Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Running a Magazine: Balancing Tradition and InnovationAdvanced tech faces naming challenges, passionate leaders matter, delivering accurate info evolves, technology opens new conversations, constant drive to innovate and inform.

      Technology, though advanced, can still struggle with long, confusing names that don't resonate with consumers. Additionally, the importance of passionate and driven leaders in companies cannot be overstated. The conversation between Joe Rogan and Jacob Ward touched upon the challenges of running a magazine like Popular Science, which has a rich history but also faced controversy in the past. The responsibility of delivering accurate and impactful information has evolved significantly over the years, and the access to technology has opened up new opportunities for conversations like this one. Despite the complexities and challenges, the drive to innovate and inform remains a constant.

    • From Exclusivity to Accessibility: The Evolution of MediaThe media industry has shifted from a few controlling voices to a platform for anyone to reach a vast audience. Technology advances push for transparency and accountability, making ethical conduct crucial.

      The media landscape has undergone a significant transformation from the era of control and exclusivity to an age of accessibility and transparency. Back in the day, getting on the air required immense effort, and those who made it to the top were often ruthless and wealthy. The public's perception was shaped almost entirely by a select few. However, the values of meritocracy and hard work that defined the post-war generation have carried over to the media industry. Now, anyone can be on the air or reach a vast audience through digital platforms. Moreover, advanced technology, such as IARPA's research into identifying visual information from photographs and videos, is pushing the boundaries of data collection and analysis, making it increasingly difficult to hide the truth. This new era calls for greater accountability and ethical conduct, as the reach and impact of media have grown exponentially.

    • Privacy and Personal Data: Balancing Convenience and Individual RightsMaintaining individual privacy rights is crucial in the era of advanced technology, while ensuring convenience and accountability.

      While technology offers conveniences like image recognition and search capabilities, there are concerns about privacy and the potential misuse of personal information. The discussion highlights the unease with the idea of unknown individuals having access to personal data, and the importance of maintaining individual privacy rights. The conversation also touches upon the need for trust and accountability in those who have access to such information. The speaker expresses a belief in the importance of order and discipline, but not at the cost of individual freedom and autonomy. The current political climate, with its increased surveillance and decreased due process, further emphasizes the importance of these issues.

    • The Internet and Technology: Opportunities and Challenges for Democracy and Access to InformationThe internet and technology provide new avenues for democracy, activism, and access to information, but also necessitate ethical rules and regulations to prevent harm and ensure privacy.

      The internet and technology have created new opportunities for democracy, activism, and access to information, but also require rules and regulations to ensure ethical behavior and prevent harm. The anonymity of the internet can lead to positive outcomes, such as citizen activism and exposing wrongdoing, but also poses risks, such as cyberbullying and privacy invasions. The democratization of information and creation of platforms like Twitter have transformed how we communicate and access news, but also require us to navigate the challenges of information overload and misinformation. Ultimately, the internet and technology offer incredible benefits, but also require thoughtful consideration and regulation to harness their full potential for good.

    • Exploring the complexities of the brain with Popular SciencePopular Science continues to engage audiences with accessible insights into brain research, including the study of fear and its impact on human behavior.

      Popular Science magazine, with its universally beloved brand and loyal following across various mediums, continues to thrive despite the decline of paper-based subscriptions. The magazine covers a wide range of scientific topics, including the brain, and despite our limited understanding of the complexities of the brain, we're already making significant strides in treating diseases and understanding its functions. Fear, a fundamental aspect of personality, is just one of the many subtleties of the brain that we're only beginning to explore. The ability to handle fear effectively varies greatly from person to person, and understanding these differences can provide valuable insights into the workings of the brain and human behavior. Ultimately, Popular Science's commitment to exploring the unknown and making complex scientific concepts accessible to a wide audience keeps it a vital and engaging source of knowledge.

    • Exploring the Complexities of the Human MindThe human mind is complex, capable of amazing feats, and still a work in progress to fully understand and replicate.

      Our physical and mental abilities are distinct and shaped by both genetics and constant focus. The brain, in particular, is distinct and capable of amazing feats, such as triggering memories and even potentially being manipulated to improve memory or restore abilities lost due to conditions like dementia. However, the complexity of the human mind means that fully understanding and replicating these abilities is still a work in progress. The ongoing advancements in fields like biomechanical engineering offer promising possibilities for the future, but also highlight the vast amount we still have to learn about the human mind.

    • Leveraging Data for Growth: Overcoming Distractions in the Digital EraThe abundance of data in the digital age brings growth opportunities but also challenges in managing attention. Tools like Write Room help limit distractions, and being mindful and intentional in using information is essential.

      Data and access to information are crucial for growth and intelligence, whether it's for artificial brains or human beings. The more data we have, the better our performance, as shown by the example of Google's math officer's findings. However, with the abundance of data comes the challenge of managing attention and distractions. Tools like Write Room can help limit distractions and keep focus on the task at hand. Additionally, the ease of access to information has made it harder to be ignorant, but also harder to pay attention to everything. Ultimately, the roaring 20s of the digital era offer us an incredible wealth of information, but it requires us to be mindful and intentional in how we use it.

    • Opportunities and Challenges of the Digital Age for Comedians and Mental HealthThe digital age provides unexpected opportunities for self-promotion and self-publishing, but it also brings complex issues related to mental health and medication effects.

      The digital age has opened up opportunities for self-promotion and self-publishing, leading to unexpected success stories for individuals like comedians, who can now reach large audiences through platforms like YouTube. However, it's important to note that while this era has its benefits, it also comes with complex issues, such as the impact of antidepressants on the human mind. The effects of antidepressants can vary greatly from person to person, and research is still in its early stages in understanding how these drugs affect the brain. The use of antipsychotics, a different class of psychiatric medication, can have transformative effects for some individuals, but it's crucial to consider the individual's unique experiences and circumstances before making judgments. Overall, the digital age offers unique opportunities and challenges, and it's essential to approach these topics with a nuanced understanding.

    • The complexities of mental health treatment and substance interactionsThe effectiveness and side effects of mind-affecting medications can vary greatly, emphasizing the importance of individualized approaches to mental health treatment and continued research into brain-substance interactions.

      The effectiveness and side effects of medications that affect the mind can vary greatly from person to person, making it a complex and unpredictable process. This is due to the intricacies of the blood-brain barrier and the vast array of genetic and cultural influences on how substances interact with the brain. For instance, alcohol, which has a long and complex history in human culture, can have vastly different impacts on individuals based on their genetic background and cultural history with the substance. This unpredictability highlights the importance of individualized approaches to mental health treatment and the need for continued research into the complexities of the brain and its interactions with various substances.

    • Individual Responses to Substances: Unraveling the MysteriesPeople react differently to substances like alcohol, and research explores tech solutions to prevent seizures and addiction, focusing on brain signals and reward mechanisms.

      There are significant differences in how individuals respond to substances like alcohol, and the mechanisms behind these differences are not yet fully understood. Some people can handle large amounts without blacking out, while others may only need a small amount before becoming completely intoxicated or addicted. Research is being conducted into developing technology that can help prevent seizures and potentially even curb addictive impulses by detecting and responding to specific signals in the brain. The reward mechanism in our brains plays a role in all types of addictions, including substance abuse and technology use.

    • Brains' Adaptability: From Addictions to New SkillsExposure to addictive substances or behaviors can physically alter the brain, leading to compulsive behaviors. Brains also have the ability to compensate for damage and adapt to new situations.

      Our brains are incredibly adaptable and can form compulsive behaviors, such as addiction to gambling or acquiring new skills after brain damage. The discussion highlights how exposure to addictive things can physically rewire the brain to seek rewards, and how this can lead to damaging consequences in some cases. The story of Derek Amato, a savant who gained a newfound skill after a brain injury, illustrates the brain's ability to compensate for damage and adapt to new situations. While the causes of these phenomena are not yet fully understood, it's clear that our brains are constantly changing to help us survive and thrive in the world around us.

    • Late-life artistic abilities from brain injuries or aging: Savant SyndromeBrain injuries or aging can lead to extraordinary artistic abilities (Savant Syndrome) despite cognitive impairments, possibly due to 'disinhibition' of certain brain areas.

      Brain injuries and aging can lead to the emergence of extraordinary artistic abilities, a phenomenon known as Savant Syndrome. This condition, which is often accompanied by developmental disabilities or other cognitive impairments, challenges our understanding of the brain and its capabilities. While the exact cause of these abilities is not fully understood, some theories suggest that damage to certain areas of the brain may result in the "disinhibition" of other areas, allowing for heightened creativity and focus on detail. Savant Syndrome is not common in people with autism, but there are notable cases of individuals with autism displaying remarkable talents. The idea that the human mind is constantly evolving and advancing, leading to the acquisition of extraordinary abilities, is intriguing but not yet supported by scientific research. The discovery of late-in-life artistic abilities in some individuals adds a fascinating dimension to our understanding of the brain and creativity.

    • The human mind's ability to create art despite mental illness and the fascination with our distant relatives, the NeanderthalsArt offers insight into the human mind, even during mental illness. Neanderthals, our distant relatives, had larger brains and different capabilities compared to modern humans, despite sharing ancestry.

