Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Building positive communities and being mindful of languageEngage in positive community activities, use mindful language, and prevent harmful stereotypes to promote understanding and prevent potential harm.

      Community building and social connections are essential for personal growth and preparedness, as highlighted by Neighbor to Neighbor. At the same time, it's crucial to be aware of the potential for harmful rhetoric and its potential consequences, as discussed in the Behind the Bastards podcast regarding the transgender community and the dangers of eliminationist language. The first stages of genocide, as identified by Gregory Stanton, involve classification and symbolization, which can lead to further harm if left unchecked. Engaging in positive community activities, like volunteering with Neighbor to Neighbor, and being mindful of the language we use can help promote understanding and prevent harmful stereotypes. Additionally, supporting causes like the Portland Diaper Bank can make a significant difference in people's lives. Overall, it's essential to strive for connection, empathy, and understanding in our communities while being vigilant against harmful rhetoric and actions.

    • Genocide's Complex ProcessGenocides don't follow a predictable linear progression through stages, but involve dynamic and overlapping elements like discrimination, dehumanization, organization, and polarization.

      Genocide is a complex process driven by various factors, not a simple linear progression through stages. The discussion touched upon discrimination, dehumanization, organization, and polarization, but it's important to remember that these elements can occur in different orders and at varying degrees in different genocidal situations. Stanton's 10 stages model, while useful for understanding historical genocides, can lead to inaccurate beliefs about how genocides unfold. Instead, it's crucial to recognize the agency of perpetrators and the dynamic nature of these events. An example from ancient history, the Asian Vespers of 88 BC, illustrates how Rome's denial of rights to Italians led to war, brutal suppression, and eventual granting of rights. This pattern shows that genocidal processes are not always predictable and can involve overlapping and iterative stages.

    • Power plays by King Mithridates lead to execution of Roman commissionerAnnexing neighboring territories without Roman approval can lead to deadly consequences for Roman leaders and further tensions between Rome and foreign powers.

      Ancient political power plays could lead to complex and far-reaching consequences. In this case, King Mithridates of Pontus, seeking to expand his territory while Rome was distracted, annexed two neighboring kingdoms. However, the Roman commissioner in the area, Manius Aquillius, demanded their return, leading to a series of events that ultimately resulted in the execution of Aquillius by Mithridates after a disastrous invasion attempt. This incident marked a significant shift in power dynamics, with a Roman leader being killed by a foreign king, and set the stage for further tensions and conflicts between Rome and Pontus. The episode also underscores the importance of diplomacy and the potential pitfalls of bribery and hasty military action.

    • The Asian Vespers: A Financial Motivation for GenocideGenocide isn't just driven by ethnic tensions and propaganda, financial gain is also a significant motivator as seen in the Asian Vespers where Mithridates promised locals a share of the victims' property.

      The massacre ordered by King Mithridates of Asia in 88 BC, known as the Asian or Ephesian Vespers, was a clear example of genocide. Tens of thousands of Romans and Italians, along with their families and freedmen, were killed in a rapid and systematic manner. The hatred towards the Romans was fueled by economic tensions and perceived arrogance, but there was no significant buildup to the massacre. Mithridates incentivized the local officials and inhabitants to carry out the killings by promising them a share of the victims' property. Scholars often discuss how genocide is driven by various factors, including ethnic tensions and propaganda, but it's essential to recognize that financial gain is also a significant motivator. The balance sheet makes it worth it for people to commit genocide, and this was true in the case of the Asian Vespers. While the specific motivations behind the massacre may not be fully understood, it's likely that those carrying out the violence saw some sort of resource gain in killing the Romans.

    • The Holocaust was more than just yellow stars and camps, it involved forced sales of Jewish businessesThe Holocaust included the forced sale of Jewish businesses, known as Aryanization, which led to the closure or sale of about two-thirds of Jewish-owned businesses in Germany by 1938, a precursor to the physical elimination of Jewish people.

