Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Companies face ethical concerns but still see revenue growthConsumers may not be as influenced by ethical concerns as assumed, allowing companies to grow despite controversy

      Despite public protests and ethical concerns regarding the use of coyote fur and child labor in the production of their products, companies like Canada Goose and those named in the Amnesty International report continued to experience significant revenue growth. The protests against Canada Goose's use of coyote fur gained widespread attention, but it did not seem to deter consumers from purchasing their products. Similarly, the discovery of child labor in the mining of cobalt used in tech devices and the harsh working conditions at Apple's suppliers did not lead to notable drops in sales for these companies. These findings suggest that consumers may not be as swayed by ethical concerns as some might assume, and that companies can continue to grow despite controversy. However, it's important to note that there are many other factors that influence revenue, and this is just one perspective on the issue.

    • The Complex Issue of Willful Ignorance in Ethical ConsumptionDespite claiming to prioritize ethical consumption, consumers often ignore unethical practices of beloved brands due to willful ignorance, which is a complex issue requiring further exploration.

      Consumers often claim to prioritize ethical consumption, but in practice, they may ignore the unethical practices of the brands they love. This phenomenon, known as willful ignorance, is backed by research. For instance, studies have shown that consumers tend to avoid seeking information about a product's ethics to avoid facing hard truths. Even when consumers express a desire to pay a premium for ethical products, they may not follow through with their intentions when it comes to actual purchases. This disconnect between intentions and actions is a complex issue that requires further exploration. It's important to note that this doesn't make consumers less ethical as a whole, but rather highlights the human tendency to avoid discomfort and uncertainty. To learn more about this topic, check out the "d to c pod" podcast, specifically episode 318 featuring consumer psychologist Daniel Zane.

    • Impact of Ethical Information on Shopping DecisionsPeople use readily available ethical information to change purchasing behavior, but may forget negative ethical info, emphasizing the importance of transparency for businesses and informed decision-making for consumers.

      Consumers' shopping decisions are influenced by ethical information presented at the point of purchase. While people may willingly ignore unethical news about their favorite brands, they do use ethical information to change their purchasing behavior when it's readily available. Research also suggests that consumers might actively forget negative ethical information about products, employing a motivated memory strategy. In a study, participants were asked to review information about different brands, including their ethical practices, and were later tested on their recall. The findings showed that participants were more likely to forget negative ethical information than equivalent positive information. This research sheds light on the importance of transparency in ethical practices for businesses and the role of consumers in making informed purchasing decisions.

    • Negative ethical info harder to remember than positiveConsumers forget negative ethical info 20% more often than positive, potentially leading to unintended ethical consequences.

      Consumers have a harder time remembering negative ethical information about products compared to positive ethical information. This was observed in studies where participants were asked to recall or recognize ethical attributes of brands. The drop-off in recall was significant, with consumers being up to 20% less likely to remember negative ethical attributes compared to positive ones. Additionally, participants sometimes misremembered negative ethical information as positive. For instance, a brand that was described as using child labor was remembered as using fair labor. This is concerning because the memory gap between negative and positive ethical information can impact consumer decision-making and potentially lead to unintended ethical consequences. For example, a consumer might unknowingly purchase a product made with child labor because they forgot that the brand had been associated with this unethical practice. This phenomenon was observed across various product categories and ethical attributes, highlighting its widespread impact.

    • Reminding consumers about ethical attributesMaking consumers aware of ethical attributes at every stage boosts sales and revenue for ethical businesses

      Consumers are more likely to forget unethical information related to products, and this forgetfulness is not viewed as morally wrong by them. Companies trying to sell ethical products should therefore make a conscious effort to remind consumers about these ethical attributes at every point of the customer decision journey. This not only helps consumers remember the ethical attributes but also leads to higher revenues for ethical businesses. For instance, a study found that products with sustainability messages had 6.4% higher revenues than those without them. However, this effect is only observed when consumers are exposed to the ethical practices at the point of sale. Therefore, companies need to make a conscious effort to showcase their ethical practices prominently to consumers.

    • Willful Ignorance and Social Consequences of Ethical Consumer BehaviorIgnoring ethical considerations in purchases can negatively impact consumers' perception of ethical consumers and potentially lead to social backlash, emphasizing the importance of transparency and ethical practices for businesses.

