Podcast Summary
Staying Informed and Prepared: Economic Inflation, Election Interference, and Gold Savings: Be informed about economic inflation, protect savings with gold, and prepare for potential election interference. Stay healthy with Brick House Nutrition and secure your finances with Birch Gold Group.
The discussion on the show touched upon various important topics, including economic inflation, the importance of diversifying savings with gold, and the potential for election interference. Dan Vongino, the host, emphasized the significance of being informed and prepared in the face of these issues. He also highlighted the sponsors Brick House Nutrition and Birch Gold Group, promoting their products as solutions for health and financial security, respectively. The show featured guest Mike Benz, who has previously warned about election interference on social media and other platforms. Overall, the message conveyed was one of staying informed, taking action to protect oneself, and being prepared for potential challenges.
The Influence of the Foreign Policy Establishment (Blob) on US Politics: The 'Blob', a powerful group of US government agencies and private entities, shapes foreign policy through resource exploitation and political control abroad, but their interests often conflict with those of the American people, leading to a divide and altered electoral politics.
The "blob" refers to the foreign policy establishment in the United States, which includes government agencies like the State Department, Defense Department, and intelligence community, as well as private sector entities like oil and gas companies. This group, often referred to as the managers of the American Empire, has significant influence over foreign policy and is responsible for exploiting resources and controlling political systems abroad. The inner sphere of the blob consists of these government agencies, while the outer rim includes donors and drafters who benefit from the blob's activities. However, there is a growing divide between the economic interests of the foreign policy establishment and the citizens of the homeland, leading to an occupation-like situation where the empire managers are preventing the citizens from implementing different policies. The blob's influence extends beyond the United States and alters electoral politics in various ways.
The Political Establishment: A Bipartisan Issue: The political establishment, a complex web of interconnected relationships between lobbyists, retired military officials, and intelligence communities, shapes policies and grooms politicians, with both parties participating. Trump's defiance challenges this system, as seen in his handling of Mitt Romney and Hunter Biden.
The political establishment, often referred to as the "blob," is a bipartisan issue. Both Democrats and Republicans have been part of this complex web of interconnected relationships, which includes lobbyists, retired military officials, and intelligence communities. These relationships help groom politicians and shape their policies. Trump poses a threat to this system as he doesn't need their support, as seen in the examples of Mitt Romney and Hunter Biden. The CIA's involvement in politics through organizations like the International Republican Institute and the National Democratic Institute is a long-standing tradition that has existed since the Truman administration. Robert Kagan, husband of Victoria Nuland, further emphasized the importance of respecting the blob in a Brookings article before the 2020 election. This bipartisan consensus on farm policy and foreign relations is a significant issue that goes beyond party lines. Trump's defiance of this system poses a threat to the established order and challenges the traditional ways of politics.
The 'Blob' advised both Biden and Trump on potential investigations: The intelligence community, or 'Blob', influenced U.S. foreign policy, but during the Trump presidency, investigations and prosecutions replaced the press in checking power due to perceived mercenary behavior and foreign policy interference.
During the 2020 election, a figure known as the "blob" offered advice to both Joe Biden and Donald Trump, urging them to prepare for potential investigations if they were to win office. The "blob," which refers to the deep state or the intelligence community, had a significant influence on U.S. foreign policy, with both Democratic and Republican parties receiving benefits from organizations like the National Democratic Institute and the International Republican Institute. However, when a populist candidate like Donald Trump disrupted the traditional political order, the role of the press in checking power was replaced by investigations and prosecutions. Despite Trump's relatively mainstream Republican agenda during his first term, the objections to him centered around perceived mercenary behavior and interference in foreign policy matters where there was a bipartisan consensus and potential for profit.
U.S. foreign policy shift disrupts investments in Ukraine: The Obama administration's plan to privatize Ukraine's gas market and expand NATO led to significant investments in military operations and energy sector. Trump's neutral stance with Russia disrupted these investments, causing billions in losses for multinational corporations like Chevron, Exxon, Shell, and Halliburton.
During the Obama administration, there was a plan to privatize the Ukrainian gas market and expand NATO up to the moon, which involved investing heavily in military operations in Ukraine and threatening Russia's energy exports to Europe. However, when Trump took office, he shifted U.S. foreign policy priorities to domestic concerns and adopted a neutral stance with Russia. This change in policy disrupted the investments made by multinational corporations, including those in the energy sector, and threatened the expected returns on their investments. The U.S. had orchestrated a coup in Ukraine in 2014, which led to the overthrow of the democratically elected president and the expectation of retaking Ukrainian territory. When this did not happen, tens of billions of dollars in investments were left stranded, leaving companies like Chevron, Exxon, Shell, and Halliburton with significant losses.
Financial interests fueled geopolitical tensions between US and Ukraine: During a period of US-Ukraine tensions, American companies sought to replace Russian ones in the oil and gas sector, leading to financial interests influencing political actions and investigations.
