Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • A Wave of New Abortion Laws and the Future of Roe v WadeNew state laws restrict access to abortions, leading to more out-of-state travel and online purchases of abortion pills. The future of Roe v Wade, which legalized abortion nationwide, is uncertain as the Supreme Court considers a Mississippi law.

      The United States is seeing a wave of new laws restricting access to abortions, with some states aiming for near-total bans. This trend, which includes laws in Oklahoma, Texas, Mississippi, and others, has led to an increase in people traveling out of state for the procedure and purchasing abortion pills online. The future of Roe v Wade, the landmark Supreme Court decision that legalized abortion nationwide, is uncertain as the Supreme Court is expected to make a decision on the Mississippi law. Meanwhile, a woman named Carol Downer, who lived before Roe v Wade, shares her story of performing self-induced abortions and creating a movement for reproductive rights. This episode explores her journey and the impact it had on the larger movement for reproductive justice.

    • Women's struggle for reproductive rights during the 1960sDespite the risks and illegality, women bravely underwent dangerous abortions to assert control over their bodies and lives, paving the way for future reproductive rights.

      Carole's experience during the 1960s highlights the struggles and risks women faced before the legalization of abortions. Carole, a mother of four, was already dealing with the demands of raising her children and marital issues when she became pregnant again. Despite the illegal status of abortions, she made the difficult decision to undergo the procedure. The experience was harrowing, from finding a provider to the actual procedure and the aftermath. The physical and emotional toll was significant, and Carole's ordeal was far from over when she was instructed to remove the gauze left in her vagina, which resulted in an agonizing extraction. Thousands of women went through similar experiences during this era, fueling the growing movement for women's reproductive rights and the eventual legalization of abortions. Carole's story serves as a powerful reminder of the courage and resilience of women who fought for control over their own bodies and lives.

    • Carole's transformative experience at the feminist meetingCarole's observation of an underground abortion procedure inspired her to become an abortion apprentice and start a grassroots movement for self-performed abortions.

      Carole's experience at the feminist meeting led her to question societal expectations of women and ignited a passion for fighting for reproductive rights. She was inspired by the idea that women could learn and perform medical procedures, such as abortions, among themselves. Initially, Carole lacked the necessary knowledge to perform an abortion but sought out an underground clinic to learn. Her first-hand observation of the procedure was a transformative moment, revealing the simplicity and accessibility of the process. Empowered by this discovery, Carole became an abortion apprentice and eventually recruited other women to join her cause. In the spring of 1971, Carole organized a gathering where she shared her knowledge with a group of women, marking the beginning of a grassroots movement for self-performed abortions.

    • First Look at Their Own Bodies: Carole Joffe's 'Speculum Parties'Carole Joffe's demonstration of a speculum during bookstore events in the 1960s allowed women to see their own bodies for the first time, empowering them to question and learn about their reproductive health, challenging the medical establishment's monopoly on knowledge.

      During the 1960s, women's understanding of their own bodies was limited, leading to fear and misconceptions about reproductive health. Carole Joffe, a pioneering activist, recognized this and boldly demonstrated the use of a speculum during a bookstore event, allowing women to see their own bodies for the first time. This simple act led to a shift in mindset, empowering women to question and learn about their bodies, challenging the notion that doctors held all the knowledge. This experience inspired Carole to travel across the country, hosting "speculum parties" to educate women about their reproductive health, ultimately breaking down the taboo surrounding women's bodies and paving the way for greater sexual and reproductive autonomy.

    • Carol Downer's discovery led to women's health movement in late 1960sWomen's self help groups taught themselves about bodies, provided health services and illegal abortions, gaining momentum and empowering women through accurate info and self control.

      Carol Downer's accidental discovery of women's anatomy during a bookstore presentation led to the formation of a women's health movement in the late 1960s and early 1970s. The self helpers, as they came to be known, taught themselves and other women about their bodies through hands-on workshops and clinics. They learned to perform pelvic exams, insert diaphragms, and even do abortions. The movement quickly gained momentum, with at least 50 self help groups forming across the country. The self helpers' goal was to empower women by providing them with accurate information and encouraging them to take control of their own health. While teaching women about their bodies, some self helpers also provided illegal abortions, using a safer technique they had learned. This double mission of education and reproductive health services made the self helpers a controversial yet influential force in the women's health movement.

