Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Streamlining Hiring and Managing Finances with TechnologyIndeed simplifies hiring with 350M+ monthly visitors and features for scheduling, screening, and messaging. Rocket Money saves money by identifying and canceling unwanted subscriptions and monitoring spending.

      When it comes to hiring, instead of actively searching for candidates, utilizing platforms like Indeed can help streamline the process and deliver high-quality matches. Indeed, with over 350 million monthly visitors, offers a matching engine that helps employers find quality candidates efficiently. Moreover, the platform also offers features for scheduling, screening, and messaging, making it a comprehensive solution for hiring needs. Additionally, managing personal finances can be a daunting task, and many of us end up paying for unwanted subscriptions. Rocket Money, a personal finance app, can help identify and cancel these unwanted subscriptions, monitor spending, and even lower bills. With over 5 million users and an average savings of $720 per year, Rocket Money is a valuable tool for managing finances effectively. Another area where technology has made a significant impact is in the jewelry industry. Blue Nile offers beautiful lab-grown diamonds, which are independently graded and guaranteed, making them a cost-effective and eco-friendly alternative to natural diamonds. Lastly, the concept of the technological singularity, popularized by science fiction authors like Vernor Vinge and Ray Kurzweil, suggests that advances in technology will lead to a fundamental change in human existence. While the idea has been met with both enthusiasm and skepticism, it serves as a reminder of the potential for technological innovations to shape our future.

    • Jeffrey West discusses the increasing pace of innovation and the possibility of a technological singularityThe technological singularity, a potential phase transition in the pace of innovation, is a characteristic of physically observable systems and should be taken seriously due to the increasing rate of innovation and adoption

      Jeffrey West, a leading figure in complexity science, urged us to take seriously the idea of a technological singularity based on the increasing pace of innovation and adoption. He provided more objective data than before, showing that innovations are not only increasing but being adopted faster than ever before, with the example of ChatGPT's rapid adoption being a trend. West also emphasized that the singularity might be a harbinger of a phase transition, where the system changes dramatically to a different kind of thing, rather than ceasing to exist or blowing up. He drew parallels to phase transitions in physics, where physical quantities can go to infinity but still continue past the singularity. This suggests that we should take the possibility of a singularity seriously, as it is a characteristic of physically observable systems.

    • Contemplating Future Changes in Technology and SocietyAs population density grows, the rate of innovation increases, leading to profound changes. Even during periods of apparent stagnation, important changes can still be occurring. It's crucial to consider and prepare for future possibilities, despite their uncertainty.

      Human history has seen significant shifts in the way we live and innovate, from the development of language and agriculture to the scientific and industrial revolutions. These shifts took place over long periods of time, but brought about profound changes. The rate of innovation increases as population density grows, leading to more ideas being shared and developed. However, it's important to remember that even during periods of apparent stagnation, important changes can still be occurring. The future may bring about another major shift, and it's crucial that we consider and prepare for these possibilities, even if they are uncertain. This discussion serves as an invitation to contemplate the potential future changes in technology and society, and to do so responsibly and seriously.

    • Population growth follows a logistic curve, not a straight lineRecognize population growth follows a pattern, not a constant rate, and be cautious when extrapolating current growth rates. Learn new languages to foster innovation and exchange.

      While population growth has been increasing since the agricultural shift, it has not been constant. The rate of growth has accelerated significantly during periods of major technological advancements like the Scientific and Industrial Revolutions. However, it's important to remember that extrapolating current growth rates into the future can be dangerous as growth rates rarely continue at the same pace indefinitely. Instead, growth often follows a logistic or sigmoid curve, where it starts off slowly, then grows exponentially, and eventually levels off. Additionally, there's a possibility of growth that is faster than exponential, known as a singularity. It's essential to be aware of these patterns and be cautious when making assumptions based on current growth rates alone. Another key point is the importance of learning new languages, which can help facilitate cultural exchange and innovation. Babbel, a science-based language learning app, can help you get started quickly and effectively. Finally, it's worth noting that while exponential growth can occur in certain systems, it's not sustainable indefinitely due to the finite resources available on Earth.

