Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Shifting to plug-and-play automation in a post-pandemic worldCompanies are prioritizing rapid, flexible, and adaptable automation solutions in response to increased uncertainty and volatility in the market. Plug-and-play automation, which requires minimal training time, physical footprint, and can be easily repurposed, is becoming the preferred choice.

      In the post-pandemic world, firms are facing increased uncertainty and volatility, making traditional investment calculus for automation less applicable. As a result, companies are turning towards plug-and-play automation, which can be rapidly bought, delivered, and repurposed, and requires minimal training time and physical footprint. This shift is due to the dynamic market conditions and the need for flexibility and adaptability. Professor Matt Bean, an assistant professor at the University of California, Santa Barbara, and a digital fellow with Stanford's Digital Economy Lab, shares these insights from his recent research on working robots in a post-pandemic world. The article covers e-commerce industries, such as fulfillment warehouses and parcel transport, and highlights the importance of automation that is modular, interoperable, and has a small physical footprint. The changing landscape of automation also has implications for other processes and requires less time, money, and resources for implementation.

    • Adapting to Automation with Simple Robots During DisruptionsDuring disruptions, firms adapt to automation using simple, plug-and-play robots for various tasks, providing quick repurposing and flexibility.

      During times of significant change and disruption, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, firms have been found to adapt constructively to automation not through sophisticated, advanced robotics, but rather through simple, plug-and-play robots. These robots, which can be used for various tasks, including moving fluids of different viscosities, are a good investment for firms as they can be quickly repurposed to meet changing demands. The study, which began before the pandemic, followed eight firms deploying AI-enabled robots for repetitive manual work in warehouses and found consistent trends across various industries and geographies. Contrary to some intuitive stories, it appears that the increase in automation during the pandemic is not driven by advanced robotics replacing existing procedures, but rather by the implementation of simple, underproven, yet reliable and adaptable robots.

    • Navigating the complexities of implementing robotics and AI during COVID-19The integration of robotics and AI technologies during COVID-19 requires significant resources and can impact capacity and delivery capabilities, making justification a challenge. Human flexibility becomes more valuable as firms navigate these complexities.

      The implementation of robotics and AI technologies, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, has become a more complex and challenging process for firms due to the high costs and resources required. This is because setting up these systems often involves stopping traditional production lines, which can significantly impact a company's capacity and delivery capabilities. Additionally, the current economic climate, where demand has increased dramatically, makes justifying such experiments even more difficult. However, it's important to note that this is just the beginning of the conversation around the broader implications of AI-enabled robots for work and employment. The findings from this study suggest that human flexibility has become more valuable in the current context, as firms navigate the complexities of integrating new technologies while continuing to meet customer demands. Stay tuned for more insights on this topic in future research.

    • More jobs and opportunities for growth at the frontlineAmidst social distancing and automation, some organizations have opted for more people, creating new job opportunities and fostering connections for learning and innovation.

      Despite the push towards social distancing and automation in workplaces due to the pandemic, there are opportunities for more jobs and more opportunities for learning and innovation at the frontline. Contrary to popular belief, some organizations have abandoned their automation plans and opted to fill their buildings with more people. This approach, although more costly and challenging to manage, allows for greater adaptability to change and uncertainty. People are excellent at finding new ways to handle unexpected situations and can be motivated to work harder towards new goals. Furthermore, a less automated process allows for more connections between workers, leading to more opportunities for socialization, learning, and innovation. In essence, the pandemic has created more job opportunities and more chances for growth and development in the workplace.

    • Smaller automation systems more effective during crisesIn times of crisis, smaller, simpler automation systems are more adaptable and effective than larger, more complex ones.

      During times of crisis, such as the COVID-19 pandemic, smaller, plug-and-play automation systems have proven more useful than larger, more advanced systems. This finding aligns with the consistent observation in the literature on organizational responses to crisis that complexity and rigidity in technology are hindrances to quick adaptation and change. However, it's important to note that while humans remain crucial in adapting and finding new ways to handle crises, the progress in AI-enabled robotics is significant, even if not yet cost-effective at scale for highly uncertain and dynamic conditions. The intuitively held belief that robotics will eventually handle repetitive manual work reliably in such conditions is valid, but it's essential not to underestimate the current limitations and the stunning progress being made under the hood.

    • Productivity J-curve of new technologiesImplementing new technologies like AI-robots requires significant investment and time before businesses can fully maximize their potential. The optimal solution may not be discovered by everyone at the same time, but early adopters may find innovative ways to use the technology before it becomes widely adopted.