      The Holocaust was not just about yellow stars and camps, but also about the forced sale of Jewish businesses at drastically reduced prices, a process known as Aryanization. This economic discrimination was a significant part of the Nazi regime's campaign against Jews, leading to the closure or sale of about two-thirds of Jewish-owned businesses in Germany by 1938. The process of Aryanization was a precursor to the physical elimination of Jewish people, which took years to unfold. This historical fact is often overlooked in popular retellings of the Holocaust. The movie "The Shop on Main Street" is a poignant depiction of this aspect of the genocide. It's important to note that both Mithradates and the Nazis had the same basic idea, but the former immediately proceeded to genocide while the latter took years to carry out the killing and financial gain. This separation of the financial gain from the killing might speak to the efficiency of modern civilization in carrying out genocides, but it is a chilling reminder of the human capacity for organizing and participating in such atrocities, regardless of ideological beliefs.

    • Equality and Diversity in Child Hunting Island and Monopoly GoEquality and diversity are crucial values, whether in a child hunting island or a mobile game. They bring people together from diverse backgrounds and foster meaningful connections. Understanding motivations and the continuum of destruction is also essential.

      Equality and diversity are important values, whether it's in the context of a child hunting island or a mobile game. In the discussion about the child hunting island off the coast of Indonesia, it was emphasized that the kidnappers do not discriminate based on socioeconomic status, religion, or race. This highlights the importance of equality and the freely sourced children guarantee. Similarly, in the context of Monopoly Go, the game's ability to bring people together from various backgrounds and offer new experiences keeps players engaged and connected. On a different note, the importance of community and connection was also emphasized through the introduction of Neighbor to Neighbor, a California volunteer's network. This initiative encourages people to build meaningful social bonds with their neighbors and prepare for emergencies. Lastly, the discussion touched upon the research of Irvin Staub, a genocide historian, who focused on the motivations of individuals who consent to take part in genocide. His work highlights the importance of understanding the temporal procession of motivations and the continuum of destruction. Overall, the key takeaway is the importance of equality, diversity, and community connections in various aspects of life.

    • Needs influencing violent actionsPeople's needs for security, moral integrity, social belonging, and a better life shape their participation in violent acts like genocide. Motivators include fear, obedience, economic gain, and social pressure.

      Individuals' motivations and inhibitions, stemming from their needs for security, moral integrity, social belonging, and a better life, influence their participation in violent actions such as genocide. These needs can prioritize depending on the situation, and fear of coercion, obedience to orders, economic gain, and social pressure are common motivators. The hierarchy of needs is not a simple on-off mechanism but a continuum of factors that alter individuals' calculus in the moment. The Holocaust's shift from mass shootings to death camps illustrates the human capacity to engage in horrific acts under the right incentives, despite the long-term psychological toll. Social belonging is also a significant motivation for genocide participants, with people often avoiding speaking up due to fear of consequences or social pressure, but coercion is not always a primary factor.

    • Power of Protest in Preventing GenocidesSpeaking out against genocidal acts can deter individuals from participating due to fear of consequences and the need for moral integrity.

      Protest and public resistance can be effective in preventing or mitigating genocides. Contrary to the belief that individuals are coerced into participating in mass killings due to fear of physical security, the state did not execute German soldiers for refusing to kill Jewish people during the Holocaust. Instead, they were often ostracized by their peers. Scholars like Staub emphasize the power of bystanders to influence the genocidal process. Even the Nazis backed off in the face of public resistance, as seen in Bulgaria and within Germany. The presence of a crowd protesting can make individuals hesitant to continue participating due to the fear of consequences and the need for moral integrity. Therefore, speaking out against genocidal acts can be a powerful deterrent.

    • Understanding the Process of DehumanizationTo prevent genocide, disrupt incentives for participation by creating friction for organizers, making it difficult for people to profit, and maintaining resistance at every stage. Perpetrators often feel impunity and proximity to extremists can influence passive acceptance of violence.

      Dehumanization often occurs during the process of participating in violence, rather than being a precursor to it. People make decisions to commit atrocities based on various factors, including their proximity to extremists, access to resources, and signals from local elites. As they continue to participate, the emotional and physical horror of killing subsides, and the victims may be perceived as less human. To prevent genocide, it's crucial to disrupt all incentives for participation, including creating friction for organizers, making it difficult for people to profit, and maintaining resistance at every stage. The sense of impunity felt by perpetrators can be a significant motivator, and proximity to extremists can influence populations to passively go along with violence. There's no simple solution to stopping genocide, but keeping people from feeling they can participate with impunity is a key part of the strategy.

