Logo
    Search

    From the Vault: The Origins of Numeracy

    enJuly 16, 2022

    Podcast Summary

    • Exploring new things and building community connectionsDiscovering new foods, volunteering, and learning about AI can bring hope, enrichment, and social bonds. Neighbor to Neighbor emphasizes the importance of neighbors, JB Smooth introduces a superfood, and Technically Speaking discusses AI's potential impact.

      Building strong community connections and discovering new things, whether it's through volunteering or trying new foods, can bring hope and enrichment to our lives. Doctor Laurie Santos introduced Neighbor to Neighbor, a California volunteers network, emphasizing the importance of neighbors in creating meaningful social bonds and preparing for emergencies. Meanwhile, JB Smooth discussed the underappreciated Kakadu plum, a superfood with 100 times more vitamin C than oranges, which highlights the value of exploring new discoveries. Additionally, the future holds the potential for artificial intelligence to revolutionize various industries, as discussed on Technically Speaking, an Intel podcast. Lastly, Stuff to Blow Your Mind explored the origins of numeracy, emphasizing the complexities of understanding numbers and their role in our brains. So, whether it's through community building, trying new things, or delving into the mysteries of the mind, there's always something new to discover.

    • The Existence and Role of NumbersNumbers are symbols representing precise quantities, existing independently and essential in mathematics.

      Numbers are discrete entities with exact values that are represented by symbols, and they exist independently of any material reality being counted. The speaker emphasized that numbers are not just a way to quantify things, but they have an existence of their own. They are symbols that can be manipulated and interpreted without the need for any physical objects. The speaker also mentioned that the concept of numbers is often taken for granted, and it's helpful to take a step back and contemplate what numbers really are. Numbers are not just words or signs, but they represent a precise quantity that is different from other quantities. The speaker recommended reading "What is Mathematics?" by Richard Courant and Herbert Robbins for a more in-depth understanding of the subject. Overall, the speaker encouraged listeners to appreciate the wonder of numbers and their role in mathematics.

    • The innate ability to understand and manipulate numbers is a foundation for advanced mathematical knowledge.Our natural cognitive abilities for numeracy paved the way for mathematical advancements, dating back to ancient civilizations.

      The ability to understand and manipulate numbers, known as numeracy, is a fundamental aspect of human cognition that predates literacy. This innate ability allows us to represent numerical magnitude and quantity of individual items, which is the foundation for more advanced mathematical knowledge. The use of counting and keeping track of quantities dates back to ancient civilizations, with evidence of mathematical activity emerging around 1560 BCE. However, the more functional aspects of counting and record-keeping likely go even further back. The need to keep track of goods and trade necessitated the use of objects or symbols to represent quantities. This discussion highlights how our natural cognitive abilities set the foundation for more complex intellectual activities, but we must also consider the role of culture and education in building upon these foundations.

    • The Importance of Numeracy in Human CivilizationNumeracy is a crucial skill that evolved alongside human civilization, allowing us to manage complex situations and build a foundation for advanced mathematics.

      Our ability to understand and work with numbers, or numeracy, is a crucial skill that has evolved alongside human civilization. From counting the number of fingers and toes to create numerical systems, to using external tools like clay tablets and later, paper and pencil, our number sense has been essential for managing complex situations, whether it's buying coffee for multiple households or running a business. However, the degree to which numeracy is innate or culturally acquired is still a topic of debate. While it may feel natural to count or do basic math, it might not be an automatically evolved capacity for all humans. Instead, it could be a learned skill, like reading music or playing football. The roots of mathematics, therefore, lie in the externalization of our number sense, and the development of numerical systems has allowed us to build a tower of knowledge, from basic arithmetic to advanced mathematics, ultimately giving us a greater understanding of the world around us.