    • Jane Collective: Providing Safe Abortions Before Roe v. WadeBefore Roe v. Wade, the Jane Collective in Chicago offered safe abortions using homemade methods, saving thousands of women from dangerous back-alley procedures.

      During the 1960s and 1970s, a group of women's rights activists called the "Jane Collective" in Chicago, Illinois, provided illegal but safe abortions to thousands of women before Roe v. Wade legalized the procedure. They used a homemade abortion kit, which involved creating a vacuum in a mason jar and inserting a cannula into the uterus. This method, while unsettling to some, was considered safer than the dangerous alternatives available during that time, such as back-alley abortions or self-administered methods with harmful substances. Despite the risks, there's no evidence of serious complications from the Jane Collective's procedures. The group's actions were motivated by the reality of dangerous and often fatal back-alley abortions, which disproportionately affected low-income women.

    • Underground Abortions and the Women's Self-Help ClinicWomen's fight for reproductive rights led to the establishment of underground clinics providing abortions. Discovery by authorities resulted in arrests and confiscation of equipment, but public support and a high-profile trial brought recognition and inspired a larger movement.

      The women's self-help clinic in Los Angeles, which provided underground abortions, went to great lengths to avoid detection by using code words and maintaining secrecy. However, they were eventually discovered by the police in early 1972. The raid on the clinic was devastating for the women involved, resulting in the confiscation of equipment and the arrest of some of the self-helpers. Despite the challenges, the women fought back, with public support from various quarters, including academics, doctors, and even a congresswoman. The trial became a turning point, with Carole and the self-helpers gaining recognition for their work and inspiring a larger movement for women's reproductive rights. The experience showed that by confronting their oppressors directly, women could challenge the status quo and make significant progress towards greater autonomy and control over their bodies.

    • The Great Yogurt Conspiracy: A landmark case for women's reproductive rightsWomen's self-help groups pioneered safe, illegal abortions using menstrual extractions and yogurt, leading to a legal victory weeks before Roe v. Wade.

      The self-help group's efforts to provide menstrual extractions as a means of safe and illegal abortions during a time when the procedure was not yet legal, led to a landmark case known as "The Great Yogurt Conspiracy." The trial focused on the legality of using yogurt as a tool for the procedure, and ultimately resulted in a not-guilty verdict. This victory came just weeks before the Roe v. Wade decision, which legalized abortions in the United States. The self-help group's determination and innovation did not stop there, as they later used the menstrual extraction kit to help Francie get pregnant. This story began with a woman's first-hand experience of seeing a cervix and ended with the birth of Francie's son. The journey showcases the lengths women went to in order to take control of their reproductive health before the availability of legal abortion.

    • Exploring the safety of abortions and fetal development milestonesThis episode sheds light on the safety of abortions and debunks common misconceptions, while also discussing fetal development milestones like heartbeat and pain sensitivity.

      The Science Versus Abortion episode, produced by Wendy Zuckerman and her team, provides essential facts about the safety of abortions and the developmental milestones of a fetus, including heartbeat and pain sensitivity. Additionally, listeners are encouraged to tune in to the Not Past It podcast next week for an episode about a top-secret 1955 abortion conference. This episode was meticulously produced, edited, and sound-designed by a team of professionals, with valuable contributions from numerous scientists and experts. A special thanks to all those involved, including Michelle Welsing and her team at Southern California Library, Dr. Becky Chalker, Jonathan Roberts, Jim Aspom, Odelia Rubin, Alice Kors, the Zuckerman family, and Joseph Lovell Wilson.

    Recent Episodes from Science Vs

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?

