Logo
    Search

    Why Russia Is Rooting for Both Trump and Sanders

    enFebruary 26, 2020

    Podcast Summary

    • Russia interfering in 2020 US election, supporting Trump and SandersUS intelligence reports Russia's interference in 2020 election, backing Trump and Sanders. Sanders kept it private to avoid being perceived as Russia's favorite.

      US intelligence officials have reported that Russia is interfering in the 2020 presidential race by supporting both President Donald Trump and Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders. The intelligence was first shared with Sanders in a confidential briefing about a month ago, but he chose not to speak about it publicly. In a more formal briefing to the House Intelligence Committee on February 13th, the Director of National Intelligence confirmed Russian interference and expressed their preference for Trump. The disclosure of these briefings sparked outrage and accusations of "Russia collusion" from both parties. Sanders, knowing that Trump would use such information to his advantage, remained silent to avoid being perceived as Russia's favorite or dupe in the election. The ongoing Russian interference highlights the need for heightened vigilance and transparency in the election process.

    • Russia accused of supporting Sanders and Trump campaignsIntelligence community accuses Russia of spreading propaganda and false charges on various platforms to support Sanders and Trump campaigns, highlighting the potential power of disinformation in politics.

      During the 2020 presidential campaign, both Bernie Sanders and Donald Trump are facing allegations that Russia is supporting their campaigns. The intelligence community came to this conclusion through various sources, including human sources inside Russia and monitoring Russian networks. The methods used by Russia have evolved since 2016, with Russians now attempting to spread propaganda and false charges on forums like Reddit, which are protected by First Amendment rights. The fact that Russia is trying to help candidates as ideologically different as Sanders and Trump is intriguing, and it highlights the potential power of disinformation in political campaigns. Both Sanders and Trump have reacted angrily to these allegations, with Sanders blaming corporate media and Trump denying the claims outright. Regardless of the motivations behind these allegations, they underscore the importance of being vigilant against disinformation and the potential impact it can have on political campaigns.

    • Russians exploiting US political divisionsRussians amplify divisive issues to create chaos, distract from pressing issues, and weaken US governance and global influence

      The Russians may be exploiting the polarized electorates of both Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders to create chaos and weaken the United States. By amplifying divisive issues on social media, they can make Americans angry at each other and distract from pressing geopolitical issues. The Russians are reportedly more favorable towards Trump and view Sanders as the most beatable Democrat in the 2020 race. This strategy benefits Russia by making the US look incapable of effective governance and weakening its ability to challenge Russian actions on the global stage.

    • Russia's strategic calculations for supporting Trump or SandersRussia may choose to support Trump due to his lenient stance, or Sanders due to his perceived vulnerability, depending on their strategic goals

      Both President Trump and Democratic candidate Bernie Sanders present unique advantages to Russia, and their calculations for supporting either candidate may depend on their strategic goals. While Trump's lenient stance towards Russia aligns with their interests, Sanders' perceived vulnerability to the label of a "Russian loving socialist" could make him an intriguing target. The Russians may believe that Trump would continue his first-term policies, while Sanders could potentially bring about change that might not be in their favor. Ultimately, Russia's decision could be influenced by a combination of factors, including uncertainty about the election outcome and the potential benefits of having a seat at the table with whichever candidate wins.

    • Russia's Role in American Politics and the 2020 ElectionRussia's potential involvement in the 2020 election, whether supporting Trump or Sanders, highlights the need for both parties to address foreign interference in American elections and for voters to stay informed.

      The geopolitical landscape and the role of Russia in American politics continue to evolve, with potential implications for the upcoming presidential election. During the Democratic debate, candidates accused Russia of supporting both Donald Trump and Bernie Sanders, with some suggesting that Moscow favors political extremes and chaos. While the evidence of Russian interference in the 2016 election is clear, the motivations behind any potential support for Sanders are unclear. Some argue that Russia may see Sanders as a weaker opponent to Trump and that his more hostile stance towards Moscow could drive him further to the left, potentially leading to unintended consequences. Others suggest that Russia simply wants to sow discord and chaos in American politics. Regardless of the reasons, it's clear that the role of foreign interference in American elections is a significant concern, and both parties must take steps to address it. Ultimately, it's important for voters to be informed and to consider the potential implications of their choices on the global stage.