      Consumers' behavior towards ethical purchasing can have social implications. In a study, marketing professor Danny Zayn explored the concept of willful ignorance, where consumers deliberately ignore ethical information when making purchases. He further examined the social consequences of such behavior. Participants were asked to make a hypothetical purchase while ignoring ethical information. Later, they were told about another consumer who considered ethical information. The results showed that participants' perception of the ethical consumer was not positive but rather, they viewed the ethical consumer as more ethical than themselves. This research highlights the potential for social backlash against consumers who ignore ethical considerations, which could impact their relationships and reputation. On a business level, this underscores the importance of transparency and ethical practices as a means to build customer loyalty and positive brand image. For more information, visit hubspot.com/service to enhance your customer support and create a better experience for your customers.

    • People's perceptions of those who prioritize ethics can be negativeIndividuals who ignore ethical info may view ethically-minded consumers negatively, leading to less support for ethical initiatives

      People who consciously ignore ethical information when making purchasing decisions may view and judge those who actively seek out such information negatively. This negative perception can lead to feelings of threat and inadequacy, causing the individual to denigrate the ethical other and even conclude that they themselves don't care about the underlying ethical issue. This spiraling effect can result in less engagement and support for ethical initiatives in the future. The findings suggest that individuals' comparisons and self-perceptions play a significant role in their attitudes towards ethics in consumer behavior.

    • Finding common ground before discussing ethicsApproach ethical discussions with positivity and inclusivity to create a receptive environment, focusing on shared interests and progress made towards ethical practices.

      Approaching ethical discussions with a heavy-handed approach can lead to defensiveness and denigration from others. Instead, it's important to find common ground and bond over shared enjoyments before delving into ethical considerations. This can help create a more receptive environment for ethical discussions. For example, rather than criticizing a brand's unethical practices, focusing on the positive aspects and the progress they've made towards ethical practices can be more effective in changing opinions. This applies to various situations, including personal interactions and media communication. It's a delicate balance, but with care and savviness, ethical discussions can be more productive and successful. Additionally, it's important to recognize that changing someone's mind is a challenging task, and people tend to defend their beliefs and ignore information that contradicts their intended actions. However, by using a positive and inclusive approach, we can create opportunities for meaningful conversations and ethical progress.

    • Highlighting ethical attributes at the point of saleEmphasizing ethical attributes during sales can help customers remember and value them, potentially increasing sales. Finding common ground during contentious situations can make opposing parties more open to changing their views.

      Highlighting the ethical attributes of a product at the point of sale can help customers remember and value those attributes, potentially leading to increased sales. Additionally, finding common ground with those holding opposing beliefs can make them more open to changing their views. During contentious situations, focusing on shared values can be more effective than dwelling on differences. I'd like to express my gratitude to Danny Zane for sharing his research on this topic during today's episode. If you're interested in learning more, check out his website, linked in the show notes. For those who enjoyed today's discussion, I recommend listening to our previous episode, titled "The Hypnotizing Effect of Valentine's Day," where we explore how special days can influence spending habits and persuasive tactics. As always, your support in leaving a review, subscribing to the newsletter, and sharing this episode with others is greatly appreciated. Thanks for tuning in, and I look forward to bringing you another insightful episode of Nudge next week.

    Recent Episodes from Nudge

    How adverts use psychology to win you over

    How adverts use psychology to win you over
    In the 5 years I’ve spent creating this show, I’ve learnt a lot about advertising. Today, I share six evidence-based principles that are proven to improve any ad. If you want to understand why you buy the things you buy, then tune in. Join the free Science of Persuasion Course: https://nudge.ck.page/persuasion-course
    Nudge
    enJune 24, 2024

    How to win any argument (according to a neuroscientist)

    How to win any argument (according to a neuroscientist)
    I guarantee that the words you use to win arguments are ineffective. I don’t think you’re a lousy persuader, I think we all are. Today, world-leading neuroscientist Tali Sharot shares her decade-long research into persuasion. She tells me that the way I argue is ineffective and reveals how to win any argument.  Access the bonus episode: https://nudge.ck.page/de30a8ac24 Tali’s book, Look Again: https://tinyurl.com/5n8p3btb Tali’s lab: https://affectivebrain.com/?page_id=161 Sign up to my newsletter: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/mailing-list
    Nudge
    enJune 17, 2024

