Logo
    Search

    Podcast Summary

    • Embracing the Darker Emotions: A Path to Deeper UnderstandingEmbracing our 'darker' emotions can lead to a deeper understanding of ourselves and the world. Using Plato's allegory of the cave, Mariana Alessandri encourages us to step into the light and face our darkness.

      It's natural and okay to experience a range of emotions, including the "darker" ones like anger, anxiety, depression, and grief. In her book "Night Vision," Mariana Alessandri challenges the standard view that sees these emotions as something to be avoided or overcome. Instead, she argues that they can reveal important truths about ourselves and the world. Using Plato's allegory of the cave as an analogy, she suggests that our perceptions are often based on shadows, and that stepping into the light and facing our darkness can lead to a deeper understanding of reality. Wise, on the other hand, offers a practical solution for managing money across different currencies, allowing users to send and spend at the real-time mid market exchange rate without hidden fees. With over 16 million customers worldwide, it's a smart choice for anyone looking to navigate the complexities of international finance.

    • The role of puppeteers in shaping our perceptions of light and darkConsider the sources of our beliefs and question potential biases and motivations of those shaping our understanding of truth and reality

      The dichotomy between light and dark is a pervasive metaphor in our culture, often seen as synonymous with good and truth versus ignorance and darkness. However, it's essential to consider the role of "puppeteers" who manipulate our perceptions and beliefs, often in the shadows. These influences can be intentional or unintentional, and the darkness itself is not inherently negative. Instead, it's a part of who we are. The allegory of the cave invites us to question the sources of our beliefs and consider the potential biases and motivations of those who shape our understanding of truth and reality. By acknowledging the complexity of both light and dark, we can strive for a more nuanced and balanced perspective.

    • The Harmful Impact of Societal Messaging on EmotionsSocietal messaging promoting constant positivity can lead to self-blame and feelings of brokenness when experiencing negative emotions. It's crucial to question these messages and accept the full range of human emotions as natural.

      Our societal messaging, particularly around emotions like anger, can be harmful if we believe we should always be positive and in control. This perspective, known as the "light metaphor," can lead to self-blame and feelings of brokenness when we experience negative emotions. The author's book, influenced by the pandemic, explores this concept and challenges the notion that emotions are optional or unhelpful. Instead, she encourages understanding and accepting the full range of human emotions as a natural part of the human experience. The "brokenness story," the opposite of the light metaphor, arises when we believe we should always be positive and then feel the opposite, leading to self-criticism and feelings of being a "monster." It's essential to question societal messaging and consider its potential impact on our well-being.

    • Masking Sadness with AngerSocietal expectations and personal experiences can lead to shame, self-blame, and anger when expressing sadness. Instead of perpetuating toxic positivity, we should reconfigure our emotional society to be more accepting of a range of emotions and reduce the stigma around expressing vulnerability.

      Our emotional experiences and societal expectations can lead to feelings of shame, self-blame, and anger, particularly when it comes to expressing emotions like sadness. The author shares her personal experience of growing up in a household where emotions, especially sadness, were not encouraged or accepted. As a result, she found herself masking her true feelings with anger. The author also critiques the self-help industry, arguing that it can perpetuate toxic positivity and blame individuals for their unhappiness, while profiting off their suffering. Instead, she advocates for reconfiguring our emotional society to be more accepting of a range of emotions and reducing the stigma around expressing vulnerability. The author's message is that we are not alone in our emotional experiences, and it's important to challenge societal expectations and seek out supportive communities that validate and understand our feelings.

    • Stoicism and Positive Thinking in AmericaStoicism's blend with American positive thinking encourages belief in controlling circumstances through positive thinking, while Aristotle's perspective emphasizes acknowledging and understanding emotions for balance

      The intersection of Stoicism and the American cultural emphasis on positive thinking, as popularized by Norman Vincent Peale's "Power of Positive Thinking," has shaped unique attitudes and dispositions in the US. This blend of Stoicism and Peale's teachings encourages individuals to believe they can control their circumstances through positive thinking, contrasting the Stoic belief that external circumstances are beyond control. Mariana, a fan of Stoicism, eventually found Aristotle's perspective more satisfying as she recognized the limitations of suppressing emotions and the importance of acknowledging and understanding them. The allure of Stoicism lies in its humanizing approach to suffering, with philosophers like Seneca and Marcus Aurelius offering insights on finding tranquility by focusing on personal judgments rather than external circumstances. However, Aristotle's emphasis on embracing emotions and striving for balance resonated more deeply with Mariana.

