Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Inspired by a friend's unprofessional streaming show, creators sought to make a hangout-like atmosphere for real conversations.Creators left traditional media for the freedom to express themselves freely and create a hangout-like atmosphere on streaming platforms.

      Creating a professional-looking yet unprofessional streaming show was inspired by the experience of watching a friend start a show in a basement with high-quality equipment. The goal was to create a hangout-like atmosphere where real conversations could take place, despite the unconventional content. The freedom to do this without management interference was a significant motivation. Satellite radio was seen as a bridge between traditional radio and the internet, allowing for more explicit and authentic conversations. The ease of setting up events, like a poker tournament, without bureaucratic red tape was also a major advantage. Ultimately, the ability to have creative control and express oneself freely was a rewarding experience that made the challenges of working for a traditional media company worth leaving behind.

    • The Unique Dynamic of O&A RadioThe future of radio lies in embracing the internet and free speech, as exemplified by the O&A show's authentic, unscripted conversations.

      The unique and unfiltered dynamic of the O&A radio show stood out from traditional radio formats due to its authentic, unscripted conversations between friends. This contrasted with other radio shows where hosts had clear agendas and tried to manipulate the conversation. The transition to satellite radio and eventually the internet was a game-changer, as audiences craved open, honest dialogue. However, the fear of controversy and pressure from sponsors and public scrutiny often led traditional radio and satellite companies to hamstring themselves, pushing talent away and opening the door for the internet. The speaker believes that the internet, represented by the "wolf at the door," is the future of radio and that companies need to adapt to it rather than trying to suppress free speech. The O&A show, with its distinct humor and irreverent style, should have been a standalone entity on satellite radio, but was instead lumped in with other channels, making it difficult for listeners to discover. The speaker laments not making the transition to the internet earlier and suggests that companies need to embrace the unique offerings of their talent to stay competitive.

    • Understanding context and intent in communicationMisunderstandings and outrage can result from failing to recognize context and intent in communication. Clearer definitions and a nuanced understanding of language are necessary.

      In today's society, there is a loss of understanding for context and intent in communication, leading to misunderstandings and outrage. This was discussed in relation to comedian Jimmy's use of offensive material on a podcast. Some people fail to distinguish between different contexts and intentions, leading to a generic standard of judgment. Shows like ONA, which allow for edgy and controversial content, are seen as problematic by those who want to impose their own social standards. The use of terms like "violence" and "assault" in unconventional ways was also touched upon, highlighting the need for clearer definitions and a more nuanced understanding of language. Ultimately, the conversation emphasized the importance of recognizing context and intent in communication and the potential consequences of failing to do so.

    • Defining Consent in Intoxicated SituationsClear and ongoing consent is crucial in sexual encounters, especially when alcohol is involved. Changing definitions of sexual assault emphasize the importance of respecting a person's ability to consent.

      The conversation touched upon the complex and controversial issue of consent in sexual encounters, particularly when alcohol is involved. The discussion highlighted how the definition of sexual assault is evolving, with some arguing that seeking sex while a woman is intoxicated, even if both parties are drunk, can be considered sexually aggressive or assaultive. The conversation also touched upon the idea that some people believe these changing definitions are an attempt to denigrate masculinity and men's natural sexual desires. Ultimately, the conversation underscored the importance of clear and ongoing consent in sexual encounters and the need for ongoing dialogue and education around this topic.

    • Technology making material possessions less importantRomanticized views of history and mortality may lead us to desire an end to existence when faced with challenges, but recognizing the difference between art and reality is crucial.

      The advancements in technology, particularly 3D printing and the internet, have the potential to make material possessions and wealth less important, as people can create or obtain whatever they want at any time. However, some people view this as a sign of societal decline, comparing it to the excesses and chaos of ancient civilizations like Rome. This perspective is influenced by romanticized depictions of history and our own mortality, leading us to desire an end to our existence when faced with challenges or hardships. It's essential to recognize the difference between art and reality and avoid letting media distort our perceptions of ourselves and the world.

    • Men's behaviors in love: a complex mixture of lust and fascinationLove is often a temporary mix of physical attraction and fascination, and men's historically driven behaviors are being criticized, leading to misunderstandings and conflicts.

      According to the speaker, love is a complex mixture of lust and fascination that may not last long, and men's behaviors, historically driven by biology, are being criticized and judged by some, leading to misunderstandings and conflicts. The speaker also suggests that the concept of love may not be as idealized as people believe, and that habit and comfort zone can eventually replace the initial passion. The speaker expresses a cynical view of relationships and love, believing that people have been conditioned by evolution to behave in certain ways, but that these behaviors are now being frowned upon. The speaker also touches upon the idea that those who criticize these behaviors may not fully understand the dynamics of attraction and desire.

    • Misunderstandings and Hypocrisy in Gender Identity DiscourseDespite advocating for transgender rights, some individuals hold contradictory views towards feminine expression. Education and accurate information are crucial to reduce misconceptions and promote acceptance.

      There exists a significant amount of hypocrisy and misunderstanding when it comes to gender identity and expression. The discussion reveals that some people, particularly those who identify as social justice warriors, may hold contradictory views regarding transgender individuals expressing femininity versus cisgender women doing the same. Furthermore, there is a lack of understanding and education about various aspects of sex and gender, leading to misconceptions and outdated beliefs. Ultimately, it's essential to promote acceptance, understanding, and accurate information regarding gender identity and expression.

    • Navigating the Complexities of Consent and Feminism OnlineBe cautious and think critically when engaging with online content related to consent and feminism to avoid confusion, misunderstandings, and potential legal consequences.

      The rules of consent and feminism have evolved, and not everyone is adapting well. Some individuals are taking things too far, leading to confusion, misunderstandings, and even legal consequences. The anonymity of the internet has exposed a wider range of opinions and beliefs, making it easier for people to be misled or tricked. Some individuals are even creating false news or blogs, which can be easily believed due to the lack of discernment. The speaker expresses frustration with these individuals and their actions, which he sees as dangerous and confusing. He also shares anecdotes about his experiences with strange people and animals, highlighting the unexpected nature of the world around us. Overall, the speaker is urging caution and critical thinking in the face of the vast amount of information and misinformation available online.

    • Anecdote about a mischievous cat named JoeA wild, unpredictable cat named Joe brought companionship and amusement to a 'lonely cat guy's' life, despite occasional chaos.

      The speaker shares an anecdote about raising a wild, mischievous cat named Joe. Joe was a big, sixteen-pound cat with a leopard spot pattern that fetched objects and brawled with other cats. He had a peculiar fondness for girls with bare feet and would attack them playfully. The speaker found joy in Joe's antics, which included getting into various predicaments and frustrating situations. The speaker admits to being a "lonely cat guy" and mentions his past relationships, implying that he doesn't believe in love. However, the presence of Joe in his life seems to provide him with companionship and amusement. The cat's wild and unpredictable behavior is a source of entertainment for the speaker and his guests. Despite the occasional chaos, Joe adds a unique charm to the speaker's life.

    • Expressing Boundaries in FriendshipsClear communication is crucial for healthy friendships. Setting boundaries and expressing unacceptable behaviors can prevent misunderstandings and maintain positive relationships.

      Clear communication is essential in any relationship, be it romantic or platonic. Misunderstandings can lead to frustration and hurt feelings. The speaker in this conversation expressed the importance of setting boundaries and making it clear that certain behaviors are not acceptable in a friendship. He also mentioned the negative aspects of relationships, such as obligations, responsibilities, and potential financial burdens. Ultimately, the speaker emphasized the importance of maintaining the good parts of a friendship without the added pressures of a romantic relationship. Additionally, the conversation touched on the topic of gender roles and the societal expectations that come with relationships. The speaker shared his experiences with a difficult divorce and the financial and emotional toll it took on him.