    10 psychological tactics to write better emails

    10 psychological tactics to write better emails
    I’ve tested 100s of psychological tactics on my email subscribers. Today, I reveal the 10 tactics that actually work.  Join the free Science of Persuasion Course: https://nudge.ck.page/persuasion-course My endowment test: https://tinyurl.com/bv2umtup My scarcity nudge: https://tinyurl.com/376stytp My loss aversion nudge: https://tinyurl.com/5hyh9y4h My experiment with International Podcast Day: https://im.ge/i/PrV4l9 My consistency experiment: https://bit.ly/3sABZTU My curiosity gap experiment: https://bit.ly/3DiGasA
    Nudge
    enJune 10, 2024

    How 22,000 were persuaded to clean sewage

    How 22,000 were persuaded to clean sewage
    This is surely the most persuasive message on earth? It made 22,000 Brits agreed to 1,000 hours of community service, including, but not limited to; cleaning toilets at festivals, scraping chewing gum off the streets, and manually relieving sewer blockages. In today’s episode, Harvard Professor Todd Rodgers explains how.  Access the bonus episode here: https://nudge.ck.page/b64397a286 Writing for Busy Readers book: https://writingforbusyreaders.com/ Sign up for the Nudge Newsletter: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/mailing-list How 22,000 agreed to 1,000 hours of community service: https://tinyurl.com/y9znsvhn
    Nudge
    enJune 03, 2024

    The persuasive power of profanity

    The persuasive power of profanity
    Warning. This episode contains explicit language.  In 2018, KFC told the world they FCK’d up. Today on Nudge, Professor Moore shares the science behind swearing and reveals if swearing in ads helps or hinders a brand. Access the bonus episode here: https://nudge.ck.page/e1bed9bc16 Sign up for the Nudge Newsletter: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/mailing-list
    Nudge
    enMay 27, 2024

    The speech that put a man on the moon

    The speech that put a man on the moon
    It seems inevitable to us now that someone would eventually land on the moon. But back in 1962 that wasn’t so certain. With the ever-rising costs of the Apollo space program, and a huge amount of tax needed from each US citizen, JFK struggled to convince people. That was until one speech on a sunny day in September. This speech went down in history, persuading the nation to reach for the moon. In today’s Nudge, I explain the psychological tactics Kennedy used to make that speech so compelling. Sign up to my newsletter: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/mailing-list Tali Sharot’s book The Influential Mind: https://tinyurl.com/ytvpyuk2
    Nudge
    enMay 20, 2024

    “Don’t be fooled by this sales trick” Chris Voss

    “Don’t be fooled by this sales trick” Chris Voss
    Chris Voss, the FBI’s former chief hostage and kidnapping negotiator, shares how to succeed in any negotiation. Chris’s newsletter: https://www.blackswanltd.com/the-edge Chris’s book: https://www.blackswanltd.com/never-split-the-difference Follow the Nudge newsletter: https://nudge.ck.page/profile
    Nudge
    enMay 13, 2024

    10 pricing tips from 10 pricing experts

    10 pricing tips from 10 pricing experts
    In the 5 years I’ve run Nudge, I’ve interviewed 10 experts on pricing. These aren’t run-of-the-mill LinkedIn gurus. They’re peer-reviewed researchers from some of the world’s most prestigious universities. Today, I reveal their top 10 pricing tips. Join the free Science of Persuasion Course: https://nudge.ck.page/persuasion-course

    “It's How McDonald’s Make Men Binge” Rory Sutherland

    “It's How McDonald’s Make Men Binge” Rory Sutherland
    In today’s episode of Nudge, Rory Sutherland explains: When to tell smokers to quit smoking  How to double McDonald’s orders  Ways to make Londoners recycle  Why pensions schemes are broken  How to make high earners pay more tax You won’t want to miss this.  (Warning this episode contains explicit language). Rory’s book Alchemy: http://tinyurl.com/3ucjy6rz Sign up to the Nudge Newsletter: https://www.nudgepodcast.com/mailing-list

    Related Episodes

    How to save the world, in three easy steps.

    How to save the world, in three easy steps.

    Dr. Robert Malone is the inventor of mRNA Vaccine technology. 
    Mr. Steve Kirsch is a serial entrepreneur who has been researching adverse reactions to COVID vaccines. 
    Dr. Bret Weinstein is an evolutionary biologist. 
    Bret talks to Robert and Steve about the pandemic, treatment and the COVID vaccines. 

