Logo

    203. Do You Need a Hug?

    en-usJuly 14, 2024
    What are the emotional benefits of physical touch?
    How do cultural traditions influence our perception of touch?
    What role does touch play in newborn bonding?
    How did personal experiences shape touch perceptions?
    Why is touch considered a universal human need?

    Podcast Summary

    • Human touchPhysical touch, like hugs, creates emotional and psychological benefits and is a universal human need, shaped by cultural traditions and personal experiences.

      Physical touch, such as hugs, is an important form of human connection that can have significant emotional and psychological benefits for people. The discussion highlighted how cultural traditions and personal experiences can shape our understanding and appreciation of touch. For instance, during a period at the Harvard Kennedy School, a cultural tradition of greeting each other with a kiss on the cheek created a sense of intimacy and drew people together. However, the lack of this tradition in other settings, like at Northwestern University, was noticeable. Additionally, the speakers shared their personal experiences with touch growing up and how it varied based on cultural backgrounds. Research also shows that all cultures have some form of touch ritual, making it a universal human need. Overall, the conversation emphasized the importance of physical touch in fostering connections and well-being.

    • Cultural variations in touchDespite touch being a universal human need, the types and amounts of touch considered normal vary greatly among cultures. Four main categories of touch are side hugs, stroking, kissing, and hugging. China has extremely low touch rates, and consent is the most common reason for not touching enough.

      While touch is a universal human need, the types and amounts of touch considered normal vary greatly among cultures. For instance, some cultures, like China, have low touch rates, while others, such as those in Latin America, are more touch-intensive. A study involving 14,000 people in 45 countries revealed that all cultures employ some form of touch, but there is significant diversity in how and whom we touch. The study identified four main categories of touch: side hugs, stroking, kissing, and hugging. China was an outlier in the study due to its extremely low touch rates. Pre-pandemic, almost half of adults felt society did not enable enough touch, and 72% reported a positive attitude towards touch, with comforting, warm, and love being the most common words used to describe it. Consent was the leading reason given for not touching enough.

    • Human TouchTouch plays a crucial role in building and strengthening connections between individuals, leading to increased engagement, closeness, and growth.

      The power of human connection goes beyond just seeing and hearing each other. The use of touch, such as a simple hug or light physical contact, can significantly enhance relationships and foster a sense of engagement, closeness, and growth. This concept was explored in various studies and anecdotes, including one where professors lightly touched their students' arms and observed increased student engagement, and another advocating for the importance of regular hugs for survival, maintenance, and growth. While the exact science behind it may vary, the consensus remains that touch plays a crucial role in building and strengthening connections between individuals. Whether it's between a professor and student, a parent and child, or any two people, the simple act of touching can create a profound sense of comfort, contentment, and connection.

    • Touch interventionsTouch interventions, such as massage and kangaroo care, have significant effects on mental and physical well-being for both babies and adults, reducing depression, anxiety, stress hormones, and increasing weight gain for babies, and recommended by WHO for premature infants

      Touch interventions, which span the entire lifespan and include various forms like massage for adults and kangaroo care for babies, have been found to have significant, sizable effects on mental and physical well-being. These interventions, which involve skin-to-skin contact with a caregiver, have been shown to improve outcomes for both babies and adults, with benefits including reduced depression, anxiety, and stress hormones, as well as increased weight gain for babies. The effects of touch are comparable for both age groups, and recent guidelines from the World Health Organization recommend immediate skin-to-skin care for premature babies over traditional incubator care due to the proven benefits. Overall, the evidence suggests that the need for touch does not disappear with age.

    • Touch and Emotional WellbeingTouch, especially skin-to-skin contact, plays a crucial role in emotional and psychological wellbeing by triggering hormonal responses and creating feelings of safety, love, and connection. This effect is not limited to infants, as adults also experience benefits from touch.

      Physical touch, especially in the first moments of life, plays a crucial role in our emotional and psychological wellbeing. Skin-to-skin contact between a newborn and their mother triggers hormonal responses that make the baby feel safe, loved, and connected. This bonding effect is not limited to infants, as adults also experience a release of oxytocin during touch, leading to feelings of comfort and connection. Mike shared a personal story about the impact of a hug during a stressful time, highlighting the importance of touch in holding us together emotionally. The discussion underscores the significance of touch as a basic human need, and how it shapes our experiences throughout our lives.

    • Touch frequencyRegular touch, especially hugs, plays a crucial role in emotional and physical well-being, regardless of duration, and is particularly important for older adults due to increased fragility.

      The frequency of touch, specifically hugs, is more important for the emotional and physical well-being than the duration. This was concluded from a meta-analysis of various touch interventions. Although brief hugs are common and meaningful, longer hugs can also be significant as they may signal deeper emotions and connections. Research suggests that this need for physical human contact, known as "skin hunger," is particularly important for older adults due to their increased physical fragility. A study involving adults holding hands and hugging their partners found that these warm contacts reduced stress levels as indicated by lower blood pressure and heart rate during a public speaking task. Overall, it seems that touch, from birth to death, plays a crucial role in our lives and should be consensually practiced. Further research is needed to explore the specific effects of different hug durations.

