Logo

    ask stago

    Explore "ask stago" with insightful episodes like "#15 Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) and fibrin related markers", "#14 How to be more productive (Part. 3): Workcell", "#13 The Lupus Anticoagulant diagnosis work up", "#12 How to be more productive (Part. 2): the Lean and the Six sigma" and "#11 – Monitoring of UFH: APTT or Anti-Xa?" from podcasts like ""Ask Stago (english version)", "Ask Stago (english version)", "Ask Stago (english version)", "Ask Stago (english version)" and "Ask Stago (english version)"" and more!

    Episodes (46)

    #15 Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) and fibrin related markers

    #15 Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) and fibrin related markers

    Welcome to Ask Stago, the weekly podcast for Hemostasis laboratory professionals.   

    This week, with our expert Paul Riley, Scientific Business Development Manager, Cécile Hourquet and Audrey Carlo will cover the usage of fibrin related markers in the diagnosis of disseminated intravascular coagulopathy.   

     

    Litterature: 

    • Baglin T. Disseminated intravascular coagulation: diagnosis and treatment. BMJ 1996; 312: 683-7 
    • Iba T, Di Nisio M, Thachil J, Wada H, Asakura H, Sato K, Kitamura N, Saitoh D. Revision of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) diagnostic criteria using antithrombin activity. Crit Care. 2016 Sep 14;20:287 
    • Taylor FB Jr, Toh CH, Hoots WK, Wada H, Levi M; Scientific Subcommittee on Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation (DIC) of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis (ISTH). Towards definition, clinical and laboratory criteria, and a scoring system for disseminated intravascular coagulation. Thromb Haemost. 2001 Nov;86(5):1327-30 
    • JAAM; Iba T, Di Nisio M, Thachil J, Wada H, Asakura H, Sato K, Kitamura N, Saitoh D. Revision of the Japanese Association for Acute Medicine (JAAM) disseminated intravascular coagulation (DIC) diagnostic criteria using antithrombin activity. Crit Care. 2016 
    • Sep 14;20:287 
    • Boral BM, Williams DJ, Boral LI. Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. Am J Clin Pathol 2016; 146: 670-80 
    • Wada H, Sakuragawa N. Are fibrin-related markers useful for the diagnosis of thrombosis? Semin Thromb Hemost 2008; 34: 33-8 
    • Toh JMH, Ken-Drorb G, Downey D, Abram ST. The clinical utility of fibrin-related biomarkers in sepsis Blood Coagulation and Fibrinolysis 2013, 24:00–00 
    • Gris JC, Cochery-Nouvellon E, Bouvier S, Jaber S, Albanese J, Constantin JM, Orban JC, Morel J, Leone M, Deras P, Elotmani L, Lavigne-Lissalde G, Lefrant JY. Clinical value of automated fibrin generation markers in patients with septic shock: a SepsiCoag ancillary study. Br J Haematol. 2018 Nov;183(4):636-647 
    • (Singh N, Prasad Pati H, Tyagi S, Datt Upadhyay A, Saxena R. Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of Fibrin Monomer in Comparison to D-Dimer in Patients With Overt and Nonovert Disseminated Intravascular Coagulation. Clin Appl Thromb / Hemost 2015; 1-6.). 
    • (Park KJ, Kwon EH, Kim HJ, Kim SH. Evaluation of the diagnostic performance of fibrin monomer in disseminated intravascular coagulation. Korean J Lab Med. 2011; 31: 143-7.). 

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Content is scientific and technical in nature. It is intended as an educational tool for laboratory professionals and topics discussed are not intended as recommendations or as commentary on appropriate clinical practice.

    #14 How to be more productive (Part. 3): Workcell

    #14 How to be more productive (Part. 3): Workcell

    Welcome to Ask Stago, weekly podcast dedicated to providing expert answers to your expert questions in coagulation.   

    This week, thanks to their expert Alexandre Rousseaux, Cécile Hourquet and Audrey Carlo will question how to be more productive in the lab using a workcell.

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Content is scientific and technical in nature. It is intended as an educational tool for laboratory professionals and topics discussed are not intended as recommendations or as commentary on appropriate clinical practice.

    #13 The Lupus Anticoagulant diagnosis work up

    #13 The Lupus Anticoagulant diagnosis work up

    Welcome to Ask Stago, the weekly podcast dedicated to providing expert answers to your expert questions in coagulation.   

    This week, with our expert Lisa Gannon, product line manager, Cécile Hourquet and Audrey Carlo will question how to accurately perform an Lupus Anticoagulant diagnosis work up in the laboratory.   

