Logo

    267 | Benjamin Breen on Margaret Mead, Psychedelics, and Utopia

    enFebruary 26, 2024
    How does Indeed improve the hiring process for employers?
    What features does Rocket Money offer for managing finances?
    Who discovered LSD and when was it first introduced?
    What was the focus of American scientists during World War 2?
    How did the study of psychedelics influence ethical debates post-war?

    Podcast Summary

    • Streamline hiring with IndeedLeverage Indeed's large user base and advanced matching engine to efficiently find and hire high-quality candidates. Additional features like scheduling, screening, and messaging expedite the process.

      When it comes to hiring, instead of actively searching for candidates, utilizing a platform like Indeed can help streamline the process and connect you with high-quality candidates more efficiently. With over 350 million monthly visitors and a matching engine, Indeed is a go-to solution for employers looking to fill positions quickly and effectively. Additionally, the platform offers features for scheduling, screening, and messaging to help expedite the hiring process. Furthermore, Indeed delivers the highest quality matches compared to other job sites, as agreed upon by 93% of employers. On a different note, managing subscriptions can be a significant drain on personal finances. Rocket Money, a personal finance app, can help identify and cancel unwanted subscriptions, monitor spending, and even lower bills. With over 5 million users and an average savings of $720 per year, Rocket Money is a valuable tool for those looking to regain control of their finances.

    • The history of psychedelics and consciousness explorationFrom William James' early studies of consciousness-altering substances to the modern exploration of LSD's effects, psychedelics have a rich history that challenges societal norms and pushes the boundaries of human understanding.

      The study of psychedelic drugs, including LSD, has deep roots in anthropology and the exploration of the relationship between machines, people, and consciousness. Before the term "psychedelic" was even coined in 1957, researchers like William James had already used substances like peyote for consciousness exploration. The discovery of LSD by Albert Hoffman in the 1930s did not immediately change the discourse, as Hoffman kept his findings to himself for several years. Instead, mescaline, derived from peyote, was the first synthetic psychedelic used in scientific studies. The history of psychedelics is marked by moral panics and debates about the boundaries between humans and machines, foreshadowing current discussions on artificial intelligence. The study of psychedelics and their impact on consciousness has a long and complex history that continues to shape our understanding of the mind and the world around us.

    • Exploring the Mind: The Age of Psychedelics and AnthropologyWilliam James, Margaret Mead, and Gregory Bateson led research on psychedelics during the late 19th and early 20th centuries, contributing to modernism, Freudian psychology, and the foundation of various scientific fields, including AI research.

      The late 19th and early 20th centuries saw a significant interest in altering the human mind and understanding its workings, which led to extensive research on psychedelic drugs like mescaline. This era, often associated with modernism and the rise of Freudian psychology, saw influential figures like William James experimenting with these substances in pursuit of new insights into the nature of reality and mental health. Among these pioneers were Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson, two of the most influential anthropologists of the 20th century. Their work, which contributed to the global scientific culture emerging after World War 2, laid the groundwork for various fields, including artificial intelligence research. Despite their groundbreaking contributions, their reputations have faced challenges, but their impact on science and our understanding of the world remains significant.

    • Pioneering anthropologist Margaret Mead's groundbreaking careerMargaret Mead, a renowned anthropologist, expanded scientific understanding of human behavior and consciousness through her research on Samoan and Omaha cultures, and later explored the effects of psychedelics on humans.

      Margaret Mead, a pioneering anthropologist, had a groundbreaking career that transcended traditional disciplinary boundaries. She began her research on Samoan and Omaha cultures, aiming to expand scientific understanding of human behavior and consciousness. However, her interests broadened to include the effects of psychedelics on humans, which stemmed from her early study of peyote use among a Native American tribe. Mead saw her life as a series of intellectual partnerships, working closely with multiple husbands and Ruth Benedict, another leading anthropologist. Her relationship with Gregory Bateson, a fellow scientist and polymath, became particularly complex, involving a love triangle and overlapping fields of study. Mead's larger intellectual mission was to create a science of expanded consciousness, believing that science could help humanity better understand both our evolutionary history and our ability to consciously shape our own evolution. Bateson, already deeply embedded in scientific history, embodied the trend of scientists exploring interdisciplinary studies during the 1920s and 1930s.

