Logo

    Sham Hunter Indictment is ALL about Protecting Joe Biden

    enSeptember 15, 2023
    What are the federal gun charges against Hunter Biden?
    How do the charges relate to President Joe Biden?
    What evidence suggests Hunter Biden's foreign dealings?
    Why do Democrats avoid discussing Hunter Biden's actions?
    Who was appointed as special prosecutor for Hunter Biden?

    • Attempt to shield President Joe Biden from larger allegationsFederal gun charges against Hunter Biden are seen as an attempt to divert attention from potential involvement of President Joe Biden in larger corruption allegations

      While Hunter Biden faces federal gun charges, many believe this is an attempt to insulate President Joe Biden from larger allegations of corruption. The indictment focuses on crimes related to Hunter Biden's gun purchases and drug use, which some argue are being emphasized to divert attention from potential involvement of the President. The delay in bringing these charges has also raised eyebrows, with some seeing it as a deliberate effort to protect Joe Biden. The larger issue at hand is the substantial evidence suggesting Hunter Biden solicited and received millions from foreign players in exchange for official favors from his father, the President. This indictment, while significant for Hunter Biden, is seen by some as an attempt to shield Joe Biden from public scrutiny.

    • DOJ's lenient plea deal for Hunter Biden falls apartThe Biden DOJ initially intended to give Hunter Biden a lenient plea deal with immunity, but obstruction and public pressure led to its collapse. Now, without a plea agreement, Hunter faces potential jail time.

      The Biden DOJ's initial plan for Hunter Biden's criminal case was to give him a lenient plea deal with complete immunity for any corrupt activities, including those involving his father. However, the plan changed when the investigation was obstructed, and the heat on the DOJ increased. The judge then questioned the DOJ about their intent to prosecute other potential criminal conduct, leading to the plea agreement falling apart. Now, without a plea deal, the odds are higher that Hunter Biden will serve some jail time, although the length is uncertain. The DOJ's initial lack of commitment to holding Hunter accountable raises concerns about the fairness of the proceedings.

    • Special Prosecutor Appointed to Investigate Hunter BidenMerrick Garland appointed David Wise as special prosecutor to probe Hunter Biden's past actions potentially obstructing justice. A plea deal may lead to jail time, but other Biden allegations may go unexamined.

      Merrick Garland appointed David Wise as special prosecutor to investigate Hunter Biden due to his past actions obstructing justice and covering up potential wrongdoing involving Joe Biden. The most likely outcome is a plea deal, which may result in Hunter serving jail time. The Department of Justice may not investigate other allegations against Biden to protect him. There's been a shift among Democrats and the press to distance Biden from Hunter's actions. The media is trying to downplay the significance of the charges while also sensationalizing the story. It's important to note that EnviroCleanse, an air purifier, can protect against harmful wildfire smoke and other pollutants.

    • Hunter Biden Indicted for Lying About Drug Addiction During Gun PurchaseHunter Biden indicted for lying about drug addiction during gun purchase, likely to be resolved with a plea deal, aimed at ending corruption allegations against Joe Biden, politicized DOJ under Merrick Garland raises concerns, not surprising attempt to put matter to rest.

      Hunter Biden has been indicted on three counts related to lying about drug addiction during a gun purchase in 2018. This indictment, handled by the Biden Department of Justice, is likely to be resolved with a plea deal, according to the speaker. The purpose of this indictment, predicted a year ago, is to put to rest allegations of corruption against Joe Biden amidst an upcoming election. However, despite the evidence suggesting a strong case for conviction, CNN and other media outlets have labeled it as weak. The politicized nature of the Department of Justice under Merrick Garland has been a topic of concern for some, with comparisons being drawn to a two-tiered justice system. The speaker emphasizes that this indictment is not surprising and is an attempt to end the matter.

    • Legal analysis of Hunter Biden case disputedThe outcome of Hunter Biden's gun possession and lying on a background check case remains uncertain, with disagreement over factual and legal issues

      The legal analysis of the case against Hunter Biden, the son of a sitting president, being charged by the justice department for gun possession and lying on a background check form, is disputed. CNN's legal analyst, Jennifer Rogers, believes the case is weak due to factual and legal issues, while others argue that the critical elements of the crime are not in dispute and the laws prohibiting felons and those with serious drug addictions from possessing firearms are valid. The outcome of the case remains uncertain, with potential appeals and legal challenges ahead.

    • The Second Amendment and Felon DisarmamentThe Heller case upheld the right to bear arms for self-defense and constitutional felon disarmament laws.

      The Second Amendment right to bear arms applies to law-abiding citizens for self-defense, and laws restricting felons from possessing firearms are constitutional. This was established in the landmark Heller vs. District of Columbia case, in which the speaker, a legal scholar, represented Texas and 31 other states. On a lighter note, coincidental encounters with the same game on a flight led Ryan to promote Chumba Casino. Regarding impeachment, James Carville, a prominent Democratic strategist, expressed his thoughts on CNN about the White House's handling of the inquiry. He suggested that the White House could be more aggressive and that a war room might be necessary. However, the speaker emphasized that the focus should be on the facts and the constitutional process.

    • CNN discussion on intelligence of congressional membersJames Carville's subjective assessment of some Republican committee members' intelligence was challenged, and the importance of critical evaluation of opinions and potential biases was emphasized.