    • Understanding the Complexity of Motivations for GenocidePeople's motivations for participating in genocides can be complex and banal, not just driven by radicalized beliefs. Seeking joy and excitement in everyday life, like through mobile games, is also important.

      People's motivations for participating in genocides can be complex and banal, rather than solely driven by radicalized beliefs. Using the example of the plots against Hitler during World War 2, some individuals were motivated to act not because they hated the Nazis, but due to the realization of impending defeat and the fear of consequences. Similarly, in the early stages of the Holocaust, people participated for seemingly justifiable reasons, such as the belief that eliminating certain groups was for the greater good. However, it's important to remember that these actions led to devastating consequences, and it's crucial to be aware of the potential for such events to occur and to work towards building strong, supportive communities to prevent them. On a lighter note, another takeaway is the importance of finding joy and excitement in everyday life, as demonstrated by the appeal of mobile games like Monopoly Go and free social casino games like Chumba Casino. These platforms offer new experiences and opportunities for connection, making even the mundane aspects of life more enjoyable. Overall, it's essential to recognize the complexity of human motivations and to strive for positive connections and experiences in our daily lives.

    • Dehumanization and marginalization pave the way for mass violenceRecognizing patterns of dehumanization and resisting hate speech and discriminatory policies are crucial steps in preventing mass violence and upholding human rights.

      The dehumanization and marginalization of certain groups can create an environment where genocide and other forms of mass violence become acceptable. This process can be compared to the weakening of an immune system, where individual barriers to supporting such actions are gradually eroded. The use of rhetoric that frames certain identities as mental illness or a threat to society can contribute to this dehumanization. People may participate in or allow such atrocities to occur due to a variety of reasons, including fear, self-preservation, or even financial incentives. It's important to recognize these patterns and resist the normalization of hate speech and discriminatory policies, as they can pave the way for more serious violations of human rights.

    • Preventing Genocide: Creating Danger or ConsequencesFocusing on preventing genocide by creating a sense of danger or consequences is crucial, as shown by examples like Wallenberg in Budapest and the Nazi in Nanking. Military intervention comes with the cost of lives, making prevention the ultimate goal.

      The prevention of genocide is crucial and can be achieved through disrupting the moment someone is willing to engage in mass killing. This can be done by creating a sense of danger or consequences, as shown by examples like Wallenberg in Budapest and the Nazi in Nanking. Prevention is often overlooked, and while military intervention can stop a genocide, it comes with the cost of taking lives. The challenge lies in preventing genocide from happening in the first place. However, this is a complex issue with ongoing debates in the field of genocide studies. Despite the difficulties, it's essential to focus on prevention as the ultimate goal.

    • Exposing hate speech can prevent genocidesIdentifying and outing those who promote hate speech and genocidal ideologies can deter them from continuing harmful behavior and potentially save lives.

      Identifying and exposing those who promote hate speech and genocidal ideologies can be an effective way to prevent genocides, as it can make these individuals fear the consequences of their actions and deter them from continuing their harmful behavior. This was illustrated in the case of a Nazi doctor in a concentration camp who granted an unusual request from an inmate, which disrupted his motivational hierarchy and allowed the inmate to be saved. The same principle applies to modern-day situations, such as outing members of far-right militias at protests. While there is no definitive solution to preventing genocides, making those who promote hate speech and genocidal ideologies afraid of the repercussions of their actions can be a valuable strategy. Additionally, historical cases show that bureaucratic structures can provide excuses for individuals to save lives, highlighting the importance of creating systems that allow for such actions to be taken without putting the rescuer at risk. Overall, addressing eliminationist rhetoric and holding those who promote it accountable can be a crucial step in preventing genocides.

    • Media did not cause Rwanda genocide aloneMedia, including radio, can incite violence but aren't the sole cause; historical, social, and political factors also play a role.

      While media, including radio, can influence and contribute to hate speech and violence, it is not the sole cause of genocide or mass killings. The Rwanda genocide, for instance, was not solely driven by radio broadcasts, but was influenced by a complex web of historical, social, and political factors. The Belgian colonizers' implementation of racial IDs and favoritism towards the Tutsis, for example, contributed to the division and animosity between the two ethnic groups. The assassination of the president in 1994 and the subsequent civil war further escalated the situation, leading to a 3-month orgy of violence resulting in over 500,000 deaths. While radio broadcasts, such as those from RTLM, did contribute to the violence by dehumanizing the Tutsis and inciting listeners to violence, they were not the sole cause. It's important to remember that propaganda is not a magic bullet, but rather a tool that can exacerbate existing tensions and prejudices.