    • Margaret Mead: Agent of Change in ScienceMargaret Mead, an influential anthropologist, advocated for a more inclusive view of sexuality and challenged societal norms, inspiring a vision of a more open-minded, globally connected scientific community.

      Margaret Mead, a groundbreaking anthropologist of the 20th century, believed in the transformative power of science to help humanity evade destructive conflicts and expand beyond Earth's limits. She advocated for a more inclusive view of sexuality and challenged societal norms, drawing on examples from other cultures. Mead's work was particularly influential during a time when the world was recovering from wars and the industrial revolution, making the idea of shaping humanity for the better less outlandish. She saw herself as an agent of change, conducting science not just for the present but for future generations. Despite the challenges and skepticism, Mead's vision of a more open-minded, globally connected scientific community continues to inspire today.

    • Exploring the origins of psychedelic therapy and scienceAnthropologists Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson, influenced by their friend Geoffrey Gorer's mescaline experiments, laid the groundwork for psychedelic therapy and science in the 1930s, leading to its development as a means for healing and utopian visions post-WW2.

      The intellectual foundations of psychedelic therapy and science can be traced back to the 1930s, long before the popularization of psychoactive drugs like LSD and mescaline. Anthropologists Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson, along with their contemporaries, were deeply interested in altered states of consciousness, particularly trance. They believed that consciousness could be transferred to other entities or even imagined selves. This fascination with the transference of self in trance states was influenced by their friend Geoffrey Gorer, who had explored the effects of mescaline. The idea that mescaline could unlock the mind and provide insights into other forms of altered consciousness percolated among scientists studying trance and hypnosis. After World War 2, this foundation led to the development of psychedelic science as a means to heal and bring about a utopian future, despite the fact that Mead and Bateson themselves did not actively explore psychedelics before the war.

    • Historical role of psychedelics as social toolsAnthropologist Margaret Mead recognized the potential of psychedelics as social tools for connection and societal cohesion, a perspective that remains relevant today as interest in their benefits resurfaces

      Psychedelics and trans-like states have played a significant role in various societies throughout history as social tools for connection and societal cohesion. Margaret Mead, a pioneering anthropologist, was one of the first to recognize this potential, viewing the use of substances like peyote as a response to the disruptions of modernity. However, the exploration of the mind and its potential benefits were largely overshadowed by World War 2 and the ethical dilemmas faced by scientists regarding the use of their knowledge for the war effort. Despite this, the interest in the social role of psychedelics is resurfacing, and Mead's perspective on their potential as a tool for societal benefit remains compelling.

    • The Mind in World War 2: Psychological Warfare and PropagandaDuring WW2, scientists studied the role of mass hypnosis and propaganda as weapons. American researchers investigated Hitler's hypnotic power and German propaganda films. Post-war, ethical concerns arose with Operation Paperclip and psychochemical warfare.

      During World War 2, the scientific understanding of the mind and consciousness became a significant component of the war effort, specifically in the realm of psychological warfare and propaganda. American scientists, including Mead and Bateson, were intrigued and disturbed by the potential of mass hypnosis and the use of propaganda as a weapon. They studied the role of Hitler as a hypnotic figure and even investigated specific German propaganda films for hypnotic elements. This research was taken seriously, although not on the same scale as projects like the Manhattan Project. However, the ethical implications became more complicated in the post-war era, with the recruitment of Nazi scientists through Operation Paperclip and the emergence of psychochemical warfare. Despite the idealistic motives of the scientists involved, the use of psychological warfare raised ethical questions that would continue to be debated in the years to come.

    • Cold War-era scrutiny of scientists' personal lives influenced US psychedelic researchDuring the Cold War, the US government investigated scientists for their sexual orientation, leading to controversy over their involvement in psychedelic research and collaboration with defense and intelligence agencies.

      During the Cold War era, the US government's interest in psychedelics was influenced by geopolitical motives and investigations into scientists' personal lives. Margaret Mead, a prominent anthropologist, faced scrutiny for her bisexuality during the Lavender Scare, a time when the US government investigated employees for potential security threats based on their sexual orientation. This period saw a split between Mead and Gregory Bateson over the role of scientists in war efforts. While Bateson opposed scientists' involvement, Mead maintained ties with the Department of Defense and the CIA, collaborating with LSD researcher Harold Abramson. The controversy over the naming of the James Webb Space Telescope stems from allegations against NASA administrator James Webb regarding the handling of NASA employees suspected of homosexuality during this time. Although there is documentation suggesting Bateson's involvement in exploring the potential uses of psychedelics and other methods in interrogation situations, it was not related to LSD. The Office of Strategic Services, a precursor to the CIA, played a significant role in these investigations.