      The implementation of new technologies, such as AI-enabled robots, takes a significant investment of time and resources for businesses to effectively utilize and maximize their potential. This productivity J-curve concept, as discussed in Eric B. Knofsen's paper, has been observed in various forms of automation for over a century. The process of figuring out the best way to use these new technologies can take years, and the maximum utility for firms is achieved much later than expected. However, it's important to note that this doesn't mean that everyone discovers the optimal solution at the same time. Instead, innovative practices and individuals may discover new ways to use the technology earlier, but it takes time for these discoveries to diffuse and become widely adopted. The current study aims to find these innovative practices and individuals by studying a large sample of companies and deployment sites.

    • Understanding the societal implications of advanced technologiesCollecting and analyzing data is crucial to inform theories, policymaking, and ensure desirable future outcomes as technological advancements can follow a J-curve pattern with discontinuous progress

      The implementation and impact of advanced technologies like AI-enabled robotics on employment, work, and society as a whole are subjects of much debate and uncertainty. While there have been some studies, we lack sufficient data to make informed decisions about the societal implications of these technologies. The J-curve phenomenon, where early successes can be followed by discontinuous progress, highlights the importance of collecting and analyzing data to understand the processes through which these technologies are designed, sold, deployed, and used. This information can help inform social science theories, guide policymaking, and ensure that technological advancements move us towards a desirable future rather than away from it. The need for more data-driven research in this area cannot be overstated.

    • Emphasizing the importance of data in AI researchData is essential for informed decisions in AI and robotics. Support studies and build a community for fact-based research.

      Data is crucial in making informed decisions, especially in the field of AI and robotics. Without systematic data sets, decisions are based on assumptions and anecdotes. Professor Bean emphasized the importance of supporting studies and building a community focused on fact-based research. As an AI researcher, he expressed his support for Professor Bean's underground study and the need to make decisions based on actual data rather than mental models or stories. Listeners can find related articles and subscribe to a weekly newsletter at SkanaToday.com. Don't forget to subscribe to the podcast and leave a rating if you enjoy the show. Stay tuned for future episodes.

    Recent Episodes from Last Week in AI

    #172 - Claude and Gemini updates, Gemma 2, GPT-4 Critic

    #172 - Claude and Gemini updates, Gemma 2, GPT-4 Critic

    Our 172nd episode with a summary and discussion of last week's big AI news!

    With hosts Andrey Kurenkov (https://twitter.com/andrey_kurenkov) and Jeremie Harris (https://twitter.com/jeremiecharris)

    Feel free to leave us feedback here.

    Read out our text newsletter and comment on the podcast at https://lastweekin.ai/

    Email us your questions and feedback at contact@lastweekinai.com and/or hello@gladstone.ai

    Last Week in AI
    enJuly 01, 2024

    #171 - - Apple Intelligence, Dream Machine, SSI Inc

    #171 - - Apple Intelligence, Dream Machine, SSI Inc

    Our 171st episode with a summary and discussion of last week's big AI news!

    With hosts Andrey Kurenkov (https://twitter.com/andrey_kurenkov) and Jeremie Harris (https://twitter.com/jeremiecharris)

    Feel free to leave us feedback here.

    Read out our text newsletter and comment on the podcast at https://lastweekin.ai/

    Email us your questions and feedback at contact@lastweekin.ai and/or hello@gladstone.ai

    Timestamps + Links:

    Last Week in AI
    enJune 24, 2024

    #170 - new Sora rival, OpenAI robotics, understanding GPT4, AGI by 2027?

    #170 - new Sora rival, OpenAI robotics, understanding GPT4, AGI by 2027?

    Our 170th episode with a summary and discussion of last week's big AI news!

    With hosts Andrey Kurenkov (https://twitter.com/andrey_kurenkov) and Jeremie Harris (https://twitter.com/jeremiecharris)

    Feel free to leave us feedback here.

    Read out our text newsletter and comment on the podcast at https://lastweekin.ai/

    Email us your questions and feedback at contact@lastweekin.ai and/or hello@gladstone.ai

    Timestamps + Links:

    Last Week in AI
    enJune 09, 2024

    #169 - Google's Search Errors, OpenAI news & DRAMA, new leaderboards

    #169 - Google's Search Errors, OpenAI news & DRAMA, new leaderboards

    Our 168th episode with a summary and discussion of last week's big AI news!

    Feel free to leave us feedback here: https://forms.gle/ngXvXZpNJxaAprDv6

    Read out our text newsletter and comment on the podcast at https://lastweekin.ai/

    Email us your questions and feedback at contact@lastweekin.ai and/or hello@gladstone.ai

    Timestamps + Links:

    Last Week in AI
    enJune 03, 2024

    #168 - OpenAI vs Scar Jo + safety researchers, MS AI updates, cool Anthropic research

    #168 - OpenAI vs Scar Jo + safety researchers, MS AI updates, cool Anthropic research

    Our 168th episode with a summary and discussion of last week's big AI news!

    With guest host Gavin Purcell from AI for Humans podcast!

