Logo
    Search

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    enMay 14, 2024

    Podcast Summary

    • The Complex Relationship Between Smartphones and Teen Mental HealthA study from Oxford University found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health is similar to eating potatoes, challenging the notion that smartphones are the sole cause of teen mental health issues. However, the rise in teenage anxiety is most pronounced in high-income, English-speaking countries, suggesting other factors may be at play.

      While the relationship between smartphones and mental health, particularly among teenagers, is a topic of much debate, it's important to consider that the issue may be more complex than just the phones being the cause. According to the CDC's Youth Risk Behavior Survey, rates of anxiety and sadness among teenagers, particularly girls, have increased significantly in the last decade. Some attribute this to a more anxious world or accommodative parenting, while others point to the colonization of the youth social experience by smartphones and social media. However, a study from Oxford University found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health is roughly the same as eating potatoes. While this challenges the notion that smartphones are the sole culprit, it's also important to note that the rise in teenage anxiety is most striking in high-income, English-speaking countries. The Gallup World Happiness Report shows that happiness among young people in North America and Western Europe has fallen sharply since 2006, while happiness has risen sharply in Central and Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union. This suggests that there may be other factors at play. In today's episode, we explore these complexities with David Wallace Wells, a bestselling science writer and columnist for The New York Times.

    • The role of smartphones in teen anxiety is complexAcademics argue that changes in mental health measurement and approaches contribute to reported increases in teen anxiety, not just smartphone usage.

      While the global phenomenon of smartphone usage does not seem to explain the rise in teenage anxiety uniformly across countries, it's important to note that measuring mental health has changed over the years. The conventional wisdom among some demographics, particularly well-off, well-educated people, points to smartphones as a major contributor to the teen anxiety crisis. However, this perspective is not shared by many academics and scientists who study this issue. They argue that the way we measure and approach mental health has evolved, leading to potential increases in reported cases of depression and anxiety among teens. Therefore, it's crucial to consider the nuances of this complex issue and the various factors contributing to the perceived crisis.

    • Changes in screening and coding led to increase in reported suicide attemptsNew Jersey study reveals surge in suicide attempts was due to annual depression screenings for girls and new coding practices, not actual increase in self-harm.

      A study from New Jersey revealed that an apparent surge in suicidal behavior in children was largely due to changes in screening recommendations and coding practices. With the implementation of the Affordable Care Act, primary care physicians began screening teenage girls for depression annually, leading to a significant increase in identified cases and referrals for treatment. Additionally, a new way of coding hospital admissions required reporting both the injury and whether it was intentional or accidental. Many hospitals did not fill out the second form, resulting in a substantial rise in reported self-harm admissions. In New Jersey, a clarification in coding led to a larger impact on reported suicide attempts. These changes, when accounted for, eliminated the alarming trend lines seen in the data. While it may seem that changes in diagnosis or coding can be evasive explanations, historical precedents such as the 4000-fold increase in bipolar disorder diagnoses among American teens in the 1990s demonstrate their significance. These shifts in how we identify and process mental health issues can have a profound impact on the way we understand and address mental health trends.

    • Reporting biases and changes in diagnostic standards might explain some mental health trends among teensDespite reported increases in mental health issues among teens, especially girls, some trends may be due to changes in reporting and diagnostic standards. However, suicide rates, particularly for girls, have alarmingly risen, requiring further investigation into underlying cultural causes.

      While there has been an increase in reported mental health issues among teens, particularly girls, it's important to consider reporting biases and changes in diagnostic standards. For instance, the rise in diagnosed bipolar disorder and the use of anti-anxiety and antidepressant drugs for pets can be attributed to increased awareness and confidence in diagnoses and treatments, rather than an actual increase in mental health issues. However, there is a concerning trend in suicide rates, which have more than doubled for American girls aged 10-14, and nearly tripled for older teens. Although the percentage increase is larger for girls, the absolute increase in suicides is greater for boys. This gender convergence is concerning, and it may reflect deeper cultural issues that warrant further investigation.

