Logo
    Search

    Running an Election in the Heart of Election Denialism

    enOctober 24, 2022

    Podcast Summary

    • A challenging election day for Maricopa County election officialsThe 2020 election saw unprecedented protests and disruptions, leading to increased harassment and threats towards election workers.

      The 2020 election was unlike any other for election officials, particularly in Maricopa County, Arizona. Steven Richer, the top election official in the county, shares his personal experience of election day, where he spent the entire day voting and interacting with voters, only to find himself down significantly in the early results. What made this election unusual was the unprecedented volume of protests and disruptions outside the tabulation center, fueled by baseless claims of election theft. This level of denialism towards the election results has led to an unprecedented volume of harassment and threats towards election workers, making their job more challenging and contentious than ever before.

    • US Elections 2020: Controversies and ConfrontationsThe 2020 US elections were marred by allegations of voting irregularities and disputes over results, leading to protests and calls to stop the count. Unexpectedly thrust into the center of the controversy, the speaker won the election but was left grappling with misinformation and chaos.

      The 2020 US elections were marked by widespread allegations of voting irregularities and disputes over the results in several key states. This led to heated protests and confrontations outside election offices, with some people calling for the count to be stopped. The speaker, who was seeking to hold office in one of these contested states, found herself unexpectedly thrust into the center of the controversy. She was surprised and disturbed by the militant and confrontational behavior of some voters, including figures like Alex Jones, and the immediate sensationalization of the situation. Despite the challenges, she eventually won the election, but was left grappling with the misinformation and chaos that surrounded the process. Terms like "fractional voting" emerged as theories explaining the perceived irregularities, adding to the confusion and complexity of the situation.

    • Addressing conspiracy theories about election resultsAcknowledge concerns, provide accurate info, and foster open dialogue to maintain trust and confidence in democratic processes.

      As a newly elected official, I'm facing various conspiracy theories regarding the 2020 election results, which range from fractional voting to Sharpie pens causing over votes, to tabulation equipment being connected to the Internet, and even unlawful votes being imported from other countries. These theories, though seemingly preposterous, are deeply held beliefs among some of my supporters. I took these concerns seriously, investigating them thoroughly to understand where they were coming from. However, I later learned that providing explanations wasn't enough to change their minds. The theories keep evolving, and it's essential to address them in a way that maintains respect and trust while also being truthful. I believe it's crucial to acknowledge the concerns, provide accurate information, and foster an environment of open dialogue. By doing so, we can work together to ensure confidence in our democratic processes and move forward as a united community.

    • Politician's truthful decision faces backlashPoliticians face pressure to conform to narratives, even if it means compromising the truth, which can lead to intense backlash.

      During a speaking engagement in early 2021, a politician was faced with a difficult decision: tell the truth about the tabulation machines being used in the election, which could result in backlash from conspiracy theorists, or collude with them for political expediency. The politician ultimately chose to tell the truth, despite the potential consequences. This decision led to intense verbal harassment, including accusations of being an idiot, bought off by Soros, and a fake Christian. The situation escalated to the point where people followed him out of the event and banged on his car windshields. Despite these challenges, the politician continued to attend similar events, having spent the previous two years building relationships within the Republican community. This experience highlights the pressure politicians face to conform to certain narratives, even if it means compromising the truth.

    • Maricopa County Election Controversy: A Hotbed for Conspiracy TheoriesThe 2020 Maricopa County election became a center of conspiracy theories and accusations of fraud, leading to uncomfortable situations for election officials and an unnecessary investigation by the Arizona Senate, escalating into an international issue.

      The 2020 election in Maricopa County became a focal point for conspiracy theories and accusations of fraud, leading to uncomfortable and even dangerous situations for the county's election officials. The Arizona Senate, controlled by Republicans, chose to pursue these theories instead of accepting the results, hiring a company with no election expertise to conduct an audit. This investigation, led by the Cyber Ninjas, attracted significant funding and attention from those promoting the "Stop the Steal" movement, turning Maricopa County into the center of the controversy. Election officials, including the county recorder, were directly threatened and forced to retreat from Republican meetings. Despite the lack of evidence for fraud, the investigation continued to escalate, drawing in state legislators from other states and becoming an international issue.

    • Maricopa County Elections Office under ScrutinyDespite facing intense scrutiny, threats, and allegations, Maricopa County Elections Office Recorder Stephen Richer refused to step down, viewing the challenges as an opportunity to strengthen his commitment to fair and competent elections.

      The Maricopa County Elections Office, under the leadership of Recorder Stephen Richer, faced intense scrutiny and threats during the 2020 election audit. The Cyber Ninjas investigation, backed by the Arizona Senate, accused the office of deleting files related to the election, leading to widespread public outcry and harassment. Recorder Richer pushed back against these allegations, but the backlash included explicit death threats. Despite the danger, Richer did not consider stepping down from his position, viewing the challenges as an opportunity to strengthen his commitment to fair and competent elections. The threats were not limited to him, with even non-public facing employees receiving similar correspondence. The situation underscores the intense emotions surrounding election processes and the need for robust security measures to protect those involved.

    • Arizona's 2022 midterms focused on election denialismCounty Recorder Carrie Lake addressed concerns of business and professional classes, but election denialism's popularity made candidates popular, leading to primaries focused on the same issues

      The 2020 election and the subsequent election denialism became a dominant theme in Arizona politics, particularly during the 2022 midterm elections. County Recorder Carrie Lake, who was at the center of the election controversy, shared her perspective on the situation. She had hoped that the passion and energy surrounding the election denialism would dissipate over time, but it continued to be a critical part of the discourse. When candidates who embraced election denialism began seeking the Republican nomination, Lake believed it was important to pause and address the concerns of the business and professional classes within the party who felt their votes didn't count. However, the base's commitment to election denialism made these candidates popular, and the investigation into the 2020 election almost guaranteed that the next election would be about the same issues. As these candidates traveled the state and fomented more division, preparing logistically for the primaries became a significant challenge.

    • Preparing for elections with anticipated claims of fraudSignificant security measures and resources are needed for elections with anticipated fraud claims, but the election of election deniers to office could create a catch-22 situation, potentially harming the office and democracy.

      Preparing for elections with anticipated claims of fraud requires significant security measures and resources. The Maricopa County elections in the August primaries were technically successful, with ballots distributed on time, accurate printing, and high voter participation. However, claims of fraud and harassment of employees were rampant, leading to a challenging environment. The election of election deniers to statewide offices adds to the uncertainty, creating a catch-22 situation. While it may reduce harassment if these Republicans win, it also signals potential acceptance of election denialism, which could harm the office and democracy as a whole. A more contemplative perspective suggests that it might be in the office's best interest if these Republicans lost.

    • Denialism and election falsification claims may persist despite lossesThe profitability of denialism and election falsification claims incentivizes their continuation in Republican candidacies, but consistent losses may eventually lead to their decline.

      The denialism and election falsification claims, which have become a central feature of some Republican candidacies, may only fade away if these candidates start to lose consistently in elections. The speaker believes that the profitability of such false claims, both politically and financially, incentivizes their continuation. However, the speaker expresses hope that there may be other ways to address this issue. The conversation also touched upon the speaker's frustration with the normalization of extreme behaviors and the loss of friendships due to political differences. The speaker's tone seemed to change towards the end of the conversation, possibly due to an upcoming meeting about legal advice that they were not looking forward to.

    • Running elections in today's climate is demanding and contentiousDespite the pressure, Maricopa County officials continue to run elections amidst lawsuits and harassment. Meanwhile, political developments in Britain and China highlight the complexity and diversity of global political systems.

      Running an election in today's political climate is a challenging and exhausting task. The Maricopa County election official in the interview shared that they have faced numerous lawsuits and public records requests, creating an environment where staff members are constantly under scrutiny and harassment. This constant pressure raises questions about the limits of what a system and its people can endure. Meanwhile, in other parts of the world, political developments continue to unfold. In Britain, Rishi Sunak is set to become the first prime minister of color in British history, while in China, Xi Jinping has secured an unprecedented third term as the country's leader, eliminating term limits and paving the way for a potential lifetime in power. These events underscore the complexity and diversity of political systems around the world and the challenges they face.

    Recent Episodes from The Daily

    The Lingering Questions about the Attempt to Kill Trump

    The Lingering Questions about the Attempt to Kill Trump

    In the week since the assassination attempt on Donald Trump, the security mistakes that led to the shooting have come into sharp focus, prompting Kimberly Cheatle, the head of the Secret Service, to resign.

    Glenn Thrush, who reports on the Justice Department for The Times, discusses what we now know about the service’s lapses that day.

    Guest: Glenn Thrush, a reporter on the Justice Department for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJuly 24, 2024

    The New Hope, and New Worry, of Kamala Harris

    The New Hope, and New Worry, of Kamala Harris

    As Democrat after Democrat races to anoint Vice President Kamala Harris as their party’s presidential candidate, it has become clear that she will face no real challenge for the nomination.

    Nate Cohn, chief political analyst for The Times, and Reid J. Epstein, a Times reporter covering politics, discuss what that smooth path for Ms. Harris could mean for her broader campaign.

    Guest: 

    • Nate Cohn, the chief political analyst for The New York Times.
    • Reid J. Epstein, who covers politics for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJuly 23, 2024

    Joe Biden Drops Out

    Joe Biden Drops Out

    President Biden has dropped out of the 2024 presidential race and endorsed his vice president, Kamala Harris, as his replacement.

    Peter Baker, the chief White House correspondent for The New York Times, discusses how the race for the White House has suddenly been turned upside down.

    Guest: Peter Baker, the chief White House correspondent for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJuly 22, 2024

    Sunday Special: The 100 Best Books of the Century (So Far)

    Sunday Special: The 100 Best Books of the Century (So Far)

    Earlier this month, the New York Times Book Review rolled out the results of an ambitious survey it conducted to determine the best books of the 21st century so far. On this special episode of the Book Review Podcast, host Gilbert Cruz chats with some fellow Book Review editors about the results of that survey and about the project itself.

