Logo

    Dermatology

    en15 Episodes

    People also ask

    What is the main theme of the podcast?
    Who are some of the popular guests the podcast?
    Were there any controversial topics discussed in the podcast?
    Were any current trending topics addressed in the podcast?
    What popular books were mentioned in the podcast?

    Episodes (15)

    Targeting IL-13 in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Forging a New Path to Improved Disease and Patient Outcomes

    Targeting IL-13 in Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Forging a New Path to Improved Disease and Patient Outcomes
    Guest: Terry Faleye, MPAS, PA-C
    Guest: Jonathan I. Silverberg, MD, PhD, MPH

    Atopic dermatitis (AD) significantly impacts physical, social, and psychological well-being. Recently, novel and more effective treatment options have been approved, including those targeting interleukin (IL)-13. Tune in to watch this webcast on incorporating these agents to optimize care for patients with moderate to severe AD with Terry Faleye, Dermatology Physician Assistant at DermSurgery Associates in Houston, Texas, and Dr. Jonathan Silverberg, Professor, Director of Clinical Research, and Director of Patch Testing at George Washington University School of Medicine and Health Sciences in Washington, DC.

    Taking the Patient-Centered Approach to Mycophenolate Risk Mitigation

    Taking the Patient-Centered Approach to Mycophenolate Risk Mitigation
    Guest: Cara Dolin, MD
    Guest: Jennifer Simpson
    Guest: Diana Girnita, MD ,PhD

    Explore this video roundtable featuring an interdisciplinary panel of experts discussing a woman’s journey with mycophenolate therapy and strategies to approach risk mitigation. Learn more about how to provide critical education on the risks of mycophenolate, the importance of effective contraception, and navigating family planning.

    Opening Statements in the Case of Targeted Versus ICI Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Melanoma

    Opening Statements in the Case of Targeted Versus ICI Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Melanoma
    Host: Jeffrey S. Weber, MD, PhD
    Host: Ryan Sullivan, MD
    Host: Omid Hamid, MD

    Approximately 50 - 60% of patients with melanoma have BRAF-activating tumors, meaning they are amenable to treatment with combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors. However, immunotherapy is also a highly effective treatment for patients with BRAF-activating tumors. Given the benefit of both types of therapies in the adjuvant setting, there are uncertainties regarding which adjuvant treatment to offer patients with stage III disease. The critical question revolves around which adjuvant treatment strategy provides the best opportunity for sustained recurrence-free survival.

    Report with a jury of your peers to debate the optimal adjuvant treatment approach for a patient with fully resected, stage III BRAF-mutant melanoma. View the persuasive evidence and listen to expert witnesses defend the pros and cons for this high-risk patient population. Cast your polling vote as the case proceeds. We’ll see you in court to render a verdict in an important case with implications for your clinical practice!

    Prosecution: Argument for BRAF/MEK-Targeted Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Melanoma

    Prosecution: Argument for BRAF/MEK-Targeted Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Melanoma
    Host: Omid Hamid, MD
    Host: Sapna Patel, MD
    Host: Ryan Sullivan, MD
    Host: Jeffrey S. Weber, MD, PhD

    Approximately 50 - 60% of patients with melanoma have BRAF-activating tumors, meaning they are amenable to treatment with combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors. However, immunotherapy is also a highly effective treatment for patients with BRAF-activating tumors. Given the benefit of both types of therapies in the adjuvant setting, there are uncertainties regarding which adjuvant treatment to offer patients with stage III disease. The critical question revolves around which adjuvant treatment strategy provides the best opportunity for sustained recurrence-free survival.

    Report with a jury of your peers to debate the optimal adjuvant treatment approach for a patient with fully resected, stage III BRAF-mutant melanoma. View the persuasive evidence and listen to expert witnesses defend the pros and cons for this high-risk patient population. Cast your polling vote as the case proceeds. We’ll see you in court to render a verdict in an important case with implications for your clinical practice!

    Defense: Argument for Single Agent ICI Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Melanoma

    Defense: Argument for Single Agent ICI Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Melanoma
    Host: Jeffrey S. Weber, MD, PhD
    Host: Jason J. Luke, MD, FACP
    Host: Ryan Sullivan, MD
    Host: Omid Hamid, MD

    Approximately 50 - 60% of patients with melanoma have BRAF-activating tumors, meaning they are amenable to treatment with combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors. However, immunotherapy is also a highly effective treatment for patients with BRAF-activating tumors. Given the benefit of both types of therapies in the adjuvant setting, there are uncertainties regarding which adjuvant treatment to offer patients with stage III disease. The critical question revolves around which adjuvant treatment strategy provides the best opportunity for sustained recurrence-free survival.