    • Teen Suicide Rates Rising in English-Speaking CountriesDespite a global increase in mental distress among teens, it's not a universal trend. Cultural and mental health care factors may be contributing to the crisis in English-speaking countries.

      While there is a rising suicide rate among teenagers in the US, this trend is not observed in most countries around the world. This suggests that cultural and mental health care factors may play a significant role in the phenomenon, rather than the use of smartphones being the sole cause. The US, UK, and other English-speaking countries seem to be experiencing a unique mental health crisis. This could be due to their cultural similarities and the influence of mental health discourse and care systems established in these countries. It's important to note that while mental distress may be on the rise in these countries, it's not a global trend. Therefore, it's crucial to consider various cultural and societal factors when examining the causes of the teen mental health crisis in English-speaking countries.

    • Societal and psychological issues in the UK and USBoth the UK and US face societal and psychological challenges, with the UK dealing with economic struggles, political instability, and Brexit aftermath, while the US grapples with a perceived cultural decline and growing acceptance of mental health issues, potentially leading to prevalence inflation and impacting individuals' well-being

      There are complex societal and psychological issues at play in both the US and the UK, with each facing unique challenges. In the UK, there's a sense of cultural decline due to economic struggles, political instability, and the aftermath of Brexit. Meanwhile, in the US, there's a shared narrative of cultural decline that feels more detached from reality. Additionally, there's a growing awareness and acceptance of mental health issues, which some argue could lead to prevalence inflation – over-identifying and medicalizing normal feelings. This trend raises questions about the potential impact on individuals' mental well-being and the long-term effects of various treatments, particularly psychotropic drugs. Overall, it's crucial to consider the potential benefits and risks of these societal and psychological trends.

    • The Complexity of Mental Health and Decreasing Effectiveness of CBTWhile CBT was once seen as a solution for mental health issues, its effectiveness has decreased due to its expansion. Mental illness is complex, and we need to continue researching and finding better ways to address it.

      While cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) was once hailed as a major breakthrough in mental health treatment, its effectiveness has decreased as it's been expanded to more people. Mental illness is complex, and we don't have a good way to take care of everyone in distress. The growth of therapy culture and the medicalization of unhappiness is generally a good thing, but it's not as simple as writing a script or putting someone in a CBT program to solve mental health issues. There's also a concern that talking about mental illness more could potentially make people more depressed by making it part of their identity. However, this is still a topic of ongoing research. Some argue that this is a moral panic, but others, including the speaker, feel that there's a real connection between excessive phone use and negative mental health effects. Ultimately, we need to continue researching and finding better ways to address mental health issues.

    • Smartphone Use and Mental Health Distress: Two DebatesDiscussions revolve around the correlation between excessive smartphone use and mental health distress in teenagers, and potential policies to address the issue, such as banning phones from schools.

      Many people, including the speaker and those who work with young people, have observed negative effects from excessive smartphone use, particularly among teenagers. These effects include mental health distress, addiction, and a sense of being pulled away from the physical world. However, it's important to note that not every teenager who uses a smartphone will experience these negative effects, and the culture as a whole may not be suffering from this phenomenon. Therefore, there are two debates worth having: one about the correlation between smartphone use and mental health distress, and another about potential policies to address the issue. One proposed policy is banning or blocking phones from use in schools. Regardless of the outcome of the first debate, implementing this policy could be a proactive step towards promoting healthier relationships with technology and reducing potential negative effects on young people.

    • Limiting Phone Use in Classrooms: A Potential Solution for Distractions and BullyingRestricting phones in classrooms could enhance students' focus, reduce bullying, and potentially improve academic performance.

