Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Women's growing presence in the jail systemHistorical biases against women committing crimes have decreased, but still exist. The rise in women in prison is linked to policies from the 1980s, mental health deinstitutionalization, and growing awareness of women's criminal capabilities.

      The increase in the number of women in the jail system over the last 50 years can be attributed to a growing awareness of women's criminal capabilities, as well as a decrease in bias against women being held accountable for their crimes. However, despite this trend, females still make up only a small percentage of the overall prison population. The authors of a recent book on understanding antisocial personality disorder in female offenders also noted that historical biases against women committing crimes have decreased, but still exist, particularly in relation to sex offenses. They also pointed out that the rise in the number of women in prison could be linked to policies from the 1980s, such as the War on Drugs and longer sentences for substance abuse crimes. Additionally, the deinstitutionalization of mental health facilities has led to an increase in the number of mentally ill individuals in the prison system.

    • Mentally ill individuals are being incarcerated instead of receiving community-based careThe US mental health system prioritizes imprisonment over community care, leading to a rise in mentally ill people in prisons and jails.

      The mental health system in the US has shifted towards incarcerating mentally ill individuals instead of providing them with adequate community-based care. This is evidenced by the fact that many state hospitals have closed, leading to a significant increase in the number of mentally ill people in prisons and jails. Psychopathy and antisocial personality disorder are related but distinct concepts. Psychopathy is an old construct that focuses on personality traits such as affective and interpersonal aspects, while antisocial personality disorder describes criminal behaviors. In males, psychopathy is characterized by narcissism, while in females, it's more commonly associated with borderline and histrionic personality disorders. A malignant narcissist is a specific type of individual who exhibits both narcissistic and antisocial personality traits. It's important to note that not all narcissists are antisocials, but when these two traits are combined, it can result in dangerous and harmful behavior.

    • Understanding the Differences Between Psychopathy and Antisocial Personality DisorderPsychopathy is a severe form of antisocial personality disorder, characterized by manipulation, lack of empathy, and superficial charm. Approximately 20-25% of prisoners exhibit psychopathic traits, and it's prevalent in certain professions. Biases and thinking errors can impact research and assessments of female psychopathy.

      Psychopathy is a subset of antisocial personality disorder, and approximately 20-25% of prisoners exhibit psychopathic traits, compared to a larger percentage of antisocial personality disordered individuals. The distinction between the two lies in the severity of symptoms, with psychopaths demonstrating a greater degree of manipulation, lack of empathy, and superficial charm. While successful psychopaths may not break the law, antisocial individuals may not always do so either. Research suggests a higher prevalence of psychopathy in certain professions, such as Wall Street and executive roles, but the exact percentages are not yet known. It's essential to recognize and address various biases and thinking errors when studying and understanding female psychopathy, as these can significantly impact research and clinical assessments. Some common biases include the halo effect, confirmation bias, and the availability heuristic. These biases can lead to inaccurate assumptions and misinterpretations of data.

    • Misunderstanding and misdiagnosis of psychopathy in femalesConfirmation bias and the psychologist fallacy can lead to overlooking differences in how psychopathy presents in females, who may exhibit more coy, seductive, and victimized behaviors, rather than overtly callous and narcissistic.

      The way psychopathy is diagnosed and understood can lead to misunderstanding and misdiagnosis, particularly when it comes to assessing and diagnosing females. Confirmation bias, or focusing only on data that supports a preconceived theory, can result in overlooking important differences in how psychopathy presents in females. The psychologist fallacy, or assuming that females will present in the same way as the male prototype, can lead to missing crucial signs. Females may present as more coy, seductive, and victimized, rather than overtly callous and narcissistic. The Psychopathy Checklist, developed by Bob Hare, is a widely used tool for diagnosing psychopathy. It is reliable and has been useful in research, but it is important to remember that it may not capture the full complexity of how psychopathy presents in females. When assessing or treating female offenders, a different approach may be necessary, one that is sensitive to the unique ways that psychopathy can manifest in women.