      The human mind is a complex and mysterious thing, capable of creating art that offers a window into the depths of one's thoughts, even when those thoughts are distorted by mental illness. The artist in question, with his obsession and intricate mythology, provides an example of this. Furthermore, the human race has come a long way from our primitive ancestors, with advancements in technology and intelligence that far surpass what our early ancestors could have imagined. The existence of Neanderthals, our distant relatives, adds to the fascination, as they had larger brains and different capabilities compared to modern humans. Despite our shared ancestry, they were vastly different beings, with physical strength far beyond what we possess today. The ongoing research into Neanderthal genetics and potential interbreeding adds another layer to this intriguing story.

    • Exploring the Ethical Implications of Scientific AdvancementsScientific advancements, such as de-extinction, offer potential benefits but require ethical considerations and careful regulation to mitigate risks and unintended consequences.

      While the potential benefits of scientific advancements, such as de-extinction, are intriguing, there are also significant ethical concerns and unknown implications that must be carefully considered. The excitement and curiosity of scientists and the public to explore new frontiers can sometimes lead to unintended consequences, as demonstrated by the development of the atomic bomb. It's crucial to approach such advancements with caution and regulation, considering the potential risks and long-term effects on society and the environment. The creation of a Neanderthal, for instance, raises ethical questions about the morality of bringing extinct species back to life and the potential consequences of introducing them into modern society. It's essential to have scientific consensus and government regulation to ensure that these advancements are used responsibly and ethically.

    • Understanding the Invisible Consequences of War and Military TechnologyRecognizing the long-term effects of concussive blasts on soldiers' brains and the rapid advancement of military technology is crucial for supporting soldiers' wellbeing and shaping future military strategies.

      The effects of war and military technology on soldiers' health, particularly traumatic brain injuries caused by concussive blasts, have become better understood but also more prevalent. Soldiers who appear unharmed after an explosion can still suffer invisible damage to the brain, leading to long-term consequences. This was exemplified by footage of soldiers running towards explosions, unaware of the danger. The military's rapid advancement of technology, fueled by vast resources and unlimited budgets, has led to the development of advanced weapons and aircraft, including stealth fighters, within a short timeframe. The consequences of these advancements, both visible and invisible, continue to shape the landscape of warfare and its impact on soldiers' lives. [END] This is a simple and meaningful summary of the discussion. It highlights the importance of recognizing the long-term effects of concussive blasts on soldiers' brains and the rapid advancement of military technology. The takeaway emphasizes the significance of understanding these issues and their impact on soldiers' lives.

    • Discoveries and Innovations through Radar and Brain ResearchInvesting in research and technology, like radar and brain projects, can lead to significant discoveries and potential economic benefits, such as stealth technology and a better understanding of the mind.

      Advancements in technology, such as radar and brain research, can lead to significant discoveries and innovations. Radar, while not perfect, plays a crucial role in detecting objects and avoiding collisions. However, there's ongoing research to create stealth technology that can make objects undetectable by radar. Similarly, the human brain is a mystery that scientists are trying to unravel through projects like the $3 billion federally funded brain map project. This research could lead to a better understanding of the mind and potential economic benefits. The human brain's development is still a mystery, with some theories suggesting that the consumption of meat played a role in its growth. Overall, these advancements demonstrate the importance of investing in research and technology to expand our knowledge and capabilities. (Word count: 137)

    • Pondering the Inefficiencies of Human Reproduction and Urban LivingWe must consider the long-term implications of our actions and recognize the interconnectedness of human reproduction, urban living, and the natural world. Cities, like New York, may lack self-sustainability and rely on complex systems, but they are subject to the eventual dominance of nature.

      The human body and our urban living conditions present unique challenges, with our vulnerable newborns being born defenseless and our cities relying on complex systems for survival. The speaker mused about the absurdity of the human reproductive system and the inefficiency of cities like New York, which lack self-sustainability and rely heavily on transportation. They also highlighted the fleeting nature of human-made structures and the eventual dominance of nature over time. The discussion emphasized the importance of considering the long-term implications of our actions and the interconnectedness of various systems in our world.

    • Adapting to the Unpredictable WorldPrepare for the unexpected by building resilient structures and embracing remote work, but remember the importance of face-to-face interactions for trust and connection. Be open to innovation and growth in the face of uncertainty.

      As the world changes, we must adapt to new realities. Whether it's building structures that can withstand extreme weather events or communicating with colleagues in a remote setting, we need to be prepared for the unexpected. The interviewee shared stories of designing structures to withstand 60-year storms, only to have them destroyed by 100-year storms. Similarly, the ability to work remotely has become increasingly important, but it's not a substitute for face-to-face interactions for building trust and deep connections. The unpredictability of the world can be unsettling, but it also presents opportunities for innovation and growth. We must be willing to adapt and evolve, even when it's challenging. The future is uncertain, but with the right mindset and tools, we can navigate it successfully.

    • The uncanny valley and human-like robotsRoboticists aim to create human-like robots that can fool or comfort humans, but the uncanny valley makes this challenging. Remote viewing, the ability to describe distant events, remains a controversial topic.

      The closer a robot comes to looking and behaving like a human, the more uncomfortable and even creepy people find it. This phenomenon, known as the uncanny valley, is a focus of roboticists who aim to create robots that can fool humans or make them feel comfortable. Meanwhile, the debate around remote viewing, the alleged ability to describe and depict things from a distance without physical presence, remains controversial. Some claim it's been proven statistically, while others consider it unlikely. The human memory and perception, including the ability to know where things are happening, are still subjects of ongoing research. We don't fully understand how memories are stored or retrieved, and the boundary between what's real and what's imagined continues to be explored.

    • The Complexities of Human MemoryMemories aren't exactly stored in neurons as we once believed, they can fade over time like an old VHS tape, and the process of learning and remembering is still a mystery.

      Memories may not be stored as we once thought in the neurons, but rather as copies that can become less clear over time. This theory is based on the fact that human cells, except for neurons, regenerate every seven years. The implication of this is that older memories can become fuzzy and less defined, much like an old VHS tape. Additionally, the way we learn and remember is not well understood, as shown in the use of anesthesia to turn off long-term memory during certain medical procedures. The discussion also touched upon the historical practices of lobotomies and shock treatment, which have since been replaced with more advanced and less invasive methods for treating mental health conditions. Overall, the conversation highlighted the complexities and mysteries surrounding the human memory and brain function.

    • Exploring Calming Methods: From Electroshock Therapy to AIAdvancements in mental health treatment through methods like electroshock therapy and medication have evolved, with criticisms leading to the development of more interconnected human-machine relationships, envisioning a future of innovation in healthcare and technology.

      The exploration of calming effects on the body and mind through various methods, such as electroshock therapy and medication, has led to significant advancements in understanding and treating mental health conditions. However, the past approaches, like electroshock therapy, were criticized for their potential negative side effects and lack of addressing negative symptoms. Now, with the advent of technology, we are seeing a blurring of lines between humans and machines, with devices offering suggestions and information before we ask for them, making us feel almost symbiotic. This trend, as proposed by Ray Kurzweil, envisions a future where humans and machines will be even more interconnected, potentially leading to a new era of innovation and development. Despite the criticisms and concerns, these advancements reflect our ongoing quest for knowledge and improvement in healthcare and technology.

    • Disconnecting from Modern World for Profound Mental BenefitsDisconnecting from modern world through practices like digital detox or sensory deprivation can lead to increased clarity, enhanced problem-solving abilities, deeper consciousness connection, and new perspectives. Sensory deprivation tanks offer a unique, controlled environment for this experience, but they're not widely available.

      Disconnecting from the constant input of the modern world, such as through a digital detox or sensory deprivation, can have profound effects on the mind. These experiences can lead to increased clarity, enhanced problem-solving abilities, and a deeper connection to one's consciousness. The absence of sensory input can also magnify the brain's capabilities, allowing for new perspectives and insights. While some may find this through practices like meditation or psychedelic substances, sensory deprivation tanks offer a unique and controlled environment for this experience. Despite their benefits, these tanks are not widely available, leaving many to miss out on this potentially transformative experience.

    • Exploring Unique Experiences with Sensory Deprivation Tanks and SubstancesSensory deprivation tanks offer intense experiences when used with certain substances, but require practice and relaxation for full benefits. Some report communication with animals and powerful experiences, while availability is limited due to difficulty achieving relaxation and concentration.

      Sensory deprivation tanks, such as the one described in the discussion, can provide a unique and intense experience that can be enhanced when used in conjunction with certain substances. However, achieving the full benefits requires practice and the ability to let go and relax completely. While some people may not find it effective, others have reported powerful experiences, including communication with animals like dolphins. The pioneer of this practice, John Lilly, was known for his exploration of interspecies communication and his use of both isolation tanks and psychedelic substances. Despite its potential benefits, sensory deprivation tanks are not widely available, likely due to the difficulty of achieving the necessary relaxation and concentration, as well as the stigma surrounding their association with psychedelic use.