    • The role of radio propaganda in the Rwandan genocide is more complex than often assumedWhile RTLM did contribute to the violence, it did not directly cause the genocide as some believe. The notion of blind obedience to radio commands is a harmful stereotype that overlooks the complex realities of the situation.

      The role of radio propaganda in the Rwandan genocide has been overly simplified and stereotyped in many accounts. While RTLM did contribute to the violence, it did not directly cause the genocide as some may assume. The notion that Rwandans blindly obeyed radio commands is a harmful stereotype that overlooks the complexities of the situation. It is important to remember that RTLM only began broadcasting six months before the genocide, and not all Rwandans had access to radios. The centralized nature of the Rwandan government also played a role in the events leading up to the genocide. Strauss's research found that the majority of the violence could not be explained by radio broadcasts urging people to kill. Instead, militias, who were already radicalized, were influenced by the broadcasts to target specific groups. This complicates the narrative that Rwandans were mere automatons following radio commands. It is crucial to acknowledge the nuances and complexities of the situation to avoid perpetuating harmful stereotypes.

    • Mass media and social belonging play roles in violent conflictPeople are motivated to conform to their groups for social belonging, even if it means committing traumatic acts, and this desire can contribute to genocide and other violent conflicts.

      Both mass media and social belonging play significant roles in genocide and other forms of violent conflict. The radio's influence in Rwanda's massacres is well-documented, but it's important to remember that the willingness to participate in such violence exists on a continuum. People are motivated to conform to their groups to maintain social belonging, even if it means committing traumatic acts. This is not to excuse the propaganda or the media figures who spread it, but rather to acknowledge that they are part of a larger process. People are radicalized in communities and by communities, and the desire for acceptance and group consensus can be just as powerful as fear or respect for authority. The Milgram experiment, which explored the obedience to authority, is an important piece of this puzzle, but it's crucial to remember that those who obey are also likely to have accepted the leader's views and ideology. The evolution of a group's motivations is a complex issue that requires careful consideration.

    • Understanding obedience to authorityRecognize our responsibility to address and condemn acts of evil, promoting comprehensive resistance to prevent their normalization and spread

      The Milgram experiment, which explored obedience to authority, highlights the complex role personal responsibility plays in societal structures. People's motivation to follow authority goes beyond just obeying orders; they desire to be part of a power structure. The experiment's findings, as discussed by Staub, do not imply that genocides occur due to the targeted group's lack of resistance. Instead, it's essential to recognize our responsibility to address and condemn acts of evil, no matter where they occur. This comprehensive resistance is crucial in preventing the normalization and spread of harmful actions, such as genocides, which can impact anyone, regardless of geographical location.

    • Addressing Genocide and DiscriminationRecognize and prevent genocide and discrimination against marginalized groups by promoting compassion, empathy, and unity towards all communities, and taking action against political figures and events that incite hate.

      Genocide and discrimination against marginalized groups are serious issues that require our attention and prevention. During the discussion, it was acknowledged that these issues disproportionately impact racial, ethnic, religious, and other minority groups. The speakers expressed their concerns about recent political figures and events, and while humor was used, the underlying message was clear: genocide is not acceptable. It's important to remember that history repeats itself, and understanding and preventing past atrocities can help shape a better future. The speakers encouraged listeners to take action and not participate in any form of genocide. They also highlighted the importance of education and awareness to combat revisionism and prevent such tragedies from happening again. Ultimately, the conversation emphasized the need for compassion, empathy, and unity towards all communities.

    • Urgent Issue: Over 500 Anti-LGBTQ+ Bills Under ConsiderationJoin Lambda Legal in opposing discriminatory bills targeting trans and non-binary individuals. Stand up for human rights and equality.

