#917 - Steven Crowder

Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan had a conversation filled with anecdotes and tangents that covered topics like famous personalities, television shows, and smoking pipes. They discussed memorable moments such as Bill O'Reilly's famous "we'll do it live" meltdown and Moby's claim of having inside information about Donald Trump's connection to the Russians. Throughout their conversation, they shared stories about encounters with celebrities like Moby and Brett Butler. They also touched on their experiences at comedy shows in Canada and their preferences when it comes to pipe smoking. Overall, their conversation was casual, light-hearted, and filled with interesting anecdotes and personal experiences.

Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan engage in a lighthearted conversation filled with jokes and banter about various topics. They discuss strength comparisons between men and women, engage in an arm-wrestling bet, and even try smoking a pipe together. Despite their different political beliefs, they appreciate each other's fairness and intelligence. The conversation highlights the importance of respectful dialogue and finding common ground, even when discussing sensitive or controversial issues. It also emphasizes the value of listening to different perspectives and not making assumptions based on political affiliations. Overall, the takeaway showcases the power of civil conversation and friendship in bridging ideological gaps.

The shift in political climate has allowed voices like Steven Crowder's to be heard more directly. Crowder mentions how he had previously felt muzzled by political correctness and liability concerns during Obama's presidency. However, with the rise of platforms like YouTube and the ability to reach audiences directly, he has gained more visibility and influence. Crowder notes that even those who may not like him personally still recognize the importance of free speech and the ability to express different opinions. This case highlights how the evolving media landscape has given individuals like Crowder a more prominent platform to share their perspectives and challenge mainstream narratives.

Smoking a pipe can be a contemplative art, similar to jujitsu or moving meditation. Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan discuss the relaxing nature of smoking a pipe and how it requires focus and mindfulness. However, Joe Rogan points out that smoking tobacco can also be harmful and addictive. The conversation then shifts to the breeding and behavior of pit bulls, highlighting the importance of responsible dog ownership. They discuss how pit bulls, although bred for protection, can become problematic due to their pain tolerance and aggressive tendencies. They also mention the rescue and adoption of dogs, emphasizing the importance of giving abandoned animals a second chance. Overall, the conversation touches on various topics like politics, cultural shifts, and even Uber ratings, showcasing the diverse range of subjects they cover.

There is a disconnect between the actions of a few individuals and the overall message and intentions of large-scale protests and movements. It is important to recognize that in any gathering, there will always be a few who engage in violent or destructive behavior, but this does not represent the entirety of the group. The conversation between Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder highlights this point, as they discuss protests and marches where only a handful of people acted violently, yet this behavior was often blown out of proportion. It is crucial to avoid generalizing and painting entire movements or groups based on the actions of a few individuals.

When leftists gather, there tends to be a higher likelihood of violence compared to right-wing gatherings. This is evident from various events in history, such as Woodstock and Occupy Wall Street, where reports of violence and crimes were prevalent. It is important to note that this does not mean that all leftists engage in violent behavior, as generalizations are being made for the purpose of discussion. However, it is a concerning trend that needs to be acknowledged and addressed within the left-wing community. It is crucial for individuals on the left to call out and take ownership of such behavior, as it can undermine the principles they stand for and hinder progress.

There is a growing division between the left and right, where each side has a tendency to label the other as extreme. This divide has been amplified by the current political climate, with the left feeling threatened by what they perceive as the worst possible scenario for the right, represented by Donald Trump. The discussion also highlights the importance of recognizing the evolution of political stances, such as Trump being the first president to take office being pro gay marriage. However, the negative behavior and extreme labeling by both sides may lead to more Americans voting against the opposing side in response.

Communication and open dialogue are essential for a healthy society. Joe Rogan expresses concerns about protesters and the stifling of communication, emphasizing the importance of a marketplace of ideas. The conversation touches on controversial topics like Pizzagate and pedophile rings, with both participants acknowledging the existence of such disturbing phenomena. However, they caution against promoting unverified claims and highlight the significance of evidence-based discussions. The discussion also addresses the need to focus on real stories and provable facts rather than getting caught up in sensationalism or promoting divisive narratives. Ultimately, fostering open communication and critical thinking can help us navigate complex issues and build a more informed and united society.