    • Presidential debate discusses Putin's involvement in US election and coronavirus threatDuring the debate, Putin's potential support for Trump and interference in the election was addressed, while health officials warned of the imminent coronavirus threat and potential measures to mitigate its impact. Sanders promised to halt Russian interference if elected.

      During a presidential debate, Vladimir Putin was implied to be supporting Donald Trump's campaign and interfering in the election, which was denounced by Bernie Sanders. Meanwhile, health officials warned that the coronavirus is expected to spread in the United States, and preparations should be made for potential measures such as school closures and remote work. Sanders assured Putin that if he becomes president, Russia's interference in American elections will cease. The debate also highlighted the imminent threat of the coronavirus outbreak in the US, with health officials urging Americans to prepare for possible wide-ranging actions. The number of confirmed cases in the US was reported to be 57 as of Tuesday night.

    Recent Episodes from The Daily

    The American Journalist on Trial in Russia

    The American Journalist on Trial in Russia

    Evan Gershkovich, an American journalist for The Wall Street Journal, was detained in Russia more than a year ago. He has been locked up in a high-security prison and accused of spying for the U.S. government.

    His trial, held in secret, is now underway.

    Anton Troianovski, the Moscow bureau chief for The New York Times, discusses the complicated geopolitics behind Mr. Gershkovich’s detention and the efforts to get him home.

    Guest: Anton Troianovski, the Moscow bureau chief for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJuly 03, 2024

    Trump Wins Broad Immunity

    Trump Wins Broad Immunity

    On Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that former President Donald J. Trump is entitled to broad immunity from criminal prosecution for actions that he took while in office.

    Adam Liptak, who covers the Supreme Court for The New York Times, explains how that ruling will weaken the federal case against Mr. Trump for trying to overturn the last U.S. presidential election, and will drastically expand the power of the presidency itself.

    Guest: Adam Liptak, a Supreme Court correspondent for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJuly 02, 2024

    Will Biden Withdraw?

    Will Biden Withdraw?

    President Biden’s disastrous debate performance last week set off a furious discussion among Democratic officials, donors and strategists about whether and how to replace him as the party’s nominee.

    Peter Baker, who is the chief White House correspondent for The Times, takes us inside those discussions and Biden’s effort to shut them down.

    Guest: Peter Baker, the chief White House correspondent for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJuly 01, 2024

    'Animal,' Episode 5: Wolves

    'Animal,' Episode 5: Wolves

    In a broken world, what can we gain by looking another animal in the eye? "Animal" is a six-part, round-the-world journey in search of an answer. In Episode 5, the writer Sam Anderson travels to an obscure memorial in rural Japan: the statue of the last Japanese wolf.

    For photos and videos of Sam's journey to Japan, visit nytimes.com/animal

    The Daily
    enJune 30, 2024

    A Brutal Debate for Biden

    A Brutal Debate for Biden

    In the first debate of the 2024 race, President Biden hoped to make the case that Donald J. Trump was unfit to return to the White House. Instead, Mr. Biden’s weak performance deepened doubts about his own fitness for the job.

    Astead W. Herndon, who covers politics for The Times, explains what happened.

    Guest: Astead W. Herndon, a national politics reporter for The New York Times and the host of the politics podcast “The Run-Up.”

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 28, 2024

    The Doping Scandal Rocking the Upcoming Olympics

    The Doping Scandal Rocking the Upcoming Olympics

    A new doping scandal is rocking the world of competitive swimming, as the Paris Olympics approach. These allegations are raising questions about fairness in the sport and whether the results at the summer games can be trusted.

    Michael S. Schmidt, one of the reporters who broke the story, explains the controversy and what it reveals about the struggle to police doping in sports.

    Guest: Michael S. Schmidt, an investigative reporter for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 27, 2024

    France’s Far Right at the Gates of Power

    France’s Far Right at the Gates of Power

    The far right in France had a big win this month, crushing the party of President Emmanuel Macron in elections for the European Parliament. But the results did not affect France’s government at home — until Mr. Macron changed that.