    • Navigating the complexities of past relationshipsMoving forward from a difficult divorce and letting go of past grievances is essential for peace of mind. Unexpected encounters and unusual dynamics in ex-partner relationships can arise, but it's important to handle them with grace and resilience.

      The complexities and aftermaths of past relationships can bring about unexpected situations and emotions. The speaker in this discussion shares his experience of a difficult divorce and the lingering complications that came with it, including an encounter with his former lawyer who had fallen on hard times. Despite the challenges, the speaker emphasizes the importance of moving forward and not letting past grievances consume energy or peace of mind. The speaker also touches upon the unusual dynamics that can arise in relationships between ex-partners, their new romantic interests, and their children. Overall, the discussion highlights the intricacies of human relationships and the importance of navigating them with grace and resilience.

    • From Fan to Friend: Unexpected Encounters with ListenersSpeaker welcomes fans into his life, shares concerns over gun control and language manipulation, and questions the motivations behind certain laws.

      Fans can sometimes surprise us with their normalcy, as one man, who was mistaken for a stalker, turned out to be just a fan of a podcast. The speaker shared how he has welcomed fans into his life, including some of his closest friends. However, the conversation also touched on gun control and the manipulation of language by the government. The speaker expressed concern over the effectiveness and intent behind certain gun control laws, using the example of New York's magazine size restrictions. The discussion concluded with a reflection on the power of language and the potential for manipulation, drawing a parallel to George Orwell's "1984." The speaker also shared his skepticism towards the motivations behind certain laws and regulations, and his belief that they often mask more insidious intentions.

    • Discussion about potential Ebola cases and fear of misinformationBe informed but avoid spreading unverified information about health risks, and separate fact from fiction to prevent unnecessary panic.

      Fear and misinformation can lead to panic and unnecessary alarm, as seen in the recent discussion about potential Ebola cases on a plane and in Las Vegas. While it's important to be aware of health risks, especially contagious diseases with high mortality rates like Ebola, it's equally important to separate fact from fiction and avoid spreading unverified information. The discussion also touched upon the challenging living conditions in certain parts of Africa and the effects of seasickness. The drug used to prevent seasickness, scopolamine, shares similarities with the infamous Colombian devil's breath, a powerful hallucinogenic substance. However, it's crucial to remember that the dosages used for seasickness prevention are significantly lower than those used for mind-altering purposes.

    • Societal double standards towards women and animal rightsDespite men regularly hunting and killing animals, intense reactions arise when a woman does, revealing hypocrisy and sexism. Safety concerns and potential risks in extreme environments also warrant caution and preparation.

      Societal attitudes towards women and animal rights can lead to intense reactions when a woman is involved in hunting or killing animals, even if men do it regularly without controversy. The speaker expresses frustration over the hypocrisy and sexism present in these reactions. Additionally, the discussion touches upon the safety concerns and potential risks associated with extreme environments, such as aerospace facilities and African countries. The speaker expresses a fear of the unknown and the potential consequences of entering such environments, highlighting the importance of caution and preparation.

    • Human consumption of animals raises ethical concernsPractices like feeding animals processed remains and hunting contribute to health issues and extinction, while the distribution of funds from hunting tourism is questionable.

      The treatment of animals for human consumption raises ethical concerns, with practices like feeding animals processed remains leading to health issues and the hunting industry in Africa contributing to the extinction and commodification of animals. The value placed on these animals for hunting drives their survival, but the distribution of funds from hunting tourism is questionable and the vastness of Africa makes it impossible to monitor every living creature, leading to the discovery of new species. The complex relationship between humans and animals raises important questions about morality, conservation, and the impact of human actions on the natural world.

    • The Congo's Challenges in Developing Infrastructure and Overcoming CorruptionDespite the Congo's natural wealth, its instability and corruption hinder progress. Creating jobs and infrastructure could lift the population out of poverty, but outside intervention faces skepticism and potential environmental impact.

      The Congo, a region abundant in natural resources yet also known for being the poorest in the world, faces significant challenges in developing infrastructure and overcoming corruption. The area is controlled by warlords and has unstable borders, making it difficult to establish a legitimate government and centralized system. The idea of outside intervention is met with skepticism due to historical exploitation, but creating jobs and infrastructure could potentially lift the population out of poverty and improve their living conditions, despite the potential environmental impact. The Congo's situation is complex, with deep-rooted issues that require careful consideration and a long-term approach. The conversation also touched on the rapid rise and fall of social movements and the challenges of implementing change.

    • Living in Harsh Conditions: The Natural World's ComplexitiesIn some parts of the world, people and animals face unique challenges due to harsh conditions, such as insects and limited resources. These environments remind us of nature's complexities and the limitations of human ingenuity.

      Some places in the world, particularly those with vast jungles, present unique challenges that cannot be easily solved with industrialization or modern conveniences. These areas are home to people who must endure harsh conditions, including insects and limited resources. For instance, in some parts of the world, mosquitoes can be so prevalent that they can engulf a person, making it nearly impossible to stay still. Animals in these areas also face similar challenges, relying on simple methods to protect themselves from insects. The harsh realities of living in such environments are a reminder of the natural world's complexities and the limitations of human ingenuity. Additionally, the discussion touched on the idea of animals breeding with humans, resulting in hypothetical hybrid creatures, which raises questions about the biological and ethical implications of such a scenario.

    • Fascination with Unusual Species BreedingPeople's fascination with breeding unusual species raises ethical concerns and questions about societal norms, with historical examples of human-Neanderthal hybridization and modern practices involving animals like ligars, donkeys, horses, and sheep.

      People have a fascination with breeding and mating unusual species, despite ethical concerns and societal norms. This discussion touched upon various topics, including the sterility of ligars (half lion, half tiger), historical human-Neanderthal hybridization, and unusual mating practices involving animals such as donkeys, horses, and sheep. The speakers also shared personal experiences and perspectives on the desperation and lengths people might go to in the absence of human companionship. The conversation highlights the complexities and intrigings surrounding the realms of breeding, sexuality, and human nature.

    • The Importance of Consent and Self-ReflectionRemember everyone's struggles, consent is crucial, self-reflect, appreciate the small things, and find joy in life.

      People may say things they don't truly mean, especially when they're angry or frustrated. Consent is crucial, and it's important to remember that everyone has their struggles and hardships, even if they may not be apparent on the surface. The speaker acknowledges his privilege and encourages self-reflection. The discussion also touches upon the idea that people often look for reasons to be upset online, especially when they're dealing with their own dissatisfaction in life. Ultimately, the speaker reflects on his own experiences and encourages listeners to appreciate the small things and find joy in their lives.

    • The human response to chaos and frustration can lead to destructive behaviorsUnderstanding the root causes of frustration and inequality is key to preventing destructive behaviors, rather than reacting with violence and destruction.

      The human response to chaos and frustration can lead to a loss of humanity and the acceptance of destructive behaviors, such as looting and racial violence. This was evident during the Rodney King riots in Los Angeles, where people's anger and frustration led them to engage in widespread looting and violence against innocent people. The profiling and targeting of certain individuals in stores is also a response to past experiences and perceived threats, leading to a cycle of mistrust and tension. It's important to understand the underlying causes of these behaviors and find ways to address the root causes of frustration and inequality, rather than reacting with violence and destruction.

    • The 1992 Los Angeles Riots: Different Communities Received Unequal ProtectionThe 1992 LA Riots exposed societal inequalities, with wealthier areas receiving more resources and protection, leaving disenfranchised neighborhoods vulnerable. The riots also impacted freedom of speech, with some fearing backlash for discussing racial issues.

