Logo
    Search

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    enMay 21, 2024

    Podcast Summary

    • The 1992 NBA Finals: A Turning Point for the Three-Point ShotThe NBA has seen significant changes in strategy and gameplay, with the three-point shot becoming increasingly prevalent due to Michael Jordan's record-breaking performance in the 1992 NBA Finals. Other factors like international players and the decline of traditional centers have also contributed to this transformation.

      The NBA has undergone significant changes in strategy and gameplay over the last few decades, with the rise of the three-point shot being a major catalyst. This transformation began in earnest during the 1992 NBA Finals when Michael Jordan set a record for most three-pointers scored in a single half. This event marked a turning point in basketball, making the three-point shot a viable option for superstars and leading to its increasing prevalence in the game. Other trends, such as the emergence of international players and the decline of traditional center positions, have also contributed to the evolution of the modern NBA. Key figures like Michael Jordan, Alan Iverson, Manu Ginobili, Steph Curry, and Nicole Yochum have played pivotal roles in shaping the game's strategies and paradigms. Kirk Goldsbury's book, Hoop Atlas, provides an insightful exploration of these developments and the impact they have had on the sport.

    • Michael Jordan's Resistance to Three-Point Shots in the 90sHistorical perspectives on basketball strategies can evolve, with the rise of new tactics like corner three-point shooting specialists, challenging and surpassing old beliefs.

      The basketball great, Michael Jordan, held a mentality against excelling at three-point shots during his prime in the early 1990s. This perspective was shaped by his success without the three-point line in his earlier career. The three-point shot was considered a new and unnecessary addition to the game, and there was limited practice and understanding of its potential impact. The evolution of basketball, with the rise of sprawl ball and the specialization of corner three-point shooters, shows how historical perspectives can be challenged and surpassed over time. The invention of the corner three-point shooting specialist, pioneered by players like Bruce Bowen, was a gradual process that didn't gain prominence until the 21st century. Understanding this historical context provides valuable insight into the evolution of basketball strategies and the importance of embracing change.

    • The Corner Three-Point Shot Revolution: A Gradual ProcessThe corner three-point shot revolution began as a defensive strategy by the San Antonio Spurs during the late 1990s lockout and evolved into a game-changing offensive tactic in the mid-2000s.

      The corner three-point shot revolution in basketball was not a sudden development but a gradual process. It began as a defensive strategy by the San Antonio Spurs during the lockout in the late 1990s. The Spurs recognized the power of the corner three on defense before they understood its potential on offense. This defensive shift led to the birth of the corner three revolution. However, the late 1990s and early 2000s were a dark age in NBA history for offensive efficiency. Defenses were physical and skilled, and offenses struggled to keep up. The game was slow, and front offices prioritized strength and defensive power over shooting skill. The introduction of the perimeter touch rule in 2004 and the emergence of teams like the Phoenix Suns with Steve Nash marked a turning point in the modernization of pro basketball, specifically offenses, and the start of a new era of faster and more open play. Alan Iverson, a star of the early 2000s, is an intriguing figure in this context. Despite his peak coinciding with the dark ages of offensive efficiency, his unique style of play challenged the norms of the time and paved the way for future innovations.

    • Revolutionizing Ball Handling and Coolness: Alan Iverson and Eurostep Pioneer Manu GinobiliAlan Iverson revolutionized ball handling and brought coolness to the court, inspiring future perimeter stars. Manu Ginobili pioneered the Eurostep and globalized basketball, influencing LeBron James and Steph Curry's gameplay.

      Alan Iverson and Manu Ginobili, though often overlooked in discussions of basketball greats, were instrumental in shaping the modern game. Iverson revolutionized ball handling and coolness on the court, inspiring future perimeter stars. Ginobili, on the other hand, was a pioneer in several areas, including the Eurostep and the globalization of basketball. His impact on the game extends beyond statistics, as evidenced by the influence he had on players like LeBron James and Steph Curry. Curry's transformation from a skilled shooter to a tactical powerhouse can be traced back to his determination to overcome the challenges posed by the Spurs' defense. Both Iverson and Ginobili left indelible marks on the sport, inspiring new generations of players and expanding the boundaries of what was possible on the basketball court.

    • Revolutionizing Basketball with Innovative PracticesStefan Curry's focus on optimizing practice sessions using technology, like a shot accuracy sensor and clock system, has made him the greatest shooter in NBA history and influenced modern NBA stars.

      Stefan Curry, an iconoclastic figure in basketball, has revolutionized the game through innovative practices and analytical thinking. While less successful in terms of career accolades than some other players, his influence on the sport is significant. One example of his groundbreaking approach is the use of technology to optimize his practice sessions, including a sensor that measures shot accuracy and a clock system to develop moves for creating good shots against larger defenders. This focus on making practice perfect, rather than relying on the adage "practice makes perfect," has been instrumental in Curry's rise to become the greatest shooter in NBA history. The clockwork idea, which involves developing moves based on directions on a clock face, is a central part of Curry's game and has influenced the skills bag of modern NBA stars. Overall, Curry's story highlights the importance of innovation, dedication, and open-mindedness in achieving excellence in any field.