    • Reliability of PCL-R interview method compared to self-report measuresThe PCL-R interview method is a more reliable and valid way to assess psychopathy due to file review and high inter-rater reliabilities, while self-report measures like the PPI and PCL:SR have lower reliability and validity.

      The Psychopathy Checklist-Revised (PCL-R) interview method is a more reliable and valid way to assess psychopathy compared to self-report measures like the Personality Psychopathy Inventory (PPI) or the Hare Psychopathy Checklist-Self Report (PCL:SR). This is because the PCL-R involves a file review before the interview, ensuring that the information gathered is corroborated and not just based on the interviewee's self-report. The inter-rater reliabilities for the PCL-R are extremely high, around 0.98, and the method has been used successfully across multiple generations of researchers. While most of the inter-rater reliability data was gathered through file review, it is still important for interviewers to challenge interviewees based on the information gathered during the file review, especially when it comes to items related to manipulation, lying, and poor behavioral controls. The PCL-R interview method is a crucial tool for accurately assessing psychopathy and understanding the unique characteristics and behaviors of this population.

    • Being aware of manipulative behaviors during interactionsClinicians must be observant and not easily swayed by stories or emotions to avoid being manipulated by patients in therapeutic contexts

      During interviews or interactions with individuals, it's important to be aware of their behavior and reactions. Some people may try to manipulate or deceive others to achieve their goals. The speaker shared an experience of being conned by a homeless person who presented a sad story multiple times to different people, including the speaker. This highlights the importance of being observant and not being easily swayed by stories or emotions. In a therapeutic context, it's crucial for clinicians to be vigilant and not be fooled by patients who may be trying to manipulate the situation for their benefit. The speaker also emphasized that it's not a matter of if a clinician will be fooled, but when. Therefore, education and awareness about such behaviors can help clinicians better navigate challenging patient interactions.

    • Subtle Behaviors of Female PsychopathsFemale psychopaths use charm, compliments, passive-aggression, and coy behavior to manipulate and deceive, making their manipulations harder to detect.

      Psychopathy, although often associated with overt charm and boastfulness in males, can present much more subtly in females. Psychopaths use superficial charm to manipulate and devalue others, often through compliments and passive-aggressive behavior. They also observe and exploit others' interests and vulnerabilities to gain favor. Female psychopaths may use their appearance and coy behavior to seduce and charm, making their manipulations more difficult to detect. Psychologists working with psychopaths need to be aware of these subtle behaviors and guard against being manipulated or isolated from their colleagues.

    • Building foundations and dealing with manipulations in interactions with psychopathsOlder female inmates advised younger ones about building foundations during initial interactions with mental health professionals. Be aware of manipulation tactics like aggressive devaluation, threats, and sexualization. Establish boundaries, maintain awareness of countertransference, and consult with colleagues to prevent falling prey to manipulations.

      Understanding the dynamics of interacting with individuals with psychopathic tendencies requires awareness and caution. Older female inmates advised younger ones about the importance of building a foundation during initial interactions with mental health professionals. However, when strategies fail to engage, malevolence may surface in the form of aggressive devaluation. A story was shared about an infamous psychopath who, upon being challenged, reacted with threats and a need for approval. Sexualization of staff is a common manipulation tactic used to gain favors. To prevent falling prey to such manipulations, psychologists must establish boundaries and maintain awareness of their countertransference, which can manifest as feeling threatened or sexualized. Collaboration and consultation with colleagues can help in stopping such behaviors. In a prison setting, where such behaviors are prevalent, staying vigilant and paying close attention to countertransference is crucial.

    • Psychopathy in males vs females: Different expressions of self-worthMales with psychopathy may display bravado, dominance, and contempt, while females may seek attention and be self-focused, but both lack insight into their shortcomings, hindering help-seeking and constructive feedback.