      During the 1992 Los Angeles Riots, there was a clear distinction in the level of protection and resources given to different communities. While the wealthy areas were heavily guarded, disenfranchised neighborhoods were left vulnerable. This disparity was a reflection of the value placed on different communities and their resources. The riots also had an impact on freedom of speech, with some feeling the need to be more cautious when discussing racial issues to avoid being labeled as racist. The speaker in this conversation felt unfairly targeted and fired from his job for speaking candidly about an incident of racism he witnessed during the riots. Despite the controversy, he believed in apologizing when wrong, but not for things that were not his fault. The riots highlighted the deep-rooted inequalities in society and the complexities of addressing them.

    • Interactions with strangers can lead to unexpected conflictsCommunication, empathy, and restraint are crucial in avoiding misunderstandings with strangers. Social media can amplify the impact of incidents and lead to misinterpretations.

      Interactions with strangers can escalate quickly and unpredictably, leading to confrontations and misunderstandings. The speaker's experience in New York City resulted in a physical altercation with a woman after she objected to having her picture taken. The situation became more complicated when the speaker made a comment about violence in some segments of the black community, leading to accusations of racism. The incident serves as a reminder of the importance of communication, empathy, and restraint in potentially volatile situations. Additionally, the ease of sharing information and opinions through social media can amplify the impact of such incidents and lead to misinterpretations and negative consequences.

    • Importance of strong reason and clean backgroundGreat content or subject matters more than high-quality equipment for memorable photos. Strong reasons and clean backgrounds increase chances of permit approval.

      Having great content or a compelling subject is more important than having high-quality equipment when it comes to taking memorable photographs. The speaker shared an anecdote about taking one of his best photos ever with an old phone and an unusual subject, despite the poor camera quality. Additionally, the conversation touched upon the lengths and costs required to obtain a gun license in New York, and the importance of providing evidence of a valid reason and a clean record to increase the chances of approval. The speaker also mentioned receiving threats and the necessity of providing them to the authorities as part of the application process. Overall, the discussion emphasized the significance of having a strong reason and a clean background when applying for licenses or permits.

    • Handling a gun in a dangerous situationAssess the situation, understand consequences, and de-escalate if possible. Be prepared and know when to use a gun as a last resort for self-defense.

      Handling a gun in a potentially dangerous situation requires quick thinking and careful consideration. The woman in the discussion shared her experience of being attacked and how she chose not to escalate the situation by using her gun. She emphasized the importance of assessing the situation and understanding the potential consequences of using deadly physical force. The discussion also touched upon the fluidity of life-threatening situations and the legal implications of using a gun in self-defense. The woman acknowledged her own control in the situation and the fact that she was able to de-escalate the situation without resorting to violence. However, she also emphasized the importance of being prepared and knowing when to use a gun as a last resort to save one's life. The discussion also highlighted the complexity of using social media to express emotions and the potential consequences of doing so.

    • Protecting Beliefs vs Open DialogueRecognize potential dangers of over-reliance on belief systems. Encourage open dialogue and critical thinking. Be cautious of misinformation and misconceptions.

      Some individuals and organizations prioritize protecting their brand and beliefs over open dialogue and criticism, even if it means limiting exposure to diverse perspectives. This was discussed in relation to Joel Osteen and SiriusXM, as well as religious extremism and the potential for indoctrination. It's important to recognize the potential dangers of over-reliance on any belief system, and to encourage open dialogue and critical thinking. Additionally, the discussion touched on the potential for misinformation and misconceptions, such as the belief that dinosaurs and humans coexisted, which can be harmful if taken as fact. Overall, it's crucial to approach beliefs and information with a critical and open-minded perspective.

    • Creating a Home Broadcast StudioAnthony Cumia, fired from his radio gig, transformed his home into a broadcast studio using high-end equipment and remote cameras, allowing him to conduct interviews anywhere in his house and experiment with various interview styles and locations, despite challenges in attracting guests to Long Island.

      Anthony Cumia, the host of The Anthony Cumia Show, has transformed his personal living space into a broadcast studio after being fired from his previous radio gig. He expresses his freedom to conduct interviews anywhere in his house and uses high-end equipment with the help of remote cameras and the TriCaster. The discussions in the text revolve around the logistics of setting up the studio, past events, and potential guests. Cumia's newfound independence allows him to experiment with various interview styles and locations, making his show unique. He also mentions the challenges of attracting guests to Long Island and the importance of having a flexible and versatile setup. Overall, Cumia's determination and creativity have led him to create a successful and innovative broadcasting environment from his own home.

    • Creating an Adult Streaming Platform: Overcoming Technical Challenges and MonetizationDetermined entrepreneur establishes adult streaming platform, faces technical hurdles, uses subscriptions and ads for revenue, and strives for faster audience growth.

      The speaker built a custom studio setup for streaming adult content online, facing numerous technical challenges along the way. He opted for a subscription-based model to monetize the service, keeping costs low to attract a large audience. He also incorporated advertisements, allowing advertisers to send videos that could play during the show. Despite initial success, growing the subscriber base took time, and the speaker expressed a desire for faster growth. The speaker shared anecdotes about early challenges, such as a fan believing she was speaking to Tony Danza on the phone. Overall, the speaker's determination and creativity led to the successful establishment of his online streaming platform.

    • Limited creative freedom after merger with SiriusAfter a merger, creative teams may face restrictions and limited freedom, resulting in increased bureaucracy and financial burdens, but they can still find ways to engage their audience through alternative means.

      During their time at XM Radio, the team created humorous content that resonated with listeners. However, after a merger with Sirius, they faced restrictions and were not allowed to produce similar content anymore. Instead, they were met with middle management bureaucracy and were asked to pay large sums of money for approved projects. The team's creative freedom was limited, and they were unable to execute their ideas for events and cruises. Despite the challenges, they continued to find ways to entertain their audience through radio descriptions of their pranks and antics.

    • Traditional radio vs. podcasting: Flexibility and cost differencesPodcasting offers cost savings, flexibility, and resilience compared to traditional radio's expensive infrastructure and logistical challenges

      The traditional radio industry's business model and infrastructure come with significant financial burdens and logistical challenges that smaller, more agile operations like a podcast can avoid. The speaker's experience of being asked for a large sum of money for an appearance and the comparison of their own setup to a large, expensive radio studio highlight these differences. Traditional radio's reliance on satellites and large facilities, which can be vulnerable to various issues, contrasts with the flexibility and simplicity of podcasting from a home setup. The speaker's ability to adapt to a power outage and continue their show using an iPhone demonstrates the resilience and adaptability of podcasting. These factors contribute to the potential for podcasts to thrive and grow, while traditional radio may struggle to keep up with the changing media landscape.

    • Exploring Home Video Production with Green Screens and TricastersIndividuals can now create professional-looking videos from home using green screens and tricasters, offering advantages in today's media landscape but presenting challenges in terms of setup and presentation.

      Technology has advanced significantly in recent years, enabling individuals to create complex video productions from home with green screens and tricasters. Keith, the speaker in this conversation, shares his experience of setting up a home studio with a fake desk and a green screen, allowing him to manipulate backgrounds and create the illusion of a larger studio. He also discusses the advantages of visual content in today's media landscape and the challenges of maintaining a video-based show, such as the need to always be presentable on camera. Despite the complexity of the setup and the learning curve, Keith expresses his fascination with video production and the tools now available to create engaging content. The conversation also touches on the frustration of dealing with outdated infrastructure, such as power outages and old wiring, which can disrupt traditional methods of content creation. Overall, the conversation highlights the transformative power of technology in media production and the evolving expectations of audiences for visually rich content.

    • Home vs Studio: Adjusting to New Workspaces and Ethics of Speaking OutIndividuals discuss the unexpected challenges of producing content from home and the ethical dilemmas of speaking out about previous employers, while also touching upon the complexities of subscription numbers reporting.

