Podcast Summary
President Trump's visit criticized, Dan Bongino debunks media's narrative: Dan Bongino discussed the importance of investing in real estate for wealth building and introduced Roofstock, a simplified investing platform for passive income and diversification with a special listener offer.
President Trump's visit to troops overseas was unfairly criticized by the media, and Dan Bongino, with his unique expertise and insight, debunked the media's negative narrative. The show also promoted Roofstock, an investing platform that allows individuals to invest in single-family homes across the country and earn passive income. Bongino emphasized the importance of investing in real estate for building personal wealth and diversifying investment portfolios, and Roofstock simplifies the process with its transparency and ease of use. The company even offers a 30-day money-back guarantee and will pay projected rental income for up to a year if your rental property is vacant. This month, Roofstock is offering a special deal for Dan Bongino Show listeners, who will receive a $500 credit towards their Roofstock marketplace fee by using the code "Dan" at checkout.
Media's Narrative vs. Reality of Trump's War Zone Visit: Despite media's biased reporting, Trump's war zone visit was likely planned months in advance and received a warm welcome from troops.
The media's narrative surrounding President Trump's visit to a war zone during the holiday season was not accurate. Contrary to the media's suggestion that they shamed the president into making the visit, the trip was likely planned months in advance. The media's activism and biased reporting are damaging their credibility, allowing good journalism to rise to the surface. The president received a warm welcome from the troops, as evidenced by videos shared on social media. It's important to consider the facts and not be swayed by biased narratives.
Media speculation on Trump's troop visit was misleading: Despite media claims, Trump's decision to cancel a troop visit wasn't influenced by criticism, as the trip was already planned beforehand.
The media's criticism of President Trump for not visiting troops during the holiday season did not influence his decision to cancel the trip to a war zone, as the trip was already planned before the criticism. The planning and security measures for such trips involve a very limited number of people, and non-disclosure agreements are signed to maintain secrecy. The media's suggestion that Trump's decision was a response to criticism is therefore misleading. The speaker, who has experience in planning such trips, emphasizes that the trips are planned weeks in advance and that only a select few people are privy to the information.
President Obama's Surprise Visit to Afghanistan in 2008: A Planned Event: Media's portrayal of Obama's Afghanistan visit as a response to criticism is inaccurate. Normal and expected for troops to interact with commanders in war zones.
The story of President Obama's surprise visit to Afghanistan in 2008 was carefully planned and orchestrated, and the media's portrayal of it as a response to criticism is inaccurate. Additionally, the idea that troops were in violation of the Hatch Act for bringing MAGA hats to be signed is a ridiculous narrative. The president's interaction with the troops was a normal and expected gesture in a war zone, and the idea of investigating and prosecuting troops for such an action is a stretch. The media's focus on trivial and negative stories about Trump and his administration detracts from important issues and demonstrates a lack of objectivity.
President Trump's firm stance on border security leads to government shutdown: Trump's demand for border wall funding and unwillingness to back down causes government shutdown, supported by American people despite media narratives and DC opposition
The ongoing government shutdown is a result of President Trump's firm stance on border security and his unwillingness to back down from his demand for funding towards a border wall. The Democrats, who will soon take control of the House of Representatives, may face challenges in dealing with Trump's direct approach and clear messaging on the issue. The wall is seen as an effective deterrent by security professionals and has proven to reduce illegal immigration in areas where it has been installed. Despite criticisms and alternative solutions, the wall's primary goal is to create a deterrent and reduce the number of illegal crossings. Trump's ability to bypass the DC establishment and media narratives has been a significant factor in the shutdown, and the American people generally support his stance on border security.
Democrats to take control, own shutdown narrative: Democrats face criticism for blocking border security funding, while Trump maintains a strong stance
The Democrats are about to take control of the House, making them responsible for passing funding measures. However, they will now own the shutdown narrative, particularly since President Trump has successfully framed the issue as one of border security. This puts Democrats in a difficult position, especially in swing districts, where they may be criticized for standing in the way of border security. Trump, on the other hand, is holding a winning hand on this critical issue and should not back down. In other news, The Farmer's Dog is offering fresh, nutritious meals for dogs delivered directly to your door, providing an alternative to processed kibble and canned food. Lastly, there is growing speculation that the Mueller probe's primary goal is to cover up the crimes of the Democrats, the Obama administration, and deep state actors involved in the spying operation on Trump. These are interesting times, and it's essential to stay informed.
An unusual 302 report was generated following Flynn's White House interview: In counterintelligence probes, 302 reports are usually not generated due to classified info, but one was for Flynn's interview, fueling speculation
The generation of a 302 report following the interview of Michael Flynn at the White House by the FBI's Peter Strzok and Joe Pientka, just days after President Trump's inauguration, is an oddity. According to a former senior manager in the FBI, such reports are not typically generated in counterintelligence investigations due to the classified nature of the information involved. Instead, electronic communications are used. The former manager's explanation raises questions about the nature of the investigation into Flynn and the purpose of the 302 report. This discrepancy, if not explained, could fuel further speculation and debate.
FBI's Unusual 302 Reporting in Flynn Investigation: The FBI's generation of a 302 report during Michael Flynn's Counterintelligence investigation, marked as deliberative and draft, with inconsistencies and no clear predicate crime raises questions about the legitimacy of the investigation.
During a Counterintelligence (CI) investigation into Michael Flynn, the FBI generated a 302 report using criminal investigation procedures. This is unusual as 302 reports are typically meant to be testimonial, not deliberative. The original report was marked as deliberative and draft, and there are two different versions with different dates. The FBI agent explains that the 302 is used for accurate recollection of what the interviewee said for potential testimony in court. However, since the 302 was generated during a CI investigation, there was no predicate crime for the interview. The FBI interviewed Flynn without a clear reason, and the Washington Post reported the day before the interview that the bureau had found nothing illicit in Flynn's calls with the Russian ambassador. The FBI's justification for filling out criminal paperwork during a CI investigation is unclear, and the inconsistencies in the 302 reports raise questions about the legitimacy of the investigation.
FBI's inconsistent rationale in Michael Flynn investigation: The FBI's handling of Michael Flynn's interview raises questions about the legitimacy of the charges against him due to inconsistencies and lack of transparency in the investigation's purpose.
The investigation into Michael Flynn's alleged false statements to the FBI during their interview seems to be based on a flawed and inconsistent rationale. The FBI interviewed Flynn under the guise of a counterintelligence investigation, but filled out criminal paperwork and indicated that he had lied, despite the FBI's own 302 summary of the interview not mentioning any collusion-related topics. This inconsistency creates a lack of clarity about the true purpose of the investigation and raises questions about the legitimacy of the charges against Flynn. The situation highlights the complexity and potential issues with the ongoing investigation, and underscores the need for transparency and clarity in the legal process.
Mueller probe used to interfere with ongoing Dem investigations: The Mueller probe was used to delay or prevent investigations into Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation by keeping the focus on Russian interference in the 2016 election
The Mueller probe was used as a tool to interfere with ongoing investigations into Democrats, specifically those related to Uranium One and the Clinton Foundation. According to the speaker, Robert Mueller was the ideal choice for this task due to his connections to key players involved in these scandals. The ongoing nature of the Mueller probe was used as a reason to delay or prevent other investigations from progressing. It's important to note that the purpose of an investigation is to investigate a crime, not to investigate for the sake of investigating. However, in this case, the Mueller probe was used as a perpetual investigation to cover up misdeeds and prevent other investigations from uncovering potential wrongdoing.
Political investigation and US debt: The Trump investigation distracts from addressing potential wrongdoings in other areas and the US debt, projected to reach $600B in interest payments, requires immediate action to prevent severe consequences
The ongoing investigation into former President Trump serves no clear purpose other than to prevent looking into potential wrongdoings in other areas, such as the Clinton Foundation or Obama administration. The debt situation of the US is another major concern, with the country holding a record-breaking $20 trillion debt load, and interest payments projected to reach $600 billion annually within the next five years. This debt situation, if not addressed, could lead to severe consequences, including the possibility of the lenders bearing the burden of the debt. It's crucial for lawmakers to take action to address both issues.
Preventing Economic Catastrophe and the Bill Barr Memo Controversy: The federal budget's growth could lead to economic disaster, so spending should be capped and focus on growth. The Bill Barr memo controversy is a left-wing attempt to block Barr's AG nomination, as his memo was a private argument on presidential power, not obstruction.
The continued growth of the federal budget could lead to catastrophic consequences for the US economy, including high interest rates, potential bankruptcy, hyperinflation, and a collapse similar to that of Argentina. To prevent this, the speaker suggests capping federal spending and focusing on economic growth. Regarding the Bill Barr memo controversy, the speaker clarifies that Barr wrote the memo as a private citizen and made a well-reasoned argument that a president cannot be charged with obstruction of justice for administrative decisions like firing an executive branch employee. The left is using this as an excuse to block Barr's nomination for Attorney General, but none of the alleged actions constitute obstruction as defined by the law.
Obama's school discipline policy caused unintended consequences: The Obama administration's guidance letter discouraging suspensions led to chaos in some schools and potentially put students at risk. The focus should be on addressing discrimination while ensuring safe learning environments.
The Obama administration's guidance letter on school discipline policies caused unintended consequences by discouraging suspensions, leading to chaos in some schools and potentially putting students at risk. The Trump administration, under Betsy DeVos, is reversing this policy. It's important to remember that every individual case of discrimination is wrong, but measuring statistics such as suspension rates without considering the context of each case can be meaningless and potentially harmful. The focus should be on addressing discrimination where it exists, while ensuring that schools remain safe environments for all students.
Emphasizing the importance of education and justice for all: Listen to the show for valuable info on education and justice, prioritize these fundamental rights, and subscribe for free on iTunes, SoundCloud, and iHeart.
The importance of education and justice for all, including children, was emphasized in the recent discussion. Parents deserve the best for their kids, and these fundamental rights should not be overlooked. The show, which covers various topics, had a packed episode with valuable information. Listeners are encouraged to subscribe to the show for free on platforms like iTunes, SoundCloud, and iHeart, as it helps move the show up the charts. Despite the Christmas holiday, the show managed to produce content and had impressive listenership numbers. Overall, the message is to prioritize education and justice for all, and to stay informed by tuning in to the show.
