Podcast Summary
Allegations of vote manipulation in Michigan, tensions between politicians and media, and importance of transparency and privacy.: Michigan election officials faced pressure to change votes, ASLO software raises concerns, Cuomo's heated press conference, transparency and accountability, prioritize online privacy with a VPN, and We the People Holsters for safe gun carrying.
There have been allegations of vote manipulation in Wayne County, Michigan during the 2020 election. Two Republican election board officials reportedly faced pressure to change their votes, sparking concerns about the integrity of the count. Additionally, there is a software called ASLO used for voter auditing that has raised eyebrows due to its use in the process. A video of New York Governor Andrew Cuomo losing his temper during a press conference also surfaced, highlighting tensions between politicians and the media. Dan Bongino emphasized the importance of transparency and accountability in the electoral process. Furthermore, he encouraged listeners to prioritize their privacy online by using a VPN service like ExpressVPN. Lastly, Dan shared that he always ensures he feels good before hosting the show, and promoted We the People Holsters for safe and responsible firearm carrying.
Allegations of suspicious voting patterns in Wayne County, Michigan: Addressing any allegations of voter fraud or irregularities is crucial to maintain the integrity of the electoral process and ensure every vote is counted fairly and accurately.
There have been allegations of suspicious voting patterns in Wayne County, Michigan, which could potentially impact the certification of Joe Biden as the President-elect. Two Republican election board members in Wayne County refused to certify the vote due to irregularities, but were later pressured into rescinding their decision. The issue goes beyond Wayne County, as problems with the certification in Michigan could lead to issues in other states and potentially prevent Biden from being certified as the president-elect. The situation highlights the importance of addressing any allegations of voter fraud or irregularities, regardless of the community in which they occur. It's essential to ensure that every vote is counted fairly and accurately to maintain the integrity of the electoral process.
Two Michigan commissioners question vote count irregularities: Two GOP commissioners challenge potential vote count discrepancies in Wayne County, Michigan, urging others to join them. The issue stems from the difference between absentee ballots sent and received, with concerns over authenticity or origin.
Two Republican county commissioners in Wayne County, Michigan, are standing up against alleged irregularities in the vote count and are encouraging others to join them. This situation is being compared to a dance festival video where the first person to join a dance makes it a movement. The issue at hand is the discrepancy between the number of absentee ballots sent out and the number received, which has been a problem in Wayne County since 2017. The simplest explanation, according to the speaker, is that some of the returned ballots were not genuine or came from elsewhere. The speaker emphasizes the importance of asking questions and not assuming the least likely explanation without evidence. Additionally, there seems to be an effort to silence those asking questions about the situation.
Growing concerns about election integrity and allegations of irregularities: Reports of potential vote manipulation in key states have led to numerous lawsuits and calls for transparency, but there's pressure to stay silent. Specific instances of illegal ballot envelope alterations in Wisconsin raise serious questions about election results' validity.
There are growing concerns about the integrity of the 2020 election process, with allegations of irregularities and potential vote manipulation in several key states. These allegations have led to numerous lawsuits and calls for transparency, but there is significant pressure on individuals, particularly those in the media, to not discuss these issues publicly. For example, there have been reports of friends and colleagues receiving pressure to stay silent on the matter. The Wisconsin lawsuit filed by the Trump campaign highlights specific instances of municipal clerks illegally altering absentee ballot envelopes, which could potentially disqualify thousands of votes. These actions violate Wisconsin state law and raise serious questions about the validity of the election results. It is essential that we as a society are allowed to ask questions and seek answers to ensure the legitimacy of our democratic process. The pressure to not discuss these issues is overwhelming, but it is crucial that we continue to investigate and shed light on any potential irregularities to maintain public trust in our electoral system.
Efforts to silence those questioning 2020 election security continue: Dan Bongino vows to keep asking questions about election security despite being deplatformed. Importance of cybersecurity and protecting against identity theft discussed, with a promotion for Lifelock. CISA head's firing and potential risks of using hotel Wi-Fi for work also addressed.
Despite efforts to silence them, those questioning the security of the 2020 election are not backing down. Dan Bongino expressed his unwavering determination to continue asking questions, no matter where they are deplatformed. Additionally, the discussion touched on the importance of cybersecurity and protecting against identity theft, with a promotion for Lifelock. The firing of the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) head, who made a controversial statement about the security of the 2020 election, was also mentioned, along with the potential security risks of using hotel Wi-Fi for work. Overall, the conversation emphasized the importance of staying informed and vigilant in the face of potential threats.