    • Understanding mechanisms to avoid technological singularityWe can anticipate shifts in human behavior and reach new equilibriums to avoid infinite growth and potential singularity in technology

      The concept of a technological singularity, where certain mathematical curves of growth seemingly reach an infinite value in a finite time, is a possibility. However, Jeffrey West argues that we may be able to avoid such a singularity by understanding the underlying mechanisms driving these growth rates and anticipating shifts in human behavior. He uses the example of propane's phase transition to illustrate this idea. West emphasizes that we should consider the possibility of settling into a new equilibrium, despite the rapid technological changes we're experiencing. This idea of a new equilibrium, where there is stability despite the shifts, is important. It comes from the concept of equilibrium in physics and thermodynamics, where two objects at different temperatures settle into a common temperature. Similarly, in game theory, a Nash equilibrium is reached when all players have a strategy and cannot improve their results individually. The key is to think about the potential for stability in the face of technological change.

    • Beyond individual actions: The role of societal structuresSocietal structures like laws, taxes, and consensus are crucial for driving significant societal change. While individual actions matter, they're not enough to address complex challenges like the environment and technology.

      Individual values and actions, while important, are not enough to drive significant societal change. Instead, large-scale social constraints, such as laws, taxes, and consensus, are necessary to encourage individuals to act in a way that benefits the collective good. This perspective is particularly relevant when discussing the challenges and opportunities presented by technology. Regarding the environment, the speaker emphasizes that change is natural but human actions are currently causing harm at an alarming rate. Climate change is a pressing issue, and while modeling its complexities is challenging, the evidence suggests that the situation is worse than previously predicted. However, there is hope for progress, and it's essential to maintain optimism and explore potential solutions. This perspective challenges us to look beyond individual actions and consider the larger societal structures that can influence and guide behavior for the better. It's a call to action for collective efforts to address the complex challenges of our time, including the environmental crisis and the rapid advancement of technology.

    • Race to invest in renewable energy vs. temptation of fossil fuelsCities' energy efficiency and urbanization, population deceleration offer hope for a sustainable future with renewable energy

      Advancements in renewable energy are progressing faster than expected, offering viable alternatives to fossil fuels. However, there's a race to see if we can resist the temptation to continue relying on fossil fuels and instead invest in renewable energy sources. Another optimistic possibility lies in urbanization, as cities are more energy-efficient and the world is urbanizing at unprecedented rates. Population growth is also decelerating, and while some may view this as a concern, it could be a precursor to a sustainable future with a finite, comfortable population. The foundation of this discussion revolves around the idea that progress and sustainability are possible, despite the challenges.

    • Addressing Environmental Challenges and Biotech AdvancementsWe must tackle environmental issues, particularly climate change, while exploring biotech for healthier, longer lives. Soft landings in agriculture, food production, and habitable land are essential. Biotech may not increase lifespan, but it can improve overall health and well-being.

      While advancements in urban living, healthcare, and education may lead to a decrease in population growth, the current state of the environment, particularly climate change, poses significant challenges that require immediate attention. The climate crisis, though not an existential risk, will cause immense suffering and economic costs, leading to major changes in agriculture, food production, and habitable land. The transition towards a more sustainable future should aim for a soft landing, minimizing pain and loss. In the realm of biology, while advancements in longevity are promising, they may not lead to significant increases in maximum human lifespan. Instead, the focus should be on improving overall health and well-being. Overall, the key takeaway is that we must address the pressing environmental challenges and continue exploring the potential of biotechnology to enhance human life.

    • Impact of Gene Editing and Synthetic Biology on SocietyGene editing and synthetic biology are advancing technologies with potential societal impacts. While ethical concerns exist, focusing on responsible use and benefits can lead to solutions for health problems and societal challenges.