    • Passionate Speech Against Dolphin CaptivityDolphins' high intelligence and freedom matter, wild experiences reveal advanced abilities, captivity causes aggression and unhappiness, comparing unhappy dolphins to human prisoners, opposition to taking babies from mothers, admiration for shark researchers but unique qualities of dolphins.

      The speaker passionately opposes dolphin captivity due to their high intelligence and the lack of freedom they experience in confined environments. She also mentions her own psychedelic experience with wild dolphins, which reinforced her belief in their advanced abilities and communicative nature. The speaker argues against the notion that unhappy dolphins would commit suicide, using a comparison to humans in prison. She also criticizes the taking of dolphins from their mothers and the increase in aggressive behavior exhibited by dolphins in captivity. The speaker admires the work of scientists who study sharks and the dangers they face, but values the unique qualities and abilities of dolphins, which include their intelligence, communication skills, and lack of interest in human-made fishing hooks.

    • The harm of keeping intelligent animals in captivityKeeping intelligent animals in captivity harms their mental and physical health, and we should create more natural environments for them to interact and learn.

      The speaker believes that keeping intelligent animals in captivity, such as in zoos or marine parks, is an outdated practice and can be detrimental to their mental and physical well-being. He uses the example of killer whales swimming in circles in large tanks as an illustration of this issue. He suggests that if we truly want to interact with and learn from these animals, we should create more natural environments for them, such as providing food and observing them in their habitats through submarines. The speaker also touches upon the historical context of zoos and the ethics of justifying the imprisonment of intelligent beings. He encourages us to consider how we would react if an intelligent species from another planet encountered our human society and its practices.

    • Understanding Animal Instincts and Ethical ConsiderationsAnimals have instinctual drives that can be harmful if not met, like chasing prey for predators. Intelligent marine animals face ethical dilemmas in captivity, while big cats and other predators may pose danger to humans. Respecting animal instincts and ethical considerations is crucial.

      Animals, especially predators, have an instinctual drive to chase and catch their prey, which is a fundamental part of their survival and evolution. However, keeping them in cages without the ability to fulfill this drive can be detrimental to their wellbeing. The discussion also touched upon the intelligence of certain marine animals, such as beluga whales and stingrays, and the ethical dilemma of keeping them in captivity for human entertainment. The speaker expressed awe for the domesticated behavior of stingrays and the experience of swimming with them, but also acknowledged the moral concerns and the need to draw a line when dealing with intelligent beings. Additionally, the conversation highlighted the behavior of big cats, such as lions and tigers, and how they are often kept in cages for human entertainment, sometimes leading to inhumane treatment. The speaker shared anecdotes of lions and tigers tearing apart goats or other animals, and the instinctual response of these predators to chase and catch their prey. The speaker also touched upon the instincts of mountain lions and coyotes, and the potential danger they pose to small children. The importance of picking up children and avoiding direct confrontation with these animals was emphasized. Overall, the conversation underscored the importance of understanding and respecting the natural instincts and behaviors of animals, and the ethical considerations surrounding their treatment and captivity.

    • Dolphins' Intelligence and Complex Social StructuresDolphins challenge human understanding of intelligence and consciousness with their advanced cognitive abilities and emotional lives, while humans grapple with the implications of transcending death through technology.

      Dolphins are incredibly intelligent beings with advanced cognitive abilities and complex social structures. The speaker shared his personal experience of training dolphins and being deeply moved by their intelligence, which challenged his perspective on human consciousness and consciousness in general. Dolphins have a larger cerebral cortex than humans, and their ability to manipulate their environment through communication and movement is unique. The speaker also highlighted the emotional lives of animals like elephants and the evolution of human consciousness. The speaker was fascinated by the idea of transcending death through technology but wondered about the implications of such a choice. The human instinct to survive and the ego's desire for importance are in constant tension with the reality of being a finite being and a part of a larger process. People's ability to voluntarily enter dangerous situations despite their instincts to survive is a testament to human bravery and resilience.

    • Overcoming Instinctual Fears and Buying Time in High-Pressure SituationsHuman resilience allows us to think critically and make calculated decisions under pressure, buying time to assess situations and increase chances of success.

      The human ability to overcome instinctual fears and resist panic in high-pressure situations is a remarkable aspect of our evolution and development. Whether it's athletes pushing the limits of what's possible in extreme sports or test pilots dealing with malfunctioning equipment, individuals have been trained to think critically and make calculated decisions under duress. The ability to "wind the clock" and buy time to assess the situation is a valuable skill that can mean the difference between success and failure. This mental fortitude is not only seen in extreme scenarios but also in everyday life, where the capacity to stay calm and rational in the face of adversity is essential. The stories of astronauts, test pilots, and X Games athletes demonstrate the power of human resilience and the importance of training and situational awareness.

    • Duty, Human Limits, and Heroism: Balancing Human Resilience and Technological InnovationHuman training and mindset are crucial in dangerous tasks, while technology advances aim to replace humans, highlighting the importance of both human resilience and technological innovation.

      Training and mindset play crucial roles in performing dangerous tasks and pushing human limits. The discussion revolves around a person who resists the urge to take a photo in a dangerous situation due to his duty and training. This ties into the human fascination with heroes and the evolutionary process of testing the limits of the human body. The conversation also touches on the development of advanced technology, such as rescue robots, which aim to replace humans in dangerous situations. The challenges posed to robot creators show the incredible advancements being made, but also the potential for frightening outcomes. Overall, the conversation highlights the importance of both human resilience and technological innovation.

    • Fear and Disgust: Complex Reactions to StimuliOur reactions to robots, animals, sounds, and other stimuli can be shaped by biology, culture, and personal experiences, with some people becoming desensitized through repeated exposure. Epigenetics plays a role in how our experiences and environment impact our genetic makeup and reactions.

      Our natural instincts and reactions to certain things, such as the appearance and behavior of robots or animals, can evoke fear and disgust. For example, robots with militaristic designs or spiders with unusual features can be perceived as scary or threatening. Similarly, sounds like vomiting or the idea of two men having sex can elicit a strong negative response due to our evolutionary past and cultural conditioning. However, some people may become desensitized to these stimuli through repeated exposure. The discussion also touched upon the concept of epigenetics and how our experiences and environment can impact our genetic makeup and reactions to various stimuli. Ultimately, our fears and reactions are complex and multifaceted, shaped by a combination of biological, cultural, and personal factors.

    • The Survival Instinct Behind Our Aversion to Foul SmellsOur aversion to certain smells, like decay or vomit, helps us avoid health hazards and predators. Bad breath can signal illness and keep us from others. Sensory deprivation promotes relaxation and mental clarity.

      Our aversion to certain smells, such as the smell of decay or vomit, may have evolved as a survival mechanism to help us avoid potential health hazards and predators. This aversion is not just limited to human bodies but also extends to other sources of foul smells. For instance, the fear of dysentery and the desire to stay away from dirty parts of people are also driven by the same instinct. Additionally, bad breath, which can be a symptom of illness, may also be a reason to keep a distance from someone. The conversation also touched upon the potential benefits of sensory deprivation, such as isolation tanks, in promoting relaxation and mental clarity. Despite skepticism towards such practices, many people report positive experiences and benefits from using them. Overall, the discussion highlighted the fascinating ways in which our senses and instincts have evolved to help us navigate the world and survive.

    • Encounter with a Military Bouncer and the Complexities of Living Near Mission BayThe military community enforces strict rules, leaving some feeling intimidated, while the natural beauty of Mission Bay is desirable, but online identity theft is a frustrating challenge.

      The military community enforces strict rules and regulations, especially when it comes to public spaces like bars. An encounter with a military bouncer left the speaker feeling intimidated and confused, as she was mistakenly accused of smoking pot. Despite the challenges, the speaker expressed a desire to live near Mission Bay due to its natural beauty and unique wildlife. However, the speaker also expressed frustration with the online world, as there are people pretending to be him on social media platforms like Twitter. He lamented the lack of a verified account and the confusion it caused for his followers. Overall, the discussion touched on themes of military culture, the natural world, and the challenges of online identity.

    • Discounts and Upcoming Events on Squarespace and ONNITListeners can save 10% on a new website with code 'Joe3' on Squarespace and on supplements with code 'Rogan' on ONNIT. Don't miss Tom Segura's event in Nashville, tickets are running low.

      There are current promotions available for creating a new website on Squarespace using the code "Joe3" for a 10% discount, and for purchasing supplements on ONNIT using the code name "Rogan" also for a 10% discount. Additionally, the podcast hosts mentioned upcoming events and guests, including Tom Segura in Nashville and Ben Hoffman from Comedy Central's new show. The podcast also mentioned that tickets for the Nashville event with Tom Segura are going fast and running low. Overall, the podcast provided information on discounts, upcoming events, and guests, encouraging listeners to take advantage of the offers and join them at their events.