    • Exploring Japanese and German psychology during WW2 using hypnosis and altered states of consciousnessAnthropologists and researchers delved into altered states during WW2 to understand enemy psychology, influencing POW interrogation techniques and truth drug research.

      During World War 2, anthropologists like Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson, along with researchers like Jeffrey Gore and James Alexander Hamilton, explored the role of hypnosis and altered states of consciousness in understanding Japanese and German psychology. This research was significant as the US was setting up POW camps and could have influenced interrogation techniques. Simultaneously, George Hunter White, a notorious narcotics cop, was conducting truth drug research for the OSS. The connections between these groups and their shared interests in altered states of consciousness are intriguing but largely unknown due to destroyed documents during the 1970s. Margaret Mead continued to advocate for scientists working towards utopia in her personal and professional life despite potential social and legal disapproval of her romantic entanglements. This period of research, which included the exploration of truth drugs and altered states of consciousness, is a fascinating yet complex chapter in the history of both anthropology and the intelligence community.

    • Alison Mead's plan to use LSD for research purposesDespite popular belief, psychedelics do not enhance creativity or facilitate clear communication, as shown in Alison Mead's research intentions and scientific evidence.

      During the 1950s, Alison Mead, a brilliant scientist and bisexual woman, was intrigued by the potential of LSD to help remove fear of homosexuality and enhance creativity. She planned to take LSD for research purposes but ultimately decided against it due to concerns about revealing personal information that could harm her career. The belief that psychedelics could enhance creativity or function as truth drugs was a misconception, as research suggests they do not raise cognitive abilities or facilitate clear communication. My personal experience and scientific evidence support this notion. Despite the popular belief that psychedelics can lead to greater creativity or clarity, the reality is that they do not enhance cognitive function or facilitate effective communication.

    • Exploring psychedelics can broaden perspective and provide valuable insightsExploring psychedelics can offer unique insights into the mind and consciousness, benefiting individuals who spend a lot of time thinking about the mind, and showing promise in therapeutic uses for mental ruts like depression and creative blocks.

      Exploring psychedelics can provide valuable insights into the nature of the mind and consciousness, even if it doesn't significantly change one's life or work. William James, a pioneer in this field, found that experimenting with altered states of consciousness broadened his perspective and made him more aware of the various possibilities of subjective experience. This can be particularly beneficial for individuals who spend a lot of time thinking about their own or others' minds, such as neuroscientists, psychiatrists, or philosophers. Additionally, psychedelics have shown promise in therapeutic uses, particularly in helping individuals break out of mental ruts, such as creative blocks or depression. While they may not be suitable for everyone or in all situations, they can offer a unique and valuable perspective. For instance, Albert Hibbs, a physicist and Feynman's doctoral student, exchanged letters with Oscar Janiger about their experiences with LSD, which included insights on philosophy and creativity.

    • Exploring the Unconventional: Hibbs and Lilly's Scientific JourneysIn the mid-to-late 20th century, scientists like Al Hibbs and John C. Lilly challenged conventional norms, using LSD and brain-computer interfaces to expand knowledge, funded by major institutions.

      The world of science in the mid-to-late 20th century was not as rigid and conventional as we might assume. Two intriguing figures, Al Hibbs and John C. Lilly, provide evidence of this. Hibbs, a physicist who was meant to be an astronaut, reportedly had a transformative experience after taking LSD, which led him to insights that he believed could benefit his research. A potential encounter between Hibbs and Richard Feynman regarding this psychedelic experience remains unclear. Meanwhile, Lilly, a medical doctor and physiologist, was an early pioneer in brain-computer interfaces and became fascinated by dolphin consciousness. Funded by NASA, the US Navy, and the NSF, Lilly's project aimed to communicate with dolphins, demonstrating the scientific community's openness to unconventional approaches during this era. These stories remind us that scientific exploration often involves pushing boundaries and embracing the unknown.

    • Exploring Interdisciplinary Frontiers in the 1960sAnthropologists like Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson, cybernetics pioneers, and astronomers like Carl Sagan collaborated, pushing boundaries with unconventional research methods, including Lilly's work with dolphins and LSD, and speculation about extraterrestrial life.

      The 1960s saw a fascinating intersection of disciplines and unconventional research methods, particularly in the fields of anthropology, cybernetics, and the search for extraterrestrial life. John C. Lilly's work with dolphins and LSD, while controversial, was part of a larger trend towards interdisciplinary collaboration and the exploration of new ideas. Margaret Mead and Gregory Bateson, known for their anthropological work, played significant roles in the founding of cybernetics, a field that would later influence artificial intelligence research. Carl Sagan, an astronomer, was intrigued by Lilly's work and even started a secret society, the Order of the Dolphin, with other scientists interested in communication with alien life forms. While Lilly's dolphin research ultimately proved unsuccessful, it represents an important chapter in the history of scientific exploration and collaboration. Additionally, anecdotes like Mead's friendship with John von Neumann and his speculation about the universe being a computer simulation highlight the groundbreaking ideas that emerged from this period. Overall, this era was marked by a sense of freedom and a willingness to explore new ideas, despite the risks and uncertainties involved.

    • The impact of utopian visions and politics on psychedelic researchThe history of psychedelic research was influenced by utopian visions and politics, leading to missed opportunities for broader societal acceptance and exploration as medicine instead of a niche topic for mystical experiences.

      The history of psychedelic research and its association with utopian visions, the counterculture, and polarizing politics significantly impacted its development and acceptance in society. Margaret Mead's early discussions on the computational mind and the foundations of computer science brought together influential figures like Claude Shannon and Heinrich Kluver at cybernetics conferences. However, the utopian visions did not fully materialize, and the 1960s marked a turning point. The shift in public discourse around psychedelics, partly due to defensive backlash against figures like Timothy Leary, led to their prohibition and association with a specific subculture. This missed opportunity for broader societal acceptance and exploration of psychedelics as a medicine instead of a niche topic for mystical experiences significantly limited their potential impact. Figures like Cary Grant and Claire Boothe Luce, who publicly endorsed psychedelic therapy in the 1950s, demonstrate a time when psychedelics were not polarized, and their acceptance was more widespread.

    • The influence of Gregory Bateson and Margaret Mead on psychedelic researchThe story of psychedelic research highlights the importance of vivid utopian thinking in science. Instead of waiting passively for a magical future, we should strive for achievable, practical, and broad-based good through science in collaboration with other factors.

      The history of psychedelic research could have unfolded differently if influential figures like Gregory Bateson and Margaret Mead had a more significant impact on public discourse. Their work could have led to more responsible and extensive study of psychedelics instead of the panic and eventual ban. The split between those who embraced the counterculture and those who distanced themselves from it played a role in this outcome. A deeper lesson from this story is the importance of vivid utopian thinking in science. Rather than passive waiting for a magical future, we should strive for achievable, practical, and broad-based good that can be achieved through science in collaboration with other factors. This perspective can help us avoid both the pitfalls of unrealistic utopianism and cynicism.

    • Lessons from the past: Empirical Utopianism and the Dangers of Scientific ReligionLearn from the past's idealism and optimism, but also be aware of potential dangers like scientists as religious leaders and the need for careful introduction of new innovations

      We can learn valuable lessons from individuals of the past, specifically those from the generation between 1919 and 1980, who lived in a world marked by both extreme poverty and significant technological advancements. Their grounded idealism and optimism, often referred to as empirical or practical utopianism, is something we could benefit from today. However, it's essential to remember the negative lessons as well. One such lesson is the potential dangers of scientists becoming religious leaders and the importance of considering the social and cultural implications when introducing new innovations, such as psychedelic drugs, into society. The anthropological approach, which involves careful and staged introduction, can help us avoid the pitfalls of the "magic bullet" mentality. As we move towards the likely legalization of psychedelics in the next decade, it's crucial to remember these lessons and approach the process with thoughtful consideration.

    Recent Episodes from Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

    288 | Max Richter on the Meaning of Classical Music Today

    288 | Max Richter on the Meaning of Classical Music Today

    It wasn't that long ago, historically speaking, that you might put on your tuxedo or floor-length evening gown to go out and hear a live opera or symphony. But today's world is faster, more technologically connected, and casual. Is there still a place for classical music in the contemporary environment? Max Richter, whose new album In a Landscape releases soon, proves that there is. We talk about what goes into making modern classical music, how musical styles evolve, and why every note should count.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/09/09/288-max-richter-on-the-meaning-of-classical-music-today/

    Max Richter trained in composition and piano at Edinburgh University, at the Royal Academy of Music, and with Luciano Berio in Florence. He was a co-founder of the ensemble Piano Circus. His first solo album, "Memoryhouse," was released in 2002. He has since released numerous solo albums, as well as extensive work on soundtracks for film and television, ballet, opera, and collaborations with visual artists.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | September 2024

    AMA | September 2024

    Welcome to the September 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with AMA questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/09/02/ama-september-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    287 | Jean-Paul Faguet on Institutions and the Legacy of History

    287 | Jean-Paul Faguet on Institutions and the Legacy of History

    One common feature of complex systems is sensitive dependence on initial conditions: a small change in how systems begin evolving can lead to large differences in their later behavior. In the social sphere, this is a way of saying that history matters. But it can be hard to quantify how much certain specific historical events have affected contemporary conditions, because the number of variables is so large and their impacts are so interdependent. Political economist Jean-Paul Faguet and collaborators have examined one case where we can closely measure the impact today of events from centuries ago: how Colombian communities are still affected by 16th-century encomienda, a colonial forced-labor institution. We talk about this and other examples of the legacy of history.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/26/287-jean-paul-faguet-on-institutions-and-the-legacy-of-history/

    Jean-Paul Faguet received a Ph.D. in Political Economy and an M.Sc. in Economics from the London School of Economics, and an Master of Public Policy from the Kennedy School of Government at Harvard. He is currently Professor of the Political Economy of Development at LSE. He serves as the Chair of the Decentralization Task Force for the Initiative for Policy Dialogue. Among his awards are the W.J.M. Mackenzie Prize for best political science book.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    286 | Blaise Agüera y Arcas on the Emergence of Replication and Computation

    286 | Blaise Agüera y Arcas on the Emergence of Replication and Computation

    Understanding how life began on Earth involves questions of chemistry, geology, planetary science, physics, and more. But the question of how random processes lead to organized, self-replicating, information-bearing systems is a more general one. That question can be addressed in an idealized world of computer code, initialized with random sequences and left to run. Starting with many such random systems, and allowing them to mutate and interact, will we end up with "lifelike," self-replicating programs? A new paper by Blaise Agüera y Arcas and collaborators suggests that the answer is yes. This raises interesting questions about whether computation is an attractor in the space of relevant dynamical processes, with implications for the origin and ubiquity of life.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/19/286-blaise-aguera-y-arcas-on-the-emergence-of-replication-and-computation/

    Blaise Agüera y Arcas received a B.A. in physics from Princeton University. He is currently a vice-president of engineering at Google, leader of the Cerebra team, and a member of the Paradigms of Intelligence team. He is the author of the books Ubi Sunt and Who Are We Now?, and the upcoming What Is Intelligence?


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    285 | Nate Silver on Prediction, Risk, and Rationality

    285 | Nate Silver on Prediction, Risk, and Rationality

    Being rational necessarily involves engagement with probability. Given two possible courses of action, it can be rational to prefer the one that could possibly result in a worse outcome, if there's also a substantial probability for an even better outcome. But one's attitude toward risk -- averse, tolerant, or even seeking -- also matters. Do we work to avoid the worse possible outcome, even if there is potential for enormous reward? Nate Silver has long thought about probability and prediction, from sports to politics to professional poker. In his his new book On The Edge: The Art of Risking Everything, Silver examines a set of traits characterizing people who welcome risks.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/12/285-nate-silver-on-prediction-risk-and-rationality/

    Nate Silver received a B.A. in economics from the University of Chicago. He worked as a baseball analyst, developing the PECOTA statistical system (Player Empirical Comparison and Optimization Test Algorithm). He later founded the FiveThirtyEight political polling analysis site. His first book, The Signal and the Noise, was awarded the Phi Beta Kappa Society Book Award in Science. He is the co-host (with Maria Konnikova) of the Risky Business podcast.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | August 2024

    AMA | August 2024

    Welcome to the August 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/08/05/ama-august-2024/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon: https://www.patreon.com/seanmcarroll

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    284 | Doris Tsao on How the Brain Turns Vision Into the World

