Logo
    Search

    JD Vance: the reluctant interpreter of Trumpism

    enJanuary 24, 2017

    Podcast Summary

    • Exploring the World with Wise, Insights from the Ezra Klein Show, and the Wisdom of Hillbilly ElegyWise simplifies international transactions with real-time exchange rates and no hidden fees, the Ezra Klein Show offers insightful discussions on societal and political issues, and Hillbilly Elegy provides a deep analysis of social mobility and community challenges.

      Wise provides a convenient and cost-effective solution for managing and converting currencies for international transactions. With real-time mid-market exchange rates and no hidden fees, it eliminates the need for airport currency exchanges and offers a more straightforward way to send and spend money globally. Meanwhile, the Ezra Klein Show podcast offers insights into various societal and political issues through in-depth conversations with experts, making it a valuable resource for those interested in understanding complex topics. JD Vance's book, Hillbilly Elegy, serves as a thought-provoking analysis of social mobility, identity politics, and the challenges faced by specific communities. These three offerings—Wise, the Ezra Klein Show, and Hillbilly Elegy—each contribute to making our world a little wiser and more connected.

    • Author's personal experiences shape explosive book receptionSharing personal stories can resonate unexpectedly with others, leading to societal impact and vulnerability for the author.

      The author's personal experiences, which he initially wanted to keep private, became a crucial part of his book due to external pressures and the larger societal context. The book, which delves into his family's struggles with addiction and other personal issues, received an explosive reception, leading to awkward encounters and a newfound sense of vulnerability for the author. He coped with the attention by involving his family in the writing process and finding humor in the situation. The unexpected political momentum, fueled by endorsements from Republican senators, added to the book's reach and impact. Overall, the author's journey highlights the power of sharing personal stories and the unexpected ways they can resonate with others.

    • Understanding the struggles of Appalachian life and the need for empathy and communityJ.D. Vance's book 'Hillbilly Elegy' highlights the complex realities of Appalachian life and emphasizes the importance of empathy and community in addressing the struggles faced by lower income kids, while also acknowledging the potential role of policy solutions.

      J.D. Vance's book, "Hillbilly Elegy," gained significant attention during a politically charged moment in American history, thanks in part to a viral social media interview and the economic and social frustrations of the white working class. The book's exploration of the struggles faced by lower income kids resonated with many, leading some to view it as an explanation for the Trump phenomenon. However, Vance hopes that the core message of the book, which is to understand the cultural dimensions of hardship and the need for empathy and community, will be its lasting impact. Despite some misconceptions, Vance believes that policy solutions can help address some of these issues, but only if policymakers truly understand the problems at hand. Ultimately, "Hillbilly Elegy" is a diagnostic tool, shedding light on the complex realities of Appalachian life and the importance of empathy and resilience.

    • Understanding the resentment towards social programsThe author emphasizes the importance of acknowledging the social distrust towards social programs among different classes, particularly the working and middle class, and how it's not just a racial issue but a class issue.

      The author's argument in the book goes beyond a critique of American trade policy or economic policies of past presidents. Instead, it offers a diagnostic perspective on the impact of industrial economy decline on people's lives. The author emphasizes the importance of understanding the resentment among different classes, particularly the working class and middle class, towards social programs. This resentment, as the author explains, is not just a racial issue but a class issue. The author's point is not to criticize or defend social welfare programs but to acknowledge the social distrust that arises when these programs are perceived to be misused. The author's personal experience in her community illustrates this point, and it's an essential aspect of understanding the political shift in the white working class over the past few decades.

    • Perception of unequal distribution of benefits in ObamacareRecognizing that large-scale health reforms involve winners and losers, it's crucial to address concerns of those already insured to maintain overall support for the reform

      During the implementation of Obamacare, many middle and lower middle income Americans felt resentful towards those on Medicaid who seemed to receive more generous coverage with lower costs. This perception of unequal distribution of benefits fueled a sense of unfairness, which contributed to the negative perception of Obamacare among these groups. The failure to adequately address these concerns may have significantly impacted the public discourse surrounding the law. It's essential to recognize that large-scale health reforms inevitably involve winners and losers. However, if the focus is on extending coverage to the uninsured, it may be perceived as detrimental to those already insured, potentially undermining the overall support for the reform.