    Recent Episodes from The Joe Rogan Experience

    #2173 - Jimmy Dore

    #2173 - Jimmy Dore
    Jimmy Dore is a stand-up comic, political commentator, and host of "The Jimmy Dore Show" on YouTube. Watch his new special, "Covid Lies Are Funny," at jimmydore.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2172 - Sebastian Junger

    #2172 - Sebastian Junger
    Sebastian Junger is a bestselling author, journalist, and an Academy Award-nominated documentary filmmaker. His latest book, "In My Time of Dying", is available now. www.sebastianjunger.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2171 - Eric Weinstein & Terrence Howard

    #2171 - Eric Weinstein & Terrence Howard
    Eric Weinstein holds a PhD in mathematical physics from Harvard University and is a member of the Galileo Project research team.  www.ericweinstein.org www.geometricunity.org Terrence Howard is an actor of stage and screen, musician, and researcher in the fields of logic and engineering. www.terryslynchpins.com www.tcotlc.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2170 - Max Lugavere

    #2170 - Max Lugavere
    Max Lugavere is a filmmaker, health and science journalist, author, and host of The Genius Life podcast. His debut film Little Empty Boxes is out now. http://littleemptyboxes.com www.maxlugavere.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2169 - Protect Our Parks 12

    #2169 - Protect Our Parks 12
    Shane Gillis, Mark Normand, and Ari Shaffir are stand-up comics, writers, and podcasters. Shane is the co-host of "Matt and Shane's Secret Podcast" with Matt McCusker and one half of the sketch comedy duo "Gilly and Keeves" with John McKeever. Watch his new comedy series, "Tires," and special, "Beautiful Dogs" on Netflix. www.shanemgillis.com Mark is the co-host of the podcasts "Tuesdays with Stories" with Joe List and "We Might Be Drunk" with Sam Morril. Watch his latest stand-up special, "Soup to Nuts," on Netflix. www.marknormandcomedy.com Ari is the host of the "You Be Trippin'" podcast. His latest comedy special, "Ari Shaffir: Jew," is available now via YouTube. www.arishaffir.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2168 - Tyler Fischer

    #2168 - Tyler Fischer
    Tyler Fischer is a stand-up comic, actor, and filmmaker. His latest special, "The Election Special | LIVE at Comedy Mothership," is available now via YouTube. https://youtu.be/FmvJjMGX7hw?si=PyOsFVH4as8HMHBD www.tylerfischer.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2167 - Noland Arbaugh

    #2167 - Noland Arbaugh
    Noland Arbaugh is the first human recipient of Neuralink’s brain-computer interface implant: an innovative new technology that allows him to control digital devices with his thoughts. Noland Arbaugh: https://x.com/ModdedQuad Neuralink www.neuralink.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2166 - Enhanced Games

    #2166 - Enhanced Games
    Christian Angermayer and Dr. Aron D’Souza are the co-founders of the Enhanced Games, an upcoming Olympic-style event that brings together the world’s top athletes to compete without arbitrary bans on performance-enhancing substances.  www.enhanced.org Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2165 - Jack Carr

    #2165 - Jack Carr
    Jack Carr is a bestselling author, retired Navy SEAL, and host of the “Danger Close” podcast. His newest book, "Red Sky Mourning,” is available now. www.officialjackcarr.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    The importance of values in regulating emerging technology to protect human rights with Ed Santow

    The importance of values in regulating emerging technology to protect human rights with Ed Santow

    In today’s episode no. 25, Edward Santow, Australia’s Human Rights Commissioner speaks to Reimagining Justice about one of many projects he is responsible for, namely the Commission’s Human Rights and Technology project.

    Whether you know a little or a lot about human rights or artificial intelligence, you will gain something from listening to our conversation about the most extensive consultation into AI and Human Rights anywhere in the world. Ed explains exactly what human rights are and why they should be protected, how technology is both enhancing and detracting from human rights and the best approach to take in regulating emerging technology in the future.

    We talked about protecting the rights of the most marginalized people, automated decision making and how to combat bias and something I found particularly fascinating, the tension between the universality of human rights, ubiquitous technology and how differing cultural contexts and historical experiences are shaping the principles that will guide both the development and application of technology.

    Ed Santow has been Human Rights Commissioner at the Australian Human Rights Commission since August 2016 and leads the Commission’s work on technology and human rights; refugees and migration; human rights issues affecting LGBTI people; counter-terrorism and national security; freedom of expression; freedom of religion; and implementing the Optional Protocol to the Convention Against Torture (OPCAT).

    Andrea Perry-Petersen – LinkedIn - Twitter @winkiepp – andreaperrypetersen.com.au

    Twitter - @ReimaginingJ

    Facebook – Reimagining Justice group

    Hair

    Hair
    Today the guys discuss all things hair (and the lack there of)! They warn of the dangers of hair removal, explore the strange hair trends of ancient Greek statues, and discuss sci-fi scenarios where the elite harvest hair and organs from the less fortunate. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Tina Seelig (Stanford Technology Ventures Program) - The Art of Teaching Entrepreneurship and Innovation

    Tina Seelig (Stanford Technology Ventures Program) - The Art of Teaching Entrepreneurship and Innovation
    Stanford Technology Ventures Program's Executive Director Tina Seelig shares rich insights in creative thinking and the entrepreneurial mindset. Her talk, based on her 2009 book, What I Wish I Knew When I Was 20, cites numerous classroom successes of applied problem-solving and the lessons of failure.

    How Albert Einstein's Brain Worked

    How Albert Einstein's Brain Worked

    Albert Einstein is one of the world's most recognizable geniuses. But was his brain any different from that of an average person? Check out this HowStuffWorks podcast to learn more about Thomas Harvey, the man who set out to decipher Einstein's brain.

    Learn more about your ad-choices at https://www.iheartpodcastnetwork.com

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    The rise of research entrepreneurs and why it matters

    The rise of research entrepreneurs and why it matters

    How can researchers who have developed innovative solutions begin to commercialize? What makes a great research-entrepreneur? And how are universities and organizations helping to bridge the research-to-commercialization gap? We will learn those answers and more in this episode with Laure Haak. A neuroscientist by training, Laure has a BS and MS in Biology and Ph.D. in Neuroscience from Stanford University, and she did postdoctoral work at the National Institutes of Health. Her career includes diverse experiences: serving as founding Executive Director of ORCID; leadership roles at Thomson Reuters, The US National Academies, and Science Magazine. She is currently founder and CEO of Mighty Red Barn, a consultancy that supports impact-based organizations building digital infrastructure, and helping research innovators go from discovery to startup. Laure carries on this work as a Research Scholar at the Ronin Institute, and Board Chair of Phoenix Bioinformatics and the Green Bay Chapter of SCORE.

    You can learn more about Laure and Mighty Red Barn here: https://www.mightyredbarn.com

    Learn more about Oracle for Research: http://www.oracle.com/research 

     

    ---------------------------------------------------------

    Episode Transcript

    00;00;00;00 - 00;00;26;12

    How can researchers who have developed innovative products begin to commercialize them? Why are digital persistent identifiers important to researchers? And who are some of the partners that can help researchers get their products to market? We'll get those answers and more on this episode of Research and Action. Hello again. Welcome back to Research in Action, brought to you by Oracle for Research.

     

    00;00;26;12 - 00;00;47;27

    I'm Mike Stiles. And our guest today is Laure Haak. Laure is a neuroscientist by training. She has a B.S. and M.S. in Biology and a Ph.D. in neuroscience from Stanford. And she did her postdoctoral work at the National Institutes of Health. She's done a lot over the course of her career, including serving as founding executive director of ORCID leadership roles at Thomson Reuters,

     

    00;00;48;00 - 00;01;14;09

    the U.S. National Academies, and Science magazine. She's currently founder and CEO of Mighty Red Barn. That's a consultancy that supports impact-based organizations that are trying to build their digital infrastructure. And it also helps research innovators like many of our listeners, get from discovery to startup. Laure carries on this work as a research scholar at the Ronin Institute and Board chair of Phoenix Bioinformatics and the Green Bay chapter of SCORE.

     

    00;01;14;09 - 00;01;38;01

    Laure you're obviously a very busy person, so I'm really glad you're on the show. Well, thank you for the invitation. I'm really looking forward to this conversation. Us as well. So we're going to talk about innovation to commercialization, because we do have listeners who are researchers and PhDs. They've got the research discovery part down. But starting and leading a startup, that's a whole different thing.

     

    00;01;38;02 - 00;02;02;28

    But before we do that, what did you want to be when you grew up and what motivated you at each step from Stanford, to ORCID, to Mighty Red Barn? Yeah. And so, I think whenever people ask about careers, it kind of depends on what you had for breakfast, how you answer the question. So, I think the best way to explain my career is that I never grew out of the childhood fascination with how things work.

     

    00;02;02;28 - 00;02;24;19

    I never stopped asking why, which has it's endearing and annoying qualities, depending again on what you had for breakfast. I was and still am fascinated with how the brain works. And after college I started graduate school in neuroscience during what was then the decade of the brain. It was a big deal. So I studied hibernation. I studied sleep wake cycles.

     

    00;02;24;19 - 00;02;51;12

    I studied how our bodies internal clock responds to light. I was also at the same time involved in the Association for Women in Science as well as Women in Neuroscience, where I managed a quarterly or a quarterly newsletter back in the day when you actually mailed things using stamps in the Postal Service. You know, we couldn’t look at how many people opened, but we had a list of about a thousand people were sending out to.