    Steve's paper on COVID vaccine reactions: https://trialsitenews.com/should-you-get-vaccinated/ 

    Steve's Twitter: @stkirsch 
    COVID-19 Early Treatment Fund: https://www.treatearly.org/team/steve-kirsch 
    Dr. Malone's website: https://www.rwmalonemd.com/mrna-vaccine-inventor 
    Robert's LinkedIn profile: https://www.linkedin.com/in/rwmalonemd 
    Robert's Twitter: @RWMaloneMD 

    --- 

    Find Bret Weinstein on Twitter: @BretWeinstein, and on Patreon. 

    Please subscribe to this channel for more long form content like this, and subscribe to the clips channel @DarkHorse Podcast Clips for short clips of all our podcasts. 

    Theme Music: Thank you to Martin Molin of Wintergatan for providing us the rights to use their excellent music. 

    Support the show

    4 Leadership Struggles I Had to Overcome

    4 Leadership Struggles I Had to Overcome

    Lonely Leadership

    What are leadership struggles? Many leaders act as if the point they’ve reached in their careers was easy to reach. From my perspective, as I progressed throughout my career, I ran into many different struggles. These struggles are some that I believe every leader will encounter. Rather than hiding these struggles from you, I will be putting them out in the sunlight for all of you to see. I have come to realize that all leaders are alike. As much as we think we are different, we are not as unique as we think. We all share the same struggles. On today’s show, I will be discussing the various struggles all leaders face and how to counteract them.

    The first leadership struggle I’ve encountered is lonely leadership. As you progress through an organization it gets harder to find people that understand you. Great leaders are told that transparency is a must. Be transparent. Share things with others around you. While transparency holds importance, is it always the answer? Transparency is only important to a point. There are some things you should not be transparent about.

    You should never be transparent about your self-doubt. Being open about your struggles with employees can cause them concern about your organization. Secondly, never be transparent about your opinion of others. Especially key stakeholders. They will find out. My philosophy is to never burn a bridge no matter what. This decision has come back to benefit me throughout my career.

    Thirdly, never be transparent about confidential information shared with you. I’ve seen may promising leaders sidelined because of issues of integrity and trust. Building a reputation of integrity as a leader is crucial. It can be lost in just one decision. Don’t make that mistake. This will shatter your career. Being a leader is lonely. Who can you share things with? Your spouse? Not always. I remember when I was at Teligent and we were the hottest new thing. We were on the cover of Business Week, Forbes, WSJ, NY Times etc. My wife was at her hairdresser one day, and the hairdresser was drilling her about information on Teligent. He assumed she had access to confidential information and was getting aggressive. After that, me and my wife came to an agreement to protect her. I do not share any confidential information with her. Never. She doesn’t want to be in that position.

    Is there anyone you can be transparent with? Your coach or mentor. Let your board/shareholders know that you have a coach or mentor. If you’re going to share confidential information with someone, they should sign a non-disclosure agreement. All of this said, you will be lonely as a leader. It comes with the position. Do you have someone that you can be transparent with?

     

     

    What Got You Here Won’t Keep You Here

    Will the skills that helped you reach your position keep you there? These things will not keep you here or progress you in your career. Look at me for instance. My specialty is technical work. I have not touched technical work in 15 years. I had to learn new skills in order to advance. How did I learn those different skills? Right out of college, I was told by my mentor Bob that in order to find success, I had to broaden my playing fields. I knew my specialty very well, but I needed to have a variety of experiences. What did I do? I rotated in marketing, sales, finance, IT, etc. I did everything. While these experiences broadened my knowledge, it wasn’t enough. What were the skillsets that brought me to success?

    • Organization design - How do you structure a team? You have to be willing to adjust in order to create a successful organizational structure.
    • People Reading - Each person is unique and you have to commit to learning them.
    • Consensus BuildingLearn the individuals and their objectives. I do one on one calls with each member of my board before meetings. This helps me to get a better grasp on the thoughts and feelings of each member.
    • Objective Setting – How do you set good objectives? use OKR’s/make sure they are clear and measurable. Grant autonomy letting your experts use their skills to achieve ultimate success.