    • Is math a human invention or discovery?Our brains have the capacity for math but require cultural instruction to fully develop these abilities, highlighting the intersection of nature and nurture

      The discussion about whether numeracy is an innate capability in the human brain or a cultural invention touches on the broader question of whether math is a human invention or a discovery. While math is a human-created system of rules and symbols, it can also reveal objective facts about the universe. The question then becomes whether numeracy is a baseline capability in the human brain or a learned skill. The speakers suggest that it likely involves both, as our brains have the capacity for math but also require cultural instruction to fully develop these abilities. This intersection of nature and nurture is a fascinating aspect of the topic. Additionally, the conversation touched on the sponsor Astepro, a fast-acting nasal allergy spray that can provide relief within 30 minutes, making it a valuable tool for those dealing with seasonal allergies.

    • Animals possess innate numeracy abilitiesAnimals can discern quantity, even without visual cues, suggesting they have a mental representation of numbers

      Animals, including monkeys, apes, dolphins, and dogs, possess some innate sense of quantity, demonstrating basic numeracy abilities. Studies have shown that these creatures can discern which group has more items, usually when the numbers are under ten. For instance, a dog can often identify the pile with more food. However, numerically close comparisons are more challenging, such as distinguishing between five and six. Researchers have also found that animals' ability to manage different food quantities improves when they are not visually available at the time of choice. This suggests that animals have some form of mental representation of numbers. This discovery adds to the evidence supporting the idea of a biologically endowed number sense. In essence, animals' capacity for numeracy is an intriguing aspect of their cognitive abilities. Their ability to discern quantity, even in the absence of visual cues, highlights the complex nature of their mental processes. As research in this area continues, we may uncover even more fascinating insights into the similarities and differences between human and animal numeracy.

    • Dogs may understand numbers in a rudimentary wayStudies show dogs can choose larger quantities of food, suggesting an innate number sense, independent of olfactory cues. However, the role of smell in number perception is unclear.

      Dogs, and possibly other animals, may possess an innate capacity for understanding numbers, at least in a rudimentary way. A study showed that dogs could choose the larger quantity of food even when it was not simultaneously visible at the time of choice. This ability was found to be independent of other cues like olfactory cues. However, the question arises if we should consider olfactory data as different from visual data when discussing numbers. While a dog might smell more food in one pile, it does not necessarily mean they are dealing with different numbers. The visual sense seems to be more useful for distinguishing numbers of objects. Research also suggests that human babies have a biologically endowed number sense that is not learned through culture. These findings challenge the notion that number sense is uniquely human and highlight the need for further research on animal cognition.

    • The debate over human number sense: Innate or learned?Research suggests an innate biological capacity for number sense, but the role of culture and learning cannot be ignored.

      The debate over whether human number sense is innate or a product of culture continues, with evidence from neuroscience suggesting an innate biological capacity. Researchers like Andreas Nieder argue that similarities in brain processing of quantities between humans, nonhuman animals, and infants indicate an innate number sense. However, not all agree, with some suggesting that children learn to count through mechanical repetition before developing an understanding of number principles. Schwartz's 1995 article, "Is Mathematical Competence Innate?" discusses this divide, noting that a principles before model, where children understand counting principles before learning to count, does not necessarily imply an innate mathematical ability if the principles themselves are learned. Ultimately, the debate highlights the complexity of understanding the origins of mathematical abilities, with both innate and learned factors likely playing a role.

    • Human abilities are shaped by both biological and cultural influencesOur unique human abilities, such as making fine distinctions in quantities, are shaped by both our evolutionary past and cultural learning.

      While our abilities to engage in activities like tennis or using numerical education are not biologically evolved for those specific purposes, they do make use of capacities that have evolved based on ancestral pressures. These abilities are then shaped and abstracted through cultural environments and education. For instance, humans' unique ability to make fine distinctions between differences in quantities, which is not observed in typically nonhuman animals or babies, is a result of numerical education. Researchers like Rafael Nunez argue that numeracy is a cultural invention and needs to be learned, acknowledging the unique human ability to distinguish fine differences in quantities. Overall, our abilities are shaped by both biological and cultural influences.