    • Understanding the Impact of Emotions on Our LivesStoicism and Aristotle offer different perspectives on managing emotions: Stoicism advocates neutrality and detachment, while Aristotle acknowledges feelings and emphasizes self-understanding and controlling actions.

      Our perception and response to circumstances greatly impact our emotional state. The stoics propose neutrality and detachment from negative emotions, while Aristotle acknowledges the inevitability of feelings and emphasizes the importance of understanding oneself and controlling one's actions. Both philosophies offer valuable insights for managing emotions, particularly in dealing with challenges and grief. While stoicism may seem appealing with its promise of controlling emotions, Aristotle's approach, which accepts feelings as natural, might be more relatable and practical for many people. Ultimately, both philosophies encourage self-awareness and self-improvement, emphasizing the importance of our actions in response to our emotions.

    • Society's handling of grief can prolong itSociety's lack of understanding and stigma around grief can make it a painful and isolating experience, prolonging the grieving process

      The way society handles grief can prolong and intensify the grieving process. The Stoics' perspective, as discussed, suggests that grief is optional and one should will oneself out of it. However, the shame and lack of understanding surrounding grief can make it a painful and isolating experience. The book "It's Okay That You're Not Okay" by Megan Devine highlights the harmful things people often say to those grieving, which can worsen their feelings. The world's inability to handle dark moods and the resulting stigma and loneliness can make grief last longer than necessary. Instead, it's essential to understand the societal context that may be contributing to the length of the grieving process and offer genuine support and understanding rather than platitudes or avoidance.

    • Embracing Negative EmotionsSociety's expectations of constant positivity can be harmful, acknowledging and validating bad days and dark moods is important, reframing language around grief to be more emotionally tolerant.

      Our approach to grief and handling negative emotions needs to change. Society's expectations of constant positivity can lead to feelings of failure and pressure when we experience sadness or grief. The idea of "no bad days" can be harmful, as it implies that having a bad day is a failure. Instead, we should acknowledge and validate the existence of bad days and dark moods, rather than trying to combat them with positivity. The pressure to stay positive can be especially challenging during times of grief, when the natural response may be to fall apart. It's important to reframe our language and vocabulary around these experiences, recognizing that they are a part of the human experience and not a sign of falling apart or being broken. We should aim to create a more emotionally tolerant world that allows for the full range of human emotions.

    • Embracing Emotional HonestyRecognize the importance of emotional honesty, prepare for loss, share pain with others, and create a world where emotional honesty is valued.

      Emotional honesty is as important as intellectual honesty, and it's essential to acknowledge and express our emotions, especially during challenging times. The speaker shares her experience of dealing with her mother's impending death and how she's practicing emotional honesty by sharing her pain with others and allowing herself to grieve. She encourages us to prepare for loss by recognizing the mortality of our loved ones and practicing grief in advance. By inviting others into our world of pain, we can turn a potentially isolating experience into a shared human experience. Ultimately, the speaker's reflections invite us to embrace the richness and complexity of our emotions and to create a world where emotional honesty is valued and practiced.

    • Recognizing and dignifying emotionsAcknowledging emotions, even painful ones, fosters deeper human connections and understanding

      Recognizing and dignifying emotions, even the painful ones, is essential for human connection and understanding. According to the speaker, we are like guitars, where vibrating one set of strings causes the other set to resonate. Emotional honesty and sharing our stories can help thaw frozen heartstrings and create deeper connections. The goal is not to glorify or mask negative emotions but to acknowledge and dignify the person experiencing them. As humans, we are complex beings, and acknowledging our emotions, whether sadness, depression, or physical pain, is a crucial part of our humanity. By recognizing the dignity in each other's suffering, we can build stronger, more compassionate relationships.

    • Honoring and transcending depressionDepression is a part of life, not a sign of weakness or brokenness. We should aim to talk about and incorporate it without shame, and create supportive environments for individuals and children to express and manage their emotions.

      Instead of stigmatizing and suppressing emotions like depression, we should aim to honor and transcend them. Depression is a part of life that cannot be eradicated, and trying to do so can lead to self-hatred and a sense of being broken. Instead, we should find better ways to talk about and incorporate these emotions into our lives without shame. This not only applies to individuals but also to society as a whole, which needs to become more emotionally flexible and tolerant. By sharing our pain and allowing ourselves to be vulnerable, we can form deeper connections with others. This idea was emphasized in the discussion of the connection between pain and soul connection, as well as the importance of not suppressing emotions in children. Parenting, in particular, is a test of these principles, and it's crucial not to suppress children's emotions or teach them to code vulnerability as weakness. Instead, we should aim to create a supportive environment where they can express their feelings and learn healthy ways to manage them.

    • Accepting and validating emotional painAllow emotions to be felt and expressed, creating a safe space for healing and understanding. Compassion and understanding, not fixing or changing, leads to deeper connections.

      Accepting and validating emotional pain, rather than trying to quickly overcome it or make someone else feel better, can lead to a deeper connection and less suffering. By allowing ourselves and others to fully experience and express emotions, we create a safe space for healing and understanding. This doesn't mean wallowing in sadness or avoiding happiness, but rather acknowledging that all emotions are valid and deserving of attention. By eliminating the pressure to constantly cheer others up, we can be present and supportive in their moments of sadness or struggle. The key is to be compassionate and understanding, rather than trying to fix or change the situation. This approach can lead to a more authentic and meaningful connection with ourselves and others.

    • Being present is more meaningful than cheering upYour presence and support can make a difference during someone's tough times, silence and companionship can be more effective than empty words or awkward condolences

      It's not our job to cheer up those in pain. Instead, being present and offering companionship can be more meaningful. Mariana Caplan, author of "Night Vision," emphasizes that when we care about someone, we should not abandon them in their suffering. Rather than forcing cheerfulness, simply being there for them can provide comfort. Sometimes, silence and presence can be more effective than empty words or awkward condolences. So, the next time you encounter someone going through a tough time, remember that your presence and support can make a significant difference.

    Recent Episodes from The Gray Area with Sean Illing

    The existential freedom of Blackness

    The existential freedom of Blackness
    Nathalie Etoke joins The Gray Area to talk about existentialism, the Black experience, and the legacy of dehumanization.  Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Nathalie Etoke. Her book is Black Existential Freedom. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The world after nuclear war

    The world after nuclear war
    A mile of pure fire. A flash that melts everything — titanium, steel, lead, people. A blast that mows down every structure in its path, 3 miles out in every direction. Journalist Annie Jacobsen spent years interviewing scientists, high-ranking military officials, politicians, and other experts to find out how a nuclear attack would be triggered, the devastation it would cause, the ruptures it would create in the social fabric, and how likely it is to happen today. She wrote about all of this in her new book Nuclear War: A Scenario. Jacobsen spends the hour clearly laying out the horrifying yet captivating specifics for Sean, and the prospects for avoiding catastrophe.  Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Annie Jacobsen. Her book is Nuclear War: A Scenario Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Gaza, Camus, and the logic of violence

    Gaza, Camus, and the logic of violence
    Albert Camus was a Nobel-winning French writer and public intellectual. During Algeria’s bloody war for independence in the 1950s, Camus took a measured stance, calling for an end to the atrocities on each side. He was criticized widely for his so-called “moderation.” Philosophy professor Robert Zaretsky joins Sean to discuss Camus’s thoughts on that conflict and the parallels with the present moment. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Robert Zaretsky Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    This is your kid on smartphones

    This is your kid on smartphones
    Old people have always worried about young people. But psychologist Jonathan Haidt believes something genuinely different and troubling is happening right now. He argues that smartphones and social media have had disastrous effects on the mental health of young people, and derailed childhood from real world play to touchscreens. He joins Sean to talk about his research and some of the criticisms of it. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Jonathan Haidt (@jonhaidt). His book is The Anxious Generation. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Life after death?