Engaging in conspiracy theories can have dangerous consequences. The conversation between Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan highlights the potential harm caused by spreading misinformation and buying into unfounded beliefs. While they discuss the idea that some conspiracy theories may hold some truth, such as government corruption, they also acknowledge the harmful impact of conspiracy theories like the Sandy Hook shooting denial. They recognize that individuals can be easily swayed by sensationalized ideas, to the point where they deny the existence of tragedies. This conversation serves as a reminder to be critical of the information we consume and to question conspiracy theories before accepting them as reality.

Both Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder have strong opinions about the rules and conduct in fighting. They specifically discuss the issue of hitting someone after the bell in a fight. While Crowder believes there should be an immediate point deduction and more time for recovery, Rogan goes a step further and suggests that hitting someone after the bell should result in disqualification. They also discuss the impressive skills and fighting style of Holly Holm, who showed resilience and came back strong in her fight against Germaine Durandame. Additionally, the conversation touches on the importance of fighters speaking out about the physical and mental challenges they face, as well as the compassion and sportsmanship displayed by fighters like Guy Metzger.

Martial arts like Brazilian Jiu Jitsu offer a unique avenue for individuals to stay competitive and continuously improve their skills, regardless of age or physicality. The conversation between Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder highlights the resilience and dedication of fighters who have endured head trauma and long careers but still have a passion for competition. It also emphasizes the significance of training and having access to high-level gyms like Babaloo's iron gym. Additionally, the discussion touches upon the different levels of talent and competition in various martial arts disciplines, such as wrestling and judo, showcasing the diverse range of skills and techniques within the martial arts world. Overall, martial arts provide a platform for continuous growth, adaptability, and exploration.

Flexibility and diversity are key in any competition or game. Steven Crowder, a high-level athlete, learned the importance of being good at multiple techniques in the sport of jujitsu. While he excelled at takedowns and guard passing, he realized the need to also have skills in working from his back. Joe Rogan emphasized that relying solely on a single strategy may work against weaker opponents but becomes ineffective against stronger ones. The rhythm of jujitsu involves continuous attack and defense until someone taps out. Ultimately, Steven Crowder's journey in jujitsu teaches us the value of adapting and expanding our skills to succeed in any competitive environment.

It is important for individuals in positions of power, such as politicians, to have a basic understanding of global affairs and current events. The conversation between Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder highlights the significance of knowing important details like the name of a city, such as Aleppo. This lack of knowledge can have serious consequences, as it undermines credibility and can lead to poor decision-making. Additionally, the discussion touches on the potential dangers of isolation and the detachment that can come with living in high population areas. It emphasizes the importance of community and the need for individuals to value and support one another, especially in times of crisis.

The character and demographics of cities can change over time due to various factors such as economic shifts and cultural influences. New York City, for example, has seen a transformation where artists and creative individuals are being priced out of certain neighborhoods due to high rent and the influx of wealthier residents. This shift has led to a change in the types of people and businesses present in the city. Additionally, there seems to be a tension between government initiatives aimed at reducing emissions and individual desires for independence and freedom. The discussion highlights the complexities and competing interests involved in urban development and sustainability.

The sharing economy, which includes services like Uber and Airbnb, has faced opposition from certain politicians and unions, particularly on the political left. This opposition is often attributed to the influence of powerful interest groups, such as cabbie unions and hotel unions, who fear the impact of these sharing platforms on their business. Despite the potential benefits of the sharing economy, like providing affordable transportation and accommodations, some politicians seem to prioritize the interests of these unions over the potential advantages for consumers. This raises questions about the true motives and priorities of these politicians, as well as the extent to which they are truly committed to promoting sharing and innovation.

Joe Rogan strongly supports Uber and believes it is a progressive and beneficial technology. He argues that Uber provides convenience and financial opportunities for both riders and drivers. Joe Rogan emphasizes that progress should be embraced and that it is important to prioritize innovative solutions over traditional industries that may be affected. He also expresses concern about politicians like Bernie Sanders who want to regulate or ban Uber, seeing this as a hindrance to progress and individual freedom. Additionally, Joe Rogan touches on the issue of unionization, highlighting that Uber drivers not being unionized could be perceived as both a benefit and a disadvantage. Overall, Joe Rogan's key takeaway is that Uber is a disruptive technology that should be celebrated for its positive impact.