      The conversation between the two individuals revolved around their experiences with producing content from home versus a professional studio setup, and the unexpected challenges that come with being terminated from a job and the ensuing legal proceedings. During the discussion, they shared their observations about the strange feeling of conversing on camera while sitting next to each other, and the adjustments they've had to make to their home environments as their workspaces. They also touched upon their plans to eventually secure a dedicated space for their work. Additionally, they discussed their recent experiences with being let go from their previous employment and the process of pursuing compensation for the remainder of their contracts. The termination led to a conversation about the ethics of disparaging a company, and the distinction between expressing personal opinions and damaging the company's reputation. They also delved into the complexities of subscription numbers and how they are reported, suggesting that there might be discrepancies between the actual number of subscribers and the reported figures. Overall, the conversation highlighted the unique challenges of producing content and navigating the business side of media.

    • The outdated nature of traditional radio vs podcastingRadio's focus on subscriptions and specific broadcast times is outdated compared to podcasting's on-demand, flexible listening experience and access to more precise listener data.

      The traditional radio industry is outdated in comparison to podcasting, with the focus on subscriptions being a major archaic aspect. The speaker recalls a meeting with their radio boss who only cared about subscriptions, despite barely listening to their show. They found it strange that listeners had to tune in during specific times for radio shows, while podcasts allow for on-demand listening with the ability to pause and rewind. The speaker also questions the validity of radio ratings, which are based on diaries that may not be accurately returned. In contrast, podcast platforms like SiriusXM likely have access to more precise listener data. The speaker expresses frustration with the blowhard behavior of some radio personalities, but acknowledges that some still listen to traditional radio. Overall, the speaker sees podcasting as a more modern and flexible alternative to traditional radio.

    • People's tendency to believe in conspiracy theories overshadows rational thinkingPeople disregard evidence and focus on theories, leading to unproductive debates and lack of evidence-based conclusions on various topics

      Some individuals have a tendency to jump to conspiracy theories without considering logical explanations or facts. They often disregard evidence that contradicts their beliefs and instead focus on information that supports their theories. This behavior can lead to heated debates and a lack of productive discussion on various topics. For instance, people have spread conspiracy theories about events like 9-11, the Gulf of Tonkin incident, and even chemtrails. These theories often involve complex, movie-like scenarios that require extensive planning, but lack solid evidence. Moreover, the prevalence of cameras and smartphones has made it increasingly difficult for UFO sightings to go unrecorded, yet there are few authentic UFO videos available. This shows that people's tendency to believe in conspiracy theories can sometimes overshadow rational thinking and evidence-based conclusions.

    • Encounters with Wildlife: Nature's Power and Technology's RoleNature's power and resilience can be appreciated through technology-assisted observation, but it can also outmatch technology. Human interaction with nature requires understanding and respect.

      Nature and technology can coexist but may sometimes clash. The speaker shares stories of encounters with wildlife, from mountain lions to hawks, captured on video, showcasing nature's power. He also discusses the rivalry between different species, such as hawks and crows. The speaker suggests using technology, like security cameras and drones, to observe wildlife from a distance. However, he acknowledges that nature can outmatch technology, as seen in the hawk vs. drone video. The conversation also touches on gun laws and hunting methods, highlighting the challenges and complexities of human interaction with nature. Overall, the conversation underscores the importance of appreciating the natural world and acknowledging its power and resilience.

    • Encounters with Mountain Lions: Powerful and Dangerous AnimalsMountain lions are powerful hunters that can pose a threat to humans, and despite our technological advancements, we must respect their strength and power in nature.

      Mountain lions are powerful and dangerous animals that can pose a threat to humans, especially in areas where they are prevalent. Hunting them was once a common practice, but due to their increasing population and attacks on humans, they are now protected in many places. Mountain lions are strong and agile hunters that use their faces to catch their prey, and they can deliver powerful attacks. Their strength and power make them formidable opponents, and encounters with them can be dangerous and even deadly. Despite our technological advancements and weapons, we are relatively weak compared to these animals. It's a reminder of the natural world's power and the importance of respecting it.

    • Consistency is key to hosting a successful live showPrepare with a specific time, engage with audience through interactive platforms, invest in preparation, and keep the event fun and rewarding for all involved.

      Consistency is key when it comes to hosting a successful live show. The speaker emphasized the importance of setting a specific time for the event and being fully prepared to engage with the audience. Interactivity was also highlighted as a crucial element, with the use of platforms like Pal Talk allowing for more direct engagement with viewers. The speaker shared that they put a great deal of effort into their preparation for the show and found it rewarding to connect with their audience in real-time. They also mentioned the importance of keeping the event fun and engaging for both the host and the viewers. Overall, the speaker encouraged those interested to subscribe and be a part of the experience.

    Recent Episodes from The Joe Rogan Experience

    #2179 - Bridget Phetasy

    #2179 - Bridget Phetasy
    Bridget Phetasy is a writer and stand-up comedian. She hosts the podcast “Walk-Ins Welcome” and co-hosts the podcast “Factory Settings” with her husband Jeren Montgomery. She also leads the YouTube program “Dumpster Fire.” www.phetasy.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2178 - Sam Morril

    #2178 - Sam Morril
    Sam Morril is a stand-up comic, writer, and actor. He's the co-host of the "We Might Be Drunk" podcast with Mark Normand. Catch his new special, "You've Changed" on Prime Video.  www.sammorril.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2177 - Chris Robinson

    #2177 - Chris Robinson
    Chris Robinson is the lead singer and co-founder of the rock band The Black Crowes. The bands critically acclaimed and first new album in 15 years "Happiness Bastards” is out now. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2176 - Chad Daniels

    #2176 - Chad Daniels
    Chad Daniels is a stand-up comic and a host of the "Middle of Somewhere" and "Pretend Problems" podcasts. Watch his new special, "Empty Nester," on Netflix. www.chaddaniels.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2175 - Sam Tallent

    #2175 - Sam Tallent
    Sam Tallent is a stand-up comic, host of "Sam Tallent's Wide World," co-host of "The Chubby Behemoth" Podcast, and author of "Running the Light." His latest special, “The Toad’s Morale,” is available on YouTube. www.samtallent.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2174 - Annie Jacobsen

    #2174 - Annie Jacobsen
    Annie Jacobsen is a Pulitzer Prize finalist, investigative journalist, and bestselling author. Her latest book, “Nuclear War: A Scenario,” is out now. www.anniejacobsen.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2173 - Jimmy Dore

    #2173 - Jimmy Dore
    Jimmy Dore is a stand-up comic, political commentator, and host of "The Jimmy Dore Show" on YouTube. Watch his new special, "Covid Lies Are Funny," at jimmydore.com. Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    #2172 - Sebastian Junger

    #2172 - Sebastian Junger
    Sebastian Junger is a bestselling author, journalist, and an Academy Award-nominated documentary filmmaker. His latest book, "In My Time of Dying", is available now. www.sebastianjunger.com Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Cancer Topics – Delivering Serious News (Part 2)

    Cancer Topics – Delivering Serious News (Part 2)

    In the second of this two-part ASCO Education Podcast episode, Drs. Stephen Berns (University of Vermont), Tyler Johnson (Stanford Medicine), and Katie Stowers (Oregon Health & Science University) continue their discussion about what it takes to deliver serious news to people with cancer effectively and compassionately.

    If you liked this episode, please subscribe. Learn more at https://education.asco.org, or email us at education@asco.org.

     

    TRANSCRIPT

    [MUSIC PLAYING]

     

    STEVE BURNS: Hello, and welcome to the second part of ASCO's Education Podcast focused on clinician-patient communication in the context of delivering serious news to patients and families. My name is Steve Burns. I'm an internist, hospice, and palliative care physician and associate professor of medicine at the University of Vermont College of Medicine. Once again, I'm joined by Katie Stowers, a hospice and palliative care physician and assistant professor of medicine at the Oregon Health Science University, and Tyler Johnson, a medical oncologist and clinical assistant professor of medicine at Stanford University.

