Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Recognizing Physical Progress Amidst Digital InnovationsThough digital advancements often grab headlines, significant progress has been made in the physical world, such as aviation technology, which is essential to acknowledge and appreciate.

      Despite the lack of flying cars and other technological advancements we were promised as children, progress has not come to a standstill. While much innovation has occurred in the digital realm, there have also been significant advancements in the physical world that often go unnoticed. For instance, considering the safety and capabilities of early civilian planes compared to modern ones, it's clear that significant progress has been made in aviation technology. The focus on digital advancements may overshadow physical progress, but it's essential to recognize and appreciate the strides made in various industries. Join Craig Horlbeck, Danny Heifetz, and Danny Kelly on The Ringer Fantasy Football Show for more insightful discussions. And, for hiring needs, use Indeed to connect with candidates faster, and for presentations, Canva Presentations offers AI-powered tools to help create stunning visuals in seconds.

    • The history of flying cars and their pioneersFrom early experiments to mid-century dreams, the history of flying cars showcases the intersection of aviation and automobile industries, with pioneers pushing boundaries to make the flying car a reality.

      The idea of flying cars holds a significant symbolic power representing the gap between innovation in the physical and digital worlds. With roots dating back over a century, the history of flying cars is filled with pioneers like Juan de la Cieva and Waldo Waterman, who experimented with various flying contraptions that could somewhat resemble cars. However, the concept of flying cars was not as clear-cut as it seems today, as both aviation and automobile industries were still in their infancy during that era. The lack of a clear comparison point between cars and flying machines made the concept of a flying car less concrete. Despite the widespread assumption that flying cars don't exist, the history of this technology is rich and complex, filled with starts and stops, and a longing for making the mid-century dream of a flying car a reality in our transportation infrastructure.

    • The 1950s Push for Personal FlightThe 1950s marked a significant era for individualized flying, with veterans and repurposed military technology fueling the rise of personal airplanes. However, the concept of flying cars emerged, offering point-to-point transportation without airports or runways.

      The 1950s saw a significant push towards individualized flying vehicles as part of the broader rise of general aviation. With veterans returning from the war having pilot training and aviation technology from military use being repurposed for commercial use, the idea of personal airplanes became increasingly popular. Cessna even advertised their small planes as "family cars of the air," suggesting that flying could be as common as driving. However, there was a distinct difference between personal airplanes and flying cars. Airplanes required an airport for takeoff and landing, while flying cars aimed for point-to-point transportation without the need for airports or runways. Despite this, the blurred lines between cars and airplanes during this era showcased the innovative spirit and curiosity of the time as people continued to explore the possibilities of personal flight.

    • Factors hindering flying carsRegulation and societal fears around energy use have contributed to the lack of progress in creating mass flying personal vehicle industries

      The dream of flying cars has not come to fruition due to a combination of factors, including regulatory challenges and societal fears around energy use. While regulation has played a role in hindering innovation in this space, it's essential to recognize that regulation is complex and multifaceted. The JSTOR's Hall argument, as presented in his book "Where's My Flying Car?", suggests that societal attitudes towards energy and fear of using it have also contributed to the lack of progress in creating mass flying personal vehicle industries. The history of flying cars is filled with ambition and innovation, but various challenges have prevented it from becoming a reality. Understanding the root causes of these challenges can help us better navigate the path towards future technological advancements.

    • Beyond simplistic narratives of regulatory stagnationRegulatory factors have shaped certain technologies, but it's essential to examine complex realities and acknowledge shifts in understanding innovation in the physical world

      While regulation has played a role in shaping the development of certain technologies, such as aviation, it's important to look beyond simplistic narratives and examine the complex realities of specific cases. For instance, the lack of flying cars and supersonic jets doesn't necessarily mean regulatory stagnation, but rather the outcompeting of individual aviation by commercial aviation due to factors like cost, safety, and reliability. Additionally, technological advancements in the last decade have brought about significant changes in the realm of flying personal vehicles, with investments in technology and business making a story written in 2014 vastly different from one written in 2024. It's crucial to acknowledge these shifts and reassess our understanding of innovation in the physical world.

    • The Electric Flying Aircraft RevolutionElectric flight offers advantages like increased precision, safety, redundancy, ease of maintenance, and is transforming aviation with companies like Pivotal leading the charge in eVTOL aircraft development.

      The pursuit of energy efficiency and sustainability in aviation technology led to significant advancements in battery technologies and electric propulsion systems, which in turn enabled the development of electric flying aircraft. This shift started with the maturation of electric vehicle, drone, and electro-propulsion research around 15 years ago. The benefits of electric flight include increased precision, safety, redundancy, and ease of maintenance. Companies like Pivotal, founded by Marcus Lang, are leading the charge in this electric flying aircraft revolution. Pivotal, which is now run by Ken Kirkland, is working on developing electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) aircraft, aiming to make personal air travel a reality. Despite initial motivations rooted in energy efficiency, the end result is a new era of aviation that offers numerous advantages and is transforming the industry.

