 90% of annual GDP... and that is when the fight over debt and growth really took off.

    On today's episode: a deep dive on what we know, and what we don't know, about when exactly national debt becomes a problem. We will also try to figure out how worried we should be about the United States' current debt total of 26 trillion dollars.

    This episode was hosted by Keith Romer and Nick Fountain. It was produced by Willa Rubin and edited by Molly Messick. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez with help from Sofia Shchukina and engineered by Cena Loffredo. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 07, 2024

    The history of light (classic)

    The history of light (classic)
    For thousands of years, getting light was a huge hassle. You had to make candles from scratch. This is not as romantic as it sounds. You had to get a cow, raise the cow, feed the cow, kill the cow, get the fat out of the cow, cook the fat, dip wicks into the fat. All that--for not very much light. Now, if we want to light a whole room, we just flip a switch.

    The history of light explains why the world today is the way it is. It explains why we aren't all subsistence farmers, and why we can afford to have artists and massage therapists and plumbers. (And, yes, people who make podcasts about the history of light.) The history of light is the history of economic growth--of things getting faster, cheaper, and more efficient.

    On today's show: How we got from dim little candles made out of cow fat, to as much light as we want at the flick of a switch.

    Today's show was hosted by Jacob Goldstein and David Kestenbaum. It was originally produced by Caitlin Kenney and Damiano Marchetti. Today's rerun was produced by James Sneed, and edited by Jenny Lawton. It was fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Engineering by Valentina Rodríguez Sánchez. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enJune 05, 2024

    How the FBI's fake cell phone company put criminals into real jail cells

    How the FBI's fake cell phone company put criminals into real jail cells
    There is a constant arms race between law enforcement and criminals, especially when it comes to technology. For years, law enforcement has been frustrated with encrypted messaging apps, like Signal and Telegram. And law enforcement has been even more frustrated by encrypted phones, specifically designed to thwart authorities from snooping.

    But in 2018, in a story that seems like it's straight out of a spy novel, the FBI was approached with an offer: Would they like to get into the encrypted cell phone business? What if they could convince criminals to use their phones to plan and document their crimes — all while the FBI was secretly watching? It could be an unprecedented peek into the criminal underground.

    To pull off this massive sting operation, the FBI needed to design a cell phone that criminals wanted to use and adopt. Their mission: to make a tech platform for the criminal underworld. And in many ways, the FBI's journey was filled with all the hallmarks of many Silicon Valley start-ups.

    On this show, we talk with journalist Joseph Cox, who wrote a new book about the FBI's cell phone business, called Dark Wire. And we hear from the federal prosecutor who became an unlikely tech company founder.

    Help support Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+
    in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy

    Planet Money
    enMay 31, 2024

    So you've been scammed, now what?

    So you've been scammed, now what?
    We are living in a kind of golden age for online fraudsters. As the number of apps and services for storing and sending money has exploded – so too have the schemes that bad actors have cooked up to steal that money. Every year, we hear more and more stories of financial heartbreak. What you don't often hear about is what happens after the scam?

    On today's show, we follow one woman who was scammed out of over $800,000 on her quest to get her money back. That journey takes her from the halls of the FBI to the fraud departments of some of the country's biggest financial institutions. And it offers a window into how the systems that are theoretically designed to help the victims of financial cybercrime actually work in practice.

    This episode was hosted by Alexi Horowitz-Ghazi and Jeff Guo. It was produced by Willa Rubin and edited by Keith Romer. It was engineered by Neal Rauch and fact-checked by Sierra Juarez. Alex Goldmark is Planet Money's executive producer.

    Help support
    Planet Money and hear our bonus episodes by subscribing to Planet Money+ in Apple Podcasts or at plus.npr.org/planetmoney.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy
    Planet Money
    enMay 29, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Transparency

    Transparency

    Episode 6 of the Giving Thought podcast looks at the issue of transparency of civil society organisations and philanthropy. Rhod and Adam take a tour through the following topics:

    • The case for transparency: it has long been said that philanthropy needs to become more transparent in order to identify gaps, duplications drive efficiency, identify trends and increase accountability. Furthermore, advances in technology mean that philanthropy ‘Big Data’ could present powerful new opportunities for strategic giving. In addition, it has been recognised that when the powerful and the wealthy use their philanthropy to exert influence anonymously it can lead to a democratic deficit.
    • In defence of anonymity: philanthropy is often a very personal and emotional act and in some cultures and religions, donors are expected to give without taking credit. In other words, to give transparently may undermine the emotional rewards of giving. There are also situations where transparency could put philanthropy - and beneficiaries in particular - at risk. A trend for restricting foreign funding to advocacy and human rights groups could mean that calls for transparency by some governments are being used to flush out and silence critical voices in society. Finally, some wealthy philanthropists believe that the only way to fund grass roots movements which are challenging the current system is to do so anonymously in order to break the link between donor (necessarily a beneficiary of the system) and charity.
    • Blockchain and radical transparency: By ensuring that all transactions of cryptocurrencies or other non-fungible assets are recorded on a public ledger which is distributed across a shared global network, blockchain technology could create a transparency so total that it revolutionises the very concept. Such could be the impact of blockchain on philanthropy, it might mean an end to regulation, intermediary organisations or even the notion of charities themselves as we currently understand them.

     

    Related content from Giving Thought:

    Episode 102: Conversations with Industry Icons - Episode 28 with Kelli Smith

    Episode 102:  Conversations with Industry Icons - Episode 28 with Kelli Smith

    There's no better way to kick off March, Women's History Month, than to feature the National Association of Charitable Gift Planner's new Chair, Kelli Smith!

     

    In this 14-minute podcast, Kelli jam-packs three critical lessons she's learned and how she’s achieved them:

    • Be fearless;
    • Have solid relationships; and,
    • Be fully present.

    Don't miss this insightful podcast!  Kelli also shares how she overcame the imposter syndrome. 

    Episode 99: Conversations with Industry Icons - Episode 26 with Cindy Atmar

    Episode 99:  Conversations with Industry Icons - Episode 26 with Cindy Atmar

    Eddie sits down with Cindy Atmar, Executive Director of Trusts, Estate and Gift Planning, at The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, the largest cancer center in the United States. 

    In this 9-minute podcast, Cindy shares:

    • A perfect reminder as we approach year-end on what to keep at the forefront of your donor giving goals;
    • What she wishes she would have learned early on in her career; and,
    • What bit of advice she would give someone who's beginning their career.