    • Touch and stress reductionTouch, whether it's through a hug or holding hands, reduces stress and anxiety by triggering feelings of security and love, and is essential for a safe and cared-for environment.

      Touch, whether it's through a hug or holding hands, can help reduce stress and anxiety by triggering feelings of security and love. This concept is supported by research, including studies on primates and human infants, which show that touch deprivation can register as a threat, while comforting touch registers as security. The famous Harry Harlow experiment with infant monkeys demonstrated the importance of both meeting basic needs and experiencing tender love. As humans, we have a primitive instinct for love and tenderness, and touch is an essential way we know we are in a safe and cared-for environment. While some people may have experienced less touch growing up, it's never too late to incorporate more hugs and embraces into our lives to reap the benefits. Additionally, touch is a truthful sense, and we believe and trust the messages it sends to us.

    • Touch and CommunicationTouch is a fundamental form of communication and connection for all living organisms, conveying love and emotion, and essential for sensing the world. Infants benefit greatly from skin-to-skin contact, and adults can improve mood and reduce stress through regular touch.

      Touch is a fundamental and honest form of communication and connection for all living organisms, including humans. From the most primitive single-celled organisms to humans, touch is essential for sensing the world and navigating our environment. The importance of touch is evident in the way it conveys love and emotion, as seen in the hug of a parent to a child. Research shows that infants benefit greatly from skin-to-skin contact, and even adults can reap the rewards of regular touch, such as improved mood and reduced stress. The idea of an "eight hugs a day, eight day challenge" is a fun and specific way to prioritize and measure this important form of connection. It's a reminder that touch is not only a basic need for infants, but also for adults, and that it can be easily incorporated into our daily lives with the simple goal of eight hugs a day.

    • Embracing discomfort and physical touchEmbracing discomfort and physical touch with strangers can lead to personal growth and new experiences, as shown in studies and personal stories.

      Embracing discomfort and physical touch, even with strangers, can lead to personal growth and new experiences. Carmen Rasmussen Herbert, a journalist and reality TV survivor, emphasized the importance of this in today's conversation. Mike and Angela discussed the study of Harry Harlow, which showed infant monkeys preferring the comfort of a cloth mother over a wire one, outside of nursing time. Marissa Reinholtz, a listener from Norway, shared her experience of persevering through cultural discomfort during her exchange student year and learning to embrace her accent. Megan O'Sullivan, another listener, spoke about the challenges of tree planting and pushing through discomfort to reach personal goals, but also the importance of recognizing when discomfort turns into pain. Overall, the importance of embracing discomfort and physical touch was a common theme in today's conversation.

    • Freakonomics Radio NetworkThe Freakonomics Radio Network produces popular podcasts like Freakonomics Radio, People I Mostly Admire, and The Economics of Everyday Things, with NSQ being one of them. It's known for exploring the hidden side of everything and new episodes can be found on Stitcher.

      Learning from this episode of No Stupid Questions is that the show is part of the Freakonomics Radio Network, which includes popular podcasts like Freakonomics Radio, People I Mostly Admire, and The Economics of Everyday Things. The episode was produced by Julie Kanfer, with senior production by Rebecca Lee Douglas and production assistance from Lyric Baudage. It was mixed by Greg Rippen and featured research assistance from Daniel Moritz-Raphson. The theme song was composed by Luis Guerra. Listeners can follow the show on Twitter @NSQ_show and Facebook @NSQ, and submit questions for future episodes to NSQ@freakonomics.com. The Freakonomics Radio Network explores the hidden side of everything, and new episodes can be found on Stitcher. So, keep listening to uncover the unexpected answers to life's most intriguing questions.

    Recent Episodes from No Stupid Questions

    209. Why Do We Settle?

    209. Why Do We Settle?

    Why does the U.S. use Fahrenheit when Celsius is better? Would you quit your job if a coin flip told you to? And how do you get an entire country to drive on the other side of the road?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Christian Crandall, professor of psychology at the University of Kansas.
      • Stephen Dubner, host of Freakonomics Radio and co-author of the Freakonomics books.
      • Scott Eidelman, professor of psychology at the University of Arkansas.
      • David Hume, 18th century Scottish philosopher.
      • Ellen Langer, professor of psychology at Harvard University.
      • Steve Levitt, professor emeritus of economics at the University of Chicago, host of People I (Mostly) Admire, and co-author of the Freakonomics books.
      • John McWhorter, professor of linguistics, English, and comparative literature at Columbia University.
      • Mark Twain, 19-20th century American writer.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usSeptember 01, 2024

