Logo

    empiricism

    Explore " empiricism" with insightful episodes like "M2E1: It's Super Effective! (Pokémon and Justified True Belief)", "Special Episode 6| Rene Descartes Meditation Three| God and Establishing The Metaphysical Foundation", "Special Episode 5| Rene Descartes Meditation Two| The Mind, Thought and Wax", "Special Episode 4| Rene Descartes Meditation One| Doubt, Dreams and the Evil Deceiver" and "Episode 38: Just Theory (w/ John Jost & Jim Sidanius)" from podcasts like ""Philosophiraga: The Video Games and Philosophy Podcast", "Dissecting Philosophy with Dr McDonald", "Dissecting Philosophy with Dr McDonald", "Dissecting Philosophy with Dr McDonald" and "Tatter"" and more!

    Episodes (53)

    M2E1: It's Super Effective! (Pokémon and Justified True Belief)

    M2E1: It's Super Effective! (Pokémon and Justified True Belief)

    Module two episode one!

    What is knowledge? How do we know when we know something? How do we know whether we know that we know anything?

    To answer all these questions and more (or just to wonder about them and form no conclusions whatsoever), Philosophiraga is here to explain what Justified True Belief means with the help of Pokémon.

    If you're a fan of the show, I'm given to understand that feeding the algorithms by leaving ratings or reviews on Apple Podcasts or Podchaser is about the most helpful thing you can do, so... go do that. Thanks!

    You can also:

    Find me on Twitter: @overthinkery1 (and The Well-Red Mage @TheWellRedMage)
    Discuss Philosophiraga on Reddit at The Well-Reddit Page
    Check out more Magely content at TheWellRedMage.com

    OR THE BESTEST NICEST THING YOU COULD DO:
    Support the show with a monthly pledge of any amount on Patreon to receive great boons and much love!

    Support the show

    Special Episode 6| Rene Descartes Meditation Three| God and Establishing The Metaphysical Foundation

    Special Episode 6| Rene Descartes Meditation Three| God and Establishing The Metaphysical Foundation

    In the sixth special episode of Dissecting Philosophy with Dr McDonald, he discusses the Third Meditation in Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy. There is a discussion of criticisms of the third meditation by Descartes' contemporaries theologian Johannes Caterus and theologian, philosopher and mathematician Antonine Arnauld. The film Bruce Almighty (2003) is also discussed to illustrate the section.

    If you would like to follow along the version of the text he's using is Mediations, Objections and Replies, edited and translated by Roger Ariew and Donald Cress (Hackett, 2006)

    Feel free to send questions or comments to dissectingphilosophy@gmail.com

    New episodes every Monday.

    Social media:
    Twitter: @iamarubberman
    Instagram: dissectingphilosophywithdrmcd

    Support the podcast:
    https://www.patreon.com/Dissectingphilosophy

    Credits: 
    Podcast Intro and Outro Music - Arctic and Fir from the album Delicate Felt Piano by Chad Crouch that can be downloaded at https://soundofpicture.bandcamp.com/album/delicate-felt-piano

    Podcast Logo - created using Canva https://www.canva.com

    Support the show

    Special Episode 5| Rene Descartes Meditation Two| The Mind, Thought and Wax

    Special Episode 5| Rene Descartes Meditation Two| The Mind, Thought and Wax

    In the fifth special episode of Dissecting Philosophy with Dr McDonald, he discusses the second meditation in Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy. There is also a discussion of a criticism of the second meditation by polymath Marin Mersenne.

    If you would like to follow along the version of the text he's using is Mediations, Objections and Replies, edited and translated by Roger Ariew and Donald Cress (Hackett, 2006)

    Feel free to send questions or comments to dissectingphilosophy@gmail.com

    New episodes every Monday.

    Social media:
    Twitter: @iamarubberman
    Instagram: dissectingphilosophywithdrmcd

    Support the podcast:
    https://www.patreon.com/Dissectingphilosophy

    Credits: 
    Podcast Intro and Outro Music - Arctic and Fir from the album Delicate Felt Piano by Chad Crouch that can be downloaded at https://soundofpicture.bandcamp.com/album/delicate-felt-piano

    Podcast Logo - created using Canva https://www.canva.com

    Support the show

    Special Episode 4| Rene Descartes Meditation One| Doubt, Dreams and the Evil Deceiver

    Special Episode 4| Rene Descartes Meditation One| Doubt, Dreams and the Evil Deceiver

    In the fourth special episode of Dissecting Philosophy with Dr McDonald, he discusses the First Meditation in Rene Descartes' Meditations on First Philosophy. There is also a discussion of a criticism of the first meditation by British empirical philosopher Thomas Hobbes.

    If you would like to follow along the version of the text he's using is Mediations, Objections and Replies, edited and translated by Roger Ariew and Donald Cress (Hackett, 2006)

    Feel free to send questions or comments to dissectingphilosophy@gmail.com

    New episodes every Monday.