The issue with Uber is not just about taking cabs out of business, but also about the inadequate payment and lack of regulation for drivers. While Uber has claimed that drivers earn more than traditional cab drivers, surveys, strikes, and lawsuits suggest otherwise. Recent calculations based on millions of trips revealed that drivers in some cities earn less than $13.25 per hour after expenses. In addition to this, Uber has faced multiple lawsuits from drivers seeking unpaid overtime wages. The outcome of these lawsuits depends on factors like whether the state is a right to work state or not and if there are established unions in the profession. Overall, the controversy surrounding Uber highlights the need for fair compensation and proper regulation in the gig economy.

The rise of technological advancements and the rapid pace of change pose challenges to regulation and resistance to change. It is crucial to allow market forces to shape industries like ride-sharing (e.g., Uber and Lyft) and home-sharing (e.g., Airbnb) instead of relying on government intervention. By promoting competition and consumer choice, the market can regulate itself more efficiently than government-imposed monopolies. However, it is essential to consider the fair distribution of wealth and power within these industries, especially when it comes to unions and their influence. Union involvement can benefit workers by ensuring fair wages and benefits, but it can also lead to negative consequences, such as the perpetuation of harmful policies like the war on drugs. Balancing the benefits and drawbacks of unions and allowing market forces to operate with minimal regulation is key to creating a more equitable and efficient society.

There is a tendency to focus on the income disparity between CEOs and their employees without considering the larger picture. When discussing the example of the Walmart CEO, it's important to acknowledge that he is responsible for employing millions of people and providing them with a livelihood. While his income may seem high in comparison to individual workers, when divided among the workforce, it amounts to a relatively small contribution per employee. It's crucial to avoid arbitrarily picking numbers and instead look at the value a CEO brings to the company and the services rendered. The focus should be on finding a fair and reasonable assessment of job worth, rather than simply vilifying high incomes.

The debate over CEO salaries and worker wages is complex. Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder discuss how the market determines CEO pay but also acknowledge the concerns of workers who feel underrepresented. They also touch on the influence of unions and the music industry in shaping political discourse. While their conversation veers off into discussing movies and political leanings, the core message is that the issue of income inequality and fair wages requires careful consideration. It is important to strike a balance between rewarding exceptional talent and ensuring that workers are treated fairly and have a voice in the decision-making process.

Both Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan emphasize the importance of objectivity and removing biases when discussing important topics. They acknowledge the need to avoid strong attachment to certain beliefs or ideologies, allowing for open-mindedness and critical thinking. Additionally, they highlight the value of appreciating the art and innovation in various forms, such as automobiles and other creations, without becoming overly attached to material possessions. They also recognize the significance of progress and technological advancements, acknowledging that these developments will continue regardless of personal choices. Overall, the key takeaway revolves around the importance of remaining objective, open-minded, and appreciative of the world around us.

Financial security and success can significantly impact one's overall sense of well-being. Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder discuss the experiences of having money and not having money, highlighting the relief and peace of mind that comes with financial stability. They discuss the stress and struggles of living paycheck to paycheck, where even basic necessities like paying bills become a constant worry. On the other hand, they also acknowledge that having money can alleviate stress and allow for a different level of comfort and freedom. However, they also point out that personal fulfillment and happiness don't necessarily come from material possessions, as demonstrated by individuals who choose to live modestly despite having the means to afford luxury. Ultimately, financial security plays a significant role in one's overall quality of life, but true happiness comes from finding a balance between financial stability and personal fulfillment.

It is important to not be dependent on anyone and to maintain financial independence. Joe Rogan realized the significance of financial stability when he experienced a period of not having to worry about bills. This newfound freedom motivated him to work relentlessly and not rely on others for financial support. Additionally, Rogan emphasized the importance of finding out what one truly believes, rather than clinging to popular ideas for the sake of fitting in. He shared how difficult it is to maintain individuality and personal beliefs in Hollywood, where people often have to audition and conform to gain opportunities. It is crucial to have a framework or prism through which to view the world and make informed decisions based on personal beliefs regarding choice, liberty, and equal outcomes.

People often subscribe to a certain ideology without even realizing it. Whether it's conservatism, leftism, right wingism, or liberalism, our worldview is shaped by the lens through which we see the world. The conversation between Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan highlights the importance of recognizing our own biases and acknowledging that everyone has a leaning towards certain values or ideas. Money doesn't inherently change who we are; it only amplifies our character. Both wealthy and poor individuals can be greedy or generous. When it comes to determining fair wages or voting in self-interest, it's crucial to avoid arbitrary decisions and consider the impact on all individuals involved.

