A Controversial Dog Toy: The Supreme Court Ruling on a Jack Daniels Chew Toy
On this episode of The PodCask: a Podcast About Whiskey, Will and Greeze explore a wide variety of whiskey-related topics. They begin by discussing a legal controversy surrounding a dog toy resembling the Jack Daniels bottle, before delving into the history of the Weller family and their involvement in the early American whiskey industry. The Supreme Court's recent decision on parody dog toys is also analyzed. In addition to these legal topics, the hosts and guest discuss the ethics of administering Botox to intoxicated individuals, as well as recent developments in the Southern Whiskey Society holiday market. Along the way, they touch on issues of website word choice, cream liquor preferences, and gift-giving.
[00:00:55] Bourbon drinking, Botox, ethical concerns.
[00:05:49] Experimental emmer wheat honors Weller family history.
[00:06:46] Whiskey producer leased still, no will found.
[00:12:12] Steve Jobs words, experimental line, peppermint bourbon?
[00:14:42] Microwaved eggs make perfect sandwich filling.
[00:19:58] Bourbon shared, still more than half left.
[00:22:01] Bourbon spilled, computer off, drink talk.
[00:25:37] Supreme Court allows parody dog toys.
[00:30:04] Supreme court judge's hypothetical Jack Daniels pitch.
[00:31:05] Jack Daniels markets brand extensively, causing confusion.
[00:36:42] Concern over loss of charm in event.
[00:43:22] Straight talk, try idol motor oil?
[00:45:59] Memory lapse on podcast duration and rewards.
[00:48:01] Whiskey talk, promote podcast, join barrel club.
