Logo

    180. What Makes Some Objects Feel Special?

    en-usJanuary 28, 2024
    What sources contribute to the emotional significance of objects?
    How does sentimental value affect the worth of objects?
    Why do people cherish items from deceased family members?
    What personal experiences did Angela and Mike share about sentimental items?
    How can using sentimental items impact their emotional value?

    Podcast Summary

    • The emotional value of objectsObjects can hold great value beyond their functional use due to sentimental attachment or personal history.

      The emotional significance of objects can stem from various sources, such as sentimental value, personal history, or thoughtful gestures. These objects can hold great value to us, sometimes beyond their functional use. For instance, a handmade mug from a beloved professor might not be used regularly but is kept with care due to its emotional significance. Similarly, a bike that once belonged to a deceased family member might not be used frequently but is cherished and kept as a memory. The sender of the email, Jordan, was curious about how objects acquire value and if using them degrades their worth. However, the hosts, Angela and Mike, shared their personal experiences of sentimental objects and emphasized that the emotional connection to an object can make it valuable and significant, regardless of its functional use.

    • Sentimental value of objectsWe keep objects for their emotional connection to people, events, or times in our lives, rather than just their functionality or attractiveness.

      Our attachment to physical objects goes beyond their functional use or attractiveness, and is often rooted in their sentimental value. This value can stem from a connection to a meaningful person or an association with a special event or time in our lives. For instance, the speaker found sentimental value in keeping old baseball cards, mortarboards from graduations, and even a wedding veil, despite not intending to use them again. These objects serve as reminders and evoke positive memories and emotions. Additionally, the idea that we hold onto items from the past, like the speaker's paintings from her mother, can be attributed to this sentimental value.

    • Sentimental attachments don't follow the same downward trend as other objectsSentimental items continue to bring joy and meaning due to their connections to people and memories we care about deeply. Find a balance between sentimentality and practicality to hold onto what truly matters while reducing clutter.

      While we may habituate to physical objects and their initial pleasure wears off over time, our sentimental attachments to items hold a different value. According to researchers Yang Yang and Jeff Gallick, sentimental attachments do not follow the same downward trend of pleasure or "hedonic adaptation" as other objects. Instead, these items continue to bring us joy and meaning due to their connections to people and memories we care about deeply. The challenge lies in curating our possessions to keep sentimental items while letting go of others. The concept of minimalism, as promoted by Marie Kondo, encourages us to evaluate each item and only keep those that spark joy. However, for some, the thought of discarding parts of a cherished book, for instance, may be difficult. Ultimately, it's essential to find a balance between sentimentality and practicality, allowing us to hold onto the things that truly matter while reducing clutter.

    • People's attachment to their possessions, especially sentimental onesHalf of people consider a family heirloom their most prized possession, emphasizing the emotional significance of possessions in our lives.

      People value their physical possessions, especially those with sentimental meaning, and they hold onto them as keepsakes, much like old friends. The discussion also touched upon the idea that objects can hold more significance than just their physical form, and destroying them intentionally can evoke strong emotions. A survey conducted by Shinola in 2020 revealed that nearly half of the respondents considered a family heirloom to be their most prized possession. Angela shared her attachment to a painting her mother made, while Mike acknowledged the importance of a family heirloom in his own life. The conversation emphasized the emotional connection people have with their possessions and the role they play in shaping our memories and experiences.

    • Heirlooms: Tangible Reminders of Loved Ones and Their StoriesHeirlooms hold emotional value and become cherished family possessions, as they can symbolize a magical connection to loved ones and their stories. Research shows people have an irrational aversion to consuming items that have come into contact with certain objects, emphasizing their importance as tangible reminders.

      Heirlooms hold significant emotional value and can become cherished family possessions for generations. The speaker shares her experiences with her own stuffed animals and her brother's watch, which they plan to pass down. Research suggests that people believe objects can hold a part of the person who used them, creating a magical connection. An experiment by psychologist Paul Rosen demonstrated that people have an irrational aversion to consuming food or drinks that have come into contact with certain objects, even if those objects no longer pose a threat. These findings underscore the importance of heirlooms as tangible reminders of our loved ones and their stories. The speaker's family anecdotes and the research on contagion highlight the emotional significance of objects and the enduring impact they can have on our lives.