People's success and financial status do not determine their level of greed or lack of empathy. Whether someone is making millions of dollars or earning a modest salary, there will always be individuals who prioritize their own interests over the feelings of others. However, it's crucial to consider how a person's upbringing, treatment, and genetic factors influence their development and personality. Age also plays a role in shaping who we are and how we got to where we are today. It's important to acknowledge that everyone's journey is unique, and factors like injuries or health conditions can impact their path. Ultimately, generosity and expressing love to those we care about can bring personal fulfillment and debunk the notion that keeping one's money for oneself is the key to happiness.

Capitalism can thrive in an optimistic society, where individuals believe they can improve their lives and retire comfortably. It operates on the idea that hard work and personal advancement are possible. On the other hand, collectivism and socialism rely on appealing to people's selfish nature and convincing them that they are disadvantaged, unable to succeed without assistance. This mindset is necessary to sustain collectivist systems. However, it would be beneficial if individuals could adopt a more generous approach, willingly contributing in small ways to help others without negatively affecting themselves. This could involve acts of kindness, charitable donations, social work, or sharing informational resources. Promoting generosity and compassion should be prioritized over the belief that others are trying to exploit and deceive us.

The conversation between Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan highlights the challenges of discussing differing political views. It is evident that finding guests with opposing viewpoints can be difficult, as Crowder mentions their attempts to book left-leaning guests on his show. The discussion also touches on the importance of factual knowledge and understanding when engaging in debates. Crowder emphasizes the need for accurate information and criticizes guests who argue without proper facts. The conversation brings to light the potential pitfalls of heated debates, with Rogan mentioning a particularly painful one they had with Christopher Titus. Overall, this exchange underscores the significance of respectful and well-informed discourse when discussing political topics.

Censorship and silencing dissenting voices is becoming increasingly prevalent in today's society. Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan discuss how certain topics are now off-limits for discussion based on one's race, gender, or background. They argue that anyone should be able to talk about any subject, regardless of their identity, as long as they are open to hearing different perspectives. They highlight the importance of engaging in open and honest conversations, even with those we disagree with, and being willing to change our minds based on new information. Moreover, the discussion also touches upon the complexities surrounding the legalization and pharmaceutical nature of marijuana.

There is ongoing debate about the impact of marijuana on traffic fatalities. While some studies claim that there has been an increase in accidents related to marijuana use since legalization, others argue that the statistics might be misleading. It's important to consider that simply being high at the time of an accident does not necessarily prove that marijuana caused the fatality. It could be that more people are using marijuana, leading to an increased number of incidents, but not necessarily a causal relationship. Additionally, it's crucial to recognize that marijuana has potential health benefits and should be viewed in a similar light as other beneficial substances.

Change is inevitable and resisting it can lead to negative consequences. This conversation between Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder touches on various subjects, but the underlying theme is the fear and resistance towards change. Whether it's the competition between different diets and alternative remedies, the urban farming in Detroit, or the transformation of neighborhoods, change is met with resistance by some. However, both Rogan and Crowder suggest that embracing change and allowing people to pursue positive transformations can lead to better outcomes. They argue that clinging to the past or trying to force change can be counterproductive. Instead, adapting to the ever-changing world is essential for progress and growth.

Understanding the behavior and tendencies of different bear species is crucial for knowing how to react and protect oneself in the wild. Grizzly bears, although aggressive, do not associate humans with food and may be deterred by playing dead. However, a predatory male grizzly bear or a polar bear, which is completely predatory, can pose a serious threat. It is important to remember that animals are not inherently evil, but they can recognize food sources, making it vital to avoid feeding or interacting with bears. Additionally, it is essential to be informed about wildlife issues before being quick to judge or react in outrage.

Unexpected and bizarre things can happen in any situation. Whether it's a discussion about speciesism, a bear attack, or watching a movie, life has a way of throwing curveballs our way. Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan's conversation takes us on a wild and tangential journey, highlighting the absurdities and coincidences of life. From rumors of a bear rape scene in a movie to a man choking on a popcorn kernel during a graphic film, it's clear that reality can sometimes be stranger than fiction. This serves as a reminder to expect the unexpected and embrace the unpredictability that life has to offer.