      While we may not be on the trajectory for humans living to be 200 in the next 100 years, gene editing and synthetic biology are technologies that are likely to have a major impact on our society. Despite concerns about designer babies and ethical dilemmas, it's unlikely that these advancements can be stopped. Instead, we should focus on how to use these technologies responsibly and for the greater good. Synthetic biology, in particular, has the potential to create new organisms that could solve health problems and address various challenges. It's essential to have open discussions about these possibilities and consider the potential benefits and risks. Ultimately, the future is uncertain, but being informed and prepared can help us navigate the changes ahead.

    • Advancements in Synthetic Biology and Brain-Computer InterfacesSynthetic biology offers potential solutions to health issues, reduces carbon emissions, and revolutionizes food production. Brain-computer interfaces enable humans to interact with machines, leading to a more intertwined future.

      Synthetic biology, with its potential to design organisms that can help address health issues, reduce carbon dioxide excess, and revolutionize food production, is a game-changer for human life. It's not just about editing genes or creating new organisms, but also about improving the lives of those who can benefit from these advancements. While there may be debates about the future of human existence, such as uploading consciousness into computers, the embodied nature of human beings suggests that such a transition would result in something fundamentally different, not a human being. Another significant development is the increasing connection between human brains and computers through brain-computer interfaces. This technology, which is already being explored by various companies, will allow humans to interact with machines in new ways, paving the way for a future where humans and machines are more intertwined. These advancements, much like the impact of mobile information technologies, will have a profound effect on human life.

    • Impact of Technology on Our LivesCell phones change communication and access to info, but overuse and unrealistic depictions can decrease happiness. Brain-computer interfaces may extend cognition, but AI's ways of thinking differ from humans, requiring careful consideration of impacts.

      Technology, specifically cell phones and brain-computer interfaces, is significantly impacting our lives in various ways, both positively and negatively. Cell phones have already changed the way we access information and communicate, but they have also been linked to decreased happiness among young people due to overuse and unrealistic depictions. Brain-computer interfaces, though still in development, have the potential to further extend human cognition and change the way we learn, perform, and interact. However, it's crucial to recognize that artificial intelligences have different ways of thinking than human beings and the concept of "general intelligence" may be misleading. As technology continues to advance, it's essential to consider its potential impacts on our lives and adapt accordingly.

    • AI is a tool, not a superintelligent agentAI will impact our lives greatly, but it's not human and doesn't possess human motivations or values. It's a tool that can help us learn and improve, but we must ensure it's used for good.

      While large language models like AI can sound very human and give the impression of intelligence, it's important to remember that they don't possess human motivations, desires, or values. They are tools that can help us in various ways, such as writing, designing, and learning, but they are not superintelligent agents with the ability to become superheroes or supervillains. Instead, we should focus on understanding the real influence AI will have on our lives and work to ensure it is used for good. AI will take over jobs that were previously done by humans, but it's not meant to replace humans entirely. It's a tool that can help us learn and improve, but it's up to us to ensure it's used in a beneficial way. The potential impact of AI on our lives is enormous, and it's essential to approach it with a clear understanding of what it is and what it isn't. It's not a superintelligent agent with human-like motivations, but rather a tool that can help us in various ways.

    • Exploring the Potential and Risks of AI-Generated ContentAI can revolutionize innovation and learning, but we must be cautious about potential dangers and risks, such as nonsensical information or lack of creativity, and continue researching to harness its power while minimizing risks.

      While we should be cautious about the potential dangers of AI-generated content, such as cookbooks full of nonsensical information that could lead to harm if followed too closely, we should also recognize the immense potential of AI to accelerate innovation and learning in various fields. AI can simulate complex trials, speed up the rate of progress, and even write books or news articles, although it currently struggles with interpreting and extrapolating beyond given data to create truly creative and provocative content. The future of AI's role in our lives is still uncertain, but it holds the promise of significant advancements in many areas, from drug development to literature. The challenge will be to harness the power of AI while minimizing the risks, and ongoing research and development will be crucial in achieving this goal.