DHS partners with nonprofit for election auditing tool: The DHS's cybersecurity agency partnered with a nonprofit for an election auditing tool, Arlo, but concerns about the nonprofit's ties to left-leaning organizations and major donors raise questions about impartiality.
During the 2020 elections, the Department of Homeland Security's cybersecurity agency (DHS SISA) partnered with a nonprofit group called Voting Works to develop an election auditing tool named Arlo. The reason for this partnership instead of individual state and local governments handling their audits was due to the use of an open-source software tool called Arlo, which was provided to them for free. However, the origins of this nonprofit and its funding raised concerns due to its ties to left-leaning organizations and major donors, including those linked to George Soros. While this partnership does not necessarily imply election fraud, it does raise questions about the impartiality and potential biases in the election auditing process. The government should aim for non-partisan solutions in ensuring the integrity and transparency of the voting system.
Government-left group partnership for voting system audit raises concerns: The involvement of left-leaning groups and undisclosed ties to companies like Dominion and Smartmatic in election security audits has fueled skepticism and questions about conflicts of interest.
The partnership between government entities and left-leaning groups to audit voting systems, which have raised suspicions among some due to past concerns about the reliability of those systems, has caused skepticism and raised questions about potential conflicts of interest. The failure to disclose the involvement of companies like Dominion and Smartmatic, which have been at the center of allegations of vote manipulation, in statements about election security only adds to these concerns. This situation would have been perceived very differently if the roles were reversed and a right-leaning billionaire was financing the audit of a vote that had elected a Democratic president. The lack of transparency and potential conflicts of interest in this process underscore the importance of ensuring that election security measures are perceived as fair and unbiased by all Americans.
Democrats raised concerns about Dominion Voting Systems before the 2020 US election: Despite Democrats' concerns about Dominion Voting Systems' security, DHS and Voting Works endorsed an auditing system used in key states
During the 2020 US election, concerns were raised by Democrats about the security of Dominion Voting Systems, yet a statement from the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in conjunction with Dominion declared the system safe and secure. These same concerns were documented in letters from Democrats Elizabeth Warren, Ron Wyden, Amy Klobuchar, and Mark Pocan to various capital investment groups. Despite these concerns, an auditing system used in key states was backed by the DHS and a group called Voting Works, which is backed by far-left billionaire donors. The ongoing discovery of votes in Georgia adds to the intrigue of the situation. It's important to note that this discussion is not an accusation against Dominion Voting Systems, but rather an inquiry into the validity of the concerns raised before the election and the subsequent actions taken.
Georgia mail-in ballot inconsistencies raise fraud suspicions: Anomalies in Georgia's mail-in ballot rejection rates and texture led to suspicions of potential fraud, emphasizing the need for close scrutiny of electoral processes.
During the discussion, there were concerns raised about anomalies in the mail-in ballot rejection rates in Georgia, which were historically low compared to previous elections. This inconsistency led to speculation about potential fraud. A sworn statement from someone in a court document in Georgia revealed that most mail-in ballots had visible signs of handling, but a batch of ballots were found to be pristine and different in texture, suggesting they may have been intended for absentee use but not used for that purpose. These findings, along with the extremely low rejection rate, raised suspicions and questions about the integrity of the mail-in ballots in Georgia. Overall, the conversation highlighted the importance of examining electoral processes closely to ensure fairness and transparency.
Speaker questions validity of uniformly marked ballots in Georgia: Approximately 98% of observed ballots in Georgia were uniformly marked for Joe Biden, while only 2% were for Trump. The speaker questioned their validity due to their pristine condition and identical markings, unlike typical hand-filled ballots.
During the discussion about handling ballots in Georgia, an affidavit was shared suggesting that approximately 98% of the observed ballots were uniformly marked for Joe Biden, while only 2% were for President Donald J. Trump. The speaker emphasized that these ballots appeared pristine and not handled, unlike typical mail-in ballots. The speaker also noted that the markings on these ballots were uniform and identical, which is unusual for hand-filled ballots and more consistent with a ballot marking device. The speaker questioned the validity of these ballots and called for further investigation. In nature, nothing is uniform, and the principle of entropy and disorder reigns. The uniformity of these ballots raises concerns and requires an explanation. The speaker encouraged listeners to check out additional resources for more information on this topic.
Testimonies of ballot switching during Georgia recount: Three Afghans and an observer reported seeing ballots for Trump being counted for Biden during Georgia recount. Further investigation is needed.