    Report with a jury of your peers to debate the optimal adjuvant treatment approach for a patient with fully resected, stage III BRAF-mutant melanoma. View the persuasive evidence and listen to expert witnesses defend the pros and cons for this high-risk patient population. Cast your polling vote as the case proceeds. We’ll see you in court to render a verdict in an important case with implications for your clinical practice!

    Closing Arguments in the Case of Targeted Versus ICI Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Melanoma

    Closing Arguments in the Case of Targeted Versus ICI Adjuvant Treatment of Stage III Melanoma
    Host: Jeffrey S. Weber, MD, PhD
    Host: Ryan Sullivan, MD
    Host: Omid Hamid, MD

    Approximately 50 - 60% of patients with melanoma have BRAF-activating tumors, meaning they are amenable to treatment with combination BRAF/MEK inhibitors. However, immunotherapy is also a highly effective treatment for patients with BRAF-activating tumors. Given the benefit of both types of therapies in the adjuvant setting, there are uncertainties regarding which adjuvant treatment to offer patients with stage III disease. The critical question revolves around which adjuvant treatment strategy provides the best opportunity for sustained recurrence-free survival.

    Report with a jury of your peers to debate the optimal adjuvant treatment approach for a patient with fully resected, stage III BRAF-mutant melanoma. View the persuasive evidence and listen to expert witnesses defend the pros and cons for this high-risk patient population. Cast your polling vote as the case proceeds. We’ll see you in court to render a verdict in an important case with implications for your clinical practice!

    Opening Statements in the Case of Anti-CTLA-4-based Versus Anti-LAG3-based Frontline Combination ICI Treatment of Stage IV Melanoma

    Opening Statements in the Case of Anti-CTLA-4-based Versus Anti-LAG3-based Frontline Combination ICI Treatment of Stage IV Melanoma
    Host: Jeffrey S. Weber, MD, PhD
    Host: Sapna Patel, MD
    Host: Jason J. Luke, MD, FACP

    Despite improved prognosis for melanoma patients due to advances in treatment options in recent years, survival rates for patients with metastatic disease remain low. With two mechanistically different immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations available, it is critical that clinicians be able to differentiate among currently approved regimens to inform frontline treatment selection in different patient populations. The crucial question revolves around which target, anti-CTLA-4 versus anti-LAG3, provides the greatest benefit in metastatic melanoma when combined with a PD-1 inhibitor.

    Report with a jury of your peers to debate the optimal frontline treatment approach for a patient with unresectable stage IV BRAF-wild type melanoma. View the persuasive evidence and listen to expert witnesses defend the pros and cons for this vulnerable patient population. Cast your polling vote as the case proceeds. We’ll see you in court to render a verdict in an important case with implications for your clinical practice!

    Prosecution: Argument for Anti-CTLA-4-based Frontline Combination ICI Treatment of Stage IV Melanoma

    Prosecution: Argument for Anti-CTLA-4-based Frontline Combination ICI Treatment of Stage IV Melanoma
    Host: Jeffrey S. Weber, MD, PhD
    Host: Sapna Patel, MD
    Host: Omid Hamid, MD
    Host: Jason J. Luke, MD, FACP

    Despite improved prognosis for melanoma patients due to advances in treatment options in recent years, survival rates for patients with metastatic disease remain low. With two mechanistically different immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations available, it is critical that clinicians be able to differentiate among currently approved regimens to inform frontline treatment selection in different patient populations. The crucial question revolves around which target, anti-CTLA-4 versus anti-LAG3, provides the greatest benefit in metastatic melanoma when combined with a PD-1 inhibitor.

    Report with a jury of your peers to debate the optimal frontline treatment approach for a patient with unresectable stage IV BRAF-wild type melanoma. View the persuasive evidence and listen to expert witnesses defend the pros and cons for this vulnerable patient population. Cast your polling vote as the case proceeds. We’ll see you in court to render a verdict in an important case with implications for your clinical practice!

    Defense: Argument for Anti-LAG3-based Frontline Combination ICI Treatment of Stage IV Melanoma

    Defense: Argument for Anti-LAG3-based Frontline Combination ICI Treatment of Stage IV Melanoma
    Host: Jeffrey S. Weber, MD, PhD
    Host: Jason J. Luke, MD, FACP
    Host: Ryan Sullivan, MD
    Host: Sapna Patel, MD

    Despite improved prognosis for melanoma patients due to advances in treatment options in recent years, survival rates for patients with metastatic disease remain low. With two mechanistically different immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations available, it is critical that clinicians be able to differentiate among currently approved regimens to inform frontline treatment selection in different patient populations. The crucial question revolves around which target, anti-CTLA-4 versus anti-LAG3, provides the greatest benefit in metastatic melanoma when combined with a PD-1 inhibitor.