    • Political tensions over the ACA and its implementationDespite the ACA's focus on expanding health care coverage, political tensions between Democrats and Republicans continue to impact its implementation and public perception.

      The passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) was a contentious process marked by political tensions between the two major parties. While Democrats wanted to provide more subsidies to a wider range of income levels, Republicans were unwilling to do so, leading to a focus on helping those with lower incomes. However, the perception that Democrats "own" the health care system due to Republican opposition remains a challenge for the Democratic Party. Trump's entry into the political scene offered a potential third way, focusing on the welfare state while also addressing perceived issues of immigration and inner cities. The meaning of Trump's stance on these issues is contested, with some seeing it as tapping into non-racial resentment and others viewing it as fueled by race and immigration concerns. Ultimately, the ACA's implementation and the ongoing political debates surrounding it highlight the complexities of health care policy and the role of political dynamics in shaping the welfare state.

    • Understanding Trump's presidency through the lens of jobs and economic opportunitiesTrump tapped into feelings of being left behind and frustration with the political establishment, framing issues as jobs vs elites, and effectively creating a sense of 'us' vs 'them'.

      Donald Trump's presidency can be understood as identifying and naming a problem that resonated deeply with a significant portion of the American electorate. Trump tapped into feelings of being left behind and frustration with the political establishment, framing the issue as one of jobs and economic opportunities for the working class against the elites. Immigration was also framed as a jobs issue, with the perceived threat coming from the elites who were seen as colluding to create a multicultural America at the expense of the working class. Trump effectively created a sense of "us" versus "them," with "them" being the elites, and this message was a powerful and effective one for many voters. Despite personal connections and relationships that might suggest otherwise, the data and the way people interpreted it played a significant role in Trump's electoral success.

    • Why some Trump voters support him despite controversial policies towards immigrantsBelief in Trump's ability to 'fix the system' allows some voters to reinterpret controversial policies, but the Trump phenomenon is complex and multifaceted, involving both substance and process elements.

      The reasons why some Trump voters support him despite his controversial policies towards immigrants, such as deportation, can be explained by their belief that he will "fix the system." This perspective allows them to reinterpret Trump's explicit messages in a way that aligns with their values, and it's a position that requires a certain level of risk tolerance. However, the complexity of the Trump phenomenon goes beyond this, as people's interpretations of his words and actions vary, and not everyone who voted for him held the same beliefs or tolerated the same level of controversy. The substance and process elements of Trump's campaign, including his policies and his criticism of the elites, also played a significant role in his appeal to voters. Overall, understanding the Trump phenomenon requires recognizing the nuanced and multifaceted reasons behind his support.

    • Trump's appeal: Unconventional ideas and confrontational styleTrump's unconventional ideas and confrontational style resonated with voters disconnected from the political establishment, tapping into a sentiment against perceived elitism and self-interest of the political class.

      Donald Trump's popularity during his presidency can be attributed to both his unconventional ideas and his confrontational style. His willingness to challenge political norms and his ability to expose the workings of government, despite being criticized for it, resonated with many voters who felt disconnected from the political establishment. Additionally, Trump's portrayal of himself as an agent of change and his promise to fight for the interests of the American people, even if it meant embracing negative stereotypes about the global elite, struck a chord with those who felt they had been left behind. Ultimately, Trump's appeal can be understood as a reaction against the perceived elitism and self-interest of the political class, and his ability to tap into this sentiment helped propel him to victory.

    • Trump's call against self-defeatist attitudes in economyTrump's appeal lies in validating feelings of helplessness and resentment towards economic power, even if promises may not deliver

      Donald Trump's political philosophy can be seen as a clarion call against the self-defeatist attitudes prevalent in those feeling hopeless and powerless in the economy. Trump's perceived mastery over economic power, despite being a caricature, offers comfort to those most resentful of the upper middle class rather than the wealthy. The resentment towards economic power isn't solely about money but also about education and social standing. The discussion also highlighted the power of feelings of helplessness and the potential for political figures to tap into these emotions. Trump's appeal lies in his ability to explain and validate these feelings, even if his promises may not deliver on their promises. The conversation also touched upon the importance of understanding resentments towards economic power in the context of how people actually experience it.

