Podcast Summary
Left's Post-Election Plans: Chaos and Civil Unrest: Prepare for potential food shortages and emergencies as some left-wing groups plan for chaos and civil unrest after the election, encouraging individuals to be self-sufficient.
There are concerns about potential post-election chaos from the left, and some groups are actively planning for it. Dan Bongino has been warning about this and has discussed it on his show and in articles, such as Michael Anton's piece in the American Thinker. The "Transition Integrity Project" and the "Defeat Disinfo Project" are among the groups involved. There have been calls for civil unrest and even talk of a coup if President Trump wins the election. It's important for individuals to prepare for potential food shortages and other emergencies, rather than relying on the government or facing the possibility of starvation. The Dan Bongino Show is the second most popular digital podcast for conservatives, and Bongino encourages listeners to read Anton's piece and consider the potential consequences of the left's post-election plans.
Preparing for Post-Election Chaos: Regardless of the election outcome, be prepared for potential chaos and stay informed to avoid gaslighting tactics.
Regardless of the outcome of the election between Joe Biden and Donald Trump, there will be chaos in the United States. If Biden wins, liberal cities may continue to experience chaos and crime, while under Trump, there may be intense short-term street violence. The speaker emphasizes the importance of being prepared for the chaos, whether it's perpetual under Biden or short-term under Trump. He also mentions the two rules of the left's plans for post-election day chaos: not talking about the conspiracy and blaming the conspiracy on the opponent. The speaker warns against falling for gaslighting tactics and encourages staying informed and prepared for the potential chaos ahead.
Manipulating perceptions through gaslighting: Gaslighting is a tactic used to make people doubt their own reality by lying confidently and repeating falsehoods, often while isolating people from the truth. In political discourse, it can lead to confusion and mistrust, making it important to critically evaluate information and seek out reliable sources.
Gaslighting is a manipulative tactic used to make people doubt their own reality. It involves lying confidently and repeating the lie, often while isolating people from the truth. In the context of political discourse, this can be seen in the way certain narratives are presented, with one side gaslighting the other by asserting falsehoods and attempting to isolate people from the truth. This can lead to confusion and mistrust, making it important to critically evaluate information and seek out reliable sources. For example, in the discussion provided, the speaker highlights instances of media outlets and leftist groups using gaslighting tactics to blame certain groups for violence and chaos, even when there is no evidence to support these claims. By repeating these falsehoods confidently and isolating people from the truth, they are able to manipulate perceptions and sow discord.
Staying Informed and Protecting Privacy are Key: Stay informed by accessing diverse sources and protect your privacy to combat manipulation tactics like gaslighting
In today's world, where information is abundant and diverse, gaslighting as a manipulation tactic is less effective due to the availability of alternative sources. However, efforts are being made by certain entities to isolate people from the truth, such as Facebook and the Chinese government's internet censorship. It's crucial to stay informed and not rely on a single source for news. The speaker emphasized the importance of using tools like ExpressVPN to protect online privacy and securely access information. In essence, staying informed and protecting your privacy are key to combating gaslighting and other manipulation tactics.
Misinformation in Media: The Hill's Inaccurate Tweet: Fact-checking is crucial to avoid misinformation in media reports. The Hill's tweet about Trump supporters without masks was misleading as most were wearing them.
The media, in this case, The Hill, can be inaccurate and misleading in their reporting. They shared a tweet claiming that Trump supporters were gathered without masks, but the photo they used showed everyone wearing masks except for one person. This discrepancy highlights the importance of fact-checking and the potential for misinformation in media reports. Additionally, there are concerns about the cognitive condition of President Joe Biden, according to sources close to him. These issues underscore the need for reliable information and critical thinking in consuming news.
Biden's Cognitive Abilities and Electoral Challenges: Biden's cognitive abilities have raised concerns, with him appearing to struggle in a Q&A session and facing challenges in winning over minority voters, particularly in Florida, which could impact the election outcome.
The cognitive abilities of Joe Biden, the Democratic nominee, have become a serious concern for many, with his rate of change in this area reportedly declining dramatically. This issue has been highlighted in a video of a recent Q&A session, where Biden appeared to be reading answers from a teleprompter and struggled to answer even pre-prepared questions. This has raised questions about his ability to function effectively as the president of the United States. Additionally, Biden is facing significant challenges in winning over minority voters, particularly in Florida, which could have significant implications for the outcome of the 2020 election. The Miami Herald, a left-leaning newspaper, has even started raising concerns about Biden's electoral prospects in this regard. Despite these challenges, Trump only needs to do better in Democratic-leaning counties in Florida to offset possible losses in other parts of the state and potentially win the election.
CIA secretly investigated Trump campaign before FBI probe: The CIA, under John Brennan's direction, conducted a clandestine operation to gather intel on the Trump campaign, possibly using foreign governments and operating outside of US laws, before the FBI's official investigation.
The CIA, under the direction of John Brennan, conducted a secret task force to investigate the Trump campaign before the FBI's official probe, with the goal of gathering information to be fed to the media and potentially influence the election. This task force reportedly operated outside of US spy laws and used foreign governments to conduct their spying. John Brennan has long maintained that he had no knowledge of the dossier or the investigation until after the election, but new evidence suggests otherwise. This revelation is significant as it adds to the ongoing debate about the origins of the Russian collusion hoax and the role of intelligence agencies in American politics. If true, it raises serious questions about the integrity of the intelligence community and the potential for political manipulation.
CIA Director John Brennan briefed President Obama on plans to spy on Trump in July 2016: CIA Director John Brennan enlisted the help of Stefan Halper and Christopher Steele to create a dossier on Trump, which was passed to the FBI in July 2016. He emphasized the involvement of Obama to protect himself if the operation were exposed.
John Brennan, during his tenure as CIA director, briefed President Obama on July 28, 2016, about plans to spy on President-elect Trump using foreign intelligence. He was unable to use official channels due to the potential legal implications of spying on an American citizen, so he enlisted the help of Stefan Halper and Christopher Steele to create a dossier. This dossier was then passed to the FBI on July 31, 2016. The specificity of the date mentioned in Brennan's op-ed, as well as his emphasis on keeping Obama informed, suggests that he was trying to protect himself and implicate Obama in the operation if it were to be exposed. Throughout the rest of the discussion, the speakers emphasized Brennan's specificity about the July 28 date and his attempt to involve Obama in the operation.
Former CIA Director John Brennan's Role in FBI's Russia Probe: Allegations suggest John Brennan orchestrated FBI's Russia probe investigation despite denials, with key events occurring on July 28th, 2016. Further investigation needed to confirm details, but American involvement in upcoming election crucial.
John Brennan, former CIA director, is suspected of orchestrating the FBI's investigation into Russian interference in the 2016 election and Trump's campaign, despite his denials. This is based on the timing of events, including a July 28th meeting between Brennan and President Obama, where he reportedly shared information about Russian interference, and the same day that Lisa Page and Peter Strzok, key FBI investigators, discussed an article about Russian influence in the election. Additionally, the FBI received information from the Steele dossier on the same day. This raises questions about Brennan's involvement and potential efforts to cover his tracks. It's important to note that these are allegations and further investigation is needed to confirm the details. In the meantime, it's crucial for Americans to get involved in the upcoming election and ensure a strong turnout to protect our values and way of life. Join the Job Creators Network's effort to encourage voter participation at keepamericaamerica.com.
Brennan hid his involvement and sources from the FBI during Russia investigation: Former CIA director John Brennan withheld information from the FBI about his role and sources in the Russia investigation, including the dossier, due to distrust and animosity towards then-FBI Director Jim Comey, casting doubt on the investigation's legitimacy
John Brennan, the former CIA director, played a pivotal role in the FBI's investigation into President Trump's alleged collusion with Russia. He hid his involvement and his sources from the FBI, including the infamous dossier from Christopher Steele. This was because of the distrust and animosity between Brennan and then-FBI Director Jim Comey. The evidence, including Lisa Page's testimony under oath, suggests that the FBI and CIA received the same information on July 28, 2016. Despite this, Brennan denied having any knowledge of the dossier until after the election. However, in a recent op-ed, he admitted to having it earlier. The inconsistencies in Brennan's statements and actions raise serious questions about the legitimacy of the Russia investigation and the motivations of those involved.