    • Challenges in creating unpredictable and creative content and sustainability concerns with AIDespite advancements, AI struggles with unpredictable content and energy consumption raises sustainability concerns, while distinguishing human-generated from AI-generated content becomes increasingly difficult.

      While large language models and AI have advanced significantly, they still face challenges in creating unpredictable and creative content, as they are designed to mimic predictable patterns. Another issue is the enormous energy consumption required to run these advanced systems, which raises concerns about the sustainability of the AI revolution. Furthermore, the increasing difficulty in distinguishing human-generated content from AI-generated content poses a significant threat to the reliability and validity of information in the digital age. These challenges, while not insurmountable, require careful consideration and innovative solutions.

    • The Challenges of Distinguishing Truth from Falsehood in the Digital AgeIn the digital age, it's becoming increasingly difficult to distinguish truth from falsehood due to the ease of generating fake information and the collapse of traditional journalism. It's essential to consider the potential outcomes carefully and find ways to evaluate the credibility of information.

      As technology advances and we become increasingly exposed to information that aligns with our beliefs, while disregarding or ignoring contradictory information, we may enter a phase where it becomes difficult to distinguish truth from falsehood. This issue is exacerbated by the ease with which fake information can be generated. The collapse of traditional journalism and the shift towards distrusting information have significant implications for our future. It's uncertain what the end result will be, but it's essential to consider the potential outcomes carefully. The pessimistic scenario envisions a world where people only believe what they want to believe, and misinformation spreads unchecked. This could lead to a society where it's challenging to discern fact from fiction. The optimistic scenario, on the other hand, assumes that people will find ways to navigate this new information landscape and develop effective methods for evaluating the credibility of information. Ultimately, it's up to each of us to strike a balance between being open-minded and skeptical, and to be vigilant in our consumption of information.

    • Metaphorical interpretation of humans powering the MatrixHuman capacities metaphorically fuel society's structures, following a power law distribution with a 'fat tail' of wealthier individuals.

      That the concept of humans powering the Matrix in the movies can be seen metaphorically instead of literally. Metaphorically, human capacities fuel this fake reality, rather than our physical bodies creating energy. A physicist, Victor Yakovenko, drew a comparison between this idea and the distribution of energy in a box of gas, suggesting that wealth in society might follow a similar distribution. However, economists pointed out that this theory does not hold up, as there are more wealthy people than would be expected based on an exponential decay model. Instead, wealth distribution follows a power law with a "fat tail," meaning there are more wealthy individuals than one would anticipate. This metaphorical interpretation offers a thought-provoking perspective on the role of human capacities in powering the structures of society.

    • Wealth and income follow different distributions for lower and higher earnersLower earners follow Maxwell Boltzmann distribution, higher earners follow power law of decay. Different ways of earning money impact distribution and human happiness.

      The distribution of wealth and income follows different patterns. For lower earners, the distribution follows a Maxwell Boltzmann distribution, while for higher earners, it follows a power law of decay. This is due to the two different ways people earn money: additively, where wealth is limited by the number of goods or services sold, and multiplicatively, where wealth can be earned infinitely by selling the same good or service to many people. The efficiency of extracting profits from a large number of people can lead to tension between efficiency and human happiness.

    • Efficiency vs Consumer SatisfactionTechnological innovations can lead to market efficiency but may not ensure consumer satisfaction. Corporations and individuals may employ tactics like dynamic pricing and hidden fees, potentially leading to public backlash.

      Technological innovations can help markets reach a state of maximum efficiency, where resources are allocated effectively but may not necessarily result in happiness or satisfaction for all parties involved. Corporations and individuals aim to extract as much wealth as possible, leading to practices like dynamic pricing and hidden fees. However, these tactics can sometimes backfire and lead to public backlash. For instance, Wendy's attempted to implement dynamic pricing for lunch hours but faced backlash from customers who felt they were being charged more when they wanted to buy. Ultimately, while efficiency can be beneficial, it's essential to consider the potential impact on consumers and their satisfaction.