    • Trump's appeal to white working-class voters based on cultural and class-related resentmentsTrump's perceived tackiness and anger towards cultural elites resonated with many white working-class voters, contributing to his victory in states with heavy white working-class populations.

      During the 2016 election, cultural and class-related resentments played a significant role in Trump's appeal, particularly among certain groups like those with Scots Irish descent. Trump's perceived tackiness and anger towards cultural elites resonated with many voters, creating a sharp divide between those who identified with him and those who didn't. This aesthetic revulsion, combined with economic struggles and feelings of being overlooked, contributed to Trump's victory in states with heavy white working-class populations. The conversation around white privilege and disadvantages also highlights the importance of acknowledging the complexities within different racial and ethnic groups, as not all experiences are the same. Trump's ability to tap into these cultural and class-related resentments, and the resulting battle lines drawn, gave people a sense of belonging and a license to join his cause.

    • Expanding our understanding of privilege and disadvantageTo foster productive conversations and create opportunities for all, it's essential to recognize the multifaceted nature of privilege and disadvantage, including race, class, education, and childhood trauma, and expand our vocabulary to foster nuanced discussions.

      The discussion around racial privilege and disadvantage in society can be overly simplistic, leading to misunderstandings and resentment among certain groups. Working class whites, for instance, may feel overlooked and disconnected from the public discourse, despite facing their own challenges. The issue of privilege and disadvantage is multifaceted and operates along various dimensions, including race, class, education, and childhood trauma. It's crucial to expand our vocabulary and understanding of these complex issues to foster more productive conversations and create opportunities for all. The lack of nuance in public discourse can make it harder for individuals to recognize and address the disadvantages faced by others, ultimately hindering progress towards greater equality.

    • Understanding the complexities of marginalized communities and the white working classTo foster productive conversations and progress, it's crucial to offer sympathetic but hard-nosed looks at both marginalized communities and the white working class, focusing on understanding the root causes of their struggles.

      Both understanding and criticism are necessary when discussing issues affecting marginalized communities and the white working class. Sympathy without judgment can be condescending and unhelpful, while judgment without understanding can perpetuate destructive stereotypes. To move forward, it's crucial to offer sympathetic but hard-nosed looks at both communities, focusing on understanding the root causes of their struggles. This approach can help foster productive conversations and ultimately lead to meaningful progress. The wealth gap, cultural anxiety, and economic struggles are just a few of the complex issues that require a nuanced understanding, rather than simplistic judgments.

    • Understanding Complex Issues Beyond EconomicsRecognize the importance of social, cultural, and personal factors in shaping complex issues and communicate empathy to bridge the gap between experts and communities.

      The complex issues facing communities today, such as opioid addiction, family breakdown, and social disconnection, are not just economic problems. These issues are interconnected and multifaceted, affecting people's perceptions of their lives and future prospects. The dominance of technocratic and libertarian discourse in public sphere makes it challenging to discuss these issues in a holistic way. The book "Hillary Clinton's America" highlights this challenge, as Clinton, despite her deep understanding of these issues, was unable to effectively communicate her empathy and on-your-side attitude to voters. Technocrats, including the author herself, strive to understand these issues, but their attempts to translate them into scientific language can sometimes come across as detached. It's crucial to recognize the importance of social and cultural capital, religion, childhood trauma, and family instability in shaping people's lives and opportunities. Engaging with these issues in a non-economic way can help bridge the gap between experts and the communities they aim to help.

    • Politicians must connect with voters on the groundPoliticians need to demonstrate deep sympathy and make human connections beyond policy plans to bridge the divide between opposing sides.

      Political leaders, including those like Hillary Clinton, need to make a genuine effort to connect with voters on the ground, especially in areas where they are suffering from critical issues like the opioid crisis. Merely caring about these issues intellectually or emotionally is not enough. The geographic segregation of political ideologies in our country makes it challenging for politicians from one side to convince voters from the other that they genuinely care about their problems. Political leaders who fail to spend time in areas where their opponents are popular risk driving a deeper wedge between the two sides. To bridge this divide, politicians must demonstrate a deep sympathy for the conflicts that feel core to people's lives and make a human connection that goes beyond policy plans. Unfortunately, the way upper-middle-class elites live, work, and educate themselves is driving this wedge further apart.

    • The growing divide between elites and othersThe obsession with credentials among elites can create a disconnect with those in other social strata, leading to a growing divide that requires attention and understanding.