    • Our connections to objects involve both symbolic associations and potential beliefs in essence transmissionOur relationships with objects can involve a combination of literal and symbolic meanings, and the value we place on them can depend on personal history and cultural context.

      Our connection to objects can be complex and multifaceted, involving both symbolic associations and potential beliefs in the transmission of essence through physical contact. The example of a sweater once owned by a controversial figure like Hitler illustrates this. While some may feel repelled by the idea of owning or even touching such an object due to its symbolic associations, others may see it as a reminder of history that should be preserved. This raises questions about the role of magical thinking and the importance of sentimental attachments in our lives. Ultimately, it seems that our relationships with objects can involve a combination of literal and symbolic meanings, and the value we place on them can depend on a variety of factors, including personal history and cultural context.

    • The importance of saving personal items from our pastPreserving past journals and photos can offer insights into our personal growth and past selves, but we may overlook their value and take them for granted.

      Holding onto personal items from our past, such as journals and photos, can provide valuable insights into our past selves and help us better understand our own personal growth. The speaker deeply regrets not saving his journals from childhood to adulthood, as they could serve as a window into who he was during those formative years. He also acknowledges that he may have projected his present self onto his younger self and misunderstood his past motivations. The speaker's mother's decision to discard his journals was a missed opportunity to preserve a piece of his history. The speaker reflects on his tendency to resist sentimentality and take things for granted, and he encourages others to consider the value of saving personal items from their past.

    • The meaning and value of objects can be influenced by emotions and practical considerationsPeople value objects based on their emotional attachment and frequency of use. Practical considerations can also impact the value of an object.

      The meaning and value we attach to objects in our lives can be influenced by various factors, including their sentimental significance and how frequently we use them. According to a survey, family photos and jewelry top the list of Americans' most prized possessions, highlighting the emotional attachment people have towards these items. However, the speaker shared that her mother, who immigrated from China and had limited resources, didn't hold onto these sentimental items due to practical reasons and her lack of sentimentality. Moreover, the value of an object can also depend on whether using it adds or subtracts value. The speaker suggested that most objects become more meaningful when used regularly, but there are exceptions, such as pieces of art. The mug the speaker sent to Mike, which he never used, might accumulate sentimental interest over time, but it might also be less meaningful to him if it were his daily use mug. Ultimately, the meaning and value we attach to objects are subjective and can be influenced by our experiences, emotions, and practical considerations.

    • Sentimental Items Increase in Value with TimeUse and cherish sentimental items as their emotional attachment and memories make them invaluable, despite the risk of damage or loss.

      Sentimental items hold more value when they are used and passed down through generations. This was discussed in relation to jewelry, watches, and even mugs. The idea is that these items carry symbolic meaning and memories, and their value increases with the length of time they have been with us. For instance, a necklace or watch that has been worn by multiple family members can hold significant emotional attachment. However, the fear of damaging these items can sometimes prevent us from using them. The speaker shared a personal story about losing diamond earrings and the emotional distress it caused. She suggested that we should use and enjoy sentimental items, even if they can be lost or broken, as the memories and experiences they represent are invaluable. It's important to remember that these items do not hold the essence of the person who owned them before, but rather serve as a reminder of the time they spent with us. So, use your mug, wear your jewelry, and cherish the memories. It's also worth noting that there were some inaccuracies in the conversation regarding a piece of art owned by Angela. In a previous episode, it was mentioned that the oldest piece of art she has from her mother is a line drawing of her coming home from the hospital as a newborn. However, in this conversation, it was revealed that the oldest piece of art is actually a watercolor painting of a mountain rising from the sea that her mother painted when she was 24 years old.

    • Journey of change, letting go, and the power of beliefUnderstanding the power of belief and letting go of misconceptions can lead to personal growth and motivation.

      The discussion touched on various themes of change, letting go, and the power of belief. Angela shared a painting that symbolizes her journey from China to the United States, and Mike mentioned Marie Kondo's book on tidying up, which emphasizes keeping only items that resonate with you. The conversation also explored the idea of manifestation, with Angela sharing her experiences of believing in its power, even after realizing it wasn't based on quantum mysticism. Leo added his perspective on how manifestation kept him motivated, even after understanding its true nature. The episode also featured a fact check about apple seeds and cyanide. Despite the common belief that apple seeds contain cyanide, the truth is more complex, and food scientist Islamayat Folashade Bolarinwa confirmed that one would need to consume a large amount of apples and grind up the seeds for the poison to have any effect. Overall, the episode highlighted the importance of understanding the underlying mechanisms behind beliefs and practices, and the power of motivation and belief in driving personal growth.