     

    Sources: 

    • Miyakis S, Lockshin MD, Atsumi T, Branch DW, Brey RL, Cervera R, Derksen RH, De Groot PG, Koike T, Meroni PL, Reber G, Shoenfeld Y, Tincani A, Vlachoyiannopoulos PG, Krilis SA. International consensus statement on an update of the classification criteria for definite antiphospholipid syndrome (APS). J Thromb Haemost 2006; 4: 295–306 
    • Devreese KMJ, Ortel TL, Pengo V, de Laat B; Subcommittee on Lupus anticoagulant/Antiphospholipid antibodies. Laboratory criteria for antiphospholipid syndrome: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. J Thromb Haemost 2018; 16: 809-813 
    • CLSI Laboratory testing for the Lupus anticoagulant - Approved Guideline. CLSI document H60-A. Wayne, PA; 2014. 
    • Devreese, KMJ, de Groot, PG, de Laat, B, et al. Guidance from the Scientific and Standardization Committee for lupus anticoagulant/antiphospholipid antibodies of the International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis. J Thromb Haemost. 2020; 18: 2828– 2839. https://doi.org/10.1111/jth.15047 
    • V. Chantarangkul, F. Peyvandi, A. Tripodi, et al., Effect of different methods for outlier detection and rejection when calculating cut off values for diagnosis of lupus anticoagulants, Thrombosis Research (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.thromres.2020.03.018
    • CLSI Defining, Establishing and Verifying Reference Intervals in the Clinical Laboratory: Approved guideline Third edition. CLSI document C28-A3- Wayne, PA; 2008 

     

    -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Content is scientific and technical in nature. It is intended as an educational tool for laboratory professionals and topics discussed are not intended as recommendations or as commentary on appropriate clinical practice.

    #12 How to be more productive (Part. 2): the Lean and the Six sigma

    #12 How to be more productive (Part. 2): the Lean and the Six sigma

    Welcome to Ask Stago, The Podcast dedicated to provide expert answers to your expert questions in coagulation. 


    On today’s episode, thanks to our expert Andres Ramirez, discover the part 2 of our series “how to be more productive” with a special episode about Lean and Six sigma workflow analysis.  

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Content is scientific and technical in nature. It is intended as an educational tool for laboratory professionals and topics discussed are not intended as recommendations or as commentary on appropriate clinical practice.

    #11 – Monitoring of UFH: APTT or Anti-Xa?

    #11 – Monitoring of UFH: APTT or Anti-Xa?

    Welcome to Ask Stago, The Podcast dedicated to provide expert answers to your expert questions in coagulation. 

    In our episode this week, we will discuss with François Depasse, our Clinical Development Director, about the monitoring of UFH and the appropriate tool to do it: APTT or anti-Xa activity? 

    Sources:  

    • Johnson EA, Mullboy B. The molecular weight range of commercial heparin preparations. Carbohydr Res 1976; 51: 119-127 
    • Hirsh J, Raschke R, Heparin and Low-molecular-weight heparin : the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and thrombolytic therapy. CHEST 2004; 126 (suppl 3): 188S-203S. 
    • Basu D, Gallus A, Hirsh J, Cade J. A prospective study of the value of monitoring heparin treatment with the activated partial thromboplastin time. N Engl J Med. 1972 Aug 17;287(7):324-7. doi: 10.1056/NEJM197208172870703. PMID: 5041701. 
    • Eikelboom JW, Hirsh J. Monitoring unfractionated heparin with the aPTT: time for a fresh look. Thromb Haemost. 2006 Nov;96(5):547-52. 
    • Frugé KS, Lee YR. Comparison of unfractionated heparin protocols using antifactor Xa monitoring or activated partial thrombin time monitoring. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2015 Sep 1;72(17 Suppl 2):S90-7. 
    • Vandiver JW, Vondracek TG. Antifactor Xa levels versus activated partial thromboplastin time for monitoring unfractionated heparin. Pharmacotherapy. 2012 Jun;32(6):546-58. doi: 10.1002/j.1875-9114.2011.01049.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24. 

    ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Content is scientific and technical in nature. It is intended as an educational tool for laboratory professionals and topics discussed are not intended as recommendations or as commentary on appropriate clinical practice.

    #5 World Thrombosis Day 2020 - Part. 2 Todd

    #5 World Thrombosis Day 2020 - Part. 2 Todd

    Welcome to Ask Stago, The Podcast dedicated to provide expert answers to your expert questions in coagulation. 

    Today episodes are broadcasted from October 13, which is the World Thrombosis Day. Our episodes are thus dedicated to raise awareness about thrombosis symptoms and management, through the interview of 3 “thrombosis survivors”: Debra Bryant, honorable mention recipient of the WTD 2020 Ambassador of the Year Award, Todd Robertson, one of the most active WTD Ambassadors within the US, and Chris Pugh, who lives in the UK and very recently started his "living with a clot" journey.

    Get involved in the WTD movement 
    Follow us on LinkedIn In or Twitter