    Read out our text newsletter and comment on the podcast at https://lastweekin.ai/

    Email us your questions and feedback at contact@lastweekin.ai and/or hello@gladstone.ai

    Timestamps + Links:

    Last Week in AI
    enMay 28, 2024

    #167 - GPT-4o, Project Astra, Veo, OpenAI Departures, Interview with Andrey

    #167 - GPT-4o, Project Astra, Veo, OpenAI Departures, Interview with Andrey

    Our 167th episode with a summary and discussion of last week's big AI news!

    With guest host Daliana Liu (https://www.linkedin.com/in/dalianaliu/) from The Data Scientist Show!

    And a special one-time interview with Andrey in the latter part of the podcast.

    Read out our text newsletter and comment on the podcast at https://lastweekin.ai/

    Email us your questions and feedback at contact@lastweekin.ai and/or hello@gladstone.ai

    Timestamps + links:

    Last Week in AI
    enMay 19, 2024

    #166 - new AI song generator, Microsoft's GPT4 efforts, AlphaFold3, xLSTM, OpenAI Model Spec

    #166 - new AI song generator, Microsoft's GPT4 efforts, AlphaFold3, xLSTM, OpenAI Model Spec

    Our 166th episode with a summary and discussion of last week's big AI news!

    Read out our text newsletter and comment on the podcast at https://lastweekin.ai/

    Email us your questions and feedback at contact@lastweekin.ai and/or hello@gladstone.ai

    Timestamps + links:

    Last Week in AI
    enMay 12, 2024

    #165 - Sora challenger, Astribot's S1, Med-Gemini, Refusal in LLMs

    #165 - Sora challenger, Astribot's S1, Med-Gemini, Refusal in LLMs

    Our 165th episode with a summary and discussion of last week's big AI news!

    Read out our text newsletter and comment on the podcast at https://lastweekin.ai/

    Email us your questions and feedback at contact@lastweekin.ai and/or hello@gladstone.ai

    Timestamps + links:

    Last Week in AI
    enMay 05, 2024

    #164 - Meta AI, Phi-3, OpenELM, Bollywood Deepfakes

    #164 - Meta AI, Phi-3, OpenELM, Bollywood Deepfakes

    Our 164th episode with a summary and discussion of last week's big AI news!

    Read out our text newsletter and comment on the podcast at https://lastweekin.ai/

    Email us your questions and feedback at contact@lastweekin.ai and/or hello@gladstone.ai

    Timestamps + links:

    Last Week in AI
    enApril 30, 2024

    #163 - Llama 3, Grok-1.5 Vision, new Atlas robot, RHO-1, Medium ban

    #163 - Llama 3, Grok-1.5 Vision, new Atlas robot, RHO-1, Medium ban

    Our 163rd episode with a summary and discussion of last week's big AI news!

    Note: apology for this one coming out a few days late, got delayed in editing it -Andrey

    Read out our text newsletter and comment on the podcast at https://lastweekin.ai/

    Email us your questions and feedback at contact@lastweekin.ai and/or hello@gladstone.ai

    Timestamps + links:

    Last Week in AI
    enApril 24, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Perspectives on: Corporate Data Science

    Perspectives on: Corporate Data Science
    Vor mehr als zehn Jahren bezeichnete das Harvard Business Review den Beruf des Data Scientists als "the sexiest job of the 21st century". Zusammen mit der Datenwissenschaftlerin und ISM-Dozentin Dr. Ana Moya wollen wir in dieser Folge von "ISM Perspectives on..." darauf blicken, wie die Situation des Berufstands heute aussieht: Welche Rolle spielen Data Scientists vor dem Hintergrund von KI und zunehmender Automatisierung? Welche neuen Kompetenzen leiten sich daraus ab? Und wie können auch KMUs wissenschaftliche Datenanalysen gewinnbringend in ihre Strukturen integrieren? Das alles und mehr ist Gegenstand der aktuellen Folge.

    Finders Keepers: Real Law

    Finders Keepers: Real Law

    You know that heartbreak of the schoolyard – finders keepers, losers weepers? That’s actual law in a great many grown up places. Enter the murky legal world of finding something that belongs to someone else, from buried treasure to a misplaced ring.

    Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    How This Man Profited $1 Billion Betting on Hong Kong Horse Races

    How This Man Profited $1 Billion Betting on Hong Kong Horse Races
    Bill Benter, is a reserved unassuming and media-shy Pittsburg resident who made almost 1 billion dollars by gambling on horse races. The man was a mathematical genius who was on the cutting edge of both computer science and statistical modeling so it is widely assumed with his business knowledge that he could have made money just about anywhere, in a rare interview when asked about his success in horse racing he said: “I was driven only partly by money, I believe I probably could have made more money in finance, but that didn’t interest me, I didn’t get into professional horse racing because it was hard, but because it was said to be impossible”