    • The cost of efficiency: individual happiness and powerlessnessTechnological advancements and economic systems can increase efficiency, but may negatively impact individual happiness and sense of powerlessness. Student loans and targeted ads are examples of this trade-off.

      Technological advancements and economic systems can lead to increased efficiency, but this efficiency comes at the cost of individual happiness and a sense of powerlessness. In the case of student loans, colleges have used this model to offer education to those who couldn't afford it, but the burden of debt post-graduation negatively impacts their ability to start their post-college life. Similarly, technology allows for more targeted ads and services, making transactions more efficient, but individuals may feel uneasy about the information being collected and used without their full consent. The growth of large institutions, whether in politics or retail, can make individuals feel powerless as their voices and suggestions may go unheard. It's essential to consider the balance between efficiency and individual happiness and the potential political and societal implications of technological advancements.

    • The Future Depends on Our Ability to Navigate Technological AdvancementsTechnology can either leave individuals feeling powerless or free them for creativity and enjoyment. A future with sustainable energy, shorter work weeks, and automated labor could lead to a more balanced and fulfilling life.

      As technology advances and the world becomes more interconnected, individuals may feel powerless and disconnected from their ability to influence society and their own lives. This can lead to pessimistic scenarios where individuals are merely existing and surviving, rather than thriving. However, an optimistic scenario exists where technology frees humans from mundane tasks, allowing them to focus on creativity and enjoyment. In this scenario, sustainable methods of energy and food production, a shorter work week, and the automation of labor could lead to a more balanced and fulfilling life for individuals. Ultimately, the future depends on our ability to navigate these technological advancements and ensure they benefit everyone, rather than leaving individuals feeling powerless and disconnected.

    • Exploring ways to use technology's excess value to improve societyTechnology's productivity gains could lead to reduced work hours, improved health and happiness, and stronger communities, but it's crucial to consider potential downsides and ensure positive outcomes.

      As technology advances and increases productivity, there are several ways society could use this excess value. One option is to make people's lives better by reducing work hours, such as implementing a 4-day work week. Another is to use biotechnology to improve health and happiness, ensuring a high quality of life for longer periods. Additionally, technology can help individuals find communities and support networks, fostering creativity and mutual understanding. However, it's crucial to consider potential downsides, such as the extraction of wealth during vulnerable moments, and ensure that technology is used to enhance our lives rather than alienate us. Ultimately, the choices we make will determine whether the increased productivity leads to a utopian or dystopian future.

    • Adapting to Technological AdvancementsTo minimize uncertainty and provide opportunities for people to thrive in the new technological landscape, it's essential to adapt and invent equitable systems. Use technology to enhance human capabilities and create a world where everyone can live fulfilling lives.

      Technological advancements are inevitable and will bring significant changes to our lives, potentially leading to a future where humans can focus on more fulfilling activities. However, the uncertainty and potential job losses caused by these changes can be challenging for individuals to cope with. To mitigate these issues, it's essential to adapt and invent equitable systems that minimize uncertainty and provide opportunities for people to thrive in the new technological landscape. The future may be uncertain, but by focusing on the present and working together, we can create a more optimistic scenario for humanity. The ultimate goal should be to use technology to enhance human capabilities and create a world where everyone can live fulfilling lives.

    • Approaching interactions with wisdom and optimismMisunderstandings and mistakes are natural, learn from them and assume positive intentions for productive dialogue.

      Even when we make mistakes or say something unintentionally, it's important to approach the situation with a wise and optimistic perspective. We all make errors, and it's natural to feel silly or regretful when we do. However, instead of dwelling on the mistake, we can choose to learn from it and move forward. Moreover, in our conversations and interactions, it's crucial to remember that our words may not always come across as intended. Misunderstandings can occur, and it's essential to give each other the benefit of the doubt and assume positive intentions. This approach can help prevent unnecessary conflict and foster a more positive and productive dialogue. Furthermore, it's essential to remember that exploration and experimentation are a natural part of the learning process. We shouldn't be afraid to put ourselves out there and share our ideas, even if they're tentative or incomplete. By doing so, we can stimulate new ideas and perspectives and contribute to a more dynamic and creative conversation. In conclusion, the key takeaway is to approach our interactions with a wise and optimistic perspective. We should remember that misunderstandings and mistakes are a natural part of the learning process, and we can choose to learn from them rather than letting them hold us back. By assuming positive intentions and approaching conversations with an open and curious mind, we can foster a more productive and positive dialogue.