    Recent Episodes from No Stupid Questions

    211. Why Do We Listen to Sad Songs?

    211. Why Do We Listen to Sad Songs?

    What are Mike and Angela’s favorite songs to cry to? Can upbeat music lift you out of a bad mood? And what is Angela going to sing the next time she does karaoke?

     

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usSeptember 15, 2024

    210. What Makes a Good Sense of Humor?

    210. What Makes a Good Sense of Humor?

    What is the evolutionary purpose of laughter? What’s the difference between Swedish depression and American depression? And why aren’t aliens interested in abducting Mike? 

     

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usSeptember 08, 2024

    Why Are Stories Stickier Than Statistics? (Replay)

    Why Are Stories Stickier Than Statistics? (Replay)

    Also: are the most memorable stories less likely to be true? Stephen Dubner chats with Angela Duckworth in this classic episode from July 2020.

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Pearl S. Buck, 20th-century American novelist.
      • Jack Gallant, professor of neuroscience and psychology at the University of California, Berkeley.
      • Steve Levitt, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Chicago, host of People I (Mostly) Admire, and co-author of the Freakonomics books.
      • George Loewenstein, professor of economics and psychology at Carnegie Mellon University.
      • Deborah Small, professor of marketing at Yale University.
      • Adin Steinsaltz, rabbi, philosopher, and author.
      • Diana Tamir, professor of neuroscience and psychology at Princeton University.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usSeptember 06, 2024

    209. Why Do We Settle?

    209. Why Do We Settle?

    Why does the U.S. use Fahrenheit when Celsius is better? Would you quit your job if a coin flip told you to? And how do you get an entire country to drive on the other side of the road?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Christian Crandall, professor of psychology at the University of Kansas.
      • Stephen Dubner, host of Freakonomics Radio and co-author of the Freakonomics books.
      • Scott Eidelman, professor of psychology at the University of Arkansas.
      • David Hume, 18th century Scottish philosopher.
      • Ellen Langer, professor of psychology at Harvard University.
      • Steve Levitt, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Chicago, host of People I (Mostly) Admire, and co-author of the Freakonomics books.
      • John McWhorter, professor of linguistics, English, and comparative literature at Columbia University.
      • Mark Twain, 19-20th century American writer.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usSeptember 01, 2024

    208. Can A.I. Companions Replace Human Connection?

    208. Can A.I. Companions Replace Human Connection?

    What happens when machines become funnier, kinder, and more empathetic than humans? Do robot therapists save lives? And should Angela credit her virtual assistant as a co-author of her book?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Robert Cialdini, professor emeritus of psychology at Arizona State University.
      • Reid Hoffman, co-founder and executive chairman of LinkedIn; co-founder and board member of Inflection AI.
      • Kazuo Ishiguro, novelist and screenwriter.
      • Ethan Mollick, professor of management and co-director of the Generative A.I. Lab at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Ann Patchett, author.
      • Kevin Roose, technology columnist for The New York Times and co-host of the podcast Hard Fork.
      • Niko Tinbergen, 20th-century Dutch biologist and ornithologist.
      • Lyle Ungar, professor of computer and information science at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • E. B. White, 20th-century American author.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 25, 2024

    207. How Clearly Do You See Yourself?

    207. How Clearly Do You See Yourself?

    Do you see yourself the same way others see you? What’s the difference between self-perception and self-awareness? And why do Mike and Angela both hate fishing?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Luis von Ahn, co-founder and C.E.O. of Duolingo; former chair of the board at Character Lab.
      • Paul DePodesta, chief strategy officer of the Cleveland Browns; former baseball executive.
      • Daniel Kahneman, professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at Princeton University.
      • Michel de Montaigne, 16th-century French philosopher.
      • Barbara Tversky, professor emerita of psychology at Stanford University and professor of psychology and education at Teachers College, Columbia University.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 18, 2024

    Why Do People Get Scammed? (Replay)

    Why Do People Get Scammed? (Replay)