    In our previous episode, we spoke about what constitutes serious news, the best modalities for delivering serious news particularly in the wake of COVID, who might be the best person to deliver it, and the importance of the care team as a whole. We left off on the question, how do we prepare for delivering serious news? Let's continue the conversation.

    [MUSIC PLAYING]

     

    TYLER JOHNSON: Katie was talking about how we need to be realistic about the way that a conversation is going to impact us in addition to the way that it's going to impact the patient. And one thing that I have realized is that a headline, for those who maybe haven't had evals of training, is just a concise summary statement of sort of the big picture of what's going on, just like buying a newspaper article.

    And what I have recognized is that oftentimes, I have this almost visceral reaction against giving a headline. And if I drill down just a little bit, what I find is I don't want to give the headline because then I'm really going to have to say things the way that they are, right? If I give a five minute disquisition on creatinine and edema and chemotherapy, immunotherapy, therapeutic options and whatever, right? Then, I can just like talk a cloud around things and never actually say what it is that I'm trying to say, which then gives me the advantage of feeling like I said it, but actually sort of knowing that I never actually said it, right?

    And so I think the thing that the headline does is it forces me to say the thing. And then once the thing is out in the open, then we can talk about, if necessary and appropriate, some of the other nuances and whatever. But all of that is to say that often, the greatest barrier to doing that is an unwillingness to be real with myself about the information that I'm really trying to convey.

    KATIE STOWERS: I think this is another really great opportunity where when partners go in together, it's easier to get into the moment if you get the opportunity. Someone with a little bit of accountability, but also somebody to help you. Maybe you're able to get out the facts and they're able to tie-in the meaning. Or you end up going bigger than your headline and they're able to say, I think what you were trying to say was dah-dah-dah-dah-dah, and help really get back to that core.

    STEVE BURNS: It does say that we all, before we share serious news, making sure whoever you're going in with, you're on the same page. And having a pre-meeting is so important. And what I often do with my pre-meetings is I come up with the headline as the group, right? So we're all clear about what is that headline so that when we go in, we can, in some ways, also hold each other accountable for that headline.

    KATIE STOWERS: I think also, a little bit of who's going to say it too. Like, is that something that you feel comfortable saying, or would it be easier for somebody else to say? Are there parts of it, and then parts of it that I can do, I think, can be really helpful.

    TYLER JOHNSON: Yeah. It's funny, because sometimes, even though I'm pretty tuned into these things and I try really hard to do them well, I still find that there are times as a medical oncologist when the palliative care doctor who is unfailingly ever so nice and gracious about it, ends up being like the real human translator for my medical leads. So I, like, say some word cloud. And then the palliative care doctor, like Katie just said, is like, if I can say that what Dr. Johnson was trying to say right there is something in normal human English speak.

    And then, as soon as they do that, I'm like, oh. But that can actually be really helpful. And again, I think it's obviously not meant to slight me. It's not meant as an affront, right? It's just sometimes, it's just kind of hard to quite get there, right, and to quite say the thing. And sometimes, having someone to help. Like, you get 80% of the way there, and then having somebody else get the other 20% is really, really meaningful.

    And it also, in a strange way, kind of allows us to share the emotional burden a little bit, right? So that it doesn't feel like, oh my gosh, this is just me saying this thing. There's something about having other members of the team there to kind of hold your arms up as you're doing that that's really meaningful.

    KATIE STOWERS: I worry that part of this conversation is saying like, oh. Some people are really good at this. Some people aren't. I don't think that this is a palliative care physician's good the whole time. I think this is a normal human experience. This just happened to me. This week in clinic where my patient was like, you just told me like a five minute story of things I already know. And I still don't know any more information. And I was like, oh, that wasn't really clear at all, was it?

    So I mean, I think it's when our nerves pop up. When we are uncertain or unclear about what it is that we want to say or just really nervous about doing it, like, I think this is our normal human default to go back to beating around the bush. But it definitely, as Steve mentioned, is a skill that we can learn and continue to practice. And it's also really helpful to have somebody there who can hold your feet to the fire and help you in the moment.

    STEVE BURNS: Katie, I'm so glad you mentioned that. I just think about even for us as palliative care physicians, who do serious illness conversations all the time, catching ourselves doing some things because we are being affected by the conversation and our well-being. I remember a couple of weeks ago, how hard it was for me to say dying and death. And I know. I've been teaching my learners say the D word. It's OK. It's direct. It's straightforward. And then all of a sudden, I was in the middle of the conversation and I noticed I was struggling saying death.

    And so again, just to say we are human, that these conversations affect us. And having team support is so helpful in the moment. Because the chaplain who I was with said, what we're saying is we're worried that she's dying. And I was like, oh thank god. She said it.

    TYLER JOHNSON: And the other thing too, right, is that I think it's helpful in a sense to recognize that the difficulty with giving a headline or with saying death or dying or whatever is an impulse borne of human compassion. I mean, it's not because we're bad people. It's because we have good hearts and because short of maybe clergy members, there's really nobody else in the way that human ecosystems are set up that does this, right? It's just a hard thing to do.

    And recognizing that it's hard and recognizing that we ourselves are having a hard time with it, is not some failing of doctoring. I would say that actually, this is one of those weird instances where having that consistent struggle, that should be a tension that should define part of how we doctor. Because if the tension goes away, that's actually more worrisome than if the tension continues to be there, though we have to find productive ways to engage with it.

    STEVE BURNS: Yeah. We did a study in 2016, the Vermont Hospice Study, and similar to actually, what Cambia Health Foundation found, why people don't engage in serious illness conversations. And one of the biggest reasons was taking away hope or hurting people's feelings and in causing emotional distress.

    We also know with the literature that most patients, up to like 90%, 95%, want to know the truth because it helps them better make decisions. And I think we can deliver prognosis in a compassionate way. And I think practicing that in the kind and caring way that's person-centered, asking them, what do you know? Is it all right if we talk about this right now? Delivering in a headline and responding to emotion can help make that a more compassionate conversation. Although it still doesn't take away the human feeling that I'm worried I'm going to hurt someone in this conversation.

    TYLER JOHNSON: Almost always in my experience, patients who have metastatic disease, or for some other reason, disease that is known from the get-go to be incurable, in one of our first discussions, they will ask some version of the question of how long do I have, or what are things going to look like going down the road?

    There's good evidence to demonstrate, and it has also been my personal experience, that we're really bad at answering that question at the time of diagnosis, right? Because we don't know anything about the biology of the tumor, the response of chemotherapy, what the molecular markers are. There's a whole host of things that just make it so we almost always cannot answer the question accurately even if we try.

    And so what I will usually do is I will tell patients, I'll say, when they ask some version of that question, I'll say, look. I need you to know that, first of all, I can't answer that question right now. I'm not obfuscating. It's just, I would be lying if I gave you an answer because we just don't know. But I want to let you know that what is true is that I can usually tell when things are starting to go in the wrong direction.

    And unless you ask me specifically to do otherwise, I promise you, the patient, that as soon as I recognize that things are heading in a direction that I'm concerned about, I will tell you that in so many words so that you understand what I'm talking about. And then we will have a discussion about where to go from there.

    And then, when we get to that point, whether it's six weeks later or six months later, or sometimes six years later, I will say-- because I do this with all my patients-- I'll say, do you remember when I made you that promise way back when or a few months ago, whatever it is? And then I'll say, I hope that I'm wrong here. But I'm concerned that we may now be in that place. And I want to tell you why, and then I want to talk about where to go from there. Because that then situates this difficult discussion in the context of this relationship of trust that we've been building over however long I've known the patient. And I have found that that provides a trusting context within which to have the more difficult conversation that has been really helpful.