    Recent Episodes from Sean Carroll's Mindscape: Science, Society, Philosophy, Culture, Arts, and Ideas

    276 | Gavin Schmidt on Measuring, Predicting, and Protecting Our Climate

    276 | Gavin Schmidt on Measuring, Predicting, and Protecting Our Climate

    The Earth's climate keeps changing, largely due to the effects of human activity, and we haven't been doing enough to slow things down. Indeed, over the past year, global temperatures have been higher than ever, and higher than most climate models have predicted. Many of you have probably seen plots like this. Today's guest, Gavin Schmidt, has been a leader in measuring the variations in Earth's climate, modeling its likely future trajectory, and working to get the word out. We talk about the current state of the art, and what to expect for the future.

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/20/276-gavin-schmidt-on-measuring-predicting-and-protecting-our-climate/

    Gavin Schmidt received his Ph.D. in applied mathematics from University College London. He is currently Director of NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, and an affiliate of the Center for Climate Systems Research at Columbia University. His research involves both measuring and modeling climate variability. Among his awards are the inaugural Climate Communications Prize of the American Geophysical Union. He is a cofounder of the RealClimate blog.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    275 | Solo: Quantum Fields, Particles, Forces, and Symmetries

    275 | Solo: Quantum Fields, Particles, Forces, and Symmetries

    Publication week! Say hello to Quanta and Fields, the second volume of the planned three-volume series The Biggest Ideas in the Universe. This volume covers quantum physics generally, but focuses especially on the wonders of quantum field theory. To celebrate, this solo podcast talks about some of the big ideas that make QFT so compelling: how quantized fields produce particles, how gauge symmetries lead to forces of nature, and how those forces can manifest in different phases, including Higgs and confinement.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/13/275-solo-quantum-fields-particles-forces-and-symmetries/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | May 2024

    AMA | May 2024

    Welcome to the May 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/05/06/ama-may-2024/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Here is the memorial to Dan Dennett at Ars Technica.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    274 | Gizem Gumuskaya on Building Robots from Human Cells

    274 | Gizem Gumuskaya on Building Robots from Human Cells

    Modern biology is advancing by leaps and bounds, not only in understanding how organisms work, but in learning how to modify them in interesting ways. One exciting frontier is the study of tiny "robots" created from living molecules and cells, rather than metal and plastic. Gizem Gumuskaya, who works with previous guest Michael Levin, has created anthrobots, a new kind of structure made from living human cells. We talk about how that works, what they can do, and what future developments might bring.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/29/274-gizem-gumuskaya-on-building-robots-from-human-cells/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Gimez Gumuskaya received her Ph.D. from Tufts University and the Harvard Wyss Institute for Biologically-Inspired Engineering. She is currently a postdoctoral researcher at Tufts University. She previously received a dual master's degree in Architecture and Synthetic Biology from MIT.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    273 | Stefanos Geroulanos on the Invention of Prehistory

    273 | Stefanos Geroulanos on the Invention of Prehistory

    Humanity itself might be the hardest thing for scientists to study fairly and accurately. Not only do we come to the subject with certain inevitable preconceptions, but it's hard to resist the temptation to find scientific justifications for the stories we'd like to tell about ourselves. In his new book, The Invention of Prehistory, Stefanos Geroulanos looks at the ways that we have used -- and continue to use -- supposedly-scientific tales of prehistoric humanity to bolster whatever cultural, social, and political purposes we have at the moment.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/22/273-stefanos-geroulanos-on-the-invention-of-prehistory/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Stefanos Geroulanos received his Ph.D. in humanities from Johns Hopkins. He is currently director of the Remarque Institute and a professor of history at New York University. He is the author and editor of a number of books on European intellectual history. He serves as a Co-Executive Editor of the Journal of the History of Ideas.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    272 | Leslie Valiant on Learning and Educability in Computers and People