      Limiting the use of phones in classrooms could lead to significant benefits for students' learning and emotional well-being. This idea is based on the fact that distractions, such as video games, hip hop music, and heavy metal, were restricted in classrooms in the past, not because they caused harm, but because they were distracting. The same logic applies to phones today. While it may impose some bureaucratic hassle on schools, ensuring phones are kept out of classrooms could help students focus better on their studies. Additionally, research suggests that reducing phone use in schools can lead to a decrease in bullying. David Wallace Wells, the speaker in the podcast, expresses confidence in this approach, and believes it could potentially lead to better academic performance. The podcast also mentions that the speakers will be taking a break for two weeks and will return to their regular publishing schedule.

    Recent Episodes from Plain English with Derek Thompson

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?

    Whatever Happened to Serial Killers?
    In the first five decades of the 20th century, the number of serial killers in the U.S. remained at a very low level. But between the 1950s and 1960s, the number of serial killers tripled. Between the 1960s and 1970s, they tripled again. In the 1980s and 1990s, they kept rising. And then, just as suddenly as the serial killer emerged as an American phenomenon, he (and it really is mostly a he) nearly disappeared. What happened to the American serial killers? And what does this phenomenon say about American society, criminology, and technology? Today's guest is James Alan Fox, the Lipman Family Professor of Criminology, Law, and Public Policy at Northeastern University. The author of 18 books, he has been publishing on this subject since before 1974, the year that the FBI coined the term "serial killer." If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Alan Fox Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate

    The Radical Cultural Shift Behind America's Declining Birth Rate
    We've done several podcasts on America's declining fertility rate, and why South Korea has the lowest birthrate in the world. But we've never done an episode on the subject quite like this one. Today we go deep on the psychology of having children and not having children, and the cultural revolution behind the decline in birthrates in America and the rest of the world. The way we think about dating, marriage, kids, and family is changing radically in a very short period of time. And we are just beginning to reckon with the causes and consequences of that shift. In the new book, 'What Are Children For,' Anastasia Berg and Rachel Wiseman say a new "parenthood ambivalence" is sweeping the world. In today's show, they persuade Derek that this issue is about more than the economic trends he tends to focus on when he discusses this issue. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guests: Anastasia Berg & Rachel Wiseman Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.

    Breathing Is Easy. But We’re Doing It Wrong.
    Today’s episode is about the science of breathing—from the evolution of our sinuses and palate, to the downsides of mouth breathing and the upsides of nasal breathing, to specific breath techniques that you can use to reduce stress and fall asleep fast. Our guest is James Nestor, the author of the bestselling book 'Breath: The New Science of a Lost Art.' If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: James Nestor Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’

    The News Media’s Dangerous Addiction to ‘Fake Facts’
    What do most people not understand about the news media? I would say two things. First: The most important bias in news media is not left or right. It’s a bias toward negativity and catastrophe. Second: That while it would be convenient to blame the news media exclusively for this bad-news bias, the truth is that the audience is just about equally to blame. The news has never had better tools for understanding exactly what gets people to click on stories. That means what people see in the news is more responsive than ever to aggregate audience behavior. If you hate the news, what you are hating is in part a collective reflection in the mirror. If you put these two facts together, you get something like this: The most important bias in the news media is the bias that news makers and news audiences share toward negativity and catastrophe. Jerusalem Demsas, a staff writer at The Atlantic and the host of the podcast Good on Paper, joins to discuss a prominent fake fact in the news — and the psychological and media forces that promote fake facts and catastrophic negativity in the press. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Jerusalem Demsas Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "The Maternal-Mortality Crisis That Didn’t Happen" by Jerusalem Demsas https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2024/05/no-more-women-arent-dying-in-childbirth/678486/ The 2001 paper "Bad Is Stronger Than Good" https://assets.csom.umn.edu/assets/71516.pdf Derek on the complex science of masks and mask mandates https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2023/03/covid-lab-leak-mask-mandates-science-media-information/673263/ Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?