    STEVE BURNS: Noticing the time, I'm curious, how does the task of delivering bad news affect your own well-being?

    TYLER JOHNSON: Just to remind people, we said this before, but I just think it's important to recognize that this being a heavy thing is normal. And recognizing that is normal and that it really is-- I mean, there's some degree to which you can do this well and that will lighten the burden to some degree. But you have to make sure that you're filling your own reservoir, right? You can't pour empathy out of an empty reservoir. And so I think you have to make sure that you're filling that in whatever the ways are that you do.

    KATIE STOWERS: I just think I was thinking about that too, Steve. One other thing that I wanted to build off of, this fear and this worry that we bring to these conversations, that I'm going to send them into a tailspin of depression. Or I'm going to take away all of their hope. I think there is the other part of this that I get to see as a palliative care physician, which is the high degrees of distress that often come from not knowing this information, that's really helpful in preparing and planning for the future and almost this sense of relief.

    Even when it's unfavorable, even when it's not what they wanted to hear, there's a relief in knowing and being able to do something with it. So that limbo and uncertainty. the idea that something terrible is out there or they can't prepare for it can be really distressing. And so to some degree, we're helping to heal by being able to move into some planning.

    STEVE BURNS: Yeah, I totally agree that it's such an important thing to minimize the stress of uncertainty. And the other piece that I think about is these are really sacred moments where we can really connect with our patients, share the news, find out how they're doing with it, and then find out what really matters in their lives. I think that really helps be my north star when it comes to continuing the care that I'll provide for them in their families.

    TYLER JOHNSON: Yeah. You know, there's a really harrowing, in some ways, but beautiful moment. And many of you will probably have read the book Just Mercy, which is written by this lawyer who's fighting for justice, particularly racial justice, for people who have been unfairly treated by the justice system in the deep South. And there's this moment towards the end of the book where a person who he had been fighting for who was on death row has just finally been executed. And he goes home and sort of just collapses crying. And then he writes really beautifully about how this moment of sort of shared vulnerability, where he kind of recognized that the reason that this was so hard was because even though he was vulnerable and broken in different ways than the person who had just been executed, it was still sort of a shared sense of vulnerability. It was what made his work hard, but also what made his work beautiful.

    And I think that in a similar fashion, when we have these really difficult discussions, I think that while there is a real moral weight and difficulty to it, there is also just as you said, they also end up being some of the most meaningful, memorable, and beautiful moments.

    STEVE BURNS: As a clinician, what have you learned over the years regarding communication with patients that may help others navigate scenarios where they can deliver serious news? I was just on service with a trainee. The team was delivering serious news. It was serious news around lung cancer. And the team's like, this patient's just not getting it. And we tried to explain it over and over again. And they're not getting it. And then my trainee went in and attempted and said, yes. Here's your diagnosis. We're concerned it's incurable. And you likely will die in the next year or so. And the patient said, no. I'll be fine.

    So we hypothesized before going in the room with me, like, what it would be. And what it came out is maybe it's not they're not understanding it. Maybe it's emotion. So we went back in. And sure enough, my trainee did wonderful and responded to emotion and said. It must be really hard hearing this news. And the patient immediately got sad and said, I'm really scared.

    And we unpacked that a little bit. And when we left the room, he said to me, yeah. That was emotion. He totally gets it. He's just upset. And so I just want to reiterate the idea, sometimes, it's not that they're not understanding it. It's that it's a lot to process. And there's a lot of feelings behind it.

    KATIE STOWERS: Building on that, one of the things that I see happen a lot around emotion is the health system is not set for people to process and to come to terms with these hugely life things and life-altering things. There's not time for people to process what this means for their life to term and process that emotion. And we're constantly pushing. And sometimes it almost could feel like badgering, really trying to get a decision to come where, with some degree of autonomy and some degree of time, allowing them to really process. People, a lot of times, get to where they need to go. But it's a process of really being able to deal with.

    STEVE BURNS: Yeah.

    TYLER JOHNSON: Yeah, the only thing that I will add is that these conversations, when they need to happen, work best when I have been mindful of laying the groundwork for the conversation over the entire arc of the illness. Rather than thinking of, oh, this is the thing that I do right when someone is getting close to dying.

    Because if you've never laid the groundwork and then you try to have the discussion, then when the person is really, really sick and in the hospital or whatever, of course, there's still a better and a worse way to do that. But even the best conversation if it's that isolated incident, in my experience, is nowhere near as good as if we have been transparent and building trust and building a sort of a shared vocabulary with the patient over the course of the illness. So that then, when they get to having to have quote, "the discussion" unquote, it becomes just one part of this longer chain rather than an isolated happening.

    And that really gets to what I was saying earlier about the promise that I make my patients when they first ask that sort of big picture question. That even though I'm not in a good place to talk about it right then, that I promise them that when it comes time, I will talk with them about that with candor. That makes an enormous amount of difference. I know I had a trainee who was with me one time who was a continuity fellow with me and had heard me make that promise to a number of patients and the first time he was with that same patient when it came time to have that discussion.

    And I said, well, you remember that promise that I made the first time I met you? And he could, for the first time, see all of the dots connect over the arc of the illness. It was like, whoa. Like, there's just really this power that comes. But you have to have been building it piece by piece over time.

    STEVE BURNS: I think both of you are highlighting for me two reminders that I want to keep in mind every day when I'm delivering serious news. One is sort of having an agenda but being flexible with my agenda. And I remember during my training, one of my mentors said, keep your agenda out the door. Don't force your agenda on the patient, as Katie mentioned.

    And yet, have a plan and still go in with that plan. The other piece that Tyler, you're reminding me of, is the importance of the arc of the conversation and how continuity. Because we build off of conversations from visit to visit. And yet, sometimes, someone else is taking over for us or they end up in a hospital or they end up in a nursing home. And it reminds me how important documentation is to convey what happened in that encounter. What was said, what was the headline that was shared, how did the patient respond, and then what was the plan. And far too often, we usually just write the results of the conversation.

    TYLER JOHNSON: Yeah. One last thing that I want to put a specific plug in that I have found to be enormously important, I think all of us would agree that amidst all the conversations that we might have as part of taking care of a patient, this is the one where shared decision-making matters the most. And yet, if you ask most people, even experienced doctors, how do you engage in shared decision-making around this kind of question? That's really tricky, right? Because I think what often ends up happening is that we either default to being very prescriptive where we go in and say, well, you should do this or shouldn't do this. Or we default to being waiters with the menu. Like, well. OK, so would you like some intubation on the side of CPR?

    And so, I think that both of those models are equally problematic and that the tool, the specific tool that has helped me really learn about how to do shared decision-making and even provides the specific words, is what's called the Serious Illness Conversation Guide from the Ariadne group at Harvard, which is the group founded by Atul Gawande and his colleagues.

    And I think that that gives a very brief script which, I mean, you can literally almost just read. You can get a little card that you can carry in your pocket or whatever. And it gives-- and the entire conversation in most cases, takes maybe 10 or 12 minutes. But it gives you the point-by-point things to say and really allows you to meaningfully engage in shared decision-making so that you spend the first half of the conversation listening to the patient's priorities and values, and then the last maybe third of the conversation, using that to make meaningful recommendations. And so again, it's called the Serious Illness Conversation Guide. And I would really recommend to listeners that they look it up.

    STEVE BURNS: That's a really great segue to what training and resources are there for clinicians and oncology trainees to improve their communication skills. The three resources that I can think about are Vital Talk, the Serious Illness Conversation Program out of Harvard and Ariadne Labs, and then they have a rich program which is from the American Academy of Communication of Health Care. All three are different ways of approaching communication skills training.

    I always think about the Serious Illness Conversation Programs about raising the floor to make sure that we hit the basics. And then Vital Talk is if you want to flex your muscles or flex your skills when it comes to how do I respond to really intense emotion, or if someone's avoiding the conversation, what do I do? They train with raising the ceiling or their goals to raise the ceiling.