    Life after death?
    Sebastian Junger came as close as you possibly can to dying. While his doctors struggled to revive him, the veteran reporter and avowed rationalist experienced things that shocked and shook him, leaving him with profound questions and unexpected revelations. In his new book, In My Time of Dying, Junger explores the mysteries and commonalities of people’s near death experiences. He joins Sean to talk about what it’s like to die and what quantum physics can tell us about living that countless religions can’t. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Sebastian Junger. His new book is In My Time of Dying. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    The world after Ozempic

    The world after Ozempic
    Ozempic and other new weight loss drugs are being touted as potential miracle cures for diabetes and obesity. Journalist Johann Hari experimented with the drug and dropped 40 pounds. In his new book, Magic Pill, Hari discusses his experience with Ozempic and speaks to many of the leading scientists to better understand how the drug works. He joins Sean to talk about what he’s learned and the complicated trade-offs involved in the decision to take these drugs. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Johann Hari (@johannhari101). His new book is Magic Pill. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Cristian Ayala Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    UFOs, God, and the edge of understanding

    UFOs, God, and the edge of understanding
    Religious studies professor Diana Pasulka was a total nonbeliever in alien life, but she began to question this after speaking with many people who claim to have had otherworldly encounters. She also noticed how these accounts parallel the foundational texts of many religions. She has since written two books on the topic, the most recent of which is Encounters: Experiences with Nonhuman Intelligences. She joins Sean to talk about extraterrestrial life, God, angels, and the renewed interest in UFOs.  Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Diana Pasulka (@dwpasulka). Her new book is Encounters: Experiences with Nonhuman Intelligences. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    How to listen

    How to listen
    Most of us don’t know how to truly listen, and it’s causing all sorts of problems. Sean Illing is joined by journalist Kate Murphy, the author of You’re Not Listening: What You’re Missing and Why It Matters, to discuss what it means to be a good listener, the problems that are caused when we don’t listen to each other, and the positive impacts on our health when we do. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Kate Murphy, author of You’re Not Listening: What You’re Missing and Why It Matters Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Subscribe for free. Be the first to hear the next episode of The Gray Area. Subscribe in your favorite podcast app. Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey This episode was made by:  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Editorial Director, Vox Talk: A.M. Hall Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Everything's a cult now

    Everything's a cult now
    The internet has fractured our world into a million little subcultures catering to the specific identities and habits of everyone online. Writer Derek Thompson believes this has led to a widespread cult-like mentality that has crept into all facets of modern life — pop culture, media, politics, and religion itself. He joins Sean to explain this theory, and why it’s maybe not such a bad thing. Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Derek Thompson (@dkthomp). His podcast is Plain English, and he writes for The Atlantic. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Fareed Zakaria on our revolutionary moment

    Fareed Zakaria on our revolutionary moment
    Is it possible that we are living through one of the most revolutionary periods in human history? CNN’s Fareed Zakaria believes that we are and argues that the convergence of AI and the global backlash against liberal democracy are upending political orders around the world. He joins Sean to talk about how this period relates to history’s most impactful revolutions, both political and technological.  Click here to take the Vox podcast survey Host: Sean Illing (@seanilling), host, The Gray Area Guest: Fareed Zakaria (@fareedzakaria). His new book is Age of Revolutions. Enjoyed this episode? Rate The Gray Area ⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐ and leave a review on Apple Podcasts. Be the first to hear new episodes of The Gray Area by following us in your favorite podcast app. Links here: https://www.vox.com/the-gray-area Support The Gray Area by making a financial contribution to Vox! bit.ly/givepodcasts Please take a second to help us learn more about you! vox.com/podcastsurvey This episode was made by:  Producer: Jon Ehrens  Engineer: Patrick Boyd Learn more about your ad choices. Visit podcastchoices.com/adchoices

    Related Episodes

    STM Podcast #44: Daniel A. Kaufman - How to Live a Good Life According to Aristotle

    STM Podcast #44: Daniel A. Kaufman - How to Live a Good Life According to Aristotle

    On episode 44, we welcome philosopher Daniel A. Kaufman to discuss the flourishing life according to Aristotle, the limited utility of philosophy and self-help, debate the logic of Stoicism, and discuss the importance of experience and moderation in practical wisdom. 

    Daniel A. Kaufman got his B.A. in history and philosophy at the University of Michigan and his Ph.D. in philosophy at the CUNY Graduate Center. He is Professor of Philosophy at Missouri State University, and his main areas of interest are aesthetics, epistemology, metaphysics, and the philosophy of language. Daniel is also the editor and publisher of The Electric Agora. The Electric Agora publishes essays, videos, reviews, and humorous pieces, lying at the intersection of philosophy, the humanities, science, and popular culture. Daniel is the host of the Sophia program on MeaningofLife.tv. He is also one of the authors and editors of the book “How To Live a Good Life” and today we are discussing Aristotelianism. The link for the book can be found below in the description! 

    Leon Garber is a philosophical writer, contemplating and elucidating the deep recesses of man's soul. He is a Licensed Mental Health Counselor/Psychotherapist — specializing in Existential Psychotherapy, Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy, and Trauma Therapy — and manages a blog exploring issues of death, self-esteem, love, freedom, life-meaning, and mental health/mental illness, from both empirical and personal viewpoints. 

    Alen D. Ulman is a content creator and life long auto-didact. Alen manages the page Ego Ends Now which is a growing community for expanding consciousness with vital information about science, medicine, self actualization, philosophy, psychology and methods to overcome identification with compulsive thought. The purpose of Ego Ends Now is to make sure to give everyone in it's community every tool available to add levity in their own lives, making it a very real possibility for them to create a life of their own design, and help impact the world and our global community positively.

    Find us on: 

    Twitter: https://twitter.com/seize_podcast 

    O4L: https://o4lonlinenetwork.com/seizethe... 

    Instagram: https://www.instagram.com/seizethemom... 

    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SeizeTheMome... 

    We are also everywhere podcasts are available! 

    Where you can follow Daniel A. Kaufman: 

    The Electric Agora: https://theelectricagora.com/

    Sophia: https://meaningoflife.tv/programs/current/sophia

    The Electric Agora on Twitter: https://twitter.com/ElectricAgora

    How to Live a Good Life Book Link: https://www.amazon.com/dp/0525566147/ref=cm_sw_r_tw_dp_U_x_GrzsEb6MH4VK2

     

    #23 - Shakespeare's Hamlet Pt. 2: What Is The Question, Exactly?

    #23 - Shakespeare's Hamlet Pt. 2: What Is The Question, Exactly?

    Scott and Producer Trent wrap up their discussion of Shakespeare's Hamlet, close-reading Hamlet's soliloquies and dissecting the structure of Shakespeare's verse. They reflect on Shakespeare's impact on modern literature, the curiously secular perspective of the play in a highly religious time period, and whether Shakespeare sought to moralize or draw conclusions (spoiler: we don't think he does).

     

    You can't read Hamlet and not talk about the most famous of his soliloquies, the "To Be or Not to Be?" speech at the heart of the play, both literally and figuratively. A surface level reading suggests that Hamlet is contemplating suicide at this moment of the play, having come to no certain conclusions about the best way to resolve his dilemma -- his father murdered, his mother's loyalty in doubt, and many of his friends suspect. It's an understandable position, but perhaps Hamlet is also touching on something deeper, a question of existence; whether humans would be better off having never existed, rather than face the "whips and scorns of time." It's an existential reflection, which Hamlet sums up beautifully elsewhere in the play: "there is nothing either good or bad, but thinking makes it so."

    In this soliloquy and the ones that follow, Hamlet arrives at an unpleasant truth: that we are all dealt different hands in life, yet we all must play them (or not be living at all). Sometimes the optimal play for that hand predicts no good outcomes, yet play we must. The notion of a "good life," therefore, rests on the manner in which one plays their hand, rather than the outcome or influence their play has on their circumstances. Even if the optimal play is a poor one, "nothing is either good or bad, but thinking makes it so."