      While the NFL community gears up for the release of the 2024 schedule, there's an urgent issue unfolding off the field. Raquel Willis from Queer Chronicles highlighted the alarming number of over 500 anti-LGBTQ+ bills currently under consideration in state legislatures. These bills primarily target trans and non-binary individuals with discriminatory measures. Lambda Legal, a leading organization fighting for LGBTQ+ rights, is at the forefront of opposing these hateful bills. They invite everyone to join the fight against discrimination and be part of writing the next chapter in their history. To learn more about their ongoing cases and donate, visit their website at lamdalegal.org. This powerful reminder serves as a reminder that while we enjoy sports and entertainment, it's crucial not to overlook the importance of standing up for human rights and equality. Together, we can make a difference and ensure a more inclusive and just society for all.

    Recent Episodes from Behind the Bastards

    Part Two: How the British Empire and U.S. Department of Defense Murdered an Island Paradise

    Part Two: How the British Empire and U.S. Department of Defense Murdered an Island Paradise

    Robert killed a man in Reno, just to watch him die. Also he concludes the story of the murder of the Chagos Islands by the U.S. and the ailing British Empire. With bonus Dog Genocide!

     

    Behind the Bastards is doing it's annual fundraiser for the Portland Diaper Bank! We had a soft start a week or so ago but will actually be plugging it this week and next. Please help if you can!

    https://www.gofundme.com/f/btb-fundraiser-pdx-diaper-bank?attribution_id=sl:a1a2d058-9511-435e-ab61-93bc1252ffa5&utm_campaign=pd_ss_icons&utm_medium=customer&utm_source=twitter 

    Sources:

    https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/02/15/thats-when-nightmare-started/uk-and-us-forced-displacement-chagossians-and

    https://archive.is/KvGqw#selection-1769.0-1781.535

    Vine, David. Island of Shame: The Secret History of the U.S. Military Base on Diego Garcia (p. 18). Princeton University Press. Kindle Edition.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/2/25/how-britain-forcefully-depopulated-a-whole-archipelago/

    https://archive.org/details/webofdeceitbrita0000curt/page/432/mode/2up?q=chagos

    https://journals.openedition.org/oceanindien/2003

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Behind the Bastards
    enJune 20, 2024

    Part One: How the British Empire and U.S. Department of Defense Murdered an Island Paradise

    Part One: How the British Empire and U.S. Department of Defense Murdered an Island Paradise

    Robert welcomes Andrew Ti back to the show to tell the story of the Chagos Islands, a paradise founded by former slaves that was wiped out by the British empire so they could lease it to the U.S. as an air base.

    (2 Part Series)

    Behind the Bastards is doing it's annual fundraiser for the Portland Diaper Bank! We had a soft start a week or so ago but will actually be plugging it this week and next. Please help if you can!

    https://www.gofundme.com/f/btb-fundraiser-pdx-diaper-bank?attribution_id=sl:a1a2d058-9511-435e-ab61-93bc1252ffa5&utm_campaign=pd_ss_icons&utm_medium=customer&utm_source=twitter 

    Sources:

    https://www.hrw.org/report/2023/02/15/thats-when-nightmare-started/uk-and-us-forced-displacement-chagossians-and

    https://archive.is/KvGqw#selection-1769.0-1781.535

    Vine, David. Island of Shame: The Secret History of the U.S. Military Base on Diego Garcia (p. 18). Princeton University Press. Kindle Edition.

    https://www.aljazeera.com/opinions/2019/2/25/how-britain-forcefully-depopulated-a-whole-archipelago/

    https://archive.org/details/webofdeceitbrita0000curt/page/432/mode/2up?q=chagos

    https://journals.openedition.org/oceanindien/2003

    See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

    Behind the Bastards
    enJune 18, 2024

    Related Episodes

    Working Without Shame in International Educational Development? From Consequentialism to Casuistry.

    Working Without Shame in International Educational Development? From Consequentialism to Casuistry.
    The paper sets out to consider the opinion which, at its bluntest, suggests that one should not work (in educational development) in a country which does not respect the principles of a liberal democracy, which has a poor reputation in terms of human rights and or has an autocratic government. The paper argues that such an opinion must rest on some sort of consequentialist balance sheet of the actual and anticipated consequences of committing to such work or declining to do so – and this takes it into some of the problems of applying such an equation. The paper also invites caution in the assessments that westerners make of countries portrayed as a ‘undemocratic’ and the importance of taking into account, for example, history, trajectory and context.