    What makes a con succeed? Does snake oil actually work? And just how gullible is Angela?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Robert Cialdini, professor emeritus of psychology and marketing at Arizona State University.
      • Yaniv Hanoch, professor of decision sciences at University of Southampton.
      • Hugo Mercier, research scientist at the French National Centre for Scientific Research.
      • George Parker, 19-20th century American con artist.
      • Clark Stanley, 19th century American herbalist and quack doctor.
      • William Thompson, 19th century American criminal and con artist.
      • Danny Wallace, British filmmaker, comedian, writer, and actor.
      • Stacey Wood, professor of psychology at Scripps College.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 11, 2024

    206. When Is It Time to Step Aside?

    206. When Is It Time to Step Aside?

    Should government jobs have mandatory retirement ages? Is it foolish to care about your legacy? And why did Jason always call Angela’s father “Dr. Lee”?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • William Bridges, professor emeritus of American literature at Mills College, consultant, and author.
      • Arthur Brooks, professor of leadership at Harvard University.
      • Jimmy Carter, former President of the United States and founder of the Carter Center.
      • Erik Erikson, 20th-century psychoanalyst.
      • Craig Fox, professor of management at the University of California, Los Angeles.
      • Daniel Kahneman, professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at Princeton University.
      • Mitt Romney, U.S. Senator from Utah.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 04, 2024

    205. Where Do Values Come From?

    205. Where Do Values Come From?

    Do you get your principles from your parents — or in spite of them? Is there anything wrong with valuing conformity? And why doesn’t McDonald’s sell salads? 

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Erika James, dean of the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Olivia Rodrigo, singer-songwriter.
      • Shalom Schwartz, professor emeritus of psychology at the Hebrew ‎‎University of Jerusalem.
      • Thomas Talhelm, professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usJuly 28, 2024

    204. What Happens When You’re Cut Off From All Human Contact?

    204. What Happens When You’re Cut Off From All Human Contact?

    How is the brain affected by solitary confinement? How would you deal with being stranded on a deserted island? And do baby monkeys make the best therapists? 

     

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usJuly 21, 2024

    Related Episodes

    A Walk Along the Old Tracks

    A Walk Along the Old Tracks

    Sometimes boyhood memories of playing along the old railroad tracks are the best.

    Robert Kinsley has authored two collections of poems: Endangered Species and Field Stones both from Orchises Press. He was born and raised on a dairy farm in northern Ohio. He teaches at Ohio University and has been Associate Editor of The Ohio Review for the last 18 years. He lives with his wife and son in Athens, Ohio.

    Jillian Curwin On What The LPA Austin National Conference Meant To Her

    Jillian Curwin On What The LPA Austin National Conference Meant To Her

    In this week's episode it is just me and the microphone as I sit in my thoughts and feelings and reflect on the Little People of America national conference that just took place in Austin. She explains what national conference is, what it is like to be there, in the moment, and what it feels like to leave. Of course there is laughter and tears.

    Follow Me: Instagram: @jill_ilana , @alwayslookingup.podcast Website: https://www.jillianilana.com Email: alwayslookingup227@gmail.com

    This episode was edited and produced by Ben Curwin.

    Tara Devlin & Elisse Western

    Tara Devlin & Elisse Western

    This is part 5 of Patriot-Made Audio's ongoing summer memories series. We bring you comedian and activist Tara Devlin of the Progressive Voices Channel and Elisse Western.

    What's more American than summer bar-b-ques and the smell of suntan lotion?  Well, not every family pitches a tent or gets their kids out of the city a summer vacation. Sometimes families are simply stuck in the city, all summer long.

    Take a listen to Progressive Voices channel host Tara Devlin's memories. She burst our summer fantasy bubble and we're delighted that she did.  You can follow the Twitter page of Comedian/Activist Tara (dacktyl) Devlin and listen to her 2-minute tirades via the Progressive Voices Channel or via Soundcloud. She tweets from Twitter @RepubDirtyTrick.

    Conversely, we also bring you Elisse Western, a proud employee of the Olive Garden Restaurant in Frederick, Learn more about the Olive Garden Italian Restaurant nearest you!Maryland. Elisse is a fresh faced, 21 year old who has a great summer memory with her dad. 

     We thank you for listening to this Patriot-Made Audio  Got a summer memory? Share it with us by sending your voice recording to patmadeaduio@gmail.com or text your audio memo to us at (202) 594.6138.

    Logo

    © 2024 Podcastworld. All rights reserved

    Stay up to date

    For any inquiries, please email us at hello@podcastworld.io