Logo

    subject matter jurisdiction

    Explore " subject matter jurisdiction" with insightful episodes like "Attorney T. Matt Phillips Explains How Judges Acted In Clear Absence Of Jurisdiction In His Case And Now The Judges Are Personally Liable For A Lawsuit", "Subject Matter Jurisdiction" and "Property Lessons from Thor and Civil Procedure from Ant-Man" from podcasts like ""Slam the Gavel", "Law to Fact" and "The Legal Geeks"" and more!

    Episodes (3)

    Attorney T. Matt Phillips Explains How Judges Acted In Clear Absence Of Jurisdiction In His Case And Now The Judges Are Personally Liable For A Lawsuit

    Attorney T. Matt Phillips Explains How Judges Acted In Clear Absence Of Jurisdiction In His Case And Now The Judges Are Personally Liable For A Lawsuit

         Slam the Gavel welcomes  Attorney T. Matthew Phillips. He is a California attorney for well over 20-plus years. The discussion  was explained extremely well how Family Courts wrongfully allow judges to convict parents on criminal statutes, despite the fact that the accused parents are never actually indicted on such criminal statutes—which means the judges lack legal authority, (subject-matter jurisdiction) to find and conclude that parents violate criminal statutes, which violates “due process.”
        Family Courts wrongfully allow parents—in their custody hearings—to play the dual roles of “victim” and “special prosecutor,” and further, it wrongfully allows parents to privately bring criminal causes-of-action against one another—which violates the accused parent’s right to a “fair trial.” Especially when there are false accusations involved.
         Attorney Phillips explained how Family courts wrongfully allow judges to try and convict parents on criminal statutes—based on too low an evidentiary standard— i.e., the “clear and convincing” standard—instead of the constitutional standard for criminal statutes, i.e., “beyond a reasonable doubt,” which is unconstitutional. 
          Family courts wrongfully allow judges to conclude that parents violate criminal statutes—despite the fact that such parents have never actually been found guilty, i.e., no “presumption of innocence,” which is unconstitutional.  
          The unconstitutional Family courts wrongfully allow judges to try and convict parents on criminal statutes—with no “trial by jury," which is extremely frustrating for parents when losing their children due to false allegations whether CPS is involved or not. 
          Very insightful conversation not to be missed.

      To Reach T. Matthew Phillips: Attorney-at-Law, (323) 314-6996
                                                                        tmatthewphillips@aol.com

    Supportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)
    http://beentheregotout.com/
    http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/

    Support the show

    Supportshow(https://www.buymeacoffee.com/maryannpetri)

    http://www.dismantlingfamilycourtcorruption.com/

    Subject Matter Jurisdiction

    Subject Matter Jurisdiction

    In this episode…

    Ryan Williams, of Mitchell Hamline School of Law and a member of the Kaplan Bar Prep faculty, explains subject matter jurisdiction. 

    About our guest…

    Professor Williams is a Yale University and Georgetown Law graduate, specializing in Civil Procedure, Torts and Bar preparation.  He currently teaches at Mitchell Hamline School of Law, and as a bar exam expert lecturer for Kaplan. He has also published numerous articles on national security, and in 2014 was named one of the top law Professors of color in America by Lawyers of Color Magazine. 

    Law to Fact is a podcast about law school for law school students.
    -
    As always, if you have any suggestions for an episode topic, please let us know!
    You can email leslie@lawtofact.com or tweet @lawtofact.
    -
    Find us on Twitter, Instagram, and Facebook!
    Review us on iTunes, your opinion matters!
    -
    Want to stay updated on all things Law to Fact?
    Join our mailing list by visiting www.LawToFact.com.
    -

    This episode is sponsored by Kaplan Bar Review. Getting ready for the bar exam means you’ll need to choose the study program that’s right for you. Kaplan Bar Review will get you ready to take on test day with confidence by offering $100 off live and on-demand Bar Review with offer code Leslie100.

    Visit kaplanbarreview.com today to sign up.

    Property Lessons from Thor and Civil Procedure from Ant-Man

    Property Lessons from Thor and Civil Procedure from Ant-Man
    Jess and Josh discuss who is the rightful owner of Thor's Hammer, each from different legal theories. Josh discusses the civil procedure issues from Ant-Man issue 2 and where Tony Stark could sue Scott Lang. Support the show


    No part of this recording should be considered legal advice.
    Follow us on Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, YouTube, and TikTok @TheLegalGeeks

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io