      Psychopathy, as described in the Hare Psychopathy Checklist, presents differently in males and females when it comes to the grandiose sense of self-worth. For males, it often manifests as bravado, dominance, and contempt for others, while females may exhibit a pathological self-focus, seeking attention and being the center of attraction, but with an underlying damaged self-image. The lack of insight into their own shortcomings is a common trait, making it challenging for them to seek help or accept constructive feedback. This lack of insight, as noted, can be observed even in cases of serious crimes and imprisonment. Overall, understanding these differences in presentation can aid in more effective assessment and intervention strategies.

    • Understanding the Differences in Male and Female PsychopathyMale and female psychopaths share self-focus, but manifestations differ: males exhibit overt grandiosity, while females use subtle manipulation, often involving sex and appearance.

      While both male and female psychopaths share an intense self-focus, the way it manifests is different. Male psychopaths often exhibit overt grandiosity and a lack of concern for how they're perceived, while female psychopaths tend to have a more subtle, self-absorbed presentation, often using their appearance and sex to manipulate others. Female psychopaths may also be less likely to admit to their manipulative behaviors due to societal norms and expectations. The conning and manipulation tactics of female psychopaths often involve using their sexuality and appearance to deceive and defraud, as well as drug dealing and other subtle schemes. Overall, understanding the nuanced differences between male and female psychopathy is crucial for effective diagnosis and treatment.

    • Approaching Emotions in Female CriminalsFemale criminals manipulate through subtle emotional means, masking true intentions. They seek emotional validation and mirroring, use pseudo dependency, and can be emotionally intelligent. Interviewers must adopt a supportive style and look beyond rationalizations to access truth.

      Understanding the complex emotional dynamics of female criminals requires a different approach compared to male criminals. Female criminals often manipulate through subtle means and use pseudo emotionality to mask their true intentions. They may present shallow, short-lived emotionality, which can be misconstrued as deep-rooted emotions. These women seek emotional validation and mirroring to fill an emptiness and regulate their own emotions. They may also use pseudo dependency to build up their sagging self-esteem. Female criminals can be exceptionally emotionally intelligent and manipulate others through their emotional intelligence. It's crucial for interviewers to adopt a supportive and nonjudgmental interview style and to look beyond rationalizations and excuses to access the truth.

    • Understanding Psychopaths' Manipulation TacticsPsychopaths use empathy and charm to gain trust, then reveal manipulative intentions. Female psychopaths feign remorse, while male psychopaths may be loners and express callousness overtly.

      Psychopaths are skilled manipulators who assess people quickly and give them what they believe they need to manipulate them. They use empathy and charm to gain trust before revealing their true intentions. Lack of remorse and empathy are common traits among psychopaths, but they express these traits differently between genders. Female psychopaths may feign remorse and guilt, but lack the in-depth understanding and emotional connection to their actions. Their callousness is more passive and verbal, such as gossiping or being passive-aggressive. Male psychopaths, on the other hand, may be loners and lack the need for affiliative attachments due to their callousness and lack of empathy. They may express their callousness overtly through harming animals or trashing property. Understanding these manipulation tactics and recognizing the subtle differences in how psychopaths express their lack of remorse and empathy can help in identifying and dealing with them.

    • Gender differences in psychopathy revealed through Rorschach dataMale psychopaths are less interpersonally dependent and exhibit fewer texture responses, while female psychopaths display higher interpersonal dependency and more texture responses, with a greater need for attention and emotional support.

      There are significant differences in the behavior and emotional responses of male and female psychopaths, as revealed in Rorschach data. Male psychopaths exhibit less interpersonal dependency and fewer texture responses, indicating detachment and an inability to form attachments. In contrast, female psychopaths display higher interpersonal dependency, with more texture responses and a greater need for attention and emotional support. This maladaptive neediness can manifest as a desire for acceptance and positive appraisal, even if it means feigning empathy or concern for others. These findings challenge the common perception of psychopathy as a uniform condition and highlight the importance of considering gender differences in understanding and treating this complex disorder.