    • Joby Aviation's Historical First eVTOL Flight and Commercial AvailabilityJoby Aviation, founded in California, made history with the first manned eVTOL flight in 2017, received investment from Larry Page, and commercially launched their eVTOLs in 2021, requiring no formal pilot training but offering a 2-week bespoke training program.

      Joby Aviation, a California-based company, made history with the first manned, electrical vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) flight, which later moved to Silicon Valley and received investment from Larry Page. Initially, the aircraft lacked redundancies and safety features, requiring years of refinement to meet FAA's 6 Sigma safety level. After decades of development, Joby made their eVTOLs commercially available in 2021, with no formal pilot training required due to Part 103 regulations. Despite this, customers undergo a 2-week bespoke training program. The reporter, who covered the story for over a year and a half, unexpectedly got the opportunity to fly one of these eVTOLs after receiving an investor's recommendation. Despite initial skepticism, the PR team arranged for a 4-day training program and eventual flight, with certain weight and gamer qualifications as prerequisites.

    • From GoldenEye to eVTOL simulator: Surprising gaming skills for flyingGaming experience, though not required, can aid in eVTOL aircraft training due to quick skill acquisition. The simulator experience prepares trainees for the unique feeling of takeoff and transition to wing-borne flight, but the cognitive load is high due to potential life-or-death consequences.

      Even if you don't have a gaming background, you can still learn to fly an eVTOL aircraft, but the cognitive load is high due to the potential life-or-death consequences. During his high school days, the speaker used to play GoldenEye but hadn't been a gamer since. He was surprised when asked about his gaming experience for a flying job since gamers tend to pick up new skills quickly. Despite his skepticism, he was given a chance to train and was amazed by the simulator experience. The Blackfly aircraft takes off like a rocket ship and transitions to wing-borne flight once it reaches around 40 feet. The simulator chair only tilts on one axis to prepare trainees for the feeling of pitching back almost 90 degrees. The speaker initially found flying in a simulated environment fun but experienced VR sickness. The training then shifted to a more rigorous curriculum, teaching proper takeoff, handling in the air, and landing. Although the controls were intuitive, the cognitive load was significant due to the potential danger of falling from the sky. The speaker acknowledged that even checking the battery or gas gauge in a car is a routine task, but the same task in an eVTOL aircraft could mean the difference between life and death.

    • First-hand account of flying a flying carFlying cars offer an intoxicating experience, but safety regulations and careful implementation are crucial to minimize risks and maintain public trust.

      The flying car industry is approaching the integration of flying cars into everyday life with caution due to the potential severe consequences of accidents. This is highlighted in a personal account of flying a flying car for the first time, where the speaker describes feeling terrified and the experience being incredibly different from simulated training. The risks involved are significant, as a small mistake could lead to a crash, resulting in negative publicity and a loss of trust in the technology. The speaker describes the experience as intoxicating once they were safely flying, but emphasizes the importance of safety regulations and careful implementation to ensure the public's trust and safety. Additionally, the flying car, the Blackfly by Pivotal, is restricted from being flown in controlled airspace, near airports, or above a certain altitude to minimize risks.

    • EVTOLs: The Future of Affordable Air Taxi ServicesEVTOL companies like Wisk, Joby, and Archer are focusing on air taxi services, offering quick and affordable transportation, with plans for implementation within the next 5 to 10 years.

      While the pivotal wing copter discussed earlier has limitations for commercial use and is primarily seen as a toy for the wealthy, the emerging eVTOL (electric vertical takeoff and landing) industry, represented by companies like Wisk, Joby, and Archer, is focusing on air taxi services as a more viable and accessible use case. These electric helicopters, which will operate from vertiports and take off and land vertically, aim to offer quick and affordable transportation, eventually even allowing passengers to land inside airport terminals. With production certification already granted to a Chinese company and plans for implementation within the next 5 to 10 years, the future of eVTOLs as a common mode of transportation is promising, but the regulatory landscape and accessibility to all remain open questions.

    • Challenges of Implementing Urban Air TaxisUrban air taxis face challenges in urban areas due to congestion, regulation, volume, and workforce needs. Autonomous flying vehicles offer potential solutions for rural areas like medical transport and commuting.

      The implementation of urban air taxis, or flying cars, faces numerous challenges, including solving complex problems like urban congestion and relaxation of regulations, as well as the volume issue and the need for a large workforce of pilots. However, there is a more plausible use case for rural areas, such as medical transport and commuting. Companies like Wisk are aiming for full autonomy from the start, recognizing the financial and practical challenges of hiring pilots. The integration of autonomous flying vehicles into the commuting landscape would require significant changes to regulations and social norms, as well as the infrastructure to support their operation. Despite the appeal of bypassing ground infrastructure issues, the reality is that introducing these vehicles would not make the sky empty, but rather create new challenges.