    272 | Leslie Valiant on Learning and Educability in Computers and People

    Science is enabled by the fact that the natural world exhibits predictability and regularity, at least to some extent. Scientists collect data about what happens in the world, then try to suggest "laws" that capture many phenomena in simple rules. A small irony is that, while we are looking for nice compact rules, there aren't really nice compact rules about how to go about doing that. Today's guest, Leslie Valiant, has been a pioneer in understanding how computers can and do learn things about the world. And in his new book, The Importance of Being Educable, he pinpoints this ability to learn new things as the crucial feature that distinguishes us as human beings. We talk about where that capability came from and what its role is as artificial intelligence becomes ever more prevalent.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/15/272-leslie-valiant-on-learning-and-educability-in-computers-and-people/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Leslie Valiant received his Ph.D. in computer science from Warwick University. He is currently the T. Jefferson Coolidge Professor of Computer Science and Applied Mathematics at Harvard University. He has been awarded a Guggenheim Fellowship, the Knuth Prize, and the Turing Award, and he is a member of the National Academy of Sciences as well as a Fellow of the Royal Society and the American Association for the Advancement of Science. He is the pioneer of "Probably Approximately Correct" learning, which he wrote about in a book of the same name.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | April 2024

    AMA | April 2024

    Welcome to the April 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/08/ama-april-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    271 | Claudia de Rham on Modifying General Relativity

    271 | Claudia de Rham on Modifying General Relativity

    Einstein's theory of general relativity has been our best understanding of gravity for over a century, withstanding a variety of experimental challenges of ever-increasing precision. But we have to be open to the possibility that general relativity -- even at the classical level, aside from any questions of quantum gravity -- isn't the right theory of gravity. Such speculation is motivated by cosmology, where we have a good model of the universe but one with a number of loose ends. Claudia de Rham has been a leader in exploring how gravity could be modified in cosmologically interesting ways, and we discuss the current state of the art as well as future prospects.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/04/01/271-claudia-de-rham-on-modifying-general-relativity/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Claudia de Rham received her Ph.D. in physics from the University of Cambridge. She is currently a professor of physics and deputy department head at Imperial College, London. She is a Simons Foundation Investigator, winner of the Blavatnik Award, and a member of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences. Her new book is The Beauty of Falling: A Life in Pursuit of Gravity.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    270 | Solo: The Coming Transition in How Humanity Lives

    270 | Solo: The Coming Transition in How Humanity Lives

    Technology is changing the world, in good and bad ways. Artificial intelligence, internet connectivity, biological engineering, and climate change are dramatically altering the parameters of human life. What can we say about how this will extend into the future? Will the pace of change level off, or smoothly continue, or hit a singularity in a finite time? In this informal solo episode, I think through what I believe will be some of the major forces shaping how human life will change over the decades to come, exploring the very real possibility that we will experience a dramatic phase transition into a new kind of equilibrium.

    Blog post with transcript and links to additional resources: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/03/25/270-solo-the-coming-transition-in-how-humanity-lives/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    269 | Sahar Heydari Fard on Complexity, Justice, and Social Dynamics

    269 | Sahar Heydari Fard on Complexity, Justice, and Social Dynamics

    When it comes to social change, two questions immediately present themselves: What kind of change do we want to see happen? And, how do we bring it about? These questions are distinct but related; there's not much point in spending all of our time wanting change that won't possibly happen, or working for change that wouldn't actually be good. Addressing such issues lies at the intersection of philosophy, political science, and social dynamics. Sahar Heydari Fard looks at all of these issues through the lens of complex systems theory, to better understand how the world works and how it might be improved.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/03/18/269-sahar-heydari-fard-on-complexity-justice-and-social-dynamics/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Sahar Heydari Fard received a Masters in applied economics and a Ph.D. in philosophy from the University of Cincinnati. She is currently an assistant professor in philosophy at the Ohio State University. Her research lies at the intersection of social and behavioral sciences, social and political philosophy, and ethics, using tools from complex systems theory.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Related Episodes