      The growing divide between different social strata and their value sets is becoming a significant problem in society. The elites and those in the broad middle seem to have lost emotional connection with each other, and this gap is increasing. This issue is not new, but it's becoming more pronounced. The author, who has experienced this divide firsthand, shares that the expectations, lifestyle, and values of the elites can be vastly different from those in other social strata. The elites place significant importance on their jobs, credentials, and education, which can lead to a sense of worth and esteem. However, this obsession with credentialing can be jarring to those who view their jobs as a means to an end. The author believes that both value sets have merit – it's essential to value one's work and find meaning in it, but it's also important not to overemphasize credentials. This divide is a complex issue that requires attention and understanding to bridge the gap.

    • The Dangers of Elitism in EducationElitism in education can lead to feelings of alienation and microaggressions, discouraging genuine understanding and equality.

      The obsession with credentials and elite education can be self-destructive and lead to feelings of alienation, particularly for those from non-privileged backgrounds. The speaker shares his personal experience of growing up as the son of an immigrant and struggling in school, contrasting this with the current preoccupation among parents for their children to attend prestigious universities. He also discusses the issue of microaggressions, or subtle but insidious forms of discrimination, which he encountered in his own life and how they can impact individuals, despite the urge to brush them off. Ultimately, the speaker encourages acknowledging and addressing these experiences to promote greater understanding and equality.

    • Understanding unique experiences of different communities is essential but can be overwhelmingEncourage those with more privilege to share the burden and be more mindful to create inclusive spaces, reducing exhaustion for marginalized communities and promoting a more equitable society.

      Recognizing the unfamiliarity of one's environment can be both enlightening and self-defeating. While understanding the unique experiences of different communities is essential for effective policy-making, constantly acknowledging the challenges faced by marginalized groups can be overwhelming. The burden of navigating these complexities should not solely rest on those who are already disadvantaged. Instead, it's crucial to share the burden and encourage those with more privilege to be more mindful of their language and actions to create inclusive spaces. This not only reduces the exhaustion level for marginalized communities but also promotes a more equitable society. However, it's important to recognize that complete cultural harmony may not be achievable, and there will always be some degree of disconnect. Nevertheless, ongoing efforts to bridge the gap and create a more inclusive environment are essential.

    • Balancing structural change and mental toughness for social mobilityTo tackle social mobility effectively, we must address structural barriers while fostering mental toughness and self-reliance in individuals from disadvantaged backgrounds.

      It's crucial to address the structural barriers to social mobility while also instilling a sense of mental toughness and self-reliance in individuals coming from disadvantaged backgrounds. The conversation around microaggressions is important, but it should not come at the expense of mental fortitude. Policymakers and privileged individuals have a responsibility to advocate for change and provide support, but it's equally important for those from disadvantaged backgrounds to believe in their ability to make a difference through their choices. This delicate balance is essential for effectively addressing the complex issue of social mobility.

    • Expanding Perspectives, Defying LimitsReading diverse voices broadens perspectives, challenges beliefs, and expands understanding of the world. Recommended reads include 'The Truly Disadvantaged', 'Coming Apart', and 'The English and Their History'.

      People may feel disempowered and limited in their choices, but it's important to remember that the possibilities are wider than most people think. Grandma's advice to accept the world's unfairness and be motivated by it instead of being defeated by it is a valuable perspective. To broaden our perspectives and challenge our beliefs, it's essential to read and engage with diverse voices, even if they don't align with our views. Some recommended reads include "The Truly Disadvantaged" by William Julius Wilson, "Coming Apart" by Charles Murray, and "The English and Their History" by Robert Tombs. By exposing ourselves to new ideas and perspectives, we can expand our understanding of the world and make a positive impact on our communities.

