Podcast Summary
NYT reports on past investigations, Dan Vongino's impact, and Chuck Norris' fitness secret: The New York Times covers recent investigations and Dan Vongino's influence, while Chuck Norris shares his fitness secret, and New York's Attorney General faces criticism for mismanagement and theft allegations
The New York Times' sudden reporting on past investigations, such as the CIA's involvement with Ukraine and Russia, may be a response to information shared on Dan Vongino's show and in his book. Additionally, Chuck Norris, an action star and US veteran, shares a simple change in his lifestyle that keeps him fit and energized at his age. New York Attorney General Letitia James, on the other hand, is criticized for turning the state into an economic and public safety shithole and proudly tweeting about the money she allegedly stole from Donald Trump. The speaker urges people to leave New York and shares a message for those still living there.
New York City in Crisis: A Communist State with Deep State Support: The deep state and media are at war with the public, shielding illegal immigrants and downplaying crimes. The situation is critical, with untraceable funds fueling illegal activities and potential election interference. Stay informed and protect freedoms.
New York City is in a state of crisis and is becoming a communist state with the support of the deep state and the media. The intelligence community and media are at war with the public, and figures like Nikki Haley are seen as potential backstops in case something happens to prevent Trump from winning the election. The situation is dire, with illegal immigrants committing crimes and being shielded by sanctuary cities, and the media downplaying or misrepresenting the truth. The $10,000 debit card program for illegal immigrants is just one example of the untraceable cash being used for illegal purposes. The deep state is reportedly freaking out at the possibility of Trump's re-election and the exposure of their activities. It is crucial for individuals to be aware of the situation and take action to protect themselves and their freedoms.
Nikki Haley's Persistence in the Race for President: Despite losing primaries, Haley stays in race for money from anti-Trump donors, raising concerns about deep state influence and potential future political power.
Nikki Haley, despite losing the South Carolina primary by a significant margin and having no major victories, continues to insist that she's still in the race for the presidency. This persistence, according to the speaker, is not based on her commitment to her word, but rather on her ability to raise millions of dollars from anti-Trump individuals and organizations. The longer she stays in the race, the more money she earns, and there's speculation that this money could be used to fund her future political endeavors or even to take over the presidency in the unlikely event that Trump is unable to serve. This raises concerns about the potential influence of deep state actors in keeping Haley in the race and the potential consequences if she were to become the nominee.
Exposing the 'Blob' in Power: A network of individuals and organizations, including intelligence community, Soros groups, NGOs, foreign intelligence, and media people, manipulate elections and ignore public concerns. Dan Bongino exposes this network and encourages listeners to do their own research.
There is a powerful network of individuals and organizations, including those in the intelligence community, Soros groups, non-governmental organizations, foreign intelligence operations, and media people, who have manipulated elections and are at war with the public. Dan Bongino, the host of the show, is determined to expose these individuals and named Victoria Newland as one of them. He believes that this network, or "blob," is ignoring the public and panicking as their actions are being exposed. Bongino encourages listeners to do their own research and use his special discount code to try Beams Dream Powder, a sleep aid that has helped him get a good night's rest. He is committed to exposing the truth and making the "blob" run in fear of their exposure.
American officials used Ukraine as a personal piggy bank: The Biden family and officials like Victoria Nuland have profited from Ukraine's internal conflicts, with concerns about potential exposure of their actions if Trump returns to power.
The Biden family and various officials, including Victoria Nuland, have been using Ukraine as a source of personal gain for decades. The country has been a "piggy bank" for many individuals, including the Bidens, who have profited from the internal division in Ukraine. Nuland, during the Obama-Biden administration, worked to ensure that the monarchy in Ukraine remained in power. She is heard in a recorded conversation manipulating the selection of the next Ukrainian leader. The intelligence community is reportedly concerned about the prospect of a second Trump presidency due to the deep involvement of American officials in Ukrainian affairs and potential exposure of their actions. This involvement goes beyond typical diplomatic efforts and includes personal financial gain.
U.S. diplomat Victoria Newland's role in Ukraine's anti-corruption bureau and her knowledge of Steele dossier: U.S. diplomat Victoria Newland, involved in Ukraine's anti-corruption efforts, was informed about the Steele dossier in late 2016 and acknowledged its ties to Soros-funded groups. She also confirmed the existence of biological research facilities in Ukraine, challenging previous dismissals as conspiracy theories.
Victoria Newland, a U.S. diplomat, played a significant role in Ukraine's anti-corruption bureau (NABU) which had ties to Soros-funded groups. She pushed for more U.S. involvement in Ukraine's affairs and was informed about the Steele dossier in late July 2016, while the FBI was investigating possible Trump-Russia ties. Newland acknowledged these facts publicly, contradicting previous narratives that the Russia investigation was not influenced by Ukraine. She was also familiar with Christopher Steele's work and had received reports on political maneuverings in Russia and Ukraine. The discovery of biological research facilities in Ukraine, initially dismissed as a conspiracy theory, was also confirmed by Newland. These revelations suggest that the Russia investigation may have had deeper roots in Ukraine than previously acknowledged.
Ukraine as an 'appendix state' for US intelligence gathering and financial transactions: The US has utilized Ukraine for intelligence and financial purposes in the context of the Russia hoax, leading to various reactions and counter-narratives
Ukraine has been used as an "appendix state" for intelligence gathering and financial transactions by the U.S., particularly in relation to the Russia hoax. This has led to significant reactions and counter-narratives from various media outlets and government agencies, as exposed on the show. Meanwhile, unrelated topics were discussed, including the benefits of Fast Growing Trees, an online nursery, and the Omaha Steak Semiannual Sale. However, the main focus remained on the ongoing investigation into the Russia hoax and its origins in Ukraine.
CIA's Intelligence Partnership with Ukraine Sparks Controversy: The CIA's collaboration with Ukraine raises concerns about potential manipulation of election narratives, with critics arguing that Ukrainian officials, not Russians, may have interfered in the 2016 election and that the deep state is trying to shape public opinion through selective storytelling
There are allegations that the CIA and Ukraine have been working together to perpetuate the narrative about Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. election. This comes to light as the 2024 election approaches and the possibility of Donald Trump's return to the White House looms. The New York Times published an article titled "The Spy War, How the CIA Secretly Helps Ukraine Fight Putin," which details the intelligence partnership between the two countries. Critics argue that this partnership has been used to create a false narrative about Russian involvement in the election, and that Ukrainian officials, not Russians, were the ones who meddled in the election. The deep state is reportedly trying to "pre-bunk" this narrative by getting ahead of potential stories and presenting the Ukrainians as heroes in the fight against Russian interference. However, some argue that this narrative is misleading and that the real story is the deep state's attempt to manipulate public opinion. Zelensky, the Ukrainian president, is said to be aware of this situation.
Ukrainian officials sabotaged Trump's campaign during Obama's tenure, but it was framed as a Russia hoax: Obama administration officials attempted to undermine Trump's campaign through Ukrainian contacts, but this was mischaracterized as Russian interference in the media
During the Obama administration, there were ongoing efforts by Ukrainian officials to sabotage Donald Trump's campaign. This was known as early as 2017, but it was framed as a Russia hoax in the media. John Brennan and the CIA were reportedly involved in these efforts, and Obama was aware of them. The New York Times and other media outlets have since written about this, but the narrative has been to protect Obama and isolate him from any involvement. Recently, a key figure in these events, Igor Danchenko, was arrested for allegedly providing false information to the FBI. However, he is not a Russian agent, but rather an informant for the CIA. The media's portrayal of these events as a Russia hoax is misleading and inaccurate, and it is important to understand the true context of what happened.
Allegations of Russian spy Smirnoff's involvement in Ukraine's Russia hoax: Russian spy Smirnoff, linked to a Ukrainian operation, may have had dirt on Bidens and Israeli officials. Biden's advisor Jake Sullivan reportedly promoted the Russia hoax during Hillary's campaign. Zelensky could reveal truth about Russia hoax origins, potentially changing political landscape.
There are allegations of a Russian spy, named Smirnoff, who was believed to have dirt on both the Bidens and Israeli officials. This spy was reportedly linked to a Ukrainian operation to discredit Trump's campaign, using fake ledgers and intelligence. Biden's current National Security Advisor, Jake Sullivan, was reportedly involved in promoting the Russia hoax during Hillary Clinton's campaign. Now, Zelensky has the power to disclose the truth about the origins of the Russia hoax, which started in Ukraine, and could potentially change the political landscape. The allegations suggest that the Ukrainian anti-corruption agency, NABU, was used as a front for the FBI and CIA to launder fake intelligence about Trump.
Misinformation about election interference and sensitive topics: Individuals and media outlets spreading misinformation can lead to confusion and outrage, highlighting the importance of fact-checking and journalistic standards.
There are ongoing attempts to spread misinformation about election interference and controversial topics like sex education in schools. Some individuals and media outlets, despite being called out on their lack of expertise or questionable stances, continue to promote such content. These actions can lead to confusion and outrage among the public, particularly when it comes to sensitive issues involving children. It's crucial for individuals to fact-check information and for media professionals to uphold journalistic standards, ensuring that they provide accurate and contextually sound information.
Impact of AI on Information Dissemination: Fear of Exposing Falsehoods: Fear that AI could reveal truths challenging established narratives, particularly in political contexts, may lead to efforts to control its use. Importance of fact-checking and accessing diverse perspectives emphasized.
There are concerns among some individuals about the potential impact of artificial intelligence (AI) on the dissemination of information and news. These concerns stem from a fear that AI could reveal truths that may challenge established narratives or beliefs, particularly in the context of political issues. The speaker in this discussion expresses this fear, referencing the example of Taylor Lorenz and her writing for various publications. He argues that individuals like Lorenz may fear the transparency and accuracy that AI could bring, as it may expose false or misleading information. The speaker also emphasizes the importance of being able to fact-check information and access diverse perspectives, which he believes is threatened by those who seek to control the narrative. Overall, the discussion highlights the potential implications of AI on the information landscape and the importance of ensuring that technology is used in a way that promotes truth and transparency.
