Podcast Summary
Possible hidden voter fraud and FBI texts: The speaker discussed potential voter fraud involving hidden ballots and empty rooms, and shared a video and FBI text that raise questions. Also, a new coffee sponsor was introduced.
If someone were to commit voter fraud, they would likely do so in private, with hidden fraudulent ballots, and count them during an empty room to avoid witnesses. The speaker also mentioned a video that seems to depict such an occurrence in Georgia, and an FBI text about the DNC hack that raises questions. Additionally, the show discussed a new sponsor, Presshouse Coffee, which offers premium, hand-sourced coffees and resources to help coffee lovers grow their knowledge and enjoy coffee in their own homes. The interview with General Flynn from the previous day also received positive feedback.
Suspicious activities during Georgia election counting led to poll watchers being asked to leave and ballots being found in suitcases: During the 2020 Georgia election, ballots were found in suitcases and counted without supervision after poll watchers were asked to leave, raising concerns about potential voter fraud
During the 2020 presidential election in Georgia, there were suspicious activities during the counting of ballots, particularly after poll watchers were asked to leave in the middle of the night. This raised concerns about potential voter fraud. The theory suggests that if someone intended to commit fraud, they would first announce that they were finished counting and then find a reason to ask poll watchers to leave, such as claiming they were going to a party. Once the poll watchers had left, ballots were reportedly found in suitcases and processed through a machine without supervision. While it's unclear if these ballots were fraudulent, the fact that they were counted in secret after poll watchers had been asked to leave is unusual and raises questions about the integrity of the election process.
Allegations of voter fraud in Georgia during 2020 elections: Voter fraud allegations in Georgia include poll watchers being asked to leave during ballot counting, suspicious suitcases of ballots, and a reported water pipe burst incident, but the investigations are ongoing
There are allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Elections, specifically in Georgia, where poll watchers were asked to leave while ballot counting continued against the law. A video has surfaced showing suitcases of ballots being pulled out from under a table during this time. The suspicious behavior, if proven true, could indicate the counting of fraudulent ballots. The media seems unconcerned about these allegations, but many Republicans believe there was voter fraud based on these and other similar incidents. Additionally, there were reports of a water pipe burst that led to a halt in counting, but text messages from those involved suggested it was a minor incident. The authenticity and implications of these allegations are still under investigation.
Georgia Election Integrity Concerns: Call for Signature Audits: Georgia election integrity concerns call for signature audits to ensure validity of ballots. Focus on transparency and finding solutions, not arguments.
There are concerns regarding the integrity of the election process in Georgia, and there is a call for signature audits to ensure the validity of ballots. The media and public figures are urging Governor Brian Kemp to take action and investigate any evidence of irregularities. This issue is important because it could impact the outcome of the January runoff elections for the Senate. The process of matching signatures on ballots to voter registration files is a simple solution to address these concerns. It's important to put pressure on Georgia officials to do the right thing while also ensuring that the Senate seats are not forfeited to the Democrats. There should be a focus on transparency and finding solutions, rather than engaging in unnecessary arguments.
Allegations of voter fraud in 2020 U.S. Presidential Election: Sworn affidavits, videos, and reports of suspicious ballot movements in multiple states are fueling allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election. Georgia Secretary of State urged to conduct a full signature audit.
There are serious allegations of voter fraud in the 2020 U.S. Presidential Election, with sworn affidavits and videos being presented as evidence. Brian Kemp, the Georgia Secretary of State, is being urged to conduct a full signature audit. The speaker also mentioned concerns about the FBI text related to the election. Additionally, there are warnings about online shopping safety during the holiday season and the importance of identity theft protection. A postal subcontractor claimed that over 288,000 completed mail-in ballots were moved from New York to Pennsylvania, and another reported that over 100,000 ballots in Wisconsin were gathered on November 4th to be backdated. These allegations, along with sworn affidavits and videos, are being considered as evidence in the ongoing election disputes.
Consistency in sworn affidavits and interviewing individuals making allegations are key to uncovering election fraud: Checking the consistency of sworn affidavits and interviewing individuals making allegations can help establish the truth in election fraud investigations.
The credibility of sworn affidavits and consistent storytelling are important indicators of truth in investigations into alleged election fraud. During a podcast discussion, it was suggested that interviewing individuals who have made such allegations and checking their consistency in their stories could help establish the truth. Instances of alleged election fraud were discussed, including claims of machine manipulation and postal service malfeasance. The importance of investigating these claims was emphasized, with concerns raised about the lack of action from authorities and the media. A call was made for interviewing the individuals making these allegations to establish the facts. Additionally, Rudy Giuliani's efforts to investigate election fraud were highlighted, with criticism directed towards those who question his integrity without considering the evidence he presents in the form of sworn affidavits.
Questioning election integrity and new FBI documents: A Michigan hearing featured a woman's firm stance on election observations and new FBI texts, but media focus remained limited.
During a hearing, a Michigan lawmaker questioned the integrity of a woman who had sworn she saw suspicious activity regarding the election vote count. However, the woman, who had signed an affidavit stating her observations, was not intimidated and stood firm. Meanwhile, newly declassified documents from the FBI's spying operation against the Trump campaign revealed text messages from an FBI official, Jen Boone, discussing the Carter Page case, which has been dismissed as a hoax. The media has largely ignored this development. The speaker also shared a moment of levity, highlighting a viral video of a woman who refused to be questioned about her election observations and had a "zero hits to give" attitude. Overall, the hearing and the newly declassified documents underscore the importance of transparency and the need to challenge questionable election processes, while also reminding us to find humor in everyday situations.
FBI Agents Refer to Wikileaks Dump as 'Our Guys' but No Proof Russians Exfiltrated DNC Emails: Despite FBI claims of Russian involvement in the DNC hack and email release, there's no concrete evidence that Russians exfiltrated the emails. The term 'our guys' used by FBI agents is unclear, and it casts doubt on the validity of the initial claims.
There's a text exchange between FBI agents discussing the Wikileaks dump of DNC emails, and they refer to the release as "our guys." However, the FBI has consistently claimed that the Russians were behind the hack of the DNC and the subsequent email release. Yet, the company that analyzed the DNC servers, CrowdStrike, has admitted there's no actual proof that the Russians exfiltrated the emails. Therefore, it's unclear who "our guys" refer to, and it raises questions about the validity of the FBI's initial claims regarding Russian involvement in the DNC hack and email release.
Questions about FBI's impartiality in DNC hack investigation: The FBI's investigation into the DNC hack raised concerns due to the previous position of a key witness and conflicting evidence, suggesting the possibility of an inside job.
The executive of CrowdStrike, Sean Henry, who testified that it was not the Russians who exfiltrated the DNC data, held a previous position in the FBI as the Executive Assistant Director of Criminal Cyber Response and Services Branch, under Robert S. Mueller III. This raises questions about the investigation's impartiality and the process of elimination used to determine the source of the DNC hack. The FBI investigators' texts stating that "our guys" did the hack, and the lack of evidence from CrowdStrike that the Russians exfiltrated the data, suggest that it was likely an inside job. The serious note from a listener expressing appreciation for Dan's vulnerability and sharing his personal struggles during chemotherapy treatment underscores the importance of understanding the human side of public figures.
Personal struggles and listener feedback: Dan shares his gratitude for listener feedback and emphasizes the importance of preparation and self-improvement, particularly in firearm safety and proficiency. He introduces the iTarget Pro and offers a discount for listeners, while also discussing ongoing investigations with caution.
The host, Dan, shared his personal struggles during recent shows and expressed his gratitude for listener feedback. He also highlighted the importance of preparation and self-improvement, particularly in relation to firearm safety and proficiency. Dan introduced the iTarget Pro, a unique tool that allows users to practice shooting in the safety of their own homes, and offered a discount for listeners. Additionally, Dan discussed the ongoing investigation into Spygate and shared some positive developments, but urged caution against premature celebrations. Overall, the show emphasized the importance of self-care, preparation, and staying informed.
FBI lawyer altered email to misrepresent Carter Page's status: An FBI lawyer falsified information, leading to investigations and potential consequences in the Russia probe
An FBI lawyer, Kevin Clinesmith, altered an email to misrepresent Carter Page as not being a source for the CIA when he was, leading to Page's investigation during the Russia probe. Clinesmith is now facing prison time for his actions, and Special Counsel John Durham is pushing for a sentence at the upper end of the guidelines. Despite Clinesmith's claims that he believed he was conveying accurate information, he did not call the CIA officer to clarify the status of Carter Page after being informed of his source status. This deception had significant consequences, including the investigation of Michael Flynn, a Trump campaign advisor. The case highlights the importance of truthfulness and the potential serious consequences of misrepresentations in legal proceedings.
Justice and the Importance of Factual Accuracy: Dorham emphasized the importance of punishing lawbreakers and promoting repentance, while acknowledging the potential for biased reporting in media and the importance of factual accuracy.
During a discussion on a legal case, Dorham expressed his belief that those who break the law should be punished, regardless of the collateral consequences they may face. He emphasized the importance of repentance and forgiveness within the context of a just legal system. The conversation also touched upon the importance of factual accuracy and the potential for biased reporting in media. Additionally, a sponsor message was included, promoting Liquid IV, a hydration product. Overall, Dorham's stance on justice and the potential dangers of biased reporting were the main themes of the discussion.
Social media bias against conservatives: Fact-checks on social media are not always factual and can be used to suppress conservative voices, potentially leading to their removal from the platform.
Social media platforms like Facebook and Twitter have a bias against conservatives and will look for reasons to remove them. These reasons often come in the form of fact-checking, but the fact-checks are not always factual. Instead, they focus on opinions and can be used as strikes against conservative pages, potentially leading to the elimination of the page entirely. For instance, Jen Psaki, who is known to have worn a hammer and sickle hat in a photo, was fact-checked by USA Today, which claimed the photo was missing context. However, the photo is authentic, and the fact-check was not factual. This is part of a larger pattern where social media platforms use fact-checks as a way to diminish the reach of conservative pages and ultimately remove them.
Manipulation of fact-checking for discrediting: Fact-checking can be manipulated to discredit individuals or organizations, even when based on opinions rather than facts. Build alternative platforms to bypass these issues.
The process of fact-checking and the subsequent labeling or removal of content by social media platforms can be manipulated and used to discredit individuals or organizations, even when the fact checks themselves are based on opinions rather than facts. The speaker in this discussion, Dan Bongino, shares his personal experience with this issue, where his Facebook page was fact-checked and ultimately dinged for quoting Nancy Pelosi, leading to mainstream media coverage and further discrediting. He also mentions how fact-checking sites like NewsGuard and Wikipedia can be used to eliminate discredited websites from sourcing, despite their accuracy. The speaker encourages conservatives to be aware of this tactic and to build alternative platforms to bypass these issues. He emphasizes that none of the fact checks on his site have disputed any facts, but rather were based on opinions.
Dan's gratitude for co-hosts and listeners: Dan values his co-hosts' support and authenticity, and appreciates listeners' continued support for the show's emotional depth.
The emotional ups and downs in the podcast "The Dan Pongino Show" serve a purpose. Dan Pongino, the host, expressed his gratitude to his co-hosts Joe and Paula for their support. He mentioned that there are days when he needs their encouragement, while other days he prefers to fly solo. The roller coaster nature of the show is intentional and necessary for its authenticity. Dan acknowledged the importance of his co-hosts in helping him deliver the best content possible. He ended the episode by thanking listeners for their continued support and promising an exciting upcoming week. Overall, the podcast's emotional depth and vulnerability make it relatable and engaging for its audience.