    Recent Episodes from The Gray Area with Sean Illing

    1992: The year politics broke

    1992: The year politics broke
    We’re living in an era of extreme partisan politics, rising resentment, and fractured news media. Writer John Ganz believes that we can trace the dysfunction to the 1990s, when right-wing populists like Pat Buchanan and white supremacist David Duke transformed Republican politics. He joins Sean to talk about the 1990s and how it laid the groundwork for Trump. His book is When the Clock Broke: Con Men, Conspiracists, and How America Cracked Up in the Early 1990s. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: John Ganz (@lionel_trolling). His book is When the Clock Broke.  Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The existential freedom of Blackness

    The existential freedom of Blackness
    Nathalie Etoke joins The Gray Area to talk about existentialism, the Black experience, and the legacy of dehumanization.  Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Nathalie Etoke. Her book is Black Existential Freedom. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The world after nuclear war

    The world after nuclear war
    A mile of pure fire. A flash that melts everything — titanium, steel, lead, people. A blast that mows down every structure in its path, 3 miles out in every direction. Journalist Annie Jacobsen spent years interviewing scientists, high-ranking military officials, politicians, and other experts to find out how a nuclear attack would be triggered, the devastation it would cause, the ruptures it would create in the social fabric, and how likely it is to happen today. She wrote about all of this in her new book Nuclear War: A Scenario. Jacobsen spends the hour clearly laying out the horrifying yet captivating specifics for Sean, and the prospects for avoiding catastrophe.  Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Annie Jacobsen. Her book is Nuclear War: A Scenario Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Gaza, Camus, and the logic of violence

    Gaza, Camus, and the logic of violence
    Albert Camus was a Nobel-winning French writer and public intellectual. During Algeria’s bloody war for independence in the 1950s, Camus took a measured stance, calling for an end to the atrocities on each side. He was criticized widely for his so-called “moderation.” Philosophy professor Robert Zaretsky joins Sean to discuss Camus’s thoughts on that conflict and the parallels with the present moment. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Robert Zaretsky Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    This is your kid on smartphones

    This is your kid on smartphones
    Old people have always worried about young people. But psychologist Jonathan Haidt believes something genuinely different and troubling is happening right now. He argues that smartphones and social media have had disastrous effects on the mental health of young people, and derailed childhood from real world play to touchscreens. He joins Sean to talk about his research and some of the criticisms of it. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Jonathan Haidt (@jonhaidt). His book is The Anxious Generation. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Life after death?

    Life after death?
    Sebastian Junger came as close as you possibly can to dying. While his doctors struggled to revive him, the veteran reporter and avowed rationalist experienced things that shocked and shook him, leaving him with profound questions and unexpected revelations. In his new book, In My Time of Dying, Junger explores the mysteries and commonalities of people’s near death experiences. He joins Sean to talk about what it’s like to die and what quantum physics can tell us about living that countless religions can’t. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Sebastian Junger. His new book is In My Time of Dying. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The world after Ozempic

    The world after Ozempic
    Ozempic and other new weight loss drugs are being touted as potential miracle cures for diabetes and obesity. Journalist Johann Hari experimented with the drug and dropped 40 pounds. In his new book, Magic Pill, Hari discusses his experience with Ozempic and speaks to many of the leading scientists to better understand how the drug works. He joins Sean to talk about what he’s learned and the complicated trade-offs involved in the decision to take these drugs. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Johann Hari (@johannhari101). His new book is Magic Pill. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Cristian Ayala Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    UFOs, God, and the edge of understanding

    UFOs, God, and the edge of understanding
    Religious studies professor Diana Pasulka was a total nonbeliever in alien life, but she began to question this after speaking with many people who claim to have had otherworldly encounters. She also noticed how these accounts parallel the foundational texts of many religions. She has since written two books on the topic, the most recent of which is Encounters: Experiences with Nonhuman Intelligences. She joins Sean to talk about extraterrestrial life, God, angels, and the renewed interest in UFOs.  Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Diana Pasulka (@dwpasulka). Her new book is Encounters: Experiences with Nonhuman Intelligences. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    How to listen

    How to listen
    Most of us don’t know how to truly listen, and it’s causing all sorts of problems. Sean Illing is joined by journalist Kate Murphy, the author of You’re Not Listening: What You’re Missing and Why It Matters, to discuss what it means to be a good listener, the problems that are caused when we don’t listen to each other, and the positive impacts on our health when we do. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Kate Murphy, author of You’re Not Listening: What You’re Missing and Why It Matters Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Subscribe for free. Be the first to hear the next episode of The Gray Area. Subscribe in your favorite podcast app. Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey This episode was made by:  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Editorial Director, Vox Talk: A.M. Hall Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Everything's a cult now