    • Understanding Number Perception Across Cultures and SpeciesStudies show that human and animal ways of perceiving and communicating numbers can differ, with some cultures using nose pointing and others having a foundation in logarithmic cognition. Babies who can distinguish between large and small groups are more likely to excel in numeracy.

      Our ways of communicating and perceiving numbers can vary greatly across cultures and species. A study on the Yupno people of Papua New Guinea revealed that this language group has a higher relative frequency of pointing with the nose instead of the index finger. This could be linked to their language having more geographically specific demonstratives, reducing the need for precise pointing. Researcher Mariano Sigman also proposes the idea of distinguishing between quantical cognition (perceiving differences in quantity) and numerical cognition (comparing exact numbers). He suggests that humans naturally process quantities on a logarithmic scale, and babies who can distinguish between large and small groups are more likely to excel in numeracy. This primitive number sense is the foundation for acquiring numeracy and mathematics. The arithmetic scale, which we learn in school, is based on evenly spaced numbers, while logarithmic cognition views differences as ratios rather than absolute magnitudes. This concept can be related to the idea of Fermi estimation, where approximate calculations are made based on orders of magnitude. These findings highlight the complexity and diversity of human and animal cognition.

    • Understanding Different Ways of Conceiving NumbersFermi estimations use logarithmic thinking, useful for quick approximations, and reflect cultural differences. Both logarithmic and arithmetic thinking have their place.

      Our ability to understand and conceptualize numbers goes beyond just arithmetic thinking. Enrico Fermi, a famous physicist, was known for his estimating skills, which seemed to be based on a logarithmic sense of numbers. On a logarithmic scale, differences between large numbers become less significant, making it useful for quick and approximate estimations. This way of thinking is not a sign of lack of sophistication but rather a reflection of what kind of quantity concepts are useful for a particular way of life. Hunter-gatherer societies, for instance, tend to use logarithmic thinking more than arithmetic. This innate capacity for logarithmic thinking can be harnessed and retrained to use the arithmetic number line through education. The ability to engage in logarithmic thinking is incredible, especially when we consider that human infants possess this capacity. Overall, the discussion highlights the importance of understanding that different ways of conceiving numbers serve various purposes and that both logarithmic and arithmetic thinking have their place.

    • Unique solutions for better ride experiencesEBay Motors guarantees perfect fit and competitive prices for car parts, while Hyundai's new Santa Fe offers versatility with H Track All-Wheel Drive and ample cargo space. Piaget's research reveals our instinctive use of visual features for quantity judgement and potential number module in the brain.

      Both eBay Motors and Hyundai offer unique solutions to make your ride experience better and more efficient. eBay Motors ensures a perfect fit with their guaranteed fit feature and competitive prices for various car parts. On the other hand, Hyundai's new Santa Fe offers versatility with its H Track All-Wheel Drive system and ample cargo space, allowing for epic adventures. Additionally, Piaget's research on children's instinctive use of visual features to judge quantities was discussed, which might explain some common experiences like crumb blindness. This research also highlights the potential existence of a number module in the brain for judging quantities. Overall, these discoveries emphasize the importance of tailored solutions and our instinctive abilities.

    • The relationship between number sense and language is more complex than previously thoughtDaniel Ansari's research challenges the notion that number symbols directly map onto non-symbolic number processing, suggesting distinct differences in brain processing for visual cues vs symbolic numbers, and the importance of language in understanding complex concepts.

      The relationship between our ability to process non-symbolic numbers and symbolic numbers, as studied in neuroscience research, is more complicated than previously thought. Daniel Ansari's research challenges the notion that the brain mechanisms for processing culturally invented number symbols map directly onto the non-symbolic number system. Instead, it seems that the brain may be doing something distinctively different when processing quantities based on visual cues versus symbolic numbers. This idea can be linked back to the importance of language in understanding complex concepts, as without a word for a concept, it's harder to make comparisons, analogies, and metaphors. This concept might also apply to the development of numeracy and the use of numbers in human history. The invention of number systems may have unlocked new ways of understanding and manipulating numbers that weren't possible without a naming system. This is just one perspective on the topic, and there are many questions still to be answered, such as how and when our prehistoric ancestors first started using numbers and what we can learn from different number systems throughout history. Overall, this discussion highlights the intricacies of the relationship between language, number sense, and the invention of number systems.

    • The lasting impression of a single experienceA single experience can be totalized and generalized, leading to misunderstandings and feelings of insecurity or unfairness.

      Our experiences, even if they only happen once, can leave a lasting impression on us. This was illustrated in a personal story shared during the podcast about a child's reaction to an adult taking a bite of food from his plate. The child seemed to feel that the adult was taking it all, despite the adult not consuming the entirety of the food. This phenomenon, where a single experience is totalized and generalized, can lead to misunderstandings and feelings of insecurity or unfairness. This concept may not have been directly related to the discussion on numbers and quantities, but it's an interesting psychological phenomenon worth noting. Overall, the podcast explored various aspects of numbers and their role in our lives, from the psychological to the practical. If you're interested in learning more, be sure to check out Stuff to Blow Your Mind's episodes on your favorite podcast platform.

    • Tennessee: A Sonic AdventureTennessee offers a unique blend of visual and auditory experiences, from historic music venues to the sounds of nature and children playing.

      Tennessee is not just a feast for the eyes, but also a treat for the ears. From the lively tunes of historic music venues to the crackling sound of a campfire in the wilderness, Tennessee offers an auditory experience that complements its stunning visual landscapes. The sound of children laughing and playing adds to the state's perfect symphony. So, if you're planning a trip, make sure to add Tennessee to your list for an unforgettable sensory adventure. Visit attnvacation.com to start planning your trip to this sonically beautiful destination.

    Recent Episodes from Stuff To Blow Your Mind

    From the Vault: Do ants make traps?

    From the Vault: Do ants make traps?

    The trap is insidious. But of course it is. It was designed and executed… by ants? In this episode of Stuff to Blow Your Mind, the ant wars continue as Robert and Joe explore some of the possibility that a few formidable Formicidae species actually lay traps. (originally published 01/20/2022)

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Smart Talks with IBM: AI & the Productivity Paradox

    Smart Talks with IBM: AI & the Productivity Paradox

    In a rapidly evolving world, we need to balance the fear surrounding AI and its role in the workplace with its potential to drive productivity growth. In this special live episode of Smart Talks with IBM, Malcolm Gladwell is joined onstage by Rob Thomas, senior vice president of software and chief commercial officer at IBM, during NY Tech Week. They discuss “the productivity paradox,” the importance of open-source AI, and a future where AI will touch every industry.

    This is a paid advertisement from IBM. The conversations on this podcast don't necessarily represent IBM's positions, strategies or opinions.

    Visit us at ibm.com/smarttalks

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Related Episodes

    How To Prepare For The Future With John Sanei

    How To Prepare For The Future With John Sanei

    This week, on the Fitness + Technology podcast, Bryan O’Rourke welcomes John Sanei to the show. John is a keynote speaker, futurist, advisor, and best selling author helping individuals and organizations prepare for the uncertain future and transforming our awareness to perceive new possibilities and embrace change. Today, John joins Bryan in a fascinating conversation on new perspectives to unlock innovative solutions in an ever-evolving world.

    One Powerful Quote:

    2:57: “You cannot solve a problem from the same awareness that created it."

    4-10 Bullet Points (w/ timestamps) - Highlighting key topics discussed:

    2:18: Bryan opens the show by asking John to synthesize how we should be preparing for the future. 

    8:46: John articulates on the implications of commoditizing in all industries.

    15:32: Bryan inquires with John about how leaders should change and reform their businesses. 

    22:19: John shares his recommendations on books and podcasts. 

    25:33: Bryan wraps up the show with John imparting his final pearls of wisdom to the listeners. 