    Mind-Blowing Orgasms: Does the Male G-Spot Exist?
    We’re hearing stories of people having amazing, cosmic orgasms. So what buttons are they pressing to do this?? Well, it's just one. The “male G spot,” also called the “P spot,” because that P stands for prostate. Word on the street is that if you touch your prostate in just the right way — BAM — one helluva orgasm. But is that really true? And if you don't have a prostate (ahem, me): are you stuck with your garden variety orgasms? To get to the bottom of this, Science Vs surveyed almost 16,000 people about anal sex and masturbation! We also speak with Dr Dan Dickstein, Dr Tom Gaither and Neuroscientist Dr Nan Wise. Have an idea for a Science Vs episode? Let us know! On Instagram we're Science_Vs, Wendy's Tiktok is @wendyzukerman and our email is sciencevs@gimletmedia.com Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsMind-BlowingOrgasms In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Absolutely cosmic orgasms (04:47) Anal sex is big right now (08:52) What makes the prostate special (12:02) The hole story. The butthole story. (20:19) How to get a cosmic orgasm (29:19) Tips and tricks for great anal sex (34:54) The real G spot This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. A huge thank you to Sam Levang for her help analyzing our data. And Professor Caroline Pukall and Dan Dickstein for your help with our survey questions. Thanks to the researchers we spoke to including Dr Devon Hensel. Thanks to Jack Weinstein, Hunter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 20, 2024

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?

    Protein: Are You Getting Enough?
    Protein influencers are big right now, telling us that we're probably missing out on the protein we need — and giving us a bunch of hacks for getting it. Why? They say that eating extra protein helps us build muscle, feel full, and lose weight. So is that true? We talk to kinesiology professor Stuart Phillips and nutrition professor Faidon Magkos.  Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsPROTEIN In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Protein is all the rage right now (02:53) Why protein matters (05:32) How much protein is enough? (11:33) Do you need more protein if you’re working out? (15:06) Is it risky to eat a LOT of protein? (18:46) Should you pound protein right after a workout? (23:09) Protein and weight loss This episode was produced by Rose Rimler and Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Prof. Brad Schoenfeld and Dr. Nicholas Burd. And special thanks to the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 13, 2024

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot

    Introducing The Journal: Trillion Dollar Shot
    Today we’re presenting Trillion Dollar Shot, a new series that explores the business story behind the rise of Ozempic and other blockbuster drugs being used for weight loss. The first episode focuses on the Novo Nordisk scientist who invented the compound that paved the way for Ozempic. You can find every episode on The Journal’s show feed. Trillion Dollar Shot is part of The Journal, which is a co-production of Spotify and the Wall Street Journal. This episode was hosted by Jessica Mendoza, with Bradley Olson. It was produced by Matt Kwong, with help from Jeevika Verma. Additional production from Adrienne Murray Nielsen. The series is edited by Katherine Brewer. Sound design and mixing by Peter Leonard. Mixing for Science Vs by Bobby Lord. Music in this episode by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Theme music by So Wylie, remixed for this series by Peter Leonard. Special thanks to Maria Byrne, Stefanie Ilgenfritz, Kate Linebaugh, Peter Loftus, Sara O’Brien, Enrique Perez De La Rosa, Sarah Platt, Sune Rasumssen, Jonathan Sanders, Nathan Singhapok, Leying Tang, Rolfe Winkler, Liz Essley Whyte, and Tatiana Zamis. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 11, 2024

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?