    Report with a jury of your peers to debate the optimal frontline treatment approach for a patient with unresectable stage IV BRAF-wild type melanoma. View the persuasive evidence and listen to expert witnesses defend the pros and cons for this vulnerable patient population. Cast your polling vote as the case proceeds. We’ll see you in court to render a verdict in an important case with implications for your clinical practice!

    Closing Arguments in the Case of Anti-CTLA-4-based Versus Anti-LAG3-based Frontline Combination ICI Treatment of Stage IV Melanoma

    Closing Arguments in the Case of Anti-CTLA-4-based Versus Anti-LAG3-based Frontline Combination ICI Treatment of Stage IV Melanoma
    Host: Jeffrey S. Weber, MD, PhD
    Host: Sapna Patel, MD
    Host: Jason J. Luke, MD, FACP

    Despite improved prognosis for melanoma patients due to advances in treatment options in recent years, survival rates for patients with metastatic disease remain low. With two mechanistically different immune checkpoint inhibitor combinations available, it is critical that clinicians be able to differentiate among currently approved regimens to inform frontline treatment selection in different patient populations. The crucial question revolves around which target, anti-CTLA-4 versus anti-LAG3, provides the greatest benefit in metastatic melanoma when combined with a PD-1 inhibitor.

    Report with a jury of your peers to debate the optimal frontline treatment approach for a patient with unresectable stage IV BRAF-wild type melanoma. View the persuasive evidence and listen to expert witnesses defend the pros and cons for this vulnerable patient population. Cast your polling vote as the case proceeds. We’ll see you in court to render a verdict in an important case with implications for your clinical practice!

    Preventing Disease Recurrence with Adjuvant Therapy in Stage IIB/IIC Melanoma

    Preventing Disease Recurrence with Adjuvant Therapy in Stage IIB/IIC Melanoma
    Host: Jason J. Luke, MD, FACP
    Guest: Tara C. Mitchell, MD

    The 5-year recurrence rates for stage IIB and IIC melanoma are up to 46%, but now new immunotherapy options are FDA-approved for the adjuvant treatment of stage IIB and IIC melanoma. Find out why this matters and hear Drs. Jason Luke and Tara Mitchell break down the latest data on treating stage IIB and IIC melanoma with adjuvant immunotherapy.

    Combining Biologics in a Young Patient with Atopic Dermatitis

    Combining Biologics in a Young Patient with Atopic Dermatitis
    Guest: Peter A. Lio, MD
    Guest: Mark Boguniewicz, MD
    Guest: Eric Simpson, MD, MCR

    Please note: This activity is no longer available for continuing education credit.

    Tune in as a multidisciplinary panel discusses a clinician's question about the appropriateness of combining two biologics in a very young child with several atopic diseases.

    Using a Biologic in a Patient with Atopic Dermatitis and HSV Keratitis

    Using a Biologic in a Patient with Atopic Dermatitis and HSV Keratitis
    Guest: Peter A. Lio, MD
    Guest: Mark Boguniewicz, MD
    Guest: Eric Simpson, MD, MCR

    Please note: This activity is no longer available for continuing education credit.

    A multidisiplinary panel is presented with a highly allergic, extremely refractory patient with atopic dermatitis. Her dermatologist wants to take the next step and start her on a biologic, but she's worried about the patient's occular history and dupilumab's conjunctivitis risk. Find out what the experts have to say about this doctor's dilemma.

    Options for an Infant with Atopic Dermatitis

    Options for an Infant with Atopic Dermatitis
    Guest: Peter A. Lio, MD
    Guest: Mark Boguniewicz, MD
    Guest: Eric Simpson, MD, MCR

    Please note: This activity is no longer available for continuing education credit.

    Infants have the highest incidence of atopic dermatitis in the US but the fewest treatment options. This is a case a doctor submitted about a baby who is refractory to multiple oral and topical treatments. A multidisciplinary panel discusses how they would approach the baby's treatment, emerging options for this vulnerable patient population, and if anything can be done now to prevent progression of the atopic march later.

    Advances in the Management of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis

    Advances in the Management of Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis
    Host: Peter A. Lio, MD
    Guest: Eric Simpson, MD, MCR
    Guest: Mark Boguniewicz, MD

    Please note: This activity is no longer available for continuing education credit.

    “I begged my doctor for something else – there had to be something else,” Pam.

    For over 50 years, Pam suffered with uncontrolled moderate-to-severe atopic dermatitis (AD). She experienced the evolution of treatment strategies over the course of the several decades, trying everything from topicals to off-label targeted systemic agents. She was willing to try anything to make the unbearable itch go away. In this roundtable discussion, we brought Pam and her dermatologist to discuss AD with a multidisciplinary physician panel. Together they weigh in on experimental and newly approved therapies, management strategies, impact on quality-of-life, and shared decision-making techniques, all supplemented by Pam’s unfiltered, down-to-earth reality check of what life with AD and all these drugs really feels like.

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io