During the time between 2017 and 2019, there were significant financial interests at play in the geopolitical tensions between the United States and Ukraine. These interests were centered around oil and gas supplies and the potential for American companies to replace Russian ones. When Trump's policy towards Russia shifted, it resulted in a reversal of billions of dollars in investments from Biden's backers. In response, they used their influence to control prosecutors, fabricate evidence, and use other tactics to target Trump. This is an example of how power and money motivate political actions, even in complex international situations. The case of George Soros and his involvement in Ukraine illustrates this, as he had significant financial interests in the country's energy assets and used his donations to influence Democrat politics, ultimately leading to investigations into Trump.
Origins of the Russia hoax linked to Ukraine, power plays, and money: US interests, Soros, and Ukrainian politics intertwined in the Russia hoax's origins, involving power struggles and privatization of Ukraine's gas industry, with threats of instability and potential riots if US-backed policies not followed.
The Russia hoax's origins can be traced back to Ukraine and involve power plays and money, particularly regarding the privatization of Ukraine's gas industry and the involvement of George Soros and US government-funded organizations. The discussion also revealed an NGO memo threatening political instability if Zelensky's government didn't adhere to certain US-backed policies, including language laws. This memo, issued by a State Department-affiliated NGO, even threatened potential riots if these red lines were crossed. The situation highlights the complex interplay between US interests, Soros, and Ukrainian politics.
2020 Election Results and Discussion on Street Chaos and Ukraine Collusion: Donald Trump leads in the 2020 presidential election with 64% of votes. Street chaos is a concern if Trump wins. Some individuals involved in Ukraine collusion allegations haven't come clean. Try researching before using new products like Beams Dream Powder and Bone Charge sauna blanket for improved sleep and heart health.
The 2020 presidential election is showing a clear lead for Donald Trump, with only 30% of the votes in and Trump having over 64%. The discussion also touched on the possibility of unprecedented street chaos if Trump wins, and the question of why certain individuals involved in the Ukraine collusion allegations aren't coming clean. Additionally, the hosts discussed potential solutions for poor sleep, including Beams Dream Powder and a sauna blanket from Bone Charge. The sauna blanket was praised for its benefits, including relaxation and improved heart health. The hosts also mentioned the importance of doing research before trying new products.
Nikki Haley's Potential Presidential Campaign and Ukraine's Involvement in the Russia Hoax: Nikki Haley believes Zelensky may reveal Ukraine's role in the Russia hoax, acknowledging potential consequences for him and his government. Historical US-backed leaders speaking out against their countries' relationships with the US have faced backlash. Haley's financial success is linked to defense contractors.
The discussion revolved around Nikki Haley's potential presidential campaign and her past experiences, including her tenure as the US Ambassador to the UN under President Trump. The conversation also touched upon the political situation in Ukraine and the possibility of Zelensky speaking out about the country's involvement in the Russia hoax. Haley expressed her belief that Zelensky might feel compelled to come clean about his country's role, while acknowledging the potential consequences for him and his government. Additionally, the conversation referenced historical examples of US-backed leaders who have spoken out against their countries' relationships with the US, leading to potential backlash. The discussion also touched upon the role of defense contractors in Haley's financial success.
Former Trump campaign manager Paul Manafort's future in prison: Manafort may prefer prison over betraying associates, but political transitions could bring unrest and pressure for amends
The situation for Paul Manafort, a former Trump campaign manager, is precarious as he faces the possibility of spending the rest of his life in prison for his involvement in Russia gate affairs. Some speculate that he might not mind this outcome if it means avoiding spilling state secrets or double-crossing his associates. However, if Trump wins the November elections, he may need Republican support and money, which could put pressure on Manafort to make amends. The left, on the other hand, has a history of using violence during political transitions, which raises concerns about potential unrest if Trump wins and groups like the Transition Integrity Project call for street fights. These are complex issues with significant implications for American politics.
Pentagon, CIA, and State Department officials discussed civil unrest plans if Trump won: High-ranking officials from the Pentagon, CIA, and State Department, including Hillary Clinton's campaign manager, simulated civil unrest scenarios and discussed mobilizing grassroots organizations if Trump won the election.
During the 2020 election, there were concerns among high-ranking officials from the Pentagon, CIA, and State Department, including Hillary Clinton's campaign manager John Podesta, about the potential for widespread civil unrest if Donald Trump won the Electoral College. They simulated various scenarios in a war game exercise and discussed the importance of mobilizing grassroots organizations like Black Lives Matter to shut down the country if necessary. While this may seem alarming, exposing such plans in advance and spreading awareness can help mitigate their potential impact. It's crucial for individuals to stay informed and engaged in the democratic process to prevent any attempts to undermine its legitimacy.
Pre-bunking: Debunking Ideas Before They Go Viral: Understanding and adapting to pre-bunking tactics, such as exposing individuals to weakened arguments and bombarding them with talking points, is crucial in today's political landscape where controlling prosecutors can sway elections.
Pre-bunking is a psychological manipulation tactic used to debunk an idea before it goes viral. This is often achieved by exposing individuals to weakened versions of an argument and then bombarding them with talking points that discredit partial aspects of it. This process creates an immune system response, causing individuals to automatically reject the idea when encountered in the wild. A current example of this is the use of Soros-funded prosecutors to shut down opposition in major cities, making it more difficult for Republicans to win elections. This new era of politics, where elections are not just won by winning in the polls and the press, but also by controlling prosecutors, requires Republicans to adapt and learn how to protect themselves from offensive prosecutions and defend against criminal gangs using defensive protection. The recent elections results in Vermont, Virginia, and North Carolina are clear indicators of the power of this tactic and the importance of understanding and adapting to it.
Far-left groups and institutions: A prison system of control and intimidation: Far-left groups and institutions use fear of chaos and violence to gain control, go unprosecuted for crimes, and collaborate with each other and powerful institutions, creating a prison-like system of control and intimidation
The relationship between certain political groups and institutions, specifically those associated with the far-left, can be described as having elements of a prison system. This theory is based on the idea that these groups use fear of chaos and violence in the streets to encourage people to willingly give up their civil liberties and seek the supposed safety of a controlled environment. Additionally, these groups have reportedly gone unprosecuted for violent crimes and have even received financial compensation from cities. Furthermore, there are allegations of collaboration between these groups and institutions, such as the AFL-CIO and the Chamber of Commerce, which are funded by the National Endowment for Democracy, a known CIA cutout. This collaboration is said to involve the use of union members as "rent-a-riot" street muscle for political purposes. The National Endowment for Democracy has multiple branches, including the International Republican Institute (IRI) and the National Democratic Institute (NDI), as well as the Solidarity Center, which focuses on working with unions, and the Center for International Private Enterprise, which represents the business community. These structures allow the CIA to manipulate both political sides, creating an environment of control and intimidation.
A cabal of four entities plotted to destabilize the US during the 2020 election: A group consisting of labor unions, Black Lives Matter, Chamber of Commerce, and CIA's top cutouts planned to induce a crisis if Trump won, fueled by potential tens of billions in taxpayer funds. Concerns of similar actions in 2024, and potential misuse of funds for Biden's climate court and censorship of climate protest narratives.
During the 2020 election, a cabal of four powerful entities - labor unions, Black Lives Matter activist groups, the Chamber of Commerce, and the CIA's top cutouts - planned to destabilize the country if Trump won. This group, which includes professional government overthrowers, needed to induce a crisis to justify their extraordinary actions. The Chamber of Commerce reportedly paid tens of billions of dollars to these groups. Now, with the 2024 election approaching, there are concerns that this cabal may attempt similar actions again. The mercenary behavior of these groups, fueled by taxpayer funds, is particularly concerning. Additionally, Biden's establishment of a climate court and the government's censorship of certain narratives related to climate protest movements and their affiliated groups raise questions about the potential misuse of taxpayer funds. If Trump were to win in 2024 and engage in a mass purge of those not aligned with the Constitution, it remains to be seen whether he would have enough time to significantly bring the country back on track.
Democratic Party's uncertain future: The Democratic Party's relationship with populism and Trumpism is uncertain due to ongoing legal issues and geopolitical tensions. Embracing domestic populism is a possibility, but depends on the outcome of conflicts and policy decisions. Free speech platforms and investigative reporting are important.
The future of the Democratic Party, specifically regarding its relationship with populism and Trumpism, remains uncertain due to ongoing legal issues and geopolitical tensions. The party may face pressure to embrace domestic populism if a sufficient number of its members can be swayed, but this depends on the outcome of various ongoing conflicts and policy decisions. The speaker also emphasized the importance of free speech platforms like Rumble and the need for continued investigative reporting on censorship and the internet. Overall, the future direction of the Democratic Party is influenced by a complex interplay of legal, geopolitical, and societal factors.
Nikki Haley's Chances in Republican Primary Looking Grim: Despite strong performances in some states, Nikki Haley's chances of winning the Republican primary are slim due to Trump's significant leads in key states like Virginia and North Carolina.
Nikki Haley's chances of winning the Republican primary are looking grim based on the current election results. As of the update, Trump is leading in Vermont, Virginia, and North Carolina with significant margins. Haley's poor performance in Virginia, where she only received 30% of the votes compared to Trump's 66.32%, is particularly noteworthy. Texas and Tennessee are also expected to be blowouts for Trump. The uncommitted votes on the Biden side should also be kept an eye on. The team discussed these results in detail, expressing their appreciation for the large turnout of over 100,000 viewers. The coverage will continue tomorrow at 11 a.m. on Rumble.com.