     

    Consequences of Ideas and Statements

    Ideas and statements made as a leader have consequences. Things will get taken out of context and all the sudden they become the “new law”. When I was CEO at Cable Labs, I told my team that the most common statement they would hear was “Phil said”. In many cases what I said was misinterpreted or misused. The best proof point of this in my career is press coverage. If you google my name and read the articles on the first 16 pages of google, not a single article got the situation 100% correct. At Cable Labs, we had issues with the press pushing out false information. This caused employees to start worrying about the longevity of our Colorado office. I had to call a meeting with my all my employees to address this issue. I made a commitment to my staff that day that they would hear from me first, and not the press. In fact, this created a new culture at Cable Labs called the “no surprise rule” to constantly remind my employees of this. Why do I do this? Because ideas and statements can be a disaster. You need to be hyper-vigilant about what you say, how you say it, and how you operate. Are you conveying statements the right way?

     

    Creative Self-Doubt

    What is the number one skill leaders are expected to have? Creativity/ ingenuity leading to product, service, and operational innovation. Many leaders get promoted to a leadership role because of innovation they are credited with. Look at Nobel Laureates. There is a trend of peaks seen from the recipients of Nobel awards. One in their mid-twenties and one in their mid-fifties. The question comes down to this. Do you still have your creativity?

     

    What type of innovator are you?

    Conceptual Innovators - “Think outside the box,” challenging conventional wisdom and suddenly coming up with new ideas. Conceptual innovators tend to peak early in their careers.

     

    Experimental Innovators - Accumulate knowledge through their careers and find groundbreaking ways to analyze, interpret and synthesize that information into new ways of understanding. The long periods of trial and error required for important experimental innovations make them tend to occur late in a Nobel laureate’s career. Success comes from recognizing that as an innovator we need to shift from the conceptual to the experimental.

    Let’s connect; I am on LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter. If we do connect, drop me a note and let me know. The email address is feedback@philmckinney.com or you can go to PhilMcKinney.com and drop me a note there. If you are looking for innovation support go to TheInnovators.Network or want to be challenged to develop the next big idea, check out our Disruptive Ideation Workshops. Don’t forget to join our Innovators Community to enjoy more conversations around innovation.

    Toni Townes-Whitley (Microsoft) - The Ethics of Innovation

    Toni Townes-Whitley (Microsoft) - The Ethics of Innovation
    How often do entrepreneurs and corporate leaders think about issues like fairness, accessibility or unseen biases in the technologies they invent and advance? That’s the challenge for companies leading the digital transformation that’s disrupting every aspect of society, says Toni Townes-Whitley, Corporate Vice President of Worldwide Public Sector and Industry at Microsoft, in this talk about innovating strategically and responsibly.

    Episode #31 Comprendre les consommateurs de l’ultra-prestige chez Pernod Ricard - Interview avec Marie Dupré Slioussarenko

    Episode #31 Comprendre les consommateurs de l’ultra-prestige chez Pernod Ricard - Interview avec Marie Dupré Slioussarenko

    Nous vous emmenons dans l’univers des alcools ultra-prestiges au travers d’une interview avec Marie Dupré Slioussarenko, Head of Consumer Insights & Marketing Effectiveness pour la marque de Cognac Martell, chez Pernod Ricard.

    Nous échangeons sur la façon dont les études de Social Media Intelligence lui permettent d’explorer des domaines complémentaires à ce qu’offrent les études traditionnelles. Elle nous dévoile, avec conviction, pourquoi les marques ultra-prestiges ont beaucoup à apprendre de ce que les consommateurs expriment spontanément sur les médias sociaux.

    Nous revenons également sur son engagement à rendre les insights clairs et actionnables, pour tous les intervenants au sein de l’écosystème de la marque : les équipes Marketing ou encore les collaborateurs en R&D.

    Pour aller plus loin, écrivez-nous à vibrations@dynvibe.com.

    Si ce podcast vous plaît et que vous souhaitez nous soutenir, n'hésitez pas à le noter 5 étoiles et à laisser un commentaire sur la plateforme d’écoute de votre choix.

    Nous vous souhaitons une bonne écoute !

    Vibrations by Dynvibe est un podcast produit par le studio Encore Encore, réalisé par Chloé Wibaux et Capucine Lebot, sur une idée originale de l’équipe Dynvibe.