    To read the full list, please visit: https://www.nytimes.com/interactive/2024/books/best-books-21st-century.html

    For more episodes, search “Book Review podcast” wherever you get your podcasts, and follow the show.

    At the Republican Convention, Trump Achieves Mythical Status

    At the Republican Convention, Trump Achieves Mythical Status

    Donald J. Trump’s acceptance of his party’s nomination put an exclamation point on a triumphant week for a Republican Party that emerged from its convention confident and unified. At the same time, the Democratic Party is moving closer and closer to replacing President Biden on the ticket.

    Jonathan Swan, who covers Mr. Trump’s presidential campaign, gives a behind-the-scenes look at the Republican National Convention, and Reid J. Epstein, who covers Mr. Biden’s re-election campaign, discusses where it stands as expectations are rising among Democrats that the president will reconsider his decision to stay in the race.

    Guest: 

    • Reid J. Epstein, a reporter covering politics for The New York Times.
    • Jonathan Swan, a reporter covering politics and Donald Trump’s presidential campaign for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 

    The Daily
    enJuly 19, 2024

    Trump 2.0: He’s Never Sounded Like This Before

    Trump 2.0: He’s Never Sounded Like This Before

    In a special series leading up to Election Day, “The Daily” will explore what a second Trump presidency would look like, and what it could mean for American democracy.

    Since he began his latest campaign, former President Donald J. Trump’s message has changed, becoming darker, angrier and more focused on those out to get him than it ever was before.

    Charles Homans, who covers national politics for The Times, has been studying the evolution of Mr. Trump’s message, and what exactly it means to his supporters and for the country.

    Guest: Charles Homans, who covers national politics for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJuly 18, 2024

    The Surprise Ending to the Mar-a-Lago Documents Case

    The Surprise Ending to the Mar-a-Lago Documents Case

    As the Republican National Convention entered its second day, former President Donald J. Trump and his allies absorbed the stunning new reality that the most formidable legal case against him had been thrown out by a federal judge, who ruled that the appointment of the special counsel who brought the case, Jack Smith, had violated the Constitution. 

    Alan Feuer, who has been covering the classified documents case for The Times, explains what it means that the case could now be dead.

    Guest: Alan Feuer, a reporter covering extremism and political violence for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 

    The Daily
    enJuly 17, 2024

    Trump Picks His Running Mate — and Political Heir

    Trump Picks His Running Mate — and Political Heir

    On the first day of the Republican National Convention, Donald J. Trump chose his running mate: Senator J.D. Vance of Ohio.

    We watched the process unfold in real time in Milwaukee.

    Michael C. Bender, who covers Mr. Trump and his movement for The Times, takes us through the day.

    Guest: Michael C. Bender, a political correspondent covering Donald J. Trump and his Make America Great Again movement for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 

    The Daily
    enJuly 16, 2024

    The Attempted Assassination of Donald Trump

    The Attempted Assassination of Donald Trump

    Today’s episode sets out what we know about the attempted assassination of former President Donald J. Trump at a rally in Pennsylvania on Saturday evening.

    Doug Mills, a photographer for The Times, recounts what it was like to witness the shooting, and Glenn Thrush, who covers gun violence for The Times, discusses the state of the investigation into the man who did it.

    Guest: 

    • Doug Mills, a photographer in the Washington bureau of The New York Times.
    • Glenn Thrush, who reports on the Justice Department for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJuly 15, 2024

    Related Episodes

    The Lasting Impact Of The January 6th Insurrection

    The Lasting Impact Of The January 6th Insurrection
    It's been two years since rioters stormed the U.S. Capitol on January 6, 2021, leaving an indelible mark on American democracy.
    We speak to NPR Justice Correspondent Carrie Johnson and NPR Senior Political Correspondent Domenico Montanaro, about how the events of that day continue to impact the country two years later.
    In participating regions, you'll also hear a local news segment to help you make sense of what's going on in your community.
    Email us at considerthis@npr.org.

    Learn more about sponsor message choices: podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    NPR Privacy Policy


    ‘Rankly Unfit’: The View From a Republican Who Voted to Impeach

    ‘Rankly Unfit’: The View From a Republican Who Voted to Impeach

    This episode contains strong language. 

    Three days after being sworn into Congress, Representative Peter Meijer, Republican of Michigan, was sitting in the gallery of the House of Representatives as pro-Trump rioters stormed the Capitol.

    After the siege, Mr. Meijer made his feelings clear: President Trump’s actions proved that he was “rankly unfit.” A week later, he became one of just a handful of Republicans to vote for impeachment.

    We talk with Mr. Meijer about his decision, his party and his ambitions.

    Guest: Representative Peter Meijer, a first-term Republican congressman from Michigan.

    For an exclusive look at how the biggest stories on our show come together, subscribe to our newsletter. You can read the latest edition here.

    Background reading: 

    • Meet the first-term Republican representatives who are emerging as some of their party’s sharpest critics.
    • Many Republican leaders and strategists want to prepare the party for a post-Trump future. But the pro-Trump voter base has other ideas.

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily