precedent

American Whitewater published their Top 10 List of Stewardship issues in January 2024.  This is a mix of dam removal projects, legislation and policy pushes, Wild and Scenic options, all encompassed in the work from American Whitewater to keep rivers clean and accessible.  This episode is an interview Kevin Colburn from American Whitewater learning about each river on this list and the positive end goals. 

SPONSORS

AED One Stop Shop

Over It Raft Covers
@overitraftcovers

GUESTS
American Whitewater Website
@americanwhitewater
Facebook
AW Membership
@kevincolburn42

 

THE RIVER RADIUS

Website

Instagram

Facebook

Apple Podcast

Spotify

Link Tree

In 1973, in the throes of the Watergate scandal, three young federal prosecutors uncovered a separate criminal scheme being run inside the White House — the sitting vice president, Spiro Agnew, was taking envelopes stuffed with cash in exchange for official acts as an elected official. If Nixon left office, Agnew would be the next President. And so, what would happen if the President was charged with a federal crime? Worse yet, what if he was convicted? Now that Donald Trump has been charged with 37 federal crimes – as he runs again for president — Rachel Maddow and Bag Man executive producer Mike Yarvitz talk with the three Spiro Agnew prosecutors who have the only experience in our nation’s history with a situation like this.

What is the future of constitutional rights protections and equal citizenship in our constitutional democracy? Is substantive due process over after Dobbs, or can we reconstruct it?  

We talk with Jim Fleming (Boston University School of Law, JD/PhD) about his recent book, “Constructing Basic Liberties: A Defense of Substantive Due Process” (2022), in conversation with Ken Kersch (Boston College, Political Science, JD/PhD), an expert on conservative political and legal thought, and working on a new book "The Right Rights: The Conservative Encounter with Civil Rights and Civil Liberties, 1954-1980."

In this episode i reference the amazing book Midline's. You can find it here

https://amzn.to/3zvfZy6

I invite you to join my mailing list at Developing Leaders Inc, where you will not only receive a free copy of my ebook on delegation but you will also get a free leadership course.

Finally we are creating a community of leaders eager to learn and grow. To join us click this link and join us at Mentoring Leaders

When the Supreme Court decides how the law, and the Constitution, should be interpreted in a case, that interpretation becomes a precedent. Once that judicial precedent has been set, it's understood that the interpretation and its reasoning should be applied to similar cases in the future. So why might the Supreme Court reconsider its own precedent? And what happens when a precedent is modified, or overruled? 

We talk to Nina Varsava, a law professor at University of Wisconsin, Madison who studies judicial precedent, and wrote the article, "Precedent on Precedent," and Rachel Rebouche, a law professor at Temple University who specializes in family law, health care law, and comparative family law, and has written about the potential impact of overturning Roe v Wade. 

PS, want to score a cool new Civics 101 sticker and a $500 Airbnb gift card? Donate to the show! You'll support us and maybe you can go rent an idyllic cabin in Norway.

CLICK HERE: Visit our website to donate to the podcast, sign up for our newsletter, get free educational materials, and more! 

Today, I will talk about a very important principle of law, the principle of stare decisis. I will discuss the same with a jurisprudential perspective to provide conceptual clarity in relation to the doctrine of stare decisis.

To know more about the present post, please visit https://www.desikanoon.co.in/2021/12/basics-of-doctrine-of-stare-decisis.html

Telegram: https://t.me/Legal_Talks_by_DesiKanoon

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMmVCFV7-Kfo_6S42kPhz2w

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-talks-by-desikanoon/id1510617120

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3KdnziPc4I73VfEcFJa59X?si=vYgrOEraQD-NjcoXA2a7Lg&dl_branch=1&nd=1

Google Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5zaW1wbGVjYXN0LmNvbS84ZTZTcGREcw?sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiuz4ifzpLxAhVklGMGHb4HAdwQ9sEGegQIARAD

Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/4b89fb71-1836-414e-86f6-1116324dd7bc/Legal-Talks-by-Desikanoon 

Please subscribe and follow us on YouTube, Instagram, iTunes, Twitter, LinkedIn, Discord, Telegram and Facebook. 

Credits:

 Music by Wataboi from Pixabay 

Thank you for listening!

Today, I will talk about two very important concepts, precedent and stare decisis. We have heard these terms quite often and I am sure that many of you would already be aware about their respective meanings. 

To know more about it, please visit https://www.desikanoon.co.in/2021/10/doctrine-of-precedent-and-stare-decisis.html

Telegram: https://t.me/Legal_Talks_by_DesiKanoon

YouTube Channel: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCMmVCFV7-Kfo_6S42kPhz2w

Apple Podcasts: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/legal-talks-by-desikanoon/id1510617120

Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/3KdnziPc4I73VfEcFJa59X?si=vYgrOEraQD-NjcoXA2a7Lg&dl_branch=1&nd=1

Google Podcasts: https://podcasts.google.com/feed/aHR0cHM6Ly9mZWVkcy5zaW1wbGVjYXN0LmNvbS84ZTZTcGREcw?sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwiuz4ifzpLxAhVklGMGHb4HAdwQ9sEGegQIARAD

Amazon Music: https://music.amazon.com/podcasts/4b89fb71-1836-414e-86f6-1116324dd7bc/Legal-Talks-by-Desikanoon 

Please subscribe and follow us on YouTube, Instagram, iTunes, Twitter, LinkedIn, Discord, Telegram and Facebook. 

Credits:

 Music by Wataboi from Pixabay 

Thank you for listening!

This is the fourth episode in a five-part series on the U.S. Constitution which explores the meaning of: The establishment clause of the 1st Amendment, along with the nature and scope of the 9th and 10th Amendments, as well as the guarantee clause of Article IV, Section 4 of the Constitution. All of the foregoing is pursued in relation to the roles of Congress, the Executive, and the Judiciary. 

Police Use Of Force, What The Law Says. And How Cities Often Make The Reaction Worse. Attorney Lance LoRusso is our guest. Lance is a former law enforcement officer and is a practicing lawyer with offices in Georgia and Tennessee. In addition to numerous areas of the law he is an expert in the field of Law Enforcement Officer use of force. He talks about what the law says about what is considered excessive, the vague over used term of police brutality and how departments and cities often make the response to these incidents worse. Lance is also a published author and an in demand media expert in policing and the law.

Interested in being a guest, sponsorship or advertising opportunities send an email to the host and producer of the show jay@letradio.com.

Follow us on MeWe, Twitter, Instagram, Facebook.

Background song Hurricane is used with permission from the band Dark Horse Flyer.

If you enjoy the show, please tell a friend or two, or three about it. If you are able to leave an honest rating and, or, review it would be appreciated.

Never miss out on an episode of the Law Enforcement Talk Podcast subscribe to our free email newsletter, never more than 2 issues a week sent out. Click here and scroll down about halfway.

Be sure to check out our website.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

This is Arnie and Fred's third discussion of Divine or God's Authority. Our first discussion considered what we termed  a "Chain of Divine Authority", beginning with God having all authority. Our second session reviewed the New Testament's inspiration, completeness, certainty, assurance and authority as God's final revelation of His will,replacing the Old Testament; that all men must obey it, and that now only teachings and practices authorized in the New Testament are in fact, authorized. The focus of our discussion today will be how to understand and apply what the New Testament allows and requires, as opposed to what it forbids. Take about 30 minutes to listen in on our discussion. Have your Bible handy to make sure what we say is in fact what the Bible says.

Transcript: Click Here

Articles and books we referenced for this episode:

Have Identity Politics Gone Too Far, April 2018

Identity Politics Threatens the American Experiment - WSJ, May 18, 2018

Why I Don't Support Identity Politics Anymore _ Opinion _ The Harvard Crimson, Jan 24, 2018

Debunking the myth that “identity politics” is bad for the Democratic Party - Vox, Apr 21,2018

Identity Politics (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy), Jul 16, 2002; rev Mar 23, 2016

Opinion _ The End of Identity Liberalism - The New York Times, Nov 18, 2016

What Liberals Get Wrong About Identity Politics _ The New Republic, Sep 11, 2017

Identity Politics Can’t Get Us Out of the Mess Racism Made, Nov 13, 2017

Identity crises_ Identity, identity politics, and beyond_ Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy_ Vol 2, No 1, Sep 25, 2007

What Is the Left Without Identity Politics_ _ The Nation, Dec 16, 2016

How America's identity politics went from inclusion to division _ Society _ The Guardian, Mar 1, 2018

Opinion _ Back to the Center, Democrats - The New York Times, July 6, 2017

Reject the Identity Politics of the Alt-Right and the Control-Left - Foundation for Economic Education

Identity Politics _ Philosophy Talk, Jul 14, 2016

Identity Politics Ruined the Democratic Party _ National Review, Oct 26, 2017

Neoliberal identity politics has failed and has to be replaced with class politics _ I Am Not A Number, Jan 6, 2-18

Political inclusion is vital to sustainable democracy _ International IDEA, Jun 28, 2017

Political Inclusion _ United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization

The politics of inclusion - The Americas, Nov 13, 2014

How Tribalism Overrules Reason, and Makes Risky Times More Dangerous _ Big Think

Sarah Silverman Responds to Twitter Attack In Perfect Way _ Men’s Health, Jan 2, 2018

Sarah Silverman on Her New Show ‘I Love You, America’, Oct 10, 2017

Amy Chua, Political Tribes

Stonewall Riots

Civil Rights History

Free Speech

Transgender Teen In Virginia Bathroom Case Wins In Appeals Court _ The Two-Way _ NPR, April 19, 2016