     

    00;02;51;15 - 00;03;21;14

    So during my tenure as president of Women in Neuroscience, that particular group was folded into the Society of Neuroscience. And it is still an active initiative today, which is really awesome to see. So from my postdoc with that portfolio of three years of these newsletters, I joined the Next Wave team at Science Magazine and triple-A US, which is now called Science Careers, and I worked on post-doc policy and career development for science graduate students.

     

    00;03;21;14 - 00;03;39;15

    And there's so many really smart people that are so focused on their research, they couldn't see the vast opportunities for applying their passion and skills. I think this gets back to your question, Mike, about, look, there's folks that do research, but how can I be an entrepreneur and start something? And part of it is kind of looking up.

     

    00;03;39;18 - 00;04;04;07

    So when I was at the Next Wave team, I helped to support the founding of the National Postdoc Association and then went on to be a study director at the National Academies and working with esteemed scientists to research and produce reports on research workforce issues, including interdisciplinary research, international students. And on the last report I did when I was there was on women in academia.

     

    00;04;04;10 - 00;04;28;15

    So from the academies I again moved to something completely different and a tech startup where when I started there was no job description and no job title. It sounds like a tech startup. Yes, but you have to really you know, I came out of academics in that I went to two places where there is a lot of structure, right?

     

    00;04;28;17 - 00;04;53;26

    So the tech startup was like, okay. And I was also the only peer there. So I crafted my job and my job title and became the chief science officer. And I help the company build an analytics consultancy that brought the data that they were kind of collecting and munching together to these pressing research policy issues where, you know, you could kind of look at some amount of data.

     

    00;04;53;26 - 00;05;15;07

    We didn't have, you know, a lot of it that we needed to really answer these pressing issues. So this was this time was right as compute power was really starting to take off. So I have to admit, during graduate school, we had a computer that took up the size of a room. We had an old one of those things.

     

    00;05;15;09 - 00;05;35;29

    And so now a few years later, you can now crunch terabytes of data in hours rather than weeks. And I know these days you can do petabytes in microseconds. But, you know, we're getting there in the machine, sit on a desktop, Right. So this is like this wonderful period of time when people are like, oh, my gosh, what can we do?

     

    00;05;36;01 - 00;05;55;01

    And one of the wonderful things we did was work with the National Institutes of Health on a number of program evaluation projects. We had data on grants, we had data on papers, we data on people, we had data on patents. We brought all that together to help the NIH understand what is the impact of their funding in certain portfolio areas.

     

    00;05;55;03 - 00;06;30;27

    One of the projects we did was with the NIH leadership, and it was to examine what was thought to be potential bias in the awarding of research grants, a hot button topic and lots of anecdotes. So we were able to bring to bear the compute power and the data that we had to a study which led to a publication of a paper in Science magazine demonstrating a substantial gap in the likelihood of award for black NIH grant applicants, other measures being equal that spurred the NIH to examine their review process.

     

    00;06;30;27 - 00;06;53;26

    I'm really, really proud of this work, and I'm proud that the NIH took action, both partnered with us on the work and took action to try to remedy or at least further study and remedy the situation. So some of the stuff I've done, so at the same time all this was happening, startups, right, like to go through and sell and, you know, get money for the investment they've made.

     

    00;06;53;26 - 00;07;24;26

    So I was actually part of the startup's management team that was pitching for our acquisition and we were eventually purchased by Thomson Reuters. And overnight we went from a team of about 50 people to a team of about 50,000 people. It is a really big change and I'm the kind of person that really likes the scrappy energy of startups where you can be super nimble and change your mind and oh, maybe we should do this today and started looking for an opportunity to build something new.

     

    00;07;24;26 - 00;07;44;25

    So I did the kind of spin in, you know, with the the group. So I did the spin out with the National Post Association. I did the spin in with the evaluation team and analytics team at Discovery Logic, Thomson Reuters. And then it was like, okay, I want to try something else. And this would actually be Let's start a company from the beginning, right?

     

    00;07;44;28 - 00;08;12;29

    And I had the phenomenal opportunity to come on board at as ORCID was just starting. And so I became the founding executive director and I was the first staff hire. There was already a board and bylaws and all these other things, but they didn't have any staff. So I became the founding executive director and it was just awesome. I cannot tell you how wonderful that it was, just every day on my hip pinch myself.

     

    00;08;12;29 - 00;08;46;06

    I can't believe I have this. Jobs is great. So I helped to. I have to build the operational infrastructure. I built a team and with the team, a globe of community and technology infrastructure for researcher identifiers. So ORCID is essentially a digital name for researchers that connect us with all of our professional activities and contribution. So in eight years we managed to reach financial sustainability is this is a nonprofit and we had over 10 million registered researchers, a thousand members and national consortia in 40 countries.

     

    00;08;46;13 - 00;09;07;28

    I was delighted, but it was also time for me to move on because we got where I wanted to get to. It was built and now we had to move into more of a maintenance mode. Then let's build, build, build, right. I was ready for my next build project and I stepped out in 2020 to create Mighty Red Barn, which is, as you said, a consultancy for social impact startups.

     

    00;09;07;28 - 00;09;32;05

    So here we are. Well, I'm worried that you're going to go start another company before this podcast is over, but your role at ORCID seems like a pretty big deal when you think about how critical digital persistent identifiers are. Tell me what you're trying to get done at ORCID or what you were working on at ORCID. Why digital identifiers are so important.

     

    00;09;32;08 - 00;09;53;09

    Yeah, So I guess the way to explain that is, you know, as you move from print, you know, people going to the library, when I started graduate school, we would go to the library, have a lot of time at the photocopy machine, photocopying stuff from journals. You know, people don't do that anymore. And everyone's looking for stuff on the Internet now.

     

    00;09;53;09 - 00;10;14;06

    You can't find things on the Internet unless you have a good key for finding things. Right. And for researchers, anybody with the name notices in my name, I have a fairly unique name, but it's not unique enough to be able to find all of the things that I've done and attach them to me. Even Google still gets me wrong.

     

    00;10;14;06 - 00;10;47;00

    I get messages every three weeks saying, Could you please update your record? So what ORCID does is it provides individuals with essentially this digital name, a unique digital persistent identifier that they can use as they're going through their regular workflows. Right. So for example, when you're applying for a grant, when you're registering as a new graduate student, when you're submitting a manuscript or a dataset to a repository, part of that transaction is you including your name and your digital name, your ORCID I.D, as you're going through that workflow process.

     

    00;10;47;06 - 00;11;11;10

    So it's not asking you to do any additional work other than basically using ORCID single sign on to go log into these systems, the systems, collect your ID and then attach that ID to the transaction. So now your paper includes your ORCID ID, now your grant includes your ORCID ID, your record at your university, includes your ORCID ID, etc., etc..

     

    00;11;11;10 - 00;11;34;24

    So part of that workflow and one of the things I was really, really big on since graduate school was this idea that research outputs are so much more than just journal articles, right? This huge motivation for me, articles are how we talk about the work we do, right? But there's datasets, there's software code, there's instruments made. This committee is mentoring, teaching.

     

    00;11;34;24 - 00;12;05;14

    All of these things are integral parts of the research process. So ORCID was not just about, Here's my ORCID IDs. I publish a paper. It was a way to say to the individual, here you have power in determining what to include in your professional body of work. This is your idea. You decide when and where to use it, and you can also decide what is available on your ORCID profile for public view or sharing with trusted parties.

     

    00;12;05;14 - 00;12;34;03

    We were all about providing that power and agency to the individual and based on this presupposition, that individual should control what information is shared publicly regarding their digital reputation. And yeah, so I'm I'm proud that ORCID was has been and continues to be part of the story of providing a way for research as an agency over how they are viewed on the Internet and how people can find and see what they've been doing.

     

    00;12;34;06 - 00;12;58;24

    Yeah, it sounds like the way an artist would sign their painting, right? Except providing a digital way, a digital recognition of that. Right. And you started to see more artists using digital identifiers at DMS, things like that, to say, this is my work and essentially coded in the back end. So you can't steal or repurpose the art without some recognition or citation of the artist.

     

    00;12;58;24 - 00;13;22;07

    That's all of what this is about. Yeah, the applications go way beyond researchers. Yes. Yes. Now, as promised, we need to get these folks from research to commercialization. I've never seen science and research move so fast as it did during the pandemic, and of course, with good reason, we didn't have a lot of time to putz around with red tape and bureaucracy as we had to get a product to the market.

     

    00;13;22;13 - 00;13;46;22

    Now it feels like on university campuses around the world, there's a sense of look up our support and resources because we might have to do that again or produce spin outs. What does that framework look like today and what is the level of support? Yeah, and so I think, you know, part of this is how do folks in academics do commercial work, right?

     

    00;13;46;23 - 00;14;14;22

    And so I think starting off with how do we talk about ownership? And one of the big differences between academic and commercial research, of course, is intellectual property rights. Who owns the research output shapes how information is shared and how and what can be moved into a product, right? So for me, during COVID, one of the most impressive demonstrations of the power of open collaboration is the National COVID Cohort Collaborative.