    284 | Doris Tsao on How the Brain Turns Vision Into the World

    The human brain does a pretty amazing job of taking in a huge amount of data from multiple sensory modalities -- vision, hearing, smell, etc. -- and constructing a coherent picture of the world, constantly being updated in real time. (Although perhaps in discrete moments, rather than continuously, as we learn in this podcast...) We're a long way from completely understanding how that works, but amazing progress has been made in identifying specific parts of the brain with specific functions in this process. Today we talk to leading neuroscientist Doris Tsao about the specific workings of vision, from how we recognize faces to how we construct a model of the world around us.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/29/284-doris-tsao-on-how-the-brain-turns-vision-into-the-world/

    Doris Tsao received her Ph.D. in neurobiology from Harvard University. She is currently a professor of molecular and cell biology, and a member of the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute, at the University of California, Berkeley. Among her awards are a MacArthur Fellowship, membership in the National Academy of Sciences, the Eppendorf and Science International Prize in Neurobiology, the National Institutes of Health Director’s Pioneer Award, the Golden Brain Award from the Minerva Foundation, the Perl-UNC Neuroscience Prize, and the Kavli Prize in Neuroscience.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    283 | Daron Acemoglu on Technology, Inequality, and Power

    283 | Daron Acemoglu on Technology, Inequality, and Power

    Change is scary. But sometimes it can all work out for the best. There's no guarantee of that, however, even when the change in question involves the introduction of a powerful new technology. Today's guest, Daron Acemoglu, is a political economist who has long thought about the relationship between economics and political institutions. In his most recent book (with Simon Johnson), Power and Progress: Our Thousand-Year Struggle Over Technology and Prosperity, he looks at how technological innovations affect the economic lives of ordinary people. We talk about how such effects are often for the worse, at least to start out, until better institutions are able to eventually spread the benefits more broadly.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/22/283-daron-acemoglu-on-technology-inequality-and-power/

    Daron Acemoglu received a Ph.D. in economics from the London School of Economics. He is currently Institute Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. He is a fellow of the National Academy of Sciences, the American Academy of Arts and Sciences, and the Econometric Society. Among his awards are the John Bates Clark Medal and the Nemmers Prize in Economics. In 2015, he was named the most cited economist of the past 10 years.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    282 | Joel David Hamkins on Puzzles of Reality and Infinity

    282 | Joel David Hamkins on Puzzles of Reality and Infinity

    The philosophy of mathematics would be so much easier if it weren't for infinity. The concept seems natural, but taking it seriously opens the door to counterintuitive results. As mathematician and philosopher Joel David Hamkins says in this conversation, when we say that the natural numbers are "0, 1, 2, 3, and so on," that "and so on" is hopelessly vague. We talk about different ways to think about the puzzles of infinity, how they might be resolved, and implications for mathematical realism.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/15/282-joel-david-hamkins-on-puzzles-of-reality-and-infinity/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Joel David Hamkins received his Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of California, Berkeley. He is currently the John Cardinal O'Hara Professor of Logic at the University of Notre Dame. He is a pioneer of the idea of the set theory multiverse. He is the top-rated user by reputation score on MathOverflow. He is currently working on The Book of Infinity, to be published by MIT Press.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Ask Me Anything | July 2024

    Ask Me Anything | July 2024

    Welcome to the July 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/07/08/ama-july-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Related Episodes

    82 | Robin Carhart-Harris on Psychedelics and the Brain

    82 | Robin Carhart-Harris on Psychedelics and the Brain

    The Convention on Psychotropic Substances was a 1971 United Nations treaty that placed strong restrictions on the use of psychedelic drugs — not only on personal use, but medical and scientific research as well. Along with restrictions placed by individual nations, it has been very difficult for scientists to study the effects of psychedelics on the brain, despite indications that they might have significant therapeutic potential. But this has gradually been changing, and researchers like Robin Carhart-Harris have begun to perform controlled experiments to see how psychedelics affect the brain, and what positive uses they might have. Robin and I talk about how psychedelics work, how they can help with conditions from addiction to depression, and how they can help people discover things about themselves.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Robin Carhart-Harris received his Ph.D. in psychopharmacology from the University of Bristol. He is currently the Director of the Centre for Psychedelic Research in the Department of Brain Sciences at Imperial College London, and holds an honorary position at the University of Oxford. His research involves functional brain imaging studies with psilocybin (magic mushrooms), LSD, MDMA (ecstasy) and DMT (ayahuasca), plus a clinical trial of psilocybin for treatment-resistant depression.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    225 | Michael Tomasello on The Social Origins of Cognition and Agency

    225 | Michael Tomasello on The Social Origins of Cognition and Agency

    Human beings have developed wondrous capacities to take in information about the world, mull it over, think about a suite of future implications, and decide on a course of action based on those deliberations. These abilities developed over evolutionary history for a variety of reasons and under a number of different pressures. But one crucially important aspect of their development is their social function. According to Michael Tomasello, we developed agency and cognition and even morality in order to better communicate and cooperate with our fellow humans. 

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Michael Tomasello received a Ph.D. in experimental psychology from the University of Georgia. He is currently the James Bonk Professor of Psychology & Neuroscience and Director of the Developmental Psychology Program at Duke University. He is a fellow of the National Academy of Sciences and the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Among his awards are the Distinguished Scientific Contribution Award from the American Psychological Association, the Wiley Prize in Psychology, and the Heineken Prize for Cognitive Science. His newest book is The Evolution of Agency: Behavioral Organization from Lizards to Humans.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    153 | John Preskill on Quantum Computers and What They’re Good For

    153 | John Preskill on Quantum Computers and What They’re Good For

    Depending on who you listen to, quantum computers are either the biggest technological change coming down the road or just another overhyped bubble. Today we’re talking with a good person to listen to: John Preskill, one of the leaders in modern quantum information science. We talk about what a quantum computer is and promising technologies for actually building them. John emphasizes that quantum computers are tailor-made for simulating the behavior of quantum systems like molecules and materials; whether they will lead to breakthroughs in cryptography or optimization problems is less clear. Then we relate the idea of quantum information back to gravity and the emergence of spacetime. (If you want to build and run your own quantum algorithm, try the IBM Quantum Experience.)

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    John Preskill received his Ph.D. in physics from Harvard University. He is currently the Richard P. Feynman Professor of Theoretical Physics at Caltech and the Davis Leadership Chair at the Institute for Quantum Information and Matter, as well as an Amazon Scholar at Amazon Web Services. Before moving into quantum information, he was a leading researcher in quantum field theory and black holes. He is the winner of multiple bets with Stephen Hawking.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    216 | John Allen Paulos on Numbers, Narratives, and Numeracy

    216 | John Allen Paulos on Numbers, Narratives, and Numeracy

    People have a complicated relationship to mathematics. We all use it in our everyday lives, from calculating a tip at a restaurant to estimating the probability of some future event. But many people find the subject intimidating, if not off-putting. John Allen Paulos has long been working to make mathematics more approachable and encourage people to become more numerate. We talk about how people think about math, what kinds of math they should know, and the role of stories and narrative to make math come alive. 

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    John Allen Paulos received his Ph.D. in mathematics from the University of Wisconsin, Madison. He is currently a professor of mathematics at Temple University. He s a bestselling author, and frequent contributor to publications such as ABCNews.com, the Guardian, and Scientific American. Among his awards are the Science Communication award from the American Association for the Advancement of Science and the Mathematics Communication Award from the Joint Policy Board of Mathematics. His new book is Who’s Counting? Uniting Numbers and Narratives with Stories from Pop Culture, Puzzles, Politics, and More.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    248 | Yejin Choi on AI and Common Sense

    248 | Yejin Choi on AI and Common Sense

    Over the last year, AI large-language models (LLMs) like ChatGPT have demonstrated a remarkable ability to carry on human-like conversations in a variety of different concepts. But the way these LLMs "learn" is very different from how human beings learn, and the same can be said for how they "reason." It's reasonable to ask, do these AI programs really understand the world they are talking about? Do they possess a common-sense picture of reality, or can they just string together words in convincing ways without any underlying understanding? Computer scientist Yejin Choi is a leader in trying to understand the sense in which AIs are actually intelligent, and why in some ways they're still shockingly stupid.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/08/28/248-yejin-choi-on-ai-and-common-sense/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Yejin Choi received a Ph.D. in computer science from Cornell University. She is currently the Wissner-Slivka Professor at the Paul G. Allen School of Computer Science & Engineering at the University of Washington and also a senior research director at AI2 overseeing the project Mosaic. Among her awards are a MacArthur fellowship and a fellow of the Association for Computational Linguistics.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.