    17 | Annalee Newitz on Science, Fiction, Economics, and Neurosis

    17 | Annalee Newitz on Science, Fiction, Economics, and Neurosis
    The job of science fiction isn't to predict the future; it's to tell interesting stories in an imaginative setting, exploring the implications of different ways the world could be different from our actual one. Annalee Newitz has carved out a unique career as a writer and thinker, founding the visionary blog io9 and publishing nonfiction in a number of formats, and is now putting her imagination to work in the realm of fiction. Her recent novel, Autonomous, examines a future in which the right to work is not automatic, rogue drug pirates synthesize compounds to undercut Big Pharma, and sentient robots discover their sexuality. We talk about how science fiction needs more economics, how much of human behavior comes down to dealing with our neuroses, and what it's like to make the transition from writing non-fiction to fiction. Annalee Newitz is currently an Editor at Large at Ars Technica. She received her Ph.D. in English and American Studies from UC Berkeley. She founded and edited io9, which later merged with Gizmodo, where she also served as editor. She and Charlie Jane Anders host the podcast Our Opinions Are Correct, a bi-weekly exploration of the meaning of science fiction. Home page Wikipedia page Amazon author page Articles at io9/Gizmodo Articles at Ars Technica Our Opinions Are Correct podcast See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Holiday Message: Reflections on Immortality

    Holiday Message: Reflections on Immortality

    The final Mindscape podcast of each year is devoted to a short, reflective Holiday Message. This year the theme is Immortality: whether it's an attractive idea, and whether the laws of physics and cosmology would allow for it in principle. (Spoiler: they do not.) Mindscape will return as usual on January 1, 2024. Happy holidays everyone!

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2023/12/18/holiday-message-2023-reflections-on-immortality/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    Here are some of the stories and papers mentioned in the episode:


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | March 2024

    AMA | March 2024

    Welcome to the March 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic.

    Big congrats this month to Ryan Funakoshi, winner of this year's Mindscape Big Picture Scholarship! And enormous, heartfelt thanks to everyone who contributed. We're going to keep doing this in years to come.

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/03/11/ama-march-2024/

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    AMA | February 2024

    AMA | February 2024

    Welcome to the February 2024 Ask Me Anything episode of Mindscape! These monthly excursions are funded by Patreon supporters (who are also the ones asking the questions). We take questions asked by Patreons, whittle them down to a more manageable number -- based primarily on whether I have anything interesting to say about them, not whether the questions themselves are good -- and sometimes group them together if they are about a similar topic. Enjoy!

    Blog post with questions and transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/02/12/ama-february-2024/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    265 | John Skrentny on How the Economy Mistreats STEM Workers

    265 | John Skrentny on How the Economy Mistreats STEM Workers

    Universities and their students are constantly being encouraged to produce more graduates majoring in STEM fields -- science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. That's the kind of training that will get you a rewarding job, students are told, while at the policy level it is emphasized how STEM workers are needed to drive innovation and growth. In his new book Wasted Education, sociologist John Skrentny points out that the post-graduation trajectories of STEM graduates are more likely to involve being chewed up and spit out by the tech economy than to end up with stable long-term careers. We talk about why that's the case and what might be done about it.

    Blog post with transcript: https://www.preposterousuniverse.com/podcast/2024/02/05/265-john-skrentny-on-how-the-economy-mistreats-stem-workers/

    Support Mindscape on Patreon.

    John Skrentny received his Ph.D. in sociology from Harvard University. He is currently Professor of Sociology at UC San Diego, and has previously served as the Co-Director of the Center for Comparative Immigration Studies and Director of the Yankelovich Center for Social Science Research.


    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.