    • Incarcerated women who have harmed their children may believe they're good mothers, but evidence suggests otherwiseIncarcerated women who commit heinous crimes against their children may believe they're good mothers, but evidence shows this is often a delusion reinforced by feedback from others. They may exhibit shallow affect, making it difficult to truly understand or express emotions.

      Incarcerated women who have committed heinous crimes against their children, such as sexual assault, often portray themselves as good mothers despite having little to no contact with their kids. This delusional belief is reinforced by feedback from fellow inmates and mental health professionals, who may mirror back positive images of motherhood. However, upon closer examination, there is often little evidence of this supposed maternal connection. These women may also exhibit shallow affect, meaning they have a limited range and depth of emotions, which can be confusing as they may appear to experience strong emotions but lack the ability to truly understand or express them. Psychopaths, both male and female, are skilled at manipulating others into projecting their desired emotions onto them, so it's important for professionals to be mindful of this dynamic when working with these individuals.

    • Understanding Narcissistic BehaviorsNarcissists distort reality, struggle with deep emotions, engage in parasitic behaviors, and may view their children as extensions of themselves.

      Narcissistic individuals, whether male or female, have a tendency to distort their perception of reality to maintain their ego and self-image. They may engage in shallow affect, meaning they have difficulty experiencing deep emotions and may lack genuine attachments to others. Additionally, they may exhibit parasitic behaviors, such as living off others' resources without contributing in return. Regarding sexual behavior, while males may endorse promiscuity with pride, both genders can display discomfort or reticence when discussing their sexual activities. Researchers have also found that narcissistic women may view their children as extensions of themselves and use them for narcissistic mirroring. It's essential to look beyond surface-level statements and examine the underlying behaviors to accurately assess narcissistic tendencies.

    • Understanding Female PsychopathyRecognize and understand differences in female psychopathy, approach with sensitivity, and be aware of potential biases.

      Assessing sexual behavior and prostitution history requires a sensitive and empathetic approach with females, as they may view these topics as criticisms and potential sources of trauma. Females may also display different types of behavioral problems, such as gossiping and ostracizing, which may not be as overtly recorded as male offenses. It's essential to understand that female psychopathy presents differently than male psychopathy. This discussion, as well as the book, emphasizes the importance of recognizing and understanding these differences when interacting with female offenders. Additionally, it's crucial to be aware of the potential biases that can influence perceptions and assessments of this population.

    • Understanding the Complexities of the Forensic PopulationDespite common beliefs, data doesn't necessarily support the notion that female offenders are being treated less severely than men. African American males are disproportionately likely to be incarcerated. Approaching this issue with an unbiased perspective and evidence-based decision-making is crucial.

      While there is a wealth of information available about the victimization of female offenders in the legal justice system, the data does not necessarily support the notion that they are being treated less severely than men. In fact, African American males are disproportionately likely to be incarcerated. It's crucial to approach this issue with an unbiased perspective based on facts rather than cultural beliefs. As a non-forensic psychologist, it's important for me to understand this dynamic to avoid falling into the trap of wanting to believe and support the image that offenders may present. The conversation between the experts provides valuable insights into the complexities of the forensic population and the importance of evidence-based decision-making. Conflicts of interest were discussed, and no such conflicts were disclosed beyond the sale of a book. The conversation was enlightening, and if listeners are interested in learning more, a discount code for the related book will be made available on the Psychiatry Podcast resource library.

    Recent Episodes from Psychiatry & Psychotherapy Podcast

    Reflective Functioning: The Key to Attachment with Dr. Howard Steele

    Reflective Functioning: The Key to Attachment with Dr. Howard Steele

    In this episode, we discuss “reflective function,” which is a precursor to the concept of mentalization. Reflective function is best understood not as synonymous with mentalization, but as a scale from -1 to 9, based off certain adult attachment interview questions that measure the person’s ability to describe their own and others’ internal states, motivations, and articulate a nuanced and unique understanding of life from 0 to 12 years old. This scale was developed by attachment researchers at the University of London, including Dr. Howard Steele and Dr. Peter Fonagy.