The movie "The Revenant" was not based on real-life events as many people might assume. The only true part of the story was that a man got mauled by a bear and survived, but everything else was fictionalized for entertainment purposes. The film falsely portrayed the protagonist having a son who was killed, seeking revenge, and enduring a treacherous journey. This revelation highlights the importance of fact-checking and not taking movies at face value. It is crucial to separate fiction from reality. Furthermore, the conversation shifts to the impact of diet on oral health, with the suggestion that natural, unprocessed foods may be better for teeth compared to a diet high in refined carbohydrates and sugary processed foods. The discussion underscores the negative effects of sugar on dental health, with humorous anecdotes about sugar-free gummy bears and the deleterious consequences of additives like Olestra. The conversation also touches upon the role of powerful lobbying groups in promoting certain food products and misleading information. Ultimately, this exchange serves as a reminder to question what we see in movies and to make informed choices about our diets for better overall health.

The conversation highlights the nostalgic connection many people have with sugary cereals from their childhood. Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder reminisce about the various cereals they enjoyed growing up, emphasizing their sugary goodness. However, they also bring attention to the potential negative effects of consuming excessive sugar, questioning the nutritional value of these cereals. The conversation also touches on cultural appropriation and the questionable marketing tactics used by some cereal brands. Overall, this discussion underscores the influence of childhood memories and the impact of marketing strategies on our choices as consumers. It serves as a reminder to be mindful of our food choices and the potential consequences they may have on our health.

Radio is becoming obsolete in today's digital age. The conversation between Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder highlights their lack of interest and engagement with traditional radio. They discuss how radio shows are shifting to online platforms and the challenges they faced when adapting to the new format. Both agree that they rarely listen to radio anymore and view it as a dying market. Their conversation reflects a broader trend in media consumption, where individuals are favoring digital platforms over traditional ones. This takeaway emphasizes the importance of staying updated with current trends and embracing technological advancements to adapt and thrive in the evolving digital landscape.

In short, one big takeaway from this conversation is the importance of not undermining and belittling others in the field of stand-up comedy. Steven Crowder shares his experience of being attacked and discredited by Amy Schumer, who tried to diminish his status as a comedian. Joe Rogan expresses his disagreement with this behavior and highlights that everyone starts as open micers and deserves respect for their journey. The conversation brings attention to the fact that comedy is subjective and personal success can be measured in different ways. It is crucial to support and encourage fellow comedians rather than tearing them down.

Stand-up comedy can often become an identity for comedians, filling a void in their lives. However, not all comedians solely rely on stand-up as their whole identity. Some, like Steven Crowder, use it as a means to explore other avenues, such as acting. The idea of the struggling, unhappy comedian is often exaggerated and romanticized, but it only becomes real once success is achieved. The pride in barely getting by and living in unfavorable conditions is not a true reflection of reality. Furthermore, the overuse of labels like "racist" and "sexist" by the left has caused people to become disillusioned and more open to alternative viewpoints, as seen in the growth of channels like Crowder's. Donald Trump's presidency has exposed the flaws of political correctness, highlighting the need for a more balanced and nuanced approach to discussions.

When things become extreme in one direction, there tends to be a backlash and a balancing out in the opposite direction. This is evident in political biases, where an extreme bias towards the left or right leads to people reacting and moving towards the other side. The example of Lyndon Johnson and Ronald Reagan shows this phenomenon. Johnson's actions during the Vietnam War created so much outrage that it led to an increase in pacifism, while Reagan's chaotic presidency prompted people to arm themselves with information and seek intellectualism. The key here is that extreme positions and actions often result in a counterbalancing effect, as seen in the reactions to these two presidents.

Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder have a heated argument about marijuana and its effects on driving. While Crowder tries to discredit Rogan's points, Rogan brings up tests that have shown people drive better on marijuana than alcohol. Crowder, however, dismisses these tests as anecdotal, even though they provide evidence to support Rogan's argument. The conversation becomes intense as Rogan questions Crowder's inability to accept when he is incorrect. Ultimately, the key takeaway is that even with factual evidence, people may still choose to ignore or dismiss information that contradicts their beliefs, leading to heated debates and an inability to reach a common understanding.

Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder had a debate about the impact of marijuana legalization on traffic fatalities. Joe Rogan argued that there is no clear evidence linking marijuana to an increase in accidents, while Steven Crowder claimed that there are articles suggesting otherwise. Joe Rogan cited AAA stats that showed an increase in the percentage of drivers involved in fatal crashes who recently used marijuana, but he also pointed out that many of them had alcohol in their systems. The debate raised questions about the reliability of sources and the need for comprehensive studies on the effects of marijuana on motor skills. Ultimately, the discussion highlighted the complexity of the issue and the importance of considering multiple factors.

This conversation between Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder highlights the importance of open-mindedness and honest dialogue. Despite their disagreements, it is evident that both individuals are passionate about their perspectives on marijuana. However, the conversation becomes heated and confrontational, derailing from the initial topic. This serves as a reminder that when discussing contentious issues, it is crucial to stay focused and open to different viewpoints. Furthermore, it underscores the need for respectful communication and avoiding personal attacks. By fostering a more constructive and understanding environment, individuals can engage in more meaningful discussions that promote learning and growth.

Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder's debate highlights the importance of relying on evidence and data to support arguments. Joe Rogan emphasizes the value of having someone like his producer Jay who pulls up evidence to support or contradict claims. He presents a study that suggests medical marijuana laws decrease traffic fatalities. However, Steven Crowder questions the validity of the study and argues that other studies may present conflicting findings. The exchange underscores the need to critically evaluate research and consider potential biases. It also demonstrates the significance of having factual information to back up assertions and engage in meaningful discussions. Using evidence-based arguments promotes a more informed and productive dialogue.

The conversation between Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder revolves around the topic of whether drugs can cure diseases. While they specifically mention polio and marijuana curing cancer, they both agree that there are certain conditions and factors that determine the effectiveness of a drug in treating a disease. They also discuss the potential risks and benefits of marijuana use, especially for individuals with mental illnesses. Additionally, they touch upon the impact of sugar consumption on health and healthcare costs. Ultimately, the takeaway is that the conversation highlights the need for a nuanced understanding of the complexities surrounding disease treatment and prevention, as well as the importance of considering individual circumstances and factors.

Meaningful and productive conversations require accountability and evidence-based arguments. This exchange between Steven Crowder and Joe Rogan highlights the importance of presenting reliable sources and being open to challenging one's own beliefs. Crowder suggests that Rogan tends to make arguments without sufficient research or debate experience, while Rogan emphasizes the value of listening to different perspectives and considering evidence. The discussion also touches on the topic of marijuana legalization, showcasing the significance of understanding the impact of information on public perception and decision-making. Ultimately, this exchange serves as a reminder that engaging in fruitful conversations requires intellectual honesty and a willingness to critically evaluate one's own arguments.

Communication and friendship can sometimes become strained when discussing differing views on certain topics. The conversation between Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder highlights how even friends can find themselves in a heated debate, with both parties trying to assert their stance. It is important to approach these discussions with an open mind and willingness to listen to opposing viewpoints, rather than trying to be the one with the upper hand. Furthermore, it is crucial to rely on accurate information and sources when engaging in these debates, as mischaracterizations and absolutes can hinder productive conversations. Ultimately, maintaining respect and understanding is key, even when discussing subjects that may be emotionally charged.

There are valid concerns about the potential negative impact of marijuana on developing brains. While Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder may have differing opinions on the subject, it is important to consider that there is evidence and reports pointing to potential risks for young individuals. Crowder emphasizes the need for an open and honest discussion about the consequences of marijuana, especially for those under the age of 25. Rogan acknowledges that he does not believe marijuana is benign for developing brains, but he also points out that there are other substances and medications that can be equally detrimental. Ultimately, this conversation highlights the need for comprehensive and balanced education regarding the effects of marijuana on different populations.

Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder discussed the potential consequences of drugs and the difficulty in accurately measuring their impact. While Joe believes there are massive consequences that cannot be fully calculated, Steven argues that these consequences can be assessed. They mention various substances, such as ritalin, alcohol, marijuana, and depressants like Quaaludes and OxyContin, which can have significant effects on individuals. They also touch upon the use of drugs as date rape drugs and their impact on powerlifters. Despite their disagreement, both hosts highlight the need for accurate information and open discussion about the effects of drugs, emphasizing the importance of having fun and not taking disagreements too seriously.