    Bullet List of Resources:

    https://johnsanei.com/

    https://drjoedispenza.com/products/becoming-supernatural-by-dr-joe-dispenza-paperback-book

    https://pod.link/profg?gclid=Cj0KCQjwzdOlBhCNARIsAPMwjbwe4oYpZHYaM-BcckdCAbW7jY_GtnKYRTMVDZGf67dM1MZve9CFQRwaAsB1EALw_wcB

    Guest Contact Information:

    https://www.linkedin.com/in/john-sanei/

    https://twitter.com/IamJohnSanei

    https://www.instagram.com/johnsanei/?hl=en

    https://www.tiktok.com/@johnsanei?lang=en

    https://www.bryankorourke.com/

    https://www.linkedin.com/in/bryankorourke/

    http://www.fittechcouncil.org/

    https://www.youtube.com/user/bko61163

    Cathy O'Neil on “Weapons of Math Destruction”

    Cathy O'Neil on “Weapons of Math Destruction”

    Our dangerous reliance on big data: in an episode recorded before the election, Rich and Paul talk to Cathy O’Neil, author of Weapons of Math Destruction: How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. They discuss Cathy’s origins in the math world, her years at a hedge fund on the brink of the 2008 financial crisis, the lack of transparency in the Department of Education’s data, and the various examples of “weapons of math destruction” in her book—all the ways that data is used to harm.

    See Privacy Policy at https://art19.com/privacy and California Privacy Notice at https://art19.com/privacy#do-not-sell-my-info.

    From Jumping Spiders to Silicon: Neuroscience and the Future of Computing - Intel on AI Season 3, Episode 1

    From Jumping Spiders to Silicon: Neuroscience and the Future of Computing - Intel on AI Season 3, Episode 1

    In this episode of Intel on AI host Amir Khosrowshahi and Bruno Olshausen talk about neuroscience and the future of computing. Bruno is a professor at Berkeley with appointments in the Helen Wills Neuroscience Institute and School of Optometry. He is also the director of the Redwood center for Theoretical Neuroscience, which brings the fields of physics, mathematics, engineering, and neuroscience together to study how networks of neurons in the brain process information.

    In the episode, Bruno and Amir discuss research about recording large populations of neurons, hyperdimensional computing, and discovering new types of engineering principles. Bruno talks about how in order to understand intelligence and its underpinnings, we have to understand the origins of intelligence and perceptual psychology outside of mammalian brains. He points to the sophisticated visual system of jumping spiders as inspiration for developing systems that use low energy in a small form factor. By better understanding the origins of perception and other biophysical structures, Bruno theorizes the artificial intelligence field may evolve beyond image recognition tasks of current neural networks. Bruno and Amir close the episode by talking about the elementary units of computation, the idea of “listening to silicon” as proposed by Carver Mead, neuromorphic computing, and what the future of research might hold.

    Academic research discussed in the podcast episode:

    Endings - Do they matter?

    Endings - Do they matter?
    In our on going look at the "meta" surrounding video games and pop culture, we look at when things come to an end. Is the ending important? Can it ruin an otherwise perfectly great work? Can they elevate a mediocre piece? Do we much too much stock in how something ends? Well, through their adorable amateur meanderings, Ben and Andy try to tackle this thorny issue, by looking at Bioshock: Infinite, A.I, Mass Effect and many others. Find us on Twitter: @waimpodcast @AndyKavna @BenDubsMac

    88. Can OpenAi's SORA learn and model real-world physics? (Part 1 of n)

    88.  Can OpenAi's SORA learn and model real-world physics? (Part 1 of n)
    All content is available commercial free on patreon as well as on our Spreaker Supporters Club


    Enjoy this content? Would you like to support us? The best ways to support us are currently to subscribe to our Yourube Channel

    This is a follow up on our previous episode on OpenAi's SORA. We attempt to answer the question, "Can OpenAi's SORA model real-world physics?"

    We go over the details of the technical report, we discuss some controversial opinoins by experts in the field at Nvdia and Google's Deep Mind.

    The transcript for episode is avialable below upon request.