    Microplastics Are Everywhere. How Dangerous Are They?
    Plastic is a life-saving technology. Plastic medical equipment like disposable syringes and IV bags reduce deaths in hospitals. Plastic packaging keeps food fresh longer. Plastic parts in cars make cars lighter, which could make them less deadly in accidents. My bike helmet is plastic. My smoke detector is plastic. Safety gates for babies: plastic. But in the last few months, several studies have demonstrated the astonishing ubiquity of microplastics and the potential danger they pose to our bodies—especially our endocrine and cardiovascular systems. Today’s guest is Philip Landrigan, an epidemiologist and pediatrician, and a professor in the biology department of Boston College. We start with the basics: What is plastic? How does plastic become microplastic or nanoplastic? How do these things get into our bodies? Once they’re in our bodies what do they do? How sure are we that they’re a contributor to disease? What do the latest studies tell us—and what should we ask of future research? Along the way we discuss why plastic recycling doesn’t actually work, the small steps we can take to limit our exposure, and the big steps that governments can take to limit our risk. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Philip Landrigan Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: "Plastics, Fossil Carbon, and the Heart" by Philip J. Landrigan in NEJM https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/NEJMe2400683 "Tiny plastic shards found in human testicles, study says" https://www.cnn.com/2024/05/21/health/microplastics-testicles-study-wellness/index.html Consumer Reports: "The Plastic Chemicals Hiding in Your Food" https://www.consumerreports.org/health/food-contaminants/the-plastic-chemicals-hiding-in-your-food-a7358224781/#:~:text=BEVERAGES,in%20this%20chart Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.

    Why the New NBA Deal Is So Weird. Plus, How Sports Rights Actually Work.
    In an age of cults, sports are the last gasp of the monoculture—the last remnant of the 20th century mainstream still standing. Even so, the new NBA media rights deal is astonishing. At a time when basketball ratings are in steady decline, the NBA is on the verge of signing a $70-plus billion sports rights deal that would grow its annual media rights revenue by almost 3x. How does that make any sense? (Try asking your boss for a tripled raise when your performance declines 2 percent a year and tell us how that goes.) And what does this madness tell us about the state of sports and TV economics in the age of cults and cord-cutting? John Ourand, sports correspondent with Puck News, explains. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: John Ourand Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing

    What America’s Bold New Economic Experiment Is Missing
    The news media is very good at focusing on points of disagreement in our politics. Wherever Democrats and Republicans are butting heads, that's where we reliably find news coverage. When right and left disagree about trans rights, or the immigration border bill, or abortion, or January 6, or the indictments over January 6, you can bet that news coverage will be ample. But journalists like me sometimes have a harder time seeing through the lurid partisanship to focus on where both sides agree. It's these places, these subtle areas of agreements, these points of quiet fusion, where policy is actually made, where things actually happen. I’m offering you that wind up because I think something extraordinary is happening in American economics today. Something deeper than the headlines about lingering inflation. High grocery prices. Prohibitive interest rates. Stalled out housing markets. Quietly, and sometimes not so quietly, a new consensus is building in Washington concerning technology, and trade, and growth. It has three main parts: first, there is a newly aggressive approach to subsidizing the construction of new infrastructure, clean energy, and advanced computer chips that are integral to AI and military; second, there are new tariffs, or new taxes on certain imports, especially from China to protect US companies in these industries; and third, there are restrictions on Chinese technologies in the U.S., like Huawei and TikTok. Subsidies, tariffs, and restrictions are the new rage in Washington. Today’s guest is David Leonhardt, a longtime writer, columnist, and editor at The New York Times who currently runs their morning newsletter, The Morning. he is the author of the book Ours Was the Shining Future. We talk about the history of the old economic consensus, the death of Reaganism, the demise of the free trade standard, the strengths and weaknesses of the new economic consensus, what could go right in this new paradigm, and what could go horribly wrong. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Leonhardt Producer: Devon Baroldi Links: David Leonhardt on neopopulism: https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/19/briefing/centrism-washington-neopopulism.html Greg Ip on the three-legged stool of new industrial policy: https://www.wsj.com/economy/the-u-s-finally-has-a-strategy-to-compete-with-china-will-it-work-ce4ea6cf Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA

    The Five Superstars Who Invented the Modern NBA
    The game of basketball has changed dramatically in the last 40 years. In the early 1990s, Michael Jordan said that 3-point shooting was "something I don’t want to excel at," because he thought it might make him a less effective scorer. 20 years later, 3-point shots have taken over basketball. The NBA has even changed dramatically in the last decade. In the 2010s, it briefly seemed as if sharp-shooting guards would drive the center position out of existence. But the last four MVP awards have all gone to centers. In his new book, ‘Hoop Atlas,’ author Kirk Goldsberry explains how new star players have continually revolutionized the game. Goldsberry traces the evolution of basketball from the midrange mastery of peak Jordan in the 1990s, to the offensive dark ages of the early 2000s, to the rise of sprawl ball and "heliocentrism," and finally to emergence of a new apex predator in the game: the do-it-all big man. Today, we talk about the history of paradigm shifts in basketball strategy and how several key superstars in particular—Michael Jordan, Allen Iverson, Manu Ginóbili, Steph Curry, and Nikola Jokic—have served as tactical entrepreneurs, introducing new plays and skills that transform the way basketball is played. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Kirk Goldsberry Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?

    Are Smartphones Really Driving the Rise in Teenage Depression?
    Today—a closer critical look at the relationship between smartphones and mental health. One of the themes we’ve touched on more than any other on this show is that American teenagers—especially girls—appear to be “engulfed” in historic rates of anxiety and sadness. The numbers are undeniable. The Youth Risk Behavior Survey, which is published by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, showed that from 2011 to 2021, the share of teenage girls who say they experience “persistent feelings of sadness or hopelessness” increased by 50 percent. But there is a fierce debate about why this is happening. The most popular explanation on offer today in the media says: It’s the smartphones, stupid. Teen anxiety increased during a period when smartphones and social media colonized the youth social experience. This is a story I’ve shared on this very show, including with Jonathan Haidt, the author of the new bestselling book 'The Anxious Generation_.'_ But this interpretation is not dogma in scientific circles. In fact, it’s quite hotly debated. In 2019, an Oxford University study titled "The Association Between Adolescent Well-Being and Digital Technology Use" found that the effect size of screen time on reduced mental health was roughly the same as the association with “eating potatoes.” Today, I want to give more space to the argument that it's not just the phones. Our guest is David Wallace-Wells, bestselling science writer and a columnist for The New York Times.  He says something more complicated is happening. In particular, the rise in teen distress seems concentrated in a handful of high-income and often English-speaking countries. So what is it about the interaction between smartphones, social media, and an emerging Anglophonic culture of mental health that seems to be driving this increase in teen distress? If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com. Host: Derek Thompson Guest: David Wallace-Wells Producer: Devon Baroldi Links My original essay on the teen anxiety phenomenon https://www.theatlantic.com/newsletters/archive/2022/04/american-teens-sadness-depression-anxiety/629524/ "Are Smartphones Driving Our Teens to Depression?" by David Wallace-Wells https://www.nytimes.com/2024/05/01/opinion/smartphones-social-media-mental-health-teens.html 'The Anxious Generation,' by Jonathan Haidt https://www.anxiousgeneration.com/book Haidt responds to his critics https://www.afterbabel.com/p/social-media-mental-illness-epidemic Our original episode with Haidt https://www.theringer.com/2022/4/22/23036468/why-are-american-teenagers-so-sad-and-anxious Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?

    Are Flying Cars Finally Here?
    For decades, flying cars have been a symbol of collective disappointment—of a technologically splendid future that was promised but never delivered. Whose fault is that? Gideon Lewis-Kraus, a staff writer at The New Yorker who has spent 18 months researching the history, present, and future of flying car technology, joins the show. We talk about why flying cars don't exist—and why they might be much closer to reality than most people think. If you have questions, observations, or ideas for future episodes, email us at PlainEnglish@Spotify.com.  Host: Derek Thompson Guest: Gideon Lewis-Kraus Producer: Devon Baroldi Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices