Podcast Summary
Obama ordered surveillance of Michael Flynn, claims Dan Bongino: Former President Obama is accused of authorizing surveillance on Michael Flynn according to Dan Bongino's radio show revelation.
According to Dan Bongino, former President Barack Obama is responsible for the targeting of Michael Flynn. This was revealed on Bongino's radio show, where he stated that evidence shows Obama ordered the surveillance. Bongino emphasized that this was the answer to the ongoing question in the media about who authorized the targeting of Flynn. The discussion also touched on the current state of firearm sales and the introduction of iTarget Pro, an app and laser round system that allows for safe dry fire training at home. President Trump was mentioned for his blunt assessment of Obama's involvement in the situation.
FBI monitored Flynn's call with Russian ambassador: The FBI investigated Flynn's December 2016 call with the Russian ambassador as part of the Russia probe, having obtained the call record before it was unmasked and shared.
The FBI was monitoring communications between the Russian ambassador and several individuals, including Michael Flynn, who was later appointed as National Security Advisor under President Trump. This monitoring was likely due to a FISA warrant on the Russians. When Flynn spoke with the Russian ambassador on December 29, 2016, following Obama's expulsion of Russian diplomats, someone within the intelligence community identified this call and brought it to the attention of the FBI. This information was then used in the investigation into potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Deputy Director of the FBI, Andrew McCabe, confirmed in his book that the FBI had already obtained the call record between Flynn and Kislyak before it was unmasked and shared with other government officials.
Obama Admin Requested Flynn Call Transcript, Not Unmasking: The Obama administration requested the location of Flynn's call transcript with Kislyak, not his identity, through the PDB.
The Obama administration requested the unmasking of Michael Flynn's name in a phone call transcript with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak on December 29, 2016, despite the media narrative suggesting otherwise. The request was made through the Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) and was not for the purpose of unmasking, but rather to locate the call that the FBI and intelligence community already had in their possession. The media's coverage of the situation has been inaccurate and misleading, with the focus on unmasking requests rather than the initial request for the call transcript. The FBI's deputy director, Andrew McCabe, has confirmed this in his book and testimony. The call was not unmasked, but the Obama administration sought it out due to its interest in the conversation between Flynn and Kislyak.
Obama administration's unusual requests to unmask Michael Flynn: During Obama's last days in office, there were multiple requests to unmask Michael Flynn from intelligence reports, likely to understand his stance on Iran deal opposition.
During the Obama administration, there were numerous requests to unmask the identity of Michael Flynn, who was a critic of the Iran deal, in intelligence reports around December 14th and 15th, 2016. This coincided with Obama's efforts to fortify the Iran deal before leaving office, despite opposition from lawmakers. The unmasking requests were unusual and raised questions about potential surveillance of Flynn by the Obama administration to understand their response to Obama's actions regarding the Iran deal. The evidence includes articles from the Wall Street Journal and Las Vegas Sun, which highlight Flynn's opposition to the Iran deal and the timing of the unmasking requests and the Iran sanctions renewal.
Allegations of Politicization in Obama Administration: During Obama's tenure, allegations arose of White House involvement in investigating Flynn due to perceived disloyalty, potentially impacting intelligence community's political role. FBI misrepresentation led to Flynn's prosecution in Mueller probe, raising concerns.
During the Obama administration, there were allegations that President Obama personally ordered an investigation into then-National Security Advisor Michael Flynn due to his perceived disloyalty and potential exposure of Obama administration actions regarding the Iran deal and intelligence community involvement in politics. The FBI reportedly misrepresented the nature of the interview with Flynn, leading to his eventual prosecution during the Mueller investigation. This case raises concerns about the politicization of law enforcement and intelligence agencies. The discussion also touched upon the importance of high-quality dog food, as exemplified by the brand Ali. Ali prioritizes the health of dogs with vet-formulated recipes, fully transparent ingredients, and fresh, locally sourced ingredients. Their meals are customized to each dog's needs and are more palatable compared to store-bought dog food. Ali offers a significant discount and a free bag of treats for new customers. To learn more and place an order, visit myali.com/try/bongino.
Obama's Alleged Surveillance on Trump's Campaign: Former President Obama is accused of spying on Trump's campaign without a warrant or criminal investigation. The President can request unmasking of American citizens without a warrant, but cannot unilaterally wiretap them.
There are allegations that former President Obama ordered surveillance on Donald Trump's campaign without a warrant or a criminal investigation. This claim was made on a radio show and has been a topic of debate. The discussion also touched upon the fact that to spy on an American citizen's phone calls, a warrant is required. However, if there's no warrant, the President, through the Attorney General, can order unmasking. During a Senate hearing, Rod Rosenstein, a key figure in the ongoing "spygate" controversy, was asked how they obtained information on Flynn without a warrant or a criminal investigation. Rosenstein hesitated to answer, implying there might be other ways, but he didn't elaborate. It was also emphasized that a President cannot unilaterally wiretap an American citizen without court approval. The media has shown little interest in investigating these allegations further.
Allegations of politically motivated investigations during Obama's administration: Former Obama officials may have targeted Michael Flynn for unmasking and quick plea deal to silence him, not for uncovering Trump-Russia collusion.
During the Obama administration, there were allegations of misconduct involving the unmasking of Michael Flynn and the appointment of the Mueller probe, which some believe was politically motivated to continue investigating President Trump without proper oversight. Michael Flynn, a former National Security Advisor, was targeted by the Mueller team due to concerns that he knew information that could be damaging to the Obama administration. The Mueller team reportedly pressured Flynn into a quick plea deal, suggesting they were more interested in silencing him than uncovering collusion between Trump and Russia. The speaker expresses confidence that the truth will come out and that the best day for Barack Obama in this matter was already past.
Mueller team's case against Flynn lacked basis: Mueller team rushed Flynn interview, ignored lack of sanctions mention, and used questionable Logan Act to hide Obama's involvement in Flynn surveillance
The Mueller team's case against Michael Flynn for lying about sanctions during his conversation with Russian ambassador Sergey Kislyak was not based on truth. According to Flynn's lawyers and evidence presented, there was no mention of sanctions in the FBI's own documents from Flynn's interview. The Mueller team's rush to get Flynn to plead guilty in December 2016 was likely to prevent the information about Obama's involvement in the surveillance of Flynn from coming to light and to hide evidence that Flynn did not lie about sanctions. The Logan Act, which was used as a justification for interviewing Flynn about sanctions, is a rarely used and questionable law. The FBI's own documents did not mention a Logan Act violation, and there was no electronic communication (EC) to open the case on this matter. The Mueller team's actions were aimed at burying evidence and protecting Obama's involvement in the targeting of Flynn.
FBI pressure on Flynn without evidence: The FBI lacked evidence against Flynn, pressured him into a plea, and hid the lack of evidence from him, potentially undermining the legitimacy of his plea.
The FBI's lack of evidence led them to pressure General Flynn into a quick guilty plea in the absence of a Logan Act electronic communication record. This pressure was likely due to the unconstitutional nature of the Logan Act and the potential embarrassment of charging someone under it. The FBI also wanted to hide the lack of evidence regarding Flynn's alleged lies about sanctions and the absence of a 302 mentioning sanctions. Ultimately, the FBI did not provide Flynn with the evidence against him, instead choosing to leak information to the media. This raises questions about the legitimacy of Flynn's plea and the motivations behind the FBI's actions.
Mueller team leaked false info to pressure Trump team: The Mueller investigation leaked false information to media outlets, creating public pressure on the Trump team during their investigation for potential collusion with Russia. The true purpose of the leaks may have been to hide something from Flynn's defense team.
During the investigation into potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia in November 2017, the Mueller team leaked information to NBC News and Fusion Ken, known for their collusion hoaxes and propaganda, creating public pressure on the Trump team. The Mueller team didn't have sufficient evidence to bring charges against Flynn, but they leaked false information to these media outlets instead. The controversy surrounding the case lies in the fact that the Mueller team was trying to hide something else from Flynn's defense team, which would come to light if the case went to trial. The edited 302 form, which was shown, is different from the original one, and no one has access to it. This raises questions about transparency and the credibility of the investigation.
FBI 302 report from Flynn interview: Missing or misrepresented?: Despite testimony that an FBI 302 report from Michael Flynn's interview existed and was shared with the White House, its content or whereabouts remain unclear, fueling suspicions of cover-ups and lack of transparency.
There seems to be conflicting information regarding the existence and content of an original FBI 302 report from the January 24, 2017 interview with Michael Flynn. While some sources, including former FBI Director James Comey, have testified that such a report was drafted and shared with the White House that same day, it has since disappeared or remains unavailable to the public. The edited version of the report that was released later does not mention the alleged lies about sanctions that Flynn was eventually charged with. The inconsistencies and lack of transparency surrounding the 302 report have fueled speculation and accusations of cover-ups and deception. The ongoing debate highlights the importance of accountability and transparency in law enforcement and government investigations.
Inconsistencies in Flynn investigation: Despite no lies detected during Flynn's interview, he was later charged. Missing original 302 report and judge's refusal to dismiss case raise questions about investigation's legitimacy
The Flynn investigation and subsequent charges have been shrouded in controversy, with inconsistencies surrounding the handling of key documents and interviews. Former FBI Director James Comey testified that during Flynn's interview, there was no indication that he was lying, yet he was later charged with lying about sanctions that weren't even brought up during the interview. The original 302 report, which likely stated that Flynn wasn't lying, has seemingly disappeared, and the judge in the case, despite the government acknowledging they have no case against Flynn, refuses to dismiss it. The inconsistencies and apparent mishandling of evidence raise serious questions about the legitimacy of the investigation and the impartiality of the judge involved.
Judge's decision to deny gov't request to drop Flynn case is a misapplication of Rule 48: Judge Sullivan's decision to block gov't from dropping Flynn case is a politicized move, misusing Rule 48 to protect against abusive prosecutions rather than its intended purpose
Judge Sullivan's decision to deny the government's request to drop the case against Michael Flynn is a misapplication of Rule 48. This rule is intended to protect defendants from repeated and abusive prosecutions, not to shield the government from political pressure. The government's desire to drop the case against Flynn should be respected, as it is the defendant's right to have the charges against him dismissed when the prosecution no longer wishes to pursue them. The judge's actions are not only an overreach of his authority but also a politicized move that undermines the fairness and impartiality of the judicial process.
The financial crisis and the Flynn situation: Financial models before the 2008 crisis were inaccurate, leading to massive losses and subsequent bailouts. A golden doodle request for those willing to part with one.
The financial models used prior to the 2008 financial crisis were proven to be incorrect, leading to significant losses and what some consider the most expensive software mistake in history. This error, compounded by the subsequent bailouts, had far-reaching consequences. Moving on, the Flynn situation is also an important topic, but we'll delve deeper into that at a later time. I want to thank everyone who listened to last week's show and had a wonderful weekend. A request: if you have a golden doodle puppy and are willing to part with it, please reach out. My wife, Paula, would like one for our daughter, and it's the only breed that doesn't trigger my severe dog allergies. If you're a new subscriber to my YouTube channel, please consider subscribing at youtube.com/Bongino. In just a few weeks, we've gained an impressive 25,000 new subscribers, and it's all free of charge. Thank you for your support.