     

    00;14;14;22 - 00;14;46;04

    Also known as NC three. And I love identifiers. They used open identifiers including ORCID and dyes and organization identifiers to attribute who made what data contribution, which is really awesome. And they also coupled that with this this really strong metadata framework that enabled the combination and the combination of contributed datasets and components of dataset. Talk about awesome. This is not something you could do in one company.

     

    00;14;46;04 - 00;15;33;05

    This requires a collaboration across labs and across corporate. This work was instrumental in driving early data sharing during the pandemic, so you couldn't have gotten the product without that data sharing, right? And part of that data sharing happened, at least in part because everyone who contributed data to the collaborative knew they would get credit, even if another group did the analysis and knew that if some missed study that was contributed or some dataset that was contributed was later withdrawn, that that data could be withdrawn from their analysis as well because of the way that persistent identifiers in metadata had been that that framework had been set up at the get go in NC three.

     

    00;15;33;12 - 00;16;00;12

    So the group managing the collaborative actually won the inaugural Data Works and Challenge Prize for data sharing earlier this year, and I encourage you to check it out. Is really phenomenal piece of work. And I personally think that's the way we need to start thinking about getting product to market is the step before that which is how do we enable data sharing that allows people to collaborate on these problems?

     

    00;16;00;14 - 00;16;18;28

    Yeah, after this, I think you should go work in Hollywood because, you know, you are you see these screenplays that were written by about 11 or 12 people and it's like, okay, who contributed what? Right now that industry kind of has the same problems of people being, you know, the collaborations and what was mine versus what was else's.

     

    00;16;19;01 - 00;16;58;05

    Right. But, you know, the world needs solutions. And the younger you are, the more you've gotten used to near instant gratification. We're used to seeing things happen. So have expectations and research shifted as well, or our research institutions moving as fast to commercialization as they can? What's driving that need to commercialize? Yeah, I mean, you've got the by dual act that shifted everything, at least in the US and there's been a strong push ever since then was in the mid-eighties right of where universities set up tech transfer offices and you know have patent attorneys on staff advising people.

     

    00;16;58;05 - 00;17;23;14

    There's a number of universities that have spin out incubators, things like that. If I don't think it's getting faster, if anything, I think some universities are realizing there's a huge amount of effort and money that they're putting into these centers that they may not be recouping there. It hasn't been a fast win for many universities in this space, but it's certainly active.

     

    00;17;23;17 - 00;17;49;08

    I think, again, coming back to my previous comment, I think in addition to these spin outs and commercialization, where academic IP intellectual property is acquired by a commercial entity, I think what I would love to see is more people considering this collaborative model, right? One in which there is incentive baked in for data sharing by all parties.

     

    00;17;49;08 - 00;18;16;24

    Right. And I like to see this civilly. Is it science fiction? Right. We can look at how high energy physics is done, right? There's this large inter-country collaboration at CERN using shared equipment and management. And, you know, researchers can openly access this facility, you know, by applying to work there. And three, this a covered example I just mentioned proved this concept in biomedical sciences.

     

    00;18;16;24 - 00;18;43;18

    Right. What I see that similar in both of these models is both the intent to collaborate on big Thorny and of course, expensive like really crushingly. You need to answer the question right now. Problems. There's also the willingness to fund at the highest levels. And I think this might be what is changing a little bit where you see and an agent and a NSF starting to fund these larger collaborative efforts.

     

    00;18;43;18 - 00;19;09;27

    I'm really happy to see these things happening. And then also what, NC three and to some extent CERN and others have done is operationalizing attributions using these open and persistent digital identifiers, not just for people, not just for the papers, but for all of the things and the places that are involved in the project so that you can kind of deconstruct and tease apart and understand, Hey, I did this part and I did that part right?

     

    00;19;09;27 - 00;19;35;15

    So everyone participating gets credit. Whether you build a detector, develop the methods, collect the samples, perform the analysis, curate the dataset, or even fund the initiative or house the researchers and the equipment. Right? All of that. Everyone understands your different part of it. And I think there is room in this collaborative model for academic and commercial and government entities to work together.

     

    00;19;35;18 - 00;20;02;18

    Collaboration. It reduces the upfront development costs for companies, It enables broad talent sharing, which is pretty awesome. It allows, like the postdocs in the academic lab to get some corporate experience working in these collaborations. And it also leverages the strengths of each sector the ideas, the innovation product to market, which most people in academia never think about product to market as well as risk reduction.

     

    00;20;02;18 - 00;20;31;14

    Right. Which again, most people in academia are thinking about risk reduction. And I would love to see more research groups looking into these cooperative business structures as an option for bringing products to market. We provide recognition, operational frameworks and I think also really important is this idea of equity for all of the parties involved in this. And you asked for some practical examples and there's actually a co-op accelerator program at START that co-op.

     

    00;20;31;14 - 00;20;52;24

    So it's not like you can only get startups through a venture model. You can also get or a venture for profit model. You can also get startups moving through these accelerator programs that are really focused on the co-op structure. So something to look at. If you've met a lot of startup founders, you start to see they have a unique set of talents and drivers.

     

    00;20;52;24 - 00;21;20;16

    You know, research entrepreneurs, PhDs may not be like them. That may not come naturally. They've got to learn product market fit, funding strategies, sales, marketing, regulatory compliance, business skills. It's kind of not fair. It's like that, Is it not enough? I'm not a research genius now. I have to be Richard Branson on top of that. Right, Right. So our grad schools, are anyone helping train them to be entrepreneurs or is it assumed they probably don't need to be?

     

    00;21;20;17 - 00;21;42;02

    Yeah. And it's funny because, like, our entrepreneurs are actually trained to be entrepreneurs is like, where does that come from? Well, it's almost natural inside me, right? I'm going to say it probably wasn't natural. Looking at any number of things is exposure to certain ideas and concepts and ways of thinking and doing that happen. Right? And so I'm going to tell a story.

     

    00;21;42;02 - 00;22;05;08

    I can tell a story here. So back in the day when I was at Science magazine, working on Next Wave, working on postdoc policy, that was when my first kid was born. Okay, fast forward 20 years, several stops later in my career, and I returned to pursue our policy in an early career workforce conference sponsored by the National Bureau of Economic Research.

     

    00;22;05;08 - 00;22;27;04

    This is like two years ago. So the very same issues were on the table. And I just like, Oh my God, I feel like I stepped into the Wayback Machine, right? There's perceived poor career prospects by the postdocs. They felt stuck long terms in low paying apprenticeships, no substantive change in the ability to attract and retain diverse talent into science careers.

     

    00;22;27;04 - 00;22;52;28

    It was really frustrating even to just sit in the room and listen to the the economist talking about this. I'm like, I can't believe things haven't changed in the last 20 years. This is insane, right? So one of the key skills of researchers is our ability to focus on a problem and give it all we've got. Even if it looks hopeless, we give it all we've got.

     

    00;22;53;04 - 00;23;17;08

    And to some degree, that's a parallel skill with entrepreneurs is just like hammer away and make it happen. Right? But it also means it's really hard for us to look up and around and see what else might be good or fun or wise for our career, right? It's even more difficult to do this when the culture of science is driving for speed above all else.

     

    00;23;17;08 - 00;23;39;27

    We've got to answer this question right now. Right? Publish or perish. Publishing is so important, right? And because of that, people hold their findings really close for fear. If they're going to be scoops they don't want to share. They're not they're actually disincentivized from sharing. And they're, you know, in their cubbyholes working on their stuff. It's really not a great way to think about how can I be an entrepreneur, right?

     

    00;23;40;04 - 00;24;06;07

    So when the structure of science does not prioritize credit for all the people and it doesn't include the necessary components of the research process and what you get credit for collaboration and career development more in your question is not the outcome. So we do need entrepreneurial researchers, whether they spin out a product, run a lab, work in research policy, run a nonprofit.

     

    00;24;06;09 - 00;24;35;06

    All of these things are good skills such as team management, data sharing, budgeting, strategy and operations are all essential. And of course, looking at business, these are the same skills. Entrepreneur Sorry, entrepreneurs need to start a business to right? So these you have to have these skills, but it's not what you learn at the university, right? So the big questions are who provides the training and when is this training provided?

     

    00;24;35;06 - 00;24;58;06

    And then how? If you have the training, how do you get researchers early career and the supervisor is to prioritize participation in the training. You're supposed to be in the lab. What are you doing outside the lab? How dare you? Right. So one shining light here is the National Institutes of Health launched a program called Best Broadening Experiences in Scientific Training.

     

    00;24;58;06 - 00;25;23;18

    And this is one example of a science agency actually providing incentives through a funding program for these training experiences for grad students and postdocs. And I can tell you, I was on the review panel for one of these best sessions, and it was really interesting listening and reading what the universities were trying to do to get people just to come to the training courses that are part of their training program.

     

    00;25;23;18 - 00;25;50;20

    As a grad student and a postdoc, it was incredible the amount of resistance that there is in the university setting for having researchers do anything other than their particular experiment. There's a massive cultural challenge there. I mean, it sounds like because you're right, again, the research is doing the research because that's their passion. And it's the old thing of, you know, if I just don't think about this other thing, maybe it'll go away, right?

