Podcast Summary
Discussing current topics with Sebastian Gorka: Former Trump official Sebastian Gorka discussed various current topics including potential return of a long-time Democrat, Durham report, reparations, China's microchip clash with US, and recent developments with Fox after Tucker Carlson's departure. He also shared his background and experiences in the military and intelligence services.
Sebastian Gorka, a former US government official and media personality, joined the podcast to discuss various current topics, including the potential return of a long-time Democrat to politics, the Durham report and Congress' response, reparations, China's microchip clash with the US, and the recent developments with Fox after Tucker Carlson's departure. Gorka, who served in the Trump administration and is known for his unique fashion choices, also shared his background, including his father's experiences as an anti-communist activist in Hungary and his own time in the military and intelligence services. Throughout the conversation, the hosts joked about the thumbnail for the episode and made light-hearted comments about each other's appearances. Despite these distractions, they covered a range of serious issues and provided their perspectives on the current state of politics and world events.
A Hungarian man's experience of the long-term impact of communism on children: Witnessing a difference in his children's education in Hungary and the US, a man realized the deep influence of communist rule on the younger generation, leading him to immigrate to the US.
The speaker, who grew up in Hungary under communist rule, witnessed firsthand the long-term effects of the system on the younger generation. During a visit to their children's school in 2008, he noticed a stark difference between his children, who had been socialized in the US, and their Hungarian peers. Realizing that the watered-down communist regime had still managed to deeply influence the children, he made the decision to leave Hungary and become an American. This experience served as a powerful reminder of the importance of living in a respected country and the long-term impact of political systems on future generations. The speaker's personal journey led him to work for the US military and eventually immigrate to the United States, where he now hosts a radio and TV show.
Hungarian vs American Perception of George Soros: George Soros is perceived differently in Hungary and the US due to cultural and political contexts. In Hungary, he's seen as an anti-Western figure and a bad influence, while in the US, he's viewed as a philanthropist and a progressive figure.
George Soros, a controversial figure, is viewed differently in Hungary compared to how he is perceived in the United States. In Hungary, he is seen as an anti-Western figure and a bad influence on the country due to his perceived efforts to impose his values and decisions on others, as described in a documentary. This perception is largely due to the effective communication efforts of Hungarian leader Viktor Orban, who has portrayed Soros negatively to the Hungarian public. However, it's important to note that this perception may not be shared by all Hungarians, particularly those in urban areas or those who follow politics closely. In the US, Soros is often seen as a philanthropist and a key figure behind various progressive causes. The difference in perception highlights the importance of understanding cultural and political contexts when evaluating the actions and impact of influential figures.
George Soros's Conflicting Identity and Views on America: Soros's lack of remorse for his past actions during the Holocaust raises questions about his motives and beliefs, particularly regarding his view of America. He and his associates see America as the problem, fueled by white guilt, leading to actions like supporting open borders and deals with countries like Iran.
The interview with George Soros reveals his lack of remorse for his role in confiscating the wealth of Hungarian Jews during the Holocaust, despite being a Jewish kid himself. This raises questions about his motives and beliefs, particularly regarding his view of America. Soros and those associated with him, such as Alvin Bragg, see America as the problem and hold white guilt, leading to actions like supporting open borders and deals with countries like Iran. Understanding this perspective can help explain various political and social issues. It's essential to recognize that the divide in America boils down to whether one loves or hates the country. Unfortunately, the right has been struggling to effectively counteract the influence of wealthy individuals and the culture war in the mainstream media.
Elon Musk's Defense of the First Amendment and New Hire as Twitter's CEO: Elon Musk, a political newcomer, defends the First Amendment and hires a potential Reagan Republican, Linda Yaccarino, as Twitter's new CEO to increase ad revenue and transform it into a super app.
Elon Musk, now the CEO of Twitter, is a political novice who has recently discovered his interest in politics and is fiercely defending the First Amendment in response to perceived attacks on America and the First Amendment. Musk's hiring of a potential Reagan Republican, Linda Yaccarino, as Twitter's new CEO, is a strategic move aimed at making Twitter profitable and turning it into a super app by increasing ad revenue. Despite some concerns, Musk's supporters believe that his recent actions and hires indicate that he is on the side of free speech and is determined to challenge the power of big tech and the political establishment.
The size of a social media following doesn't guarantee engagement: Public figures with large followings may not engage with every message, but their influence and reach can still be significant. Holding government agencies accountable is crucial, and budgeting can be a tool for oversight.
The number of followers a person has on social media does not necessarily indicate their engagement or interest in interacting with others. For instance, a public figure with a large following may not have the time or inclination to respond to every message they receive. However, having a significant following can also demonstrate their influence and reach within their industry or community. Furthermore, the Durham report revealed the importance of holding government agencies accountable for their actions and the potential use of budgeting as a tool for oversight. Congressman Jim Jordan has advocated for limiting the FBI's spending as a means to pressure them into reforming their practices, which have been criticized for targeting conservative groups. Overall, the discussion emphasized the significance of authenticity, resilience, and the power of influence in public figures' careers.
FBI and CIA knew of Hillary's plan to frame Trump, but no evidence of collusion was found: The FBI and CIA had knowledge of Hillary Clinton's efforts to frame Donald Trump for Russian collusion before the 2016 election, but no evidence of collusion was found. However, the US government illegally spied on the Trump campaign and White House.
The Durham report revealed that the FBI and CIA had knowledge of Hillary Clinton's plans to frame Donald Trump for Russian collusion before the 2016 election. Despite this information, Obama and Biden were briefed on the matter, and there was no evidence of Russian collusion found. However, the US government illegally spied on the Trump campaign and White House. The speaker believes that the FBI has become a political police force and must be dismantled due to its transformation from an anti-left entity to an anti-right one. This shift occurred after Louis Freeh's tenure, when lawyers began leading positions, and post-9/11 when the FBI's focus shifted from law enforcement to intelligence gathering, making it a spy agency that spies on Americans.
FBI's Transformation into a Politically Biased Intelligence Agency: The FBI's involvement in over 270,000 illegal FISA surveillance requests and its role in the 2016 election raise concerns about its transformation into a politically biased intelligence agency, which cannot be redeemed due to the involvement of tens of thousands of agents and the lack of opposition from the Department of Justice.
The FBI, under the leadership of Mueller and Comey, has transformed into a politically biased intelligence agency. This issue was highlighted recently with the revelation of over 270,000 illegal FISA surveillance requests. The speaker argues that the FBI, which should be focused on its primary missions, cannot be redeemed due to the involvement of tens of thousands of agents and the lack of whistleblowers or opposition from the Department of Justice. The speaker's concerns were further fueled by the actions of the FBI during the 2016 election, specifically James Comey's announcement about Hillary Clinton's emails, which some believe influenced the election outcome. The speaker suggests that the FBI has become a political tool and a "political police force."
FBI's investigation of Hillary Clinton's emails: The FBI's handling of Hillary Clinton's email investigation during the 2016 election was seen as politicized or weaponized, with some believing Director Comey attempted to save Clinton's political career by not prosecuting despite finding numerous potential violations.
The FBI's handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's email server during the 2016 election is seen by some as a politicization or weaponization of the FBI. The infamous press conference given by then-FBI Director James Comey is a key point of contention, as he detailed numerous potential violations of law but ultimately chose not to prosecute Clinton. This decision was met with frustration and disbelief from some FBI agents and was seen as an attempt by Comey to save Clinton's political career. The outcome of this situation contributed to a sense of distrust in the FBI and the political process, and it set the stage for the unusual dynamic between Trump and the FBI during his presidency.
Personnel is Policy: Having personnel who share the administration's values is crucial for successful policy implementation and overall government functioning.
The personnel in the administration play a crucial role in shaping policies and the overall functioning of the government. The speaker, who served as a deputy assistant to President Trump, shared his experience of working in the administration during its early days. He explained how the lack of personnel who shared the administration's values led to challenges and misunderstandings. He emphasized that it is essential to have people who love America in key positions to ensure the success of the administration and the implementation of policies. The speaker also mentioned his plans to help in personnel selection in the next administration. Reagan's quote, "Personnel is policy," highlights the significance of this issue. The speaker's experience serves as a reminder that the personnel in government positions have a significant impact on the country's direction.
Forming a new political team: balancing loyalty and experience: Important to have trusted individuals in top appointments and key positions for administration success, but also necessary to find balance between experienced and new team members, and to train and develop new talent.
The process of forming a new team for a political administration, particularly after a contentious election, presents significant challenges. Some potential appointees may be hesitant to join due to past experiences and personal safety concerns. The issue of bringing in experienced, yet potentially biased individuals versus new, loyal team members is a complex one. The speaker recalls his experience in the Trump administration, where they inherited a large National Security Council and faced challenges in staffing it with loyal, unbiased individuals. The speaker emphasizes the importance of having the top appointments and key positions filled with trusted individuals to ensure the success of the administration. The speaker also warns against repeating past mistakes, such as allowing individuals referred by opposing party members to hold top positions. The speaker concludes by acknowledging the importance of finding a balance between bringing in experienced individuals and new, loyal team members, and the need to train and develop new talent.
Deeply Divided Political Landscape: The establishment views President Trump as an anomaly, while the left sees him as a threat, creating a deeply divided political landscape where effective communication and understanding are crucial.
The political landscape is deeply divided, with each side holding strong convictions and viewing the other as an enemy. On one side, the establishment views President Trump as an anomaly and a joke, believing that they can return to their previous ways of dealing with the Democrats and China. On the other side, the left sees President Trump as a threat and is determined to destroy him, going so far as to question his immigration status and nationality. The stakes are high, and effective communication and understanding are crucial to navigating this complex and hostile environment. The former CIA director, John Brennan, even went as far as accusing the incumbent president of being a Russian asset, which is not just a political difference, but a dangerous and malicious claim.