Former CIA Director John Brennan's Role in the Steele Dossier: John Brennan claimed he learned of the Steele dossier late in 2016, but there are suspicions he obtained the info through his own spying. The dossier did not impact intel community's assessment, but Brennan's involvement remains a subject of controversy.
John Brennan, the former CIA director, claimed he only became aware of the Steele dossier in December 2016, after the election. However, there are suggestions he may have obtained the information through his own spying activities rather than being directly involved in its acquisition. The dossier, which contained allegations of collusion between the Trump campaign and Russia, did not influence the intelligence community's assessment presented to both Obama and Trump. Despite this, Brennan has been accused of orchestrating the entire affair, with some speculating he may have been spying on Trump associates himself. Regardless, the controversy surrounding the dossier and its origins continues to unfold. In other news, tune in for an interview with Devin Nunes and Carter Page on the Spygate special this week, and check out Vincero's sixth anniversary sale for stunning, affordable watches.
Corporations Prioritizing Political Correctness and Alienating Customers: Corporations risk losing customers by prioritizing political correctness over serving the public and shareholders. Focus on customer satisfaction and affordability instead.
Corporations, such as Disney, risk alienating a larger portion of their customer base by prioritizing political correctness and appeasing liberal voices over serving the American public and their shareholders. The discussion also highlighted Vincero Watches' commitment to customer satisfaction and affordability. The speaker expressed disappointment in Disney's decision to acknowledge Chinese Communist Party bureaus in their Mulan remake despite reported human rights abuses, while boycotting Georgia over a heartbeat bill. The advice to corporations was to focus on serving their customers and staying out of politics.
Media's Double Standard in Reporting on Foreign Interference and Biden's China Ties: The media's inconsistent reporting on Trump's Russia ties and Biden's China connections highlights the importance of factual reporting and transparency to maintain public trust.
While former President Donald Trump's comments about Russian interference in the 2016 election were used as a justification for investigations, similar comments made by President Joe Biden about China and his son Hunter's business dealings have received little to no attention from the media or investigative bodies. Despite the clear differences in context and substance, both instances involve potential conflicts of interest and foreign involvement. The media's double standard in reporting on these issues contributes to growing public distrust in the media and highlights the need for transparency and impartiality. The latest polls show that people trust their governors and the CDC more than they trust Trump or the media for information about the coronavirus. It's crucial for journalists to prioritize factual reporting over political biases to maintain credibility and trust with their audiences.
Biden's Inconsistency on National Mask Mandate: Vice President Biden expressed support for a three-month mask mandate but later questioned its constitutionality, showcasing inconsistency on the issue.
Vice President Joe Biden seems to be inconsistent on certain issues, particularly regarding a national mask mandate. During an interview, he expressed his support for a three-month-long mandate, but in another instance, he stated that it might be unconstitutional for the federal government to issue such a mandate. This inconsistency was compared to President Trump's clear stance and consistent messaging on various policies. The discussion also touched upon the comedic aspect of Biden's apparent confusion and inability to maintain a consistent position on certain matters.
Running a renegade program: Despite chaos, Dan Bongino remains committed to delivering content and encourages listener support through subscriptions, reviews, and ratings.
The speaker, Bongino, is expressing his frustration with the chaotic state of his show, admitting that everyone involved is running their own "renegade programs." He acknowledges that it's not even his show entirely anymore and apologizes for any inconsistencies listeners might experience. Despite the challenges, Bongino remains passionate about the show and encourages listeners to subscribe and help spread the word by leaving reviews and ratings on various podcast platforms. This grassroots support is crucial for the show's growth and visibility in the crowded podcast landscape. Ultimately, Bongino promises to continue delivering the content he enjoys and hopes to see everyone again the next day.