    'Human Rights in the 21st Century': The 2007 Mackenzie-Stuart Lecture (audio)

    'Human Rights in the 21st Century': The 2007 Mackenzie-Stuart Lecture (audio)
    The Centre for European Legal Studies (CELS) hosts an annual public lecture in honour of Lord Mackenzie-Stuart, the first British Judge to be President of the Court of Justice. Among the eminent scholars of European legal studies invited to give the lecture are Professor Joseph Weiler, former Judge David Edwards of the European Court of Justice, and Advocate-General Francis Jacobs of the European Court of Justice. The texts of the Mackenzie-Stuart Lectures are published in the Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies. The 2007 Mackenzie-Stuart Lecture was delivered by the Lord Chancellor and Secretary of State for Justice, Jack Straw, on Thursday 25 October 2007. He spoke about his views on human rights in the 21st century. More information about this lecture, including photographs from the event, is available from the Centre for European Legal Studies website at: https://www.cels.law.cam.ac.uk/mackenzie-stuart-lectures This entry provides an audio source for iTunes.

    #13 Talking about Entrepreneurship

    #13 Talking about Entrepreneurship
    After finishing a 12 day seminar at the IAF that has looked into entrepreneurship with more than 25 participants from all around the world and we will discuss why entrepreneurship in general matters, what we have learned throughout the seminar about entrepreneurship in specific countries. And then thirdly, what policymakers can do to boost and accelerate entrepreneurship in their respective countries. In this episode of IAF TALK we going to meet Jyoti Sachavirawong and Julian Kirchherr. Julian works as a manager in the consulting industry. He is also associated with Utrecht University in the Netherlands where he works as a researcher, and in both of these jobs he does a lot of work together with start-ups but also with policymakers to boost entrepreneurship. So this is very much a topic he is very passionate about. Jyoti is a business consultant, and I has been working on advising companies on how they can enter a market. She provides advice on marketing and communication strategy. But prior to that, she was fortunate enough to have had spent several years in the liberal family working with the Friedrich Naumann Foundation office initially in Malaysia, working on women empowerment issues, and subsequently moving on to work at the regional level on economic freedom and human rights.

    Exiting Russia: the effects of multinational withdrawal

    Exiting Russia: the effects of multinational withdrawal
    Can corporate action contribute to human rights, peace, and conflict prevention? Russia’s invasion of Ukraine triggered not only massive economic and financial sanctions imposed on Russia, but also a significant but incomplete exit of multinational corporations from Russia. This exit has been driven by varying degrees of ethical as well as reputational considerations but has stalled as companies cite operational and legal dilemmas. Nonetheless important precedents have been set that may make companies—and their investors—more conscious and responsible actors in conflict situations. Companies and investors alike may integrate longstanding political risk analysis with emerging human rights due diligence to inform decisions whether to remain in certain countries. They may also consider human rights and humanitarian factors both to ensure a responsible exit and to determine possible post-conflict re-entry in ways that can contribute to peace and prevent further conflict. Such commitments and actions can encourage a new geopolitical corporate responsibility to support the rules-based order that defines the international community and underpins the global economy—and in turn enables the cooperation critical to alleviating inequality and diminishing the climate crisis. An innovative leader and standard-setter for responsible business and investment, Bennett Freeman has co-founded multi-stakeholder initiatives and coalitions focused on the extractives, technology and apparel sectors. Bennett holds degrees in History from the University of California at Berkeley (1979) and Oxford (1981; English-Speaking Union Scholar, Balliol). He served as a Clinton presidential appointee in three positions at the US Department of State, including as deputy assistant secretary of state for democracy, human rights and labour from 1999-2001. He was senior VP for sustainability research and policy at Calvert Investments, 2006-15. As principal of Bennett Freeman Associates LLC, he currently advises multinational corporations, international institutions and NGOs on policy and strategy related to human rights and labour rights. He was the lead author of Shared Space Under Pressure: Business Support for Civic Freedoms and Human Rights Defenders (2018) and is an Associate Fellow of the International Law Programme at Chatham House. Bennett is a co-founder and Steering Committee member of Business for Ukraine (B4Ukraine), a coalition that seeks to complete the exit of foreign companies from Russia and to set higher standards for human rights due on the part of companies and investors in conflict situations—and in turn to contribute to a new ethic of geopolitical corporate responsibility to support the international rules-based order.