    Bruce Perry on the Healing Power of Human Connection and Resilience in Trauma

    Bruce Perry on the Healing Power of Human Connection and Resilience in Trauma

    In today’s episode, we talk with Dr. Bruce Perry who co-authored, The Boy Who Was Raised As A Dog, Born For Love: Why Empathy is Essential and Endangered, and What Happened to You? Conversations on Trauma, Resilience, and Healing (2021). We are also joined by Megan White Zappitelli, M.D., a child and adolescent psychiatrist, and Maddison Hussey, M.D., a child and adolescent fellow. 

    Early Psychosis: Detection and Treatment

    Early Psychosis: Detection and Treatment

    In this episode, we are joined by a panel of experts to discuss treatment of psychosis. Experiences of psychosis are common. When these experiences lead to interference in achieving life goals and/or distress, individuals can benefit from seeking evidenced-based care. The earlier individuals experiencing psychosis come to treatment, the better the outcomes. We are all allies in connecting these young people to care and services. Recovery is possible—people living with psychosis experiences can lead full, meaningful, and fulfilling lives. 

    Q&A with Dr. Michael Cummings

    Q&A with Dr. Michael Cummings

    In this episode, we welcome back fan favorite Dr. Michael Cummings and ask questions sent in by listeners. Topics include Schizophrenia, Social Media Trends, and the SSRI controversy. We are thrilled to dedicate an episode that allows individuals to ask pointed questions and glean from Dr. Cummings' expertise. 

    What People Want From Therapy with Linda Michaels

    What People Want From Therapy with Linda Michaels

    Therapies of depth, insight, and relationship have been missing from, if not pushed out of, the public conversation on mental health treatment. After decades of attack from multiple fronts, these therapies are misunderstood, undervalued, and overlooked by the general public. In order to address this challenge and change this trajectory, we must start by listening to the public and understand their needs, values, and preferences about therapy. Dr. Linda Michaels and colleagues conducted an extensive research project, leveraging qualitative and quantitative tools and techniques widely used in the corporate world, focused on “listening” to the public and understanding what people want and need from therapy. 

    Linda Michaels, PsyD, MBA, is a clinical psychologist in private practice in Chicago. She is also chair and co-founder of the Psychotherapy Action Network (PsiAN), a non-profit that advocates for quality therapy. 

    Link to blog here.

    5 Factors and Domains of Psychiatric Care

    5 Factors and Domains of Psychiatric Care

    In this Episode, Dr. David Puder, Dr. Adam Borecky, and Joanie Burns discuss the 5-factor approach to holistic, patient-centered psychiatric care. This approach takes into account that each individual who seeks care is unique in their physiological and psychological make-up and that multiple factors influence both physical and mental health (for better or worse). 

    The 5-factor approach to treatment is based on the importance of sensorium and its pivotal role in regulating thoughts, feelings, and overall mental health. Sensorium is a lens to understand how we focus on various things. Sensorium is total brain function, which fluctuates throughout the day and depends on a number of factors, including sleep, stress levels, and more.

    Mentalization Based Therapy (MBT), with Dr. Anthony W. Bateman, MA, FRCPSYCH and Dr. Peter Fonagy, Ph.D., FBA

    Mentalization Based Therapy (MBT), with Dr. Anthony W. Bateman, MA, FRCPSYCH and Dr. Peter Fonagy, Ph.D., FBA

    In this episode, we are joined by Dr. Anthony W. Bateman and Dr. Peter Fonagy to discuss their expertise on Mentalization. 

    Mentalization refers to the capacity to reflect upon and understand one's own state of mind and the states of mind of others.  This involves recognizing and making sense of one's own and others’ emotions, beliefs, needs and desires.  People use this tool consciously and unconsciously to make sense of others and themselves. Often done automatically, a person may form beliefs about the people they interact with, making assumptions about their mental states. These beliefs tend to have a strong influence on the mental state of the person, whether or not they are correct.