    Trans Kids’ Healthcare: Are We Getting It Wrong?
    Health care for trans kids has been in the spotlight, with battles over what the science says and tons of U.S. states restricting the care that children can get. And then there’s a new report out of the UK, called the Cass Review, saying that a bunch of the evidence that doctors have been relying on to treat trans kids is “remarkably weak.” So what’s going on here? What is the best health care for trans kids? We sort through the science with Professor Stephen Russell, Dr. Cal Horton, and Dr. Ada Cheung. UPDATE 6/6/24: In a previous version of this episode, we said a study was published this year, when it was actually published last year. The episode has been updated. Mental health resources, including suicide lifelines, for around the world: spotify.com/resources Trans Lifeline: A Trans peer support hotline: 1-877-565-8860 Trevor Project: crisis support services to LGBTQ young people: Call 1-866-488-7386 or Text ‘START’ to 678-678 Find our transcript here: bit.ly/ScienceVsTransKidsCassReviewTranscript  Here are links to our previous episodes about the science of being transgender and misinformation about care for trans kids. In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over care for trans kids (02:45) What to do when a kid wants to change their name and pronouns (13:44) Do puberty blockers help trans kids’ mental health? (20:44) Does hormone therapy help trans people’s mental health? (25:25) How often are people "retransitioning"? This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang and Rose Rimler. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Eva Dasher. Consulting by Rebecca Kling. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to all the researchers we spoke with for this episode, including Blake Cavve, Dr. Doug VanderLaan, and Dr. Quinnehtukqut McLamore. And a very special thanks to the trans folks and their families we talked to, Christopher Suter, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enJune 06, 2024

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup

    The Great Dinosaur Smashup
    More than 150 years ago, just before dino-mania struck, New York City was supposed to get a majestic dinosaur museum full of amazing models of dinos. There would have been nothing like it in the world. Until a bunch of thugs showed up with sledgehammers and smashed every bit of the models to smithereens — and buried it all in Central Park. Today we’re finding out what happened — and WHY. We speak with doctoral researcher Vicky Coules and paleontologist Carl Mehling. SURVEY!! HELP US SCIENCE!! WE NEED YOUR HELP TO UNCOVER THE LAST MYSTERIES OF SEX https://bit.ly/ScienceVsSurvey Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheGreatDinosaurSmashup In this episode, we cover: (00:00) ​​The amazing dino museum we didn’t get to have (03:15) What we knew about dinos in the 1800s (04:57) The famous Crystal Palace dinosaurs (06:48) The plan for the Paleozoic Museum is born (10:40) The Great Dinosaur Smashup of 1871 (12:52) Suspect No. 1: Boss Tweed (17:58) Vicky cracks the case! (26:17) One final mystery — where are the dino pieces?? This episode was produced by Blythe Terrell with help from Wendy Zukerman, R.E. Natowicz, Michelle Dang, Meryl Horn, Rose Rimler and Joel Werner. Editing by Wendy Zukerman. Fact checking by Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks so much to everyone we spoke to about this episode, including Gowan Dawson, Robert Peck, Wendy Anthony and Jessica M. Lydon. Also thanks to Jack Weinstein, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 30, 2024

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?

    The Abortion Pill: How Dangerous Is It Really?
    The Abortion Pill is now the most common way to have an abortion in the US. Yet what exactly happens when you take these pills is shrouded in mystery. Even many doctors don't know how well they work! Today, we're letting the sun shine on the abortion pill. We'll walk you through what happens when you take these pills: what they do to your body, and how safe are they for your physical and mental health? To explore all this - and more - we speak to Dr Sara Whitburn, Professor Oskari Heikinheimo, and Professor Ushma Upadhyay. Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTheAbortionPiill The Abortion Project's Instagram @theabortionproject Science Vs's Instagram @science_vs If you want to talk to someone - there's some great resources in here: spotify.com/resources In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The battle over the abortion pill  (04:28) How does the abortion pill work?  (09:05) How it feels to take the abortion pill (14:34) How often do people hemorrhage? (21:22) What's "normal" bleeding?  (24:11) Does taking the abortion pill affect your mental health?  (32:02) Why some people prefer the abortion pill This episode was produced by Meryl Horn and Wendy Zukerman, with help from Rose Rimler, and Michelle Dang. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord, Emma Munger, So Wylie, Bumi Hidaka and Peter Leonard. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr. Tiffany Green, Dr. Ned Calonge, Professor Jenny Higgins, Dr. Daniel Aaron, Dr. Beverly Winikoff, and Dr. Abigail Aiken. Also thanks to Lauren Silverman, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 23, 2024

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?

    What the Hell Is at the Edge of Space?
    With the powers of the James Webb Space Telescope, scientists discovered some super weird things in the early Universe, and it's making some nerds question our theory of everything.  This story comes to us from our friends at Unexplainable at Vox Media. Find Unexplainable’s transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsUnexplainable In this episode, we cover: (0:00) Liftoff (01:10) The James Webb Space Telescope  (04:57) Party of the early universe  (08:39) Mysteries of the early galaxies  (15:23) How do we figure it out? This episode was produced by Brian Resnick, with help from Noam Hassenfeld and Meradith Hoddinott, who also manages the Unexplainable team. Editing from Jorge Just, music from Noam, and mixing and sound design from Cristian Ayala. Fact checking from Kelsey Lannin. Mandy Nguyen is searching for new forms of life. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices
    Science Vs
    enMay 16, 2024

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky

    Heartbreak: Why It Feels So Achy Breaky
    Getting your heart broken sucks — and for some of us, it even feels physically painful. So why does it hurt so bad? And what can science tell us about how to get over it? We dive into all of this with neuroscientist Prof. Lucy Brown.  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsHeartbreak In this episode, we cover: (00:00) Heartbreak sucks (07:17) What heartbreak does in the brain (12:14) What heartbreak does in the body (15:07) How to get over heartbreak  The episode does mention abuse. Here are some resources if you’re struggling to move on from abuse:  https://resources.byspotify.com/ https://www.loveisrespect.org/resources/why-am-i-struggling-to-move-on-after-abuse/ This episode was produced by Michelle Dang, with help from Wendy Zukerman, Rose Rimler, Meryl Horn, Kaitlyn Sawrey and Lexi Krupp. Editing by Caitlin Kenney and Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Diane Kelly and Erica Akiko Howard. Mix and sound design by Peter Leonard and Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, and Bobby Lord. A huge thanks to all the scientists we got in touch with for this episode, including Professor Larry Young, Professor Tiffany Field, Professor Ethan Kross, Professor Sandra Langeslag, and Professor Naomi Eisenberger. Thanks to Lori Segal. A special thanks to the Zukerman family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes

    Tig Notaro Shares Her Favorite Jokes
    Comedian Tig Notaro, who just released her fifth comedy special, "Hello Again," joins us for a chat about the science of her comedy: telling us how she builds jokes, and of course sharing a bunch of dumb and fabulous jokes. Enjoy!  Here's our Funniest Joke in the World Episode!!  Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsTigNotaro In this episode, we cover: (00:00) We're interviewing Tig!  (01:22) I could be a comedian?  (02:47) How Tig creates a joke  (08:59) The element of surprise (12:27) The world's funniest joke? (13:55) Tig's favorite jokes This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Bobby Lord and Bumi Hidaka.  Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Funniest Joke in the World

    The Funniest Joke in the World
    If you Google "The Funniest Joke in the World," you'll be very disappointed. The internet might serve you something like, "What has many keys but can't open a single lock??” (Answer: A piano). Screw that. That's not funny. Enter Science Vs. We’re going on a romp to find out once and for all: What is the funniest joke in the world. According to science. And for this quest we've interviewed a bunch of amazing comics including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Dr Jason Leong, Loni Love, as well as special guest Latif Nasser of Radiolab and, of course, some scientists: Neuroscientist Professor Sophie Scott and Psychologist Professor Richard Wiseman. Which Joke Will Win???    Find our transcript here: https://bit.ly/ScienceVsFunniestJoke In this episode, we cover: (00:00) The Quest Begins (08:40) Why laughing matters (13:13) The scientific search for the world's funniest joke (17:40) Woof, quack or moo? (21:33) The comedy K (26:30) Do different cultures have different senses of humour? (28:27) The winner! (32:15) Scientific theories of humour (lol) (38:28) Why the winning joke isn't funny (40:26) How do you stop a dog from humping your leg?  (44:43) Meet the comedy gods This episode was produced by Wendy Zukerman, with help from Michelle Dang, Joel Werner, Rose Rimler and Meryl Horn. We’re edited by Blythe Terrell. Fact checking by Sarah Baum. Mix and sound design by Bobby Lord. Music written by Peter Leonard, Bumi Hidaka, Emma Munger, So Wylie, and Bobby Lord. Thanks to all the researchers we spoke to including Dr Andrew Farkas, Professor Penny MacDonald, Dr Maggie Prenger and a huge thank you to Professor Chris Westbury for sharing your amazing spreadsheet!! Thanks to all the comedians we interviewed in this episode including Tig Notaro, Adam Conover, Loni Love, Takashi Wakasugi, Urooj Ashfaq, Dr Jason Leong, Penny Greenhalgh and Mohammed Magdi. Another big thanks to Lindsay Farber, Roland Campos, Lauren LoGiudice, Andrea Jones-Rooy and the other comics at The Joke Lab; and all the comics that we spoke to and couldn't fit into the episode, we really really appreciate you and your time! Thanks to Ben Milam, the Melbourne International Comedy Festival, Stupid Old Studios, Paige Ransbury, the Zukerman Family and Joseph Lavelle Wilson. Science Vs is a Spotify Studios Original. Listen for free on Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts. Follow us and tap the bell for episode notifications.  Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Trump’s ANNOUNCEMENT instantly BLOWS UP in his FACE

    Trump’s ANNOUNCEMENT instantly BLOWS UP in his FACE
    MeidasTouch host Ben Meiselas reports on how Donald Trump’s announcement instantly backfired on him and the Republican Party with the Arizona Supreme Court ruling. Head to https://policygenius.com/MEIDAS to get your free life insurance quotes and see how much you could save. Visit https://meidastouch.com for more! Remember to subscribe to ALL the MeidasTouch Network Podcasts: MeidasTouch: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/meidastouch-podcast Legal AF: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/legal-af The PoliticsGirl Podcast: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-politicsgirl-podcast The Influence Continuum: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-influence-continuum-with-dr-steven-hassan Mea Culpa with Michael Cohen: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/mea-culpa-with-michael-cohen The Weekend Show: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/the-weekend-show Burn the Boats: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/burn-the-boats Majority 54: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/majority-54 Political Beatdown: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/political-beatdown Lights On with Jessica Denson: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/lights-on-with-jessica-denson On Democracy with FP Wellman: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/on-democracy-with-fpwellman Uncovered: https://www.meidastouch.com/tag/maga-uncovered Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    The Hidden Cost of the Texas Abortion Ban

    The Hidden Cost of the Texas Abortion Ban
    Texas’ new abortion legislation has been hotly debated since it was announced earlier this month. What’s beyond debate is that this legislation will hurt women’s economic freedom and target people in lower socioeconomic groups. Today, Nicole breaks down the financial implications of the headlines, and how you can make your voice heard. If you'd like to learn how to get in touch with your local representative, click here: https://www.house.gov/representatives/find-your-representative Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.comSee omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    The Mexican Model of Abortion Rights

    The Mexican Model of Abortion Rights

    When the Supreme Court decriminalized abortion with Roe v. Wade, it established the United States as a global leader on abortion rights, decades ahead of many other countries. 

    Now, with Roe likely to be overturned, we look to Mexico, a country where the playbook for securing legalized abortion could be a model for activists in the United States. 

    Guest: Natalie Kitroeff, a correspondent covering Mexico, Central America and the Caribbean for The New York Times.

    Want more from The Daily? For one big idea on the news each week from our team, subscribe to our newsletter

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday. 

    "Fighting Back Post-Roe."

    "Fighting Back Post-Roe."

    Hysteria host Erin Ryan joins the pod to discuss the political fight to restore abortion access in America, and how Democrats should confront the activist Supreme Court. Then later, Amy Hagstrom Miller from Whole Woman’s Health talks about how abortion providers will continue to serve patients among a challenging patchwork of state laws.

     

    For a closed-captioned version of this episode, click here. For a transcript of this episode, please email transcripts@crooked.com and include the name of the podcast.