Implicit Bias Test

Black Lives Matter _ About

Women’s Movement _ Overview, History, & Facts _ Britannica.com

The U.S. Immigration Debate _ Council on Foreign Relations

The Psychedelic Experiments And Experiences Of Timothy Leary _ Groovy History

Bisexual_Invisiblity_Impacts_and_Recommendations_March_2011

The U.S. bisexual+ movement_ a #BiWeek history lesson _ GLAAD

Biracial-Bisexual Individuals_ Identity Coming of Age

Boulder courthouse up for historic designation for Clela Rorex's same-sex marriage licenses in 1975 - Boulder Daily Camera, Apr 21, 2018

https://www.abuseandrelationships.org/Content/Survivors/trauma_bonding.html

Trauma Bonding

How Exclusion From the Military Strengthened Gay Identity in America - Rolling Stone, Oct 23, 2016

A History of Flag Burning, Nov 14, 2016

BiCurean Moment:

GLOW

Gibson Files for Bankruptcy in Deal to Renew Guitar Business - Bloomberg, May 1, 2018

Transcript of episode (link following): https://docs.google.com/document/d/1AIxq0_1xI-rA9U_GaS-j1LtQIi7Wvdbzyc7vibh_0MM/edit?usp=sharing

*Clarification* Erik asserted the Civil War was about states right's. We know that it is was far more complex than that and that was an aspect of the causes.

Quote from Runaway World: There are three main areas in which emotional communication, and therefore intimacy, are replacing the old ties that used to bind together people’s personal lives – in sexual and love relationships, parent–child relationships and also in friendship. To analyse these I want to use the idea of the ‘pure relationship’. I mean by this a relationship based upon emotional communication, where the rewards derived from such communication are the main basis for the relationship to continue. I don’t mean a sexually pure relationship. Also I don’t mean anything that exists in reality. I’m talking of an abstract idea that helps us understand changes going on in the world. Each of the three areas just mentioned – sexual and love relationships, parent–child relationships and friendship – is tending to approximate to this model. Emotional communication or intimacy is becoming the key to what they are all about.

Articles and books we referenced for this episode:

Marijuana’s huge impact in Colorado, by the numbers _ FOX31 Denver Jan 4, 2018

Despite claims, data show legalized marijuana has not increased crime rates - Colorado Politics Feb 28, 2018

Five years in_ The effects of legalization in Colorado and Washington state - Lift News Nov 13, 2017

Increase in harder drugs after the decriminalization of pot

Colorado's Drug Problem Among USA's Worst, Study Says _ Westword May 31, 2017

States Rights - constitution _ Laws.com

Civil war about states rights

History of DOMA

The Role of Precedent in the United States_ How Do Precedents Lose Their Binding Effect_ - China Guiding Cases Project

Article IV _ Constitution _ US Law _ LII _ Legal Information Institute

Obama administration will not block state marijuana laws if distribution is regulated - The Washington Post Aug 29, 2013

Addiction: The view from Rat Park

Runaway World by Anthony Giddens

The Legalization of Marijuana in Colorado_ The Impact, Sept 2016 Vol 4

Correlation versus Causality

Stoned Driving Nearly Doubles the Risk of a Fatal Crash _ TIME.com, Feb 10, 2012

Hair dyes and cancer-cancer myth - Cancer Council Western Australia, Jan 01, 2018

The Rocky Mountain High Intensity Drug Trafficking Area (HIDTA) program was established by the White House Office of National Drug Control Policy (ONDCP) in 1996.

How long can a drug test detect cannabis usage_ – Calculator _ Marijuana Central

Alcohol, Drugs and Crime

Government Says You Can’t Overcome Addiction, Contrary to What Government Research Shows - Reason.com, Feb 01, 2014

10% of the U.S. Population Has Quit Drugs or Alcohol _ TIME.com, Mar 7, 2012

Decision-Making Under Stress_ The Brain Remembers Rewards, Forgets Punishments _ TIME.com, Mar 5, 2012

Dihydrogen Monoxide - The Truth

Philly’s post-Super Bowl ‘celebration’ was really a riot, Feb 6, 2018

What Is Confirmation Bias_ _ Psychology Today, Apr 23, 2015

Can Americans be financially coerced to underwrite labor unions when they are opposed to positions taken by unions?

That was the big issue this week before the nation’s highest court—whether workers can be coerced to financially underwrite and undergird labor unions when the positions taken by the union would be opposed to their own convictions.

The case is known as Janus v. AFSCME—the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees—and it challenges Supreme Court precedent that goes back four decades, requiring persons in certain categories of employment to contribute union dues and fees even when they do not want to be members of the union.

Today, with Justice Neil Gorsuch on the court, it is expected that the court will reverse its 40-year-plus precedent.

This may mean a big, big change on America’s political landscape.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Can Americans be financially coerced to underwrite labor unions when they are opposed to positions taken by unions?

That was the big issue this week before the nation’s highest court—whether workers can be coerced to financially underwrite and undergird labor unions when the positions taken by the union would be opposed to their own convictions.

The case is known as Janus v. AFSCME—the American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees—and it challenges Supreme Court precedent that goes back four decades, requiring persons in certain categories of employment to contribute union dues and fees even when they do not want to be members of the union.

Today, with Justice Neil Gorsuch on the court, it is expected that the court will reverse its 40-year-plus precedent.

This may mean a big, big change on America’s political landscape.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.