    Everything's a cult now
    The internet has fractured our world into a million little subcultures catering to the specific identities and habits of everyone online. Writer Derek Thompson believes this has led to a widespread cult-like mentality that has crept into all facets of modern life — pop culture, media, politics, and religion itself. He joins Sean to explain this theory, and why it’s maybe not such a bad thing. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Derek Thompson (@dkthomp). His podcast is Plain English, and he writes for The Atlantic. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    Ep 325 - Problem Solving Through Empathy: Roman Krznaric

    Ep 325 - Problem Solving Through Empathy: Roman Krznaric

    Roman Krznaric teaches philosophy at Oxford. He studies empathy and how it can be applied to everyday life. Sunzi says “Know the other and know yourself, and you will not see peril in any battle.” Bryan and Hunter draw the connections between markets, soldiers, and the power of Bryan Callen to save the world. Roman's new book is called Carpe Diem. Buy it through our Amazon affiliate!

    Visit our website at https://mixedmentalarts.online

    Use our Amazon affiliate!
    Use our Audible affiliate!
    Give us money on Patreon! https://www.patreon.com/mixedmentalarts
    Follow us on all the social media!

     

    #7 We Can All Do Better

    #7 We Can All Do Better

    I was planning on releasing an episode from another amazing guest but given recent events, I think it’s an important time to stop and reflect about a new era that we have well and truly entered. This is an episode about tolerance and finding common ground to overcome some of the biggest problems the world is facing. These thoughts have been weighing heavy on my mind for a few years now, but over the past few months I’ve been putting it altogether. Challenging my beliefs and assumptions. Although many of us are genuinely concerned with the direction the world is heading in, I believe that we can all do more. We can all do better. I was honestly a bit nervous about releasing this episode, because I don’t want to sound like I’m coming to the defence, or attacking any certain type of person. I am not discrediting real experiences or feelings from people either. I also don’t want to come across as preachy. My aim is to open up dialogue and challenge you to think further about your role, whatever your opinion is, and how you can do better. The purpose of this podcast is not only about doing good and hearing about different ways to do good. But it’s also about challenging misconceptions and challenging beliefs, ideas and assumptions. It’s open having open discussion and critique in a supportive community that cares about a sustainable future for every being. The fact that I even feel the need to preface this episode with that little disclaimer means that I am anxious about the response that it’s going to get, even though the whole point is to open dialogue. How ironic is that! Despite my anxiety, I’d love to hear your thoughts and ideas, so long as they’re constructive.

    114. Question Time: Banks in crisis, Imran Khan, and Blair on The Simpsons

    114. Question Time: Banks in crisis, Imran Khan, and Blair on The Simpsons
    Could Labour inherit a junior doctor problem? What can be done about the rising costs of childcare? And what do Rory and Alastair really see in each other? Rory and Alastair answer all these questions and more in this week’s Question Time. TRIP Plus: Become a member of The Rest Is Politics Plus to support the podcast, enjoy ad-free listening to both TRIP and Leading, benefit from discount book prices on titles mentioned on the pod, join our Discord chatroom, and receive early access to live show tickets and Question Time episodes. Just head to therestispolitics.com to sign up. Instagram: @restispolitics Twitter: @RestIsPolitics Email: restispolitics@gmail.com Producers: Dom Johnson + Nicole Maslen Exec Producers: Tony Pastor + Jack Davenport Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Breaking Points LIVE FROM NEW YORK featuring Kyle Kulinski & Marshall Kosloff!

    Breaking Points LIVE FROM NEW YORK featuring Kyle Kulinski & Marshall Kosloff!

    Krystal and Saagar go live from New York with Kyle Kulinski and Marshall Kosloff to talk about Elon's Twitter offer, housing market, the lost healthcare debate, energy policy, geopolitical realignment, and labor activism!


    To become a Breaking Points Premium Member and watch/listen to the show uncut and 1 hour early visit: https://breakingpoints.supercast.com/


    To listen to Breaking Points as a podcast, check them out on Apple and Spotify


    Apple: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/breaking-points-with-krystal-and-saagar/id1570045623 


    Spotify: https://open.spotify.com/show/4Kbsy61zJSzPxNZZ3PKbXl 


    Merch: https://breaking-points.myshopify.com/

    Learn more about your ad choices. Visit megaphone.fm/adchoices

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.