During the Georgia recount process, several witnesses testified that they saw ballots for Trump being counted for Biden. Three Afghans swore they saw this activity, and one even claimed to have recorded it on video. Another observer, Nicholas Zera, reported the same observation at multiple tables. When he brought the issue to the attention of the election official, he faced hostility and was prevented from asking further questions. While there could be innocent explanations, the consistent reports of this activity are concerning and warrant further investigation. Additionally, there have been seismic shifts in the world of television, with Joy Reid moving up to the second spot as the second dumbest person on television, according to Dan Bongino. In other news, with the holiday season approaching, there's a rise in break-ins. SimpliSafe is having a huge holiday sale, offering 30% off any system and a free security camera. The home security system, named the best of 2020 by US News and World Report and Forbes, is user-friendly and easy to set up, making it an excellent choice for securing your home during the holidays.
Navigating the Complexities of the Pandemic and Political Leadership: Political leaders' inconsistent decisions during the pandemic create confusion and disarray for parents and students, highlighting the challenges of navigating the ongoing crisis.
The coronavirus pandemic doesn't discriminate and continues to spread regardless of political or geographical boundaries. However, the discussion also highlighted the chaotic situation in New York due to the constant changing of school closures and reopenings, causing confusion and disarray for parents and students. The speaker expressed concern over the behavior of certain political figures, like Governor Andrew Cuomo, who were criticized for their handling of the situation and their apparent disregard for the confusion caused by their decisions. The speaker also shared a personal anecdote about how some politicians crave power and manipulate situations to assert control. Overall, the discussion underscored the challenges and complexities of navigating the ongoing pandemic and the role of political leaders in shaping public response.
Politicians' Hypocrisy in Following COVID-19 Guidelines: Several politicians, including NY Governor Andrew Cuomo, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, and IL Governor JB Pritzker, faced criticism for not following COVID-19 guidelines they imposed on others, leading to public mistrust.
During the discussion, it was highlighted that several politicians have been accused of hypocrisy regarding COVID-19 guidelines. For instance, New York Governor Andrew Cuomo was seen without a mask in public while enforcing mask mandates for others. Similarly, House Speaker Nancy Pelosi visited a salon despite its closure due to the same regulations. Illinois Governor JB Pritzker also faced criticism for his inconsistent behavior. The conversation also touched upon MSNBC's Joy Reid, who was criticized for her partisan stance on the development of vaccines during the Trump administration. The overall consensus was that these politicians' actions contradicted the rules they imposed on their constituents, leading to public outrage and mistrust.
Misunderstanding Pfizer and Moderna's Role in Operation Warp Speed: Despite some claims, Pfizer and Moderna were indeed part of Operation Warp Speed, the initiative that led to the development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. It's crucial to fact-check information before sharing it to prevent the spread of misinformation.
There has been a misunderstanding regarding the involvement of Pfizer and Moderna in Operation Warp Speed, the initiative that led to the development and distribution of COVID-19 vaccines. Contrary to what some commentators have claimed, both companies were indeed part of the operation. This misinformation was highlighted in a discussion between a radio host and MSNBC host Joy Reid, who made the false claim that the companies were not involved. The radio host fact-checked her statement and provided evidence from reputable sources, such as Business Insider, that clearly showed Moderna and Pfizer's involvement in Operation Warp Speed. It's important for individuals to fact-check information before sharing it publicly to avoid spreading misinformation.
Growing concerns over tech tyranny and censorship of conservative voices: Data shows conservative content consistently ranks high on Facebook, but some voices like Dan Bongino's have been targeted, leading to speculation of bias and censorship
There is a growing concern over tech tyranny and censorship of conservative voices on social media platforms, according to Dan Bongino. He shared his experience of being targeted by Facebook and the senator Maisie Hirono, who claimed that there is no evidence of anti-conservative bias on social media. However, data from Crowd Tangle shows that conservative content from sources like Fox News, Ben Shapiro, and Dan Bongino's own page consistently rank in the top 10 most engaged pages on Facebook. Bongino also mentioned that Outbrain, an ad widget company, canceled their contract with Bongino.com without explanation, leading to speculation of tech tyranny. Facebook has fact-checked Bongino's page extensively, and Mark Levin has announced he will no longer post on Facebook after the end of the year due to the platform's perceived bias. The situation highlights the ongoing debate over free speech and censorship on social media, with many arguing that conservative voices are being silenced.