     

    00;25;50;23 - 00;26;11;20

    If I don't think about the fact that there's not a job for me at the end of this, maybe it'll materialize magically. Somewhere in there. Yeah. Okay. So I'm a university dean that could never happen. But just play along with me for a minute. I come to you and I say, Laure, I want to build programs and a culture around turning research into innovative product.

     

    00;26;11;25 - 00;26;34;20

    What resources do I need to make available and how do I build a supportive community around that? And I guess that speaks to the challenges of fighting that resistance, you know, getting community to pull people in. Right, Right. And so I think, you know, the other question at universities is anywhere is always cost rate. How much more do I need to invest to create these programs?

     

    00;26;34;20 - 00;26;58;02

    I think the great and wonderful answer here is that universities don't really need to invest a whole lot more to create a program. So there's a number of universities. Many, many of them already have something called a small business development centers. These are associated with the Small Business Administration, and they're staffed by business and technical advisors that can help problem solver access capital and help with business planning.

     

    00;26;58;04 - 00;27;20;04

    Woo Right. You know, I think anything new, it's already there. And they provide services to people at the university and actually at SCORE are we we collaborate with folks in the SPDC as well and we can send people from the community over to these groups at the university to get the technical assistance they need. That is beyond the scope of what we do in this program.

     

    00;27;20;04 - 00;27;45;13

    So I think it's less a matter of the university setting up more resources. It's really more connecting entrepreneurs with the resources that are already in the community. And I mean, frankly, we run into the same challenge with data sharing. There's tons of resources available through the university library, but researchers often have no clue to reach out to the librarian for help with data sharing.

     

    00;27;45;16 - 00;28;18;21

    So I think all of us researchers have myopia, but so do research administrators and services like SDB sees and score as well. Right? How do we reach and run the workshops, walk the halls? Right. We have to be really proactive and go out and engage with the researchers, meet them where they're at, and engage with these groups of people about entrepreneurial skills, practices, meeting with mentors, things like that.

     

    00;28;18;21 - 00;28;37;01

    So I think all of us need to do better at looking up and out, asking for help, listening. And, you know, it's not just product market fit. It's like the focus groups that we always tell entrepreneurs to do. I think the services that are out there for entrepreneurs also need to do the same thing. I think about biotech and medical research entrepreneurs.

     

    00;28;37;01 - 00;29;09;15

    They've got like an extra bucket of problems because they have to work with the health care industry. Highly regulated, very complicated, not big risk takers when where innovation is concerned, can the sharing of data be a difference maker in all that? What data should the researcher bring to the table and how to smooth process? Yeah, so there are two wonderful sets of guidelines that are out there and people are working on implementing them and they have really great acronyms.

     

    00;29;09;15 - 00;29;31;29

    One is called CARE and the other is called FAIR. Right? So I think this this comes back my to your question, there is no one way to answer that question. I think the ways you answer this question is by providing a framework that allows people to use a framework to answer the question for their particular situation. Okay, So FAIR stands for findable, accessible, interoperable and reusable.

     

    00;29;31;29 - 00;29;48;27

    And it tells us how to share. It tells you how to create your data set, use persistent identifiers, you know, make sure that this is there is some way for people to request access to your data set, whether that it's in a repository of a landing page, make sure it's interoperable, that there is a good set of metadata.

     

    00;29;48;27 - 00;30;10;29

    Well, describe to explain what the heck's in your dataset. Right. And then make sure it's reusable, right. That there is some way to pull it down into a file, share it. It's already in a database or our code, whatever it is, right? That that's all there. So that's FAIR. How do I create and curate my data set so that it is accessible and usable by other people?

     

    00;30;11;01 - 00;30;37;02

    But there's also another component that is as important, and these are enshrined or encompassed in the CARE principles, and these were developed through the lens of Indigenous data sovereignty, and they provide a framework for what to share, right? So CARE stands for collective benefit authority to control responsibility and optics. And like when you're working with biomedical data, you know you can't share personal level data, period.

     

    00;30;37;08 - 00;30;58;10

    That is ethically wrong. To share personal level data, you have to identify it. So that's a component of, for example, what you could put in CARE. Do you have the authority to control the data that you're sharing, or does somebody else have the authority? For what benefit are these data being shared? These are all really important questions to ask when you're when you're sharing data.

     

    00;30;58;10 - 00;31;18;01

    So as gets to like, I'm really big on attribution, right? So I think and I don't think it's even I think I'm just going to make the bold statement that we have to recognize the rights of the people from whom data are collected. I think for too long we've only recognized the rights of the people who are collecting the data.

     

    00;31;18;06 - 00;31;42;15

    Right. And I don't think that finders keepers should be the ruling ethos for how we share data. I think we can do a lot better and the CARE principles get us there with that collective benefit authority, control, responsibility and ethics framework. And so between CARE and FAIR, we address for people and purpose, and together the guidance is share your data as openly as possible and as closed as necessary.

     

    00;31;42;15 - 00;32;06;28

    So there isn't just open data shared with everybody. It's like, let's really think through what's in this data set. Do I have authority to share it? What is my responsibility for protecting the information that's in this data set, and how can I collectively benefit the community by sharing? How can I do this in an effective way? And I really, really love how these two sets of principles work together and foster this way of thinking.

     

    00;32;06;28 - 00;32;35;02

    This framework about intellectual property that is intentionally respectful for the full set of stakeholders and rights holders of the data that's represented in the data set. So that may not be as specific as an answer as you want, but I think that's the best way to address this is using these frameworks. It does. It sounds like it. Oracle for Research has actually provided research to commercialization support for a handful of researchers like University of Bristol biotech spin out Halo Therapeutics. Is that a good role for a big old tech company like Oracle to play? Is that appropriate? Oh my God. When I met you guys at the Research Data Alliance meeting, I was so excited to know that there's Oracle for Research exists and that you guys are providing tech support for founders. I think it's awesome.

     

    00;32;54;07 - 00;33;23;23

    I do. And this is part of the collaboration I'm talking about. You have skills and resources that startups don't, and to be able to share those resources is for the collective benefit of all the parties. Awesome, right? So I think, you know, this small grant funding and technical support that you guys have done with the community, support those folks that are our need to use or want to use cloud computing, super important community building is also a big one for me, obviously, right?

     

    00;33;23;26 - 00;34;00;19

    Bringing together aspiring entrepreneurs to share their stories, to meet with mentors, to meet with other entrepreneurs. It may be a little bit farther along the pathway. Super important to do that and you're starting to do what you're doing that a bit right? Supporting collaborations. One of the things I've heard over and over again in this data space is, yes, there's these cloud computing services, but one of the big challenges is the middleware that's needed to enable access to the data in the cloud server that's respectful of privacy and any like data sharing challenges that you might have.

     

    00;34;00;19 - 00;34;25;28

    Right. In that that federated sign and piece is really challenging for a lot of folks building these data infrastructures. So there may be some some role that you can play in helping to support collaborations to answer some of those questions. And it's not saying that there's a particular product that you guys can build, but maybe say, hey, here's some options, here's how they can be implemented, here's some folks doing it right.

     

    00;34;25;29 - 00;34;52;09

    Why don't we have a meeting or something to help others figure out how to also implement those? And then the thing you guys have been doing, again, partnering. We talked about research, data Alliance. I think you also participate in these giant and TNC meetings looking for opportunity is to work with research networks and identity federations and data sharing alliances in developing these cross-platform solutions that work on a global scale.

     

    00;34;52;15 - 00;35;22;04

    All of those are great. So I think when I look at this, is providing some hope right. We have this great idea as an entrepreneur and is like, Oh my God, how am I going to do this Right? Providing some hope to those of us who who want to start developing a tech-based product for the research community, that someone out there is willing to share some resources to help us test our idea.

     

    00;35;22;04 - 00;35;51;10

    I think that that would be the way I would think about it. Yeah, well, technology as a driver, it's an enabler for nearly all research entrepreneurs and biotech founders. There's no way around that. But as we're seeing with AI, technology appears to pop up and move at incredible speed. So what do you think researchers should be doing to make sure they understand what the right technology is and how to use it for things like cost, performance, security, flexibility, scale, those things?

     

    00;35;51;13 - 00;36;14;02

    Yeah. And so I was thinking about this and, you know, tech is necessary for everyone, as you know. Right. And, you know, I work with a lot of small businesses through my SCORE mentoring volunteer service. Right. And these are people starting restaurants and hair salons and retail outlets. And, you know, they're like, how do I do this? They also have to use cloud-based solutions, right?

     

    00;36;14;02 - 00;36;38;18

    Accounting, e-commerce platforms. They have internal external communication platforms like the storage slack and other things like that, discord on customer management systems out there. All of these things people think of tech and they think of cloud computing and massive compute resources that you need for time. Actually, yes, you need that, but you also need these other cloud solutions.

     

    00;36;38;18 - 00;37;00;14

    If you're going to run a business, you have to have all of these other kind of operational pieces as well. Right? And there's other things like, Oh my God, I have to look at mileage tracking and receipts management, inventory control, all the things no one wants to think about, but they're all essential parts of running a company. And all of these to also have cloud-based solutions.