    In one sense, Shakespeare draws a rather modern conclusion -- an existential conclusion -- about life, centuries before existentialism would be formally developed. He also cleverly avoids moralizing, leaving any sense of justice, revenge, or morality ambiguous. In the end, nearly every major character dies. The inevitability of death, and the way the it annuls the virtue (or vice) of ostensibly good and evil characters, is the only firm conclusion the play seems to make: "sans teeth, sans eyes, sans taste, sans everything."

    Ep.88 HIGHLIGHT I Learning from past mistakes

    Ep.88 HIGHLIGHT I Learning from past mistakes
    WANT THE FULL EPISODE? Check out yesterday's episode Ep.88 I Spencer Klavan I Deciding to Save the West, or download it directly using this link.

    Spencer Klavan joins the show to discuss the modern crises that threaten Western civilization and the decisions required to overcome them.

    KEY TOPICS
    Aristotle’s lasting influence on modern decision-making.
    The pseudo-religious tendencies of Stoicism.
    The 5 modern crises that threaten the fabric of our civilization.

    Order your copy of Spencer’s book, “How to Save the West: Ancient Wisdom for 5 Modern Crises”: https://www.amazon.com/How-Save-West-Ancient-Wisdom/dp/1684513456

    CONNECT WITH US
    www.decidedlypodcast.com
    Join us on Instagram: @decidedlypodcast
    Join us on Facebook
    Shawn’s Instagram: @shawn_d_smith
    Sanger’s Instagram: @sangersmith

    MAKING A FINANCIAL DECISION?
    At Decidedly Wealth Management, we focus on decision-making as the foundational element of success, in our effort to empower families to purposefully apply their wealth to fulfill their values and build a thriving legacy.
    LEARN MORE
    www.decidedlywealth.com

    SUBSCRIBE TO OUR WEEKLY DECISION-MAKING TIP EMAIL

    Join us every Wednesday for more strategies to DEFEAT bad decision-making - one episode at a time!

    MENTIONED IN THIS EPISODE
    “How to Save the West: Ancient Wisdom for 5 Modern Crises”: https://www.amazon.com/How-Save-West-Ancient-Wisdom/dp/1684513456

    Gateway to the Stoics: Marcus Aurelius’s Meditations, Epictetus’s Enchiridion, and Selections from Seneca’s Letters: https://www.amazon.com/Gateway-Stoics-Meditations-Epictetuss-Enchiridion/dp/1684514002

    CONNECT WITH SPENCER KLAVAN
    Instagram: @sklavan
    Twitter: @spencerklavan
    Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/SpencerAKlavan/
    LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/in/spencer-klavan-0a963631/
    “How to Save the West: Ancient Wisdom for 5 Modern Crises”: https://www.amazon.com/How-Save-West-Ancient-Wisdom/dp/1684513456
    Gateway to the Stoics: Marcus Aurelius’s Meditations, Epictetus’s Enchiridion, and Selections from Seneca’s Letters: https://www.amazon.com/Gateway-Stoics-Meditations-Epictetuss-Enchiridion/dp/1684514002
    Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/young-heretics/id1513602173

    Spencer Klavan is a scholar, writer, and podcaster who has harbored a lifelong devotion to the great works and principles of the West. After studying Greek and Latin as an undergraduate at Yale, he spent five years at Oxford University to earn his doctorate in ancient Greek literature. Now an editor at the Claremont Institute, he has written for many outlets, including The Atlantic, the Los Angeles Times, City Journal, Newsweek, the Claremont Review of Books, The Federalist, The American Mind, and The Daily Wire.

    His most recent work sounded the alarm on the cultural decline of the Western world, titled “How to Save the West: Ancient Wisdom for 5 Modern Crises”. Spencer’s deep understanding of the roots of Western civilization makes him a trustworthy guide for navigating our evolving culture, and what we can do to help. His analysis: The situation is dire. But every crisis we face today we have faced—and surmounted—before.