    • From Drive and Dish to Heliocentrism: Evolution of NBA Playing StylesModern NBA stars have revolutionized the game with unique skills and strategies like the drive and dish, which evolved into heliocentrism, keeping the ball in a team's best players' hands for maximum impact.

      The NBA has seen a shift in playing styles over the decades, with modern stars like Kobe Bryant, LeBron James, and Steph Curry revolutionizing the game through their unique skills and strategies. The drive and dish, a move popularized by Manu Ginobili, has evolved into the modern bag of tricks, with players like Jason Tatum and Luca Doncic borrowing from this collection of skills. Another significant development is heliocentrism, a strategy that keeps the ball in the hands of the team's best players, allowing them to distribute as they see fit. Kobe Bryant is considered the godfather of modern heliocentrism, with his high usage seasons and influence on younger players like Donovan Mitchell and Luca Doncic. While this style of play may not align with traditional basketball values, it has led to innovative and entertaining basketball, even if it hasn't always resulted in championships for every player who employs it.

    • Basketball's Predictable Style and Postseason WoesThe ball-dominant, heliocentric style of basketball, while effective for regular season wins, may hinder postseason success due to its predictability. Teams should consider balancing efficiency with greatness to optimize their play for fans.

      The ball-dominant, heliocentric style of basketball, while effective for regular season wins, may sacrifice postseason success due to its predictability. This style makes it easier for opposing coaches to design defenses around one or two key players, as opposed to dynamic systems. However, it doesn't necessarily mean the style is simple or predictable, as top players will still get a lot of shots. The rise of sprawl ball and three-point shots in recent decades has led to debates about whether it makes the game more interesting or boring. The intrusion of financial reasoning into sports, as seen in the book "Moneyball," has changed how basketball values its stars and led to more homogeneity in offensive play. However, baseball's use of data and analytics can serve as a cautionary tale for the NBA and a potential model for optimizing the product for fans. Ultimately, striking a balance between efficiency and greatness is crucial for success in basketball.

    • Changes in NBA gameplay and debates over corner threesThe NBA is evolving with debates over corner threes and potential adjustments to the three-point line or corner three rules, while the role of centers continues to shift in basketball strategies.

      The NBA is undergoing significant changes in its gameplay, with the increase in corner threes becoming a contentious issue. Some believe this trend is making basketball less enjoyable and similar to baseball's three true outcomes (strikeouts, walks, and home runs). To address this, some suggest moving the three-point line or adjusting the corner three to reduce its frequency. This idea is not new, as other basketball leagues have already made such adjustments. The NBA, being the only major league not to do so, should consider making the three-point shot a bit more challenging for more players to increase scoring diversity. Additionally, the role of centers in basketball has undergone significant shifts over the decades, from dominance to near extinction, and back again. The latest MVP winners, such as Nikola Jokic, Joel Embiid, and Giannis Antetokounmpo, represent the evolution of basketball strategies, with big men regaining prominence. Overall, the NBA is constantly evolving, and adjustments to rules and strategies are necessary to maintain the game's excitement and competitiveness.

    • European basketball players outpacing Americans in skill developmentEuropean players are developing versatile skills earlier due to coaching styles and training regimens, giving them an edge in the NBA

      International basketball players, particularly those from Europe, have been outpacing their American counterparts in terms of skill development, especially among big men. This trend is reflected in the increasing number of international players winning MVP awards in the NBA. The reasons for this phenomenon are complex and multifaceted, but some believe it may be due to differences in coaching styles and training regimens in Europe compared to the United States. European players are often encouraged to develop a well-rounded skill set from an early age, including shooting, dribbling, and passing, while American players may focus more on physical development and playing in high-pressure competitive leagues. The result is that European players like Victor Wembanyama are entering the NBA with a level of versatility and skill that was once unheard of for big men. The challenge for American teams and coaches is to figure out how to replicate this success at home and close the gap in skill development between American and international players.

    • NBA Teams Adapt to European Basketball Trends and Focus on DepthSuccessful NBA teams are adapting to European basketball's focus on intensive practice and teamwork, while also prioritizing depth to navigate salary cap restrictions.

      The NBA is constantly evolving, and the most successful teams adapt to the changing trends. European basketball's focus on intensive practice sessions and teamwork has influenced players like Steph Curry, and the era of the do-it-all big man is currently dominant. However, with increasing restrictions on team building due to the salary cap, the ability to build deep rosters has become crucial for success. Teams like the Celtics and Timberwolves, with their long, big players and depth, are leading the way in this new paradigm. The future may hold even more shifts, but for now, depth and adaptability are key.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices