Podcast Summary
Dealing with Media Matters: A Challenge for Conservative Commentators: Media Matters, a left-leaning organization, targets conservative commentators, sending out clips with negative commentary. Some hosts, like Dan Bongino, use these clips to promote their shows, angering Media Matters. Preparation is crucial for conservative commentators to handle such tactics.
Entering the conservative commentary business comes with its challenges, one of which is dealing with organizations like Media Matters. This group, made up of individuals who can't seem to find real jobs, watch Fox News all day, and stalk specific programs, aim to discredit conservatives. They send out clips of their targets with negative commentary, but some hosts, like Dan Bongino, use these clips to promote their own shows, infuriating the Media Matters team. A recent example involves Dan using their cuts to promote his Monday morning appearances on Fox and Friends. The Media Matters team, in response, had a meltdown. This is just one example of the tactics used by such organizations, making it essential for conservative commentators to be aware and prepared.
Dispute between Speaker and Content Creator and DHS Secretary Replacement: Misinformation can spread quickly, and it's crucial to fact-check and debunk false claims, such as Trump calling immigrants 'animals' which is untrue.
There was a heated dispute between the speaker and Bobby Lewis, a content creator, over the use of each other's content. The speaker used Lewis' videos without his permission, leading to a block on Twitter and accusations of stalking. Meanwhile, Kirsten Nielsen, the former DHS Secretary, was replaced by Trump, resulting in liberal outrage. One common misconception that may arise from this situation is that Trump called immigrants or asylum seekers "animals." However, this is not true. The media has been known to spread misinformation, and it's essential to be prepared to debunk such false claims.
Misconceptions about Trump's remarks on asylum seekers and neo-Nazis: Despite popular belief, Trump did not call asylum seekers animals, but rather MS-13 gang members. Similarly, he did not label neo-Nazis as good people, but condemned their actions during Charlottesville.
There is a significant misconception circulating that President Trump referred to asylum seekers as animals. However, the actual quote from Trump was in reference to MS-13 gang members during a conversation with a sheriff. It's essential to fact-check information from various sources before believing and spreading misinformation. Additionally, there is another common misconception that Trump labeled neo-Nazis as good people during an interview. This claim is also false, as Trump specifically condemned the actions of neo-Nazis during the Charlottesville incident. It's crucial to be aware of these misconceptions and to verify the accuracy of information before sharing it.
Misrepresentation of Trump's comments on neo-Nazis and white nationalists: Politicians like Adam Schiff misrepresent Trump's quotes for political gain, while investigations in Ukraine could potentially reveal significant scandals involving the Bidens.
President Trump's comments about neo-Nazis and white nationalists being "good people" have been misrepresented by figures like Adam Schiff, who have used the quote out of context for political gain. The actual quote from Trump condemns these groups in total, but Schiff and others continue to spread the falsehood. Additionally, there is ongoing investigation in Ukraine regarding evidence of payments made to Hunter Biden and potential involvement of Joe Biden in pressuring Ukrainian prosecutors to drop the case. This story is still developing, but it could potentially be a significant scandal if Joe Biden runs for president. It's important to remember that context matters and not to believe every sensational claim made on cable news without fact-checking.
Ukrainian investigations reveal new allegations of US election interference and corruption: A Ukrainian with information on US election interference and corruption was denied a US visa, potentially involving a US company and prominent Democrats, challenging the narrative of one-sided involvement.
There are ongoing investigations in Ukraine regarding interference in the US election, involving figures connected to both the Democratic Party and the prior pro-Russia regime. A Ukrainian named Coola has information about these matters, including allegations of serious corruption and money laundering, but was blocked from obtaining a US visa by the US ambassador. The investigations may involve a US company with ties to prominent Democrats and potentially illegal payments. The focus on Manafort's dealings with the pro-Russia regime in previous investigations may have overshadowed these new allegations. The implications of these developments could be significant and may challenge the narrative that only one side of American politics has been involved in such issues.
Ukraine investigations may lead to consequences for Democrats: Ongoing probes into Ukraine financial crimes may implicate Democrats, but bureaucratic obstacles hinder info transfer from State Dept and Justice.
According to Dan Bongino, there are ongoing investigations into financial crimes related to Ukraine involving both Ukrainian officials and Democrats. The Democrats may face significant consequences as evidence of their involvement in these crimes comes to light. However, Trump's administration is facing obstacles from bureaucrats in the State Department and Justice who are hindering the transfer of information. Devin Nunes, on Maria Bartiromo's show, added to this story by mentioning several people who allegedly lied to Congress and misled the FISA court. The specific names were not mentioned, but the implications are serious. The situation is not going to end well for those implicated in these investigations. On a separate note, Dan Bongino also promoted Robinhood, an investing app that allows commission-free trading of stocks, ETFs, options, and cryptos, which he uses and recommends.
Russia investigation: Five individuals identified for falsifying FISA info: Five individuals falsely attested to Russia probe info, withheld exculpatory evidence, raising questions about motivations and actions.
There have been criminal referrals made regarding individuals involved in the Russia investigation, specifically regarding false information presented to the FISA court. Five individuals have been identified as being directly involved in this conspiracy, but there could be more. These individuals not only falsely attested to the truth of the information, but they may have also withheld exculpatory evidence. This is a significant development in the investigation and raises questions about the motivations and actions of those involved. Additionally, there have been many whistleblowers coming forward throughout the investigation to help shed light on the situation. Overall, this investigation has been crucial in helping the United States move past this manufactured hoax.
FBI officials tried to verify false info against Trump associates: High-ranking FBI officials may have knowingly signed off on false information to target Trump presidency, involving the Woods File and the dossier, potentially implicating more individuals.
There was an attempt by high-ranking officials in the FBI to sign off on and verify false information against Trump associates, potentially involving the infamous Woods File and the dossier. Nunes implies that there may be more individuals involved, both above and below Peter Strzok, who also signed off on this false information. This is significant because Strzok was a lead investigator in the illicit investigation of the Trump campaign. The false information was used as part of an "insurance policy" to target and potentially damage the Trump presidency. It's important to note that Nunes believes there is exculpatory information that was being hidden and that the situation is much more conspiratorial than previously thought.
Nunes Questions Mueller Team's Knowledge of Hoax Document: Devin Nunes raised concerns about Mueller probe's legitimacy, suggesting team members knew about a hoax document before investigation began
During a recent speech, Devin Nunes implied that members of Robert Mueller's team may have known before Mueller's appointment in May 2017 that they were investigating a hoax. Specifically, Nunes mentioned Andrew Weissmann and Zainab Ahmad, who were briefed about the Steele dossier, a political document paid for by Trump's political opponents, in August 2016. Nunes questioned how these two members of the Department of Justice could then investigate a case based on a document they knew was a hoax. This raises serious concerns about the legitimacy of the Mueller probe and its findings, particularly regarding potential collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia. Nunes has announced his intention to closely examine Mueller's actions and uncover any potential biases or cover-ups.
Mueller hired biased investigators for Russia probe: Mueller hired investigators deeply involved in Russia hoax, only acted when it went public
During the Mueller investigation, FBI agents Peter Stroke and Lisa Page, who were lead investigators involved in the Russia collusion probe, were picked by Mueller despite knowing it was a hoax. They were later fired or left the team when the investigation's text messages were made public. Mueller hired these individuals because they were already invested in the hoax, and he only took action against them when it became public knowledge. This raises questions about the ethics of the Mueller investigation. Bravo Company Manufacturing, on a different note, is a reputable firearms manufacturer that produces top-notch rifles and pistols. Their products are built to military standards and are designed to be used in potentially life-saving situations.
Bravo Company's focus on self-defense vs Government-controlled healthcare: Bravo Company prioritizes quality rifles/pistols & American skills, while govt-controlled healthcare may limit access to doctors & decisions, potentially causing vision loss.
Bravo Company Manufacturing produces high-quality, life-saving rifles and pistols, assembled and tested in America with a focus on people and skills necessary for self-defense. On the other hand, Medicare for all, as advocated by some Democrats, would mean a government-controlled healthcare system where individuals would lose access to their doctors and hospitals, and would have to rely on bureaucrats for healthcare decisions. An article from 2017 describes the negative consequences of government-run healthcare on cataract surgery and vision loss. Personal experiences, such as losing a family member to blindness due to lack of timely treatment, underscore the importance of preserving the ability to make healthcare decisions and access quality care.
Government-run healthcare systems: Recipients, not customers: In government-run healthcare, individuals are recipients, not customers, leading to potential longer wait times and less prioritization of individual needs. Personal financial data shared with the government also comes with risks.
In a government-run healthcare system, where the government serves as the third-party payer, individuals are not considered the customers but rather the recipients of services. This dynamic can lead to longer wait times and less prioritization of individual needs. Conversely, when individuals pay for their own medical services, they hold more power and control in the healthcare system. Additionally, the ongoing debate around President Trump's tax returns highlights the potential risks of sharing sensitive financial information with the government, as history shows that such data can be used for political attacks.
Protecting Privacy and Preventing Endless Investigations: Conservatives should not release tax returns due to past illegal leaks, Democrats' criminal investigations, and ongoing border crisis incentives. Protecting privacy and preventing endless investigations is crucial.
President Trump and conservatives should not release their tax returns to Democrats due to the illegal leaking of sensitive information in the past. The Democrats have engaged in criminal investigations related to tax returns and classified information leaks from the FBI. With the ongoing border crisis, there are incentives for people to illegally bring their children across the border, resulting in the release of parents as well. Changes to the Flores consent decree and deportation rules for countries other than Mexico are necessary to address this issue. Overall, it's crucial for conservatives to protect their privacy and prevent the Democrats from engaging in endless investigations and fabricating process crimes.