    Social media:
    Twitter: @iamarubberman
    Instagram: dissectingphilosophywithdrmcd

    Support the podcast:
    https://www.patreon.com/Dissectingphilosophy

    Credits: 
    Podcast Intro and Outro Music - Arctic and Fir from the album Delicate Felt Piano by Chad Crouch that can be downloaded at https://soundofpicture.bandcamp.com/album/delicate-felt-piano

    Podcast Logo - created using Canva https://www.canva.com

    Support the show

    Episode 38: Just Theory (w/ John Jost & Jim Sidanius)

    Episode 38: Just Theory (w/ John Jost & Jim Sidanius)
    ABOUT THIS EPISODE Historically, many activists and organizers have struggled to enact their visions of social justice, and many do so to this very day. What role, if any, can and should social psychology play in such struggles? Do we have a role to play? Or do the risks of such engagement outweigh any potential rewards? In this episode, I discuss such issues with social psychologists John Jost and Jim Sidanius. Jost co-crafted system justification theory, and Sidanius co-crafted social dominance theory, each a theory relevant to social justice. LINKS --John Jost's NYU profile (http://as.nyu.edu/content/nyu-as/as/faculty/john-jost.html) --Jim Sidanius's Harvard profile (https://scholar.harvard.edu/sidanius/home) --"Digital Dissent: An Analysis of the Motivational Contents of Tweets From an Occupy Wall Street Demonstration," by Langer, Jost, et al. (2018) (http://as.nyu.edu/content/dam/nyu-as/psychology/documents/facultypublications/johnjost/Digital%20dissent_An%20analysis%20of%20OWS%20tweets.pdf) --"Ethnic and National Attachment in the Rainbow Nation: The Case of the Republic of South Africa," by Sidanius, Brubacher, and Silinda (2019) (https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/0022022118814679) Special Guests: Jim Sidanius and John Jost.

    3055 The Death of Reason: Why People Don't Listen to Reason and Evidence

    3055 The Death of Reason: Why People Don't Listen to Reason and Evidence
    All living organisms depend upon their accurate perception of reality to survive and reproduce. If a gazelle fails to identify a predator, it will get eaten. For a lion, a mistimed lunge may be the difference between a full belly and death through starvation, or even broken bones from a zebra’s kick. Human beings lack the sharp nails and teeth of lions or the speed of gazelles, yet we posses the most powerful – and dangerous – tool within the animal kingdom – our minds. We would therefore expect the human brain to be highly capable of accurately analyzing and conceptualizing the world around us. The process of reasoning invariably involves the use of logic, and logic itself is derived from the immutable properties of the physical world. Empiricism is another component of reason that depends upon the accurate perception of reality. Reason is thus incredibly valuable to us, but what if reason itself gets in the way of our survival and reproductive success? | Sources: http://www.fdrurl.com/death-of-reason

    2846 The Stephen Hawking Pin Up Calendar - Wednesday Call In Show November 19th, 2014

    2846 The Stephen Hawking Pin Up Calendar - Wednesday Call In Show November 19th, 2014
    Are "buy-here finance-here" businesses ethical or do they exploit the poor? Does empathy actually make you weak? Why is it when I am open and honest with people I push them away rather than connect with them?

    Includes: The poor are not immune to being dicks, the importance of social trust, the cost of doing business, no such thing as a free lunch, paying the douche-bag tax, feminist response to scientist Matt Taylor’s “offensive” shirt, street harassment in NYC, preparing yourself for financial collapse, why it’s essential to be hated, welfare programs vs. open immigration, gender related empathy differences, empathy leaves you vulnerable to predators, authenticity is punished, the science behind empathy, disrespecting the idea of love, the disgusting suggestion that rape victims should love their rapists, pushing back against hallmark card myths, the vacuum of unanswered questions and dissociating through the use of marijuana.

    Element U Week 2: The Existence of God (EU 201)

    Element U Week 2: The Existence of God (EU 201)
    Three Main Arguments
    1. The Moral Argument
    2. The Cosmological Argument
    3. The Teleological Argument (“Fine Tuning”)
    • Argument is not a fight or quarrel
    • True philosopher doesn’t use arguments for the sake of arguing but for the sake of truth
    • We use arguments all the time in our lives
    • Why Philosophy?

    “To be ignorant and simple now--not to be able to meet the enemies on their own ground--would be to throw down our weapons, and to betray our uneducated brethren who have, under God, no defense but us against the intellectual attacks of the heathen. Good philosophy must exist, if for no other reason because bad philosophy needs to be answered.” - CS Lewis, The Weight of Glory (pg 50)
    A Christian should be able to give a logos (reason) for belief in the theos (God) of the Bible and this is where philosophy is helpful (1 Peter 3:15).
    The goal of an argument is not to prove absolute certainty which leads to skepticism but to try and show what is most probable/plausible and makes the most sense when looking at all options.

    Element U 201: WHAT IS APOLOGETICS: And Why Is It Important?

    Element U 201: WHAT IS APOLOGETICS: And Why Is It Important?
    The word for “defense” is where we get our word apology, it means a defense like you would make in a court
    of law.

    This class will cover how to make a defense to various things such as:
    -the existence of God,
    -the proof of the resurrection of Jesus,
    -the reliability of the scriptures,
    -competing systems of thought,
    -what some call the “problems” of a biblical position.