     

    Beginning the Treatment with Jonathan Shedler, PhD

    Beginning the Treatment with Jonathan Shedler, PhD

    Dr. Jonathan Shedler is well known for his work on the efficacy of psychodynamic therapy. He has highlighted the importance of the initial phase of therapy in establishing a foundation for successful treatment. Dr. Shedler strongly believes the consultation phase is crucial to developing a working alliance between client and therapist and building a treatment frame and structure. Without this foundation, there is no mutual understanding about the goal or the purpose of treatment, and psychotherapy should not move forward. Join us in this episode as Dr. Shelder discusses how to create a firm starting foundation in clinical practice.

    Adverse Childhood Experiences Part 2: Measurement, Impact on Future Mental Health, Dissociation, and Timing of Trauma

    Adverse Childhood Experiences Part 2: Measurement, Impact on Future Mental Health, Dissociation, and Timing of Trauma

    In this week’s episode of the podcast, we will continue our discussion regarding adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and their influence on the development of future mental health disorders. The greatest predictive factor of the relationship between ACEs and future mental health disorders has to do with the severity, duration, and number of traumatic events. We’ll explore the Childhood Trauma Questionnaire and the data of how ACEs increase the risk of certain personality disorders and psychiatric conditions.

    Link to blog: 

    https://www.psychiatrypodcast.com/psychiatry-psychotherapy-podcast/episode-204-adverse-childhood-experiences-part-2-measurement-impact-on-future-mental-health-dissociation-and-timing-of-trauma

    Related Episodes

    Interview on Psychopathy with Expert Carl Bruce Gacono, Ph.D., ABAP

    Interview on Psychopathy with Expert Carl Bruce Gacono, Ph.D., ABAP

    In this episode, I interviewed Carl B. Gacono, PhD, who is an expert in the areas of criminal psychopathology, behavior, and treatment. We dive into understanding and acknowledging the distinct differences between psychopathic and non-psychopathic patients and how their assessment with the PCL-R and Rorschach aid in their management and treatment. We also discuss how understanding transference and countertransference is essential when interacting with these difficult patients.

    Link to Blog.

    Link to Resource Library. 

    Borderline Personality Disorder: History, Symptoms, Environment, Genetics & Brain Science

    Borderline Personality Disorder: History, Symptoms, Environment, Genetics & Brain Science

    In this episode of the podcast, we introduce borderline personality disorder (BPD). We discuss its history, nomenclature, epidemiology, etiology, and diagnosis while providing perspectives from clinicians regarding the treatment of individuals with BPD.

    Link to Blog.

    Link to Resource Library. 

    Book Club: Marcus Aurelius’ "Meditations"

    Book Club: Marcus Aurelius’ "Meditations"

    In this episode, we will be discussing some themes observed in Meditations, a collection of notebooks written by the 16th Roman emperor, Marcus Aurelius, during the last years of his reign. His writings are still relevant to us and resonate within us, as the emperor himself struggled with some core questions that anyone who is living this thing called life might ponder.

    Link to Blog.

    Link to Resource Library. 

    Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

    Obsessive Compulsive Disorder (OCD)

    In this episode, I am joined once again by Michael Cummings. M.D. and Melissa Pereau, M.D. along with Chantel Fletcher who will soon be a fourth year medical student going into Psychiatry. We will be doing an in-depth analysis on Obsessive Compulsive Disorder including history, assessments, diagnosis, and so much more. 

    Link to Blog.

    Link to Resource Library. 

    Book Club: Viktor Frankl’s “Man’s Search For Meaning”

    Book Club: Viktor Frankl’s “Man’s Search For Meaning”

    In this episode, we will be going over a book every therapist and psychiatrist should read, Viktor Frankl’s “Man’s Search for Meaning.” Being in the trenches with our patients, we see so much pain and suffering and potentially undergo vicarious trauma ourselves through their suffering. The question, “What is the meaning of life?” often comes up in such a context.

    Link to Blog.

    Link to Resource Library.