    And Vital Talk actually came out of oncology conversations first with OncoTalk almost 20 years ago. And really thinking about not didactic-based, but practice and skills-based training. And I certainly have found it rewarding and life-changing for me, where I could actually label the things that I do every day, give myself some feedback, and then teach my trainees.

    TYLER JOHNSON: And I will just add, as a medical oncologist who has both taken the Vital Talk course and now is trained and teaching Vital Talk courses, that this is not just for palliative care doctors. And I think that it is particularly-- I mean, you may not have the interest or passion to want to become a Vital Talk trainer, which is understandable if you're a medical oncologist, either a busy practice or a heavy research portfolio.

    But it's just to say that they offer 1 and 2 and various iterations of courses, depending on how intensely you want to study these things. But it's just to say that the skills that they teach are concrete. This is not some sort of head in the clouds theoretical exercise. I mean, they're taught very concrete skills that you can wake up the next morning and employ you in your practice. And that I think to a point that is often counterintuitive to us, I think that we are almost afraid, as oncologists, to know about this because we think, oh my gosh. I didn't have time to engage in these long discussions. There's no way.

    But my experience has actually been what this does at the end, is it actually makes you more efficient. I know that seems counterintuitive, but we spend so much time sort of beating around the bush around this stuff that we actually end up making ourselves take longer. And having really concrete skills for how to have these discussions can actually make your practice more efficient for things that otherwise can really eat up a lot of time.

    KATIE STOWERS: I do a lot of teaching in Vital Talk incentives. It sounds like both of you do as well. But the piece of feedback that I hear from trainees that come take courses-- and I do a lot with oncologists and oncology fellows as well-- is oh, these are the things that I've seen in conversations at work that I never had a name for. Like, you're putting a name on something that I've seen. And maybe I've done a couple of times, but I didn't know that I was doing it this way. And especially for my colleagues who are practicing providers who teach others, they really love having a name and a framework for being able to teach these skills to others.

    It's not some magic fairy dust that you either have or you don't. It's actually, here's a skill that I can pass on to you and you can practice. And I can watch for, and we can have some feedback about. And I have seen that being a really enjoyable part of doing this framework. We have that, right, for almost every other part of medicine. But because communication is something that's so innate and personal, that hasn't always been the case around communication. And so I really love that about Vital Talk, that they've taken these pieces and put names on them.

    Because this is how you give communication clearly, information clearly, is the headline. This is how you show someone that you care about them. These are empathic statements. And that's something that we can use as a third language when we're going into team meetings together or when we're teaching a trainee.

    STEVE BURNS: It's one of the most important skills that we do every day, and probably the most important procedure that we do on a regular basis in all of our fields.

    TYLER JOHNSON: And I think you can tell from the way that the three of us have discussed delivering a headline during this podcast, that this is not like a thing that we learned seven years ago and then just sort of left in a drawer somewhere, right? Like, this is something that we're actively thinking about as we actually take care of patients every day, which is to say that it really is very applicable.

    STEVE BURNS: I feel like that's the time for today. This has been a really great conversation. Thanks so much for both of your insights and participation in this episode of the ASCO Educational Podcast.

    KATIE STOWERS: Thanks for inviting us. It's been great to be here.

    TYLER JOHNSON: Thanks so much. It's been a pleasure.

    [MUSIC PLAYING]

     

    SPEAKER 1: Thank you for listening to the ASCO Education Podcast. To stay up to date with the latest episodes, please click Subscribe. Let us know what you think by leaving a review. For more information, visit the comprehensive education center at Education.ASCO.org.

    SPEAKER 2: The purpose of this podcast is to educate and to inform. This is not a substitute for professional medical care and is not intended for use in the diagnosis or treatment of individual conditions. Guests on this podcast express their own opinions, experience, and conclusions. Guest statements on the podcast do not express the opinions of ASCO. The mention of any product, service, organization, activity, or therapy should not be construed as an ASCO endorsement.

    29: What's in a Scientific Name, How Many Cells are in a Human, and What the British Museum Stole

    29: What's in a Scientific Name, How Many Cells are in a Human, and What the British Museum Stole

    What is the science of scientific naming, and could it actually be life saving?  How many cells are in a human body, and why is it important to know?  And how exactly did the British Museum... "acquire" all these artifacts?

    Watch Tom's PowerPoint Comedy Show!

    Support us with a Max Fun Membership!

    Join our Discord!

    We also learn about: what does tom smell like? naming is hard for computer science, naming is a science, reading 12 million paper titles by hand, single use acronyms, polynomial naming, Ranunculus mother of dragons, the dino hip mixup, smooth transitions, the fermium wars, we all know what happened to element 102, berkelium californium americium, should we name elements after living people, Ella is the only true Swiftie, half of all exoplanets are named Kepler, the old Taylor can’t come to the phone right now, why? she’s a millipede, Ella will get an answer, humans have 1 cell technically, c elegans has exactly 1031 cells, don’t embarrass yourself by saying how many cells are in a mouse, we enter the wheels and doors debate, Ella sperm fact rick rolls us, the number of kinds of cells, tom is bad at math, every time a scientist questions a number an angel gets its wings, Livers Georg, Ella is heartbroken we don’t have a number, what’s the point of counting cells? the British Museum keeps 99% of things in the disney vault, offering a replica of the rosetta stone instead, Britain legally cannot return items without government approval, all the stuff we never knew about Moai statues, what does queen Victoria need with a Moai statue, her majesty declares finders keepers, actualy these stolen things mean as much to Britain now, most Britains want the items returned, there is so much to learn from this!

    Sources:

    Judith Winston's Review of Binomial Nomenclature
    The Growth of Acronyms in the Scientific Literature
    The Long and Short of Abbreviations (UA Medical Acronym)
    Dinosaur Hip Naming Mixup
    How Many Named Species are Valid?
    Review of the Transfermium Wars
    IUPAC 1994 Naming Decision
    Naming Exoplanets
    A Flu by Any Other Name
    Nature on WHO Naming
    Taylor Swift's Millipede

    ---

    Number of Bacteria In Your Body
    Sperm
    Types Of Cells In The Human Body
    An Estimation Of The Number Of Cells In The Human Body

    ---

    Human Remains in the British Museum
    British Museum: Rosetta Stone
    British Museum: Moai of rapa Nui (Easter Island Statues)
    CNN: British Museum Discusses fate of Easter Island Statues
    British Museum: Benin Bronzes
    The Guardian: British museum ‘Has Head in sand’ Over Return of Artefacts
    British Museum: The Parthenon Sculptures
    British Museum: Maqdala Collection
    YouGuv: Should Britain Return Historical Artefacts to Their Country of Origin?
    Culture war: the case against repatriating museum artifacts
    NYT: Investigators, Citing Looting, Have Seized 27 Antiques From the Met
    CNN: Manhattan DA returns 58 antiquities to Italy, including 21 seized from the Metropolitan Museum of Art