Kombucha, a fermented tea drink, can contain more than 1% alcohol by volume and may require an ID for purchase. There are variations of kombucha, such as kombucha beer, which can have stronger alcohol content. Making kombucha at home can be a complex process that involves active cultures of bacteria and yeast, fermenting sugar water, and providing the right conditions for growth. On the other hand, making kefir, a fermented milk drink, is relatively easier and can have significant health benefits due to its high probiotic content. Pharmaceutical grade probiotics are also available, which can be beneficial for digestive issues. Overall, exploring different fermented foods and their benefits can contribute to a healthy lifestyle.

Genetics play a significant role in our mental health and how we respond to certain medications or substances. Steven Crowder discusses his experience with GeneSight testing, which looks at genetic patterns and can determine things like depression, bipolar disorder, and ADHD. He mentions that he has a dopamine shortage, which affects his reward center and his ability to feel joy or pleasure like others do. This shortage can lead to ADHD and may be managed with medication like Adderall. However, both Steven and Joe Rogan agree that ADHD medication is often overprescribed, and it should be reserved for those who genuinely need it. Ultimately, understanding our genetics can help improve the effectiveness and personalization of mental health treatments.

ADHD is a complex and often misunderstood condition. Steven Crowder initially dismissed the idea of having ADHD and believed it was overprescribed. However, after undergoing extensive testing and gene site analysis, he discovered that he did indeed have ADHD. This revelation led to life-changing treatments and a newfound understanding of what "normal" feels like. This conversation with Joe Rogan also highlights the importance of recognizing and accommodating different learning styles in education. The traditional school system, designed for girls, may not be suitable for boys who, for example, thrive in hands-on subjects. This mismatch can lead to frustration, depression, and a lack of success in academic settings. Overall, it is crucial to have a better understanding and support system for individuals with ADHD and to consider alternative educational approaches that cater to diverse learning needs.

Homeschooling can have varying outcomes depending on the level of involvement and intentionality of the parents. The examples discussed illustrate two different approaches to homeschooling. On one hand, there are parents who prioritize social activities, travel, and exposure to different experiences and perspectives. These children end up being well-adjusted and able to interact with adults effectively. On the other hand, there are parents who simply rely on online classes and allow their children to spend excessive time on screens without much structure or engagement. This leads to negative outcomes and potential social and emotional limitations. Ultimately, the success of homeschooling depends on the parents' dedication, effort, and thoughtful approach to their children's education and socialization.

The treatment of Native Americans by Europeans during colonization was complex and often brutal. Native Americans were subjected to mistreatment, intertribal warfare, and the devastating impact of diseases brought by the Europeans. While they were not entirely peaceful, their actions were often driven by years of mistreatment and a desire for justice. The Europeans, armed with advanced technology and domesticated animals, had a significant advantage over the Native Americans, leading to their eventual conquest. However, it is important to recognize the historical context and the role that diseases played in decimating Native American populations. This history serves as a reminder of the complex and painful legacy of colonization.

The conversation highlights the prevalence of misrepresentation and bias in media and public discourse. Joe Rogan and Steven Crowder discuss various instances where labels like "fascist" and "authoritarian" are used inaccurately and selectively based on political agendas. They point out the inconsistency in how Google defines fascism as inherently right-wing, while communism is not attributed as inherently left-wing. This exemplifies the media's role in shaping public perception and reinforcing biases. The conversation suggests a need for a more nuanced understanding of ideologies and a focus on dialogue and open-mindedness rather than silencing opposing views. It is a reminder that blanket labels can lead to oversimplification and hinder meaningful conversations.

Freedom of speech is not universally protected outside of the United States. This conversation highlights incidents in Canada and Quebec where individuals experienced consequences for expressing their opinions. It is argued that such limitations on speech can lead to the suppression of ideas and hinder open discourse. The discussion also touches on instances where the left has been more vocal in silencing opposing views, while the right appears to have fewer instances of this behavior. These examples show the importance of protecting freedom of speech and the potential consequences of limiting it, emphasizing the need for open dialogue and the acceptance of differing opinions.

This conversation highlights the growing intolerance of the progressive left today. The incident discussed, where a woman confronted and harassed an Asian photographer, shows a lack of respect for freedom of the press and a failure to consider the public space in which the incident occurred. The woman's intolerance and insistence on getting her way disregarded the photographer's rights and the importance of his job. Additionally, the exchange sheds light on the unjustified labeling of individuals as oppressors based on their race or background. The photographer's calm and professional demeanor in the face of such intolerance is commendable. This conversation serves as a reminder of the need to promote understanding, respect, and open dialogue, regardless of our differences.