    Roger Cohen, the Paris bureau chief for The Times, discusses the huge political gamble Mr. Macron has taken, which has brought the far right closer than ever to gaining real power in France.

    Guest: Roger Cohen, the Paris bureau chief for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    • Battered by the far right in voting for the European Parliament, Emmanuel Macron called for new elections in France.
    • The president has challenged voters to test the sincerity of their support for the far right. Were the French letting off steam in the European elections, or did they really mean it?

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 26, 2024

    The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress

    The Plan to Defeat Critics of Israel in Congress

    A powerful group supporting Israel is trying to defeat sitting members of Congress who have criticized the country’s deadly war against Hamas.

    Nicholas Fandos, who covers New York politics for The Times, explains why it appears that strategy may work in today’s Democratic primary in New York.

    Guest: Nicholas Fandos, who covers New York politics and government for The New York Times.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 25, 2024

    The Army of Poets and Students Fighting a Forgotten War

    The Army of Poets and Students Fighting a Forgotten War

    Warning: this episode contains descriptions of injuries.

    Myanmar is home to one of the deadliest, most intractable civil wars on the planet. But something new is happening. Unusual numbers of young people from the cities, including students, poets and baristas, have joined the country’s rebel militias. And this coalition is making startling gains against the country’s military dictatorship.

    Hannah Beech, who covers stories across Asia for The Times, discusses this surprising resistance movement.

    Guest: Hannah Beech, a Bangkok-based reporter for The New York Times, focusing on investigative and in-depth stories in Asia.

    Background reading: 

    For more information on today’s episode, visit nytimes.com/thedaily. Transcripts of each episode will be made available by the next workday.

    The Daily
    enJune 24, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Can Putin’s Disinformation About the Ukraine War Work?

    Can Putin’s Disinformation About the Ukraine War Work?

    For the last three weeks, people around the world have been watching the war in Ukraine unfold on their phones, intimately observing live footage of the conflict’s devastation alongside rampant fake news from Russia claiming the war isn’t real. Disinformation experts Bret Stephens and Julia Davis join Deep Dish to examine why Putin’s narrative isn’t working outside Russia, how long it can dupe the Russian public, and what all of us can do to combat the spread of misinformation.  

    Like this episode? Leave us a review wherever you get your podcasts. 

    BONUS: Conspiracyland S4 EP3 - "It’s Not What We Thought It Was"

    BONUS: Conspiracyland S4 EP3 - "It’s Not What We Thought It Was"

    The third and final installment of the series recounts how senior U.S. officials became increasingly dubious about sensational claims about Havana Syndrome pointing to the lack of any hard evidence that a secret microwave weapon even exists. It features interviews with Fulton Armstrong, former CIA analyst, Jim McGovern, U.S. congressman, Mark Zaid, national security lawyer, and John Cohen, former Department of Homeland Security intelligence chief.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Should Barr be disbarred?

    Should Barr be disbarred?
    Yahoo News White House Correspondent Hunter Walker, Congressman Jamie Raskin, and former Amazon employees Emily Cunningham and Maren Costa join Michael Isikoff and Daniel Klaidman on "Skullduggery." First, Walker takes us through his firsthand witness account of the protesters being cleared out of Lafayette Square for the Trump photo op in front of St. John's Episcopal Church. Then, Raskin walks us through the illegality of what took place at said event. Finally, the Amazon whistleblowers return to talk about what happened during the recent Amazon shareholder meeting as well as the PR stunt dispersed by the company posing as a real news story that was broadcast word-for-word across several local news stations.

    See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    The Ordeal of Jamie Raskin

    The Ordeal of Jamie Raskin
    Jamie Raskin, U.S. Representative from Maryland, joins Michael Isikoff and Daniel Klaidman on "Skullduggery." On New Year's Eve, Raskin learned that his son had taken his own life. While grieving, Raskin, a constitutional law professor and member of the House Judiciary Committee, was determined to do his duty to uphold American democracy. He helped draft two resolutions that passed the House this past week. One to invoke the 25th Amendment. And the other, to impeach President Trump for violating his oath of office.

    See acast.com/privacy for privacy and opt-out information.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.