    • The Complex Reality of the Flying Car RevolutionDespite skepticism, the potential for transformative inner-city transit through flying cars could yield significant changes within the next few decades.

      The reality of a flying car revolution is complex and multifaceted, with various technological, political, and behavioral factors at play. While some see the potential for transformative inner-city transit through air taxis, others harbor skepticism due to concerns over safety, trust, and practicality. However, history shows that our imagination for what's plausible in aviation may be limited, and the exponential growth of this industry over the last century suggests that the flying car revolution, though currently uncertain, could yield significant changes within the next few decades.

    • Predicting the Future of Flying Cars: Challenges and OpportunitiesCreating a safe and efficient flying car infrastructure is complex due to unique requirements of flying vehicles, raising questions about feasibility and safety of flying buses or larger eVTOLs, and potential opportunities for enabling super commuters to live farther away from workplaces.

      The widespread adoption of flying cars as a new mode of transportation faces significant challenges due to the unique requirements of flying vehicles compared to traditional automobiles. The Wright brothers' cautious approach to predicting the future of aviation technology reflects the complexity of creating a safe and efficient flying car infrastructure. Despite the advancements in electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) technology, it remains difficult to imagine every house having an eVTOL that lifts up into the sky and flies autonomously without creating noise and potential accident issues. Moreover, the concept of flying buses or larger eVTOL vehicles raises questions about their feasibility and safety. Instead, it seems that new transportation technologies may unlock new opportunities for travel, such as enabling super commuters to live farther away from their workplaces while still getting there efficiently. Overall, the future of transportation is exciting, but it requires careful consideration of the unique challenges posed by flying cars.

    • Beyond the convenience of flying carsTechnology may not significantly change commuting experience or emotional flourishing, focus on enhancing overall human experience instead.

      The idea of flying cars as a solution to traffic congestion may not be as transformative as we imagine. Despite the technological advancements, the essence of commuting to work and the experience at the workplace might not change significantly. The speaker suggests that we should look beyond the convenience of getting to work faster and consider the potential for technology to enhance our overall human experience and emotional flourishing. The speaker also mentions that the technology for instantaneous commuting already exists in the form of laptops and remote work. However, it's not accessible to everyone, and even for those it is, it may not lead to significant existential changes. Instead, it may only serve to make the commute faster and the work experience slightly more productive.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    S3E14: An Eye Toward The Future with Sebastian Thrun

    S3E14: An Eye Toward The Future with Sebastian Thrun

    For his final interview of 2020, Steve sits down with someone who's always looking toward the future - Sebastian Thrun, CEO of "flying car company" Kitty Hawk Corporation, and chairman and co-founder of the massive online learning hub Udacity. They talk about the importance of access to education, progress made in the field of self-driving cars, and the future of eVTOL technology (flying cars may come sooner than you think!).

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    Literature Search for your CER with Ed Drower

    Literature Search for your CER with Ed Drower

    When creating your Clinical Evaluation Report or CER, you maybe need to perform a literature search. There is a certain method for that and we wanted to help you to understand it with Ed Drower from CiteMedical Solution

    The post Literature Search for your CER with Ed Drower appeared first on Medical Device made Easy Podcast. Monir El Azzouzi

    The Flying Cars of Digital

    The Flying Cars of Digital

    Happy you stopped by The Man the Mic podcast to check us out. In our 3rd episode we are talking about NFT and the new wave of how things are purchased and setup is amazing, from amazon Whole Foods coming out already in some places that allow your prime account to instantly link to your grocery purchases to the NBA Hot Shot for purchasing all the most amazing highlights as a stock and share almost like a virtual trading card just not in the plastic sleeve and notebook to Bitcoin and Altcoins and all the wave of amazing virtual digital currency.

    Who Protects the Consumer More: Regulation or Reputation?

    Who Protects the Consumer More: Regulation or Reputation?
    How do we protect the consumer from shoddy, fraudulent, or dangerous products and services? There's a long tradition that government must do something, which has led to a proverbial alphabet soup of regulatory bodies: the FDA, CPSC, USDA, and many more. Join Ed and Ron as they explore the legitimate issue of market failure, and also the less recognized government failure.

    How to become a PRRC with TEAM-PRRC (EU MDR & IVDR)

    How to become a PRRC with TEAM-PRRC (EU MDR & IVDR)

    Team-PRRC is invited to this episode to help us understand how to become a PRRC. This is a new role required for Medical Device manufacturers. In this episode, we will also share with you what TEAM-PRRC can do to help you.

    The post How to become a PRRC with TEAM-PRRC (EU MDR & IVDR) appeared first on Medical Device made Easy Podcast. Monir El Azzouzi