     

    00;37;00;14 - 00;37;20;21

    You don't have to do stuff on a spreadsheet that's only on your computer. You can have it in the cloud, you can move around. This information comes with, you can easily share, you can collaborate on documents. And I think Mike, to some degree, I think people need to pay attention to this as well, right? They have to do this as well.

     

    00;37;20;23 - 00;37;42;06

    Things like SCORE, right? Used to be only face to face mentoring now is almost I think over 90% of mentors now in the space of three years shifted from face to face to virtual meetings and like it was like, oh, I didn't do this earlier. An orchid was run as a virtual office From the very beginning. We never had a building, never.

     

    00;37;42;10 - 00;38;12;28

    And my consultancy is also virtual, right? So it's how do we use these wonderful cloud-based resources to really expand how we can do our work, where we do our work and open up time that we didn't have before because we were running around or trying to share documents through email or trying to collect all these things that the cloud is made possible for us that really enable collaborative work I think is great.

     

    00;38;12;28 - 00;38;34;14

    So your question, what tech do you use? And this is a question that can't be answered easily. Again, it depends on the stage of your company, the size and scale of your team where you're operating and of course your product, right? So I will always take an iterative approach, have a conversation. Where are you in your evolution as a company?

     

    00;38;34;14 - 00;38;55;19

    What is your product? What are your needs? And then also make sure my big advice is make sure when you pick a technology for whatever it is that, it is something you can evolve and adjust and iterate with. Then, you know, if it's one particular platform, make sure has an API, make sure you can get your data in and out of it.

     

    00;38;55;23 - 00;39;18;21

    So as your needs evolve, you can transition to something else if you need to. That better suits you need as a company. Don't get locked into a particular solution because you'll find like if you get locked into one, I don't know, customer relationship management system or fundraising system. And then you can't move as your company gets bigger, you're kind of screwed.

     

    00;39;18;27 - 00;39;44;25

    So you have to make sure you you plan for, in my opinion, to plan for flexibility from the very beginning to allow you to grow and evolve as a company. And then that last thing, it comes back to experience at work. It ensuring privacy. What did you actually need to collect? Right? And if you have to collect personal love with data, make sure that you're ensuring the privacy of the people you're collecting it from.

     

    00;39;44;25 - 00;40;06;10

    So that's always a big one for me. And that's where Cloud Solutions not putting this stuff on your laptop are. So, so important. Well, we talked a good bit about partners and partnerships. Some people like to try to partner with our friend, the federal government. Federal funding is critical for academic and nonprofit researchers, the NIH as a funder.

     

    00;40;06;17 - 00;40;28;16

    It's driving change in the research space with things like the updated data management and sharing policy. And that policy is that researchers now have to plan and budget for the management and sharing of data when they apply for a grant. Are these mandates going to lead to real and meaningful changes or is it window dressing? What's your take?

     

    00;40;28;18 - 00;40;50;25

    Oh, another story. So one of the early community stories we did, ORCID had a question about mandates. There are always these conversations about mandates and the folks that would do put in place the mandatory oh, we couldn't possibly put in place the mandates or just irritate the people who would use it like the publishers can't put in place mandate because then the authors won't come to our platform.

     

    00;40;50;25 - 00;41;18;20

    We'd want to put up any barriers to, you know, to people using our stuff. But we did the survey and one of the questions on it was, Hey, would you want work it to be mandated by publishers? And since surprisingly, something like 80% of the respondents said mandate organ, we're like, okay. And that in turn, the funders and publishers are like, Oh, I had no idea people would be into this.

     

    00;41;18;20 - 00;41;40;14

    So that, you know, it was like researchers asking for a mandate in in a way with the researchers were asking for was would the publishers and funders please use ORCID? Please just use it so we can use it as researchers and gain the benefit. It was an interesting kind of reverse way of doing the mandate. So I think now we see these two stories about mandates.

     

    00;41;40;14 - 00;42;08;28

    You know, no one ever mandated Google search, right? It was remains as elegant and easy solution of finding things on the Internet. People still use it in droves, even with problematic privacy frameworks or revenue model. Right. It's because it's so easy. This just does what supposed to do. You get in and out your data, right? So why do we need to resort to mandates to get people to use things and do things that should be good now, which gives me to my second comeback, right?

     

    00;42;09;02 - 00;42;32;21

    Things like ORCID and data sharing are usually promoted or marketed as quote unquote good for us. It's like eating broccoli. Some people like broccoli. A lot of people don't like broccoli or they will not go out of their way to eat broccoli like a guy eats broccoli because it's good for me. But given this choice between green vegetables and I don't know, chocolate, I'm sure most people will head for the chocolate.

     

    00;42;32;24 - 00;43;08;16

    So why don't we design things and workflows and incent dev structures that provide the sweets that people want? Right? So these research policies that are enforced by mandates are usually ways getting researchers to do things that, you know, I like broccoli, I got to eat my broccoli. And then if they don't work very well because the systems haven't been designed in the workforce, haven't been designed to make it a delicious experience for the researchers, where you might I actually need to use the mandate because everything just works well.

     

    00;43;08;19 - 00;43;47;10

    Right. And the other problem here is that the culture of research is also about kind of protecting experts in this. Right. And so when you're talking about data sharing, if there isn't something that's done with data sharing that makes it attractive to share data, not just you must do it, but it's actually, hey, this is going to help me in my career, then the mandate, you know, it's just going to be this that people put up with and will find ways of getting around and delaying because they don't see the benefit to them in actually sharing the data.

     

    00;43;47;16 - 00;44;32;19

    And some people actually see harm. And that's a lot of the conversations that are happening at NIH today and over the past couple of years. It's like, what is that, that harm reduction that can be done to kind of reduce the barriers to data sharing. And so one of the projects I worked on that my consultancy was with the Federation for American Societies of Experimental Biology, also known as Faseb, putting together a program that kind of worked side by side with the NIH to see how can we as fast of this Federation of society is support the community in sharing data and make it an attractive prospect for researchers, not a grudging thing to do.

     

    00;44;32;20 - 00;45;04;15

    Right. So that gets back to I mean, you guys talk about this all the time, I'm sure. How do we work with our communities to design products and workflows that work for them, that are seamless, that are delicious, that provide a benefit? This is all user centered design. And I feel like sometimes what happens in the research community is people forget some of these basic design principles and they use these sticks through the form of mandates to get stuff accomplished because those design principles just aren't practiced in the community.

     

    00;45;04;15 - 00;45;25;19

    And so again, coming back to NC three, that big COVID collaborative, it made data sharing easy for users with this metadata model that was partly automated and also a service to help researchers with the curation process. Instead of saying you must curate your data, they'll say, Hey, you need to curate your data and we'll help you with it.

     

    00;45;25;21 - 00;46;03;14

    Huge difference, right? And at facet of this Data works project actually provided a substantial award, $100,000 for two teams that could show their data sharing and the impact that data sharing on a community that's not just a $5,000 prize, it's not just a little ribbon you get. It's a substantial award. And they had over a hundred teams submit applications for these awards and get a fabulous recognition by the NIH and the broader community and can show the way for others, Hey, we made this work.

     

    00;46;03;14 - 00;46;31;16

    Here's how made it work. They become ambassadors in the community and provide that incentive and mentoring for other people who are interested in sharing data. So I think that's what needs to happen. So you asked about, you know, what will mandate help? Yes, it has raised the urgency of data sharing in the biomedical community. Right. There's still a gap between this desired state and operationalizing how we share data.

     

    00;46;31;18 - 00;46;54;13

    And there is this series of surveys called the State of open data that happen to be going on for four years now. They've found a consistent desire among researchers to share data, but also a consistent need for more and better pathways to do so that also embed this attribution and respect components we've been talking about. So I think that's where we need to go next with the competence will make progress.

     

    00;46;54;20 - 00;47;25;15

    We're already making progress. We need to celebrate success and we also need to collaborate on a user design system and mandates like NIH is doing could be part of the solution. But they're not the solution. They're not the only thing we do. I've convinced myself I like broccoli, so self-delusion is very underrated. Yeah, well, Laurie, this has been a great conversation, super useful to those listening that are in that place of I've researched an innovative product.

     

    00;47;25;15 - 00;47;42;14

    Now what you know, thank you so much again for making the time. And if people want to know more about you or what Mighty Red Barn does, is there any contact info for you? Yeah. So you can come to my LinkedIn profile. Probably the best way to get me. I mean, I have a Twitter profile ID at Hack Yack.

     

    00;47;42;17 - 00;48;02;11

    Probably the best way, however, to get me is through my website at www dot mighty red barn dot com and there's a contact us form on there and I'm happy to talk to folks where you can contact me through LinkedIn and you to send me message that way. So yeah thank you very much I really really enjoyed the conversation today.

     

    00;48;02;11 - 00;50;14;27

    Really good questions. That's great. Me too. If you are interested in how Oracle can simplify and accelerate your research, all you have to do is check out Oracle dot com slash research and join us next time on Research in Action.