    Ep 911 | How Many Kids Should Christians Have? | Q&A

    Ep 911 | How Many Kids Should Christians Have? | Q&A
    Today, we're answering a few of your questions. Is the number of kids a Christian has freedom of conscience, or are we to have many regardless of our desires? Should abortion doctors get the death penalty? Will we see our miscarried babies in heaven and know them? We also cover go-to coffee orders, favorite Bible verses, and looking forward to small things every day. --- Timecodes: (01:17) Is number of kids a Christian has freedom of conscience or are we to have many? (05:40) What are the small things you look forward to every day? (08:45) What is your go-to coffee order? (12:24) Nikki Haley opinions? (14:00) Should abortion doctors get the death penalty? (15:00) What’s your favorite bible verse and why? (21:40) Advice on a gay married coworker who’s going through the surrogate process (24:20) Should I move where my husband wants to move or prioritize my aging parents? (28:04) Will we see our miscarried babies in heaven and know them? (29:57) Do you think they will ever admit the truth about the Hunter Biden laptop? (33:04) Birth control recommendations? --- Today's Sponsors: Brave Books — go to BraveBooks.com and get BRAVE’s newest book free when you subscribe to their Freedom Island Book Club! Use code ALLIE to get a FREE book and 20% off your subscription. Cozy Earth — go to CozyEarth.com/ALLIE and use promo code 'RELATABLE' at checkout to save 35% off your order! Seven Weeks Coffee — Seven Weeks is a pro-life coffee company with a simple mission: DONATE 10% of every sale to pregnancy care centers across America. Get your organically farmed and pesticide-free coffee at sevenweekscoffee.com and let your coffee serve a greater purpose. Use the promo code 'ALLIE' to save 10% off your order. Good Ranchers — get $30 OFF your box today at GoodRanchers.com – make sure to use code 'ALLIE' when you subscribe. You'll also lock in your price for two full years with a subscription to Good Ranchers! --- Links: John Piper: "Why Do You Believe That Infants Who Die Go to Heaven?" https://www.desiringgod.org/interviews/why-do-you-believe-that-infants-who-die-go-to-heaven John MacArthur: "The Salvation of Babies Who Die, Part 1" https://www.gty.org/library/sermons-library/80-242/the-salvation-of-babies-who-die-part-1 --- Relevant Episodes: Ep 519 | President Donald Trump on Witch Hunts, Family + Mean Tweets https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-519-president-donald-trump-on-witch-hunts-family/id1359249098?i=1000541152964 Ep 763 | Governor Ron DeSantis on Trans Kids, DEI, and Fatherhood https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-763-governor-ron-desantis-on-the-lgbtq-lobby-dei/id1359249098?i=1000602371574 Ep 852 | Vivek Ramaswamy: Can a Non-Christian Champion Christian Values? https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-852-vivek-ramaswamy-can-a-non-christian-champion/id1359249098?i=1000623840426 Ep 844 | Is the Pro-Life Movement Fake? | Guest: Bradley Pierce https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-844-is-the-pro-life-movement-fake-guest-bradley-pierce/id1359249098?i=1000622319260 Ep 810 | Detoxifying Your Life: Birth Control, Cleaning Chemicals & Fake Food | Guest: Shawna Holman https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-810-detoxifying-your-life-birth-control-cleaning/id1359249098?i=1000614201869 Ep 254 | Birth Control, IVF & Surrogacy https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/ep-254-birth-control-ivf-surrogacy/id1359249098?i=1000475691301 --- Buy Allie's book, You're Not Enough (& That's Okay): Escaping the Toxic Culture of Self-Love: https://alliebethstuckey.com/book Relatable merchandise – use promo code 'ALLIE10' for a discount: https://shop.blazemedia.com/collections/allie-stuckey Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    140 - Paranormal Tourism and Ethics in the Field with Lacey Reinhardt - Big Seance Podcast

    140 - Paranormal Tourism and Ethics in the Field with Lacey Reinhardt - Big Seance Podcast

    Lacey Reinhardt is the owner and operator of Haunted STL Tours and the Host of the American Spirits Podcast. Patrick and Lacey discuss paranormal tourism, ethics and cultural sensitivity in the paranormal field, “ghost hunter” stereotypes, and so many delicious tangents! Visit BigSeance.com/140 for more info!

    Other Android Options
    Listen in Spotify
    Listen in Stitcher
    Listen in iHeart Radio
    Direct Download Link

     

    In this episode:

    Episode Teaser :00

    Intro 1:02

    Welcome, Lacey Reinhardt! 1:35

    I met Lacey this winter at Troy Taylor’s Dead of Winter Conference! 4:11   

    Lacey has a background in Veterinary Medicine, and working with service animals helped her to realize the power in non-verbal communication. Working with animals led to an interest in the paranormal. 5:50

    From the beginning, Lacey grew up not fitting the mold. 9:00

    Lacey quit her day job to follow her passion! She’s learned how to make connections and ask questions along the way. 11:16

    Paranormal burnout and the business of paranormal investigation. 13:45

    Do hobby paranormal investigators really contribute to the study of the paranormal? 16:50

    Conflicting thoughts about “ghost hunter” stereotypes 17:52

    The problem with declaring evidence and artifacts as paranormal (or not) 19:02

    Paranormal “Edutainment” 23:57

    An interesting conversation about politics and being able to work with folks from all sides of the political spectrum. 27:43

    Lacey has a conspiracy theorist side. 31:15

    Lacey’s philosophy? “Don’t be poopy.” 32:48

    Pet peeves of paranormal tourism (including a lack of ethics and a lack of standardization.) 33:10

    Judging and the rolling of eyes in the paranormal. 39:09

    Lacey has strong opinions on how to communicate with spirits and what not to do. Also, cultural sensitivity in the paranormal field. 41:32

    A tangent on Ego, 23 and Me, and Heritage 49:24

    More on Haunted STL Tours and the American Spirits Podcast. 53:23

    Lacey’s final thoughts 56:40

    Updated information on the American Spirits Podcast and upcoming Haunted STL tours! 57:49

    A special THANK YOU to Patreon supporters at the Super Paranerd and Parlor Guest level! 58:35

    Outro 1:00:06

     

    For more on Lacey Reinhardt

    HauntedSTLtours.com

    Haunted STL Tours on Facebook

    American Spirits Podcast on Facebook

    Twitter: @HauntedSTL

     

    The Big Seance Podcast can be found right here, on Apple PodcastsGoogle PodcastsSpotifyTuneIn RadioStitcher, and iHeart Radio. Please subscribe, submit a rating, or share with a fellow paranerd! Do you have any comments or feedback? Please contact me at Patrick@BigSeance.com. Consider recording your voice feedback directly from your device on my SpeakPipe page! You can also call the show and leave feedback at (775) 583-5563 (or 7755-TELL-ME). I would love to include your voice feedback in a future show. The candles are already lit, so come on in and join the séance!

    Ep. 72 - Removing the Stigma of Nurse Substance Use Disorder

    Ep. 72 - Removing the Stigma of Nurse Substance Use Disorder

    Given the nature of our work, it's no wonder nurses struggling with a substance use disorder are often afraid to seek help.  Alissa and Chelsea share their thoughts and experiences regarding how we can remove the stigma of nurse substance use disorder to pave the way to support and recovery. 

     

    CO-HOSTS

    Alissa Brown, BSN, MSN, RN is a clinical nurse educator from the University of Utah Health. She has been working in the health care industry for almost 12 years, and started her nursing career as a med-surg bedside nurse on an Ortho, Trauma, and Surgical Specialty Unit. It was through that experience in the med-surg unit where she discovered a passion for education, and pursued a master’s degree. She is a lifelong learner, and loves to teach.  Born and raised in Salt Lake City, Utah, she's not all work, and definitely enjoys play! She loves to travel, and tries to plan as many vacations each year as she can with family and friends. Alissa loves to read, listen to podcasts, and geek out to documentaries and crime shows on the weekends. She's a total fair weather fan when it comes to Utes Football, but will cheer in all the right places, or get mad when her husband tells her to during a game. Alissa is looking forward to conversations together on this AMSN podcast!

     

    Chelsea Parker RN, BSN, CMSRN was born and raised in Newport News, Virginia. She attended the University of Virginia and graduated in 2016 with a Bachelor of Science in Nursing. Since then she has pursued geriatric and palliative care nursing and developed a love for general medicine, which is where her foundation for med-surg nursing was built. As a young nurse looking for ways to bridge engagement between generations of nurses, she is excited about what this podcast will mean for AMSN.