      The assessment of the intelligence and capabilities of certain congressional Republicans and Democrats made during a recent CNN discussion is subjective and open to interpretation. James Carville, a prominent Democratic strategist, expressed his belief that some Republican committee members lack intelligence, while praising the acumen of some Democrats. However, this characterization has been challenged as baseless, as both James Comer and Jim Jordan have demonstrated deep understanding of issues during previous interviews. Additionally, the assessment of Dan Goldman as a formidable lawyer based on his wealth and political affiliation, while ignoring potential ethical concerns, is also questionable. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of critical evaluation of opinions and the potential biases that can influence them.

    • Ignoring compelling evidence during impeachment hearings can create a false sense of securityThe absence of challenging questions from journalists during impeachment hearings can give a false sense of security to those being interviewed, but the American people deserve to know about substantial evidence of corruption, including emails, texts, burner phones, and testimonies of confidential informants, even if some of it is circumstantial.

      During impeachment hearings, the absence of challenging questions from corrupt journalists can create a false sense of security for those being interviewed, but it's crucial to remember the significance of the evidence against them, which in the case of Joe Biden's corruption allegations, is substantial. James Carville's enthusiasm for the impeachment hearings might backfire, as the American people are largely unaware of the compelling evidence against the Bidens, which includes over 100 suspicious activity reports, emails, burner phones, and testimonies of confidential informants. Although much of this evidence is circumstantial, it is still powerful and is used to convict people of crimes daily. Moreover, there are at least two pieces of direct evidence, such as Hunter Biden's text to a Chinese Communist official and Joe Biden's admission of holding loan guarantees hostage. Ignoring or suppressing this evidence could harm the Democrats in the long run, as the American people deserve to be informed about the potential corruption within their government.

    • White House explains Biden's involvement in Hunter's business as out of love and concernDespite ongoing allegations, President Biden remains focused on national interests and addressing American needs, while the significance and value of Hunter's business dealings remain unclear.

      The White House has changed its stance multiple times regarding President Biden's involvement with Hunter Biden's businesses. The latest explanation is that the president attended Hunter's business meetings out of love and concern for his son during a difficult time. The GOP's own witness testified that no business dealings were discussed during these calls. Despite the ongoing impeachment inquiry, President Biden remains focused on addressing the needs of the American people and advancing national interests on the world stage. The suggestion that the president attended business meetings out of love is seen as a cynical attempt to downplay the significance of the allegations. The value Hunter provided for the large sums of money he received remains unclear.

    • Allegations of financial dealings between Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and foreign oligarchsThere are allegations of significant financial dealings between Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and foreign oligarchs from corrupt and hostile nations, involving massive sums of money, and the Democrats have been avoiding addressing the value Hunter Biden provided in exchange.

      There are allegations of significant financial dealings between Hunter Biden, Joe Biden, and foreign oligarchs from corrupt and hostile nations to America. The amounts of money involved are massive and not from normal American companies or allies. The Democrats have been avoiding addressing what value Hunter Biden provided in exchange for these funds. Furthermore, there are questions surrounding Joe Biden's use of fake emails and multiple burner phones while his son was receiving payments. A montage of Joe Biden's lies and deceit regarding these matters went viral and is important to remember as impeachment proceedings continue. It's also important to note that Patriot Mobile, America's only Christian conservative wireless provider, supports causes aligned with freedom of speech, the sanctity of life, the second amendment, military veterans, and first responders, while other mobile companies may fund organizations like Planned Parenthood.

    • Joe Biden's Son's Business Dealings with Foreign Associates and Introductions to His FatherDespite claims of no evidence, Joe Biden's son Hunter had business dealings with foreign associates from Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan, China, and Mexico, and introduced some to his father, contradicting the narrative of no corruption involvement.

      During Joe Biden's tenure as Vice President, his son Hunter had business dealings with associates from Ukraine, Russia, Kazakhstan, China, and Mexico, and Hunter introduced some of these individuals to his father. Hunter reportedly gave a significant portion of his earnings to his father. There is evidence suggesting that Hunter discussed his father's involvement in these business dealings only in person and that Chinese executives admitted to reporters that they were introduced to the Vice President by Hunter. Hunter made at least 19 visits to the White House during this time, and there is photographic evidence of Biden with Hunter and other Burisma associates. These facts contradict the narrative that there is no evidence of Joe Biden's corruption.

    • The CCP's control over HollywoodThe CCP influences Hollywood by exerting control over major studios to gain access to the Chinese market, as revealed in the documentary 'Hollywood Takeover'.

      The influence of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) in Hollywood has shifted from selling the American dream through films to making nightmares a reality. Major studios are making choices to appease the CCP to gain access to the Chinese market. Tiffany Meyer, an investigative reporter, delves deep into this issue in the documentary "Hollywood Takeover," produced by The Epic Times. In this documentary, she reveals how the CCP exerts control over some major studios. This is a significant documentary that sheds light on an important issue that every movie enthusiast should be aware of. For a limited time, you can watch the first 10 minutes of "Hollywood Takeover" for free by visiting hollywoodtakeover.com/ben. Don't miss out on this important documentary that provides insights into the power dynamics between Hollywood and the CCP.

    Was this summary helpful?

    Recent Episodes from Verdict with Ted Cruz

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io