    208. Can A.I. Companions Replace Human Connection?

    208. Can A.I. Companions Replace Human Connection?

    What happens when machines become funnier, kinder, and more empathetic than humans? Do robot therapists save lives? And should Angela credit her virtual assistant as a co-author of her book?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Robert Cialdini, professor emeritus of psychology at Arizona State University.
      • Reid Hoffman, co-founder and executive chairman of LinkedIn; co-founder and board member of Inflection AI.
      • Kazuo Ishiguro, novelist and screenwriter.
      • Ethan Mollick, professor of management and co-director of the Generative A.I. Lab at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Ann Patchett, author.
      • Kevin Roose, technology columnist for The New York Times and co-host of the podcast Hard Fork.
      • Niko Tinbergen, 20th-century Dutch biologist and ornithologist.
      • Lyle Ungar, professor of computer and information science at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • E. B. White, 20th-century American author.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 25, 2024

    207. How Clearly Do You See Yourself?

    207. How Clearly Do You See Yourself?

    Do you see yourself the same way others see you? What’s the difference between self-perception and self-awareness? And why do Mike and Angela both hate fishing?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Luis von Ahn, co-founder and C.E.O. of Duolingo; former chair of the board at Character Lab.
      • Paul DePodesta, chief strategy officer of the Cleveland Browns; former baseball executive.
      • Daniel Kahneman, professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at Princeton University.
      • Michel de Montaigne, 16th-century French philosopher.
      • Barbara Tversky, professor emerita of psychology at Stanford University and professor of psychology and education at Teachers College, Columbia University.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 18, 2024

    Why Do People Get Scammed? (Replay)

    Why Do People Get Scammed? (Replay)

    What makes a con succeed? Does snake oil actually work? And just how gullible is Angela?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Robert Cialdini, professor emeritus of psychology and marketing at Arizona State University.
      • Yaniv Hanoch, professor of decision sciences at University of Southampton.
      • Hugo Mercier, research scientist at the French National Centre for Scientific Research.
      • George Parker, 19-20th century American con artist.
      • Clark Stanley, 19th century American herbalist and quack doctor.
      • William Thompson, 19th century American criminal and con artist.
      • Danny Wallace, British filmmaker, comedian, writer, and actor.
      • Stacey Wood, professor of psychology at Scripps College.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 11, 2024

    206. When Is It Time to Step Aside?

    206. When Is It Time to Step Aside?

    Should government jobs have mandatory retirement ages? Is it foolish to care about your legacy? And why did Jason always call Angela’s father “Dr. Lee”?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • William Bridges, professor emeritus of American literature at Mills College, consultant, and author.
      • Arthur Brooks, professor of leadership at Harvard University.
      • Jimmy Carter, former President of the United States and founder of the Carter Center.
      • Erik Erikson, 20th-century psychoanalyst.
      • Craig Fox, professor of management at the University of California, Los Angeles.
      • Daniel Kahneman, professor emeritus of psychology and public affairs at Princeton University.
      • Mitt Romney, U.S. Senator from Utah.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usAugust 04, 2024

    205. Where Do Values Come From?

    205. Where Do Values Come From?

    Do you get your principles from your parents — or in spite of them? Is there anything wrong with valuing conformity? And why doesn’t McDonald’s sell salads? 

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Erika James, dean of the Wharton School of Business at the University of Pennsylvania.
      • Olivia Rodrigo, singer-songwriter.
      • Shalom Schwartz, professor emeritus of psychology at the Hebrew ‎‎University of Jerusalem.
      • Thomas Talhelm, professor of behavioral science at the University of Chicago Booth School of Business.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usJuly 28, 2024

    204. What Happens When You’re Cut Off From All Human Contact?

    204. What Happens When You’re Cut Off From All Human Contact?

    How is the brain affected by solitary confinement? How would you deal with being stranded on a deserted island? And do baby monkeys make the best therapists? 

     

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usJuly 21, 2024

    203. Do You Need a Hug?

    203. Do You Need a Hug?

    Do humans need touch to survive? Do any of us get enough touch throughout our lives? And why doesn’t Angela want to hug anyone for eight seconds?

     

    • SOURCES:

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usJuly 14, 2024

    How Effective Are Ultimatums? (Replay)

    How Effective Are Ultimatums? (Replay)

    How final is a final offer, really? Does anonymity turn nice people into jerks? And should you tell your crush that you dreamed about marrying them?

     

    • SOURCES:
      • Max Bazerman, professor of business administration at Harvard Business School.
      • Deepak Malhotra, professor of business administration at Harvard Business School.
      • Elon Musk, owner and C.T.O. of X Corp (formerly Twitter), C.E.O. of Space X, and C.E.O. of Tesla.
      • John Krasinski, actor and filmmaker.

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usJuly 07, 2024

    202. Why Can’t We Tolerate Discomfort?

    202. Why Can’t We Tolerate Discomfort?

    Are we using technology to make ourselves numb? What’s the downside of air conditioning? And was Angela the most annoying person in her college classes?

     

     

     

    No Stupid Questions
    en-usJune 30, 2024